the events of today are similar to the events of days long past, look, compare the logic of another quote from adolf hitler. when assessing such actions, it must be taken into account that the defeat in 1918, the subsequent period of suffering of the german people, as well as the struggle against national socialism, which required countless ... bloody victims, were the result of bolshevik influence, which not a single german has forgotten, that is hitler blames the bolsheviks for all the troubles of the german people, who cares about us, and now listen to what zelensky says 80 years later, because torture, because security is the number one issue today. do you see explosions in europe?

hands arise in general in this whole situation, for example, recently in the city of rivne one of the few remaining monuments in honor of the victory over hitler’s germany was demolished, it was called the monument of eternal glory, look, while they are moving and laughing, they are breaking this monument, they promise metal, from which this monument was made, used for the needs of the sssu, that is, in other words, here from this monument, which... was erected in

honor of the victory of our common victory over germany, bullets can be cast that will kill the descendants of the winners of this war, their own, their own, just imagine the ominousness of this situation, but unfortunately, the trouble the fact is that we ourselves give the reason with our own hands and actions. for distortion and distortion of real history, take at least the katyn case, i want to remind you that in 1943 the german ministry of propaganda under the leadership of goebbels reported that in the katyn forest a mass grave of polish officers was found in the smolensk region, and the ussr is to blame for this, that is. a country with which

germany waged a fierce war. by the way, the germans took all the documents to germany, when the red army began to approach, they simply burned them. by the end of the forty-third year, smolensk was liberated, and a commission led by academician nikolai burdenko began investigating. while hiding these burials , german bullets were found. in addition, letters that were written after the arrival of the germans. the commission concluded that the dead were prisoners who did not have time to be evacuated during the retreat; they ended up in territory occupied by the germans and were shot by the nazis. the katyn massacre appears in the indictment of the international tribunal in nuremberg. section three. military. the crime goes like this: in

september 1941, in the katyn forest near smolensk, the nazis carried out mass murders of polish captured officers. well, in principle, we could put an end to this. but then the nineties come and 13 april 1990, the president of the soviet union, mikhail gorbachev, passes it to the newcomer.

writes in his letter to the prosecutor's office of the russian federation on march 11, 2024, state duma deputy anatoly wasserman now. the katyn case gives rise to a legal conflict. the fact is that article 354, paragraph 1, has been introduced into the current criminal code of russia. rehabilitation of nazism. in accordance with it, denial of the facts established by the verdict of the international military tribunal for the trial of punishment of the main war criminals of european countries are considered a crime. entail criminal prosecution, that is, when we declared in the eighties and nineties that polish officers were killed by the nkvd, despite the facts and documents, the evidence of the burdenko commission, we ourselves become

participants in the rehabilitation of nazism, it turns out, this is one of the most important documents that it seems to claim and confirm... dated march 5, 1940, interestingly, all four pages were printed on different typewriters, which alone casts doubt on the authenticity of this document. in addition, stalin's signature is on the title page. varoshilov, molotov and mikayan, and these signatures were made with a pencil of the same color. it was this letter, along with other documents, that boris yeltsin handed over to the constitutional court, which also refused to accept them as genuine documents.

listen to what deputy viktor elyukhin says about this. on may 25, 2010, he called me by phone. an unknown man and stated that he was aware that a group of scientists, together with me, was conducting a study of the circumstances surrounding execution of polish officers. stated that he participated in a large group of specialists specializing in falsifying historical documents, including he stated that he and his team directly falsified, if his statements are to be believed, the so-called note of beria dated march 1940, he put the signature of beria on this note, at the same time on this note on behalf of stalin, on behalf of molotov, malenkov their other names were entered, in particular

, he stated that he prepared this note according to the proposal that followed from the kremlin is here. making stalin’s signature, making beria’s signature, as he said, it’s enough to smear it with a certain, a certain liquid coating and put it on the necessary documents and a signature that is unlikely to be distinguished by any criminologist. but this is very interesting, this is what a member of the cpsu politburo, alexander yakovlev, who organized this falsification campaign in the nineties, says. i had to partially lie, be a hypocrite, dissemble, there was no other way it was true that we had to break the totalitarian communist party, but it was precisely our behavior that led to the world’s complete impunity towards us,

towards our rights, towards our claims, towards our interests, which we confirmed with our own hands. this most talented operation of goebbels, which we are still discussing, and which created such discord between the poles and russians, and look how well thought out it was, jesuitically subtle, even the forest in which the polish officers were shot, was renamed, never before had this forest been called the katyn forest, it was the gnezdovo forest, and the place itself was called koziigu.

