well, taking into account the fact that naturally the united states had already created there, in the asia-pacific region, both quat and aks and this triple alliance there, the usa, japan, south korea, without a name yet, i would like, no, some powerful statement was planned by the fact that nato is going, so to speak, to asia, where, to asia, this contradicts the basic, it contradicts. met with xi, began to establish some contacts, stated that he did not want, so to speak, to confront china, a statement was born from this meeting that china is not an enemy for nato and...

welcomes, so to speak, the efforts of the united states to build some kind of bridges, so to speak. in sweden, everyone expected that finally, at this meeting, turkey and hungary would withdraw their objections and nato unity would once again be demonstrated. nothing of the kind, erdogan attacked israel, naturally, he condemns everyone who supports israel, including sweden, orban is also in no hurry to give his consent to the ratification of sweden’s accession, a year and a half has already passed, they were in vain with the finns , but with the finns, yes , but taking into account the fact that the combat potential of finland, well, with the exception of the border, of course, is long with the russian federation, and so, of course, is the combat potential of finland. and sweden

it is incomparable, sweden has it many times more, plus they also have finland wanting to return to their native shores, i don’t mean swedish, well, i wanted to because of the impudence of the statements that exist due to the aggressive russophobic policies that they are pursuing, such a feeling , that they are just really running into trouble, in their native lands, not even like the baltic ones in the emirates, they shout all the time, give it already, give it, now we ’ll slap the russian bear. they will feed in ukraine too, well, it was expected that some kind of zelensky would be outlined, that a specific plan for ukraine’s entry into nato would be outlined, and that they again developed some recommendations for reforms that should, steal less , yes, but the most important thing is corruption, of course, corruption and inefficiency of public administration, plus they have developed a long-term plan.

doesn’t do it at all, it’s not theirs, it’s not their business, they have neither money nor budget for it, but that’s all equally, therefore, you understand, for and after this stoltenberg began speaking at press conferences that expect bad news, that it is difficult for ukraine, so to speak, to supply western ones. what is the new new containment strategy for ukraine called ? need to. you see, to say

that putin, firstly, wins because puts tens of thousands, or even millions of its soldiers, but it’s only because of this that it wins, in the magazine foreing affairs, there is also a recommendation to dig deeper, get long-range missiles, and then shell the crimea, deprive the black sea fleet of a naval base altogether, that is , destroy its fleet and generally destroy the fleet , destroy the crimean bridge, then everyone will be happy, which means regarding our losses, firstly, everything is easily calculated, well, of course , because enough, so they could take satellite images, show growth territories of russian cemeteries, so that’s what i’m talking about, that they can’t do it , they don’t get it, they at one time set up a topic there for the bbc and so on, made calls, tried to verify when they realized that there’s no way...’

not it turns out that this topic was immediately stopped, there are always references to finnish intelligence, estonian intelligence, well not finnish, from estonian intelligence to ukrainian intelligence, which does not understand anything at all about losses, but there are. i’m speaking from my simple experience, but i’ve been spending every weekend there for over a year, and of course, i continue to maintain relationships with all the guys, the guys are all emotional, when something happens, they write, well, we have in common that rudolfich, there it is, well, politely speaking, we understand that the losses are not even close to that, as they try to say, that is, from the word completely, of course , that is, just completely, their losses are terrible, yes, the figure already sounds, in conclusion, 400, this includes the wounded, those who dropped out, all those who ran away, all the sanitary losses, etc. conclusion, last week there was

a statement by the deputy minister of defense of iran that that multi-role su-35 generation fighters purchased in russia have begun to arrive in iran. 4. yak-130 combat training aircraft and mi-28 helicopters, sanctions against iran ended in october of 2020, we also have everything, everything about hysterics, all american, we listened to them back in 21, we listened to them in 20, and now it’s clear that the decision has been made and iran is very much in this situation, well, i also remember from my visit, this... at the beginning of 2000, at the air base, of course, there were planes, and what’s interesting is that our planes are still standing, because we, well they complied with the sanctions, they didn’t supply spare parts , they were all american, they all fly f-18s , everything is fine, the americans are not

