royalty a murder and a $911.00 co defendant. as a part of this top secret security clearance, tim had to promise that he would not reveal to any of these men, that he also happened to be gay. overtime tim built a report with k s. m, and while lead, they taught him about their lives and the group developed the level of mutual respect and trust. one day will lead gave him a warning saying this one day, all of you on this defense team will turn against one another. you americans devote your lives to prestige fame and money. you will turn against each other in the end just to get that for yourselves. in the end, that's actually what happened. the lead attorney and her assistant began plodding against the other defense attorneys in an attempt to make themselves indispensable . they began bullying gas lighting and scape coding the other attorneys on the team . this was all of course, at the expense of the clients who would be on trial for their lives. when tim

vocalized, his concerns about this misconduct, the attorneys turned on him and they told the all kind of leaders that he was gay saying ridiculously, that he was lusting after them. the pentagon quickly fired him from the defense team, but then something unexpected happened. what lead been a tash, supposedly one of the most dangerous and murderous men in the world? left to tim's defense, he wrote a letter to the judge, exposing the other lawyers lies. the other defense attorneys protested and brought additional problems to the case that we'll discuss in a minute. but what is this new found and so called lavender scare that lives at depending on and how is it that i'll kind of comes to the defense of a day american man. when the american government tries to destroy him, i'd like to welcome doctor tim john sommerling attorney, mentally, scholar and author. tim, thanks for being with us. thank you, john. it's

a great opportunity to see you and to be on yourself. i'd like to start with your background and qualifications to take on a position like one kind of a defense attorney. you're not just an attorney, but you're also a middle east experts. so tell us about your life, your education, and your progression to this important position. well, it actually all starts with me being a flight attendant for american airlines for 25 years. i was flying the flights between chicago and paris in dallas and paris. and i spend a lot of time going back and forth to egypt because i had fallen in love with it, particularly falling in love with the, with the silence and the smells of egypt and the people. and particularly the lessons call. i was really, really fascinated by that, so i started, um they decided go go to get a ph. d and in arabic and eric studies, and i wrote a couple of books and the palestinian israeli conflict and put in political art in

the conflict. and a book about a serial typing of arabs and muslims in, in the american popular film. and then by 11 happens, and the beginnings of the war on terror happens, and then i heard the news stories about i would raven, the discussions about torture with airbags and muslims. and um i saw home like crew members and how passengers were treating arabs and muslims passengers and, and i, i wanted to go to law school to help stop this hatred and this discrimination. and so in law school for the next 3 years i, i focused on human rights studies and on death penalty. and then 6 months after i got out of law school, i found myself on the um, the fort hood case um, as the mitigation expert, i was hired by the i by the army. and then over the next 14 years i um i serve as mitigation expert for over 40 cases for men, women and children who uh,

we were in jail and facing the death penalty or facing life imprisonment. how did you get involved, specifically in the defense of one condo defendants? was this something that you sought out, or was it something that found you so to speak? it's a little of both john, i, you know, in law school i, you know, that which is a 2006 to 2009. i was studying cases like how i'm done versus rumsfeld. and i was study, you know, booming teen versus bush and i, i also was doing lectures on rendition we, we didn't know much about rendition at the time. and so i remember going to london in the school of oriental napkin studies and, and giving a lecture and how we could build stories about rendition. and i want to ask them you and at the same that same lecture. and then i found myself working for ken or the counselor evans is like relations trying to um and we were studying people who

were arrested for um, airbags and looking for a respite during this time period for up supposed to terrorism. and it was my last school objective to get this case, but i certainly didn't know how to go about doing it. and then when i was on the fort hood case, my name started getting around for the fact that i was, is knowledgeable person about them. you know, the middle east and i had experience with air, you know, i was speaking arabic and i had experience with, with death penalty cases. and i was making this progress was not hostile. but when the board court was opening up in 2011, there was mad rush to get experts like mitigation experts like myself. and i got a call from this out of the blue. i got a call from the lead lawyer at the pen attached team. and it took over a year for me to get my um, security clearances and have the military commissions appointment with mr. bennett cash is mitigation expert. so it was just

