corresponding, and it is constantly, it is constantly being implemented, so if, say, last year our level of output by enterprises of the military-industrial complex, the level of output of civilian products was somewhere around 25 and a little 25.1%, in my opinion 2 2 then - the year before last in twenty-two, then last year it was already almost 30%, 29. with a tail, so this process is constantly going on with us, and of course we must definitely think about ensuring that our military spending meets the needs today's level development of our economy, because we cannot parasitize on anyone, as they do, say, in the united states, they have a level of deficit, a trade balance deficit,

they distributed these pieces of paper within the country, then they began to buy food products on the world food market goods, like a vacuum cleaner , swept away everything for the first time in many years, they became not importers, but became net buyers, importers of food products , food inflation all over the world immediately jumped, but we we cannot lead, because we do not have such a monopoly on the world currency as on the dollar in the united states, and we do not behave and have never behaved like colonialists or neo-colonialists, in this case we must, of course, rely on the capabilities of the economy, evaluate it realistically, we are doing this in order to balance the situation in industry and in the real sector of the economy today ...

flexibly fills new niches and quickly creates for us a much more flexible economy than it would be if it were purely a purely state, so may be just.

after all, i wouldn’t even use these epithets, why? because i don’t think it was purposefully done for any criminal purposes, yes, in many ways it was erroneous, it was based on the opinion of world-famous economists, including those of russian origin, who said that it was necessary to privatize anything, as quickly as possible.

owner and in many cases demonstrates this, especially in industries that involve large investments, with large investments, because for a period of time no one had an investment, and then all sorts of fraudulent schemes arose, when it means that during this false privatization, in fact, the theft of state property, money was taken.

associated with the criminal nature of the privatization of state property, but you are right , of course, that there must be some sensible, sound limiting lines, and we are talking about this with business representatives, discussing it, i am generally in favor of making an appropriate decision, even if at the level of presidential decree or government regulations, at the level of law, my business colleagues and i are now thinking about this together and we think that we will find this solution, thank you, well, let’s move on to more political issues, you always talk about your desire to negotiate

to end the conflict with the west in ukraine, of course, the desire to negotiate is commendable, positive, but... but - with whom to negotiate? our western partners have cheated us many times and are violating all the agreements that we reach with them. the kyiv regime is morally illegitimate politically illegitimate, even legally illegitimate from the point of view of even that which has not already taken place.

now it will not be carried out until there is a defeat, illegitimate, illegitimate and unreliable partners, how to deal with this, right? reliable, you are right that it is very difficult to negotiate with such a public, they deceive at

every step, they say one thing and do another, and this is sad, but everything, all armed conflicts end in some kind of peace agreements, however, as one told me of former leaders, quite significant european country, all these agreements can be based either on...

the powers of the verkhovna rada be extended, nothing is said about extending the powers of the president, there is a law on, a law on the essence of martial law, the martial law regime, and it says that in conditions of martial law provisions , presidential elections are not being held, but it does not say that they are being extended, i am, after all , a graduate of st. petersburg...

and you can find someone to conduct with, we are ready for these negotiations, but i just repeat on the terms that we agreed on before starting these negotiations in minsk then in istanbul, and not on some kind of fiction, but even with the intention of taking those agreements in istanbul as a basis, we still must proceed from reality.

who will do it except you? you have a huge responsibility, and if we crawl so slowly up this ladder, although there is certainly movement, then i ’m afraid that we’ll kind of shirk this responsibility, although i understand the gravity of the moral

choice, look, we’re talking about nuclear... escalation, we never started this rhetoric, i no longer remember the name of this lady, the former prime minister of great britain, who, when asked when she stopped being prime minister, said that she was ready to press the nuclear button, we never said that, that’s how it all started, we they simply answered that yes, we need to take this more seriously, they immediately started talking about the fact that we rattle nuclear weapons, we don’t rattle, first, second, what is use, non-use, in what case to use, we have a nuclear doctrine, and everything is written there, i was here yesterday only there i spoke with the heads of these news agencies, i said about this, we have everything written there, this application

is possible in an exceptional, precisely in an exceptional case in case of a threat to sovereignty and territorial integrity. now it is connected with the testing of nuclear weapons, we mean we not only signed it at some point.

and as for the results, you said that i have a great responsibility, yes, indeed, is it possible to increase the speed of solving the problems facing us? it is possible, but this is directly proportional to the losses, understanding responsibility, i still proceed from what the general staff, the ministry of defense proposes, speed is important, but even more important is concern for the lives and health of our guys. who are fighting at the front, so combat work is going on, but since the beginning of this year, 40 settlements there , i think 880 km, i think, have been liberated, we are gradually pushing the enemy out of

the territory of donbass from other adjacent territories, here - at the general staff, at the ministry of defense there are plans to implement and achieve all our goals, we are acting according to this plan, i’m sure all these plans will be implemented, and nevertheless, we understand perfectly well that escalating the movement along the nuclear escalation ladder can save a large number of lives. because it can bring some sense to our opponents, who, taking advantage of the fact that we - including having such an easy doctrine, i have no doubt that it will be changed, i hope that it will be changed soon, and you will already have the formal right to respond if you so decide, with a nuclear strike on any strikes

on our territory, this absolutely must be a sovereign right. they are going to war for the third time, in almost 100 years, they are going to war for the third time, well, the americans are much more careful, they fed them, fed them.

after all, the almighty once showed us the way, when for wantonness and debauchery he destroyed

sodom and gomorrah with a fiery rain, after that humanity remembered this for many years and behaved carefully, they now, but now she forgot about sodom and gomorrah, so maybe maybe, let's remember about this rain, and we'll try to with...

well, more or less defenseless, this is the first, second, second, the power of blows, we have our tactical nuclear weapons are three times more powerful than the bombs used by the americans against kheroshima and nagasaki, three to four times, we have many times more of them on the european continent, and even if the americans bring theirs... from the usa, we still have many times more, but if it comes, god forbid, yes, no matter what i really want, i will cross myself, that means, but then you

said, we will reduce the sacrifices, but they can grow indefinitely, this is the first , second, of course, these same europeans will have to think about it, if, therefore, those with whom we exchange such blows will not exist, they will get involved... are the americans already at the level of strategic weapons in this exchange of blows or not? i very much doubt it, and the europeans should also think about this, of course, but i still proceed from the fact that it will never come to this, we do not have such a need, because our armed forces are not just gaining experience.

since in vanity such things should not be mentioned , you behave so responsibly, speak so responsibly, but we are dealing with absolutely irresponsible and crazy partners, a terrible person, no,

you just know, i looked at these partners from the outside, from the outside, like most of us, and i grew up in that system, it happened in my life, i i know from a young age, i assure you that i have a reason to say what i say, although i understand perfectly well and support your hesitations, because this is a terrible choice, and a choice only as a last resort, but if they don’t know that you are not made, are not ready to make this choice, then they will fast endlessly fight, fight and bleed us, and at the same time, because they are fighting not only against us, they are also fighting against our friends in the world majority, because we are the military-strategic root of this, the core of this world majority, if

they overthrow us, then again... the decisions of both mine and my colleagues with whom i work in this area, they are not associated with any hesitations, hesitations, but on a real, objective analysis... analysis of the current situation, we are doing just that, the day before yesterday - you spoke to managers agencies said something extremely interesting, that we are ready and can supply a...