to not bowling has been making headlines as the number of incidents involving its aircraft rises around the world. the federal aviation administration has opened multiple investigations into the corporations, with the us department of justice say it may filed criminal charges against the company because of ongoing quality and safety. safety is not bullying. manufacturing processes have been on issue of concern with employees, accusing the corporation of putting prophets over safety radio. we spoke to a bullying, whistle blowers add pearson and joe jacobson, who sounded the alarm over bullying plain quality gaps of the department of transportation and united states. as this is the overseer of the fx, and what we've seen is the department of transportation is completely unengaged. they're just not disengaged. they're, they're, they're, they're standing on the sidelines like spectators. they're not really doing anything, notably from

a leadership perspective and taking appropriate action. they're kind of just sitting back and waiting, so obviously the direction where the wind blows and then they jump in and point out the obvious. we gave them $35.00 recommendations. um, you know, we identified 35 problems and 35 recommendations. and it's to far as we concern they have done none of these. they've ignored all. so what happens is these people go, they continue to do with their what they're doing. they continue to get away with making very poor decisions, gross negligence. i'm putting the prophets in front of safety and the risk and everybody's lives. i avoid the, the boeing max and that's because i've been tracking all of the in flight issues since it went back into service. i was part of the re certification effort. and i know there's still some safety concerns with the design, but there's also manufacturing defects that we've been tracking. boeing is an incredibly important company for united states. so no one wants to see

boeing fail because it's, it's too big of a blow to the united states economy. and that's the big. now we'll see you again. that's what we'll be all with more stories. why not the the hey, everybody on bins one in for rick sanchez and hear the stories we're covering today . the,

well, would you be just under julie massage, walks free after 12 years in exile, 5 years and solitary confinement. american muscles are implicated in the depths of innocent lives in russia and argument attempt to overthrow the government in bolivia. it's been a wild week of ripping stories, and we're recapping it all right here. this is direct impact. the okay there is a lot to talk about today and we have the perfect panel to do it web. joining me now to drill down on this makes big stories that are ignored under reported and missed reported. let's face it by corporate media. garland nixon and dr. wilmore leon, guys, thanks so much. by the way, they have their own sputnik radio show called the critical hour. and this is certainly a critical our guys, thanks for being there. let's talk about 1st of all, joining us long. she is free. the founder of we can leaks is now back home in his home country of australia, a deal with us, the us here and the justice department here requires that he pleads guilty to

a single charge of conspiracy. and in return he'll receive credit for time served. avoiding any further jail time, i'm going to ask you guys the obvious question, because the thing is here today the julian assigned to walks free. but before i ask you that question to me, it seems ridiculous that in order for julian a songs to walk free, he has to admit to a crime. he didn't actually commit any claims. he did not commit, but this was the way the justice system in the united states works right in order for us to finally stop persecuting you. you have to admit you did something wrong that this wasn't the, this wasn't the justice system. this was the political system and the justice system was used for political ends. it's not only that he did not commit the crime, the evidence show that he did not commit the crime of conspiracy. he did, he did not conspire with anybody to take anything. he did what media outlets do. he published the information that he was provided, but in order for the,

by the administration to save face in this mess, that they exacerbated following the here on the heels of trump. then this is the the abuse of the system that they had to use in order to walk away with. they now can consider and spin to be a when. yeah, well in garland if it was always a stretch, right, is what we're saying was always a stretch to say, well, he didn't actually hack any materials. he can actually take the materials. but but chelsea manning at the time, bradley many, we'd never been able to figure out how to download the stuff, had joined us on personally not walked him through it at the time. but, but there is no evidence of this whatsoever. and that this has been part of the problem in this case against the song, is that not that he actually has classified materials, stole classified materials, but that he knew how to do it somehow and remotely talked bradley many through this process. and it was absolutely,

