of the the we don't need a preemptive strike yet, because in response to account to strike, the enemy will be guaranteed to be destroyed. let them are put in and say there is no need for preemptive nuclear strikes by russia, but what is the company will deliver a devastating response if it ever comes under such as the russian president also say's most to reserve is the right to send long range weapons to countries like the dark in response to the western army all season ideas to mass is a policy. it's rooted in the amounts of the people to have a thing. so we can eliminate the masses wrong from the idea of spokesperson and saving a contradicting prime minister. netanyahu, whose decisive rhetoric on defeating the policy in the military with i bryson

walter around the last years audit kind of for branding the a really. and revelation regard core to risk and taking foreign ministry calls the . this is our to international. my name's you don't know nieland's. 30 minutes of news and views starts right now. russian troops are making steady progress on the ukraine bustle fields. there's no need to even consider a pre emptive use of nuclear weapons. however, any such attack on the country will be met with a devastating response from us, but that is, according to president clinton speaking today. after dropping off his state visits to vietnam and north korea, this is richard. like we are still thinking about how nuclear doctrine could be changed. we know that the potential adversary is working on new elements associated

with lowering the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons in particular, ultra low power and explosive nuclear devices being developed. and we know that in expert circles in the west, the idea is that there's nothing terrible with using such weapons. it may not be terrible, but we must pay attention to this. we don't need a pre emptive strike yet because in response to account the strike, the enemy will be guaranteed to be destroyed. the russian presidents for marks came during a press conference that wrapped up who's dpr k vietnam trip before that entity on young lawyer pollutant. and kim, john signed a comprehensive strategic partnership agreement that featured information for and i quote for military and other assistance in case of aggression against either nation or to correspond a double quarter in hanoi. it takes us through some of them are pollutants. comments are here today now the main subject to that was probably one of the most

important ones during this question and answer regarding the agreement, the new agreement on strategic cooperation that vladimir putin assigned with the leader of the d p r k. came john own because it had a, it has a clause there that says that in the event of aggression against one of the signatories, the other signatory is to enter into is to step in militarily, to defend and help that, that other countries. so this is a serious step of course of let him are put in said that the moscow was not ruling out the potential of sending weapons to the dpr k. on the basis of this new agreement to the eclipse, the thought of those who supply these weapons believe they are not at war with us. i said that we then reserve the right to supply weapons to other regions of the world. bearing in mind our agreements with the democratic people's republic of korea, i do not exclude this either and where they will end up next. we can also say in the same way here, the west supplies weapons to ukraine and says that they are out of it's control.

and it doesn't matter how they are used. we can also say that we have delivered something to someone, and then we have no control over their use and let them think about this topic. so at this stage, the most important task for us is to rebuild these attacks to ukraine conflict was also discussed. there's no getting around that. russian president vladimir putin spoke about the heart of offensive. the reason harker of offensive by russian forces saying that there's, there are no plans to actually take or make an approach on the regional capital park of the reason why russian troops needed to take territory in that region is because is to basically put the ukrainian artillery positions farther away from civilian targets in russian territory to prevent them from being shelled like belgrade for example, which is pretty much under constant showing by ukrainian artillery pieces. but the russian president also spoke about the russian nuclear, dr. and essentially,

because there are talks in the russian government about potentially revising it right now. the russian nuclear dr. and only allows for the launching of nuclear weapons in the event of this being a retaliatory nuclear stripe. or in the event that the russian government's very existence is at stake. and vladimir putin said that it seems like the west is trying to accomplish. just that decent amount of egypt, they also say that they want to achieve the strategic defeat of russia on the battlefield. what does this mean for russia? for russia, this means the end of it, statehood. here's what it means. this means the end of the 1000 year history of the russian states. i think this is clear to everyone. and then the question arises, why should we be afraid? isn't it better than to finish it? he also talks about negotiations, right? uh, the russian present again reiterated that ma scale is, is and has always been ready for negotiations while it's ukraine that has been

