and this is the main philosophy of such shows - through art, to find the key to mutual understanding in the world. this. a big information evening; in the near future we expect a press conference by russian foreign minister sergei lavrov following the ministerial meetings of the un security council. naturally, we will take a break to show it live, and that’s what else we’ll talk about this hour. a soldier who remains human. how our fighters take the real history of evidence from both sides among vseushnikov. you can't hide from them, no hide, they are the ones who will hunt. f-16

in the skies over ukraine. the russian army has received the first modernized mig-31 fighter-interceptors, the polish press writes: what to expect from these speed demons? russian soldiers will be protected from the enemy by the wings of an angel. this is what the fighters call the new mobile stations ref, in what radius they jam the control signal of ukrainian birds. if you want peace for your country, then you are an enemy of zelensky. ukrainian millionaire bloggers were given the peacemaker base because they called for stopping the conflict. who else could become an enemy of the regime? fighting the agenda. elon musk will move spacex from california to texas, microsoft will dissolve its diversity department. a subtle calculation or an attempt to save your family and business.

russian attack aircraft run up to the opornik, where the enemy detachment is hiding, and then , making sure that the enemy does not offer resistance, gives each armed forces officer the opportunity to calmly surrender, this is a sensational video from the area of ​​​​responsibility of our group of troops north in the kharkov region, and remarkable footage of two at once reasons: firstly, it is clear how demoralized the ukrainian soldiers are, who immediately laid down their arms, although they seemed to be not inferior to our... servicemen in numbers, respectively, hypothetically they could have tried to fight back, but preferred captivity, and secondly, that perhaps more importantly, the video serves as clear evidence of the humanism of russian fighters; they, of course, act quite harshly, since security considerations have not been canceled, however, as is not difficult to notice, they do not allow themselves anything even remotely similar to any bullying towards ukrainian militants, there is certainly something to compare with, anton potkovenko will confirm,

hello, greetings, well, is the contrast with how the ukrainian nazis behave extremely clear? yes, the contrast is very, very clear, everything is very clear, you can see who are people and who are not people. our fighters fight in such a way that the dry land soldiers can surrender, without fear of being destroyed or tortured, no matter how they are treated by dill propaganda, they raise their hands up and remain alive, like these in the newly captured a guard under escort with his hands tied? but there is no assault or bullying; the prisoners even try to joke awkwardly, ours respond. how did you process my reactions? everything is fine. well, now the promised broadcast from new york. let's start the press conference. it will be in russian, but simultaneous translation into english is available. mr. minister, please.

the question that we brought to the open debate yesterday was devoted to discussing the conceptual foundations of international relations, multilateralism, multi-polarity, and we drew attention to the fact that the system, which was created after the second world war and is based on the central role of the un, is gradually eroding, well, i hope you were able to familiarize yourself with my speech, with the speech of other... participants, the main

conclusion, of course, is we it was hardly expected that it would be possible to agree on most issues, given the tension now observed in the international arena, how... relations between the collective west and the world majority are developing, but nevertheless, although we had no great illusions, but i think it was a very useful conversation, at least the vast majority of participants agreed that there was a topic, there were problems, and many expressed assessments that coincided with our vision of an objectively emerging multipolar world order.

when a small group of states was gathered in copenhagen, then there were several more meetings called the copenhagen format, each time our western colleagues tried to the ukrainian regime by hook or by crook, various tricks, promises, to attract

as many states as possible to participate in these events, the last time the copenhagen format met in davos, speaking to journalists, he emphasized that it was impossible to reach an agreement without the participation

of russia, well, i immediately asked him, but if you are convinced of this, why did you hold this meeting then, there was no answer, but the answer is that the course has been taken to push through at any cost the so-called zelensky plan, which have a clearly defined form ultimatum, and... my swiss colleague warned me in january that they would , following the copenhagen format meetings, hold a peace summit, but as you know, the summit did not work out, it turned out to be a peace conference, several heads of state actually participated in it, but the overwhelming majority most of those who eventually arrived were represented at a lower level; this meeting took place mid-month ago in bürgenstock, switzerland. after which, well, the overwhelming majority of participants expressed such restrained if

not to say, negative assessments in terms of its results, we can talk about this later, but now i’ll return to the second conference, which you mentioned, following bürgenstock, both zelensky and some western representatives began to talk about this second conference, but were not mentioned only switzerland, but also other countries. we have made the leap to the peace summit, now we must prepare a document that we

