Skip to main content

tv   Direct Impact  RT  August 23, 2024 3:30pm-4:01pm EDT

3:30 pm
the the hey rick sanchez here. this is direct impact and this is what we're going to be talking about. they have unfortunately turned us into us boiler and we don't want to be as boiler. we want it too and we wanted a fair shot. our k juniors running made explains how the democrats pushed him away and apparently into mister trump's loving arms. you're going to hear it for yourself. we're going to let you see that. i'm rick sanchez. let's do this. the right r f k junior. obviously, his uncle was the president, his father would have been president, had not been shot, a prominent member of one of the most famous democratic families in us history. he's going to quit the race and possibly endorse donald trump and be here is
3:31 pm
running. may tell if it's happening because he's been treated so poorly. she says by the democratic party, this d n c aligned pack that was created specifically to take us out has spent millions of dollars to take us out. they have unfortunately turned us into us boiler um and we don't want to vs boiler. we want it to and we wanted a fair shot at the dnc, made that impossible for us. they have a band shadow band as kept us off stages. manipulated polls use lothair against us, sued us in every possible state. we've even planted insiders into our campaign to disrupt and to create actual legal issues for us to. so let's talk about this obvious question. will he actually endorse trump? and what's he going to get for doing? so these things always have a price, right?
3:32 pm
there is talk of a cabinet position, but it's not firmed up yet. why is the out? why is the out money? time and a dropping poll numbers, possibly. who's? who's you're going to really help in this? right? the obvious answer would seem to be donald trump, because he's going to endorse donald trump. but it ain't automatic. you know what i mean? it depends on how he sells it, and how mr. trump sells that maybe perhaps during their announcement, remember, his followers tend to dislike both parties. right? so convincing them to make that job is going to be kind of hard. and it may even help harris, because aligning with trump could anger some of his followers who don't want to go along with anybody. this is, this is uh, this is quite a pickle here. you know, manila, this whole thing is probably going to work itself out. it's, it's going to be fun to watch it. now. what are your thoughts? oh, absolutely. it's going to be fun to watch. but to nicole shanahan's point,
3:33 pm
she's absolutely right. the, the democratic side of this, you know, political show that we have here in the united states has been proven over. and over that while that particular party stands, they say for pro choice, when it comes to women's rights, they're not so pro choice when it comes to the ballot box. and we've seen how they've treated our f k junior, which is why he jumped ship. they were not going to allow that, that we, if we can call it that of the democrats to actually be successful or have a real chance at being on the, the, the dump the dnc ticket in the primaries because we didn't even see a primary for the democrats, so to her point, she's absolutely right. she's pulling the veil back on how it's actually done, but it was that he has gone independent. the numbers have gone down rick steadily
3:34 pm
and decline since he left the party. but a lot of the polls do show that if people were, were poached, we'll call it that because i don't believe people are, you know, should or have to vote one party or the other. but if they are radically, if he were poaching from anybody, he'd be mostly poaching from trump voters because the people that are on the democratic side have already drank the kool aid and they are going to vote blue no matter who. so the p, the party, he would have been hurting, would have been the republicans in this case. it's donald trump. so for him to go and potentially, we don't know, potentially, you know, square of a deal behind closed doors somewhere. then, you know, that's kudos to him and that's, that's great for, for kennedy and the mission that he has and whatever that is. and so i think it feedbacks, trump, i think it will actually help trump because it will bring the people back to the republican party. we disagree. i think he's going to end up having absolutely no
3:35 pm
effect a minimal effect, or maybe even going the other way. and helping harris because so many of those people are going to look at it as i don't, i didn't i, the reason i was going to vote for you is because i didn't want to be. yeah. so don't tell me what to do kind of thing, but what, what will say they will say, hey, they hate harris more than they hate trump. i think those, those particular motors. okay. very starting to be some real bickering in the democratic party about how president joe biden was treated on the 1st night of the election. this is new. the president was supposed to give his final good bye in prime time, around 8 or 9 o'clock. the guy is it's, it's really getting late now. so let's wrap up the other speakers and bring out joe . please welcome, congressman jim driver, raphael warner, kathy hoko, alexandria of gus. you'll see me jasmine crockett, chris and i want to talk with you for just a few minutes. the
