dismissed from office, although on the other hand he was also good, he attached the gpk at stalin’s parties, having come to power, he debunked stalin at the twentieth congress, branding him for repressions, in which, by the way, he himself took part, thereby knocking out the ground from under the feet of millions of people who fought the great patriotic war with the name of stalin on their lips. well, it was so, it’s true , in addition, in order to gain weight and importance in the eyes of their fellow tribesmen, that is, immigrants from ukraine, of whom there are a lot was in the government, he rehabilitated a huge number of bandera supporters and collaborators who took part in monstrous, absolutely repressive measures...

the example of the legendary pilot, test pilot, amazing person, valery chkalov, recently celebrated his 120th birthday in nizhny novgorod, where there is a monument to him, which for the first time in the history of mankind , he made a non-stop flight from moscow to vancouver via the north pole, where he was received in the united states as a real hero, just as an astronaut was received many years later.

i know that it is impossible to do without this, and i see from again, from history there, if we take japan, if we take germany, yes, that if this regime cannot be destroyed otherwise, by the way i’m not saying that it will ukraine must do it, yes, if there is a civil war in russia, this will also have to be done, if we have to shoot at the kremlin, at all our favorite buildings there, i of course prefer that the fucking of the lubyanka ends with that, right? but let's say, okay,

let's say, i mean, of course, that first of all, it is necessary, it is necessary to destroy these decision-making centers, yes, everything else, there are peaceful people there and so on, i will feel very sorry for them, but for some kind of normalization of the processes in their heads, it doesn’t hurt muscovites to hear the air raid siren, where did that come from? realized? hatred, and it seems to me that one way or another, we are still running into precisely those very years, the nineties, the eighties, when our education began to allow these gaps through which it was possible to receive exactly this charge. dislike and disrespect for one's

country, for example, state duma deputy yana lantratova says the following: i want to draw attention to the all-russian olympiad for schoolchildren. one of the important goals of the all-russian olympics is to search for talented children who in the future can become the intellectual support of our society. however, the concern is the semantic content. in humanitarian subjects, especially social studies. in fact, to successfully complete assignments for the olympics and social studies, schoolchildren only need to study the classics of western and european thought, but the priceless treasury of russian thought is often left behind. in the process of preparation, our talented, smart guys, as a rule, come across popular, promoted, western thinkers, which is certainly important, but as a result. they know about the works of spendler

and toenby much more than about the legacy of nikolai yakovlevich danilevsky or konstantin nikolaevich leontyev, then a lie is formed in the minds of young people. the image of the secondary nature of russian thought, of some kind of catching up development, i believe that we can talk about education there is no patriotism of historical memory among us, our intellectually gifted youth, in such conditions. here is an analysis of the texts from the olympiads of the twenty-second and twenty- third years in social studies, which deputy lantratova is talking about. in the first round , exclusively works by western european authors were used. arthur schuppenhaur, schummacher, sorokin, who was recognized as srubezh, there was no place on this list, at the olympics the highest standard, in the tenth grade,

students, listen to this, had to complete an assignment based on the text of the american philosopher martybau. no theme is developed more deeply in staicism than the harm done to the political life of a group by factionalism and local loyalties; political discussion, they argue, is constantly frustrated by fanatical loyalties. in our circus propa, in quotes, or nations , only by connecting ourselves with the world community of justice and reason, we will be able to avoid these dangers, that is, it turns out that

the world community of justice and reason, of whom it consists, does not consist of nations, not from peoples, not from the history of peoples, not from the culture of peoples, not from... no, this is some kind of sterile something, divorced from everything that connects a person with dad, with mom, with grandfather, with great-grandfather, with great-great-grandfather , with the history of the country, with the geography of the country, and so on, it’s amazing, but isn’t reason and justice derived from the historical development of humanity, from the historical development of cultures and peoples. isn’t this derivative, that is, in order, just think about it, in order to become a fair, happy, reasonable being, you have to give up everything that made you who you became, who you were born, who

you were raised by, amazing, this isn’t genocide, global, isn’t it? and this work by martenusbaun is the basis for reflection and discussion of our best students at the olympics, how the attention of our young compatriots is laid and focused on an absolutely globalistic, destructive, harmful idea.

