who are you? i, a traveler, an aeronaut, jean ivan, and so we are left wondering, what a fairy tale, without ivan, what has begun? without deception and without a flint, he quickly imprisoned me in a flint, a pen, a magic self-written ink. beat yourself over the head, you have a nickname, where it goes, that’s what my name is, because i’m not taking you where you fool want, where you need to, i can’t live without travel, flint, he who has flint doesn’t need a pen in the pocket?

soon, got used to watching videos online, stopped working, install, open, we watch russian channels, all series, movies and cartoons, educational programs and documentaries, we watch, we watch in the application or on the website.

no, of course, i played with cannons from the times of the napoleonic wars, well, because my mother worked in the museum of the panorama of the battle of bradinov and there the cannons were displayed around the perimeter, well, when i started serving in the army, i was in uniform in the year 1947, 1800, no 947 years, but it was very interesting, beautiful, as of course, yes, when the wonderland here ended there, like a holatic, that’s simple, you’re just a little growth, not you, much like me, i would also like a few words about the nato summit, there are 3 days, today is the initial one, tomorrow a full day will be devoted to the ukrainian conflict, relations with russia, here is the third, third day - this is relations already in the pacific ocean, that is, the indo-pacific region, this is typical, it cannot be said that nato has not changed, nato is changing, changing very seriously, it began as a regional bloc, according to all the charters it will be written there,

there is no enemy there, the enemy was prohibited by the charter the un, therefore, is not an enemy, not that it will perform any global functions, this alliance is not written there. moreover, when it was created, initially the same isenhaur believed that we would now create some kind of military basis here that would allow us to carry out the marshal’s plan, then we would leave all this in europe and go about our own business. europe has never been so close to the united states. therefore, they initially created the organization of american states, it was created before that, and only then, when the british created this nato, this idea of ​​the first secretary general, that americans in, that is, to keep the americans here, and for the senkhour administration it later became serious, this, by the way, is a very important thing, because now this is exactly how trump proceeds from that position. trump's plan

for nato consists of a very simple two-point plan: a reduction in the united states' military commitments within nato. air component, naval component, nuclear umbrella, space support, then there is a space group, all ground forces, all material support - all this moves to the european level. moreover, kolbo believes that there can be no national military-industrial complexes

in europe. a single military-industrial complex must be built, which applies to everything, to the entire european union. another theorist.

in europe there are currently american troops , well, it’s believed that what they received in vilnius is 3,000 for rapid deployment, now there seem to be 40,000, they are talking about what they should further increase, this is considered a lot for the united states, given that eric

smith is such a commander, he is now the commander of the marine corps, usa, he gave an interview 2 days ago, saying that that we... are now increasing our contingents in the far east, and quite large purchases are being carried out, it is supposed to take into account the north military district, here are drones, rebs, all this needs to be purchased in large quantities and sent to the far east, they are modernizing the bases marine corps in japan, south korea, guam, the philippines, australia, that is, by and large, very serious training is underway there. the third day will most likely be about this, yes, the third day is exactly about this, they are also inviting these people, that is, nato is becoming global, thereby violating the principle of its own, its organization and the charter of the united nations, that is, violating its mandate, and no one , that’s what neither biden nor

trump refuses from this. argentina said that it wants nato, we are breaking off relations with china, we give weapons to the ukrainians, give them to us at 16. by the way, they are also trying to increase the military component here, first of all, the f35 will go to the far east, there are more there to a greater extent, and the europeans must provide the entire land component to pay for this, this despite the fact that quite recently, well, remember, 1998, when tony blair and jacques cherak tried to create a european rapid reaction force, what madeline albright told them.

dunks, artillery, aviation, so what is the general conclusion: nato is superior to us in numbers soldiers of the air force and navy are inferior in artillery and nuclear charges, this was prepared by bilt, compare the armed forces of 32 nato countries with russia and china, all 3,438.97 people serve in the nato armies, almost half of them are in the us army, this is more than russia and china together, the country has 1894 rszzo together, one.

it is clear that russia has no point in attacking nato, that is, the very idea that russia would suddenly rush to nato looks idiotic, but what russia needs to understand is that with a population of 150 million people to oppose a military bloc with a population of a billion can only be used.

we don’t yet even come close to understanding how this kind of unified command could be created in a hypothetical bloc with iran, china, north korea, india, that is, we don’t have it yet, and without a command it doesn’t exist, but it’s no coincidence that the question of creating security systems, the security system can ultimately not only , i emphasize again, not only include a military component. both economic and social, well many others, so not only the military, but

it can include the military, and it is not by chance that i just said that china, in principle , needs to tense up, because nato, which is now becoming de facto global, well , excuse me, two two are involved in the attack countries, this is obvious, these are two nato countries, nato is not hiding it, it is becoming global, yes, nato, of course, they have not opened their office there in japan in tokyo, but this is it. who has arrived now, this is exactly what it is, that this is not a problem, it is open, especially since in a military alliance, you said correctly, the management system, the entire nato management system, it is american and will not go anywhere, just like there was an american general who heads eurocom, an american structure, he also serves as the nato unified commands, we cannot create such a structure, but something- something new is happening now, we have not yet created such a structure. created, and as for the latest military, nuclear components,

