just lie that this is not so, this is the whole ukrainian state ideology is based on this, their entire pseudo-history is based on this, and it seems to them that this is a good way, yes, so to speak, to deceive everyone, to build a nation on this, to build on this state, yes, you can say, you know, technologists like to say, you know, every nation is based on its own mythology, mythology , mythology is different, if your mythology does not fight with facts at all, if it is absolutely absurd, if it is internally conflicting, yes so to speak, and it only leads to self-destruction, it will destroy you, because instead of those simple three points that i said, what did they do? in the field of geopolitics of security, they decided that they would be a springboard for putting pressure on russia, from the point of view of the economy, so to speak, they decided that they would deceive russia, steal, and there they would create projects that would harm russia, from the point of view domestic policy, they quickly divided it into right and wrong ukrainians, while they chose as their heroes absolutely...

nobodies, absolute nobodies, psychopaths, sadists, losers, and so on and so forth, and thought that if they simply wrote that they were heroes and that they were successful, that would be enough to to develop a successful history, in fact , there are technologies at the top, there are some kind of political intrigues, so to speak, but there are much deeper layers that, so to speak , or higher ones, that you can’t deceive, that you can’t deceive with such things, you can get a short-term effect, for a long time necessarily it will come. to self-destruction or to such internal conflicts that will begin to shake this entire system, and we see how this happens? i even felt somehow sad, it’s a pity, now i’m cheerful, next time, well , this interview is another big blow, there was demonization of putin, that he was almost a dictator gone crazy in terrible physical shape, hiding from everyone, nothing , shows a man in brilliant physical shape, speaking calmly. with a sense of humor,

brilliant knowledge of the matter, it is clear that he can say johnson and scholz and so on, because putin removed them, he said what to talk to them about, who are they in general, and explained why they are, so after that every time they try to say something, it looks like, and you who, which of these leaders is able to remember and know the history of their side, since putin knows the history of russia, well , imagine scholz telling the history of germany, but what is there to tell?

so i would like to return to this very important topic in diplomacy there are two main concepts: diplomacy as a profession, diplomacy as one from the key areas of international relations with security and economics, so the fact that after vladimir vladimirovich’s interview with tucker carlson, the words diplomacy, negotiations returned to our vocabulary, it is very significant, in general, i will now try to give from...

first he brought his plan yes, in moscow, in the kremlin, in the foreign ministry, they read this five-point plan, laughed, returned it, threw it into the orna, wrote their own plan, which got the name:

it was possible to take it, but then the occupation regime was difficult to get out of it, everything would the georgians became angry with the russians and hate russia so much, but not everyone, and there would be georgians who would rule georgia and love russia, maybe three more short theses, then, of course, we

will not conduct any negotiations with ukraine in relation to it, to the end of the happiness of the conflict, the current military one, we will only talk about an ultimatum, it can be called whatever you like, but... now we need to think about what will be in this document, not actually in theses about where the front line becomes , although this is also very important, but also stories about the future the structure of that part of ukraine, which, and if of course it remains, that is, not negotiations, but an ultimatum, further, the fourth question is still more important, vich several times named the united states as a possible partner in the negotiations. regarding this conflict , i have no doubt that when the negotiations begin, as i already said, i generally think that they are already underway, we will return to the table with negotiations with the document of december 2021, of course it is a little overbearing, but in essence , this is a good starting point

to start negotiations, the west, keep in mind the stop of nato expansion to the east, the withdrawal of the infrastructure created there after the year ninety-seven. a broad discussion about eurasia, our relations with china, india, pakistan, iran, this is also a set of ties in the field of security that allows us, at a minimum, to begin to create a structure equal in weight to the osce, which in the future may be dominant in

the entire eurasian space , the last thing is regarding the special military operation, we have a heroic army, an excellent rear, well, regarding the foreign confrontation in the information sphere in the foreign information space, now this interview with vladimir putin is a signal to all of us , in fact, our diplomacy and our allies that we are back, and the main thoughts that we have, our model, our worldview regarding the future world order, we can and should present it there in enemy space, although of course the main thing is still our partners, in fact...

they test their ideas about strategy and tactics on this training ground, they they are perfectly using the russian threat

to solve their problems around the world, we cannot go to any negotiations, what kind of negotiations are these, our territory is occupied, now we tell our people: yes, by the way, before the presidential elections, and we are going to negotiations with america, this is to create such feelings here among patriots, that is , it turns out, that is, we have been fighting for 2 years, we are fighting for what, the supreme one? set the task and the supreme rock had an interview with the stacker karlstvo, it has not yet been implemented, there is no densification yet, we must clearly defend our interests, what can we do to secure belgorod? no, until we push back zakharkov deeply, we can secure crimea, no, we see how the americans are trying to manage our soft subordinates, and we are not going to look at this, so what kind of negotiations, no negotiations are close. it can’t be, not with anyone and about nothing. the only negotiations that will suit us are acts of surrender of nazi