3:36 pm
going on no disrespect to chris cruz, but chris, boone's midnight mom has got to get to bed and you know who else has to get to bed for the love of god. let's hear from biden. please welcome ashley bye. it's good. you know, everybody's talking about it since it happened. he didn't even get on stage until like the prime time audience was gone and they had all gone to bed. so most americans didn't even get to see the prison united states. what is you know, farewell speech? well, what was it done on purpose? democratic convention, official say it happened because it was just too many long ovations and the night went long. funny how that didn't happen when mister obama store from when mister clayton spoke afterwards, vag to the matter of the democrat, the party seems to be done with mister button. and while it may make sense from
3:37 pm
a political standpoint to try and win the election to do so, you know, to do it that way. it just seems a little harsh, you know, just a little harsh. and here's nancy pelosi, by the way. she finally got nailed down on this thing. couple of dick tapper and what's her name over and cnn sat her down during the convention and asked her, did she push binding out of the rich? it does seem like there's some residual bad blood or resentment and i'm wondering if you've spoken to him and, and, and what your responses to that. sometimes you just have to take a punch for the 2000 a teen made the decisions for the country. my concern was not about the president was about his campaign. as you, as he has seen, the exuberance, the excitement that has come forth in that country. i just did a event for one of our members in illinois. eric johnson today. immediately he got
3:38 pm
1100 volunteers into his campaign. as soon as that announcement, nobody is questioning the fact that that the democratic party seems much better positioned right now than it did for weeks and 2 days ago. there's no question about that. a former speaker, polosa you why we've been talking about it either. yeah. why we've been talking about this thing. you know, what's interesting is that she didn't go after by them. she went after his campaign . isn't that the same thing? i'm just curious, but why god, rick, it's it, gosh, it's, i mean, again, it just shows you that the, the d n c machine just choose you up and spits you out when you are no longer useful to it. in this case, biden was the poor spat out full that they use for a couple of years to achieve their means was to get, you know, donald trump, out of office. that was the end goal. and he was the means. and i guess, you know, poor old joe and, and whatever forwarding your friendship, he thought he had with nancy pelosi that yeah. door. yeah. as well. i like to
3:39 pm
there's no such thing as loyalty. well m vitaware, he said that's why they say get a dog. yeah. by the way, they're right. i mean, he was hurting the party. they didn't want to have him on and they've done everything possible to remove him and i guess it's within their right to do so. it just seems like it's a little cool. and once again, the point that i always make on the show is just be transparent about it. and to say it's yes, we ask them to step down because he was essentially brawling it for the party. and we had to do it and in her, but we did it instead. it's like all this double talk about, well we didn't really want him to go away. we just wanted his campaign to go away. well, here's our one more. one more thing, manella. did you, did you watch? did you watch last night? were you watching last night? i did as much as i could. i the but i got to tell you. stevie wonder stevie wonder what i watched for i'm a political guy. so i watch your booklet and he's my stevie wonder and,
3:40 pm
and just watch bill. this bill clinton go you think they're kidding. but i know all these folks, most of them are really good people. but some of them think that they are bound to dominate america politically, economically and socially. and they have to use politics to do it. and they said, rick, this is i don't believe in. that's something he looked feeble. his hands, you know we're, we're, we're shaking his voice was cracking. he was raspy. just it was fast for me. yeah, this is human drama. we're talking about here. it was fascinating to see a guy who i personally think is one of the greatest presidential communicators has ever lived. i don't care what they say about reagan and obama. i know there's
3:41 pm
