these events with the way our sworn friends in the west view them, how they coincide in intonation, in approach, in analysis. the consequence of bolshevik policy, millions of civilians who died from hunger and epidemics, industrialization through the slave labor of prisoners, is interpreted this way. the industrialization breakthrough, collectivization , is simplistically given as a wholesale confiscation of property from the cat and the land of the wealthy christians, a universal pen on the collective farm. it is important to pay attention to the connection between collectivization and mass famine in ukraine in kazakhstan, which actually supports the mythology near home, actively used in anti-russian propaganda. repression.

one gets the impression of a struggle against the intelligentsia as a social group as such, it is reported along with the fact that about 20 million people went through the gulag system, the numbers in reality are significantly less, in general, there are statistics, studies on this subject, historians adhere to different positions, but the figures are fundamentally overestimated. but i think,

that the clearest example of such mythologization , so to speak, of the crimes of our country, for which we are gladly accused, are the historians, it just seems to me that from this example we can draw very important conclusions, in principle , about how the image of our fatherland is created in... people, look, this is the story of the execution of polish officers in kotyn. in 1943, the german ministry of propaganda under the leadership of goebbels reported that a mass grave of polish officers had been found in the katyn forest, smolensk region, and the ussr is to blame for this, that is, the country with which germany waged a fierce war. by the way, all the documents. the germans took them to

germany, when the red army began to approach, they simply burned them. by the end of the forty -third year, smolensk was liberated, and a commission under the leadership of academician nikolai burdenok began to investigate. while hiding these burials , german bullets were found. in addition, letters that were written after the arrival of the germans. the commission came to the conclusion that the dead were prisoners who were not evacuated in time. retreat, they found themselves in territory occupied by the germans and were shot by the nazis. the katyn massacre appears in the indictment of the international tribunal in nuremberg. section three. a war crime sounds like this: in september 1941 in katyn. near smolensk

, the nazis carried out mass murders of polish captured officers, well, in principle, this could be an end, but then the nineties come and on april 13 , 1990, the president of the soviet union, mikhail gorbachev, conveys to those who arrived in moscow, to the president of poland, wojciech jeruzelski , milestone lists.

by the quality of the paper you can determine the time, place where it was written, who wrote it and where this paper was made. as a result, by the decision of the european court of human rights (echr) on june 18, 2012, the documents presented as evidence of russia’s guilt in... the kotyn case were recognized as fake, and today new evidence is still appearing in the archives, listen, some of them were declassified fsb documents that were recently published in our media information, this is the testimony of a german soldier,

his name was arno duret, this is a long-known witness who testified during the leningrad trial that it was he who participated in digging graves in katyn...

history, everything is done according to the same manual, then cats, today is a storm, listen, the word katyn comes from the polish root kat, which in translation means executioner, torturer, killer, this word kat, it is

in polish, ukrainian, belarusian, it initially gives the formulation, this dualism, to the study of everything catonian crimes, if we move on to... in the same way, the yeltsin center rewrites the meaning of the soviet army in the victory over hitler's germany, because the main emphasis is on the fact that the allies won. look, the great patriotic war is a holy war, without which

it would seem unthinkable to consider russian history, but eltsin sentor considers russian history without the great patriotic war. the only way the great patriotic war is presented is this. dear comrades, as i said, a sign of your military merits, you are awarded a personal service pit weapon, i congratulate you, well , as a souvenir of our meeting, here on each

of you you see other small badges, a copy of the presidential standard, i congratulate you and once again to you... again of course, i'm filming, i'm filming, thank you.

yes, not serious with yours, your idea, yes, mine, i ’m too pretentious, yes, yes, there’s no such thing anymore , there’s definitely no such thing anymore, well, it will appear, thank you bolshoyorovich, thank you, god forbid that it doesn’t appear again, it will definitely appear, nothing can be done about it, they’ll do it, it doesn’t matter, let it go guys, thank you very much, good luck, happy new year, happy new year, hugs, goodbye. vladimir putin in novogorev held a meeting with participants in a special military operation;

we will return to this and other topics on our air, now the continuation of the besagon program. but to this one of the main museums of the country, from 600 to 800 people come every day, on weekends up to 2000, and these are mostly young people, schoolchildren are taken there to listen to lectures. i don’t want there to be a feeling that... i keep saying: yeltsin, yeltsin, yeltsin center and so on, yes, the name doesn’t matter, understand , yeltsin’s name is a cover, call it whatever you want, differently, a museum of modern history, leave the same programs, leave the same concept, the same ideology, and it will still be a destructive institution, and the individual no longer matters. because his name and personality were very successfully used to ensure that

this museum was inviolable, and as for the agreements with nato, which is cited as the success of our policy, then the sad results of this policy, unfortunately, because in 1999 poland, the czech republic and hungary joined nato. and in 2004, bulgaria, estonia, latvia, lithuania, romania, slovakia, slovenia, croatia and albania. that is, the verbal promise that we will not come close to the russian borders has led to the fact that there are nato bases along almost the entire perimeter of our country’s borders. and, although the honored teacher of the russian federation, and now a foreign agent, tamara aidelma. she once said that nato was created as a defensive organization, and it cannot commit aggression