and the fake city of bucha, why not gostomel or irpen, why bucha? because the president of the united states is in another bout of dementia. personally called our president a butcher, in english butcher butcher. do you understand the meaning, how it can be played out, rhymed, butcher, butchers, murderers? and so on, this is all, this is the most powerful propaganda machine

that has fallen on us, and the world one at that very serious people work there. how does modern goebbels work today? look, this is the film 20 days in mariupol, shot by ukrainian director mstislav chernov. by the way, it won an oscar for best feature-length documentary. i want all this to stop, but it's not in my power. after watching the so-called documentary film by the ukrainian director who won an oscar, i, like many of my colleagues, had a feeling.

they are destroying our children, look, there are only toys here, but what then on that day happened? from that side, from ukraine, hail shells arrived and exploded in the apartment. the bulaev family lived on the eighth floor, it’s very difficult to talk now, because small children died, i also have children, that’s why. you remember this

moment, of course, this is sofia’s jacket, which was hanging on a tree, of course i remember, because when they were looking for it, then naturally, everything, everything that was possible, well, everything, everything was naturally thrown down, because it was immediately they didn’t find her, they looked for her. and here they hung, except for things children's, there were also children's toys hanging, absurdity, people probably don't fear god, we all walk under god, we're not afraid of sin, how can you use such things for some selfish purposes, that is, you understand, everything is for sale, everything goes into the piggy bank, everything into this cauldron of lies, manipulation, use... of some shots with an absolutely opposite meaning, with

the ability to falsify people’s words, rephrase them, and so on and so forth, this is the complete absence of the concept of the sin of shame. we remember this time, the nineties, but today this is not happening in just one country, it is chaos and lies happening at the global level.

ivan ilyan, a bit, no less, a fascist. the scientific center of one of the leading universities in the country , the winner of fascism, cannot bear the name of a supporter of ultra-legal views, taking into account the socio-political situation in which the russian federation currently finds itself. we are convinced that ivan ilyin’s worldview has nothing in common with the values ​​of russia, and the fascist idea

is unnatural for us political construct. our demand is to cancel the resolution on the creation of an educational institution.

she became a prominent political scientist, became a member of the russian public chamber from 2012 to 2020, shortly after the start of the svo, she suddenly disappeared from public political life. there is an assumption that she went back abroad. she is a supporter of the democratic party, loves joe biden and, by and large, if we speak seriously, she does the simplest and most clear things.

against a president who often or otherwise quotes, and what is a president who quotes the fascist, how is this, how can one come to terms with this, this is a subtle and long-term game, it all works in this piggy bank, the humiliation of great people, the humiliation of those who truly sincerely and completely loved russia, despite the fact that the trick ... of such information is that it is disseminated not only in foreign agency sources, it is also picked up by patriotic media. by the way, for mrs. krosheninnikova’s understanding, a fascist is anyone who preaches conservative views, who is anti-lgbtq, or who

promotes christian morality. here's what she writes: gays, new jews. the study of lgbt people in the world belongs to the agenda of far-right forces, and so on, now pay attention to this subtle but important detail: this whole story revolves around the highest political school named after ilyin, led by the philosopher alexander dugin, and this is happening precisely at the time when mr. dugin, together with other deputies, are writing a statement.

our film "russian philosopher ivan ilyin". i opened ilyin when i got my hands on a handwritten brochure about russia, from which, in general, in my opinion, one of his most important works, i was absolutely speechless, it’s just that when i looked later, i looked ahead, when this was written, i, when i i saw that this was written in the fifties. in my opinion, the first or second year, and when the country was on a huge upswing, they won the war, yes, all the repressions, but still... for the world it is a country of winners, suddenly this person writes about what awaits it when bolshevism comes about the fall of bolshevism in general, it can be said that he predicted

the future of the ussr after the war, when, as he wrote, bolshevism would collapse, with such tragic precision that one gets the feeling that a person in the fifty- first year could not write such a thing: this is what he writes then: the russian people will come out of the revolution a beggar, there will be no rich, no prosperous, no middle class, or even a healthy economic peasant

