which did not prove anything, but this is presented as a package of documents confirming that polish officers were executed by soviet security officers. this is what state duma deputy anatoly wasserman writes in his letter to the prosecutor’s office of the russian federation on march 11, 2024. the current status of the katyn case gives rise to a legal... conflict, the fact is that article 354, paragraph 1, has been introduced into the current criminal code of russia. rehabilitation of nazism, in accordance with it, denial of the facts established by the verdict international military tribunal for trial , the punishment of the main war criminals of european countries is considered a crime entailing criminal prosecution, that is:

dated march 5, 1940, interestingly, all four pages were typed on different typewriters, which alone casts doubt on the authenticity of this document, in addition, on the title page, the signatures of stalin, molotov and mikayan, all of these were written

in the same color pencil, it was this letter, along with other documents, that boris yeltsin handed over to the constitutional court, which also refused to accept them as genuine documents. listen to what deputy viktor elyukhin says about this. on may 25 , 2010 , an unknown man called me on the phone and stated that he knew... that a group of scientists, together with me, was conducting a study of the circumstances surrounding the execution of polish officers, stated that he participated in a large group of specialists , specializing in the forgery of historical documents, including his statement that he and his team directly falsified, if you believe his statements, the so-called note of beria from 1900...

after all, there was no other way, we had to break the totalitarian communist party, but it was precisely our behavior that led to the complete impunity of the world in relation to us, in relation to our rights, to our claims, to our interests, we with our own hands confirmed this most talented operation of goebbels, which...

the word katyn was drawn to this story, because in polish kat is an executioner, was n’t this the method by which the city was chosen?

the most powerful attack of the entire propaganda machine that has fallen on us, and very serious people work there at the world level. how does modern goebbels work today? look, this is the film 20 days in mariupol, shot by ukrainian director mstislav chernov. the film, by the way, received an oscar for best.

a pink jacket, and it seemed very familiar to us; after digging through the archives, we found that same frame, but it had nothing to do with the title of the documentary film 20 days in mariupol. in fact the photo was taken by another journalist who captured the death of an entire family in the city of gorlovka in the dpr. they are destroying our children, look. toys, what happened that day? from that side, from the side of ukraine, hail shells arrived and exploded in the apartment, the bulaev family lived on the eighth floor, it’s very difficult to talk now,

because small children died, i also have children, that’s why. you remember this moment, of course, this is sofia’s jacket, which was hanging on the tree, of course i remember, because when they were looking for her, then naturally, everything, everything, that it was possible, well, everything, everything was naturally thrown down, because they didn’t find her right away, they were looking for her, and here, in addition to children’s things, there were also hanging... children’s toys, absurdity, people probably don’t fear god, we we all walk under god, we are not afraid of sin, how can you use such things for some selfish purposes, that is, you understand,

everything is for sale, everything is in the piggy bank, everything is in this cauldron of lies, manipulation, the use of only frames with absolutely meaning . any fact can turn to its advantage, and there are different forms of crimes, there are obvious crimes, yes, but there are invisible ones, there are, not only are they invisible, they are also far-reaching, for example, the story that has now flared up regarding

the great russian philosopher ivan ilyan, in early april of this year a rather powerful campaign was launched, i think that it became absolutely clear to thinking people that this is not a speech against ilyin, in fact, this is a speech against our president, who quite often quotes this great philosopher, it all started with the fact that the students were allegedly outraged by the fact that the higher school is named after the fascist ivan ilyan, a little bit. the scientific center, one of the leading universities in the country, the winner of fascism, cannot bear the name of a supporter

of ultra-legal views, taking into account the socio-political situation in which the russian federation currently finds itself. we are convinced that ivan ilyin’s worldview has nothing in common with the values ​​of russia, and the fascist idea is an unnatural political construct for us. our demand is to cancel the resolution on the creation of educational and scientific center under the leadership of alexander dugin. we. we stand for free education from the ideas of fascism, no to fascism, no to fascism in russia, look what we see, fiery fighters, patriots, young guys who are going to a rally under the general sign of down with fascism, how can you argue with that, of course down with fascism , only fascists. they call completely different people, one of the first who began this work of denigrating

the image of elena, this is a certain veronika krosheninnikova, by the way, she even worked at one time in the russian state humanities university, from the age of 20 she lived abroad, studied, worked there, appeared in russia only about 10 years ago, she became a prominent political scientist, became a member of the public.

quotes, and what is a president who quotes a fascist, how is it, how can one come to terms with it, this is a subtle and long-term game, it all works in this piggy bank, humiliation of great people, humiliation of those who are truly sincere and to the end loved russia, despite the fact that the trick of such information is that it...

dugin, and this is happening precisely at the time when mr. dugin, together with other deputies, are writing a statement to the investigative committee, accusing the biden family.

i opened ilyan when i came across a handwritten brochure about russia, then why in general. in my opinion, one of his most important works, i was absolutely speechless, just when i looked later, i looked at the period when this was written, and i, when i saw that it was written in fifty there, in my opinion first or second year, and when the country was on a huge upswing and won war, yes, repressions are everything, but still for

the world it is a country of victors, suddenly this... man writes about what awaits it when bolshevism falls, what kind of fall of bolshevism can we talk about in general, when he predicted the future of the ussr after war, when, as he wrote, bolshevism would collapse, with such tragic precision that one gets the feeling that a person in 1951 could not write such, say, a brochure about russia, in which we...

