Skip to main content

tv   Direct Impact  RT  June 21, 2024 7:30pm-8:01pm EDT

7:30 pm
as an insult to the people, most of the car, particularly the black people of certification applicants in particular, philadelphia guys, the constitutional democracy. so the guy has a bill of rights. so the guy has said that a lot of things paid speech. and i know that he's already been reported to very upset human rights institutions. and he would have to face the full my top, the little whether this will be going, escalating into the future. i doubted very much because this country is very in total of him or for braces to be such as to be we would say that for, for kids, a supportive of the government of national unity because they'd like to see the country that with the country that leave us services for, for the people and the country that maintains our strong geo political position. that is south africa is smaller country that we have made
7:31 pm
a significant contribution to in various dunces or um, our own president has been main page as a negotiate uh, excuse me, carpeting. and so the car has been hailed intentionally for various positions. it has to, you can even when those positions were not popular with setting of superpowers, the fact that we are going to be working together in government, it would suggest that there's a have see that the level of my charter tea that is prevailing in our country side is a rock on this also on that, those stories and much, much more video is off as you name it. why don't take a peek at all to don't come until the rest of your weekend the
7:32 pm
the, the hi everybody. i'm rick sanchez. this is direct impact and this is what we're going to be talking about today. one new pulse suggest vice president comma le harris isn't performing much better. see, i'm not sure i saw that coming. i think that's fascinating. so what actually are
7:33 pm
the vice president's approval numbers? they are good. i'm going to show them to you. i'm rick sanchez. let's do this thing . the okay, here we go. once again, it's a topic that's been in the news a lot lately mister by the president of the united states. looks he's got an image problem right now. and, and the problem is what people are seeing on video with their own eyes. the white house says eyes and the rest of us in the media who show you these images are distorting reality, that these are fake pictures, is what essentially the white house spokesperson said just the other day. are we really? so once again, there is a video that is being shared all over the country really all over the world, which is very damaging to the president. and it's sad, right? i haven't shown you this video because i, i just,
7:34 pm
i just felt uncomfortable. i almost feel like i'm picking on an older person, you know, like one of my parents or grandparents. but now this has become more newsworthy because well, there's a new report out about the b p. come along harris. so 1st, let's look at the video here. it is now you can see everybody there singing and everybody's, you know, wide awake and everybody's excited and he's just like, standing there. this is bored. no movement whatsoever. and people have looked at that and said, wow, now look at the, for, look at the, the vice president. she's dancing, she's getting a group on, she's actually looks like she's got a lot of rhythm and she's a pretty good dancer. right? so, all right, that's, that's the picture. i mean, look, it is what it is. you're watching it, right? you saw the 2 things that you saw come on harris. what appears to be, you know,
7:35 pm
uh at least compared to the president uh, showing a lot of bigger and you know, she's someone who is moving a lot. but unfortunately, and here's where the rubber kind of meets the road on this story. her poll numbers are not that much better than the guy who doesn't move so well. watch this. as concerns over president fines age continued to hang over his re election campaign. one new poll suggest vice president comma le harris isn't performing much better. a political, more than consult survey found 52 percent of those asked, viewed, vice president harris on favorably. now of course these rocking numbers can't and won't keep harris off the campaign trail. politicians tend to sold or through such things, sold your throw such things some interesting way only uh, cbs news, which basically works for the state department would present this story the way
7:36 pm
they do. and then if you were to watch the entire thing, you'd see that they're rather apologetic in their presentation of the story. but here's the bottom line and they can't deny it. nobody else can only 40 percent. only 42 percent of americans approve of her performance. this is according to political and warning console. these are legitimate pulse, a terrible. i mean, that's terrible. i mean, and i don't get it. is she being dragged down by maybe mr. biden's health problems? is it her performance? what do you think? manila, what is it? because these are really bad numbers for a, b, p, v, p, usually they, they don't usually matter enough to get either really good or really bad numbers, but these are really bad numbers. well, well, work, here's the uncomfortable thing, right? is, has america or the world yet thought that if joe biden wins another term, if he were to die in office, i know that's a crazy thing to say. but if he dies in office and the 2nd term, that means we get
