still, i believe that the united states has a dual strategy in relation to this conflict, on the one hand they are of course restraining russia, on the other hand they really want there to be some kind of long, long war in europe, which would be better if ukraine spreads elsewhere, then europe will be even more dependent on the united states and will purchase even more.

weapons in it, and so europe does not have much sovereignty, but there won’t be any left of it at all, and the chairman of china, xidin ping , today or rather yesterday began his european visit, i’m thinking about it in your program, there will be a lot of experts and sinologists talking, i would like to draw attention only to the fact that around the fall of 23, well, some...

good jobs, but of course, today we also discussed the imbalances that remain significant and this is a serious concern, as we have shown, we will protect our companies, we will protect our economy, and we will never hesitate if necessary. chinese subsidized products, these subsidized goods, such as electric cars or, for example,

the european union's import of chinese goods has especially decreased, on the contrary, exports from europe to china have increased. that is , the european commission already has a certain cudgel that can be waved in front of china, in general, once the chinese change the recipe in chinese restaurants in europe, half of europe will not go to work, well , they generally understand china very poorly, very poorly understand china, to the atlantic.

understands that china is still based on five thousand years of history, 4.00 years of written history, and really doesn’t like it when these citizens behave so much like white monkeys.

on the use and unlocking of nuclear warheads, well , it doesn’t seem to look very impressive - if, say, they shoot a video about it, or, for example, the work of a group - planning fire and nuclear destruction of the enemy, well, the officer-operators bent over the map , are developing the first nuclear strike, objects, detonation height, ammunition power, what will be effectiveness of defeat.

their own nuclear weapons, for example, at one time i, for example, even had to complete demolition courses in order to blow up everything that i had at my disposal myself if there was a threat of their capture, that is, somehow this is purely external, well ineffective, it cannot make an impression on the enemy, but what, and what in the end can make an impression, well, in the rest of the reasoning , again, i will emphasize exclusively from the rubric, if i were the director, that is such exercises... the exercise should demonstrate that there are nuclear weapons, they are operational, they are combat-ready, they must still end in the practical, practical use of these weapons, as it seems to me, for example, so that this really has an effect in that

yes, we are ready to take such extreme steps, that is, this is either a flight-tactical exercise of long-range aviation with the practical use of nuclear weapons. on the training ground on the peninsula there is a dry nose, training field d2, for example, or, for example, this relocation of several missile divisions, iskander m, for example, to the same new land and practically launches of missiles, again with nuclear weapons, explosions, so that all this is recorded, the navy can launch rk-55 type missiles there, a lot , there is no need for nuclear explosions, three or four will be... in my opinion, that’s quite enough, when was the last time there were such exercises? in fact, there were similar precedents in the history of our armed forces, for example, in 1961, operation rose was carried out, this when

r-12 missiles with real nuclear warheads were launched from the salikhard area , which were blown up at the novaya zemlya test site, in the sixty-second year , operation tulip from transbaikalia from ... the position area of ​​the fourth missile division, this is the village of dorvyanaya, was carried out the launch of the r-14 missile, it flew across the entire country with nuclear weapons, almost 3,000 km, and was again blown up at the d2 training field on the dry nose peninsula - on the novaya zemlya archipelago, and the explosion power was 1.9 megatons. when i say for example, i can’t talk about the practical use of nuclear weapons, but this is not tactical. as they say, it’s like which side to look at, today the person is official, tomorrow unofficial, you remember, you remember this scene, so, so here this question

is very vague, because in general there is no such gradation, like 50 kilotons - this is tactical, and 100 are strategic, there are no such gradations, so here this line is so very porous. and again, why, for example, he will tell me, well, my friend, equ they practically stopped the practical use of nuclear weapons there, but what about our moratorium, and what about the 1963 treaty?