consistently rejecting them under the supervision of there are western patrons of course, in the united states and new k, etc. but he also spoke about the fact that the russian president doesn't really see the lens. the last thing much longer than the 2nd, then the 1st half of next year in office. because of the fact that he has absolutely lost his legitimacy since his presidential term has expired. and the russian president referred to a specific ruling by the ukrainian constitutional court that took place in 2015 ac. and you're clear is a decision from the constitutional court in 2015. what it is directly written that the president's term of office is 5 years. and that's all the hits just that the west doesn't want to change the lensky. now the time is not right, it is obvious all the unpopular decisions, much including lowering the conscription age will be blamed on him after that, they'll change it. now sanctions was also a big topic of discussion,

specifically when the russian president was indeed dpr k. because as we know, the dpr k is also as heavily sanctioned country journalist asked the russian president about what he thought about that. and he said that the, the sanctions against the dpr k specifically are quite strange. they really hurt people who are struggling the most to feed their families and take care of them. and even compared it to the leningrad blockade for which his own family had suffered during world war 2. i think it was a good idea. and i said that some of the sanctions that were imposed against the p r t to put it mildly look very strange. and what leningrad experienced during the great patriotic war. everyone knows very well. this was a blockade when people were starved to death. what's going on in north korea now is this humane, the sanctions that are introduced when it's primarily for political reasons? of course, we still must correspond to the or level of human development, which if it's less political tar that vladimir potent has been on in the dpr k in

vietnam, had involved a lot of important negotiations. a lot of important documents were signed and this press conference essentially went through the outcomes of these historic events and the main takeaways from what we can expect in the future. as a result of these newly sealed agreements, washington was quick to criticize the mutual defense pack between russia and the dpr. k. u. s. national security spokesman john kirby also took a job, a young young i'm to run, as he reiterated the allegations that russia and its allies have repeatedly denied . argues that disagreement is also a sign of russia's desperation. i mean, they're reaching out to north korea missiles, which say they are still getting the one that they don't have a lot of friends in the world. and they're trying to do everything they can to pull on the strings of the friends and thank you for joining us from new york state now

as independent candidates for the us senate di um, sar. diane, you're most welcome. thank you. glad to be with you. we just heard the piece of footage from john kirby claiming that russia's latest diplomatic moods in asia or a quote sign of desperation. what's your reaction to the and i find it a bit amusing because in some of the latest actions by the united states at the u. n. and elsewhere, we have very strong allies, like micronesia, which puts, take me, is being much more desperate. i think that the west, the, the political leadership, the people making the policy are very diluted and somehow has not dawned on them that the world is in a completely new dynamic. and it is we who are isolating ourselves. and i think

president putin is trying to outflank us and perhaps provoke some people to consider a more reasonable approach to dealing with international affairs. it was quite a and level unknown and come bottom speech today by a lot of them are putting answering questions in vietnam. about a host total of issues, but including the use of nuclear weapons. if the country comes on dred talk, essentially, about the holy defensive in nature, but we have them if you challenge our existence is that for as well, that's then the russian policy. and unfortunately, the united states is not as clear, and i think our government owes it to the world to be particularly clear since we are today the only nation that has actually used nuclear weapons and

hiroshima and nagasaki. so one would think that we are the ones who should very clearly express our limitations, such as no 1st use of which i believe was something that president biden said he intended before he came into office. so i think rush has actually been much more clear under what circumstances they would be obliged to respond, but not preemptively, as the west seems to say. there was a message of sorts sent, died as well, president put and saying that russia is considering supplying long range weapons to other countries. essentially in a tips for top reciprocal over the western arming of ukraine will not give those countries paused for thoughts. i don't know, i don't know what we'll give these countries. pause for thought. i think we do have

an election coming up. and i observed that the great momentum among voters and younger people against the genocide occurring and the gods did seem to register with the biden administration, at least to begin to pretend he supports a ceasefire and other matters. so i think there's a combination of things that could have some leverage on the policy of the united states. but i think what is really requires to develop an entirely different level of thinking. the world is in a new paradigm. and if the united states resumed our anti colonial identity, we would fit into it rather well. but we seem to have lost that me on the prospects of talks with ukraine level or putting urged other world powers to seriously consider russia's recent proposal for

