the, you know, the hey, everybody on bins one in for rick sanchez in here. the stories were covering today . # the, well, would you be just under julie massage, waltz free after 12 years in exile, 5 years and solitary confinement american muscles are implicated in the depths of innocent lives in russia and argument attempt to overthrow the government in bolivia. it's been a wild week of ripping stories, and we're recapping it all right here. this is direct impact of the okay, there's

a lot to talk about today and we have the perfect panel to do it with joining me now to drill down on this week. big stories that are ignored under reported, and mr reported, let's face it by corporate media. garley nixon and dr. wilmore leon, guys, thanks so much by the way. they have their own sputnik radio show called the critical hour. and this is certainly a critical our guys, thanks for being there. let's talk about 1st of all. joining us on she is free. the founder of we can leaks is now back home in his home country of australia, a deal with us, the us here and the justice department here requires that he pleads guilty to a single charge of conspiracy. and in return, he'll receive credit for time served. avoiding any further jail time, i'm going to ask you guys the obvious question, because the thing is here today, the julie massage walks free. but before i ask you that question to me, it seems ridiculous that in order for julian a songs to walk free, he has to admit to a crime. he didn't actually commit any claims. he did not commit, but this was the way the justice system in the united states works right in order

for us to finally stop persecuting you. you have to admit you did something wrong that this wasn't good. this wasn't the justice system. this was the political system and the justice system was used for political ends. it's not only that he did not commit the crime, the evidence show that he did not commit the crime of conspiracy. he did. he did not conspire with anybody to take any thing. he did what media outlets do. he published the information that he was provided, but in order for the, by the administration to save face in this mess, that they exacerbated following the hill on the hills of trump. then this is the the abuse of the system that they had to use in order to walk away with. they now can consider and spin to be a when yeah, well and garland if it was always

a stretch, right, is what we're saying was always a stretch to say, well, he didn't actually hack any materials. you can actually take the materials. but but chelsea manning at the time, bradley many, we'd never been able to figure out how to download the stuff had joined us on personally not walked him through it at the time. but, but they had no evidence of this whatsoever. and that this has been part of the problem in this case against the song, is that not that he actually has classified materials, still classified materials, but that he knew how to do it somehow and remotely talked bradley many through this process that it was absolutely, and not only did they not have the evidence that he did that, the witnesses that they used cars with the, with the main, the witness, a guy named durgy or something, whatever it was of the guy was, you know, a prophetic witness. he admitted that he lied, he was a convicted pet of, i mean, it was an absolute disaster, but i think a big part of it was they didn't want him to come to court because a, they spied on the uh, defense team, which means, i mean,

it would be difficult to get that pass to supreme court. you could not make an argument that he would have that he got a fair trial. i don't think they wanted to get him there because they didn't want to get in front of the supreme court lose number one and number 2 clearly because of the election. so they got, they got a conviction of some type and they moved on because i think they knew they have enough trouble. right now, politically and joe biden was looking for this was about the election in my opinion about the 2024 election. yeah. trying to get the left flight such as it is of the democratic party to kind of get off of his back a little bit. yeah, i agree with you. i think it's very politically motivated, but look again, this is what's happened with assault and what's happened with trump and a lot of his trials. what happens with the most whistle blowers in their trials, right. is that you get these, these crimes that are process crimes, right? so they never found him guilty or even got him to plead guilty to come in in the crime. it's a conspiracy charge, which means it's a thought crime. but let me say this a court had ruled that his actions had not endangered anyone. right?

and so again, it's a fault crime. no one was in danger. because of this, however, the state department spokesperson matthew miller, he seemed to miss that memo. he insisted to reporters this week that a song didn't do wrong without really explaining what the wrong was. listen to this, but are you satisfied that the case is over? so look at the justice department spoken, then i don't have anything to add. obviously the, obviously the, the master put down a statement that said, we're happy to work with our streaming colleagues on it. and that remains the case . i do think it is important when we talk about julia sons' to remind the world that the actions for which he was indicted and for which he has now plead guilty or actions to put the lives of our partners, our allies, and our diplomats at risk, especially those who work in dangerous places like afghanistan and iraq, i actually did talk to the state farm bank. and i don't remember there being any public that there was a public concern that was raised about the potential security risk. those 2 sources

who might have been quoted was there actually any, did you ever discover anyone who was injured? killed had to go into hiding. so because of them, so a few things about that one. i can give you a definitive answer only because i wasn't here at the time. you know, if you drive drunk down the street and get pulled over for drunk driving, the fact that you didn't crash into another car and kill someone doesn't get you out of the uh, of your direct was actions and endangerment that you put your fellow citizens and it's the same thing. same principle applies here, right. well i, i, i don't think that it does, but the fact of the matter is that the state department has been leased, as far as i know and maybe i'm wrong. but there's been as never been able to point to anyone who was compromised or to. ready or, i mean the guys, there's so much wrong with everything that was just said there in that news conference. let's start with the fact that 1st of all, what kind of analogy is the,

