in 2014, our goal is to stop this war, and we did not start it in 2022, this is an attempt to stop it, and vladimir putin also commented on the rumors circulating in the west about an alleged possible russian invasion of european countries. do you think nato is concerned that this could escalate into a global war or? even in a nuclear conflict, in any case, they talk about it, they try to intimidate their population with an imaginary russian threat, this is an obvious fact, and thinking people, well, not ordinary people, but thinking people, analysts, those involved in real politics, well, just smart people, understand perfectly well that this is a fake, the russian threat is being inflated. do you mean the threat

of a russian invasion, for example, in poland or latvia? can you imagine a scenario where you send russian troops to poland? only in one case, if there is an attack on russia from poland, so why? because we have no interests, neither in poland, nor in latvia, anywhere, why do we need this? here is another topic from a sensational interview with...

we never collect, stated the press secretary of the russian president dmitry peskov. for us, the most important thing is always the reaction of our people, our readers , listeners, this is the most important, most valuable and most important thing, so that as many people as possible want to read this interview. of course, interest abroad is also important, because putin expresses precisely his worldview, his vision of the reasons, the current stage and prospects of what is happening.

on youtube, as well as his page on the social network x and his personal website. there are even those who demands the arrest of the journalist, saying treason, incitement to war and similar nonsense. in fact, the opposition has already begun; google search algorithms do not provide links to the full version of the interview, although, again , it is posted on several platforms. links only to short excerpts in mainstream western media. well, as for

the western media themselves, their reaction is predictably hysterical, and there are not even attempts to play any serious analytics, just propaganda sayings. cnn believes that carlson asked the russian president lungs and convenient questions, that is, he played horseshoes, and putin eventually won quotes: an easy victory. the british gardaí called the interview a quote "a new level of odiousness for carlosan." only bloomberg tried to play with objectivity; it writes that during the interview vladimir putin showed a tough approach to the ukrainian topic, and not only to it. when you pick up a profit debit card, you will immediately discover all the possibilities of incredibly profitable conditions: a high percentage on the balance, cashback on purchases of up to 3%. with the card

, it doesn’t matter whether you spend or save, in either way, incredible benefit with you. bank, ural sib. so, more about the consequences of the most high-profile political interview in recent months, our colleague boris ivanin. even tucker carlson’s opponents had to recognize vladimir putin as the winner after a resonant interview since the days of his work on television, the cnn channel, and the propaganda arm of the us democratic party, whose candidate, despite all efforts, is losing support. voters, and the video from the kremlin threatens to completely collapse the ratings of the head of the white house. what putin wanted and what achieved, first of all, this is open access to the american audience, and this is really important because he feels that the traditional media is not covering what he is talking about, and he needs this interview to

reach the american public, and this is likely will influence the upcoming us elections this year. the question is whether he will be able to do this, and this is only one. before the interview was released, commentators in the western press tried in every possible way to dismiss it. so that it is clear to everyone, because in the usa there was a more than two-hour conversation with the russian president caused a stir in advance, they will study this interview very carefully, they will

analyze it, it is clear that there is a tendency to, well, there is such a, you know, professional, of course, reluctance to publish the interview that was given to carlson, because there is. .. into the past, as if the stacker were speaking, the history of russia itself came as a surprise and revelation to many. they had a long-awaited interview that probably didn't go the way anyone expected, and it wouldn't have happened if it weren't for tucker.

carlson, his brand, his persistence, to be honest, his professionalism, his reputation brought him to the kremlin and allowed him to talk with the president of russia. we should also be grateful to vladimir putin for being willing to sit down to start this dialogue. now he presented information in a context that is accessible to an american audience, this is the main value of this interview. i think this is an outstanding interview, no topics were off limits. tucker asked questions directly. vladimir putin's body language gives us understand that he was relaxed. most of the time he sat away. throwing himself back in his chair, that was the clear message. he very clearly stated the country's position that russia had several times proposed to the united states to come to an agreement, and that it was the west that insisted on nato expansion to the east. carlson himself also felt relaxed and after the conversation showed a hefty folder of documents handed over by vladimir putin,

a clear sign of trust. and the audience award is ready to be presented to tucker by american actor james woods, who himself for the role journalist in one of oliver stone's films was nominated for an oscar. tucker's interview ... exceeded all my expectations. carlson was prepared sincerely. putin is brilliantly evasive, especially on issues discussed by the intelligence services. it was very nice to watch real journalism. millions of people around the world are watching this. watch vladimir putin's interviews on the internet and have already beaten any television ratings in the united states. tucker's former place of work is also inferior to the fox news channel and the business msnbc , and even more so to cnn. mainstream press on west is dead. this is the main media. conversation in the kremlin, there are still political results ahead, the new york times admits with a creaking heart. overall, putin's appearance underscored his tactical confidence as his rivals are now vulnerable. ukraine is struggling on the battlefield, further military aid has stalled in the us congress, and kremlin-friendly politics are on the rise on