and not only did they not have the evidence that he did that, the witnesses that they used cars with the, with the main witness, a guy named durgy or something, whatever it was of the guy was, you know, a prophetic witness. he admitted that he lied, he was a convicted pet of, i mean, it was an absolute disaster, but i think a big part of it was they didn't want him to come to court because a, they spied on the a defense team, which means, i mean, it would be difficult to get that pets. a supreme court, you could not make an argument that he would have that he got a fair trial. i don't think they wanted to get him there because they didn't want to get in front of the supreme court. lose number one and number 2 clearly because of the election. so they got, they gotta aiken dixon of some type and they moved on because i think they knew they have enough trouble. right now, politically and joe biden was looking for this was about the election in my opinion about the 2024 election. yeah. trying to get the left flight, such as it is of the democratic party to kind of get off of his back

a little bit. yeah, i agree with you. i think it's very politically motivated. butler, again, this is what's happened with assault and what's happened with trump and a lot of his trials. what happens with the most whistle blowers in their trials, right. is that you get these, these crimes that are process crimes, right? so they never found him guilty or even got him to plead guilty to come in in the crime. it's a conspiracy charge, which means it's a thought crime. but let me say this a court had ruled that his actions had not endangered anyone. right? and so again, it's a fault crime. no one was in danger because of this, however, the state department smoked for us and matthew miller, he seemed to miss that memo. he insisted to reporters this week that a song didn't do wrong without really explaining what the wrong was. listen to this, but are you satisfied that the case is over? so look at the just the department spoken, then i don't have anything to add. obviously the, obviously the, the master pronounce the statement that said we were happy to work with our sterling colleagues on it. and that remains the case. i do think it is important when we talked about julia sons' to remind the world that the actions for which he

was indicted and for which he has now to guilty your actions to put the lives of our partners, our allies, and our diplomats at risk, especially those who work in dangerous places like afghanistan in iraq. i actually did talk to the state farm bank and i don't remember there being any public. and there was a public concern that was raised about the potential security risk. those 2 sources who might have been quoted was there actually any for did you ever discover anyone who was injured? killed had to go into hiding. so because of them, so a few things about that one. i can give you a definitive answer only because i wasn't here the time. you know, if you drive drunk down the street and get pulled over for drunk driving, the fact that you didn't crash into another car and kill some one doesn't get you out of the uh, of your direct was actions and endangerment that you put your fellow citizens and

it's the same thing. same principle applies here, right? well i, i, i don't think that it does, but the fact of the matter is that the state department has been released as far as i know. and maybe i'm wrong. but there's been, as never been able to point to anyone who was compromised or killed or, i mean the guys, there's so much wrong with everything that was just said there in that news conference. let's start with the fact that 1st of all, what kind of analogy is the, if you're driving down the street drunk and you don't crash anyone, and that has nothing to do with what we're talking about. secondly, the fact that you make a very definitive statement as the state department spokesman saying, there were lives at risk, they were partners and people whose lives were endangered. and then you say, give me an example. and he says, well, i can give you an example because i wasn't here. so then what do you even talking about please react, go ahead for. he doesn't pay, he doesn't know what he's talking about. yeah. and what this really demonstrates is the power and how far they will go to control the narrative. this is about the

story. this is about the narrative. this is not about reality. and this is the same story that's being told by the new york times. it's the same story as being told by the washington post joy of the sizes free. and julian massage uh, pled guilty. and julia, the saws put the lives of people at risk. he didn't put lives at risk. what he did was embarrass american diplomats. he, he tarnished the images of hillary clinton and then her built a and m and, and their sensibilities. this has nothing to do with putting anybody in danger or impair. all that did not happen. well, i, garland, he, he embarrassed the bush administration. he embarrass permanent, washington. he embarrassed the obama administration as well. my rightly says he, embarrassing the. the clinton's, the truth is though, is that i think you make the argument. julian,