if you're driving down the street drunk and you don't crash anyone? and that has nothing to do with what we're talking about. secondly, the fact that you make a very definitive statement as the state department spokesman saying, there were lives at risk. they were partners and people whose lives were endangered . and then you say, give me an example and he says, oh, i can give you an example because i wasn't here. so then the, what do you even talking about please react, go ahead for. he doesn't pay, he doesn't know what he's talking about. yeah. and what this really demonstrates is the power and how far they will go to control the narrative. this is about the story. this is about the narrative. this is not about reality. and this is the same story that's being told by the new york times. it's the same story as being told by the washington post joy of the saw just free. and julian massage uh, pled guilty, and julia massage, put the lives of people at risk. you didn't put lives at risk. what he did

was embarrass american diplomats. he, he tarnished the images of hillary clinton and then her built a and m and, and their sensibilities. this has nothing to do with putting anybody in danger or in peril that did not happen. why girl in disease, he embarrassed the bush administration. he embarrass permanent, washington. he embarrassed the obama administration as well. more rightly says he embarrassing the, the clinton's, the truth is though, is that i think you make the argument. julia massage, didn't in danger. people's live, see, save people's lives by exposing a war in iraq and afghanistan were civilians were dying and an incredibly high rate . it wasn't until a sanction. wikileaks were brave enough to reveal this information that the public said, wait a minute. all these people who are being killed over there aren't enemy combatants . they aren't so called insurgents, whatever that means. and they started to realize there are civilians in massive

numbers who are being killed in these wars. i would argue that a fun save people's lives by revealing this stuff, not putting people in danger. what say you as well. and what we saw with the state department spokesman was the groups think of the narrative, they all get together and they say certain things and not say he was caught flat footed when he made this statement that he put people's lives at risk with in his group no one would say, well, give me an example. there is no, it pissed them a logical context within that group. it's simply, let's make a statement. he put people's lives at risk. he's not. obviously, he was not accustomed to someone saying give me example of that. it was just that what was in our group, this is what we all say. this is the story. and no one's going to challenge that story or focus that story in his group. and they, and you see the state department spokesman get caught every single time someone is given the opportunity to ask a question that digs below a superficial narrative that they have. they always get caught flat footed. well,

that's so well said because engine, you're absolutely right because the reality is he's not used to anyone's saying hoop with what he's talking about. and so instead he says, well, i don't know, i wasn't here. well, the why are you even talking? why are you up on this mind as podium right now? talking is as if you have some kind of knowledge your expertise in this area. and i think this is again, this is a problem in permanent washington, is that there is this prevailing narrative that surrounds everything. and it's in this ridiculous kind of groups speak in which they do say things like working leaks, endangered the lives of our partners. we can't mix in danger anyone's lives. how about how about the military pilots who are shooting journalists and in the interact and killing reuters journalist. and that's where they'll bi weekly leaks where's? where's the condemnation of that and the lives of journalists that was put on the line? the danger comes to the 1st amendment, the in terms of the attack on the freedom of speech. the danger comes as americans

are not being told the truth by their government. about how their tax dollars are being spent, how atrocities are being committed in the, in the names of american people. and unfortunately, there are too many people in that press corps that are so desperate for excess that they won't do with that state department reported that they will question the narrative. they will not put those individual standing at the podium or at the dies on point. and ask them, you just said something. now can you provide data to support it? they won't do that because they want to be sure that they get to ask questions. they don't want to get the reputation of going against the grain and not following the narrative. well, i hear you guys are both right about that. you're both very brave journalists in your own right. but the reality is, is that when you have this is merging of, you know, permanent washington, the bureaucratic state, the state and these agencies that run everything with the media, which we've seen now for at least 20 years. we're no one questions,

anything anymore that's. that's precisely the problem. but guys, let me hold you over because don't go anywhere. when we come back, we're going to delve into the controversy surrounding us missiles. immeasurably used to kill civilians in ukraine. plus, we're going to unpack the dramatic failed to attempt that rock south america this week, our panel returns after the break to discuss these pivotal events, say to the take a fresh look around his life. kaleidoscopic isn't just a shifted reality distortion by power to division with no real opinions. fixtures designed to simplify will confuse really one say better wills. and is it just because it shows review fractured images, presented as fast. can you see through their illusion going underground? can