7:37 pm
a president, comma harris, and these polls further go to the bulk this whole ages. i'm saying that all america is hating on an old person. that's not the case because cala harris is young and vibrant. she's even a good looking lady. yeah. still don't like or nobody. and i mean, nobody wants combo a harris and i can tell you as a california native, she was a very unpopular ag making so much good use of the old 3 strikes law that was established in 1994. and when she was running against bite and in the, in the 2020 primary destroyer she couldn't win. yeah, she called went on home state california because according to polls she had, she dropped out 3 months prior to avoid humiliation. after tolten gabbert aid, her lunch at those debates, democrats just have nobody else rec, do you know, would you know what i think what i see her, especially since she's been vp part of that, i barely knew what she was. uh huh. i see someone who is surprised that they're the
7:38 pm
vice president of united states. i. oh, i'm sorry, but she like somebody who looks in the mirror when it goes, oh my god, i'm the vice president and she goes around. i can hear you exactly. i maybe is to me, but i mean, she doesn't, her persona doesn't fit the role. she doesn't look like she has any of that drama time, but i'm not, i don't want her to be dick cheney trust me, but there's still in the way. she's always laughing. uh huh. i related with joe and she's good lab. she just, she looks like she's a very, very uncomfortable. yeah. i don't know what it is, just like comfortable and, and i think whatever i'm feeling because i'm just an average idiot. right. i think the rest of america looks at that and says, yeah, there's something there that just doesn't add up with her. so anyway, here's, here's something else. this is important. russian, president bush must have been watching my show yesterday. i doubt it, but it, but regardless,
7:39 pm
these kind of saying the same thing that i mentioned yesterday when i said that it's amazing that people who live in western countries know so little about this guy, good or bad. few of any know his actual points of view. do you ever hear him speak? i mean, watch this news conferences or watchers news conferences, i should say that, and that's just not smart, mr. brewton. he's now in vietnam. he is continuing, is his a 0? i am asked me whatever you want to or at any talked about this very thing yesterday . coincidentally, here it is c as in some settlement, them in level them, most of them got a new point in front of months and then i need you to those, to the girl and the queen for months it was more than the item what you still got a games for some really you get to me and then see if they can see us in the i even the, we only it will be due to the mean, the instruments on the important he's saying russia and they in particular,
7:40 pm
i think, has an information problem not the i think what he's saying is how do we get this message out? how do we get people to pay attention to at least our point of view, even if they disagree? well, i mean, look wrecked. the tucker interview was really the 1st major exposure put in, got to a western audience for years. western media had maligned him as some sort of like a dr. able character and, and had in effect, banned him from their airwaves. and as with any russian related media, right, just as those tensions with ukraine ramped up ahead of b. s. m o, back in february, and by the way they want to do but by the way, under the current of you to it shouldn't, the interview was over every wester. news media said, oh my god, can you believe i right? the shortened tucker and that, and after that without it was my joy, right? that's my point. poor messaging problem is not that of his own creation in the
7:41 pm
american strangle hold on hollywood and on media. and furthermore, furthermore, rick, the prudent style, what we saw on that tucker interview blunder, put, is there a new wants to very detailed? yeah, the west. we would call that long winded, but western audiences view of the world in 15 seconds. it costs flipping sound by, that's our culture. and as a result, our political discourse has also been reduced to this. i'm nothing, i agree with it, but no matter what it is. so if the russians or the chinese or north korea wish to be more impactful in reaching western. * audiences they'll need to get more adept at what appeals to those cultures. and it's, it's these quick, snappy little sound by some portion. yeah, i get this the button doing a tick, tock video. i mean, the, i know, i know, but i know you're, you're, you're, you're, you're, you're making the point to make a point. i don't think that's because it is just the, but it actually is true. sadly enough, that the fact that the guy doesn't want an hour, hour, an hour and
