no, zhen, we are talking about something else, look, a person signs a document, another person does not want to comply, he goes to court, and not to society, and he says, this is a filkin’s letter - what is it, why me must obey, the court must not be based not on the opinion of society, on judicial acts, on the constitution, on legislation, not on public opinion polls, that’s the problem, i can’t agree with you.

there must be a court, legislation, and so on, but in the current conditions it relies on everything that this government does, regarding agree that this is really legitimate, there is no legal basis here, i confirm this too, but here there is something that is called above, above the law, under the law, instead of the law, but it works, whether we like it or not, but not we are simply stating this, that is, this is tyranny, that is , this is no longer democracy, this is no longer the rule of law, this is no longer the society that bases. this is no longer a legitimist society, this is no longer a society that is governed by laws, that is, it is already anarchy with elements of tyrony, you know, we can both you want to call it, as long as this process is manageable there, as long as they are talking to them, and for me there will be a certain, well, factor of legitimacy, this is that peace summit, during the break they were just talking about if it comes and there will be a certain number of countries there and the leaders of countries or representatives of countries who will support him are the most de facto, i say again, i am not the law. well, i don’t know

, there are no analytics, this is a minority, but if we take 50 countries, they say it will be normal for them, for the population of the planet, then in general it’s quite a minority, you know, vladimirovich, for us maybe this is important, but for us it doesn’t matter who we hang, but his fate is obvious, moreover, it is illegitimate, as dmitry antolyevich medvedev said, and even a pig in a cage. can sign, i quote nikolai vasilyevich gogl, can sign an act of surrender, it doesn’t matter to us, well, as long as we are talking about the world summit, as long as we are talking about the fact that it retains its legitimacy, it has no alternative within the political field, it has even when modeling the situation , again, i’m just quoting sociologists, he is still like i’m right, vladimir vladimirovich absolutely, he will even defeat zaluzhny, i’m just wondering, what will he bring sociology to the court?

we are for him, he is our military leader, he is the leader of the ukrainian nation and we are following him, now it’s a good one, a meter with a cap, let me continue the thought, you are right here too, but i will say this thing, just don’t be offended right away, everything is correct, all this, look, the fact that there is only one legitimacy and the fact that there is no social support, which was 2 years ago, this is absolutely accurate, the question is now obvious, so they suggest to me, well, think about saying why is this what happens?

i propose the following position: i believe that may 21 is not a critical point for the ukrainian authorities, first, i’ll try to speak very clearly once, the question is that

some changes will follow, yes, they will, but what for them this was irrelevant, no critical consequences will come in the near future, this is also true, what will be the next decision, it can.

answer yes, and you said at one of the conferences , a parliamentary-presidential republic, the parliament retains its legitimacy, retains, the constitutional court retains its legitimacy, preserves, no, then no, then ze should step aside, then the head of the parliament should come first, including switzerland, who should say, now, due to uncertainty, i lead the country and i take myself powers, there are the same options for the development of events, that’s why i’m saying, i’m listening to these.

argue endlessly, we can argue met, well, i, i'm talking about what, we can endlessly, whether he is legitimate or not, but the fact is that we are entering a period of dubious legitimacy zelensky, everyone understands this, well , everyone understands this, so from this point of view, on the one hand, through these events, i think they will try to somehow give him legitimacy to his power, but on the other hand , there are big risks of soft delegitimization.

the situation inside ukraine is developing so rapidly that we cannot even in the short term predict what will happen in a week or in a month, you know, this is how everything is developing, i think by the fall of this year we let's see what the attitude of society will be, what the situation will be at the front, so far it is far from being in favor of ukraine.

they slipped in either the beekeeper yushchenko, or the criminal yanukovych, or the comedian zelensky, i ask

the question: how would the situation or the history of ukraine develop if at one time, for example, yevgeny kushnarov came to power, for example, yes, i, for example, for to me he is a high authority, a man with colossal political experience, a statesman, well , who still needs to be looked for, you know, i just knew him personally, but probably there is people who also knew him, well, here he is somehow. miraculously died while hunting, yes, there is another business executive, yes, who showed his effectiveness not in words, not in the public sphere, but through his direct work, what happened to him, they just took him, killed him, i have this feeling when we we say that ukraine will lose controllability, i have a feeling that this country has been controlled from the outside all this time of independence, they modeled the situation, who can, who can’t, who should, who shouldn’t, whom...

a sociologist comes, now you live in kiev, you open the door, any sociological center in ukraine works under the roof, under the roof of this kiev regime, there is no democracy there, seven people don’t work there, and what should i answer him that i... am against zelensky remaining here to preside over the country, yes of course, i will say that i want to be taken to the sbu, so where do 20% come from those who are for the elections and 80 who are against, so i think, monitor internet resources of ukraine, you are a little mistaken, much more are for elections, there are much more of them than 50% of ukrainians, if i i was wrong about the elections, i would