a little of both as nice as you great. that can. what was it like at 1st being in the room with some of the most dangerous men in the world? how long did it take you to build a relationship of trust and how did that relationship develop? you know what i got to say. so what kind of the dive in right away? i was eager to do that and i wanted to get to work. you know, i had done all my academic research on the middle east, you know, and in grad school and i was, you know, i was really into topics of colonialism resistance. and i had previous clients and i developed an art way of working with them. these men and these women with, you know, what done some awful or, or being charged for doing some very awful things. but these people were americans and despite our subcultures of race and you know, economics and stuff were all still americans. but during that year of waiting while i'm waiting there to do this case, you know i,

i have to start working and i start studying, you know, things about, you know, as long as the revival and i start studying, you know, the literature is lot of through bible and islamic jihad during the russian invasion back in assess, i'm looking at so i clicked to, i'm looking at a go, i'd some and all their writings. and so it's educating myself as well as best as i could on 911 with the literature. that was available, so i had to listen to the distortions that i was getting from thomas friedman and from samuel huntington and from richard clark and the bush administration. oh, once, once i got into that room into that court room, i knew that i was as close to the center of knowledge about $911.00 and about what half of what happened in a box and islamic jihad that i was ever going to get. but it still was going to be an unprecedented challenge with me for me because here i was now working with

enemies of the united states. i was not working with americans like i had been working with before. um, so it took me about a year to gain mr. ben attached his trust. i saw him with someone who needed help. i see, and i both saw, i told her as enemies and i had to work really hard to show him that i was really there to help protect his life. i don't think it was. i think it was about a year later that it was only when mister uh, when can someone mr. mohammed actually gave me his um, approval that mr. bennett cost and accepted me on powerful. you've written a book about this whole experience called my enemy, my defender, which is being published by sky horse publishing in new york. in the book, you talk about the backbiting and difficult relationships that the guantanamo defense attorneys have with each other. tell us about that dynamic and about why those relationships are so difficult. so john, i was on a field was

a lead lawyer whose group on the case was tenuous at best because of their different co relationship between helping me lawyer and mr. brand task and that led to a lot of paranoia and panic, crudely lawyer, and the lead lawyer had this minion attorney who was a us, they up united states air force captain. and they had convinced themselves that the best way for them to remain on the team was to make themselves indispensable to the government and to mister bennett task. and so they thought that they could remain as the most knowledgeable the most trusted, the most continuous members on the team for the length of time they could be there forever in therefore they had to have this continual purging of talent that was underneath that men of anyone who gain more knowledge of the case or that no, i have more trust or mr. ben, a task,

or anyone who might threaten the lead lawyers knowledge or outbreak, the dominion captain. and um, so there was always somebody on the chopping block and they would get helpers to help them get rid of people. and once a target was selected and then bullied, and then purge, they move on to the next verse. and so i'm getting rid of people concluded gas lighting, bullying, setting people up for failures and you know, buying on team members, family members, and then reporting that to each other. and then um and picking up reporting it to mr. bennett tosh. them, in some cases they did and in my case it was this forced outing that they did to me about my sexuality in the trying to plan the featured home a full. but the real question is like, why would they do something like that other than panic and other than then, you know, paranoia, but there was the motivations. cuz panama was

a bonanza. you know, as long as you can stay on that bucking bronco, you can, it was a pen handy. i mean, the salaries for lawyers, lawyers are up to $500000.00 per year. i don't get travel around the world and these top hotels and these world capital or a fee, food towers and bottles of wine and thousands of travel miles that you get along with it. and then there's this idea that this is a historical case, and you'll get appearances on 60 minutes and you get your full patients for yourself on the new york of your opinions on new york times. and they're spiegel and the mon, and documentaries, and, and as we see in the more canyon there's, there's movie potential as well. and, you know, it sounds fun to you meet these, these movers and shakers in the world of human rights. and um politicians and, and, and it's funny that we laugh at it now, but you know, it was

