because of the supreme court's decision, the state of new york is stamped, so to speak, to disobey the decision of the supreme court, the more there is a precedent for the state of texas. and, for example, if trump is nevertheless convicted in one of the cases, the state of florida, maybe, where he lives, is registered as a voter, may not extradite him, well, that’s it, and as it were, well, what if if the state of texas , the army of florida is breaking into new york territory, but hard, there is no common border, for this purpose, quite rightly, they are marching through george, who is that marching?

now about collective biden and what in general is happening there. yes, of course, there were two media waves rising towards each other. first, biden is fine in general, what you say, you are traitors, is almost not true. the second ones, who say: no, guys, even the already open voices are heard that they say we need to change, we need to do something, we need to save. new names have appeared, finally those that i mentioned, and not all these michelle obamas, really reasonable governors have appeared there who could really take what the governors said, come over there, that's all.

everyone was told, guys, we have everything under control, yes, the old man is old, but this, this is a mighty old man, he is the father of american democracy, we have a team working, i don’t care at all, we are this trump, all these populists, we are this paratrooper , we are now all these goldfinches together with putin, by the way, we are now going to roll them into a pancake, everything is starting to fall apart, but pay attention, everything is falling apart for this administration, there are already three foreign policy conflicts, yes, and not in any of them. .. win, some have shameful pages, because let me remind you that the united states is already involved in the conflict in the middle east against the ansaral imensky houthis, and the operation, which was called the guardian of prosperity, does not guard anything, it only guards an aircraft carrier, so to speak, so that god forbid a missile does not fly over them, if you are somewhere else we saw such a shame, only biden at the debate, that’s it, now what the governors want, they say, guys, you still show us your grandfather, it seems to us, it seems to us, and the congressmen said the same thing.

it seems to us that you are hiding something from us, dear joseph robinet, it seems to me that he is sick, a cossack, not real, that is, this is what they demanded in person, they were not satisfied with a telephone conversation, this teleconference, they demanded a meeting in person, i say that guys, you know what, you have there problems, moreover, what kind of situation arises, it became clear during this struggle around biden, the debates of everything else, that it turns out that they directly uttered this word, the liberal press, the one that drowned for biden. you know, that is, it’s like there’s all sorts of fox news only for politics for new the york times is just recording now, but our mines are being grazed, well, in short, they called the word bubble bubble, that is, in fact , gil biden hunter biden, as it turned out , is constantly there now he has no other activities, how can i say it’s still in the beginning, well, he’s the chief specialist in pia, it’s clear why he received the money, and so to speak , in fact, even now.”

and who should i call? in this sense, you see, the whole world, all the united states, they are also united, so to speak, states of america, also in a sense, a state united in some kind of federation, does not know who makes the decisions in the united states. they essentially told not that biden is bad and not what trump is going to do with nato, that’s all, that’s all true, that’s all foam, but in reality, who makes the decision, for example, about where the aircraft carrier will go? will not be?

strike, for example, in lebanon or something else, who can it is a van lexus, the only version, the only working version, you know, the only working version. she solves her own issues, like i already do said, in conditions when there is no crisis, maybe nothing, but when there is a crisis in the world, a serious question arises, how decisions are made, but is there really some kind of conflict, which, so to speak, the united states will be directly involved in, that they will do, who will? the decision on the use of nuclear weapons there, i don’t know, in the end, who will make the decision on the fed rate in fact, what really janit yelin or so to speak, who will make the decision there, will really take the advice directors of the federal reserve, and the sale, let 's say, of treasuries, and let's say new regulators, i understand correctly that you

finally agreed with us and believe in the theory of reptilians, no, no, that's the whole point, that these are not reptilians, that’s the whole point, that this whole thing you had such a chance to move to... they hold all these threads in their hands and at the core of this system there is, well, this cocoon, which doesn’t make a decision at all, this means that this system is in danger and when you say, you want there to win, what we need in order to win, i understand perfectly well, military things don’t interfere there, well, listen, ensure

the domestic civil aviation industry, domestic processors, finally brix currency without dollars, because it’s difficult, it’s a complex technology, it’s not just that , these are actually multidimensional matrix calculations, but... but, but do it, it doesn’t matter to us what they will have there, there will be the munroe doctrine, maybe we’ll even talk somehow at the same resorts, sunbathe, but in eurasia, legs so that they don’t exist, but how is it do these three steps? thank you, here i would like to talk about russian-american relations, which have already been touched upon so quickly in the course of, in order to finish off the american topic, then move on to the main topic .