revolution beggars, nor rich, neither prosperous, nor middle class, nor even healthy there will be no economic peasant at all, a poor peasantry, a poor worker in industry, a poor artisan, a poor city dweller, it will be the people of a classless society, robbed, but in no way forgetting that they were robbed, nor what exactly was taken from them, not those who expropriated him will all be poor. overworked and embittered, the state center that robbed everyone will disappear, but the state coinage inherited by the heir will have minimal purchasing power on the international market, he projects everything that happens in russia in advance, then, when what happened to us happens, i

ask myself the question, why don’t we read this? why do people who undertake to lead the country, change the climate, the government, apply new laws, approve a new constitution, why don’t they read this, why don’t they want to believe those who really saved russia, in the idea of ​​it, saved the memory of it , saved her...

i want to give you one quote from the article on the basis of the struggle for national russia. it was written, be careful, in 1938 year. listen carefully. ukrainian separatism is an artificial phenomenon, devoid of real foundations. it arose from the ambition of leaders and international intrigue of conquest. little russians are the essence of branches of a single slavic russia. people, this branch has no reason to quarrel with other branches of the same people and secede into a separate state, having separated, it is a state of itself for conquest and plunder by foreigners, fir-trees, 38, you

understand, the level... the thinking of this person, its scale, which mrs. calls kasheninnikov a fascist, here i will give you another short excerpt from a letter from this fascist, october 13, 1938, which ivan ilyin wrote from switzerland to the writer ivan shmilyov, also exiled from russia, the persecution of... me in germany began back in 1933 for that i dared to be a russian patriot by my own judgment, here is a list of 1933. april-july, the first visit to my home by the political police, attempts to expose me as a francophile, or to use me against the rest of the immigration,

my refusal. 1934, april, proposal to me, as a professor at a russian scientific institute, to engage in propaganda of anti-semitism throughout the immigration dispersion, my categorical refusal. 1900... july i was fired from the russian institute in no time. the attack on me will continue. the propaganda ministry declared me an exposed freemason, and my public speeches unacceptable for the lack of anti-semitism in them, for the christian point of view held in them. an attempt will be made to... use my forces in preparing a campaign against russia. 1938 it's the beginning of july, i'm leaving germany completely. i would have suffocated with disgust at

the black hundreds mobilized there with the involvement of a number of notorious german agents who led the persecution against me. is this written by a fascist? well, honestly, guys, did he really support the black hundreds? no, he made me happy. in hitler's war with the soviet union? no. back in september 1941, ilyin wrote: germany lost this war. moreover, he quickly got rid of the illusions of understanding nazism back in 304, unlike so many. yes, to be fair, he really didn’t accepted bolshevism, but he didn’t play court, he wasn’t him, he didn’t seem like anyone, he didn’t try to fit in. he was a convinced mandi-communist and for this he was expelled, and he was not alone. i will quote the words of the writer, doctor of philosophy, deputy chairman

of the izborsk club vitaly vladimirovich overyanov. this is what he writes: but according to the testimony of historian olga bonch osmalovskaya, out of several hundred students, almost no one except five or six people read, and even then, as you can guess, they read. school of economics are floating around the idea of ​​one of the most anti-soviet and anti-russian nts organizations. this is alexander sungurov, professor

of political science at the higher school of economics in st. petersburg. in 1993 he established the commonwealth fund in st. petersburg. subsequently the center of strategy. the work of his center was paid. from the funds of the macarthur, naumman, bell, ebert, rosa luxemburg and others foundations. the adenaur foundation is under the christian democrats, and the ebert foundation is under the social democrats, the naumman foundation is under the free democrats, there is prirosaluksenburg, the fund and someone else, the ballot is green and they are all work, what they do, they conduct seminars, how much money will i pay to travel to the regions, travel, hotel. that in another 10-15 years,

this scares me most of all, the people will want putin again and he will appear. we spent 3 days leading up to this conference on the intersection of politics and law, we touched upon, well, we didn’t talk about what putin gave, understandably, because there were smart people, but for everything else the discussion was very serious, because one of...

not bad it would be nice to know that it was vladimir ilyevich lenin who saved ivan ilyin, he saved ilyin from execution, he personally gave him a boarding pass for the philosophical ship, you know, in what words, he said: it’s impossible, he is the author of the best book about hegel.

maxim fadeev's cranes, please listen, and the smoke will melt, i will see the silence of the fields, the stotras howl, about my friends who did not return, who knew that everything

would be like this, after those... battles, that not everyone will come home , and they will hug the mother, that not everyone can love and see the daughter, that not everyone can stand up from the trench, given by god, i want to say, and i want to finish singing this to the mother, you forgive us, your sons, the cranes that have not returned, just like we are all flying home, and you just wait for me! i know we will meet, but the dark night

is falling, where are my cranes, the wind is still humming, as if he is crying, he is like me alone, the stars are falling, separating us. anyway, you wait, when the fire is behind me, in my heart you are alone, i know in advance, all your love lives for me in the mountains, just like we all fly home, and you...

just wait for me, i know we’ll meet, but it’s dark it's night, where are my cranes? i know we’ll meet, but it’s a dark night for you, where is my cranes, where are mine?