a chance to give you the to people who are around charlie rose is table telling all the knowledge, but only you new. thank you, tim. we're going to take a short break and when we come back, we're going to ask him similarly about how things change for him, make one tunnel and about why the enormous pedagogy bureaucracy also turned against him. stay to the everything had changed with her daughter. she was completely when they came back and they told jamie, your daughter is having a diabetic ketoacidosis, i was miserable. i just felt sick and nauseous and hardest cancer diabetic prefer on her on the face that affects every part inventory and assist

in the american diabetes association. is that the american diabetes association has been bought off by the millions of dollars that the pharmacy corporations use them every year. i wasn't given a specific diet i just told to inject and tap so i wish i could go back and change the governing bodies, put those recommendations out, forces physicians to live within those guidelines for fear of reprisals. people have not been told the full truth on how to manage the diabetes and what, what the consequences are funny carbohydrate diet. there was a multiple 1000000000 dollar asians that we go bankrupt the

welcome back to the suppliers. i'm john kerry onto we're speaking with tim john simulink. he's an attorney middle east expert, former guantanamo defense attorney and the author of the new book, my enemy, my defender. thanks again for being with us. tim. thank you john. tim, there are several issues that i'd like to raise with you. first. i want to talk about the hostility of these guantanamo defense attorneys that you've written and spoken about. you're right, that the hostility and jealousy are systemic. it's not just the attorneys, you say in the book that, that this still the, extends to the judges and indeed it's throughout the entire system. can you tell us about that? you know, the defense organization was, was led by a general and he had this monitor and his monitor was, i choose the people who's on the defense team, lead lawyers, they run their defense teams. i give them the tools and the shoes, they get what they get and then they get the who they get. and so she had

basically built this like cement feeling, where were all of us below. if we had real problems, we couldn't go to him and say there's real problems here. and i had always spoken with him twice, but the lead lawyer and the captain. it's somehow convinced this guy that i wasn't a team player. it was my turn on the chopping block that i was not some team player, and that was actually dangerous to the team. when the captain and i had a disagreement about whether i could talk to mr. bennett tash or i could not talk to him at this particular point. um mr. ben attached wanted me to go to, to the, to the general and say, you know, tell them the truth of what's going on. i contacted the general for a meeting and he contacted me back with a number of emails that said, you know, let's set this up, here's the time and here's the place. but when i got to the meeting all with, with, with my preparations all in the hands of the general wasn't there. and i realized

that i had been brought into an ambush situation and in the workplace, mobbing that the general himself, it set up a legal hour and the captain had set up that with him the night before. right? so at that meeting, what they do is they fire me and the lead lawyer says, the general asked us to do this. um, so they just forwarded me off the island and handed me a letter, and then the letter is dated. the day before the meeting was supposed to play place and it says that i was fired. so this is all pre planned by him. and it's traumatic is that was i 5000 that story because it matches up with the way that things are done at the dio, dns to kind of guy and, and that the military commissions. because 2 years after i was released, harvey richard cough was doing the reading a story, the man who the general reports to. and then richard top,

lieutenant colonel gary brown, who was 2nd in charge. they were negotiating a play deal with that with the defense teams to, to, to try to get these stall trials moving. and so they were trying to get a pre deal to take the death penalty off the table. and brown, later complained on n p, r. he said that he embraced the call were ambushed. they were called in to um, under false pretences. they were called into a meeting at the pentagon and then handed letters with no explanations that they were fired that our credentials receives and they were escorted out of the building . so an m p r brown was complaining how they were treated. but when it happened to people like me or other people, i got big these 2 who are in charge secure less. but when it happened to them, they were calling it a dirty trick. so another example is when i made my complaints to my attorney military board, i am

