special military operations actually for the pandemic. and of course there has been some changes, but in general we cannot complain. it seems to me and i hope i'm not deluding myself that we are more or less in control of the situation for i repeat, we are working hard to see as before, russia plays a very prominent role. activities of the international organizations in vienna presented. everyone recognizes this, so it has become a bit more difficult, but we are managing it out. i think that the audience will be interested in such understand and a little bit what has changed is how so where did you say something have changed to this or the scope and one way move with the most striking example of this is that meetings of specialized bodies such as the one commission on narcotic drugs, international atomic energy agency, c meetings of the governing council. and others usually begin with western statements of a political nature and of the statements that have nothing to do with the mandate. the bodies in which these statements are made up. of course, we have the right to respond and we have rather intense heated discussion serious

but strictly speaking, our work in the work of the western countries is not about this. such a political discussions are more appropriate at the you, in general assembly, perhaps the on security council. but this happens, i repeat within those bodies which is by definition you should not get involved in big politics close to nothing to this not. i'm curious about your opinion about what some in the wasn't impressed cooling. the terrifying stuff is something marine referring to the recently launched russian nuclear submarine not hunger. so i'm good. how do you sing these demonstration on the russian military on navy power influences the one to 2 months to upset the court movies? oh, stupid special. well, i don't know how much effective can house, but the fact that such a demonstration is useful and necessary isn't absolutely certain. we need to remind them that we're not playing silly games. this is a very serious situation. so the west is entering into a confrontation with the largest nuclear power, and that is probably

a good idea for them to remember. that is, that is demonstrations are useful. but it is important, of course, to plan them very carefully and to conduct them in such a way that they do not escalate uncontrollably so far. i think we have been quite successful in doing that. the most those up i did. yes, sir, because in the west it is often interpreted as russia is to prepare and then it has happened. the 1st step of the display was the now, but this is their world view condition. and we should also bear in mind that, of course we are dealing with information warfare issue, which all means are good in the, in their opinion. the. yeah, that's pretty, let's move on to this is tory as you've trained, paste some. indeed, with the issue of nuclear security was this cost. uh, what do you think of it this advance to which i chose russia was not invited. yup. this to me. i will give it enough for a solid effort for that. as far as discussing issues of peace without the participation of one of the 2 parties to the conflict is nonsense,

an absolute nonsense which is a p r starting to feel completely pointless or rather hurtful. and that is how the international community saw it. as far as i remember, the invitations were sent out to 168 countries. out of those $92.00 delegations actually showed up and many of them, far from the highest level domains joined communicate released at the end of the virgins documenting, there's only signs, white and 80 countries. 12 of the most influential countries in asia and africa and latin america refused to sign the documents that issue. and the day after the summit ended in rock and jordan withdrew with their support with one of the following suit a couple of days later. so that gives us a total of $177.00. if you read the joint statements in the joint communication with it, it's hard to hold back tears and the whole thing was not worth bothering so many delegations for should. it is a trivial document, a very little political significance test for the discussion of nuclear issues that this meeting local today, these discussions and the documents itself,

the relevant section of the r very bay, no indeed is no revelations. they're telling lee and i a director, general rafael grossing for refused to attend the event of the explained to the decision in an interview with the printing mass media using the i a, a performs very serious technical tasks and who stays away from political matters far from the agencies mandate, i think this is the right to position. i feel i've never been absent it's, i was just about to bring up this cause this situation of disapproval. she nuclear power, the tongue, which is a hot topic right now, of course, because this worries rushes corporation with the i a and you're supposed to be particular with direct to grow. say to me, you just mentioned that there was interview who did shooting this to me. you know, our relationships with mr. grossey looks quite constructive. should enter business like to me. of course, in our opinions of assessments and approaches do differ from time to time, which is normal degree of support. anyway, grossey believes that the agency should maintain relations with both ukraine and

russia, especially with russians, which is a major nuclear power as a country with a powerful nuclear energy industry. we've got a country that builds numerous power plants abroad. we communicate regularly, mr. grossey has regular meetings with alex say we have to over the head of los angeles. besides missing rosie has mentioned twice would be the president of russia . the last meeting took place on march 6th instructions. in other words, i think our working relationship is very good. this however, does not mean that we have no disagreements on certain issues here from this i repeat that isn't absolutely normal. the main thing is that both we and semester grow. so you have a spirit of business cooperation, and in my opinion it is working out in general through what of us and god like, i can't, the problem was done this disagreements cause any problem. yeah. to be as tactile corporation in any way, and it's just going to be, well, of course they do, for example, we're not satisfied with the way mr. grossey is regular reports on new colors