people who are going to put, you know, put their votes in for them. um, to suddenly see him in that light. it kind of shocked me. i didn't expect it. but you know, it is what it is and father time is coming knocking. well rick, we got a point out. he is 78 years old. he's just slightly younger than donald trump and several years younger than president biden is right now. but i think when we, as spectators, forgetting journalists, we as world spectators, when we think of bill clinton, we think of him in his glory days when he was in the oval office. i mean, at the time here when he wasn't a 1st inaugurated, he was 46 years old. i mean, he was the, the 3rd youngest president ever inaugurated. and to this day, right. so i think we all think of him in that prime and that hey, yeah, but, but it was but then, but it has been fraught with health problems. right. but it's more than that. i mean, george bush was young too, and he started like an idiot. every time he talked,
3:42 pm
there was something back. there was something about, there was something about bill clinton. victory made him one of the one of the it factor more than obama, more than just about everybody else. he's, he had that they are back then. and to see and have said, yeah, he was a great our reader. and as time has caught up rick, he's 78 years old. he's got the case of the handshakes. we're usually part and parcel of parkinson's disease. yeah, i didn't want to say, boy, we're getting more. yeah, no, yeah, it looks like nation advice, you know, or are politicians are closer. i guess all you gotta do is turn on the tv. you watch any political show and you see these guys like the great senator from the state of kentucky who every once in a while just seems to go into some cerebral sit around the whole different hard to watch, hard to watch. all right, so fast, it's sad. thank you, kid. oh, i will talk to you again very soon. i and when we come back, china, china,
3:43 pm
we discuss a big story that has gotten little to no attention this week by the main stream media about the united states, altering its nuclear strategy to focus on china and r k j no is a journalist, he's an author, he's a political analyst and the perfect person to discuss the story with, cuz he might know a little bit about it. so stay right there. we're going to come right back. china looks the take a fresh look around his life. kaleidoscopic isn't just a shifted reality distortion by power to division with no real opinions. fixtures designed to simplify will confuse who really wants a better wills. and is it just as a chosen few fractured images presented as 1st?
3:44 pm
can you see through their illusion going underground? can a beautiful sun soaked to the vineyards nestled among some rest, taking the rolling hills as a gentle breeze comes off of the surrounding sea comic imagery of french wine country. but this is not france. we are in a coupon at russia on the black sea, where recently they've got the serious about making some world class one. the scenes the beginning of its history. the united states of america has officially declared this driving for freedom and people's rights to happiness. however, in reality, having one independent american colon is tested for that total extermination of the
3:45 pm
indigenous population of the continent, american indians were deprived of their land. local residents were driven into reservation, given the worst agricultural territories, while the best land was appropriated by white colonizers, the strongest blow to american indian tribes was the extermination of bites of native americans lived by hunting these wild animals. colonists slaughtered the bison, and in fact, made them nearly extinct. every buffalo did, he's in india and gone and said, colonel richard got a veteran of the bloody and vicious indian wars cynically. the indigenous population was simply exterminated us army general phillips sheridan express the evidence of this policy in the infamous words. the only good india is a dead indian. the genocide of native americans of north america lead to a demographic catastrophe. the exact number of deaths is still unknown,
3:46 pm
but the number of victims in millions having been a majority on the continent before the indigenous people make up less than 3 percent of the us population today. the. the. hey, welcome back, i'm rick sanchez. let's continue this. you know, well, most people are thinking as manila and i were just talking about a little while ago. the jo biden's presidency is finished somewhere in like palm beach, california on a beach right now literally were told there's a report of the new york times that seems to be suggesting not so fast. and what is a huge story that is being generally ignored by the us media? because who cares about the possibility of nuclear war? right? the ministration is revising it's nuclear strategy with an emphasis on china. where'd this come from? why?