7:42 pm
a half long interview details the history. oh wow. yeah. and and, and, and then people say, oh i was boring is like, what do you watch? all right, here's a shocker. read it as well, or maybe just a fake announcement. i can't tell at this point, but a ukrainian and bassett, or a woman named katarina, letting go. she has come out on the record and said something that i didn't expect . she says ukraine would be willing to attend a piece summit sponsored by china, where you, courtney, and officials would be face to face with the russian officials to negotiate a peace deal. here's a statement. i'm going to read it to you. it goes like this. ukraine would consider participating in a basing lead piece summit with both war insides present so long as the talks are based on the rules and the principles and try and in the un charter and international law. manila, are they bluffing? well look, rick,
7:43 pm
there are mixed signals coming from key of on these proposed china talks 1st. this is not a china only proposal. let's get that clear. this is co sponsored by brazil and the pitch that idea of yeah, in early may i had of zalinski is lot of a summit in switzerland. it is a 6 point plan that has been endorsed by a 100 countries premier. 6 early in the global south is backer. say it's a path to ending hostilities. it's critics say. china is doing rushes bidding now state department spokesman, matt miller is spinning all of this and saying china is just trying to undermine key and steal the stage. the seeing the, the new power broker. so while you have the a basset, or calling china a friend of ukraine, you have the so called president of ukraine, who his, i would say you search power for the last month. say he's going to follow the lead of his finance years, namely the us and u. k. so the question is whether or not the,
7:44 pm
the interest in attending these new round of talks is sincere. i can't answer that . i don't know to be a master. i can't get it or bad, but my read is that she's expressing what the parliament of ukraine wants, those who are still in their official capacity and saying what zelinski can't say. yeah, and i think it may have something to do with the unmitigated disaster. as you mentioned, that was that swiss summit where they invited a $160.00 only 9 the showed up of those $9080.00 of them signed the a court to have now backed out. china wasn't invited, russia wasn't invited. i mean, the china was invited and they just to get a little they said, if you're not going to have rush to hear what the hell you're doing. right. and i mean, yeah, we're wasting our time, which is kind of a general question. we're going to have a fight between 2 great boxers, but only one of them is going to show up who wants to go? i mean, what if it, if it is interesting that this is being presented now with follow it,
7:45 pm
we'll see if it's legitimate and we'll see what happens. uh as usual, uh, have a great weekend partner. i appreciate you sharing your thoughts. take care. all right, i'm going to join a guest here real quick and i'm going to be talking to him. now he's got a different explanation than i do regarding why mister pool has visited and sign a pack with north korea pod, castor and journalist or rig sarah will be joining us here. in fact, uh there he is going to be having a conversation in just a little bit and i look forward to it cuz this is one really smart guy who writes some pretty interesting stuff. we will be right back. the take a fresh look around his life kaleidoscopic isn't just a shifted reality distortion by power type vision with no real opinions. pictures. design to simplify will confuse really once a better wills,
7:46 pm
and is it just as a chosen few fractured images presented as 1st? can you see through their illusion going underground? can the russian states never as tight as one of the most sense community best? most i'll send, send up the, in the system to progress be the one else calls question about this. even though we will ben in the european union, the kremlin media mission, the state on the russia to day and split the ortiz full neck, keeping our video agency roughly all the band on youtube, the payment services. for what question did you say to stephen twist,
7:47 pm
which is the one you ended up to attempt to collect as business exit a month? i thought she sat there for the show and then it will be a job to loss mitigation of a of a dish. uh, international stuff is defensive to supplement the setup button and not to mention the button once. did you lose your task like that? if i said the media, i love people, there's only 2 reasons to do. say you need to be sure to be present the deals for the work you've done. stimulus the industry,
7:48 pm