i'm sorry, you will never see it either at oxford or at harvard, and look how it fosters dependence, namely dependence, remember, i want to remind you, as a postscript to our program, the devil is in the details of the twenty-first year, do you want me to tell you how the russian higher education system is being held by the hands. a round table was held from london in the public chamber, at which representatives of the leadership of the country's leading universities openly declared that they were under external control, bypassing the ministry of science and higher education. the round table participants noted that

it is the humanitarian sector that suffers the most from this. faculties and departments. the scheme is simple and reliable. to grow in ratings. it is necessary that university teachers regularly publish in scientific journals from a certain list, if there are no special problems with this in the technical sciences, 2 + 2 - 4, then serious problems begin with the humanities, authors need to comply with certain ethical standards, this is a special view of history, and tolerance in matters of gender and land politics and much, much more. no publication, no career in university, if you want to publish, write about gender issues and about what a terrible country. russia in scientific language, of course, here is another letter,

the author asked not to give his name and not to name the university in which he works, i can understand him, but i want to read it, listen, regarding the deprivation of title for teachers and scientists from publishing articles in foreign countries publications, scopus and voz, now, in fact, the same obligation has been introduced. but it works cunningly, namely, you may not publish there, but the ratings, and therefore the awards, will be significantly lower or there will be none at all, as they say, watch your hands, a teacher or a group of teachers publish their ideas in foreign journals, they do it exclusively for money, they themselves pay the journal up to 253.

pays the teacher a bonus, most of the bonuses are money received by the university from the state budget, since the number of such rubles per article , then the state university’s articles depend on both the ratings of the university itself and its funding from the state, that is, to the west to our enemies. ideas and our budget money are leaking away, how do you like this scheme? why does another country exist? medals? remember, in our besogons we talked about cognitive warriors, about the fight against these wars, about propaganda, about what happened in sevastopol at moscow state university, thank god, now at the level of the federation council they have returned to this issue, it’s no secret that today everything more often... they say that the collective west has launched a hybrid war against the russian federation and

modern information warfare is one of the most dangerous components of a modern hybrid war. the purpose of the information war is completely identical the purpose of traditional war is to ensure the military defeat of the enemy. the slide there presents technologies like tsrumi6 today. create agent networks, including sleeper cells and those networks where agents are specifically introduced to settle in the territory; from recent practice, there was a case when they announced an open competition for two to fill two vacancies in the mi-6 apparatus, and so, accordingly, for those who is ready to participate in the competition, they were required to submit a detailed questionnaire, the results of checks, information there about me. and a lot of people responded to this offer, passed these

checks, established initial contact with him, and then said that, well, unfortunately, you didn’t get these positions, but we wouldn’t want to lose contact with you, we would like to be friends with you, and thus people, having passed this interview, returned back to their countries and regions, in fact already operational contacts of m6 intelligence. and even at the level of the chairman of the federation council , valentin ivanov matvienko , words were voiced about the need to create such a real serious, opposing cognitive front. listen. andrey, first of all, thank you for responding to our invitation, but there will be consequences from this invitation. i propose to simply instruct the defense committee and the education committee to consider it. the proposal made to create a state personnel training system, in the area

that we are talking about now, to look at what we already have, what we need, we are lagging behind, yes, we are lagging behind, the fact that the information struggle has been launched will will continue, will grow, will not go anywhere, that’s for sure, in order to effectively, professionally counteract it, work...

and we continue this struggle for what is needed or not needed, thank god that it has now finally become clear that we cannot do without it , we must defend ourselves, moreover, we must defend ourselves by attacking, and we need to be able to do this,

and we need to learn this, in order to determine the enemy... the narrative, as they say, doesn’t need much, for example, a story with a wonderful actor, my very good friend, who filmed in russia for the first time in my film, sunstroke by a serb, milos bikovic, who became a star of our cinema, who was approved for a role in an american series by the very powerful hbo, the series was called white lotus after...

meaning, it is an enemy narrative, no, well, not everything is so bad, there in the civilized world there are really talented, smart and sighted people, so i want to give you the words of the french historian, anthropologist emmanuel todd. by the way, in 1976 he predicted the collapse of the soviet union in 1976. here. he writes: i perfectly understand the shock, which causes the outbreak of large-scale hostilities. yes, russia entered the battle then, but you can enter the battle when it is already underway. i understand that people only see that first day of russia's active entry into hostilities, since the sudden surge

of military violence with its dramatic images blinds us to the overall dynamics of the two. rival systems, real instability at the heart of the western system, when the demographer sees that the population of russia is scarcely larger than that of the japanese, he cannot succumb to the general madness and chatter about some kind of expansion, the area of ​​this country is 17 million square kilometers, how can the russians want to expand their territory, and what did they bring?