madam ambassador to the united states in the russian federation, lee streis, in which she, lyn treis, excuse me, in which she stated that it is still necessary to somehow maintain contacts in order to prevent the development, so to speak, of the situation according to an undesirable scenario , this also generally confirms my thoughts about the current state of russian-american relationships. it is obvious that in the current conditions, in the conditions of a virtual proxy war between moscow and washington, nothing else can be expected from these relations, so to speak, god willing, that the political

-military-political leadership of the two countries could prevent the development of events according to the most unfavorable scenario , that is, to avoid nuclear escalation. that’s all, that’s all that can be done now, as regards the future, russian-american relations, and what it means to avoid nuclear escalation, at the cost defeat, defeat, of course, no one wants, so, but no one wants death, this is total, then the question of price, if we, for example, exclude in advance the possibility of nuclear escalation, then we are thereby saying that our position is weak?

the strategic nuclear arsenal of the united states of america, without resorting to strategic

nuclear weapons, i mean russian hypersonic weapons, the russian federation already has such systems in its arsenal, they can disable a significant part of the american nuclear strategic not having a nuclear arsenal and using, so to speak , nuclear warheads with the help of conventional ammunition. well, that is, firstly, to inflict significant damage without crossing the strategic nuclear threshold, absolutely true, in

fact, the beginning of a nuclear war, absolutely true, uh, well, our hypersonic systems are not located on strategic nuclear carriers, i mean in in the form of a system like onyx, for example, or excuse me, zircon and caliber, if i understand correctly, everything that we fly can be performed in different types of combat nuclear equipment. that is, how it started there, no one knows that the vanguard will go through the southern city, everything is a start - about the vanguard, i’m talking about systems, for example , like the iskander, they can be launched from medium bombers like there, of course they will be launched anywhere in the continental united states of america correctly so then for the united states of america it is absolutely obvious that they will figure out whether it is flying nuclear or not nuclear, will they understand that it is nuclear?

doesn’t play any role here, it’s hypersound or not hypersound, hypersound only determines the speed of reaching the target, it is impossible to shoot down, nothing more, that is, there are certain difficulties with interception there, yes, yes with interception, but if you launch something over the territory of the united states, this is the beginning of a nuclear war, massive salvo - the beginning of a nuclear one.

let me tell you later after the program, and well, the sub-schedule, by the way, the vic-31 can also carry this same iskander, we’ll get into the wilds and yes, yes, you’re absolutely right, we won’t get into the wilds, so i’d just like to say , what this is the model, so to speak, of russian-american relations that existed during the period...

non-nuclear strategic systems appeared, which, theoretically speaking, can perform strategic tasks. the second point is that years from now... the fact that china and russia are now friends against the united states - this does not add, let’s say, it is unlikely to add to the americans’ desire to enter into, so to speak, some kind of negotiations with moscow, if

beijing is not involved, well, finally, that ’s the beginning. this stage soviet-american dialogue on strategic weapons, the americans still had technological superiority, they actively used it to achieve some kind of so-called favorable conditions for them during the conclusion of so-to-speak disarmament agreements, now they have the same technological superiority that they had about 50 years ago and even 20 years ago they simply didn’t have it. where did it go? it’s certainly an interesting question, but now the task of re-equipping american strategic nuclear forces has become, and this all comes with with a very big creak, well, that is , they made a new strategic nuclear bomber, so to speak, the b-21, uh, but as for, for example, intercontinental

ballistic missiles, the deadlines are shifted to the right, but as for - for example,

here too i would like to say about this, just a remark that the americans are a nation of traders, how good it would be for us, and the chinese and everyone else, if it were, for the iranians, by the way, if it were really so, alas, it is not so, it is now this is a nation of such fiery ideologists, such frenzied ones

revolutionaries, such bolshevik trotskyist ferment, unfortunately, so to speak, this... i’m afraid it will last for a long time, thank you for your attention, regarding weapons, in general, everything is not so, with all due respect, you are talking in terms of the previous war, we have some, oh what we don’t say, apparently , the advantage of aquatic environments, and underwater ones at that, is such that we seem to have hints, but what happens in space, we don’t see that the americans have a very serious group in space, and not only...