i saw you didn't in danger. people slide see save people's lives by exposing a war in iraq and afghanistan were civilians were dying and incredibly high rate. it wasn't until a sanction which he makes were brave enough to reveal this information that the public said wait a minute. all these people who are being killed over there aren't in any combatants . they aren't so called insurgents, whatever that means. and they started to realize there are civilians in massive numbers who are being killed in these wars. i would argue that a fun save people's lives by revealing this stuff, not putting people in danger. what say you as well, and what we solve with the state department spokesman was the good think of the narrative. they all get together and they say certain things and not say he was caught flat footed when he made this statement that he put people's lives at risk with in his group. no one would say, well, give me an example. there is no, it pissed them a logical context within that group. it's simply, let's make a statement. he put people's lives at risk. he's not. obviously,

he was not accustomed to someone saying give me example of that. it was just that what was in our group, this is what we all say. this is the story. and no one's going to challenge that story or poke it that story and his group and they, and you see the state department spokesman get caught every single time someone is given the opportunity to ask a question that digs below a superficial narrative that they have. they always get caught flat footed. well, that's so well said because engine you're absolutely right because the reality is he's not used to anyone saying who with what he's talking about. and so instead he says, well, i don't know, i wasn't here. well, the why are you even talking? why are you up on this minus podium right now? talking is as if you have some kind of knowledge your expertise in this area. and i think this is again, this is a problem in permanent washington, is that there is this prevailing narrative that surrounds everything. and it's in this ridiculous kind of groups speak in which they do say things like working leaks, endangered the lives of our partners,

which he makes endanger anyone's lives. how about how about the military pilots, who are shooting journalists and in the interact and killing reuters journalists. and that's where they'll bi weekly leaks where's? where's the condemnation of that in the lives of journalists that was put on the line? the danger comes to the 1st amendment, the in terms of the attack on the freedom of speech. the danger comes as americans are not being told the truth by their government about how their tax dollars are being spent. how atrocities are being committed in the, in the names of american people. and unfortunately, there are too many people in the press corps that are so desperate for excess that they won't do with that state department reported that they will question the narrative. they will not put those individual standing at the podium or at the dies on point and ask them you just said something. now can you provide data to support it? they won't do that because they want to be sure that they get to ask questions. they

don't want to get the reputation of going against the graeme and not following the narrative. well, i hear you guys are both right about that. you're both very brave journalists in your own right. but the reality is, is that when you have this is merging of, you know, permanent washington, the bureaucratic state, the state and these agencies that run everything with the media, which we've seen now for at least 20 years, where no one questions, anything anymore that's, that's precisely the problem, but guys, let me hold you over because don't go anywhere. when we come back, we're going to delve into the controversy surrounding us missiles, emotionally used to kill civilians in ukraine. plus we're going to unpack the dramatic, failed to attempt that rock south america. this week, our panel returns after the break to discuss these pivotal events, say to the

the hello and welcome defrost of full force here. we discussed some real in the

east of come to the russian states. never as one of the most sense community best ingles, all sense and up the in the 6595 must be the one else calls question about this even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin media mission, the state on the rushes to day and supports the r t. suppose next, even our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube tv services for the question, did you say a request, which is the

and welcome back to direct impact on bins one in for rick sanchez. and this is the week and review switching gears now to southern rush over ukraine launch strikes on sunday targeting. the city of stuff is still full. at least 4 people were killed, including 2 children over a 150 people were left injured in many of them. as you'll see in this video, we're simply enjoying the end of their weekend, of the car from the body. i was relaxing at a result when i had an explosion that a 2nd explosion understood something, flew into the building from the sky. i went out into the balcony to see what was going on. everything was covered in smoke. people were screaming, i saw something full into the building. it was about the size of a bed. people were shouting your fire, your fire from all the neighboring buildings from the residential complex. people run with everything they could to put out the flames go. it is an incredible story, but maybe the most interesting part of the story though,