both sides of the atlantic. vladimir putin’s conversation with an american reporter overshadowed any other news, it was even reflected in memes. one of the most popular about karls na... who flew away, but promised to return, at least in the form of his followers, after tucker , several dozen foreign media have already requested an interview with the russian leader over the past few days. boris ivanin, anna nikolaevich, lead. by chance or intentionally, in order to attract the attention of the audience, the us president decided to make an address just at the moment when american viewers were glued to their monitors watching the long-awaited interview with vladimir putin. so, the main goal of the unscheduled the statement apparently was a desire to convince the nation that his memory was fine. and he knows how to lead the country better than anyone. the reason was the publication of the report of special prosecutor robert hur,

which spoke about the mishandling of secret documents, and biden used them in his residence after leaving the post of vice president in the seventeenth year. the prosecutor noted that biden should be allowed through because, forgive him, because he cooperated with the investigation and is a well-meaning elderly man with poor memory. according to hur, listening. in fact , biden has forgotten what year his term as vice president began, when it ended, and even what year his son beau died. biden's reservations this week added to the concerns. he said that he communicated with the late veteran instead of macron, helmunt kole, instead of angela merkel, and called the leader of egypt assisti the president of mexico. argentina has the second highest inflation rate in the world. how does this affect the situation in the country and how s... dmitry valerievich, hello,

hello, yuri, tell us what has changed in russian-argentine relations since javier meley came to power? well, javier miley came to power not so long ago, about 2 months ago, and to be honest , probably due to tectonic changes. nothing has happened in our bilateral relations yet, regular contacts are being carried out or planned at various levels, i will say that the presidents exchanged several messages, at the end of last year, at the beginning of this year, they related to new year's holidays, the issue of argentina's entry into brix. meley outlined his priorities, these are the usa, israel, russia, as if officially not listed in these priorities, meley often talks about what is needed. return argentina to the western camp , but at the same time, the new leadership of argentina

, of course, understands the importance of russia in the international arena and the importance of russia for itself, for argentina itself, therefore, at all levels of our communication, the argentines convey to us that they are ready to further develop relations, that there is no there will be no rollback previously signed documents will not be revised, that is, the whole complex of issues... we hope they will remain afloat and develop in a number of directions. probably, the new point is that, like no one before, meley

emphasizes economic issues: the country is in a difficult situation, needs money, and therefore any conversations with argentines today begin not with political issues, with the need to increase investments and develop trade and economic cooperation, this is perhaps new.

we have to wait another 2 years before any positive aspects appear: inflation exceeded 211% at the end of last year. according to this indicator, argentina came in second place in the world after lebanon and first place in latin america, overtaking venezuela. according to all other indicators, things are approximately the same, the devaluation of the national currency continues, real incomes of the population are falling, poverty has approached the terrible figure of 45%. that is , the situation is really very difficult, a lot is said about interaction with the imf, the fact that it is necessary to pay off debts to the fund, but in fact, the debt to external creditors in general is 10 times greater than the debt to the imf, the figure is more than 420 billion dollars, how to pay off debts and at the same time find money for development

is not clear, but the people seem to reacts to this - uh, i'll tell you, well, in different ways, on the one hand, meley has not yet lost uh, popular support, his ratings are still above 50%, but on the other hand, uh, people go out into the streets, and on january 24 the first general strike took place in argentina, when almost everything was closed, and miley became a kind of record holder, the first president who faced such a nationwide protest only 45 days after coming to power. in fact, argentina today is a large testing ground where the ideas of ultra-liberalism and libertarianism are being developed. meley spoke in davos at the world economic forum that the state is an enemy that hinders development, it should not interfere in the economy, this shock therapy, it is unknown whether it will give any results, from

our russian experience we can say, that in the early nineties we also went through similar experiments.

to be mutually beneficial, non-discriminatory, as long as the argentines tell us that they are ready for this, but understand that their market must be made attractive for foreign investment and demonstrate some kind of solvency, without this the development of relations in this area will be objectively difficult. well, i propose to continue the economic topic, including, you mentioned brix, argentina, apparently, refused to join the organization, but at the same time, the country's authorities say they are ready. cooperate, to what extent does this format suit moscow and other brix members, and in general, how can argentina be useful for brix and brix for argentina? well, you know , if you answer from the end, then probably the last question, who can be useful to whom, today it has moved completely into the realm of hypotheticals, because despite the interest shown in brix membership even during

the presidency of christina kirchner, and then this interest materials in different conversations, they believe that it is enough develop relations at the bilateral level, they do not see tangible financial and economic dividends that brix membership could bring them, at the same time they believe that there is a certain political context in the work of brix, in general , as a whole, no matter how much they seem to care about this, they they say that they will deal with