ukraine, with all its minions. well, in my humble opinion. yes, well, i support this point of view, it seems to me that they are also like this there are no serious systemic negotiations going on. it seems to me that all these ideas that some kind of big deal is possible with the united states, this has generally been going on since the time of trump, early trump, as soon as he, so to speak, arrived there, enough. it quickly became clear, i hope that our diplomacy knows this, that it is not very clear who to talk to, but vladimir vladimirovich is talking with presidents, in general , i think that the conversation with trump, first of all, even with biden, was probably in some positive sense, but when it came to implementing at least some part of these agreements, it quickly became clear that the american political establishment is structured in such a way that it does not implement political decisions in the normal, usual sense of the word, moreover, as if i had long been behind this politician... i look, and i see that the biden administration is generally just a record holder for a split within itself, this is not a split with congress,

which can say no, although this is also important, it is not a split with the opposition republican party, within the administration itself, the right hand not only does not know what lev is doing, it opposes what lev is doing. by the way, regarding what sergei aleksandrovich said, he drew such a jesuitical diagram regarding the fact that they say - so to speak, well, they probably took scholz, yes, as they would definitely say. to mock him, to tie him up, to cover him up, well, under regan i ’m ready, so to speak, to say, yes, this could have happened, under clinton this could have happened, yes under bush sr. this could have happened, probably, i don’t know with the younger one. well, maybe, but under the current administration , in my opinion, only one blew up the nord stream, this is the anglo-saxon faction, in order to frame the other, that’s what most likely happened, in any case, more and more people seem to be talking about this, so when we we’re talking about what’s going on there, well , listen, which biden, which trump? i generally don’t know what will

happen there with the 20-24 problem, well, because in the normal sense, i think that there will be no elections after all.

they are going to do, and the most important thing is that their internal policy is a confrontation between these two americas, these are not republicans and democrats a long time ago, because they have been arguing for a long time and so on, these are two absolutely infected, yes, they culturally hate each other these two forces in america at the grassroots level, at the level of ordinary people, at the level of elites, they hate each other, they have no choice but to start a civil war there, but at the same time it is extremely viral from the point of view domestic foreign policy of power. well, for example, one cannot give up its islamists, the left wing of the democratic party, the so-called, this squat, well, it cannot, if they give up everything, all the policies that they have been building for years, all this rhetorical construction will collapse, others cannot refuse israel, so they hate it, bibi netanyahu, but they cannot refuse israel’s help, now the question is, how to talk to such people, well

, this is essentially the classic definition of paranoid schizophrenia, when a person understands that this, well, i don’t... that america is a global structure. the russian empire at one time invented a way not to interfere in this matter and at the same time respect its own great national interests. it was called armed.

your conflict is trying to draw us in from the point of view of your internal rightness, the wrongness of the two fighting centers, we do not participate in this, moreover, we do not participate armed, that is, we are ready to defend

national interests, we do not participate armed, we shoot just in case those who come with a request, we are simply armed; armed neutrality then meant approximately the following: armed protection of russian trade routes; in this case , here you can defend anything with armed force; here there will be no readiness. the whole of europe, moreover, was drawn in, so to speak, there were battles off the indian coast during that civil war, the spanish civil war, absolutely everyone was drawn in, the only thing is that

everyone was drawn into the civil war in russia, but not too much, any civil war on a large scale state draws in other states, but the united states is also a global system; by the way, in your educational system, people who were educated by american standards will be drawn in, just as they tried to drag people in. but i like this approach, we’ll protect you, for example, i’m not defending me, someone will try, hop, i’ll give it to him, say, you wrote a piece of paper, well, come here, and so right away,

in my opinion it’s great, but the fact that emissaries will come, that's absolutely certain, help, help us, of course, in moscow he will say that give it to him even this happened, for a year they demanded to stop, to stop, but from me personally, they demanded to stop campaigning against.

you really know this today when they say, okay, stop it, what are you stirring up, why is this, well, we don’t understand why we need a writing bayonet, even a bayonet from the news newspaper, whether it’s the democratic party, the republican party, or the wedge , because this is a global system, and why did they train us according to their own program, okay, then explain to me a much simpler thing, what is the point of the german media regularly show fragments of our programs, german is different, what’s different? the american media , which the program regularly shows, they just automatically what automatically, well , what difference does it make to them at all, that our program exists somewhere, because we...

welcome to asia, here the heart of the continent beats.

does she really read minds or not? premiere? anna ostrovskaya investigative committee. so. are you watching? well, girls. maybe this dream of mine is somehow connected with this matter. and do you know who the killer is? yes. just look. stand still, don’t move, for some reason i believe in you, anna is a medium, we’ve been watching before anyone else, in the app or on the website,

since time immemorial. in russia the law reigned, the people, princes, and governors chose together, this approach is a democratic election of authorities publicly, we keep to this day, filling out the ballot, choose traditionally only innovatively, progress helps us, improving the process, dec is truly a godsend, votes quickly, clearly, from a smartphone laptop, there are millions across russia, for people that there is a convenient solution to refugee, to call elections home, taking a portable box. there is a mobile voter, in a swinging way of life, a traveler freely, votes anywhere, so that we can comfortably make plans freely, we choose a candidate on a date convenient for us, at the polling station be calm, video control is arranged, in addition to the cameras at the polling station, like heroes from a fairy tale, observers they stand, they monitor the legality, in general, everything is technologically advanced, you can see it in person at the site.