drawing sanctions for themselves, but for us, of course, so it’s very good that we started with aran, i think it will come to north korea, oh, north korea is generally great, regarding more losses, there are... there are always such criteria, yes, they say directly, we need to gain at least 20,000 every time, now there are videos from everywhere of men being graved, they clean, forcibly instruct, we have volunteers, who sign the contract, 452,000 have already signed for the year, it’s not over, yes, 1,600 people sign a day, by the end of december we will reach half a million volunteers, we don’t use conscripts and there’s no need for mobilization, but why? well, that’s the point, when people march, moreover, the logic is very simple, firstly, it’s a patriotic feeling, and most importantly, people wouldn’t go if they were dying at a terrible

speed, you can’t fool a person, a person won’t go to die, a person goes to fight to win, you understand that there are human the conditions are fully secured, everything is in order with payments. people know, people don’t go by chance, they go, as a rule, to those units , well, they come to their military registration and enlistment office, that is , they know who, that they often know which commander they will go to, often they go to their friends, this is already now in general , things are happening completely differently, please, moreover, vladimirovich, there is a cash flow to the regions, because our contract workers are provided with a fairly high salary, if you compare it with the average in the region, then it is. much more, of course, moreover, i already heard there that the wives of contract soldiers stop going to work, because why, they have money at home, well, i, since we now have a military-scientific society, i’ll put on

a professor’s robe, and naturally , there is no society without a conceptual approach to the world, that is, we must proclaim what we stand for, and what we think about, so yesterday my friend gave me an interesting concept that i would like to add to our club, so to speak, it's called the political singularity, yeah, yeah, what's it about? this? it's about the fact that we are approaching, the world is approaching a certain point of no return. where there will be some kind of black hole, well, as we know, most likely a black hole, we will come close, but then we will turn somewhere in the other direction, as usually happens in development, yes, but how does this manifest itself, this is this approach to a black hole, in that no concepts that have existed for the last

decade work anymore, people lose their bearings, decisions are made that in the future have no logic... have no logic, such as germany’s refusal of russian gas, or something , what you just described. what is happening in nato, that is, some completely chaotic movements are being adopted, and development is becoming both uncontrollable and incomprehensible, where it is leading, that is , such chaos appears in people’s heads, and the chaos, apparently , is quite irreversible, and here it is necessary understand that they, these people, make decisions that logically make no sense. in fact, they are approaching and leading us to a huge crisis, and if you look at

the situation that has developed now, at even they, stoltenberg himself, understands that defeat is inevitable. and here’s the worst thing, they don’t have a plan, they don’t have a plan b, they don’t understand, they’re going to lose this war in ukraine. and then what, they associate the defeat in ukraine with defeat. nato, and this means defeat, everything, everything is collapsing, oh-oh, oh-oh, where next, let us offer them another concept, think for them and suggest how things can end, but here we are as a military-scientific society let's look at the europe of the future after our victory, let’s say, well, look, there is such a pleasant country called austria, it’s kind of... neutral, there is slovakia, which just said that, well, something

feels uncomfortable for me next to this warring ukraine, i’d rather not i will help, there is hungary with orban, which says, i also don’t want anything to do with this, then there is the whole region of yugoslavia, serbia and so on and so forth, why not say, let’s say we are from this central europe, a very good place , let's make neutral territory, let's make such an austro-hungarian, i was waiting for this to sound, we will revive the great austro-hungary from poland, we will push habsburg out of our own, by the way, to the mediterranean sea to the balkans, let's say, guys, we will not attack you, we will, yes, we will even deploy our own contingent so that no one attacks them. we will supply you with gas and oil , we will trade with you, you will be a bridge to the west and