safety can ukraine are prepared to do? they describe the situation at this approach in newport power plants and the facts lead forth on these reports, and the assessments in them so sometimes leave much to be desired. more recently, including, thanks to our ongoing work, certain misrepresentations has been gradually corrected and the reports are becoming more honest and objective so, so i do not see anything really dramatic. she's in this regard. see me coming up. there has been a lot of discussion and was simply about the possibility of for launch and exactly launch impulse planet that most of the chances of social listen to that is a good question. thank you. the thing is that i'm not quite sure why, but there have been some strange allegations in the western press. allegedly, the russian federation decided to bring the reactors back online. she never had such an intention. in fact, this is this information. the issue was discussed between mr. grossi and me for the last time on may 28th, and colleen and grad, where the director of general met with the russian entered group delegation as the

outcome of that discussion. so both sides confirmed publicly just in front of the process. the common opinion that it would be premature to restart is that version of the power plants, reactors. now, it wouldn't be too dangerous, given that ukraine never stopped attacking the power plant. if operating nuclear reactors get damaged as a result of such strikes, but the consequences could be terrible. so we're not going to rush the relaunch of the power plant because there is, will produce liberty loops and nobody men with us from the same time as well. so see you praying trying to deprive russia of its membership on the board of governors in the international atomic energy agency bought them. what did they try to do that to week or so? it seems to me that ukraine has largely lost his expertise. and from time to time and take some exotic steps that are either under feasible or completely unjustified . we see this and a number of international organizations, including the i a, a board of governors or the trainings began to promote the idea that rush out. so

as an so called aggressor and occupier, the country that sees this operation, nuclear power plant, cannot have a seat on the board of governors. what they were saying goes against that by a statute, according to which a dozen countries are not elected. but a pointed to the board of governors on a permanent basis every year. and the only criteria for pointing a country there is that a countries level of nuclear energy development is sufficient to russia is among the leaders come this regarding facing, which is why it has been on the board of governors. never since that i a was found, it was interesting is that keeps for least thought out possession was strongly posed by all members of the board of governors. all the $34.00 countries, other than ukraine, including western countries like the west western countries admitted and clear. and so what if you crane keeps pushing the issue or brings it to a vote. and the western countries themselves, the little village in favor of russia, i agree, but not until then did the ukrainians back down there. and they had an excellent

chance of getting themselves into a very stupid situation, additional things. so there's a stubbornness, lack of common sense and necessary expertise level. so what are your thoughts as to what looks like you cringe and ask you sometimes do things without running them by washington says, what are your thoughts that equals to me. oh, we better pass the washington and keep about that. lead probably to coordinate most things, but there are situations when the tail starts to wag the dog and things like flying expression. i don't know what they were counting on. i repeat, it was a very poorly thought out initiative that was doomed to fail. but apparently, cubes level of understanding of the current situation is not sufficient to make reasonable conclusions. they almost pushed themselves into a trap, the infrastructure. imagine if all these 34 member countries of the governing council to them except ukraine grew and voted in favor of russia against the ukrainian approach. the would have been an embarrassment of the epic proportions

and ukrainians had almost created themselves. curtis here had that's right. and on the whole issue on the nuclear energy, which on the age of most, yvonne and its nuclear programs that you had on this site. the, the i a recently adopted an on to you ran into resolution, see it on, can you talking to us to little bit more about this? cuz why is this the i a, a choose to go this way? let me just go to sleep to publish it. well, i can tell you that the board of governors is composed in such a way that by sheer arithmetic institution majority belongs to the western countries and all western countries to corners from washington dc, paris, london, tend to berlin. once the order is given relief following, without thinking much about the consequences, this is just the way it is. because it is, in this case, since the 3 major european powers of germany, france, and the okay. for some reason decided that it was necessary to send a strong message and to t. ron and the timing was really bad. country barely finish morning,