3:47 pm
because according to the nuclear employment guidance, that's what they're calling it. it sounds like a jobs program. and when you think of it, it probably kind of is dependent on is concerned, but china is nuclear stockpiles will rival the quote size and the diversity of the united states and rushes over the next decade. so that's why they're doing all of this. wow, talk about out of left field. joining us now to talk about this is r k j. now k j is an offer he's a journalist is a teacher is a job, a geopolitical analyst. and he's also the host of the china report on the breakthrough news. congratulations on that k j, and thanks so much for joining us. thank you, rick. pleasure to meet with you. so what do i mean uh, what, what is it that the united states is saying they have just found out about china? that is so important. what's your take? well, i think we have to take all of these things with both a grain of salt and also do some deep analysis around them. if you remember in the
3:48 pm
early 2, thousands there was this thing called the 2 low panic. i don't know if you know, have you ever seen the film milan that much? of course, and do you remember those big, circular houses? yeah. ok. well, the us in the early 2, thousands, they came up with this report saying that china had created scores of new new, clear silos. and this was a dead leaf thread to the united states. it turned out on closer examination. these were these 500 year old chinese circular houses where, you know, clans live inside them, they're made out of money. they're 500 years old. and the us was saying, but these, when you new, clear silos. so there's a little, there's a little bit of a history of threat inflation. and if i may go so far as to give you the actual statistics. in 1984, the d i a, the pentagon estimated the china had 200 a little under 200 nuclear weapons. mm hm. moorhead but they estimate that they
3:49 pm
would be $800.00 in a decade. then they would, none of those projections came true. so in 1999 they said, well they still have 200, but within 20 years they'll have 500. that didn't come true. and then in 2019 they said, well, they still have around 200, but we estimate in 15 years they'll have 1500. so this, this was the history of threat inflation, which is not up held by the fact that the facts or did you find that as of very, very minimal nuclear deterrent. it's the absolute minimum that they believe is necessary kind of almost a symbolic deterrent. they have no launch onboarding. their warheads are detached from the vehicles and they have no further stripe policy. well yeah, yeah. is it, in fact i was just gonna add to that. i was just checking on it rush. i has the most, uh, nuclear warheads they have uh,
3:50 pm
5500 and according to a i overview the united states as 5000 uh, 44. they have 90 percent of the world's nuclear weapons. according to these reports, china is not, not anywhere near any of that. so i would imagine some people are we saying, well, what's up and what our, the chinese, reacting to this a will the chinese are not happy about this, a tall. uh, they say that this is by the us is attempt to, uh, uh, to uh, to create an escalation dominance to create a pretext for escalation dominance. essentially they sent us is using this to shark, its responsibilities to uh, meaningfully negotiate, uh, you know, new, clear reductions. and instead to use this as a pretext for nuclear escalation and nuclear domino's, i think, personally, it's a little bit more ominous than that. i think what this is trying to do,
3:51 pm
and remember this is from the new york times, right. this is the white house correspondent working at the new york times. i think that what they're trying to do, and this is clearly a leak that was fed to him, is they're trying to normalize the idea of nuclear war with china. it's their fault, therefore, you know, think about it. we're going to go to what we don't want to, but you know, looks like we're going to have to have nuclear war with china and we see this right now inquiry. they're rehearsing nuclear work on the korean peninsula. the deputy national security advisor has threatened to new china and new north korea, which essentially the same thing is waging war with china. and the deputy doesn't have the authority to say any of those things unless you was authorized. well, it always seems to come back these conversations, doesn't it? to the fact that having an escalation is fruitful and profitable
3:52 pm
for certain people in the military industrial complex sphere. how much of that do you think is involved in this? oh, and certainly, i mean the industry is very, very much a part of it, right it's, it's such a huge part of the military industrial complex. and also remember as the economic system starts to fail, or traditionally, what is being done, the reboot is war. so this is the thinking about using war to reboot the economy. so that's definitely very much part of it. but i think that what we really have to watch out for is nuclear war is not something you trifle trifle with car new us war doctrine is new, clear 1st stripe. it's what they call a knots nuclear july station target selection, which is a counter force doctrine, where you simply preemptively stripe your enemy 1st. in other words,
3:53 pm