so on, let’s do this, let’s get together and show that europe has a future after our victory, but will remain, will remain in the emirates, and even before they will also be asked the question, or maybe return to neutrality, or maybe , on the contrary, return to the harbor from which they fled in the nineties, yes, but let's give them some... taiwan to china, that's also a good approach for you, productive, so come on, let's really let's think about it, but here's what, i agree, in this uncertainty, very clearly, just the day before yesterday, so to speak, partners, they

bend and bend their line, that's right, but in troubled waters, we need to clearly understand that in all this mess, in all this political singularity and in all this uncertainty, we need to make our policy clear because it is. already designated as a factor of influence , a factor in constructing the world we want , we set certain frameworks, we set certain conceptual things, how it should be structured, which is what we do, what we do, including in economics, but not completely yet, in politics, by the way, quite successfully, with brix and everything else, and lastly, maybe we can comment on aristovich a little bit, right? he's happy now, it's clear the way he watches our programs, we can soon call him an expert, we can. military scientific

society - what is it about? just here i am, as a member, i hope, a real, active, at least a member of the military-scientific society, i can’t help but quote who once said: to foresee this in time, and here you can , looking at that situation, turn to to those people on the other side. dividing lines, yes, if anyone still has brains left, think about the future, now is the moment when your decision, if you don’t bleed stained, maybe it will save you, this is a very difficult question, because i ’ve been watching them for a long time, like spiders in a jar, they ran,

so klyuchko says, no, of course we must support. the president, but he will answer for his mistakes, and his rating is falling, and in general this is not democracy, this is a dictatorship, before i give you the floor, i just want to say, on the other hand, we understand all the hints, we understand , why are nato members so twitchy, well, because for them, zelsky baltun, whose task is to trade weapons, to they treat the zaluzhny differently, that is, he speaks to them, at least with the military , in the same language, uh-huh, i don’t understand that in the translation into russian, he also said: the zaluzhny is the khan. yes. and what zelsky says is that it’s like, you’re to blame, you didn’t give us weapons. but they don’t understand where to give it. yes. well, how could it be possible to give the required number of planes, but who would fly there? only a fool can say, let’s give a bunch of f16s now. who will serve and who will pilot? this is a whole system. here he is, a magnificent member,

so to speak, of the political singularity, when, well, of course, that is, therefore, when they pronounce. stupid words, for the military , they don’t mean anything, yeah, why did aristovich begin to talk like that, but he, of course, we understand, he’s a man who has known there for more than 20 years, zaluzhny, they will now try to get sympathizers here through aristovich, who will tell us that now there will be a coup there, and you will help them and come to an agreement with them, but damn they guessed right, yeah, you can’t trust them, not a single one in a word, this is... absolutely true, absolutely true, why stalin was sharply against the liquidation of hitler, yeah, because he was sure that whoever came to replace hitler would come to an agreement with the allies, so this

cardboard fool must be taken care of - then no, but you can’t trust anyone who comes, because that’s what it is. then tell us, okay, let us even give you this, well, this is what is written in your constitution, okay, let’s use this border, we will withdraw the troops, this is no longer enough, everything is not enough, the point is, what about plan b, because even at the peak of fantasies absolutely divorced from reality on the topic of some kind of military victory, all the more or less political analysts in the west and so on always said we are counting on... stabilization within russia, this was the main element in any case, that is, no one seriously, well, there except for complete idiots, there, unfortunately, in my homeland and there are some there in the baltics, i never thought that it was possible purely by military means, in fact win and create a situation that will lead to destabilization, so that today an extremely unfair world can destabilize russia, which will