is that russian defense officials say the strikes were carried out using american attack in most missiles, which can only be operated. we're told by us experts, reportedly all flight coordinates need to be input by american specialist using american intelligence. so let's bring back my crew of guest now doctor wilmore leon . and garland nixon host of the critical hour on radio. sputnik. all right, let's start with you girl in here. um, i mean, obviously this is a major story if, if what is being reported is true, that these were american missiles fired by americans. that's already a big part of the story, but maybe even bigger is remember this, this strike to placing crimea. we've been told for years now that crimea was illegally amex, and it actually belongs to ukraine and it's full of ukrainians. and yet these missiles were fired. undoubtedly by ukraine, which means that ukraine was firing on their own people. a couple of things here. number one, and that is that we all know that these are, these were americans the technically as r f k, junior stated recently. that's an act of war to buyer. um for the us that this was

not ukraine, that ukraine does not have the technical capability to fire these missiles. this was the united states government firing weapons at civilians in russia. it's an active war, which is in fact, a constitutional violation because the president of the united states does not have the authority to commit an act of war without running it through congress. number one, number 2, i'll say this, the idea that your brain wants to re an ext millions of crime ends and millions of easter, a people in don best who speak russian and their, their, their, their, their, their language is outlawed and their religion is outlaw number one and number 2, if they came back in his so called democracy, they'd be allowed to vote, which means that they vote as a block and put in a but a pro russian government in, in ukraine. so even the idea that they want to re exit that they want to bring these people back into the ukranian. um, you know, a nation is in, in, in,

in of itself preposterous. uh it absolutely is a boomer, i think, to, to garlands point about this being an active war. the reality is it's not just unconstitutional for any who was president to, to engage in war without a declaration warrant congress. but that hasn't happened since world war 2. so that's not going to happen, but i think it's even more striking here though, is that they're not even admitting that they're doing it. so it's not just that it's illegal, it's that it's illegal and it's being done in secrecy as well. this goes back to the point that i made in the previous segment, and that is the united states citizens of the united states. not being told the truth about the actions that are be being taken by the american government with american taxpayer dollars and, and they aren't being told what, what is being done in their names as to the issue of ukrainian, inspiring on ukrainians to the earlier point. the garland made, these are considered to be ethnic russians. they, they speak russian, the,

they follow the russ russian orthodox church. in fact, this was done on a sunday on a holiday when the beach was crowded full of, uh, uh, crime in slash that big russian in individuals. and this was not some benign event by the united states to your point attack homes are only used by american soldiers. this was as robert f kennedy junior. so aptly said, this is in fact a war, correct? absolutely. all right, let's, let's move on here cuz we got a lot in the cover when i show you guys video that we've collected here, arm demand raid bolivian government policies in an attempt at seizing power and it fails. check this out the

. all right, so this is where things get interesting. juan jose is any guy. the alleged leader of this crew is now under arrest and claiming this was all a plot to boost the popularity of the president louise are say, the do you guys believe that or could there be other reasons behind all of this darling dofer's? well, when, as soon as i found out that the believe the government had signed a deal with russia to my lithium, i knew it's just a matter of time before the routine changed crazy over it's part of the bottom,

made their move. but this just to me so that let's just say they've lost their basketball. if you look at the information debacle, called the bay of pigs with where they sent a bunch of guys in wandering through the jungles who literally lost a gun fight to fishermen. right. and you realize that they just don't have it anymore. and now what do they do? but if you look into this, they like occupied the square in front of the presidential palace. that's how far they've got. so, i mean, it's the area of what is the origin, but a change attempt? yes. in, in, in, in, in, in practical application. if this is the best they got, i don't think they could over throw, you know, a, uh, a fast food restaurant at this point and i'm glad of that problem. it seems like that is the problem. it does seem to be getting worse. i would say if you track, especially in latin and south america, the, the competency of coons going to be in his way line this whole thing that was tried with one guy though it just, none of it makes any sense. well, no, it doesn't. and cruise, i think, have been going on in,

in bolivia 419461945, something along those lines. we know that the ball morales is waiting in the wings waiting to run for re election. and if this, if this was a cool attempt, please, no one try to present a call on my behalf with clean slaughters like this, who needs enemies? absolutely. all right, so we get a coup waters. let's say i finish up here with the us secretary of state anthony, blinking announcing a new state department partnership. you can make the stuff up with youtube music according to our press release. it is all part of an effort to further the united states elevated commitment to use music to promote peace and democracy, promoting peace and democracy through music anthony blinking. i mean, this is again, it's comical to seek this stuff will work. come on, anthony blink, and i,