the depth some of their presidents and foreign minister. so the vote didn't go was plans for you to or it's true that the resolution was adopted by 20 voters also. but during and previous volt, november 2020 to 26 nations voted in favor of the resolution was as opposed to only 20 this time. also in 2020 to $5.00 nations, abstained tennessee, while this year issue a total of 12 countries did. so russia and china voted against the resolution. the titles secure supply because the resolution is meaningless to form woods. this is a typical example of megaphone diplomacy is not reopened, let me see. and this resolution built a serious blow to the relationship between the i a and iran, or send me by the sheer fact of being there. and even regardless of the content and you, our approach is completely different. we are betting unreal diplomacy. this is a more promising track to follow him, but we have failed to prevent the resolution from being adopted to the tend to run has already responded to this resolution by taking

a number of steps to ramp up as peaceful nuclear programs and see if this is what your pin powers wanted, then we can congratulate them on their success for a cox, so they can more side as it is. and how can this disagreement between the i a, a in the runs to be resolved, i have, or as long as the west insist on not talking to a wrong. roughly speaking, everything will continue. and the same thing is it was worthwhile. it's really hard to calm their relationship with a ron a dialogue that's more of an attempt to dictate to the west as well. and iran as a country that does not respond well to dig taps. therefore it and this line of action is doomed to end up in failure. the vienna talks on the nuclear deal and went on for almost a year and was from april 2021 to march 2022. i was the head of the russian delegation and so you know, it was a tough negotiation. but by march 2022. the deal was almost completely ready. unfortunately, it's hard to say exactly, but i believe it was like 95 percent or even 98 percent ready when we were in the

home stretch when the negotiations were broken off. and so she's in, by the fall of 2022, it became clear that this was a conscious decision made by the european powers and the us in the meantime. can ron and china and russia worse and remain ready to continue talks net? if negotiation process isn't ever resumed once there is political will to do so, there is still every opportunity to restore the nuclear deal to everyone's satisfaction. by the way, if this were to happen in the sixty's and all of these claims, almost all the claims made by the west against the ronda would be cleared in a matter of months. all of them. so in fact, in the west positions is hypocritical and has no leg to stand on because the powers of the west on the one hand are driving a wedge between the 8 and run it through hitting on the other hand, they're accusing are on the model since despite the fact that a run is ready to settle all issues through negotiations, iran and will be willing to return to the original parameters of the nuclear deal,

such as long as the usa withdraw skids illegitimate sanctions. and we almost got there and she was going to go, she ations was wrecked the last moment. beautiful principals, the entire responsibility for that slides with western countries. so to be the hands of the most dangerous consequence of this is that the resulting uncertainty is brought with uncontrolled escalation. we have a very explosive situation on our hands now. useful, let's say we were wondering again, why is that? what's the next for the, what is the thing is if they can get what they want from me wrong and they know with you and you just said it was pretty so much of 90 percent on jail book. almost everything was really good news. so why not go for it? you have to do the issue of the, i think there are 2 reasons. the 1st is the geology, underlying this approach gives you some very strong ideology and that is pretty obvious. and secondly, there are big problems with the level of professionalism, pictures, the level of professionalism has significantly decreased over the last 10 to 15

years compared to what we saw. and let's say at the beginning of a century, we're in the late 20th century. and that is really a tragedy if it makes sense for all the involved parties to approach negotiations from a rational positions or yet in the case of the uranium nuclear programs to the position of the west is in many aspects of irrational. in fact, by launching a massive campaigns against iran, the u. s. pushed a wrong to step up its nuclear program and well ahead of its own financing. the responsibility lies entirely with washington. see if they did it on their own. it is a completely absurd situation, but that is the reality issue. it was patient with us for the 1st smith. it's been 6. yeah. since you west withdrew from the nuclear deal with the wrong the blessing . yeah. well the house has changed. i mean, is the west and inclusive and so the way from resolving these issues between america and the saying it to, you know,

i don't think supplies and administration has much to boast of mileage in terms of international policy. and they don't have any major treatments decision, but this nuclear deal was at least one particular area where the americans had a chance to make a positive break through under bite. and they began negotiating the nuclear deal and they weren't quite actively involved in those negotiations. and i would say that the american was playing it rather constructive role. that 1st, the art tough negotiators, which is just as the uranium is a tough negotiators to, cuz they weren't able to make progress together. but then the decision was made to be, i don't know whether it was for political reasons. so whether it was because some strong objections in the republican party, i don't know what happened there. because for a while there was hoping that the negotiations would resume after the mid term congress elections in the us and the run for 2022. but no, they didn't. and in response to a reporter's question, whether the nuclear deal was dead, whiting center. yes, it seems to me that this is a strategic miscalculation on the part of the united states. they have no backup