at all. poor peasantry, poor worker in industry, poor artisan, poor city dwellers, these will be the people of a classless society, robbed, but by no means forgotten neither the fact that he was robbed, nor what exactly was taken from him, nor those who... expropriated him, everyone will be poor, overworked and embittered. the state center, which robbed everyone, will disappear, but the state coinage, inherited by the heir, will have minimal purchasing power on the international market; it projects everything that happens in russia in advance, when what happened to us happens. i ask myself the question, why don’t we read this, why do the people who undertake to lead the country me in it, the climate, the authorities,

applying new laws, approving the new constitution, why don’t they read this, why don’t they want to believe those who really saved russia in the idea of ​​it? ilyana, its scale. i want to give you one quote. from the article the basis of the struggle for national russia. it was written,

be careful, in 1938. listen carefully. ukrainian separatism is an artificial phenomenon, devoid of real foundations. it arose from the ambition of leaders and international intrigue of conquest. the little russians are a branch of a single slavic-russian people, this branch has no reason to quarrel with other branches of the same people and secede into a separate state, having separated, this state betrays itself to be conquered and plundered by foreigners, trees and sticks, thirty-eighth year, level of thinking this man, his caliber, whom mrs. korsheninnikova calls a fascist. but

i’ll give you another short excerpt from a letter from this fascist on october 13, 1938, which ivan ilyin wrote from switzerland to the writer ivan shmevo. published from russia. the persecution of me in germany began back in 1933 because i dared to be a russian patriot by my own judgment. here's the list. 1933. april-july, the first visit to my home by the political police, attempts to expose me as a francophile or to use me against the rest of the immigration. my refusal. 1934, april, a proposal to me, as a professor at a russian scientific institute, to engage in propaganda of anti-semitism throughout

the emigration dispersion. my categorical refusal. 1934 june i was denied the right to work. july 1934, i was fired from the russian institute in no time. the attack on me will continue. the propaganda ministry declared me to the exposed freemasons and my public speeches unacceptable for the lack of anti-semitism in them, for the conduct carried out in them. christian point of view, an attempt will be made to use my forces in preparing a campaign against russia, 1938 , early july, i am leaving germany completely, i would suffocate with disgust, the black hundreds mobilized there, with by attracting a number of notorious german agents who led the persecution against me, this is written by a fascist, well, honestly, guys,

did he support the black hundreds, no, he rejoiced at hitler’s war with the soviet union, no, back in september of forty-one, ilyin wrote: germany lost this war. moreover, he quickly got rid of illusions and understood nazism back in 1934, unlike so many. yes, to be fair, he really did not accept bolshevism, but he did not cheat. he didn’t seem like anyone, he didn’t try to fit in, he was a convinced anti-communist and was expelled for this, and he was not alone, i will quote the words of the writer, doctor of philosophy, deputy chairman of the izborsk club, vitaly vladimirovich averyanov, this is what he writes: according to the testimony of the historian olga bonch osmalovskaya, out of several hundred students, almost no

one counted ilyin, with the exception of five. a person, and even then, as one can guess, they read or otherwise not on the scale of a large book, on the scale of several articles that were carefully slipped to the student by those who did all this organized. how does this even connect? like this, to vilify indiscriminately, without really knowing and without truly knowing, the long -dead great philosopher ivan ilyan and... at the same time, today, today in the higher school of economics, the ideas of one of the most anti-soviet and anti-russian nts organizations are in the air . this is alexander sungurov, professor of political science, higher school of economics in st. petersburg. in 1993 he established the commonwealth fund in st. petersburg.

subsequently. strategy center, the work of his center was paid from funds macarthur, nauman, bell, ebert, rosa luxemburg and others. the adenaur foundation is under the christian democrats, and the ebert foundation is under the social democrats, the naumma foundation is under the free democrats, there is a fund under roseluxembourg, and also - these are the greens and they all work, what do they do, they hold seminars, for what money i will go to...

is, uh, this very thing, not a succession, but what i call an expression for this, this concept, yes, no, perhaps, it is possible to say, it is perfectly understandable, but according to the legal norm this is annexation, and that the action of the nazis were more legitimate than the actions of the bolsheviks, then the league of nations,