a piece that came just ahead of the swimming piece summit in switzerland done well . what was your take on the time that russia wasn't invited? couldn't speak as a party to that to even, you know, if they wanted to. but yet the call for peace was old, but ignored. well, obviously there's a farcical uh, this was tox. where a far as how can you have it's supposedly, if you want to portray it as an issue between ukraine and russia, which it really isn't. but if that is your narrative, then rush to has to be involved in the conversation. i think prudence proposal was very reasonable. i should not have been rejected out of hand and i can see many voices in the west actually trying to put it back on the table. people who are military people like colonel mcgregor's scott ritter. others are trying to get an

even news week interviewed ambassador, i'm turn off so people are trying to get uh get this onto the table in the west because i think it is something that deserves consideration and is the most reasonable thing that has been presented thus far the view of independent us senate candidate die on so our live on the program. thank you very much. thank you . for i took more world sad news. the you hasn't noticed, it's 1st sight, sions, against russia's liquefied natural gas sector. in the 14 package of restrictions on moscow, but the european block has actually been scooping off and increasing volume about very own and g. honestly, the sanctions come with a big loophole. as archie contributor rachel larson's been exploring a young bass of theirs, disagree, the powerful and substantial fourteen's package of functions and reaction to the

russian aggression against ukraine. this package provides new targeted measures and maximizes the impact of existing sanctions by closing loopholes. all right, so here we go again, more end to the rest of the sections that are so powerful that it was 14 rounds ago . now that cleaners, so a promise to bring brush it to its knees. and european leaders brag about how everyone could play along with the charade at home by taking short showers like the german economy minister, robert hatchback, was bragging about. french present a menu and mack who was modeling turtle neck tops during the winter time, encouraging people not to heat their homes. and of course, in the summer time, not to cool them. also they could ditch rushing gas for ukraine. well, it turns out that it was just another virtue signaling performance to impress their girlfriend, your training, present environments, zalinski because in reality, they were wrapping up in ports of russian liquefied natural gas. so the big

headline with these new sanctions is that b e u is now apparently going to do something really new. and finally hit russian l n g. it may come as a surprise to some folks playing along at home that they weren't actually already doing that. and maybe it will come isn't even bigger surprise that well, they still really are going to be because of russian l. n g shipments of gas for use in europe still are not going to be impacted. what's new is that the ships that bring the rushing gas into european ports now just aren't allowed to transfer it to ships so they can leave for other countries. the package includes ban on the tongue shipment of russian, ellen g to 3rd country. so why are the you including a probation of reload and services as well as ship the ship and ship to show transfers impulse into the e. u. a still allowed. so what's been happening is the russian gas from cyber area has been coming into the you in 2 countries like france, belgium, spain,

and the netherlands. and then it gets turned around and sent right over to places like turkey and china or elsewhere in southeast asia. the e u is now saying that can't happen anymore, but what is still entirely possible under these new rules is for the russian l. n g to be dropped off in europe and stay there for a little while and maybe enjoy a bag yet. and a rose a, somewhere in a french cafe before deciding that it's no longer self with that defying as russian elegy, but rather european analogy and well that you can then make a profit from selling it to asia. i guess that's how they're going to stick it to put in by marching up russian gas that they claim they want nothing to do with. it's kind of like drop shipping where someone buys the products on the cheap from an online, wholesale or in asia like alibaba, for example. and then march the price way up and sells it in their online store as their own product and makes

a profit on the margin on the arbitrage. so this would be what the, you could then do with russian gas, sure ships carrying russian fuel. you can still come here to the you, but you have to leave your russian fuel here. can't just transfer it offshore to another country so they could do a deal with the rest of directly. we're going to be the middle man and make some money off of it and i guess ticket to food in the process. sounds like they're really sticking it to food and all right. yeah. so why is that you even bothering putting on this or show any way? because virtue signaling for ukraine is a whole lot less damaging than actually carrying out the kind of self owning it is the they displayed earlier on in this conflict. like when they said they do something that sounded suicide or like cutting themselves off of russian pipeline gas. and then they actually did it. and every day the repercussions of that are still sells. as this industrial founder just explained this week,

