is, people, but then you have representation in the affirmative, this is affirmed by all the believers in the parliament of believers and non-believers , an equilibrium, have you calculated how much? it's not a matter of what it isn't, i'll explain, because it's not a criterion.

parted, so colorful, bright, interesting, breathtaking, jokes, humor, everything is very cool, well, for example, aliens will arrive, such a rich film, these sounds, this whole view, many analogies, of course, with a soviet film, i i wouldn't call it - it's an adventure, it's very interesting

comedy, you don’t have a chance, in general you were completely delighted, listen, well, this is cool, wonderful, that’s it, love, romance, right now, yes, i’m going to cry now, this is tears, this is just world class, but very cool . i’m proud, it was something like the whole film in one breath, we’ll meet in the future, 100 years from now, it’s clear to everyone that russia is not a country of gas stations, russian digital solutions can be taken to new heights, there are prospects, ours are more brutal, yes, ours are more brutal , there will be more than exactly what the figure helps, you are incomparably original in your class? everything in general with

production, raw materials and exports, what it is, our product. we will take on this case, it will be an honest detective story, the history of mankind is not 2024 before...

began, by the way, there were pagan gods, pagan religion, and you want to say that the pagan gods were not involved in politics, that they were not involved in politics ministers. that cult, i don’t know, i’m a christian, i’m somehow talking about them, well, you’re a christian, and there are muslims and the other is not a believer, you for yourself, i’m in favor of - believers also have a place in the duma, openly, and not hidden in parliament, that is , places, they don’t come there, no, no, well, you don’t like it, why don’t i like it, i ask, they don’t come there, they ’re not there, well, peasants.

in every program the constitution of the russian federation, i have been criticizing it since 1993, moreover, i voted against it, i just voted and never hid it and explained then why i did it, so i propose, this is the scheme that you you are afraid to give it up.

at the local government level, let me remind you, that in the nineties i created the russian-zemstvo movement, it was very powerful enough, and we worked on the system of local self-government, and there it was correct, because at the level of villages, cities

, after all, social groups of the population are already technical issues, like they are determined by which group the voting takes place, well, we went along the path of municipalities, but de facto today...

that the united states of america will definitely take advantage of this situation in order to try to shake up the situation in iran, and now, when elections have been announced, we will see more on the streets of iranian cities and young people will be taken out, and women will be taken out again, there are already signs of this, we know how recently the same ahmadinejab has become more active, who for a year almost did not come out of his ... underground, or so to speak, now he has entered the political arena again, by the way, yesterday he was there, the council meeting was in a white shirt, everyone was in black, because it was mourning, and he was in a white, you know, what the person is remembered for, he did not name russia otherwise, as a child of satan, and also blamed

the soviet union for the holodomor of '41, that allegedly after our troops, together with the british, entered iran, because they were afraid of the german pro... this is fraught with very serious consequences, so, of course, today, every possible effort is being made to prevent this from happening, and of course, we will need colossal diplomatic, and not only diplomatic, now steps, actions, well, first of all, listen, we understand today that - we have a crown prince there from khaminei headquarters, which stands today after the passing of racey, after the tragic death of racey, becomes...

in part of the kingdom of saudi arabia, i think that we must definitely do today at the level of our foreign ministry, at the level of our diplomacy, of course, to pursue a slightly different policy regarding iran, that is, we want to lose iran completely, we don’t want to lose iran, but we must take into account internal interests since that’s why we are invited to play now, today is a day of mourning, a funeral day, well, like today, yes, not on the day of a funeral play around, we're discussing it now.

pro-russian, this, unfortunately, has passed away, but he is not alone, this whole class

was pro-russian, for us it is enough that he was pro-iranian, pro-iranian, but in his policy he was a reference point to russia, let’s not forget, that iransi did not declare this anywhere, raisiy always in the twenty-second year, when the northern military district began, practically risi, came and met with our president, one of the first.

perhaps today and maybe there would be no need to talk about this, because i, mr. adjalalik, i also know the ambassador well, and you said huge condolences, we took flowers to the entire embassy, ​​this is a tragedy, i ’m just saying now that in our foreign policy, using the example of iran, we must take into account different options for us to lose iran practically, well, this is a disaster, we cannot allow this, we will not interfere. affairs of iran, but the fact that today our diplomacy should intensify is clear here,

well, i look at how our diplomacy has now come together, yes, at the time of the tragedy, almost all communication channels were involved, and the representative of the presidential administration, mr. levitin, whose close connections directly through this line was instantly with his colleagues on the call, and the president of the russian federation.