a huge number of their people , their fellow citizens, repeat the words like a mantra, when russia defeats ukraine, it will attack europe, and no one has any idea why, what we don’t have, what we have in europe, why do we need this war with europe, well, it’s a simple question, i’m going. yes, and i’m bombing this because i need this, and what do i need in poland, what do i need in belgium, i what is needed in england, what we don’t have, what... what is there somewhere, why do we need it? this question is not raised at all. the cognitive war with the desire to convince the world that russia is an aggressor, it is going on inside our

country, is in full swing. here is an example, there is such a project: the way home, as if uniting the wives of mobilized soldiers who want them to return home as soon as possible. look, the leader of the group is on his way home, maria andreeva, waiting... svvo, who really serves us as a nurse, although he does not participate in active hostilities accepts. right after the protest, she goes home to a certain nikita odishchev. i don’t have any dark thoughts, why, how, what kind of personal relationships, this is absolutely not what we’re talking about. the simple fact is that nikita odishchev, he is an oppositionist, navalnist, he appeared in the smart voting project. worked in organizations as agents and donated to these structures, it turns out that nikita odische , to some extent, oversees the work of these groups,

including this movement, the way home, we understand perfectly well, we have already dealt with the organization of mothers, we have already detailed we studied how it works and how we can direct the activities of these women specifically to the party.

868 years ago, he said: to demand the truth, leaving untouched all those conditions that give rise to lies, means to demand that

there is no dirt on an unpaved street when it rains, wonderfully accurate words, this is so relevant today, so we demand today truth from the civilized world, which... is entirely, almost entirely built on a total lie, meaningless, this truth must be conquered, in fact, what we we are doing, we are conquering the truth, and not only for ourselves, it is true for everyone, i recently gave an interview, the tas and the liberal public, of course, branded me for... my words related to the definition of the fifth column, that’s what i said: i think that it will all end when the fifth column in russia is revealed and neutralized.

the point here is not about blaming someone, but about the fact that the sabotage that exists and the subversive work that is being carried out within the country, such as what happened in dagestan, is a sweep at the airport or in bashkiria, where they are hitting the most painful points, they are trying to oppose the national interests of the country, and this is very simple, and this is very clear, this does not mean that you cannot have your own

opinion. this does not mean that we should all walk to the line, dress in the same clothes, march and give, this is not what we are talking about, this is about the fact that in one way or another they are trying to destroy the foundations that cement the nation, country, state, people, in the end, this may sound pretentious, but this, in my opinion, is so, well... of course, it started here, so to say, the expected shit-thrower, for example, someone, anatoly nesmeyan, responding to me writes: “exterminate them from them, others will immediately appear who will be ordered to be called enemies of the state.” the fifth column is not a goal, it is a process. the fifth column is the justification for terror and nothing more, what kind of terror, what kind of terror, what type of terror are you talking about, anatoly,

someone? walls have been erected, or terror is something that is excommunicated from the state trough, i think, for the duration of the participants in a naked party, or something that is leading a trial of a murderer, a terrorist, or awarding someone a title on an agent, by the way, copied from american laws, what kind of terror if the deputy director of the yeltsin center for scientific affairs, mr. nikita sokolov... is recognized as a foreign agent on the eighth attempt, on the eighth, despite the fact that he could have been recognized as a foreign agent on the first attempt and long ago, we showed it in our besogons, listen, not rehabilitated - for the most part, almost never, those people who really fought against the soviet regime, and these are the dissidents of the forties, the dissidents of the thirties, who were

indeed... and eight times after that this powerful lobby dissuades him from the possibility of being recognized as a foreign agent, this only happened for the eighth time, you can imagine what power this is, you can imagine what influence this has, i still can’t help but draw your attention, listen to a few quotes from his network: the outbreak of russia’s war against ukraine is a disgrace.

“we don’t believe that the ukrainian people are under the rule of the nazis and need to be liberated, these people who signed such a petition, aren’t they they saw torchlight processions , they didn’t see the executions of our prisoners, and they didn’t see chevrons, they didn’t see the azov men zicking, they didn’t see swastikas, tattoos, fascist ones, they didn’t see this, but how to treat the words of a woman, that’s what she says : the fewer civilians in ukraine die at the hands of the russians, the less foreign media will write about us, the less citizens of other countries will know, the less help will be available, that is, well, the person writes, but the person thinks so and he writes, which means , this means he is calling on russia...

kill civilians as much as possible, as they do, in order to write more about them and in order to receive military, financial assistance, and so on and so forth, when russia does not do this, they do it themselves, and give it away for russian aggression, and why can’t we assume that it was precisely for these reasons that an american missile shot down a patriot of the ukrainian junta, an il-76 plane with ukrainian... captives who were being taken for exchange, why? why doesn’t anyone want to understand this, and why to the question, which journalists ask the american press secretaries of one or another organization, they answer that they have no reliable ones, why? we simply don't have enough information to comment on this plane crash, we saw a report about it.