the us doctrine of war against china and other countries is the new, clear sucker punch. why would anybody in our government go along with something like that? what, what, what i can understand the profit motive behind this. but you know, some bureaucrat, i guess i don't know the kind of gone to the state department, wherever it is, the people who are involved in these decisions all the way up to the white house. why would they do something with what's. ringback in their cage and i think it's decades and decades of the crude institutional stupidity. it didn't happen overnight. this has been building up for a while. presidential directive of $59.00, which authorized counter force strikes for his tribes was done in 1980. we're talking about decades that was jimmy carter. and so this is decades of a crude ideological stupidity, not i even an institute, not institutional wisdom,
3:54 pm
institutional stupidity that has led to these kind of ideological blind is that they believe that either they exhort dominance or they threaten to end the world. they would rather see the end of the plan at the end of their power and privilege. i think that's what it boils now, but it's little bit like asking why does the schools you don't want to take up the entire school? there's a mental illness there, but for these people the ruling neil con elite class for them the entire world is the school. wow. um, let me ask you about china. what are they escalating their new, clear proliferation and if not, will this make them more apt to do so you fear, you know, i think that's the $64000.00 question. nobody has a good answer to that right now. i'm sure they're thinking about really hard because essentially what the us is done in the secular ration is declared a nuclear pivot in 2011, they declared hippa to asia, that is,
3:55 pm
we're containing china. we're escalating to war with china. mm hm. and then recently they've declared the nuclear pivots attorney, this is what this is. even though china is known, arsenal is only one fraction with that it's, it's 120th of what the us has and nothing is actually assembled for war. it's the i said the war has a separate from delivery vehicle. so one of the chinese thinking we can look back to history, what they did in the past. once again, in the 19161961, there was a presidential directive. essentially, the plug was to new china just for the hell of it. if we go to war with the. so the soviet union will also new all of china cities. and we expect anywhere from 60 to 90 percent destruction of all of china's cities. that was the plan in the 19 sixty's. now, how did the chinese response, did they go on a rampage and do
3:56 pm
a kind of nuclear arms race like the soviet union? no, they didn't tell you what the it, and it's something which will astonish you. during that period, the chinese were very aware that the us would upload literal, right? all the cities along the coastline where, which, which was the industrial court. and so what the chinese did secretly and they kept the secret for decades, was that they rebuilt the entire infrastructure inside the interior of the country, along hidden mountains where nobody knew this was happened. it's almost as if you can imagine, the united states decided to rebuild the chicago, pittsburgh new york at la, san jose, inside the, what, the mountains of the rockies in wyoming. and nobody knew about it. no, if you go there, if you go to the junction, you'll see there's a manhattan desk sprout out of the mountains. but the chinese approach is to, is to build not ball. so i think they'll try and de escalate this and they'll try
3:57 pm
and look for some kind of constructive way to talk the united states down from this nuclear magnet spell itself. so let's hope so. let's hope a up have a moment of de escalation by having more dialogues, something that's missing across the board right now. and once again, you and i are having a discussion about a story that you probably will not even hear if you happen to live in the united states and watch cable news or read any of the major, big city newspapers. and that ain't right. but uh, thanks k j for sharing your insight on this. appreciate it. thank you, rick. that's our show number. always be looking outside your own box to stay. don't live in boxes. if you like to say, i'm rick sanchez and we'll be looking for you next time. the
3:58 pm
the there was a time when i started to was abused to retain flowers divided the continental langford amongst themselves. it was divided as a hunting ground. if we do not to night, the corner knives as we come again, we know that they are those who want the mazda continental, this designate but the mazda clinton, and can never be stopped. because the mazda continent must be great. she will only be great. on the shoulders of our sons and daughters on by the sun all day.
3:59 pm
so now click on the goodwill time full. and let us confess about underground a mazda upon the totem, the hollywood local. now i was fucking into dreamland for dreams come true. we have approximately 10000000 people in california that are risk of becoming on house looks good man pulls up somebody forwards into pretty jobs and still not enough because of the cost of leaving also has increased coal bags and then they'll bite shift last year along the amount of, of homeless roles by 12 percent in california
4:00 pm
or the other breaking news and disturbing images from southern russia had an uprising of the jail. and the boat rod region is suppressed by special forces up to 4 inmate space to revolt . and to moscow says, you have a lot more than $5000.00 soldiers that it's ongoing in cost and eat into russia. are the visits one area which became a popular route ukrainians. they have been using google that 5 hours to hit a strictly civilian area. this is a one of the cluster munitions that did not explode. asia have we and not wrong that there is across. yeah. who for state l a place and these are something quite.

10 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on