well, what does this give, how many of them are now in the dock, well, how many are there in the middle east, about 40, about 30 of them are attacking, and about 40, and what do the americans answer to this, how do they object to this, what are they doing, they can bomb , he’s silent, they’re bombing, and how it helped, they would bomb and what would help them, what are they talking about, well, how is it perceived as a bad joke, but not the bases , the bases are still there, of course, only these bases are withdrawing, america can’t protect them?

the allies suffer, they themselves, of course, did not suffer, so what? so look at them what is the nature and growth now, absolutely inflationary in nature, this is pumping up the finances, what have they suffered, they are now collecting everything, industries that others have, they are now, american companies have their capital from the same china, and what they took out, how what was taken out, conclusion." but look, look carefully at what has appeared in america, jobs have appeared , they don’t have them, their number is decreasing, well , khazin explains it better than me, he talks about it every time, the number of working hours per week is being reduced there, this very a serious sign , wages are being reduced, it’s important, well, no, and this, by the way, is even worse, of course, in conditions, this is even worse, that is , labor productivity is decreasing, of course, this is understandable, europeans sell more .

we don’t see the underlying problems that exist, but the system, the system is still working, no , of course,

the europeans were promised a lot of something, especially recently, i don’t know, maybe they promised something else under reagan, well, in any case, they did it, because europe after all, she lived quite prosperously, fatter, always fatter than the americans, well, i mean the average european, but i’m not sure that they were promised some kind of resources in the east. you see, in the same place, if, why do you need to promise, if there are no sovereign states in europe, there are no leaders of sovereign states, what should you promise them, they need to be ordered, well, you can describe it as the comprador elite of occupied states, you can describe it simply, i mean i describe it as managers, there is a corporation,

you received an order - it came, you get a salary they pay - they pay, they pay a bonus annually, they pay a golden parachute , i'm sorry, it hasn't come to this yet, but in principle, probably, if you behave well, you've been told ,

it's obvious that this president doesn't make any decisions, well, he doesn't , here andrei anatolyevich is right, who makes the decision? can i ask a question? well, everyone understands perfectly well that once again, you can guess, this decision was probably made by blinkin, this is the salevan, who is this? who is behind, so to speak, zahiks, who is now the deputy secretary of defense, last time when lloyd austin got sick, they told her, don’t come back from vacation, she says, well, i’m formal, it’s formal. here the guys are deciding who told them, you see , that is, this is the situation, the situation is precisely that no one knows who is managing this whole matter, because well, by the way, we are now entering the pre-election period a period when it was well

written in usa today that this is america, usa today, an agency that has always acted from pro-washington liberal positions. this is america 2024. an elderly man with a failing memory and an elderly man facing criminal charges are fighting for the title of leader of the free world. how did this even become our reality? question mark. that is, everyone understands this now. in each, so to speak, in each newscast, one way or another, there are journalists. it’s not fox news that asks questions, it’s the whole range of journalists who ask this question. listen, what will happen to biden when you remove him? why do we have a sick person in charge?

well, i told you that a young blooming one came, well, by the way, it was an ordinary career, they came as an intern to the vice-president’s office, worked for almost pennies, but such cases happened there, this is how they made a career in washington, now of course everything is different there, but now for this you have to be a lesbian, but she has both, i will say that the situation in this regard is all good for her, yes, everything is absolutely fine for her, she is a representative of all possible minorities, yes, yes. exactly, so, the situation is not that biden is, so to speak, bad, maybe, sort of

personally there on joseph mineta biden jr., although he, of course, is a war criminal with experience, starting in yugoslavia, but maybe there would be no need to mock him, after all, he has a lot of personal tragedies there, but listen, when the authorities in washington in a nuclear superpower tell you everything is in order, a cognitive test, so that you know, we will not conduct it with this president, then it becomes scary, this is...

don’t formulate such a strategy, that means it’s an open check, that means we he shouldn't be owed for it vote. senator lee still, i’ll quote: about the ukrainians, they are not choir boys, not boy scouts, not girl scouts, they are world record holders for corruption, there this is an art form, which means that before in the united states senate it was not heard at all, about this tucker carlson spoke there, he could have said about it, laura inrom could have said it there, someone else in the bradboard publication, now they are talking about it in the united states senate, that’s not why. that their eyes were opened to ukrainian corruption, lord, they supply the corrupt guys with from the very times when they began their expansion.

the problem is that they do not believe that the country is run by sane people. i think that even the united states senators today do not know who exactly runs the united states. this is the main problem, which means what should a responsible world community do in this situation, well , that’s what we will do, that everything is fine there, there is a limited contingent of troops, do you understand what’s the matter? look, vladimir always says: here is sarmat, here is poseidon, are you sure that there is someone there who is afraid of sarmat poseidon? but we don’t need them to be scared? no, wait, well, let’s at least scare them before a nuclear war. the point is that when we say that we have nuclear weapons, we will absolutely use them, who will understand this now? we are sure that there are people there who understand this, that there are people there who make political decisions.