your semester federal kind of goes to. ringback everybody's leaving pets, chemicals in your just, i've never seen him all working for america or in a great place manufacturing because she knows that, but she finishes, i know. colvin texas is really important for me to call him at the end of the. so it looks like the figures that as long as it makes enough noise about anti rushing sanctions and sticking it to fortune. most people probably just don't bother to look beyond their words. so following through with something stupid and self serving isn't really all that necessary. and in fact, they might even be able to find a way to make some money off of some scamming games that they happen to come up with. as a result of all of this, but we got reaction to the latest use sanctions from strategic policy research or public cred. pain comes from india, which itself has been buying plenty of freshman energy supplies. or even though we

have been one of the biggest import the while for a long time during the period that they impose sanctions onrush in order to begin one of the biggest export does. because the same you young countries where the buying that allows us generalize via india. so the show i was coming to india and continue to find you and then it was being sold it to you to be on countries. similarly, were never done this time is that they are ensuring that the most general adoption gas comes on. and the reason why they would only prevent is that the option for you will be enforced, cannot exported to full of full touch countries. so, you know, with they asked, ignoring themselves while ensuring that doesn't get home, which is very unfortunate and that's why i read through it that i don't think that the government of india really rebuild their sanctions. they've been fine. some of the gotten his uncle and ensure that india's of energy backs and what they, what they are with russia or other countries will continue in spite of these functions. i don't think that we will just be new to abide 100 percent of buy one

of the feelings of the west decide i think that it is born and i think you're not indications i've been given by the government or the last few years. that'd be, i'm not going to accept it then probably. that's one of the reasons that we have allegedly seen, not into effect as from the west when it comes to the indian addiction this time because of what happens. they don't like it, but it isn't the interest of india that india has to take strong. stand on the right to guys that were dozens of casualties have been reported in the southern most city of rafa, as is really tanks and drones pushed deeper into neighborhoods. now this video captured the moment um, is really rocket hit, a residential building there, the dead and wounded. how being transferred to a hospital in neighboring con eunice unrest. yours are searching for those. still shopped under the rubble local authority. save a total death told in the unclear of sense of to for 7 has risen to almost

$37400.00 people and claim most of them are children and women. now this gives us really a sense of the scale of the destruction of profit policy and in media report states that over 70 percent of the cities infrastructure has been destroyed since the idea of expanding its operation into the area. no rough uh which one is hosted of a 1500000, display scouts and is becoming empty or every day, according to recent united nations data, most of the families who fled the area did so within the past 6 weeks, it's estimated that only some 65000 of the huge number of displays who move to rafa actually remain. those have decided to stay have been describing the scenes. they're facing daily. the. so we heard the missile strikes and we all came out of

our tents. we found the fire bringing in his and his sons beds, even the iron caught fire the pots, every thing, and the flower, there was nothing left, everything was burned. when i mean, we were sleep at 1 o'clock at night when suddenly we heard the sound of screaming. we went running outside, grab the children and ran. and we found a big fire burning in front of us and there was shooting. we are staying on the land near them and people started screaming and running in the st. on the out. how long will this be last? how long will the displacement last and this is all 7 displacements so far we have been on the run since october 7th. we have from the east of con eunice, and now we will return to the eastern area and we will donate that and will not leave. it is our area and we will settle in for that because this is north of life . what happens here tonight is a disaster. shooting of the tents with their children, instructional for women, engine months as well. israel has been pushing into operation in the rough,

despite warnings by the un. i'm the international community at large. but while it's really government to express a certainty over its plans to eliminate from us, the spokesman for its new entry has made a striking statement, saying the militant group is impossible to destroy in any other claim is deceptive towards the public. to come us there to say we're going to make a mass disappear, limit please simply throwing sand in the eyes of the complex law. the mast is an idea to mass is a policy. it's rooted in the house of the people to have a thing. so we can eliminate the mass is wrong. a storm here in israel, following how guys interview his skepticism over israel, kansas to destroy him, us 8 months, up to the rule started cause and a pro and social media with users. question. and if this person actually could represent a body that fights him, ask them that is responsible for elimination is probably to come the public little