a current registration board about how it was forced out by the captain and by the by the lead lawyer. and the general jumped in and sent a letter to my attorney registration board and says that i was the one who caused serious damage to defend cease. and he includes 2 letters. i'm a government stationary by to new lawyers would come onto the team. one of the letters said that i was like a logically unstable, and the other one said that i should be barred from ever being on a death penalty case. again, because i have some, some guy that influence over terrorist, those are the ones that are there. now, as for the judge, there's another story about the judge in the transcript that shows that distributed past. wanted to get rid of the lead lawyer and the captain after i left any one of the representatives. so because he couldn't trust them anymore. and then the transfer be says, i can't work with somebody, he would cheats me and causes me psychological harm. and so he wrote these letters,

the judge paul, stating that the, the judge stating that the, the lawyers, these lawyers are putting lies about me and promotions. and he wanted to just know that he was making decisions based upon lice. but the judge wouldn't accept been a task his letters because it had be written by a lawyer and in the motion for him and been a tasha saying these lawyers aren't going to write a letter to. it's going to mean that they're going to get fired. i'm going to do nothing right and motion to that means it's going to get fun. they're going to get fired. so the judge s one of the new lawyers on the team, if they will, how well mr. going to pass a he refuses to do it. and the judge has to the court and say to everybody before a basic law principle. and he says to everyone that the ultimate loyalty of the court of the attorney is to the client, not to the other attorneys. and so he appointed independent counselor to help mister bin akash lights. most of the general den steps in and says,

there's no need for any special council. this is where he makes that i give them the tools speech and the judge canceled the independent counsel and the planes, mr. bennett trash for all the problems that he's having with his lawyers. and now the letters that we're showing, the truth were never made it to motions. a very interesting point that you make is that what this behavior, what the systemic attitude amounts to is a continuation of something known as the lavender scare. and there are several parts to this point. you say, depending on scape codes, l g, b, t, q, americans to preserve its own power, that it weaponized is sexuality. that it makes it assumption that l g b t q employees are somehow a higher security risk risk, which of course, they are not. and that the policy forces people to out themselves give us some more detail. here is the situation really that malignant. well,

let me start by saying that despite what mr. buying this thing the last year about the lavender square being a past. and despite what senator baldwin and senator cain are now doing, trying to get a resolution for an apology for the lavender here, they're only taking it up to 2011 to and their only thing is for government employees and for military personnel. mice story, 2015 as a contractor that works with the government. my story show that the lavender scare tactics are not extinguished. they are not extinguished with the passing of time. so i want to make sure that i'd say these to, to the, to the, to the, to the, to the politicians that, that the, the, let's not pick wash this very, very serious problem that you have there. and the government. so looked up when they fired me leave the lawyer demanded that i give them my resignation. otherwise they were going to fire me. and when i refused to give a resignation,

they had back themselves into a corner to fire me. and then she's threatening me and she said exactly that. she said, i will frame the type of mitigation expert you are. i will tell you what i believe which could negatively affect your future as a mitigation expert. don't you dare do anything about this. all of this has been documented and reviewed by experts. that's what i was told when they went through mr. bad tosh, they had to explain to him why they fired me. and that's when they let the secret out of me being gay. and when he didn't react the way they wanted him to react, they had up auntie. and they told him that i had lustful interest in him. and that they had to protect him for me. they went to the rest of the team and then they glowed at about it about what they said and i still for the life. and we can

understand how when the world can my, my sexuality could have anything to do with saving this man's life. but mind you, while they told everyone else they didn't want me to know about what they had done and it wasn't until 6 months later that a i have a dentist sergeant on the team who is having a very big moral dilemma with what was going on and was very traumatized. that was what's going on. asked to come see, came out here from what came out to chicago from washington and actually told him what they did. and i have the choice to make. if i fight this, i'm going to up myself further forward, do i let them do it and get away with it? and um, what i think about as all the security analysts, all of the officers of both discharge and all the lawyers who are on the team that, that are all held to a higher standard. none of them had the courage or the forwarded to the step up, and the report is only about small lowest level,