world war, when we say that we are dying in it, this is the formulation of the question, we will definitely be dying, because besides the idiots in washington there is still half the world, and of course, but only this half of the world should understand that there are no people in washington who are capable of being afraid of this, well , write letters, but what does it mean, you should understand , well, just a second, look, okay, let’s miss the unafraid idiots, but that’s not the point unafraid idiots, well, okay, let's miss the unafraid idiots, the whole world is in ruins, everything is fine.

this is who this is someone china, everyone else who understands this, well, we’ll sit down now and say, of course, it’s true, it’s like with leadership, you know, and we lead a limited contingent doctors on site. as if it were a logical link that in general it is not necessary to recognize the results of the elections in the united states, this is mild, at least, in any case, because we do not see the opacity of the procedures, nothing is happening there at all, this is correct, this is the first thing , yes, and secondly, the fact that the world is now in danger not

because they are imperialists, warmongers, but because they do not have government, is wonderful. this is at the state level, so of course it is necessary to appeal to the states, because in the states there are the latter, there are reasonable people who a have powers because they are directly elected, b who are responsible to a fairly large extent for the life of the united states, each in their own state, so i believe that you need to contact them directly, you need

it’s easy to understand that there is nothing to talk about in washington, but it’s quite possible to talk to each specific state. establish diplomatic relations and says that listen, guys, well, excuse me, this is a problem, let’s look at our relationship let’s establish, no, it’s clear that this will immediately cause, so to speak, a terrible rebuke on their part, the problem is that they never posed the question this way, they always posed the question this way, but we must pose it, they always posed it this way, in your country something wrong is happening, let us intervene, you are violating human rights, we must hold a symposium of the liberated states in our country.

what to do? this is our mission. ask. well, it’s very interesting, so to speak, we are analyzing different aspects of the policies of the united states. i absolutely agree that of course we we are witnessing a deep crisis, a crisis of governance, a crisis that covers a significant part of the political system. but at the same time, i would urge, well , to look more carefully, because if we analyze american, for example, foreign policy in europe, in the middle east, it is necessary.

korea, japan, the united states, now they are developing another triangle, the united states, japan, the philippines, you see, that is , there we can observe a certain, so to speak, policy, quite meaningful, enough, so to speak, clearly oriented, relying on quite significant armed forces, there are all aircraft carriers, because somewhere by april there is yes... that in the western part of the pacific ocean there will be three or four american aircraft carriers going there, that is, you understand , here we can observe a slightly different picture, apparently this is just some other area and other people are actually pursuing this policy. the next moment i want to say that we are really in such a situation of a certain confusion and a certain chaos that naturally arise

different points of view, different positions arise, you just said that for the first time people spoke there in the senate. recently, it was difficult to imagine that such a corporation had been working there for a long time, the pentagon, and so on , by the way, they came here in the nineties and tried to find our

specialists who knew north korea, they were interested in this in the early nineties years ago, that is, such a large, serious corporation, this idea speaks of something completely different, that’s not what we heard now from these senators who said on a piece of paper, we need to push, we need to push. it is necessary, so to speak, to destroy russia, but about something completely different, and where are they talking, or even this englishwoman says that the war in ukraine is beneficial for us, they say something completely different , that the war in ukraine is absolutely unprofitable, the united states, what is necessary it’s faster to finish it, it says three main theses, that first, that ukraine will lose new territories, second, that a clash with nato is possible, and third, and most importantly, there is a process of rapprochement with china, and that china can turn into a very important assistant to russia. and that if it goes on like this, then this process will become practically uncontrollable, moreover, it even says that after the settlement of this conflict, the united states

must quickly begin to lift sanctions, what ’s the matter, that’s why all this appears, and what, so to speak, is reminiscent of all this events, i think this event really reminds of this transition, like a certain tram moves from one reality to another, from plan a to plan b, because plan a... the destruction of russia, but this is already clear, yes, it is unrealistic, apparently a significant part of sensible people there understand all this, but on the other hand there is plan b, plan b - this is a tricky game in a triangle: russia, china, the united states, a game that the americans at one time very actively used in order to cause, constantly cause mistrust in relations between us and china, that is, they are trying to undermine this process, which develops by returning to this... system, when every time some american emissary comes to us, they start to get nervous in china, when someone comes to china, that is, they begin to create this certain atmosphere

that should create this mistrust in our relations, this is a very important point, especially since there is also north korea, that is, we perfectly see the success of this course of turning to the east, they see perfectly well, well, i won’t say all our successes in relations with china , but in a relationship. north korea, they they see very well that a certain common interest is increasingly being formed, which can become the foundation for the formation of a very serious informal, but really big , important union that will play a huge role in the international arena, now it seems to me, under the guise of all these now reports and so on, let 's go back with russia, let's make something funny now, there's no need, so to speak, to watch them further, how the process of rapprochement will take place, let's somehow... well let’s deceive them, or i don’t know, we’ll promise something, or let’s do something so that this process, which we ’ve been talking about all the time, of putting together this very dangerous