n’t stand here next to you, the price of the issue is very high, the issue of the professional work of sociologists in the 2000s, this price is a matter of not only a career. and there was no shamanism there, because there was a lot at stake there, so when sociologists gave, they had the same key data, there with rare exceptions, because then there was a competitive environment, there was a competitive environment, there was competition, it gave this counterbalance , there was no shamanism there, guys, you understand a simple thing, how many technologists they went to work as shamans for ukraine, dozens of them, i knew them personally, well, no need to tell me, let me tell you about this situation a little, well, colleagues, i’ll go again... you’re just talking about professionals, they were on the other side, with yushchenko competent guys worked, yulia is competent, well, you don’t hear, you’re talking about professionals, but here we are talking about political shamans, these are different categories, well, as it is now, well, well, you just don’t hear, well, that’s how it is now in america there are serious sociological firms, yes, and there are when biden speaks, yes

nothing to think about, i lead everyone on issues, they brought me a newspaper here, oh, i want a quote. and there are political shamans who are based on the customer, i would like to add, exactly 5 years ago, when zelensky was undergoing the inauguration ceremony, i still remember when in our collective community of analysts and journalists there was such an unspoken agreement, let’s give him a few weeks of chance, let’s not troll him right away, let’s make a mistake, let the person prove himself as possible.

worked with andrey romnich belous for many years in one team, so that is, here, in principle, this kind of course on audit, course on transformation of the ministry of defense, course on economic integration can be traced, i just wanted to make another literally interesting remark, like china, china, which is our key ally. after vladimir putin’s visit to beijing, he managed his foreign relations with the us defense giants, literally today he introduced sanctions against three more us holdings, these are general etomics, general dynamics and booing. and literally in november last year, china imposed sanctions against lockit martin and norton gruman, that is , in fact, he completely covered the entire key five

with his sanctions. this is an asymmetrical answer, and this answer is much more trenchant than all this chatter. that personnel policy in russia is conducted according to the course of the president, and not the president of ukraine, who has 95% of unfulfilled decisions, but we heard aristovich’s former colleague, and now an extremist, a foreign agent, so from tomorrow we will read the western press, but then, what my colleagues say is correct, then that a significant number of journalists, and

just people who are trying to cling to the fact that they are more far-sighted than others, are already beginning. the historical part of kiev, exactly the core of kiev, yes, well , here is st. sophia, diagonally further st. andrew's church, here is the golden dome and st. michael's cathedral, here is the tithe church, this is a cross, this is how kiev was built, this is how kiev was built, the city of gradkia, one temple, the second temple, third. and now they’re married, but it doesn’t matter, yes, what i want to say is st. andrew’s church, where according to legend, the apostle andrew was, yes, she was handed over to bartholomew for a bribe. and now this is his residence behind the tomos. zolotovsky st. michael's cathedral, now efiphanius is there, this is the ocu,

a public organization. st. sophia cathedral, thank god it’s also a museum, that is, it’s not active, there may be a museum, a museum, but the tithe church is the only tithe church, this chapel was the only place and the only drop, as they say in ukraine, where... it belonged to the moscow patriarchate or the ukrainian orthodox church, the only place, and it was destroyed only because the cross was not needed, you know, the buildings remained, the spirit, there is no spirit, there is no soul, this monster, whose last name is zelensky, said to demolish this not because, you know, someone has something... it was in the way, or there...

and where are all those people, oh, who call themselves isti, you ask me this question often, and where are all these people who are ready

to give their lives for viruses, there are people there, only a few walk around, a small number of people are carrying flowers, people are afraid, people live in fear, but as for, i want to press on pavlovich’s topic, look,

when, i’ll say a terrible thing, when people in ukraine, when the ukrainian people voted for zelensky, it was the ukrainian people themselves who brought a verdict on themselves and pronounced a verdict

on the ukrainian state, exactly then, because how can you elect a person who is incompetent, how can you elect a person who is not ready, but nevertheless they voted for him, so you voted for him, wait, i wasn’t in the elections, yes, but you voted for him, no, no, and who did you support for poroshenko?

he was elected legally, no one argued, poroshenko lost, lost, here comes a guy whom i ask today, who is he, who is he?

germany reads, counts, and he tells such a real thing, before that he says: ukrainians, close your ears, and he gives a quote, now he’s not ukrainian, wait, he gives a quote, he says: before the start of the war, 40 million lived in ukraine 142 in russian federation, one to three, now in ukraine the ratio is 1:7, i’ll translate it into numbers, khadarkovsky says, ukrainians, there are less than 20 million of you, where?

according to which not less than 30 million slavs. why is it important to recognize the genocide specifically against the soviet people, because it is a historical fact. this work is extremely important, especially today, when western politicians are trying to rewrite the results of the second world war. russia was the first to convey a resolution on the inadmissibility of glorifying nazism. mostly europeans abstained. the united states voted against a very well-thought-out attack in the information field on our historical identity, because this is the basis of any national statehood. it is important that everyone involved, all humane treatment of people were established, even if these criminals are already dead.

so colorful, bright, interesting, breathtaking, jokes, humor, everything is very cool, well, for example, aliens will arrive, such a rich film, these sounds, this whole view, many analogies, of course, with a soviet film, i would i didn’t call it a remake, a reshoot, the film was completely independent, it moved away from me, it’s... an adventure, it’s a very interesting comedy, you don’t stand a chance, i’m completely delighted stayed, listen, well, this is cool, wonderful, just like that, love, romance, that right now yes, i’m going to cry now, this is slyas, this is just world class, but very cool, i’m proud, it was something like the whole movie

in one breath. let's meet!