the lowest ranking person on the team could. and once i found out and i started asking more questions of other people then that people started feeling a little more courage and they stepped up and they started providing the problem, writing evidence about what was going on. and so when, like i said, when i started filing things, i had to help myself further. and there were internal investigations that these people have to run now because they were getting complaints me and them they were being run by the mob or some. so the general and the lead lawyer and they weren't interested in finding out whether it was the truth of the matter. what they were interested in finding out was for the moles on there and who were telling me the truth. so when i filed my complaint with a balance of, i wanted to say there's just, there weren't just 2 people involved. this went through the whole v o t that went through, i was assured that i went to the office of inspector general of the d. o. d,

i went to the under secretary of defense for readiness and personnel, and it went to the, does it deal with these ethic boards? but my case was closed within a month and i heard nothing back from any of these people. but i did, you know that the lead lawyer and the captain were aided and abetted and that they were condoned and they were rewarded and they were protected and defended. and when i went to the court to seek justice, the deal in j to joint in and help them keep this. i secret and hide the truth. so even today, 9 years later, 9 years later, despite all the evidence that we have, they still want to sign with me. they are now sending you letters of, of, of the many that i don't not tell my story that i don't tell the truth. and they have threatened me with my attorney license and the livelihood and, and they want to silence the victim to protect the perpetrators. well,

i've read the book and i can tell you that it is absolutely true. terrific interview. thank you for your insights. tim carl heinrich will ricks is known as the very 1st game man to publicly announce his sexual identity. born in germany in $1825.00 is coming out, was a historic watershed event. he said, quote, i am proud that i have found the courage to deal the initial blow to the hydra of public contempt and quote, those are powerful words. and yet here we are 200 years later. and the hydra of discrimination, hatred, and contempt still has not been slain. indeed, it's alive and well. and it's living in the pentagon. i'd like to think our guest tim john sommerling for being with us today, and thank you to our viewers for joining us for another episode of the whistle blowers. i'm john kerry. aku, please follow me on subject at john curiosity. and we'll see you next time.

the the out probably her, my little sister store. okay. the model girl that i got you. no problem seem to them out of the arguments. yeah. side of the drive i showed my brother through he was sudden to help people for a lo so now i never looked at searches as being saved. well i guess i lost my list. that's the outcome of chicago police. it'd be gang of chicago is like to give you a photo that police. you lose your life as another crime. say another

this could have been a doctor. a nurse could have been the next president. ok, keep losing people out here. the position i would suggest fell great. i was suggesting that we send americans and the bridges on the drink that on your bill is us. one of them of move dining probably now now about seeing with a strong wanted see it all the on use will tell you that it will series from us of classes in the middle city. so what i need to file a possibility of this was always does this one is not at the the source or sit emotional around noon. it may be, you know,

a lot less radioactive than the something is active uranium, but still it's radioactive. it has toxins that killed the laptop. you want me to go and see what he's of us here. again, let's see the echo seats. not going good. i don't. the knowledge was suggesting we farm sell grace bill, call us. what day was the dam meaningful object to when it comes to that even more when defend donasia, that they just to counter russian. and i think the subdivisions going to that are very, very aware of the fact. and they try to use that uh, notion for data on the

oh, the 70 killed in a 100 june left. when did that, these do? i didn't miss on writing down on a so called safe zone, but displays ponds. dns is something in the phasing slabs. washington's results that are not biden signed into law saying it's really see the child's internal affairs may be a trend for retaliation measures you message to the new world. president elect massuce because it's can ascend teams committed to expanding ties with most go and the baby yang while taking pain at washington.