why kill navalny before the elections? what's the point for all this to start, what's the point? this means that it is not beneficial for putin, but for whom? those who do not want, mortally, do not want putin to win these elections? well, look, i’m not an investigator, i’m not a prosecutor , i’m not an artist, we have this proverb, a saying: we have this, i’m an artist, my place is at the buffet, i’ve been drinking in the morning, i’m free all day, but according to my profession, in acting, even in directing too, when some text or some role appears, you analyze it logic, you are trying to understand the meaning of what was said, but if you analyze what happened, look, this is not a statement, this is an assumption, well, this is an artistic fantasy, let’s say. if, a few

minutes after what happened, god knows where, in the north of the russian country , condolences and accusations against putin appear as carbon copies, i have a question: maybe they were written in advance, or maybe this death was programmed, or maybe just something...

it seemed natural to have at least some kind of alibi. damn, do they even work? they are slackers, there is nothing else, there are no other thoughts, there are no other activities, the big cities of france filled paris with shit, and the husband of the prime minister, a few minutes after navalny’s death, this shit expresses pain. what is this, how is this? listen further, 3 hours after the news of navalny’s death, his wife, it turns out, is not where her husband died, 3 hours after his death, she ends up in munich at the munich security conference, with such a speech. i don't know. believe it or not

that news, terrible news that we receive only from government sources in russia, because for many years, and you know all this, you know all this, we cannot trust putin and putin’s government, they always lie, i want putin, all his entourage, putin, putin's friends , his governments knew that they would hang for what they did to our country, to my family, to my husband, responsibility, and this day will come very soon, and i want to call on the entire world community, everyone located in this room, people. all over the world so that we

can unite together to defeat this evil. look at how she interacts with the leaders of the civilized world, look at her smile, look at her make-up. look, look how even the roots of her hair are dyed, why, maybe she was preparing for this speech, maybe she knew that her husband would soon die, and was supposed to be an inconsolable widow at the munich conference, but does she look like an inconsolable widow , whose husband died 3 hours ago, did not study. yulia borisovna in

our academy of cinematic and theater arts, otherwise we would have taught her how to perform a role, at least for a while.

after the poisoning of navalny, he ended up in the military hospital in charité in berlin, where he was treated and where he received four or five vaccinations with the fizer vaccine. now let’s compare this with what is being discussed in the world regarding what vaccination with this vaccine could lead to. researchers have proven that those who took this vaccine among them saw an indecent increase in the number of people dying from ruptured blood clot here's the document: in england, between july 2021 and may 2023 alone

, there were 965,600 deaths among those vaccinated... nine deaths compared to 6,903 deaths among the unvaccinated, do you estimate the ratio? this means that during this period a total of 1,26,512 deaths were registered, with those vaccinated accounting for 94%, while not...

once, why, why, for what? researchers say such effects could occur up to 5 years after this vaccination. navalny was vaccinated in his twenties and died from a detached blood clot at the beginning of the twenty -fourth, again absolutely, so to speak, at the risk of being accused. in conspiracy theories, i can personally blame navalny’s death on, you know who? ursula vonderlein. remember, a piece of our besagon. you know that she is a defendant in a criminal investigation involving vaccine parasites. listen. and

unconditionally resign as president of the european commission. due to the fact that its action is in the present. she signed with these pharmaceutical companies. how is this possible in european a union that aims to be transparent in how people's money is used. therefore, i again ask you to again call for her immediate unconditional resignation. so , of these millions that fonden

lobbied for use in europe, four or five could have gone to navalny. can't this happen? actually? this is quite symbolic and strange, look, the main oppositionist survives after our bloody government tries to poison him with military, poisonous... so you have not received the attention of the world public, and why in america itself

they reacted so casually, easily and without any research or study, to such an unexpected death, as if it were a suicide, of the supplier of children by high-ranking pedophile jeffery epstein, why or else, i wonder, these are those who mourns. commander of navalny, have they ever heard what valeria ilinichna novodvorskaya said about navalny, who is difficult to accuse of being a fan of putin’s, so to speak, regime, listen, alexei navalny inspires panic in me horror, like the future leader of maddened crowds, and even with a nazi slant.

