thank you very much for your devotion, to the values ​​for which we live and for which we fight, i am a pashtun, an afghan, i am a russian soldier, have the honor, they look at this glow of our donetsk, every night it attracts them, we do not we let you in and don’t let us in.

we watch to know everything about russia, the best historical series, we watch, we watch, in the application or on the website, we return to the celebration of constitution day, today marks the 30th anniversary of the adoption of the main one.

law of the country, now a reflection on the constitution of director vladimir bortok. hello, i'm director vladimir bortka, and i'm from st. petersburg. for me, as for you, i think the most important thing is the existence of the homeland. how is its future, which is what i want to talk about, who, besides its worst enemies, will strive to dismember russia , our state that has existed for many centuries, is this possible in principle, alas, yes, russia is a multinational and multi-religious country, consisting of many peoples their ancestral lands, on which...

without which russia is cut off from the maternal foundation of the earth, what was lost must be returned, but almost bestial. after all, to our country in the west , embodied in bloody wars with a campaign against russia, are they accidental, of course, the desire to profit from the riches of our land lies on the surface, but that’s not the point, here, perhaps, i could be wrong, but wishing well homeland, why be silent about what you think, even if it concerns...

this is my personal opinion, which does not claim to be the absolute truth, moreover, i will be glad if everything said turns out to be inaccurate and unfair, but i made conclusions with a sincere desire to understand what was happening, and

these conclusions, the proposals that follow them, are aimed at improving the life and prosperity of the russian homeland, and the accuracy of these conclusions is for you to judge. over the past thousand years, russia has ruled in a rigidly authoritarian manner, leaving its citizens no choice. if during the period of feudalism there was nothing unusual in this, other peoples also had it, but in the future the opportunity for choice was for the russians. form of political structure of the state, implying the involvement of citizens in the electoral process, where the main element is the ability of the people to elect to change the government through free and fair elections. if you place the main emphasis on

the keyword change of government, then in russia the picture changes dramatically. well, for example, maybe the country at least... unanimously elected the father of perestroika, mikhail gorbachev, and then refused to trust him. was boris elson democratically elected in democratic russia, for example, in 1996, or after the elections? vladimir putin came to power in 1999.

it seems to me that the issue is not russophobia, not hatred of us as russians. certainly, why? under the conditions of feudalism, that is, tsarist russia, this structure differed little from other european monarchies, but over time, especially after the french revolution, the world changed, and russia remained a stronghold of the outdated system. the empire collapsed,

and, i would say, a completely different ideological basis for the existence of the state appeared. but the essence of power remained the same. absolute totalitarianism, and not maybe this basis could be different, otherwise the state would collapse, why is that? a little later, the emerging state of the ussr , born on the basis of the most western progressive ideology at that time, remained totalitarian, everyone was obliged to share a single point of view, just like the countries of people's democracy, by the way, maybe i'm wrong, but it seems that those who came in place of the ussr, the russian federation is an authoritarian state, that is. with the appearance of a democratic system and existing economic freedom, citizens

cannot and should not encroach on the inviolability of the supreme power that holds statehood together, so the point is not in russophobia, in non-acceptance of our state structure, but once again, why russia is like this, let’s consider, in addition to other differences, countries can be mononational and an idea that does not need explanation, a national state is a state on

the territory of which various nations, ethnic groups, nationalities live, for example, russia, china, they need an idea or reason that unites the different peoples that are part of a common national state, ideas that force the people with their land and history to enter into a common state. defending it for russia for centuries was the idea of ​​monarchism. the god-given monarch united all the peoples of the national state, while the differences between nationalities were erased, for all of them were not tatars, yakuts or russians, but subjects of god’s chosen ruler. an absolute monarch, such as the russian tsar, ruled the country autocratically for life if his personality or the policies he pursued were not satisfactory.

did not want to defend this state, the interests of the tsar and the elite diverged, it’s funny, of course, but the ussr collapsed for a similar reason. in the structure of the monarchy lies its destruction. in this case, this gebel was clearly embodied in the image of the weak tsar nicholas. actually, the personal quality of the monarch is the achilles heel of any absolute monarchy.

republics and regions contributed as much as possible to the identification and consolidation of the national elites that are part of russia. in fact, she raised and prescribed them. it's incredible that these elites would accept a representative of the house of romanov or someone else, as a god-given monarch and an exponent of his interests, therefore, the interests of his peoples. and what is on the territory. of the former empire, marxism, and not a parliamentary republic