be perceived by most of society as a concession, there is this notorious agreement, and here is what i actually believe today is a great achievement of russia. this is an expansion of the pluralism of discussions, we used to be proud, but they said in ukraine, with all our chaos, problems and so on, we have a field for discussion, we now have no poly discussions, the verkhovna rada has long been no place for discussion, and russia has become a place for discussion, yes in a broad sense, but if what you said is absolutely correct, well, i’m sure that this will not happen, there is reason to think so logic by. there will be no obscene peace, but if this happened, this would be a reason to destabilize russia in this, i am all the time, when there to my fellow countrymen there, well, more with europeans, with fellow countrymen it is still very difficult, unfortunately, there we can compare them, they are mostly either here there or in belarus or somewhere else, those who stayed there are either afraid, or, unfortunately, are trying

to continue to pretend that they are still listening to onistovich there, but they still don’t agree with him, let’s put it this way, so i keep saying: what does it make you think that russia is in a hurry? so far, i don’t see a single reason to believe from the point of view of economics, military affairs, political situations, foreign policy that putin is in a hurry somewhere, that is, why suddenly? therefore, when they, their main problem, that is, they seem to know these stages, but they have already come to the understanding that yes, you are right, it starts in the west, something needs to be negotiated there, but they proceed from the presumption as soon as we come to the claim? let's come to an agreement, here everyone will immediately say, of course, we have been waiting for a long time, it is unclear with what joy, of course, this is not because there , you know, someone there told something to someone somewhere in the kulaar, logic processes, here everything that, by the way, generally happens around this tragedy. our ukrainian there, it correlates very well with the simple laws of historical development, that is, everything happens exactly as it should happen, regardless of will, even , that is, it is not because putin,

biden, or something else wanted it there, there is a logic of historical development, it goes exactly this way, from this point of view, in vladimiravich’s place there would be anyone else the president, given his current state, he would not have entered into negotiations, obscene peace, because all the cards are in hand today gradually, there are more and more of them. more with all the problems, with all the nuances and so on, yes, people die, naturally, this is the main, the only criterion that i, i see i understand that there is a huge moral imperative for the entire russian leadership to try to somehow resolve this, but there is also an understanding that an obscene peace is an even worse war tomorrow, so it is necessary to resolve this, as it were, many people there do not understand this, it’s clear that people have emotions there in ukraine and so on, but i tell them: no one wants to get such a peace from the russian side and you shouldn’t want it, which will lead to a new war tomorrow, and any such temporary little world, and absolutely that's right

will make it possible to preserve the situation in ukraine, when again i even say ukraine, i don’t even want to say call it ukraine, because this is not at all the country in which i was born there, where i lived there, where i was a people’s deputy, and so on , there banderstat, you can call it whatever you want, because this is not at all the ukraine that... we are kind of used to it, that is, they killed this essence of ukraine, well , let’s conditionally call ukraine while it remains a source of danger from the point of view purely simple criteria of national security for russia , there can be no compromise, it doesn’t matter, the question is not in the territories, the question is really that drones will fly tomorrow and says that this is done by the russian volunteer corps or whatever it’s called, what else will happen, that’s it there is, roughly speaking, to get conditional hamas in this territory, yes, which - or some other radical one there, which is simply as they say: we do not recognize the existence of the state of israel, we will fight with it, by any means, as long as the state exists

israel, if such a regime remains on the territory of my homeland, then naturally moscow cannot make such a compromise, this is understandable to any person who understands at least a little bit why this all started in the first place, in fact, but not really for the sake of the kherson, zaporozhye region there or even the donbass, it began because russia was solving the key vital issue of survival in the conditions of aggressive pressure from the west, by the way, this is why i will allow myself to argue, but there is no need to offer them anything and rebuilding is actually a problem , it’s actually easy for them to come to an agreement, because the west has no existential interest in all this continuing, by and large, if we put it aside, really, these are their claims to hegemony, they have nothing there lose ... in a way, but for russia, yes, russia had nowhere to retreat, that is, roughly speaking, ukraine, if it had remained neutral there , balancing between russia and the west,