is it a less money? proof of concept really left? so should william farmer shots might give us who we have court glass door to go over? what decision did my name and what was that man? what was that ridiculous funds? i put it in the midst of them one today and but you know, so that's what it was that you want to set up. and she was the 2nd shop. jimmy was on page duty for she's getting the best do what i mean. there's a shaft the hey, welcome back. i'm rick sanchez. and joining us now is drake 0 amar? he is a pod, castor and the journalist writes with a very fresh perspective about global affairs. you can read his material out on the 9th wave, but that's who he uh what, what's he right? what he writes as in some stack, i am a subscriber, so i've had a chance to read some of his writings and i,
7:49 pm
and i think it's kind of fascinating. let me start with what i mentioned as we were going to break. i was reading with interest your article about why mr. clinton went to north korea. i have been sharing my opinion that he went to north korea because he simply message at the same reason he said ships into havana. the same reason he's doing military exercises off of the caribbean, he's basically telling the world, look, i do have muscles and i'm going to show them to you. you're saying it's something else. it's about satellite communications with north korea. explain um my, my main argument is that uh, there are many reasons why you went and i think i actually really feel why the reason is office the with everybody has been pointing out in the west and the russians have some of the rise in would be f be talking about and the own media, which is that is a gesture towards the best and generally in particular to the rest, the age, the pacific region that suggests that towards the united states, it's
7:50 pm
a tester towards south korea, japan, maybe to an extent, australia all of these things in play here, but i think what has been overlooked is something that is again, which is that my sense is that it's in particular also aiming at south korea. because south korea in recent years has really ramped up. it's almost exports as quickly as a very serious military industrial complex pocky because of its own geo political situation on this, you know, for the lines of north korea. and it has a very substantial industry. and it, since the ninety's, it has made an effort to make a technologically cutting edge of this basically it seems succeeded materialism tested, but they can bid, 4th generation fighter jets. they can build network centric tags and so on and so on. and the 2 things about south korea that i think doug certainly important
7:51 pm
for us as long as that sounds cool. yeah. as i'm officially, but it's very likely that they've already applied supplied military supplies to ukraine, of course, versus 5 to train by now. but the other thing that is often overlooked is the poland is wrapping up. it's military massively holding this plumbing in a relatively short time to dump it as a size actually more than double the size of its length. forcing is uh, and it is also taking them out this advice, extremely high cost for this position. so i've talked about spending at least 4 percent, maybe 5 percent of g d, p on this new arguments problem. and, and the very large amount of these weapons of these advanced button systems is going to come from south korea. so gives you just one figure. it includes
7:52 pm
100-1000 main, better tanks. right? that is an extreme number i think. so it's $58.00 1st generation pilots. it includes almost $300.00 howard. so systems and so on and so on. and so more over pulling that south korea have already agreed that much of these materials in the bigger it's actually important on the license, right, so that's also technology transfer from this volume on south korean house industry to poland and poland. do live over to the is planning already to use this know how that they've been acquired in this process. improvements the duty to become and even stronger on exports or to the rest of may to you, your, let me stop here. let me just stop here for a minute because i have a question about what you just said, because i find what you're saying to be absolutely fascinating. what you've just described, this confluence between south korea and poland, which sounds like
7:53 pm
a bit of an arms build up. is this being done at the behest of nato and washington? or are these just 2 countries that are figuring out a way to make money off of ours, which they have every right to do. it was a koreans, it certainly is making a lot of money. i mean, it's almost these contracts are brought to almost a month, almost $15000000000.00. i think it did. right. some last notice. but on the other side, all of these items will be made to compatible. right. and if you think about the politics involved, it's very easy to see that non offices could be happening if the united states was not in agreement on both sides of. so united states was not in agreement with south korea delivering and was pulling, taking this initiative to business, and almost land on it. if you think about what this looks like from russia's perspective, from us coast perfect perspective lines only like this, right?
