after all, if they run to russia, and many want to, then the self-deception of people with beautiful faces about the supposedly ideal west will finally collapse. evgenia petrukhina, and the other side of immigration. the foundations of international stability and security were destroyed by the united states, russia had to react, including in the military sphere, vladimir putin stated this today during a conversation with journalists following the summit of the shanghai cooperation organization in astana. during the press approach, the president managed to answer many of our questions. colleagues on the current agenda: what the head of state said without cuts, further on our air.

between the new sovereign states and china, gradually, gradually this organization began to gain momentum, in the modern world it has certainly become very popular, because it is obviously one of the independent centers of the new multipolar world, this is what has become attractive to the participants of the organization.

first, second, after all, this is a platform for coordinating positions between strange participants, here is the chinese folk republic, russia, india, pakistan, you know, there are no personal contacts, then, among other things, if it is like that, it has become powerful, big, then the principles that it...

for any weapon in space, that’s all- however, a signal of cooperation opposes the placement that all countries of the shanghai organization of the rest of the world regarding how we relate to the militarization of outer space. there are other things that are certainly serious and important, but i already said, firstly, trillion-dollar turnover joint trade, this matters when issues related to economic interaction are discussed, of course, this is very important in bilateral and multilateral terms, i already said, well, five, what is 5.4 in my opinion or 5.3% gdp growth, 4.5% growth.

in general, everyone heard this, our direct appeal, in connection with ukrainian topics, there was a lot about this today, well, it was normal, the question arises, back in december ninety de... it is possible, but in conditions of usurpation of power , the ruling elite in ukraine is meaningless because most subordinated to this so-called ruling elite, which i mentioned, because it is illegally in power and does not even

apply to the constitutional court for confirmation of its powers, because , as i already said in 2015, the supreme court of ukraine. has already decided that the term of the presidency in ukraine is limited to five years and there are no reasons for extending the term of presidential powers in accordance with the constitution of ukraine, all powers should go to the rada, but it does not take these powers for itself, so contact of course, it is possible based on the practical situation, from what is happening in... real life, this is more or less meaningless, as for the union state, it is developing, we remember all the goals and objectives that were set in the initial documents, but we actually speaking, we are going along this path, we simply decided,

and the president of belarus believes, i support him, that at the first stage we need to solve first of all... issues of not a political, but an economic nature, we need to create a basis for further rapprochement on the political track, although in the sphere of politics in our country, thank god, everything is in order, we have inter -parliamentary and inter-governmental structures working, is it necessary now to move, as was originally announced, to the creation of a single parliament, but it is a matter of time, i agree with alexandro. we need to properly strengthen our relations in the economic sphere, and the same goes for finance and the single currency, in general, no one is saying that this is impossible or impossible or should not be done, but we need to be economically mature for this, because what's in

in the european union, you know, a state with a weak economy with an economy with the creation of a single currency has everything. after all, many states with weak economies suffered because nothing can be regulated with the help of inflation, since everything is tied to the euro, well, there is no drachma, for example, and greece could not regulate its internal economic processes with the help of the national currency, so it is necessary that the level of economic interaction was appropriate, and we took very serious steps towards this direction.

full membership in the sco, that russia does not decide this alone, it is always decided on the basis of consensus, there are issues with various countries, members of the shanghai cooperation organization, this concerns the inclusiveness of power in afghanistan, i think that these are all issues that can be resolved, and we must maintain relations with afghanistan, with the real... political structures that control this power in the country, we will do this, and i don’t see why we should

somehow turn away from this now, but what when this will happen will depend on how the situation develops. good evening, pavel zarubin, russia tv channel, a few months ago i managed to ask you a question, who is better for us, biden or trump? and you said then that biden, but now he’s coming out... as i said then, what has changed, but nothing has changed, what we did

n’t know, or something, what could be happening is known, in this sense, nothing has changed, but about watching, not watching, but i saw some fragments, i have my own things to do enough, that’s why i don’t particularly follow what’s happening there, especially in the comments of the media, they always have certain preferences, some are for, some are against, well...

you know, what mr. trump , as the presidential candidate declares that he is ready and wants to stop the war in ukraine, we take this quite seriously, i am not familiar, of course, with his possible proposals on how he is going to do this, and this is of course the key question, but i have no doubt that he means it sincerely, and we we support this, the news, now, yes, please, yes, now, now, please,

andrei kolesnikov, kommersant newspaper, vladimir vladimirovich, tell me, what do you think, uh, is it possible for a ceasefire along the line of military contact with ukraine, before the start of peaceful negotiations, without preconditions, so that, at least in order to increase the chance of success, or is this also a subject of negotiations? thank you, yes, you know, i will remind you of some things, when our troops were stationed near kiev, we received an offer and even a request from nastoyachy western partners to stop.

endowed with the authority to sign the final documents, and moreover, not even to sign the final documents, but to lead to the signing of even the final document, the fundamental question here is not only the competence of these intermediaries, but their powers, who can give the powers to the intermediary such that if we could put an end to this confrontation, i just - well, i think it's...

about the need to start producing drums rsnd systems, this is about some new weapon and only about production or deployment as well. if you remember, i said that in connection with the withdrawal of the united states from this treaty and the announcement that they were beginning to begin production, we also consider ourselves entitled to begin development and, in the future , production, so we are conducting these operations.