their economy, with finances, but brix will wait for now, are they ready to work in some? certain partnership formats with brix, well, probably the future will show, the shallows are actually now demonstrating a fair pragmatism, moving away from some of their election promises, making compromises with opponents in various areas, it is possible that the argentines, as time goes on, so to speak, will be able to look at the activities of brix from a slightly different angle and reassess their attitude towards this, but such a moment: has not yet arrived, well, as for bilateral relations with russia and such sharp corners, acute moments that may arise, at the end of last year there were reports that the argentine authorities are planning to transfer ukraine has two helicopters. mi-171 - tell me, is this information confirmed, firstly, and if so, is this some kind of one-time action or is buenos going

to provide assistance to kiev on some permanent and full-fledged basis? mi-171 are two russian military transport helicopters that were acquired by argentina in 2011, mainly before their antarctic operations, they have 13 temporary permanent bases in antarctica, so you have to get there somehow, but the machines have been you ever since ... their decommissioned resource needs major repairs, one machine has been dismantled, the second is inoperative , there were rumors that argentina could transfer these helicopters, but such information has not been confirmed to date, are these helicopters of any interest to our opponents? probably yes, from the point of view of spare parts, at least, but we firmly convey to argentina the idea that the previous government of fernandez firmly adhered to the principled position on the inadmissibility of the supply of weapons and military equipment to conflict zones, including ukraine, and we expect the same from the current

administration. in addition, hypothetical deliveries of these rotorcraft would be a violation of the end -user certificate, which prohibits the transfer of military equipment without the consent of the exporting country, that is, russia.

actions, which is absolutely unacceptable for russia, since it represents a set of certain steps, well, with which it is simply impossible to enter into peace negotiations, this is the surrender of russia, the payment of reparations, prosecution, the russian leadership for the organization of the northern military district, in general, with this idea of ​​​​the peace formula, zelensky, in general, is rushing around the world and offering it to latin america, but here i repeat, this is not really a topic. arouses some great interest, has a lot of its own problems, so zerlyandsky has not yet had much success in latin america with his initiatives. dmitry valerievich,

we know that argentina is one of the popular destinations among russians who want to live abroad, in connection with this , again, some time ago there were reports that the authorities allegedly make it difficult to obtain vng, there and other permits for russians to stay in argentina. tell me, did such a problem really exist? is it true and what is the embassy doing in this regard? well, in fact , there are not so many russians in argentina, except for the largest historical russian diaspora in latin america, which was formed by immigrants from tsarist russia from the middle of the 19th century until the present time, so to speak, that is, if we do not take refugees, so to speak, this is really a large diaspora living here, but the census population in 2022. in general, it showed that out of 46 million argentines, 2 million are only emigrants, less than 1% are russians, that is, well

, several thousand according to our estimates. the purpose of the visit is mainly maternity tourism , a lot was written about this in the media, in fact there was no problem with visas, because argentina and i do not have visas, and the problem was probably more that... the media they fanned this topic about russian refugees who filled argentina, who come to give birth to children, and began asking visitors at the borders, why are they going and how visa-free is mainly , as we understand, for tourist purposes, but the people leaving with big bellies began to lie to the border guards, so to speak, saying that they were coming from the salt of tourism, in fact they came with for medical purposes, many stayed afterwards

trying to somehow find work. here this caused irritation, that as if newcomers began to tell lies, then this wave began, but the refugees, the people who chose their own path, made their choice, uh, leaving russia in difficult times, uh, well , god be their judge, but for us, any russians are our russian people, our citizens, we must help them, like an embassy, ​​like a consulate, respectively, we are in front of the argentines, of course , they have always raised the question: that there should be no discrimination on the basis of nationality among those entering, but i will say frankly that this wave gradually, but very quickly, faded over the week, and as i said, the number of russians remaining here in argentina is extremely small, many have realized their goals, having given birth to children - or returned to homeland, or moved to other countries, uh, by the way, this also provoked the argentines a little, that they received passports

and immediately left the country, but the number... mainly with vandalism in relation to our objects, in relation to the temple of the russian orthodox church of moscow patriarchy , which were written off with offensive inscriptions, for example, in relation to the russian federation square, the nameplate was filled with paint, so to speak, but no matter how serious incidents there were then, they gradually disappeared altogether, we are in the argentine media paid attention to this directly. with

the authorities and told them that this was unacceptable, it all went away within a week. argentina as a whole is a fairly tolerant country , so migrants have always come here from all over the world; in general, there is no oppression here based on nationality, religion, or other grounds, so there are practically no such appeals. dmitry valerievich, i thank you for answering our questions, thank you for this interview. thanks a lot.

dear friends, i invite you to watch reruns of our original program. besagon tv, i hope you remember them and enjoy them.