he can, even if he really wants to. i will not enter into polemics with ms. edelman, now a citizen, in my opinion, of portugal; i want to tell you a little about who led nato for quite a long time. time, and you yourself will draw your own conclusions about what kind of defensive organization this is, listen, hans speidel from 1957 to... 1963, nato commander in central europe, formerly chief of staff of army group b under rommel, adolf heusenberg in 1961-64, chairman of the nato military committee, during the second world war, chief of the operations department of the general staff

ground forces of the wehrmacht, germany. vaughn kleimansek in 1967-1968, nato commander in central europe, previously an officer of the wehrmacht general staff. johann steinhof. in 1971-1974, german representative at nato headquarters. before this , az luftwawe was on the eastern front. ernst ferberg from 1973 to 1975, nato commander in central europe, formerly inspector of the wehrmacht high command. franz josef schulze from 1977 to 1979, nato commander in

central europe, formerly a lufwaffe officer, knight. coming to a government meeting in pink high-heeled shoes, isn’t this a romanticization of abomination, everything is nearby, this star and this

government on the floor. do you know what this kind of performance leads to? on the heels of government men against violence against women, do you know what this leads to? to the fact that men in power cannot even formulate what a woman is in general. listen to what the us secretary of education, miguel cardona, says, answering the question, what is a woman? tell me please, what is a woman? my employees provide equal access for all students, including lgbt students, access without discrimination. so you are not responsible for the question, you did not give me a definition of a woman? i think this is secondary in such an important job as

the work of the minister of education, this is not a secondary issue, but a simple one, what definition of a woman will the minister give? i head the ministry. clearly, you are not going to answer the question. but this is the prime minister of new zealand also trying to answer the same question. i will ask again what definition of woman you will give. as i said, i don't i was expecting such a question, so this is not homework right now, but from the point of view of gender identity, i believe that people determine gender identity for themselves, look how gently, carefully the concept of parent is introduced into our everyday life. for example, in the sverdlovsk region, look, when

registering a child for school, when choosing the type of relationship. the following answer options are offered: trustee, adoptive parent, mother, parent, father, guardian, other, can you explain to me what this is? i just want to understand that this? don’t we feel, and we say in almost every program, how gradually, here and there, without washing, rolling, this attempt penetrates. to lead the country into the trend that our civilized colleagues want to lead it into, here’s another, well, completely meaningless example, for example, we have already said, tamara aidelman, who in 1922 was, therefore, declared a foreign agent, yes, and this did not stop her

from publishing a book with her translation in 2023, this is a small world history of the british historian ernst gombrich. and here are the words from this books: one russian tsar who reigned around 1580 was called ivan the terrible and for good reason.

for small children, where it is written that the translation was made by a foreign agent who is generally undesirable in his presence or activities in the country, what is this, what is it called, how should the state treat it, or not at all, but it should treat it somehow, if we want to preserve our identity, i don’t want to remind anymore... the name of the first president, but i don’t know what other evidence is needed, what other arguments should be there to understand that

this institute is a real, powerful agency mechanism, and a very expensive one at that, listen to what... says the president of the fund , russian entrepreneur sergei pisarev. i took as an example the report for the seventeenth year, it exists in the public domain, the following things are written there: this means that the income of this object this year, the seventeenth, was 3 billion rubles, of which 100 million were own income, but apparently rent for renting premises and 2.9 billion is a kind of voluntary contribution.

there is such a russian, russian company yandex, for example, if on average the yeltsin center is visited by 30-35,000 people per month, and

the audience of yandex itself is 90 million people per month, on the music platform yandex-music until recently you could hear this song by the rapper scrooge bavovna, where he simply says directly:

in yandex taxi, drivers with the letters z on their cars are not allowed on the line, the pit car does not comply with the rules of the service, well, what is this emphasized, the rules of the service say that i cannot hang stickers advertising other services, links to websites and so on, right? the external appearance of your car does not comply with the rules of the service; on the yandex-zen site they continue to earn money from the agent. promotes to the masses, allowing those to earn money, and this is on the russian platform , who freely offers and wants to kill russians, who will explain to me how this is possible, now look at this, this is the director of marketing for yandex services, andrey sebrand.

here is a variation after the first question asked to him, the first question i would like to ask is about the yandex company, why is there such a huge number of people who it’s almost as if they don’t like russia , they create such an impression, you know, i don’t have such a feeling, excuse me, if we are going to write a political report, we can remove this question then, guys, here...

today we are standing on the threshold the last, perhaps, battle for our lives, for our future, for ourselves, but if we honestly face the truth, do not be afraid to speak this truth, understand it, if we believe in our destiny.

ukrainian flag, which stands in defense of its orthodox faith, protects a charming little ukrainian girl from the kiev-pechersk lavra, without fear , without a doubt, and it seems to me that she is much stronger, wiser and deeper than all ukrainian politicians combined and not only... ukrainian ones, because faith, hope and love, look, christ will rise from the dead, death by death, christ in the city, gave life, christ will rise from the dead by death.