chechvarkin discussed the sale of rosneft and gazprom, when we recently sat with navalny and discussed how we would naturally. sell the russian property gazprom in parts

and rosneft, everyone also agreed that this will require several years of preparation, the bankers must also be very correct, everything must be neat so that the budget receives the maximum price, or as mr. navalny’s assistant vladimir ashurkov asked the officer british intelligence mi-6, we need to play on different chess fields: mass protests, civil initiatives,

propaganda. we need to establish contacts with the elite and convey to them that we are reasonable people who will not ruin everything and deprive them of their assets. well, i personally consider the speeches of two, as i understand it, deep believers in agents, gelman and roizman, to be the apogee of idiocy. listen. "i think that he will be canonized over time. this will not happen right away, but this awareness is already emerging among many, and over time he will be canonized. i said that i think that he life, death, his return to russia, his speeches at the trial, his sacrificial and conscious ascent to the scaffold, finally his murders, i see only one parallel: with christ.

normal, but it so happened that christ did not have a wife, but navalny did, now i want to talk about her, this is also interesting and very significant, look, 3 days after navalny’s death on february 19, yulia navalnaya speaks like this statement: hello, this is yulia navalnaya. today for the first time on this channel i want to appeal to you, i shouldn’t have been in this place, i shouldn’t have recorded this video in my place. there must be another person, but this person was killed by vladimir putin. 3 days ago, vladimir putin killed my husband, alexei navalny, but putin also took navalny away from you somewhere in a colony in the far north, beyond the arctic circle, in eternal winter, putin killed not just a man alexei navalny, he wanted to kill

ours with him hope, our freedom, our future. but today. i want to be close to you because i know that you have lost as much as i have. alexey died in a colony after three years of torture. he didn’t just sit, he didn’t sit like others sit, he was tortured, he was kept in a punishment cell, in a concrete box, please, just imagine, he was starved, three years of hunger, and not only did he not give up, he supported us all the time . he encouraged, laughed, joked, inspired, and never for a split second doubted what he was fighting for and what he was suffering for. alexey loved russia more than anything else in the world, he loved our country, he loved you, he believed in us, in our strength, in our future, that we deserve better, not

in words, but in deeds, so deeply sincerely believed. that i was ready to give my life for this, i ask you to share with me the rage, rage, anger, hatred for those who dared to kill our future, i address you with the words of alexei, in which i really believe, it’s not a shame to do little, it’s a shame not to do nothing, here i just want to dwell on this text, it is not emotional, it cannot be... for a sincere cry from the soul, these are not the words of an inconsolable widow, these are not sincere words coming from the heart, bitterness, desire for compassion, and so on and so forth, they wrote to her, she read it , look at how the drama of the text itself is built, it’s interesting, these are these oppositions, russia is hope

, russia is the future, russia is happy, these are navalny’s dreams and desires, right? works, and now let's look a little at the external form of this speech of hers , this is how her speeches are analyzed by people who want to convince us that this is true, that this is sincere, this is how, say, the new york times does it, this no frills, a stripped-down, almost severe look befitting the seriousness of her life, a visual analogue

to the navalnys' demand for a transparent and uncorrupted... in the russian government, the open cutouts on the board are meant to create a wide zone of clear , uninterrupted space around her head and shoulders, allowing for unobstructed review, there's even something slightly regal about it, as if she already existed in a future portrait of herself as queen or first... lady, her red manicure gives the only visual hint of the emotions hidden beneath the surface. thanks to this we see clearly, inside, she may be torn to shreds, but on the outside she looks extremely closed. your

mother. now let's take a look. on the other side of the cameras, this is the observation of a professional person who worked a lot on television, he is a screenwriter, and videographer, blogger and so on, his name is araslan nigomatyanov, a whole filming studio has been put up, non-chrome key, the volume of space has been worked out, the location has been selected with the help of a cinematic image, symmetry is maintained on both sides. videographers will confirm that in this regard, everything in the frame is artificial and thought out. a three-point light scheme, a painting light