bit and to prevent concerns over potential split. it's been military and the government isn't here whose office was quick to respond. that's one of the key goals of the worrying guys of wasn't, remains the destruction of how massive military and governance capabilities and, but the army is of course committed to this. and the idea of who is also pushed to respond. they confirmed, suffice. they fights to and have mouse in the palestinian enclaves very fine. but gary's concerns touch the phone, her mouth as an ideology, as an idea, as if any, all the claim is taken out of context. but despite these attempts to switch the issue on to the cost, so this isn't the 1st time that we see sort of tension is between provenance there until the defense officials over the baby's approach to the goal is a conflict. a may is really mil to resources reported. it may, it may take up to 3 years to the size of the just see time us and god. they also complains that there is no conclusive political solution regarding does

a war. and that the armies achievements are eroding. and also when the army that started the war i have from the north of the gaza strip. as you remember eliminating all gradually pushing militants to the south to the junction for the head to return to areas previously cleared off. have mass hi gary, idea of spokesman again hang to the lack of political strategy is to play. and also defense minister earlier urgent is on the yahoo to present plans for post war governance of gaza warning that all army efforts will be free places. there is no clear understanding what is the alternative to the military, the group that has been to building this 3 for more than 15 years in the so called day after, but from and a student and yahoo and other politicians same not to cut too much about any officer, despite also global concerns of a post 4 scenarios, they keep rates are rating, the goal is to destroy some us, whatever that means,

and whatever comes after that they can listen to. despite the heavy and unsettling prize, we must clinch to the goals of the war, the destruction of the mass, military, and governing capabilities. the return of all of our hostages, making certain that gather will never again constitute a threat to as well. and the return of our residents securely to their homes in both the north and the south. and we will continue with our mission to destroy some us the prominence was very clear about that and we will continue on. so rough uh we will destroy from us 1st tracing enough 9 months into the war. none of these announced goals has yet been achieved. and ultimately the country's military question, the government's strategy or lack of stress and chain guys are certainly public discontent. grows thousands of and grand for straight. it is really speak to the streets and the last month, almost daily, demanding prime minister to step down, accusing him of being unable to finish the war. he started failing to defeat him,

us and bri hostages. back home. the rays of feeling that is real is stuck and goes on and people blame the government for that. of course and level strategy was among key reasons. also for prominent opposition leader unity policy leader, former defense minister guns to withdrawal from the countries emergency decision making. center war cabinets that was indicating clear or disagreements with the political circles, as well as a very hard situation right now. and of course, the pressure on attend yahoo to find a way out of all this, all out crisis from politicians, from military and from ordinary citizens, continues mounting let's know. speak to is really relations research are um former goals and inhabitants while lead. say you're welcome to the program. what do you make of this? the idea so openly defying the is really prime minister stated goal of totally

eliminating how much, how significant could this risk actually turn out to be as well. thank you for having sure to begin with the different duncans to look at this. the 1st one is uh, stated the better the before the uh, your hosting is that the difficult list between the at the existing camps does it so it didn't. yeah. so that when you get a small package on the, the one side or the other side, we have the gods advising funds would have also and withdrawn strong. but the wood cabinetry essentially. and this contention is nothing but the, the presentation, the floating around what's been happening on think it on the inside the inside cause of that lot of amenities is side to accomplish anything done any

of the up just to publicize to that. but if that is the aspirations for that is that i need to come in and that's it. is that, that deadlock as an addition to this condition and happening in the side inside. there's a way to see that the minds, the, the, the, the exchange between the hostages and the addition of the dice today because of a sudden cost. so this is the contention between those 2 sides is, is the escalating the id, but happy to reach your phone if that is, in addition to uh, the issue because of, with the, the inability of increasing the, it is a limited duty personnel. the, when it comes to the side of the inside, in addition to the, the escalation and those involved with the bundle of all these others. where does that lead to the.