will put on the table in front of russia so that various powerful countries will try to end this war fairly, that's what it means it’s difficult to understand, but one thing is clear: zelensky’s formula of unacceptability, which everyone has known very well and for a long time, still lies at the basis. all these efforts, so you know, if we talk about peaceful efforts, for some reason everyone talks about this buergenstock, but no one talks about china’s initiatives, of which there were several, at the beginning of this year, later, china put forward its proposals, recently china together with brazil , we also formalized several elements of the initiative, i will not list them, but the main difference from the zelensky formula and from what... is being done at these gatherings within the copenhagen format, the difference is that

firstly, china, brazil, and many other countries that have joined them are in favor of convening a conference on principles that will be acceptable to all parties. the second, this already concerns the content of the dialogue, is that china very clearly outlined the need in its first initiative. physical combat actions using the army against those regions of ukraine that

they refused to recognize as legitimate the persons who came to power as a result of this coup, the minsk agreements, which no one was going to implement, so you know , if we talk about the evolution of this whole process, they tell us: russia is obliged to go to the border. if only in february 2014.

declaring immediately after the coup d'etat, having occupied the administrative building, that they were canceling the status of the russian language in ukraine, that they were demanding that the russians liberate crimea, from the russian population, that is, from ukrainian citizens living in crimea, it did not work to keep ukraine within the borders of 1991, because crimea held a referendum and the expression of will did not raise any doubts among any of the objective observers; it returned to russia and in the east of...

russia ukraine. was signed in istanbul in april of twenty-two, then ukraine would have been within the borders of 991 minus crimea and minus that part of the territory that was controlled by russian troops at that time, it turned out that we were also lied to when

they said that this agreement was the way to the world, well , or they didn’t lie, probably, ukrainian... the negotiators were sincere when they endorsed and initialed this document, but as the chief negotiator admitted in a recent interview on television, boris johnson came and forbade them to implement this agreement, so it was never formalized, so you see, every time we are in the spirit we are sincerely trying to extinguish this crisis that began more than 10 years ago.

and it turned out that within the framework of nato, within the osce, the only goal pursued by washington is to subjugate all the countries that

are members of these structures, and to subjugate themselves executive bodies of both the osce and nato, now the european union has signed an agreement with nato, according to which it recognizes nato as a senior partner and is ready to use any means necessary.

on may 28, us president biden, when he agreed to an interview, quoted. and he said: china's economy is on the verge, on the verge of failure. in your opinion, what are the results of the chinese economy, and could you say why the economy, which is on the brink of what nato calls decisive, provides a factor in the ukrainian context. he said.

promoting with the west itself a model of globalization, the unity of the world economy, in addition to all this, or rather, in such conditions, the more such restrictions there are, the more aggressively the owners of that bretton woods system act, the more actively and efficiently they will work to create their technologies, their products , countries against which...

bloc, bloc structures, and nato itself , have decided to promote the infrastructure of this bloc, as they say, into the indo-pacific region, and practically steps are already being taken. stoltenberg is the same stated, answering the question, but what, you have always called yourself a defensive alliance, an alliance to protect the territory of member countries, he says: yes, we remain a defensive alliance, but there are threats to our alliance. now global, so we must go to the indo-pacific region, but i think that the aggressive, unfair essence of such a position is, of course, clear to everyone, we are with the people's republic of china with our other partners within the framework of the shanghai cooperation organization, in contacts with asia, with the countries' cooperation council persian gulf we advocate that...

those located on the western part of the eurasian continent, including for eurasia, if when these countries realize that nato-centric blocs are leading them in the wrong direction, you know how europe is now

economically... energy sources, after the introduction of sanctions , began to pay 200 billion euros more, and various laws were adopted in the united states to combat inflation, the result of which was that european business began to move to the united states. deindustrialization europe threatens, that’s why this is the edge or not the edge,

bringing or not bringing, who has this bring? it is not entirely, not entirely correct to assess the chinese economy based on geopolitical interests, we must be guided by facts, please, yes? please tell me to what extent the us policy of double standards in the middle east can lead to a full-scale war: on the one hand, non-compliance with the security council resolution on the palestinian-israeli conflict, including gas, on the other hand, the demonization of hamas and hezbollah in lebanon. is there any danger that iran will enter into a full-scale, direct, open war with israel. thank you.