you are a great audience, bye everyone, you owe the bank, you still owe the bank, i have already ordered a rosbankrupt anti-credit card from valders on yandex market. one of my friends walked into the wrong area. yes, i’m getting used to the role here, i’ll be there soon. uh, boy, do you have any, should i call? yes, i myself have zero account. what if i find it? but he will find it. you have a megaphone, you can call via messengers even without money. megapower communication at zero is already included in the tariff for free. our subscribers will not be left without communication. and remember, he is on a megaphone, he has mega power. call me if you need me.

the word of a megaphone, what you need to travel, a road to where there are no roads, loved ones to go further, calculation to improvise, time to forget about it, technology to take a break from civilization and a lot of space for photographs. the tour is designed for travel. only at alfabank. spin the reel in the app and get a superkick up to 100% every month. and up to 30% in categories is guaranteed. if you don't have a card, order a free alpha debit card. not just

profitable, alpha profitable! thanks to shopping at the megamarket, someone will reach the finish line first, someone will create comfort in their apartment, someone will go on a long-awaited vacation, sellers at the megamarket are changing the world, megamarket, just grow with us! are you afraid of missing out on a discount on an apartment? don't blink? no, download the cian app and be the first to know about reduced prices for apartments.

who will buy it, but you didn’t listen, because you ’re doing everything wrong, continue, send all payments and transfers without commission, open an account for... the best bank for business. green marathon sber organized a big sports festival today on children's day. the charity marathon took place in sixty cities of russia, including moscow. children and adults ran various distances, from 400 m to 42 km. registration of participants was paid by all means.

which we heard, the movement of russian troops into eastern ukraine in february twenty- two was not provoked, here is a selection of what we know about it: the russian army carried out a brutal attack on the people of ukraine, without provocation, without justification, without

necessity. this is a deliberate attack. from the provoked and brutal invasion of russia activated countries around the world. unprovoked. russia's unjustified attack on ukraine, russia launched an unprovoked war of aggression against ukraine. this unprovoked russian war of aggression must be countered with force. vladimir putin decided to start this unprovoked war. so, the war was not provoked? we've heard this many times. i even asked my research assistant to do the math. how many times have we heard this in the new york times in the first year from february 22 to february 23. the word unprovoked occurs there 26 times. this is a trick of a lazy

person trying to think about what is happening. and this is very dangerous because it is wrong. “we are going to pull ukraine over to our side and go straight to its border with russia at 2100 km, and we will place our troops there, maybe missiles, whatever we want, because we are the only superpower and we do what we want and in fact it all started

a long time ago , 170 years ago, this idea first came from the british, encircle russia in the black sea region and russia." more of a small power, that was the idea of ​​the lord palmerston during the crimean war of 1853-1856, the british essentially taught us what we know about empire, they essentially taught us, russia, it needs, it needs access to the middle east, the mediterranean, if you surround russia in black sea, you are turning it into a second or third class country. and sbignev rzezinski, one of our leading geostrategists of our time, wrote in 1997: let's do this, let's make sure that russia is surrounded in the black sea region. they

had an idea: we will expand nato so that every black sea country around russia will become a country. right now, that is, then turkey was a nato country, but we said, “okay, we'll get romania and bulgaria, and we 'll get ukraine, we'll get georgia.” i don’t mean our state of georgia with the city of atlanta, but the black sea country. we used to call it soviet georgia. yes, soviet georgia, if you like, is the birthplace of stalin. this, this, this is not the north atlantic, nato, this is far on the eastern edge of the black sea region. look at the map, but we said, yes, we will also make georgia part of nato, and the reason was very clear and izbignev stated very clearly that this is our way to actually dominate eurasia. if we dominate the black sea region, then russia is nothing.

if we reduce russia to nothing, then we can effectively control eurasia, that is, all the way from europe to central asia, through our influence. nazis do the same there, and this is american unipolarity, we rule the world, we are the hegemon, we are the only superpower without rivals, is that the idea? why do they need it, why do the british need it, why the us state department wants this, and why are they so threatened by russia, which is not really an expansionist power? it's not about russia, it's about the usa, but this happened in britain, i think it's a bit like the old game of risk, i don't know if you played it for me when i was a kid? the point of the game is to grab your piece anywhere in the world, that’s the point. read american strategists, be it sbigniew brzezinski, although he was very

moderate, or the neocons who have been leading us foreign policy for the last 30 years, neocons are very outspoken, the us should be the undisputed superpower. we must dominate anywhere in the world, in every region; for us americans, this is a big burden.

europe and the usa said, we don’t hear you, we don’t hear you, we do what we want. in the nineties, when there was a debate in the us government, should nato continue to expand? some people said yes, but we told gorbachev and yeltsin that we were not going to expand. yeah, okay, the soviet union is over, we can do, whatever we want, we are the only superpower. clinton bought it. i bent this line.

so this is not frivolous at all, this is the years we will propose to ukraine to become part of nato, a long-term plan based on a long-term geostrategy. and so the russians say, you ’re kidding, we wanted peace. "we ended the cold war, you didn't just defeat us, we

said enough is enough, we dissolved the warsaw pact, we wanted peace, we wanted cooperation, you call that a victory, we just wanted to cooperate, i know this for sure because i was there in those years that i wanted gorbachev, what yeltsin wanted, they didn’t want a war with the united states and they didn’t say that they were defeated, they said, we just want to cooperate, we want to stop the cold war. “we want to become part of the world economy, to be a normal economy, a normal society, connected with you, connected with europe, with asia, and the united states said: “we understand, we understand, we won, you do everything we say, and we decide how everything will go further. so, at the beginning of the 2000s, putin comes .” first of all, putin wanted to establish good things . cooperation with europe. in the early 2000s, again, i know people, i watched carefully. i was a participant in some events, putin was absolutely pro-european and, by the way, pro-american, i

know, and we don’t want to talk about it, we don’t want to admit it, we only know that to repeat it without being provoked. so, everything we say is false, everything is a lie, but let's just say that the united states continued to take unilateral actions that were truly outrageous. in 1999 we bombed belgrade for 78 days, a bad move, definitely, we bombed the european capital for 78 days. "we are the new state of kosovo, where we would like to force serbia to come to terms with the creation of the largest nato military base in southeastern europe. we placed a base there because we needed it in southeastern europe. the akons did not like serbia. serbia is close to russia.