the west in fact lost nothing, except for some dreams , empty ambitions, hopes up to now rule the whole world, which he objectively cannot do even regardless of the situation in ukraine, and for russia to allow ukraine to become a member of nato, this is all as it were, that is, and this was actually clear to everyone, and when i remember saying , in ukraine there will be either adequate politicians friendly to russia or russian tanks, there now i have a criminal case there for this, but again this is not because it’s true, but because it’s true, of course, and when we told them that guys, how many criminal cases do you have? well, one thing for now, but right away sovereign zrada, sovereign zrada for 15 years , well, there are eight of you, yes, you know, and i wanted to conclude, i wanted to say, to actually offer europe nothing, we should not think about how they can save themselves, because then where europe has driven itself, this is their own huge problem, fortunately people

there are beginning to see the light, that is, russia should not come out and say, guys, we love you very much, again this is where we started, let us now try you where - bad people took you to the wrong place, and now we’re here again we’ll save it, we’ll rearrange everything there, but for god ’s sake, they like it this way, they like nalena berbock, let it be nalena berbock, thank god she’s already starting to like it less, so and so on, orban, who was yesterday, that’s what distinguishes orban, so to speak, from scholz, yes, that is, well, there, well, the key criterion, for orbán it is not important to shake hands in davos in a conditional way, but for scholz it is important, so when we say german, you are correct, this is not the european elite, this is the globalist elite, they are in this party, in davos they are used to they are invited there, they will shake their hand, they will not be invited, by the way, in russia there were plenty of such comrades too, in certain circles, especially there, of course. uh, they won’t invite you, this is already a disaster, it’s the collapse of your personal career. orban allowed himself: you don’t love me , you don’t love me, my voter loves me, the citizens love me, this is the fundamental difference

between them, and in this sense, that is... orban is not a friend of russia, he is a friend of hungary, but it just so happened that it is logical that russia today wants to build a world where every state can share its sovereignty and that is, therefore, unlike the west , some here also of course happen in rhetoric , russia does not have an anti-western course, there is a non -western course, that is, no one says that russia’s task is to destroy nato, the european union or the united states there, well, i at least at the leadership level, i am equal to the leadership, i don’t hide it, i say, they are our enemy must be destroyed, not like people, everything is fine, when a person sits like putin at a big chessboard, he understands perfectly well that it is important that russia received its worthy place in the world, absolutely true , in some other situation the west may turn out to be useful, let’s not have any of our other strategic partners there, but everyone has their own interests, and there will be a lot of emotion about friendship with china there or with someone else -it’s not worth it, history knows.

examples, the west can still be very useful, not to mention the fact that i always say this, from the point of view of cultural affiliation, value there, emotional, psychological, historical, but still part of the pan-european civilization, just its healthier part, which still remembers that a family is a man and a woman, that the task of a family is to raise children, yes, only the west forgot about this, right, but russia should not fall into eurasianism and to say that we are not europe at all, she must say, we are the europe that you lost in your country because we are indisputably more than europe, we just need to understand here that there is europe, that is, well, considering what we have there france goes to bed six times in the krasnoyarsk territory by territory, it’s difficult for us to be europe, in a geographical sense , only we are much larger, relatively speaking, minsk, for example, in terms of cleanliness, in terms of neatness, this is the european city where people used to go, why are we going to europe, remember in the nineties, not because it’s clean there, today in europe

it’s dirty, we just often appealed to this, but this is a big topic, again , of our understanding of ourselves, that is, where we are and what we are, because what we call europeanism has actually arrived from the middle east, that is, if we already take christianity as such, then it spread to the territory of the roman empire, so this is a separate complex topic, well, i can’t help but add that this is a discussion, a discussion in society, right. next time come in a robe yes.

i’ve spent my whole life working towards this, we expect to do it in 10 days, it will be a record, cut it, on the verge of possibilities, we are all with him, because he is the only one, at the maximum height, higher, don’t rise, you’ll just fall. down,

at the speed of the wind, it's a super cyclone, a killer cyclone, it's like it's chasing you, what do you want it is necessary, master of the wind,

it doesn’t matter. as you say, we are not from europe.