current reality. europe is on the warpath. emmanuel macron promises to send troops to ukraine, but eu partners pretend that such an issue is not on the agenda . is europe ready for confrontation? they also decided to test artificial intelligence for humanity in a political confrontation and found out that the computer suggests not to hesitate in any incomprehensible situation and launches a nuclear strike. but that's all for now. just a game, but how all this can turn out, about this and not only in the international review program, right away after a short commercial. deposit - the best interest rate in savings - is an easy way to profitably invest money online. just one button, the investment in your child’s future has already been made, one button. savings grow with the maximum

rate, one button, and you look forward with confidence, together, open a deposit with the best interest rate with a maximum rate of up to 16% per annum in sberbank, saving with prime is more profitable, what men are silent about, painful urination, problems with erection, this symptoms of prostatitis, langidase promotes the breakdown of fibrous tissue and helps eliminate the consequences of prostatitis, langidase.

talents in the renovated cultural center, a sign of russia's national project is easy to miss, but it is impossible not to notice the changes that it brought to our lives. national project of russia by decision of the president. where else can you turn dance into a world heritage? spot into an invincible machine, knowledge into a calling. technologies in live communication. tradition in innovation is only here, in the country on which the sun never sets. tinkov, 40 million clients in the largest country in the world. open on financial services first deposit with a rate of up to 18.5% for 3 or 6 months. download the financial services application. financial services from the moscow exchange, deposits from different banks in one application. one of my friends asks me to give her snowdrops.

i give, these are the prices for flowers now, it’s cheaper to buy a smartphone, mega discounts up to 50% , smartphones with communication, only in a megaphone, this is a corporate party for hangovers, enterum, a new generation entersorbent removes toxins while preserving useful substances, a smart solution against poisoning, when you give russian tickets lotto maybe it turns out that they gave you a shopping trip worth a million or even a hundred. every second ticket wins one poodle, buy on the website in stoloto branded stores, the petrovs have holidays ahead, valentine's day for repairs, putty day and international wallpapering day, don't limit yourself, a cash loan from post bank with a comfortable payment from 1.00 rubles is enough for what you need and what you want, come in for money, post office bank. xelen helps relieve nasal congestion, now in a large family.

expert in liver cleansing and restoration, pay as conveniently as possible with alpha pay with any smartphone and receive a superkick every month, it’s not just profitable, alpha is profitable.

hello, international review is on air, in the studio fyodor lukyanov. today on the international review program. event of the week. europe is on the warpath, but this is still not certain. decisive artificial intelligence. in an unclear situation, launch rockets. materials of our program. european farmers went on a rampage, tire fires and brawls. report from the scene.

french troops land near vietnamese settlement of den ben phu. exactly 70 years ago, in march 1954, the battle began there. the result of which predetermined the withdrawal of france from indo-china and the independence of vietnam. actually, paris was ready for negotiations with the vietnamese communists, but hoped to strengthen its negotiating position with military success. it turned out the other way around. in may, the french garrison capitulated. in july, the geneva agreements were signed, ending the war on vietnamese terms. the decline of the french colonial empire began.

it is required that russia cannot win, it was said after an international conference in paris to support ukraine. over the next 3 days, the allies took turns dissociating themselves from the french president; there are no such plans and there will not be any. the germans disowned themselves several times, scholz three times. berlin is especially angry with paris. the germans allocated almost 10 times more to ukraine than the french. and france accuses them of indecisiveness, yes. and so he sets it up. burkhart mohr and his drawing is a risky game. the controversial german artist depicted emmanuel macron in as a troubodourist who caused a stir in europe with his statements. vimar fuentos from

the island of cuba, macron and his promise to send troops to ukraine. the image of the bear is completely traditional. in the background, in the corner, are the president’s european colleagues. union, apparently, is at a loss. from the section, we warned rutis daukantas with a drawing from 2019, which was published in a politician’s magazine. here is angela merkel on the right, emmanuel macron on the left, the image of russia is perfectly recognizable. another cartoon from baltic states, gatya s sluka from latvia reveals the topic of helping ukraine on the battlefield. ammunition from the west. it's written on many boxes.