when we know that he's like an amateur guitar as has something like awful guy rock band from the sixty's. but this guy working with youtube, i guessing the thing that makes it not funny to me is the fact that youtube is such a sensor around the world in terms of what they're able to do when you ever use a partnership with the state department. it's not a good thing. you know, it's not in been, i don't know why you're trying to insult amateur guitar is by calling back. i think . yeah. blinking an amateur guitar. it's. he's an amateur. yes. no question. but hamish, we're good. but the, the already here is that the body administration is on the march against social media big. but if they really want to promote peace, they would allow a free or dissemination of information within the sphere of social media platforms . but no, that's not what they want to do. they want to clamp down on media platform. so it is very ironic that they are turning to youtube music to promote peace. and i

wonder what artists are going to use to do so. well, not only what artist they use, but all the money taxpayer dollars that are going to get pumped into youtube music . now, in order to help get, again, push it up. but you know, we do something for you and you've got to do something for us. so i don't think since the 19 sixties and seventies have we actually had music that was a part of a resistance to anything that government has done. that's been pretty much wiped out, but this almost guarantees that that doesn't come back, does it not girl. yeah, yeah, and this is the larry is because, you know, as a person who does the youtube show, i can tell you the one thing that you're going to get censored for on youtube is trying to promote peace and democracy. so the idea of the page somehow thought of 180 course, and a lot of the lead a bit of i could say a 360 is kind of hard to believe. but the other thing about is this. so now tony blanking wants us to believe that he's trying to from the piece in democracy. how that going? totally blanking. i mean, let's look at his record house. tony blinker efforts to promote a piece of democracy in the world. since he's come to office working, i have

a funny feeling that if you evaluate the results of his work, you'll uh, you won't, we will come to a conclusion that either he's not good at it. or he's like, well, or, or go to generally eventually be pacing ukraine. well, there was the piece in gaza won't there. but when you get to read the, find the words piece and democracy when you create your are own meaningful those words. and i, i suppose it can be this and we're living in the time we're up is down and down is up freedom in slavery. and slavery is freedom, democracy and peace are actually tyrannical. regimes like what zalinski is running in ukraine right now. but blink is all about that stuff guys. great, having you on with us today. thanks so much for your insight. you back there next week. and that is our show for you and been swan. we'll see you next time with more stories that make a direct impact. the

hello and welcome defrost of full force here we discussed some real in the afghanistan has attracted conquerors attention from time immemorial, in the 19th century, the british empire decided to subjugate that century. the british view, the afghan lands as the northern gateway to india, and wanted to turn them into an obedient province, trying to predict the independence, the mere of a dentist in the us little homage turned for help the russia rate, the rate is considered their deal political adversary,

this was the last straw for london. britain declared war on the half gans in august 1839. the invaders occupied couple and brought their henchmen to bower. the invaders brutally suppressed. any resistance thus being is telly, they slaughtered all ask in man who had reached adulthood and raped hundreds of women seeking to humiliate the muslims of 18. 41 general uprising against the british yoke began. the british, under the command of general elton stone left couple and started to retreat. only a few out of the $16000.00 invaders who had begun their march from couple made it to the british position in general about the defeat of the royal army caused a norm is damaged to the prestige of the british empire throughout the world. the victory of the afghan people became the most important events in the history of the arrest. peebles resistance to the colonialists, it just failed the races. smith,

of the european invincibility the or the ukraine secure with the service claims it's for the applied and by active as the storm, the countries parliament and all of the current leadership. and that's somebody's questions of a lot of these. the last key is legitimacy. as time expired in may, but since the thoughts of having had an offer was really come on guys, white copy and paste folks on the, on the way to and the comp, ukraine complex. and that's according to renown. musician and activists. roger which has exclusive interview with all g and my jerry as slums of west bonanza for.