the the

the and welcome back to direct impact on bins one in for rick sanchez. and this is the week and review switching gears now to southern rush over ukraine launch strikes on sunday targeting. and the city of stuff is still full. at least 4 people were killed, including 2 children over a 150 people were left injured in many of them. as you'll see in this video, we're simply enjoying the end of their weekend because i was relaxing at a result when i had an explosion that

a 2nd explosion understood something, flew into the building from the sky. i went out onto the balcony to see what was going on. everything was covered in smoke. people was screaming, i saw something full into the building. it was about the size of a bed. people were shouting your fire, your fire from all the neighboring buildings from the residential complex people around with everything they could to put out the flames go. it is an incredible story. but maybe the most interesting part of the story though, is that russian defense officials say the strikes were carried out using american attack. and that's missiles, which can only be operated. we're told by us experts, reportedly all flight coordinates need to be input by american specialist. using american intelligence, so let's bring back my crew of guests now doctor wilmore leon. and garland nixon hosts of the critical, our on radio spot next. all right, let's start with you girl in here. um, i mean, obviously this is a major story if, if what is being reported is true, that these were american missiles fired by americans. that's already

a big part of the story, but maybe even bigger is remember this, this strike to placing crimea. we've been told for years now that crimea was a legally amex, and it actually belongs to ukraine and it's full of ukrainians. and yet these missiles were fired, undoubtedly by ukraine, which means that ukraine was firing on their own people. just a couple of things here. number one, and that is that we all know that these are, these were americans, the tech them of the as r, f k, junior stated recently, that's an active work to fire it for the us that this was not new brain that ukraine does not have the technical capability to fire these missiles, this was the united states government firing weapons at civilians in russia. it's an active war, which is in fact, a constitutional violation because the president of the united states does not have the authority to commit an act of war without running it through congress. number one, number 2, i'll say this, the idea that your brain wants to re and ex millions of crime meetings and millions

of easter, a people in don best who speak russian and their, their, their, their, their, their language is outlawed and their religion is outlaw number one and number 2, if they came back in his so called democracy, they'd be allowed to vote, which means that they'd vote as a block and put in a but a pro russian government in, in ukraine. so even the idea that they want to re exit that they want to bring these people back into the ukranian. um, you know, a nation is in, in, in, in of itself preposterous. it absolutely is a little more i think, to, to garlands point about this being an active war. the reality is, it's not just unconstitutional for any of you as president to, to engage in war without a declaration of warrant congress. but that hasn't happened since world war 2, so that's not going to happen. but i think it's even more striking here though, is that they're not even admitting that they're doing it. so it's not just that

it's illegal, it's that it's illegal and it's being done in secrecy as well. this goes back to the point that i made in the previous segment. and that is the united states and citizens of the united states. not being told the truth about the actions that are be being taken by the american government with american taxpayer dollars and, and they aren't being told what, what is being done in their names as to the issue of ukrainians firing on ukrainians to the earlier point. the garland made, these are considered to be ethnic russians. they, they speak russian, there they follow the rough russian orthodox church. in fact, this was done on a sunday on a holiday when the beach was crowded full of, uh, uh, crime in slash that big russian in individuals. and this was not some benign event by the united states to your point attack homes are only used by

american soldiers. this was as robert f kennedy junior. so aptly said, this is in fact a war, correct? absolutely. all right, let's, let's move on here cuz we got a lot in the cover. wanna show you guys video that we've collected here, arm demand rate, bolivian government policies in an attempt at seizing power and it fails, checked us out the

. all right, so this is where things get interesting. juan jose is any guy, the legs, leader of this crew is now under arrest, and claiming this was all a plot to boost the popularity of the president louise are say, the do you guys believe that or could there be other reasons behind all of this darling go 1st. well, what as soon as i found out that the believe the government had signed a deal with russia to my lithium, i knew it's just a matter of time before the resume changed crazy to over at fault the bottom made their move. but this just to me shows that let's just say they've lost their fast ball. if you look at the information debacle, called the bay of pigs with where they sent a bunch of guys in wandering through the jungles who literally lost a gun fight to fishermen. right. and you realize that they just don't have it anymore. and now what do they do? but if you look into this, they like occupied the square in front of the presidential palace. that's how far they got. so i mean, in the area was the original team is

a change attempt. yes. in, in, in, in, in, in practical application. if this is the best they got, i don't think they could over throw, you know, a, uh, a fast food restaurant at this point. and i'm glad of that. well, it seems like that is the problem. it does seem to be getting worse. i would say if you track, especially in latin and south america, the, the competency of cruise going to be in his way line this whole thing that was tried with one guy. no, it just, none of it makes any sense. what we're, you know, it doesn't and cruise i think, have been going on in, in bolivia, for 1946. 1945, something along those lines. we know that the ball morales is waiting in the wings waiting to run for re election. and if this, if this was a cool attempt, please, no one try to present a call on my behalf with clean slaughters like this, who needs enemies? absolutely. all right, let's see here. the coup waters. let's say god finish up here with the us secretary