will appear in some region of the world, and if american-made medium- and shorter-range missile systems appear somewhere, then we reserve the right act in a mirror manner, everything remains, as we can ask about the authorities, now now, now, well, come on, well please, anyway alexander yunev, yesterday you had a series of bilateral meetings, special attention was focused on your negotiations with erdogan, with whom you personally for a long time... we saw each other, although our trade turnover between countries is falling, if it’s not a secret, it is now growing, well , still not at the pace we would like, and if it’s not a secret, what you were talking about when we left, when did the press leave? and which one is the best the main problem in relations between russia and turkey, something is stopping us, maybe who, when you go, what is stopping us, it is well known that this helps us, and what

helps us is the political will of president erdogan , but in technical terms these are calculations, everyone knows it well, although our turkish partners said yesterday that yes, in value terms our trade volumes have decreased from 63 billion to 55 billion. about the same thing as it was, well i 'll check, but the point is not even to check, but the point is to intensify our work, in general there is interest in this on both sides, there are also

things of an objective nature related not to the fact that someone is bothering us, but to the real development of the event, for example, a good harvest in turkey, their storage facilities are filled with grain, they began to buy grain less, well , as an element or... for example, their tax restrictions associated with our metallurgical industry, but this has nothing to do with any restrictions from the outside, it’s just like the dynamics of the domestic production of our bilateral relations, all issues can be resolved. viktor orban recently, now, now, now, now, is it possible, is it possible, please, hello, vladimir vladimirovicherkach, world, belarus today.

with the people's republic of china or with india, where there are probably more than one and a half billion people, but still this is an important element of the shanghai cooperation organization, because belarus is already an eastern... europe and this is the way out , officially the shanghai cooperation organization is already in full sense of the word to the european continent, and for the most for belarus, i also think this is a big plus, because after all, through belarus through russia, and then through, say, kazakhstan, uzbekistan has access and therefore to the caspian sea, further to iran. but for belarus this is important, and belarus still remains a large, say, exporter of mineral fertilizers, and for it it is important which routes it

supplies its goods, it is important which routes it can and which countries can supply its agricultural machinery, it is important which routes and what it can receive from the countries of the shanghai cooperation organization, so i think it's a win-win decision, and to a certain extent, it's a success. alexander grigoryevich lukashenko and his ministry of foreign affairs. is it possible, please, yes, come on, come on, please, well, it’s possible, it’s possible, interfax agency ksenia chernyaeva. at the moment, in fact, the entire previous system of strategic stability has been annulled; start-3, the inf treaty and devziai are not working. is it possible in the future to renew these agreements, or will they never be relevant again? or should we come up with something something new, for example, some kind of unified concept, convention, some other framework document, with whom on this topic, on what platform should

this topic be discussed and such agreements recorded. thank you. the first thing i want to point out is that the truly fundamental documents that underpinned international stability and security by the united states have been destroyed. well, we weren't the ones who came out. treaty on anti-ballistic missile defense, and this was one of the cornerstones, and that means either a treaty on intermediate-range missiles, shorter-range missiles or this means that many elements that underlay international stability have been destroyed in recent years, we didn’t do everything, it was all done by the united states, that’s all we could do? take note and respond to these actions, so we reacted in the military sphere, for example, to overcome the missile defense systems created by the united states, what did we

do? invented and quite successfully a system for overcoming pro, these are, for example, vanguards, intercontinental range, planning blocks with hypersonic speed, these are systems for overcoming intercontinental-range ballistic missile technology and some other things, we were forced to do this, but still... the question of creating a legal framework for international security and strategic stability, of course, this question is raised, but we must whether these are new agreements or a return to old ones, experts must say, i know, even when i studied at the university, i did not study public international law, i studied private international law, and that means the corresponding final ones -

i wrote dissertations on this subject - then i studied economics, but the point is not even this, not the formal side, not the legal side of the matter, the essence of the issues that we must solve together, we formulated our proposal, i spoke about this when i spoke at the foreign ministry to the leadership of the foreign ministry, in principle it is put on paper, but there must be good will on the part of those who are interested in this, as we sometimes hear: from the united states, that they want to resume this topic conversations, well, it’s unclear, sometimes they want it, sometimes they don’t want it anymore, just before, well, during the last period of president obama’s administration , they gave us signals that they wanted it, then suddenly they didn’t want it, now during the election campaign, and one that they wear like this there are very sharp internal political issues inside...

to talk about what we can now establish with the united states, and first of all we need to talk to them about this, some kind of constructive dialogue, it seems to me that everyone present here, and people in general, who at least slightly monitor with the current events, they understand that this is impossible today, we need to wait for the elections in the united states and understand the mood and preferences of the future administration, we are ready for this.

the administration will come to understand what their preferences, views, what plans are, and if they want to talk about this, i repeat once again, they send us this signal from time to time that they want to resume this dialogue with us, and then suddenly disappear somewhere, begin to talk about some abstract topics that have no direct attitude towards issues of strategic stability, i repeat again, well, let us wait for the formation of the new administration and... we will understand what its plans and preferences are, i want to repeat again, we are ready for this, travel with alfabank, choose where to fly in the alpha travel service and get

a supercake. on air tickets, this alpha friday , july 5, we are giving 30% cashback on flights to sochi, it’s not just profitable, it’s alpha profitable that we bring savito from travel, cashback bonuses for the next trip, avito travel, everything will go as booked, with cashback bonuses, maybe soses. together the appetite is papas, dad can, only dad will tame it, papalo, papa can, there is a beastly appetite, a snack will not hurt, if you don’t have an appetite, sausages will help, knee pain, back pain, neck pain maybe, pintalgin extragel contains the maximum dose of the substance from pain and inflammation, pintalgin extragel in sportsmaster, prices in half, numbered sports brands.