that's what it says, it means that this is a globalist institution, which was created, like many globalist institutions, as a supranational authority, so that the americans, the anglo-saxons, let's say , still not quite americans, britain, the usa, draw your line, suddenly they you see, what they get is that this very moose begins to work against them, this is generally the fate of all globalists. institutions for the future, this is a golem waiting for its creator, let’s just say, today there are none yet, this prosecutor general musa, he looks somehow ridiculous, but tomorrow all these institutions will be turned against those who created them, so support national institutions, the national

state, what russia is doing is absolutely, not only absolutely correct, it has absolute support. in countries the global south, because we know how, through various foundations, through various other globalist institutions, climate control and so on, the system of national governance, the nation state, is being destroyed, so i think that this is the end of musa, so natural, and literally the last word , there was also information there today that our assets, finally the european union made such a decision, the profit they earned there will not confiscate the assets yet, but will direct it to support ukraine. if we don't answer, this would be a colossal mistake, because ours, if you look at the accounts, this is 2 trillion rubles for today, this is foreign residents who blocked the money and are allowing it, 2 trillion rubles, let’s calculate how much it is in dollars, we definitely need to take it, this is impossible i just can’t answer, i just can’t, i definitely need to clap, i agree, please, i

would also like to say a few words about your discussion, which i think is very interesting. under the influence of the first state duma received some kind of parliamentary form, in in general, there is a range of options for how exactly in our states, if we talk about the cis , parliamentarism arose, the understanding that now this form is there of proportional representation of the party, the party organization is in

movement, now we have created a new team and are writing a book as once about non-parliamentary forms of expressing the power of the people, for example, in belarus there is a people’s assembly, similarly in kazakhstan there are bodies that, not through parliamentary means, nevertheless express at the national level help to express and respond more quickly to the interests or changes in the interests of the people, although of course parliament always remains the most important instrument for developing legislation and representing the people in power, but now after all. i wanted to talk about ukraine, joseph brodsky is credited with a phrase that we know, though from the words of sergei davlatov, that for a long time i did not believe that something stupid could be said in english. it seems to me that in recent years western politicians have been arguing very actively are working to prove the opposite, and when i read it, i thought that sebrodsk probably meant foreigners,

yes, for whom english is a means of communication, but it looks like he meant it in general his life in america and the understanding that, so to speak, whether a politician is wearing a frock coat or whether he studied in ethan, does not in any way guarantee that he only speaks...

and articles, well, in general, you really can say stupid things in english and even quite a lot, but in general the main one the message is tough, and yes, too

, an attempt was made to put forward a theory of victory and a strategy for victory, but here let me not analyze, except that the main conclusion is that the curation will last a year, it was said so, here’s a year you will hold out for... now on average a thousand ukrainians are dying a day, yes, yes, hold out for a year, that’s another minus 360,000 dead, which means that’s a million more

wounded, yes, yes, that is, he suggests returning to the conversation with them through one and a half million ukrainians, that’s exactly how everything is in fact, but that is, in a year it won’t matter who to talk to, judging by everything, that is , hold on, so that later there will be someone, well... american companies, so the candidate for the sale of ukraine is new, but it is clear that it is not, not for the americans to decide, what will happen here, and what will happen to ukraine, here. current dynamics of the conflict. and just a few words about this international criminal court. if you look at the map, it turns out like this:

the entire western hemisphere is a member of the international criminal court with the exception of the united states, and the european the union, the most loyal colonies of the european union in africa, and some states in asia that are quickly reconsidering their position, for example, the philippines refused, having signed this agreement, and withdrew a couple of years ago. from it, and thus, and this structure, well, as you correctly said, it is completely inanimate, it does not work with the state, it was created, that is, its object of interest is individuals, yes, who, well, apparently express the will of the state, but nevertheless they answer in their personal quality, the russian federation actively worked on the text of this agreement in the nineties, if you look at it most likely with european grants or american lawyers, we have excellent lawyers, criminals, as they call themselves... that is, in criminal law , but in the end, the russian federation nevertheless signed the charter in 2002 and thought about it for quite a long time before abandoning it in

2016.

when we went to mariupol, we not only went to fight, we had an order to help the locals, we strictly we adhered to this order they were storming, they got off, for the first time they were there to wound me, there were all the bullets to fly out, there was only one.

generation, i had almost no more strength, i thought that was it, at that moment a local guy came up to me, where he came from, i didn’t even notice, i’ll still be grateful to the stranger.

well, i’m just in a difficult situation regarding all these discussions, but i can’t, i can’t remain silent, it seems to me that this discussion, this isn’t radical enough, because i’ll tell you honestly, well, even in the west it’s already, so to speak , let's move on some. ah, but i, for example, i think i am deeply convinced that the very idea of ​​representation in power is deeply flawed, as representation, because it implies the limited capacity of the represented, obviously, in the very assumption, this is how it is structured, therefore no democracy through the idea representation cannot be realized, in principle,

this, of course, these are monkey glasses, well, parliamentarism was in britain after the glorious revolution and before it, this is parliamentarism, we have a federal assembly in which there is the state duma, and the federation council and no parliament, but parliamentarism - they said that there is none.