to remind you that ukraine is important, we will not surrender ukraine, and as for macron personally , there is probably another subconscious reason, but to atone for the guilt before ukraine, before the pro-ukrainian public in france, for the fact that he has long advocated dialogue with russia, there is still a moment of improvisation, and this must be understood, it is in macron’s style to make it bright for the sake of a catchphrase. so to speak, a statement that the whole world will be discussing, the world is really discussing , wondering, maybe at least the french liked it, in france the first reaction is mostly negative, not to say very negative, people realized that

they realized that the debate about ukraine is changing here, what has happened in the last 2 years, people in general... well, two-thirds of the french population rejects the idea of ​​sending troops to ukraine, well , approximately 75% 76. the second survey shows that 82% of the french are against such an idea. can the french, especially the military, imagine imagine a war with russia? no, i can't even imagine. the french president's statement is baseless. the main thing that is shocking is

the fact that the war in ukraine is lost. and for some reason the idea is spreading that russia is going to attack europe further, to capture berlin, paris or rome. but it is russia that is reacting to the threat from nato. the situation in cuba is repeated in 1962, when america did not accept the deployment of missiles there. ukraine is cuba today, russia’s task is to get rid of the danger in its neighborhood. the top brass is counting otherwise. the head of government, jacques hautal , repeated the president word for word, to prevent russia from winning at any cost. and former prime minister manuel valls clarified, even despite the risk of world war iii. macron himself insists that he spoke of sound mind and good memory. the old guard, well-mannered.

determined to win, but her agenda is broader, her own affairs are more important. the old world realizes that it may have to rely on itself, but what is there to rely on? the french army is absolutely not ready for war. 30 years ago we began to reduce the army, cut the budget and efficient spending, reduced weapons, curtailed logistics. it was wrong, but we are just starting to get better. return to structure. cannot make

independent decisions, only those that america proposes, but in terms of the quality of military generals, we are one of the leading armies in the world. hence there are two paths: to peace, through recognition of mutual interests and negotiations, or to war, through accelerated capacity building. example, by curtailing social benefits in favor of security needs, which has already been called for by the danish prime minister, matte fredrickson. conceding something to russia and discussing a new european balance is out of the question. it is surprising, of course, that it is france that is at the forefront of escalation, but history is capricious. on the day when macron did not rule out nato participation in the ukrainian conflict, as...

naval targets at a distance of over 500 km. they can be launched from a variety of platforms, land, sea and airborne. the main carrier is the f-16 fighter. the length of the rocket is 5 m, the launch weight is more than a ton. it is equipped with a small turbojet engine and traction. the main part of the flight takes place at low altitude, which makes it difficult for air defense systems to detect it early. the warhead has two charges. first. penetrates concrete fastenings, the second hits the target. warhead weight - 480 kg. when installing a multi-mode

fuse, the missile can be detonated both upon contact with the target and inside it. it is believed that the german air force has about 600 such combat missiles, an analogue of the taurus, these are the british-french storm shadow missiles, which have already been delivered to ukraine. in nato armies they can be carried by f-16s and tornados. once launched, it cannot be controlled, commanded to self-destruct, or modified in the target's information. all data about it, as about air defense, is laid down earlier. the missile flies, guided by the gps system, and only before impact, it gains altitude and then dives towards the target. scholz terribly angered

his partners. he referred to the fact that the missiles that are being supplied. their specialists are directing, in general they handed over the allies, but the germans say they can’t send their personnel, they can give everything to themselves, especially since the ukrainians will pull out products received from bundesweir. schulz and his social democratic fellow party members understand that the historical trail forces germany to be more careful than others. other german parties.

on the one hand, it was signed by the winners of world war ii, the ussr, great britain, france and the usa, who renounced their rights in relation to germany, and on the other, by the federal republic of germany and the gdr. the 2+4 treaty, in essence, documented the birth hour of a sovereign united germany, defining its status, borders, membership in foreign policy blocs and the size of its armed forces. paris and moscow. their outcome remained in doubt until the last moment. initially, the parties considered the 4+2 option. the winners of world war ii work out the terms for the unification of western and eastern germany, and the german states simply

accept their decision. great britain and france took such a tough position. british. the united states and the soviet union were inclined to the 2+4 option, which provided that the two germany themselves would discuss the unification scheme. the final text included 10 points. the first two are about borders and the renunciation of territorial claims to others states. the following is about the reduction of the bundeswehr from half a million to 370 thousand people, the withdrawal of soviet troops by the end of 94 and the final liquidation of the occupation institutions of the victorious powers. in addition, the agreement emphasized berlin’s complete sovereignty over internal and external affairs and germany’s refusal to fight with anyone or produce nuclear,

biological and chemical weapons. for americans, traditionally for the british , german-russian rapprochement has always been seen as a challenge, a threat, as an encroachment on the role of historical britain, then the united states of america, so this link was destroyed, literally physically destroyed, if we talk about the symbolism of the destruction of the northern one. flow, now germany is separated from russia, cut off from russia, now deindustrializing, will this germany play the role of, well, if you like, such an engine of europe, which must take on more responsibility, a greater burden, confrontation with russia, that’s what we’re talking about now