completely different war, completely different idea, we are now with great difficulty only seeing the contours of this war, so i would not rush here, the sanctions will last for a long time, but i am sure that they will not. because i don’t think that there will be a configuration of the world that we are used to, who told you that the united states of america in the form that we see it will be in 10 years, take the prediction about europe in 1902

, which seemed unshakable, which seemed like a european empire, after 20 years it was already everything else, now time has accelerated, we can’t even imagine what will happen in 10-15-20 years like this.

narendra modi is coming to us, there will be a big visit, our minister will go to southeast asia, that is, we see a huge number of events, and also brix, of course, united

by one common idea, the general idea is that a certain consolidation of the east asian space and the transformation of the countries that determine the situation in this space, at least either into our friends, or, so to speak , quite neutral countries, because if you look at the situation that was. v in the same region after the start of a special military operation, then, of course, the situation there was different, it is intended to watch the vote at the un, and we will see that a huge number of countries that are discussing key issues with us today, which, so to speak, are coming to the show and we we discuss these issues with them, these countries then took a slightly different position, i don’t want to say that it was hesitant, but it was a position largely dictated by that, so to speak, information. that, so to speak, those discourses that were asked the united states after the start of the svon on all these countries, just remember how in washington, the asian countries, so to speak, they

were treated by biden, well, i think, i think that he was not very strong then, so in general there was nothing, but then pancake arrived in phnom penh, and there they tried to force these countries to adopt an anti-russian policy, convincing them that we are toxic, that they can’t work with us, that they will receive huge privileges there, and none of this worked out, which is also very something important needs to be said, here they often talk about the sco, so they especially said that he doesn’t have any, so to speak, clear direction of development right now, i would say that this is not so, i think that the sco, like brix, is one of the platforms for the formation of this new big world, the euro-asian world, about which the president said that there should be no united states there, and you are actually moving towards this goal, the second very important point is, of course, the most important platform for negotiations, well, look, and negotiations with countries, mind you, with which our relationships almost always go south on the rise, first mongolia, the biggest issues

of transport, energy, education, the next was a meeting with turkey, well , there’s nothing to talk about here, despite all the american sanctions, despite all the pressure on turkey, our trade turnover with turkey has almost decreased by 1%, that is, in fact... 55 billion dollars, so to speak, last year - the task is to reach 100 now that the task was set to reach 100, yes, reach 100, but in conditions, you know, in such conditions pressure exerted by the united states on turkey, as a nato country, and such pressure on erdogan personally, to maintain this volume of trade that was, this is very important, so the issues that were discussed, especially now for turkey, the issue of terrorism in connection with the events in syria and so on, becomes extremely relevant. and our experience is extremely important for them, so i think that this meeting, which lasted more than an hour, it was extremely fruitful, it is quite obvious, it was visible at least

from the picture, but meetings with... 96 in 5 months, for 5 months of this year, this is official figures, that is , the impression was created that this trade, so to speak, problems had arisen, payments had arisen, and how it would all go, and this all affects trade, stops it , and that most likely the volume will be less than those figures, that happened last year, nothing like that, nothing like that, and it seems to me that here in relations with china, here is

a very important point now, that i... was not there and they were doing it from the firgana valley. moreover, it was in central asia that the battle with the arabs took place in 751, when, so to speak, the arabs went to central asia, there was a chinese army there, the chinese army retreated and was defeated. moreover, remember, at least the 16th century, the dzungar khanate, the defeat of the dzungar khanate, the entry of the manjorian cavalry and chinese infantry into almost the territory of modern kazakhstan, yes, when they practically reached almost the seven

palatines. this is what is here in central asia, where the shanghai cooperation organization began for china, this is about a certain sense, also a certain return, and here we must i repeat these relationships very clearly.

now, again, if you look at the meetings that took place there with pakistan regarding barter, a very important, let’s say, meeting, but with pakistan we trade less than a billion, so it’s possible to do this, so to speak, with azerbaijan very important in relation to this north-south, but our trade there with everywhere is growing, this is a very important point, there is now $4 billion with azerbaijan and so on, it is growing with kazakhstan, where we have $28 billion, but...