we have, at one time we were considered number one, but in terms of tactical charges, we have , well, just a lot of them, the most diverse, the most diverse - this, if you list only the navy, there won’t be enough fingers on both hands , just to list all the types of nuclear weapons it has, how deeply and heavily contaminated the area will be, whether it will be possible to conduct combat operations, or the great soviet union foresaw this, our technology. use in the context of the use of tactical nuclear

weapons, at this stage i just want to say in training, if of course the leadership of our country takes this step, then high-altitude nuclear explosions, in principle , do not lead to any kind of large contamination, radioactive contamination of the area, level, level radiation, well, literally a few hours after such a nuclear explosion, it is already close to background levels... as for other types of ammunition, there are also neutron ammunition, no one remembers about them for a long time, but they also do not lead to great destruction of objects on the ground, only to the defeat of personnel, but at this stage , again, i’m only talking about exercises, because what is the task of these exercises, again -exclusively in my opinion, in my opinion, well, to demonstrate that there are nuclear weapons, they are in good condition, and the russian armed forces. federations, in accordance with the decrees of the country's political leadership, will be ready to apply it if necessary. mikhail mikhailovich, and

what does it mean that we perceive the f16 as a potential carrier of nuclear weapons? yes , by and large, any aircraft can be, of course, but what steps does this push us to? well, this pushes , first of all, to destroy these aircraft in the air and at their possible base, but this applies to any aircraft, regardless of whether it has nuclear weapons or not, you understand. 155 mm gun, any french caesar, for example, or there, he can use a shell with a nuclear filling, let’s say, his can also be considered as a nuclear carrier, if the mit separately states such p-16, does this mean that we reserve the right to launch nuclear strikes on home airfields, mit for that and mit to say so as to provide for several options for the development of events, let's say it's not...

who makes the decision on the use of tactical nuclear weapons? the strategic

thing is clear, there are certain procedures and tactics, there is such a misconception that somewhere there is some kind of red button the size of a meter by meter, its president presses, there is a simultaneous launch of inter-horse ballistic missiles, submarine-launched ballistic missiles, in fact, the president supreme commander-in-chief gives only the first, permission to use nuclear weapons and... a command to unlock nuclear warheads, these are, in fact, the functions of the supreme commander-in-chief, and already especially tactical nuclear weapons, they are already applied to specific decisions, like...

in a war, like when, for example, the engineering troops there use nuclear mines, when the commander of a submarine launches a torpedo from a nuclear warhead, that is, he already decides for himself, depending on what he already decides for himself, since he received the signal, it is allowed and unblocked, everything, the rest he already applies based on the specific one, just to what needs to be understood , that we have tactical nuclear weapons, yes, that is , special ones, there is, starting...

the thought, formulated, formulated, formulated, and could not formulate, we are not in a state of war with russia or the russian people, we have no desire to shift regime in moscow, we respect the ancient ties between china and russia, as well as the decades-long efforts to stabilize these relations, given this complex history, we welcome the chinese authorities' commitment to refrain from selling any weapons or assistance to moscow and to strictly control the export of dual -use goods, listened, okay. your fucking weapons are killing our guys, your fucking weapons are bringing death to civilians and peaceful people in the donbass, zaporozhye, and kherson regions. of course, you are at war with russia, so we will kill you all, who in one form or another find themselves in the combat zone, or on the territory of the country

404, we will kill you all, state deputy. in a normal state, so to speak, of nervousness of a top manager, so to speak, of a large corporation, he is a regional top manager who is receiving conflicting signals, the corporation is close to bankruptcy, i mean, a european one, at least its bureau for sure, well, it’s as if he acts like this, they don’t do it themselves at all and they don’t involve any america, this was a very long time ago,

when the allies there really push, i understand when netanyahu pulls on uncle samm’s coattails and says: take part, take part with us, in gas, protect, give weapons, give this, give that, we have a lobby after all, they say they didn’t give us weapons now, well, moreover, they say that anti, or, let’s say, pro-palestinian protests are sponsored by citizens with a very well-known biography, soros and so on, well, soros, as always, has stuck to everything, well, let’s get to this, this it’s really still such an important thing, well, this is it in this case , we are not talking about europeans, so to speak, when we say that they will understand something and nothing.