of state anthony, blinking announcing a new state department partnership. you can make the stuff up with youtube music according to our press release. it is all part of an effort to further the united states elevated commitment to use music to promote peace and democracy, promoting peace and democracy through music anthony blinking. i mean, this is again, it's called the called the secret stuff will work. come on, and then the blinking i, when we know that he's like an amateur guitar as has something like awful rock band from the sixty's. but this guy working with youtube, i guessing the thing that makes it not funny to me is the fact that youtube is such a sensor around the world in terms of what they're able to do when you ever use a partnership with the state department. it's not a good thing. you know, it's not in been, i don't know why you're trying to insult amateur guitar is by calling a bug, i think. yeah. blinking an amateur guitars. he's an amateur. yes. no question. but

hamish, you're good. but the, the already here is that the, but in ministration is on the march against social media big. but if they really want to promote peace, they would allow a free or dissemination of information within the sphere of social media platforms . but no, that's not what they want to do. they want to clamp down on media platforms. so it is very ironic that they are turning to youtube music to promote peace. and i wonder what artists are going to use to do so well, not only what artist they use, but all the money taxpayer dollars, then you're going to get pumped into youtube music. now, in order to help get, again, push it up. but you know, we do something for you and you've got to do something for us. so i don't think since the 19 sixties and seventies have we actually had music that was a part of a resistance to anything that government has done. that's been pretty much wiped out, but this almost guarantees that that doesn't come back, does it not girl. yeah, yeah, and this isn't there is because, you know, as

a person who does the youtube show, i can tell you the one thing that you're going to get censored for on youtube is trying to promote peace of democracy. so the idea that based on house, on a 180 horse and a lot of the lead up there back with the 360 is kind of hard to believe. but the other thing about is this. so now the only blinking wants us to believe that he's trying to from the piece in democracy. how's that going? totally, blanking. i mean, let's look at his record pallets. tony blinker efforts to promote a piece of democracy in the world since he's come to office working. i have a funny feeling that if you evaluate the results of his work, you'll uh you won't, but you'll come to a conclusion that either he's not good at it. or he's like, well, or, or go to general eventually be pacing ukraine while they're willing to the piece and because it won't there. but when you get to read the, find the words piece and democracy when you create your are all meaningful those words. and i, i suppose it can be this and we're living in the time we're up is down and down is up freedom in slavery. and slavery is freedom,

democracy and peace are actually tyrannical. regimes like what zalinski is running in ukraine right now. but blink is all about that stuff guys. great, having you on with us today. thanks so much for your insight. see you back there next week. and that is our show for you. i've been, swan will see you next time with more stories that make a direct impact. the, the russian states never is as tight as i'm one of the most sense community best most. i'll send some of the same assistance

to father speed. the one else calls question about this, even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin media mission, the state on the rush of funding and supports the r t. suppose next, even our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube tv services. for what question did you say a request for check the, the 1st 3rd of the 19th century, it was marked by the aggressive expansion of the united states. the american sought to seize as much territory for a settlement as possible,

ignoring the sovereignty of the neighboring states and the interests of the indigenous peoples. in 18. 45, washington announce the annexation of mexican texas. and in march, 1846. american troops invaded mexico. however, mexico itself did not have enough means to effectively confront the enemy. besides, it was being torn apart by internal conflicts. the americans manage to turn the tide of the war in their favor. in september 18, 47, the u. s. army captured mexico city. mexico was forced to sign a humiliating piece. 3. it is according to wait to get lost, 55 percent of its territory, vieques, asian of the lands to the united states to lead to terrible consequences. bloodshed, genocide was committed against the indians in california. during the 1st half century of the american ruled, the number of the indigenous people in the region decrease from 150216000 people.

slavery, which had been abolished in mexico long before the united states attacked was restored on the occupied territories. this will later become one of the reasons for the civil war in the united states themselves. nations like individuals are punished for their transgressions. we got our punishment. american president ulysses grant wrote about the consequences of aggression against mexico several decades later the the . 2 the do it through the bill.

0 tools or you just give them the sure stuff to go. i still have to meet you the see the started the things i wanted you to just do look the national. so get plenty of suicide. that gives us a move from the blue screen. the,

the, the, the, the sure, so we do on site so it's gone down to your bill is monthly. yeah, it does, but i'm sorry, i'm got somebody, it's almost live live. oh gosh. if i still have to use it when you wasn't in the.