plan. they have created a situation of uncertainty in terms of both regional security in the gulf area. and international security is a serious strategic miscalculation. the same can be said about europe since at one point europe in distance that itself from trump. and his policy is he has, it has ended up being in the same boat with the americans as the current stage, as opposed to new and any other thoughts now it has, uh and finally, let's talk about russia. so cold isolation and see another boy, there was a narrative in the west, and that's last night to attend. and russia isolated because no one wants anything to do with them a score. so most of the people actually saying about that to us here in the do they believe that rush chase to truly isolate sandra, one that with this is who you know, many people do actually believe this though, i'm not sure how many implemented core things this way but if we take the general public, which is more far removed from day to day international affairs,

a few of them believe this narrative is an issue of mentality. they seem to things that the western world is the whole planet. but in reality, western countries only account for about 12 percent of the world's population, which is not that much really here in vienna. there are about 50 countries that have a strong anti russian position, some, and sometimes they must drop to 60 votes. but no more than that to say the rest of the world has very little desire to participate in these and 2 russian campaigns. many countries distance themselves from such a course which is also reflected in the vault to many countries abstain, ends in the current context. so i'm standing is almost like voting against an anti russian decision. move to another indicators that we regularly and successfully look forward to various initiatives and receive brought supports, especially in areas such as drug control. so our approach to this issue has been supported by more than 40 countries. you can see how much the liberated it is, and i'm curious about what russia has to offer in terms of drop control, then those countries, like most of the, the things we propose are quite elementary,

really efficient. it's clear that you need a balanced approach to successfully fight drugs. first, you need the efforts of law enforcement agency. that is the central aspect without which nothing will work is the 2nd. you have to take care of human rights to the rights of drug addicts are an important aspect, though not the main one. and finally, well organized medical treatment is crucial for the this is the kind of comprehensive approach that we advertise to machine in the west. the law enforcement aspect as often is completely overlooked. and they believe that the problem can be solved by dealing with human rights alone, including providing drug addicts with drugs and substantial therapy syringes so that they don't pick them up on the street just as it would get packaged as infected syringes to inject themselves to sure this is their way of looking at things because they said you obviously has had far reaching consequences as you see now in western countries, one after another. you maybe

a dozen of them so far. if these are actually violating the legally binding you in drug conventions and legalizing cannabis and marijuana, and this is, this is a direct violation of legal obligations. and in canada, they have gone even further in british columbia. they're starting to legalize harder drugs for that's why they doing this. i want to find out i need done. they see that there have been into a dead end. let me go to the ship. so when it was the show, they say they're fighting the black markets, the moving the drug trade from the black market to the gray, or even white market to be able to get additional taxes. i think it is a preferred view of the world, but it is what is happening is even the human rights aspect has become a striking example late for we started talking about the need to protect the rights of drug dealers and drug producers. that is, rock bottom doesn't get any worse than that. they've put the slogan of harm reduction at the forefront. they have already given up as a, you're believing that the harm from drugs is inevitable. and there is no need to

fight it much, only to reduce the harm a little we and many other countries have a different feel so that the task is to prevent harm in the 1st place. and we see our goal, our um vicious mission was building and drug free society. of course, it's hard to do that in real life. but if we're going to set goals that we should set them high, are you watched? and they have already raised the white flags in advance and are only fighting to make the harm a little less suitable. so we have more than 40 countries under our banner, and it turns out that we have to do this is difficult for any other country that shares our approach to lead such a movement. and they trust us. recently, for example, we initiated the adoption of a strong statement on combat in the summer full bmw, which was co sponsored by 34 islamic countries. can this be called installation? of course not. this assertion is very far from the truth to, there is no installation, but there are certain difficulties in relation is mainly with western countries.