block for american dominance in the world, so that it’s just stop, stop as cheaply as possible, as simply as possible, so i believe that we must really look at these things and really understand that there is, and still is, a tendency to try to crush us, attempts, so to speak, to re... transfer weapons, attempts to prolong this whole war, but, but there is another tendency, which suggests that we will have to act much smarter, much more cunningly , we need to deceive them, we need to promise them something, we need to do something in order to prevent the formation of such a strong, very dangerous for their coalition power, and i think we just need to really understand what this is all about and where this all leads. mikhail mikhailovich. at present , a very large-scale period of various kinds of personnel changes has begun in the armed forces of ukraine, without any exaggeration

to say that the supporters of ex-commander-in-chief valery zaluzhny, his nominees, are currently vacating their positions, and in their place are already being replaced by the nominees of the new commander-in-chief, alexander syrsky, as well as representatives of other leaders there. both in the military department and in other political structures, this personnel whirlwind, it will probably even reach the level of platoon commanders, when all the personnel chains are extended, so this process of appointing reassignment is still only by and large, it has started, of course , the president of ukraine vladimir zelensky expects success in victories from what he calls the new management team in the military department. but what seems to me not quite obvious here is when they tell me, you don’t tell the ukrainians how to do this or that, but

somehow i’m calm about it, why? because , after all, the military-political leadership in kiev is distinguished by a rare stubbornness, this is what they have already got into their heads, but it is practically impossible to turn them off this path, here i am i mean the leadership that is now at the helm of both the state and the armed forces, so we can talk about these things quite boldly, this stubbornness will destroy them sooner or later, here is the inflexibility, the lack of somehow reacting to completely obvious things -

the headquarters, it invites the chief of the general staff, the chief of the main operations directorate, together they develop some proposals for the upcoming campaign together, the general staff there analyzes the intelligence situation, data, and how he can do it analyze, if in the structure of the general staff there is no main intelligence directorate, it is subordinate to the ministry of defense of ukraine, in general, this structure for me, well, except for surprise, that... does not cause anything, or, for example, in the structure of the general staff, if i’m not mistaken, they don’t have a main organizational and mobilization department that would be involved in preparing the necessary reserves, and again there are no intelligence agencies in the structure of the general staff, and in general this is how all this is, all this should happen in such a way that, for example , there is no need for him, president zelensky, to have any visits from numerous military delegations there,

only two people came, the chief... of the general staff, the chief of the main operational directorate, they together developed some proposals for the upcoming company, it is impossible to develop a realistic plan for 2024, why? because, firstly, it is planned only for a company, for a specific one, only the first some operations are being developed in the most detail, because how will the second ones turn out - this is still a big question, but of course the forces and means must be assigned to the entire company, all reserves, all material reserves, ammunition, guided missiles. regrouping there, everything else, how can this be done if the supply of military equipment from the west is a big question, and, strictly speaking, there are no other supplies, well, how can you even plan something for the company, but nevertheless from the new leadership is expected to succeed, in this regard they, of course, would not want to start with some, well, let’s say, painful defeats by the newly appointed chief

, and yet... they also appointed the commander-in-chief , the chief of the general staff, they generally have a lot of invented positions there, just a lot of some kind of forces that they don’t have there, all this will sooner or later only lead to one, that the conflict, the conflict, again the one that was similar to the president of ukraine and vladimir, it is systemic, does not depend on the individual, it does not depend on the individual, it will arise again, why, because the management structure. many different types have been thought out transmission links, if the nato structure has the same management system as in ukraine, or this is a ukrainian invention, it is not managed that way, the fact is that again - here it is necessary, they basically take some western models, from them , for example, until very recently , until 2021, the chief of the general staff, he was the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine, well, some kind of nonsense by and large

and... and sometimes it’s just that the structures created by him are very difficult to compare or with nato or with the same ones, is it something of their own ukrainian , yes, yes, they brought into us, the worst thing is when you carry some samples beyond avdiivka , will they butt heads, or does syrsky still have carte blanche and can withdraw troops from there? you see, in my opinion, in my opinion, all the last reserves of the armed forces of ukraine that are available in this area will be used in the battles for avdiivka. that's today. gave his first interview, which by the way is also very strange, again to foreign media, and he states there that they will go on the defensive, which means he gave the german publication cdf, in the fourteenth year i understood that the war between ukraine and the russian federation would be long, everything was based on the fact that we must end the war by reaching our borders, our western borders will reach our own, that is, when they flee to poland is not considering other options, because we simply have no other way out, the war is changing from technological progress to new ones.