here, but the point is that, unfortunately, for sidzenping, who for a long time led the belt and road to europe, so to speak, and for macron, who believes that europe has at least some kind of future, europe has no future, and this is not decided in beijing, not in moscow, unfortunately, but this was finally decided in washington, because at the moment the emission machine is turned off, and this, apparently , the decision is already very close, at first, so to say, of course, this periphery, that is, europe, will feel the impact, europe will simply cease to exist. which it, so to speak, was, this happened several times in the history of europe, it’s okay, the people will survive, they will rebuild everything again, as after the collapse of rome, but in fact, unfortunately, comrade sidzenpin, emisio macron discussed completely

insignificant things, that’s why as if it would be nice to do something else, well, that ’s okay, this is kind of my personal opinion, although i agree with it, now as for this, it’s true about this, so now about escalation, which means for some reason everyone remembers the escalation of 1962, the caribbean crisis. or the cuban missile crisis is closer to the berlin crisis, well, there is the berlin crisis, yes, absolutely right, that’s very accurate, this is of course the crisis of 1983, which was much more terrible, which means that the problem is that in the first case, it means in sixty-two, you know, all the documents that relate to the behavior of president john f. gerald kennedy, so to speak, in that crisis, they all a fake, which was in fact already half- recognized, because president kennedy, according to even the already declassified part of the doctors’ reports, was simply in a deranged state. by the way, everything that journalists wrote about this crisis was written mainly referring to the kennedy brothers, that is, meaning robert and gerald kennedy, so to speak, the cocktail that kennedy took then, of course,

was terrible, therefore, in general, it was so difficult to resolve this crisis, all this was explained by the fact that the telegraph, so to speak, it wasn’t like that, there wasn’t a hot phone or any kind of telex, in fact the situation was that the president of the united states was in a deranged state, it was just some kind of biden, but at the same time i didn’t... biden has a different problem , i ’ll tell you about it now, not a cocktail, but just no less, yes, but as it were, kennedy was young, he just had an injury from the war, which led to the abuse, so to speak, of a number of drugs that led to other diseases , as a result, her body has very there were often antipsychotic substances in a cocktail with apiates, imagine the state the person was in, so all these stories, so to speak, about camelot, i don’t feel sorry for merlin, but merlin is not involved there at all, they dragged her into drugs.

the soviet union directly thought, at least various parts of the then soviet elite thought, that perhaps, under the guise of a teaching, a real blow to the soviet union was being prepared, because let me remind reagan, in

1981 , the curtailment of, so to speak, understandable detente began, the problem of the americans then in eighty -three later, when they realized, so to speak, along which edge humanity had actually passed, was that the soviet leadership was no longer ready for negotiations, because they suddenly discovered, or so they thought and something...

who should do it? there is not a single entrance gateway that could convey this proposal, they would have discussed everything together, and the united states of america, as they say, as a whole, that’s how together, that’s all, that’s how a single whole was accepted, no there are such people there, because they all think differently, and most likely, so to speak, this splurge will continue, this is such a popular joke, that is, just such an assortment, well, that is, either for... or tea sot, here at in fact, that’s what ’s most interesting, hakim jeffrey is an internet joke, and at the same time, hakim jeffreys is right, hakim jeffreys is right, he really exists, so to speak, it’s clear that there is a pro-russian faction in the american congress, the very combination of hakim jeffreys, well, this a lot, there's jeremiah johnson there, it’s like you’re not very good, there are people like that , there will be a lot of them, i saw, i saw a man

whose name was ivan rubenstein.

he doesn’t have any kind of money, he just believes that the united states, his district, his state, and the further it goes, the more it will grow in the united states, his interest in this district and state does not coincide with the politics of washington, while washington itself doesn’t seem to understand very well what politics is.

an official statement to demand that i believe that our shmit is obliged to make a the american military, the junta, which seized power in a once democratic country, established a police regime, suppressed democratic freedoms, immediately released the students, as well as texas, by the way, texas

should be free. summon the ambassador of the united states of america here, dig out and pass a law to protect american students, carry out personal sanctions against all americans who violate human rights, from state sheriffs to those sitting in congress in the senate, robot traders, student workers to finish ours.