abuse as long as will be was this, we came and talking about multiply receipt of i. so your colleagues and you see it, do they believe that the world is a really change and the dynamics of building relationships between different countries? i'm good friends now, can i? when do they think it's some kind of fairy tale that the kremlin and sit down and look at people in reality as we said and they're isolated and no one wants to deal with the emotions, any of them a, just a good is to be honest. i don't think we even discuss this issue with other delegations. our agenda is a very practical one because there are specialized international organizations, all kinds of commissions and committees. and we prefer to deal with issues that fall within their purview as to what they think in the west. i think there are different people in the west. some are able to assess the situation more accurate. the language, in my opinion, was the trends towards dismantling the american had gemini, this audience. we see manifestations of this trend at every step. and so of course,

there is not a single event. there are processes that are spread out over time. but the trend is quite obvious and so, and it is quite obvious that new centers of power are hearing on the world map report. russia is represented in many of them such as bricks, the seo and other groups of children. she's there seems to be no arguing against us too, but the most important thing is, and that's the reaction of the western countries to what is happening, which is sometimes hysterical. and their behavior towards the russian federation can be explained. it seems to me precisely, by the fact that deep down western countries understand that we are entering a different era from where international relations will have to be conducted different place them to say in the 2nd half of the 20th century, that most of what are supposed to find him a, it's good that they understand the things you know, it's for them to accept to the new, to accept it is the reality is life itself, the forcing them to do this. thank you very much. it was me. hey, when you all know pama, there's representative of the russian federation to international organizations,

india. now this house has always, it's very interesting to talk with you. thank you. thank you. the same just to see power and engagement equals the trail. when so many find themselves will support, we choose to look so common ground the the j. k is off the gaining independence and from the form of the ivory coast

remained under the strong influence of his foam and metropolitan pro french president. felix, who said one year, ruled the country for 33 years, ensuring the interest to from the government dean isn't it enough that there's no simple new foster larry shifting backwards was done. those who saw him a lot more appropriate after the death of, of a one year, a new lead to bill. i'll go back the ball came to power reset. and i'm ready to double open for example. yeah, curious to know if we're picking up from the was it isn't good enough for tiffany to one is the one that the bronze demetrius, the dean. good luck. boeing. enemy, a deep political crisis ensued. the walk a, the country 2nd largest city, turned into a theater of war from 130 to the

other 2 on the road results. what did, how did the dramatic events unfold? and how is walk a recovering from he is a bloody conflict. watch on. see the the water is part of the blog post good. isn't the deepest you of us and that in the word part is it something

deeper, more complex might be present? let's stop without collision. is that still part of the high acceptance? and i'm here to plan with you whatever you do. do not watch my new show search like why watch something that's so different whitelisted opinions that he won't get anywhere else. welcome to please or do have the state department to see i a weapons bankers, multi 1000000000 dollar corporations. choose your fax for you. go ahead. change and whatever you do. don't want my show stay main street because i'm probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show is called direction, but again, you probably don't want to watch it because it might just change the way you the

the rabbit collapse of the ottoman empire gave the arabs hope for independence. but the colonial bower so their future differently. great britain and france agreed on the seizure of the arab lands under the guise of the so called mandate of the league of nations. this bible play caused particular indignation in a rack, which was to get under the control of the british. in may 1921 rest with claim for independence broke out, both assuming and that she took part in it. soon the rallies turned into a real uprising against the invaders. more than 130000 people took up arms. britain urgently began to transfer reinforcements to a rack and used aircraft radius war. secretary, winston churchill urge the use of chemical weapons against the rebels. and general

ser i on their hel dane bordered the destruction of any village where weapons were found. burning a village properly takes a long time. an hour or more according to sized paulding recalled cynically. in his memoirs, the mediaeval girl, the paid off, the revolt was crush. however, separate his empire had to make serious concessions. in 1921, it recognized bustle. the 1st, as the king of a rag time gave part of the power to representatives of the local population. v. a racket revolt marked the beginning of the national consolidation of the country and became an important milestone on the way to final independence. the to hello and welcome to the cost of full doors. here we discussed some real in the

new brain security side. it's claims that expose the plan by civil activist assumes that countries parliament and out of the car and need to ship the power as far as the national ronnie party takes the lead and the french legislative election with president law chrome 15th on the called the nations prime minister issues that stop the subject to declare our objective is clear as to prevent the national riley from obtaining an absolute majority in the 2nd round, tom and even the parliament therefore from governing the country with an various plan. it has in mind this the basement of the government definition and unity it is covered for.