it doesn’t matter, we are the only superpower, we do what we want.”

nuclear situation, which is incredibly dangerous, and the us unilaterally began to place missiles, first in poland, then in romania, and the russians say: wait, what do we know about these missiles a few minutes from moscow, this will completely destabilize the situation, you don’t want to talk to us, then 2004 comes , seven more countries, latvia, lithuania, join nato. estonia, romania, bulgaria, slovakia and slovenia. and the filling of black mine, romania and bulgaria begins. suddenly, there are now the countries of the north atlantic, but this is all part of the plan, everything is spelled out, everything is completely clear, we are surrounding russia. in 2007, president putin gave

a very clear speech at the munich security conference. very powerful, very correct. where he said with disappointment: gentlemen, you promised us in 1990 that nato would never expand, this was a promise to president gorbachev, and this was a promise to president yeltsin, and you deceived us, and you deceived us repeatedly, and you do not even recognize his promise, but, by the way, it is clearly documented, and as you know,

stop, in 2008, bill burns very insightfully and articulately conveyed to candalisa rice and the white house the following: ukraine is really a red line, not do this, it’s not just putin, it’s not just putin’s government, the entire political class of russia is against it, and just to make it easier for all of us to think about this, imagine mexico. stated, we think it would be great to have chinese military bases on the ria grande, we don't understand why the us would have a problem with that.

merkel, the president of france, they all asked, george, don't do this, don't do this, this is extremely dangerous, this is a real provocation,

in fact we don't need and we don't want nato right up to the border with russia, they pressed, pressed, pressed, in fact this is an american alliance, they made a commitment that ukraine will become a member of nato. the trick was: okay, right now we... because in those days the us and russia were meeting as part of the partnership program, even then putin was there the next day in bucharest and said: don't do this, this is completely reckless. essentially, this is our fundamental red line, don't do this. so, another thing doesn't go according to plan. what's going wrong? ukrainians don't want nato expansion. ukrainians don’t want this, they are against it. public opinion said: no, this is very dangerous, neutrality

is safer, we are between east and west, we don’t want this. and they elect viktor yanukovych, a president who says, "we 'll just be neutral." and for the usa this is absolutely unacceptable. oh, what the hell is this, ukraine, they have that... of course, as the us always works, we have to get rid of this guy, maybe then we will choose his opponent, maybe we will catch him in a crisis moment and so on , and indeed, at the end of 2013, the us certainly sparks a crisis that develops into an uprising and then a coup, i know.

with you, victoria was known to hand out cookies, but i can tell you that it was much more serious than just cookies. so the us conspired with the ukrainian rights to overthrow yanukovych, in the third week of february 2014 there was a violent overthrow, that's when the war began. putin's understanding is absolutely correct. the moment was this: i will not allow nato will take over my navy and my naval base in crimea. are you joking?

the russian naval base at sevastopol on the black sea, which was the target of the crimean war and is in its own way a target of that war, has been there since 1783. and now putin says: oh, nato is going to go in there. well, no, so they organize this referendum, this is a russian region with overwhelming support from russia, thank you, we will stay with russia, and not with this new government after the coup. unrest breaks out in the eastern regions, which are ethnically russian provinces of donbass, donbass, lugansk and donetsk. and a year later the russians very wisely declare. in fact,... we don't want this war, we don't want to own ukraine, we don't want problems on our border, we would like peace

based on... respect for the ethnic russians in the east and political autonomy, because you , the coup government, tried to completely ban the russian language, culture and rights of these people after they carried out a violent coup, and we do not accept this, the result of this was two agreements called minsk-1 and minsk-2. the minsk-2 agreement was supported by the council...

so how did the us react to it? us government? the us government's position was to tell the ukrainians: don't worry about it. come on, don't worry, we don't want ukraine to be weakened, we want nato to be in a united ukraine. don't go for decentralization. we convince them to abandon the agreement they signed. and we are tearing down the minsk agreements. in fact angela merkel explained this in a rather shocking way the candor of an interview she gave last year. when asked why germany did not help enforce the minsk agreements, since germany and france were guarantors of the minsk agreements as part of the so-called normandy process, she replied: well, we just thought it should give the ukrainians some time to

build up their strength. others.

be close to the russian border, so we will play out until the third world war, no, jeff, don’t worry, there won’t be any war, there won’t be a war, don’t worry, we have a diplomatic approach, i told jake, this is the basis of diplomacy, negotiations. well, the formal answer from the united states is that issues relating to nato are not negotiable, they exist. only between

nato countries and nato candidates. the third party has no interest or say here. russia is completely unimportant . again by analogy. if mexico and china want to place chinese military bases on the ria grande, the united states has no right to interfere. and no interest. and this was the formal us response in january 2022. so, unprovoked, not really. 30 years of provocation when we could not accept peace as an answer for a minute. whatever we can accept, we will do whatever we want, wherever we want and no one has a say in the matter. so, if you go back to the beginning of 2000,

putin said.