7:54 pm
this basically, you better bring gram aiming, not only at ross so, but at russia is most important region and outline eastern europe, which has buildings well and of course, pulling has very complicated relationships with better homes. so i think that all the factors that you have in human rights on site, i don't doubt that. but that as a very specific agenda here on moscow's product concerning specifically the south korea and then 16 costs on south korea for this type of engagement. so what's interesting about this conversation that we're having is we often here are leaders here in the west and certainly in washington. and we've heard this from the white house and most definitely from the state department when put in or when she or other leaders like that say, we have to defend ourselves because it looks to us like these guys are doing some
7:55 pm
things that make us feel like they're getting ready to knock on our door or worse. right. and then the state department of washington always says they're lying. that's not true. they're using that as an excuse. they're making stuff up there, crazy, etc. or whatever it is that the reason is, and you're saying there is, as we say in law prima fall, she evidence that the west is in fact doing this. and that it is a direct threat to russia and perhaps other countries as well as you stay with beller is yes, i mean look, it's a classic this alone, right? i wanted to state can i'm, it sort of and it may even actually mean these elements to sort of defense. but from the side, from the perspective of another state, that states cannot tell if these are going to be used only for defense or for offensive purposes. as well, right, and this the, as always in playing the problem is the west is that via and denial about this fact . we expect that china, or russia, for instance, simply take all works,
7:56 pm
but no longer the government in history has taken the words of a potential problem. yeah. things this we got that would simply not be normally the security. do you did that? you know, it wasn't far as being folded and be able to answer the fact that our adverse or the, or the guy somebody has a side simply take over it for it. that doesn't make any sense. i could speak to, to a physician. i could listen to you forever because you, you obviously think a lot and write some interesting stuff about this and it is a fresh perspective. but i've got to ask you about germany. i, as i'm hearing you say that as i've read what you've written about germany and israel, for example, but now i want to ask you, what is germany stand and all of this the other day, the ukrainian strong man who's i'm elected by the way, just for the record went to germany, and apparently half of the pm's didn't even show up. they protested his speech. i
7:57 pm
didn't want them there where the germ, how much are the germans like the polls or not like the polls in this situation? i would say they're going to be like suppose, but they're not. when you look at the german ministers defense, they've got a cardboard. is the stores, i'm sure he's incredibly jealous of what his police call he can do. right. but the german situation is that the rhetoric is sometimes so elizabeth likes to pull his right to break now back to russian. very decisive and so on and so on. but the germans don't actually want to pay for this. they've been talking about this, but them not making this type of financial effort. so the gentleman on me right now is around 200000 soldiers during the cold war restaurant with a low and have 500000 and peace time. if your edit, the east germans get 200001 this side, you had 700000 terms constantly on the us,
7:58 pm
among other things to go off each of the j as well. right? so right, that was the avenue driven spot. now can't even find a way to expand the homie completely unlike the polls. so i think that from most cost perspective, hold on looks like a much more serious adversity right now. in germany, not the germany looks benevolent, but germany probably from the russian perspective doesn't look serious. pulling does actually look serious while um, drake 0 amar is a podcast or a journalist, you can write, you can read him at 9th wave on the sub stack, and we thank you, sir for taking time to take us through this explanation. please come back. i'd like to talk to you again, and i think, you know, so that's our show. remember, once again that we always believe that truths don't live in boxes. so we shouldn't look for truths in boxes. and when i say boxes, i mean only what we think and what our friends think truths are everywhere. that's
7:59 pm
what we believe that's our mission. i'm rick sanchez. thank so much for being with us. i'll be looking for you again, right here on direct impact until next talk to the in a very public light, israel's prime minister benjamin netanyahu, as demanded the bye, didn't ministration give him the tools to finish the job in gaza because there's a demand to finish the genocide, again, this sounds like
8:00 pm
a blank trip to cross skinny and all the his old as a french and you can appeal to on to apply compet banes. i mean one of the walls, largest of a rainy of mine. i'd say it's upright, some nice clusters as it has the right to supply long range westlan. so allies lie still young in response to west an escalation. that would be great. what's going on lower than eastern asia and beyond currently is twice in terms of exponential growth of military activities by the us and the regional allies. the.

9 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on