sergei alekseevich ribkov said three days ago that we are now supplementing our nuclear doctrine, i won’t guess what will happen there, but we will update it, so this, mikhail mikhailovich, is a few words about the incident that occurred at the children's hospital in the city of kiev. to begin with, i must say that i am always traditionally surprised by the speed, the speed with which both the military-political leadership in kiev and many figures abroad literally immediately sum up the results of this or that missile attack on military targets on the territory of ukraine, the dust has not yet settled, the contrails of missiles are still visible in the air, but they already understand everything, where, who, where, why. in that in terms of what i wanted to say, usually when repelling any strike from an air

attack weapon, the situation is usually complex, and in order to clarify what actually happened there , how everything happened, but you must first draw up an accurate map of the reactionary wiring of all targets, then it is necessary to collect data from all missile batteries and divisions that took part in repelling this strike, that is, they carried out live firing, so i am convinced that when... he imposes it on the city of kiev, he will take firing cards of missile units , that it turns out that no russian...

uh, it was actually in general that live firing at an air enemy is quite a complex matter and uh, it’s quite possible, it’s quite possible that, as they say, the whole thing was going normal, but at the seventeenth or twelfth second the autopilot failed, radio control unit, radio imaging, homing failure occurred, and since all levels of protection from the warhead had already been removed,

control of the missile was lost; the location where the air target was hit fell in one place or another. area of ​​the city, plus everything, when in in the conditions of dense urban development , live fire is being carried out, then something somewhere will definitely fall on some sensitive points of the city, no matter what sectors of the ban are introduced there, restrictions on heights and so on, well, it just doesn’t happen any other way , this is just collateral damage, even verkhovna rada deputy maryana bezuglaya said that there is probably more damage sometimes from live fire than from positive results in defeating an airborne enemy. well, not only that no one heard her voice, so the speakers of the ukrainian air force simply flew at her with direct insults, moreover, degrading human dignity, which in any case, even more so in relation to a woman, well, in no case can be done, now about that, that this city hospital could have been some kind of target, well, i usually only tell those

things in which i either participated once, or saw with my own eyes, or... was directly involved, that’s when i took part in development and strategic operations, military operations, including where we determined a list of targets that needed to be struck by one or another weapon. we have never selected any civilian objects, usually control posts, airfields, warehouses, naval bases, ships in parking lots, why? because , again, well, even if... the group determines some kind of object, it still goes through many stages of approval with certain departments, then it is submitted for approval to all higher authorities, this plan is signed, approved, and so that at all levels of this work, levels of this work , some children’s hospital is unambiguously identified as a strike, especially with high-precision,

expensive weapons, this cannot happen, since this can never happen, well, i declare this with full responsibility, how much i took direct part in all these processes, this cannot be, and uh, what else in this regard should be taken away, again, well, firstly, the military effect, the military effect of this is the minimum, let's say so, well, in the end, well, this is inappropriate, no matter how cynical it may sound on my part, this is inappropriate expenditure of expensive weapons, since strikes on one or another military... facility on the territory of ukraine will most likely continue, since these are the most likely steps, measures to force ukraine to conclude certain peace agreements, but all sorts of cases are possible, again, i say again, during combat shooting, combat work against the air against the air, well, all sorts of situations are possible, for example, for example, applied strike with an aeroballistic missile, the flight

mission of this hyperzero aeroballistic strike is to strike, for example, a strike on the central one. defense of ukraine, i call it conditionally, for example, the enemy discovered this product of ours, accompanied it, opened fire, there were even explosions of anti-aircraft guided missiles, and for example, that incident occurred, which is called knocked off the trajectory, instead of hitting the central command air defense force point, it deviated from the trajectory and ended up there, for example, in a camp, in a holiday camp, perhaps this is possible, who is to blame for this, like now?

how possible is it to resist the nato bloc? confrontation with the nato bloc with conventional

weapons due to its superiority in conventional means of warfare, but on our part, here is a move, any course of combat operations will be extremely unfavorable for us due to our superiority to almost everyone in all positions, several times therefore. as it seems to me, any, any confrontation with the nato bloc is only possible with the use of nuclear weapons, but there is simply no other option no, because there is such a concept, it is called the basic law of war, the basic law of war, what it says is that the course and outcome of an armed struggle is determined by the combined military-economic potentials of the parties, but if the nato military organization is superior to us by an order of magnitude in some indicators, and then two to that... then entering into such an armed confrontation only with conventional means of destruction is completely futile for us. saleon said that at the

nato summit, for the first time, each member of the alliance will give a promise to strengthen its defense potential. will you kiss the ring or eat the soil from the pot? well, i just wonder how they are going to make promises? on blood on blood, on blood. well, i can’t help but comment. states and where were the united states and nato as a whole? 30 years have passed and what is the balance of power?

it’s better not to compare, as we had so much in terms of technology and bc, ask, there was no political will, that’s another question, well, we understand what i’m talking about. what was the balance of forces then on the strategic at any other level, now, nato is increasing its area of ​​responsibility, moving to

asia, that’s right, the total product of those countries that nato supports economically, in terms of the balance of forces with the rest of the world, including china, russia, india and everyone else, it can to support this trend of expansion, that is, they...

welcome to asia, here the heart of the continent beats.