this is how i see the german question. article two of the 2+4 agreement declared: the government of the two german states, the german democratic republic, guarantees that only peace will come from german soil, and that the united germany will never use the weapons at its disposal except in accordance with its constitution and the charter of the united nations. you can quibble for a long time about the compliance with the constitution and the un charter. but if we take not the letter, but the spirit of the agreements, what is happening. the idea, voiced in the federation council, to raise the question of denunciation of the document. our guest today is a wonderful domestic diplomat,

the end of the second world war, and the german question, which was the central issue for europe, was not fully resolved, although the first attempts to solve it were made during the post-zama conference in 1945, there was one constant: the germans wanted unification, yes, we they believed that the gdr was forever, but in the west they assumed from the very beginning that this was a temporary, incorrect situation, and that unification would happen. if you remember the constitution of the federal republic of germany, written in 1949, the twenty-third article already said that the east would unite with the west, the impetus to start negotiations

, to start this movement was given to the americans, yeah, they pushed kohl, well, knowing the situation, knowing the situation, in particular in the gdr, they pushed kohl to start negotiations, then it went, then everything went from there.

when one of these systems began to collapse, well, the eastern bloc, then the conditions were ripe for concluding this treaty, nato, to be

germany, in nato, not to be in germany, nato, the debate, as far as i remember, then, as far as i know, was then very there were serious proposals around this from our side, starting from the fact that germany should be completely neutral, ending with absolutely crazy ideas, one part will join nato, the other part will remain. naturally, the americans and the west pushed for the fact that the federal republic of germany will be, a united federal republic of germany, will be a member of nato, united, why? well, because, firstly, the west germans themselves could not even imagine that it could have been somehow different, and most importantly, the east germans did not object either. lothor demesier, who was then prime minister and signed this very agreement, he didn’t even say a word mentioned that it might be somehow different,

so... well, we can of course say that all this lies at the basis of what happened before, but let’s not forget that then there were more than 10 prosperous years of development in europe, so yes and no, most likely no , well, if after all - the idea that was voiced in the federation council, i understand that there is a political game, everything, everything is fine, but if you try to imagine its implementation , let's say we announce that we are withdrawing from the treaty, could this have any practical implications?

there will be no foreign troops in the lands, is this something that doesn’t suit us, or are we agreeing to the implementation of the idea that was voiced some time ago, that there will be a nato american base in rostock, yeah, that’s just one of the real consequences of the fact that we leave , we will lose even today, perhaps not a very effective lever of pressure, like this agreement, i have a question for you as a germanist and a person. and worked in different capacities, and what is happening now is a change in the trajectory of the german politics, in particular the behavior of chancellor scholz, who seems to be maneuvering, but somehow in a peculiar way, does this surprise you, or did you actually expect this, but you know, he is in a monstrous position as a politician, look at his coalition, it consists of god

knows from whom. and somehow reconcile different interests, this requires great skill, he doesn’t always succeed in this, let’s say the green ones, who criticize the loudest now, when they were just emerging, their goal, well, what they were counting on was somewhere there for 20 years forward, now they are already talking about how they will achieve their goals in 1960, well... they won’t make it, we’ll see about that, they proceed from the fact that they themselves won’t make it, that is, someone else will have to to pay, these are temporary workers who only think about holding on for now, and then we’ll see later, and see how the same habek, who is responsible for the economy and

energy, treats them. he is simply running away from his voters, there were wonderful shots of him trying to disembark from the ferry to the front dying and how he was greeted there , nothing worked out, he is a philologist by training, what does he even understand about economics, real economics, practically probably nothing, anna lena berbak, well, she has excellent results in trampoline jumping, what does she do in area of ​​foreign policy, not only in relation to... russia, no, in general, this is completely mind boggling, not difficult to understand, and you know, there’s an interesting thing, she makes decisions that are implemented, in particular, we’ll close four consulates from consulates general out of the five that we had in russia in germany, and german professionals who work in the foreign ministry say in conversations with us: listen, guys, let’s somehow make this matter better,

let’s find some solutions . no , yes, they are unpleasant, but at least they will allow us to return to a normal conversation after some time, to push through a decision that is unpleasant for us through parliament, scholz also fails, there is such a mixture, such a vinaigrette of voters that it’s practically impossible to make a normal decision, that’s all the matter remains up to him, he is stalling for time, and stalling for time, well, that is, we can say that now... such an intermediate moment in anticipation of something that will happen, and that no one knows, no one knows what will happen, but we assume that everything that needs to happen will happen, well, by the way, let’s say everything that needs to happen will happen, but what the reaction will be, what the reaction will be, no one can predict now, of course, thank you very much, sergei borisovich was our guest krylov, you can regret the unused...