, triumphed, is absolutely logical, since marxian ideology turned out to be the most suitable ideology for cementing a multinational country, an ideology that unites all its many peoples with one goal, building the most just society, ideologies that are not interested, or at least which should not be interested in the nationality of the participant in this construction, or ideology. which replaced various religions with one faith, faith in the possibility of building a just future, but at the same time this ideology traditionally allowed the country to be firmly governed from a single center. ideally , marxist teaching requires truthful answers to any questions that are not veiled by the veil of political correctness or religious morality. the communists lost when they began to lie to themselves. in general, when a person begins to demand faith in something, backed by science and practice, he

inevitably loses. there cannot be universal equality. was started, there cannot be universal equality, but everyone must be equal in receiving the most necessary things for life and providing, equal starting conditions and a standard of living worthy of a person, for we, humanity, must be happy about the appearance of the light of any human

individual, and must provide him decent living conditions, regardless of his physical... and mental abilities, of course, if a person wants to survive and continue to exist on the planet, then this will lead him to attempts again and again to change the existing order of things, built on the law of the jungle, on bare violence, the rule of the strong only, but what happened happened as soon as the ideological component holding the country together was removed, the ideological state collapsed. this was a victory for our historical opponents, who understood that it was impossible to break russia from outside, but they did it from within, not without success, practically repeating the technique that destroyed the russian empire in 1917, and they also acted

through the decomposition of the ussr elite, why? the ussr broke so easily, it was betrayed by the top leadership of the country, but where was its invincible army, the super-powerful kgb, oops, all its law enforcement agencies were aimed at destroying external and internal enemies, but not at opposing their own supreme power, destroying the country, so they, accustomed to carry out orders from above, they were inactive. after the arrival of vladimir putin, which meant the end of the era of the nineties.

when it is created from different lands of nations, being, moreover, at different stages of their social development, in the absence of an idea that unites the peoples, requires a strong central government, as a force that binds the peoples, for the russian federation consists not only of different peoples, but of different states, well, for example, tatarstan, according to constitution of tatarstan, it... has its own death, flag, coat of arms, president, but most importantly, its own land history. and democracy, that is, the elected government, with such a structure of the federation, is forced to be somewhat conditional. when used with nothing unlimited democracy of the control elite

of the various states included in the federation, that is, people who are now deprived of power, but strongly desire to have it. having the opportunity to propagate their ideas, they can play on the national chords of their peoples, which can divide the federation into national territories. something similar happened in the nineties, when, to put it mildly, the not very smart president yelsin said: take as much independence as you want, it began. the russian federation was really facing the division of the country. and they were needed. president putin’s remarkable efforts to preserve the state of russia, in fact, the howl that rose against putin from the liberal media, which is essentially anti-national and expresses anti-russian interests, has only one reason: putin did not allow russia to fall apart.

moreover, he expanded it, this is why he is valuable , he will remain in the history of russia, regardless of what he has done and will do, but energetic actions to consolidate the national state rests largely on the personality of this statesman, it is worth replacing him a less powerful leader, and we may once again be faced with the collapse of the state. naturally , the central government seeks to prevent this, the so-called sovereign democracy is coming, its

author, vladislav surkov, defines it as a way of political life, a society in which the authorities, their bodies and actions, are chosen, formed, directed for the russian nation in all its diversity and integrity for the sake of achieving material, freedom of justice by all citizens, social groups and peoples, its constituents. the meaning of this stream of thought is to disguise the authoritarian structure of the state, but such a state, held together by a strong, central authoritarian power, the supreme ruler, because it is not strengthened by anything else, is essentially almost feudal, one can joke, but with it nobles appear. as they would be called, then the officials guarding power, all well-being completely depends on the supreme ruler, if they do not depend on the supreme ruler, or do not depend completely,

the federation may collapse, therefore, in order to preserve the central government, it is necessary to feed the layer of nobles in various ways, to demonstratively punish individual representatives who have exploded, while corruption is inevitable as an element of feeding the nobles.

the past structure and the necessary new structure of the state, allowing it to be stable and strong, without supports in the form of an irreplaceable tsar-father, the national guard and

the central election commission. due to the uncertainty of the timing of the end of the special military operation and the deteriorating economic condition of each family tension in society increases. and the recent events in magachkala, in my opinion, are from the same series, i repeat, with

the defeat of a special military operation. or even its end is not very clear, the collapse of the country may begin, the separation of national entities with catastrophic consequences for the population of these regions. the war must be won. this, in my opinion, is the first and main condition for the future of our homeland. after this, begin to develop new conditions for the existence of the russian federation, take into account.

and this day lives among the people, and not by chance, some wars during a special military operation raise red flags as a sign of the victory of justice, because once again the disintegration of the country is impossible, it is not beneficial to anyone except the scoundrels, but precisely because the disintegration of the country is not conceivable, it would be necessary to bring the structure of the state in accordance with the changed political and historical conditions. the possible meaning of these changes: the transformation of our country into a unitary, decentralized state, which does not include any state entities that have elements of sovereignty, and where the components into administrative-territorial units, regions, territories, districts, provinces and the like are subordinate to the central authorities, but regional authorities

are formed. new zealand, japan, indonesia, spain, italy, many others. in any case , a revision of the constitution is necessary and not amendments to it, but serious changes. there is no better time than the present to change the constitution after our victory in a special military operation, but there will be victory behind us, that's all.

permission for commissioning, the final stage of construction of the nuclear power plant is ahead. ek-52 helicopters in the special operation zone, the crew is working in the krasnolimansky direction. footage of the destruction of a network of strongholds of the ukrainian armed forces is published by the ministry of defense. abnormal frosts in siberia in the urals in the svetlovsk

region temperature. up to -44. what is the forecast for central russia? let's ask our meteorologists. a very slippery road to knowledge. this is what the route to school looks like in rostov- on-don. how. in the region copes with