the movement was treated, i understand that yes, but right away it’s the same thing, we don’t have any parliamentarism, these are monkey glasses, well , parliamentarism was in britain after the glorious revolution and before it, this is parliamentarism, we have a federal assembly, in which there is a state the duma and the federation council and no parliament, but parliamentarism - that

there is not a single state duma deputy, i would like to see him now, but what when you told them that he is not a parliament, but they call you a parliament, wait, vitaly, no, vitalitorevich, first of all, look, attention, here you are, after all, you kind of want to go into politics, i don’t, i don’t forbid them to call themselves that, who am i, i don’t want to be such a politician.

so the idea of ​​representation in itself is vicious, in this sense it cannot in any way be a form of implementation of democracy or democracy, this is the first, second, this is what you were talking about, veche or not veche, elena, it’s not about the veche, but the point is that we need to return to a rigid understanding of rights and duties, because rights, in particular political rights.

well, it’s unknown, you know, this is generally the case everywhere, that’s why, the second fundamental thing, along with the fact that the idea of ​​representation will have to be abandoned in the future. is this the emergence of rights, and above all political ones, due to the voluntary acceptance of certain responsibilities? well, let me explain, yes , in the ancient, in the ancient, when there was democracy there for a short time, in the ancient world, then it was the duty to stand in the ranks of a legion or phalanx to die for athens or for rome in athens, that’s how it was at that time too, but well, in connection with this arose politically.

which, in principle, has reached, well, the idea, yes, originating from the ancient mediterranean, and these problems have not been resolved, including intellectually, that’s all i wanted to say on this issue, now the second question, regarding foreign affairs, well from my point of view, uh, i don’t know if it’s just a financial order, so... but it’s definitely a order, yes, aimed at confirming one thesis, some people here say that everything is lost, but no, that’s it no, not everything is lost, that’s the pathos of this article, it’s in the statement

this thesis is quite helpless, well, if you analyze it all, so to speak, according to the material, but it is important that it appears, yes, foreign affairs appear. which says very bad about foreign affairs already the name new york communist is becoming even, well, redundant for the washington washington i'm sorry, i didn't want to offend your charges, that means the washington communist is already this is even becoming redundant because the article is very helpless and why, well, it arises and because well ...

if you take this seriously, then from this thesis follows directly that they will stop at nothing, and this is so, including the use of nuclear weapons, absolutely, because if you don’t take this text seriously, then to hell with it, yes, but if at least for a second to say that he said what he thinks,

they don’t have, which they don’t have, and we don’t notice those that we abandoned in the process of our, our cultural development, we abandoned a lot, but kept a lot, you know , but we have preserved our conscience as an institution, by the way, this is interesting,

you see, but in soviet times the category of conscience was very important, it did not disappear anywhere, despite the fact that there was atheism and so on, the category.

in situations in which you need to be frank, in this sense, he should say it, they will all say it, who will be in their political seats in the near future, they don’t understand, they don’t understand what the problem is, like this, they think what they say, they will all say that we have an existential war for our right to own the world, this will be said in plain text and will be accepted, that’s what will happen next in this part, well, this is the time of revelation about mus. in general, i think that everything is great, because to raise, after everything that

has played out, to raise the question of some legitimacy of musa, as such, is pointless, inappropriate, you want to look like an idiot, defending the legitimacy of this court, after all, by the way, in in principle, when the prosecutor said that a politician from one country called him and said this, all the countries that signed... should now establish a commission, interrogate him, find out who this politician is, who exerted pressure, well, the court, established by an international coalition of states, so everything is fine here, continue further, if you allow, i will not talk about social structures, about representation, because from my point of view it is too early to talk about this, the process of formation is underway, so to speak.

we trust you to be in power, you will serve us, absolutely, but to this power , humanity comes to this in absolutely pure forms, when everything superficial goes away, well , in my opinion, i can be, well, i apologize, hitler also came with agenda, which suited the germans, it was no coincidence that they did not vote.

after november 5, it may run into them, but it is coming, and other countries must, we must take this into account, so when we talk now about nuclear weapons, this is where it actually began, yes, this is a serious warning, i don’t really believe in the fact that this is a war, it’s just around the corner, as they say, for one simple reason,

because they expect that everything that is launched now did not work in 2024.

2 hours, but they will fly because otherwise , it is practically impossible to assess, so to speak, the situation at the front, by the way, when the americans published a report, so i...

for example, it was destroyed more than once that the ship is considered territory, well, iran sank their ship a nuclear war began, because there were casualties and

american, military ships, no, directly, they captured, they took, humiliated, publicly filmed, they showed there, well, this can be applied to the united states in relation to iran, by the way, according to towards iradu operates the most ancient emergence, the oldest emergence.

i’m finishing, the simple fact is that right now the united states really wants, in legal, political and diplomatic terms, to shift this onto the europeans, and what’s more, for the europeans... we can fuck with nuclear weapons, yes, when they shift it, when they shift it, please , that is, maybe they don’t have it, ugh, okay, well, they have a little bit, but it doesn’t count, no, they don’t have it, they only have it, well, they’re

not europeans anymore, by the way, new colidons leave the french alone, i’m just talking about this international criminal court, i think it needs to be sharpened, so to speak, and strengthened, because the court itself is not important, what kind of structure is there, good, bad, and so on, what happened said. fell in love with each other at the beginning of the 20th century, so to speak, and became this democratic party, which today calls itself the vilsanians in foreign policy, but

if you think that such...

it just laughed with a cheerful laugh and then it sponsored at the dinner: who will be to vote for donald trump, she called this basket of deplorables, that is, a basket of garbage, with worthless people, in fact, it’s even more offensive, so to speak, if in the american religious tradition, these are simply, well, unsaveable people. 2017, the event in charlotteswell, the clash of the march of the united right with the leftists, listen,

on both sides there would be... people with whom i would not want to stand next to, but some, exclusively ours, are warriors of light, and others, of course, nazis for trump, racists for trump there and so on, although in fact in such a division there was real racism and there was real anglo-saxon liberal racism, because you cannot judge trump supporters and these by the same criteria, when they said the same phrase, there can be no moral equivalence .

this is where to get a job then, i’ll say it again, it’s not even based on skin color, but they now have an informal leader, barack obama, what kind of racism is there, it’s kind of black and white, it’s all funny, because they should somehow explain to yourself what they are this very elite, which can do much more than others, and hence all this indoctrination by evil, hence all these pedophile parties, so to speak, it’s clear from epstein himself. who flew this plane to the island, hence the constant propaganda of all these very unconventional things, because well, we can do it or we do it as we want, and we will ban anything, actually for good reason, this also manifested itself in the situation with netanyahu, from netanyahu, by and large , what mistake did the functionaries specifically make? mus, they believed that the mood of the gentlemen was that this liberal establishment wanted

to get rid of netanyahu. why this reaction? because some kind of mongrel opened his mouth, we will decide how we will remove it, what the procedure is, moreover, you are both hamas and these, you understand what you said, you said that the olympian god is equal , here’s a peasant, sing up, you actually understood that you understood that death is the punishment for this in our society, then he comes out and says: i liked it. that's the funniest french thing, no a normal idea, normal in belgium too, by the way, this is this indoctrination and belonging to this very elite, that liberals can do what all other pigs cannot, due to this they captured hollywood in america, they captured education all over the world, we with great difficulty, step by step today we are winning our education back from them here, because they did what they wanted, and in reality it was so.