that fills the backlight on the top of the head, and it is clear that the light was set professionally, that is, behind the scenes there is a whole battery of film equipment behind on the sides of yulia, three warm sources, against the background of the woman they put an additional blue cold. lighting to convey to the viewer yulia's state. we noticed the screen cascade, these are black stripes at the top and bottom of the screen. this usually happens when shooting with anomorphic lenses, they are due to the special structure of the lenses, they seem to expand the visible space. i must tell you that this is a very expensive pleasure. but only the editors will notice this. but between changes of plans it is clear that the lavalier microphone on the board abruptly changes its position relative to the chain on the neck. this only happens

when the fish, that is, of course the video, is assembled from different takes, between which julia probably moved. and here is another confirmation that this was edited from different takes. see how the pillows move behind her back. on the couch, why am i talking about this? well, because this is a professional thing, i can’t help but notice it, when a person who is really experiencing great grief and wants to share it, he cannot be distracted, he cannot get up, drink a cup of coffee, apparently, go to the toilet, so they removed the microphone , then they installed it again. and we see that in relation to the chain it is really in different places, that is, this is a film set that has a very specific task that needed to be

completed, now let's take a second let's disconnect from everything and imagine a person, a woman who really experiences grief, who really suffers, who really spills out. meanings, there are many of them, they are a very interesting counterpoint to the truth,

look, i want to draw your attention to the words about their love with navalny. putin took away the most precious thing i had, the closest and most beloved person. all these years i was next to alexey, elections, house arrest, searches, detentions, prisons, poisonings, again rallies, arrests again jail. here is our last meeting with him in mid-february 2022. our last photo: in exactly 2 years putin will kill him. all these years i have been next to alexei. i was happy to be there. with him and support him, guys, listen, she is not under arrest, she is not under sanctions, she can come at any second, go anywhere,

but after learning about her husband’s death, after 3 hours she ends up not where his body is, on munich conference, okay, let’s say she’s scared, they might scare her because she ’ll be arrested, well then, then why? in 2021 she drags him to russia herself, knowing what awaits him there, but something doesn’t add up here, it means someone needs it, maybe including her, who knows, and once again it’s about love, well ok, i don’t want to interfere in personal relationships, but still the realization that a person close to you, whom you talk about as... a loved one, about whom you suffer, is in prison, where at this time you, well where and what is the funniest and most

cynical? that what you do and how you live while your husband is in prison is explained by another person, we talked about him before, listen, life is given to a person once, it is given exclusively for the extraction of joy, pleasure, travel, on the contrary, it is extremely important for a person who is under pressure and under pressure to travel as much as possible, to see as much as possible.

how others are sitting, he was tortured, he was kept in a punishment cell, in a concrete box, please , just imagine, they mocked him, cut him off from the world, did not give him a pen and paper to write a letter to me or our children, how is what he says corrected? madam navalnaya about the plight and torment of her husband, how much can this be combined with... with the way she received an oscar for best documentary film, the quality of which was determined not by the cinema, only by the fact that it was a film about a russian oppositionist. it seems to me that the document is the most convincing about what kind of person yulya borisovna navalnaya is. listen to what alexei navalny's mother, lyudmila

ivanovna navalnaya, says about her. dear yulia borisovna abrosimo, now i want to turn to you, you last saw my son in february 2022, you do not have a ban on places in russia , not a single criminal case has been opened against you, but you have not come to visit him in 2 years, in fact, since the spring of 2021 you are not a member of my smf, you appear publicly in company with dear men, it was you...

and the fact that yulia borisovna did not come to the funeral of her, as she says, beloved and only husband. navalny's funeral took place on march 1. quite a lot of people came to the funeral who supported navalny and believed him. there was only one who was not there at the funeral, who probably should have been there was his wife, as she said, loving and only, his children, but there were other people. if we remember novodvorskaya’s words about navalny, we talked about this today, remember, alexey navalny inspires panic in me.