russian citizens who have received citizenship for less than 5 years do not have the right to obtain permission to own weapons, but we see that they are arming themselves, why are they arming themselves, why do they need these weapons, in this regard , to establish serious order here, this is simply the call of the time , and i am very glad that the state duma understands the danger of such an unregulated situation with migrants and has taken up this issue, i hope, among other things, we remember the very correct initiative of alexander ivanovich bastrykin, who also having full information about the number and composition of crimes, the alarm is already ringing, and here, of course, we need to take serious government measures, we must ensure national security for ourselves, and most importantly, the security of our cities, this is true, sergei mikhailovich, thank you, sir the head of the a just russia party was in touch with us.

the truth, sergei mironov, who are you, me, a traveler, an aeronaut, jean ivan, and so we are left teasing, what a fairy tale, without ivan, uh, what started, the demon? mana is without flint, don't go into my flint sharpened, pen, self-written, magic ink, you’ll get it, you’re the main thing, van, hurry up, so give me a horse, mechanically, beat yourself on the head, you have a nickname, where it’s needed, that’s what my name is, because i’m taking it to the wrong place , where you fool want to go, where you need to go. i can’t live without travel, flint,

he doesn’t need a pen, he who has flint in his pocket, have you ever thought about what would happen to us if we didn’t have bread. bread is the world, the most sacred thing that a person has, what is in every family, bread created our civilization, contributed to our evolution, the technical revolution, this is the future of man.

i'm glad you're here again, i'm glad to see you, you weren't far, not that far, we worked together, we lived next to each other, it's amazing how you like your new life, quite good, good, it was an adjustment, several energetic months that i said that i said, i have to ask you, because i also worked in television for a long time, but you worked in the news... i just don’t understand how

the media representatives in our work could look at the last biden-trump debate and say, i just can't believe that there's something wrong with him, that he's sick or old or something like that, that he doesn't act like he used to, like people who they interviewed him before , they might not have known this. i think this is a real opportunity to raise more. data, take a close look at president biden's problem and his decision to seek re-election. we already have some data, there was a debate that you just mentioned and people were very surprised by it behavior. and now we have the abc interview and its full transcript. i think the time has come for other media outlets that have interviewed the president over the last couple of years to release the full transcript of those interviews. i think that makes sense.

because we will have a broader set of data to assess whether this was an isolated event, as the white house claims, or were there previous signs of deterioration in health, were they obvious or were they subtle? and if they were obvious, why were they cut out? i think having this is more wide data set will really inform the public debate and the president's decision to continue the race, and there is quite a lot of data, i mean, i knew biden, i watched him, i was around biden for over 30 years, and i remember my reaction in 2019, when he decided to run in...

his performance, especially the debate, but other journalists seemed to be, or they were pretending, i don't understand how someone who interviewed him two years ago can not know that what - that's not true. i think it's the opportunity to provide a broader set of data so that the public can make an independent assessment. what will this data look like? let's see what the printed versions of the interviews say? organizations that conducted interviews with we have transcripts, the president's news outlets should have them, it's not customary to publish video clips of interviews, but you can publish a transcript, and i say

this as someone who published a transcript of my interview with president trump in 2020, i think publication promotes transparency, so... this way you get an overview of the interview, i think that makes sense because there are other sections of the interview that maybe your news organization wouldn't look at, you know, kind of separately, i think. that you have a huge responsibility when you talk to the president of the united states, probably the nuker in chief, to ask him questions that are of interest not only to your news organization, but to others as well, right, finally, i think the transcript allows for the addition of the edited version. which you either publish or broadcast, right, because then the public will be able to see those sections of the interview that you cut or changed for clarity. right, so, i know, i haven't thought about this enough, but i know that in 2015 or 16, the new york

times editorial board met with trump, they published an apparently unedited transcript that was chaotic, his speaking style is a little off . . excellent characterization, yes, not consistent, but you know, it's common knowledge, i think he's much better in front of the camera than in transcripts, but whatever you think about it, they posted it, i don't remember any news organization posting a transcript of an interview with biden in the last 4 years, do you? you know, i don't remember, but i haven't actually checked them all, but what's the reason, i guess what bothers me is... everyone acts like it's a shock, it wasn't a shock to me, i don't have any special knowledge, some of it, i immediately made it public, but every time i saw him, it was quite obvious that there was something wrong with this guy not in a way that would shock journalists, why didn't they come forward with it right away, but they

could have, i guess it makes sense now, ultimately it's up to them, but i think it's about transparency, i think that now we are talking about information.

but this is a very fine line and you should not, for the sake of clarity and brevity or compression of information , cross this line so that you know to clean up. it feels like this is really the case. i don't want to judge others too much, yakuya once deleted something from an interview with someone. i don't i can't remember ever doing it again, but i wouldn't do it now either, but a few years ago someone said something so weird in an interview that i didn't want to continue, like i don't even know about what the hell are you talking about. and i asked the editors to take it out just because it wasn't relevant to the conversation, it was weird. so. it doesn't matter, i did it, i did it, but if you're interviewing someone and the person you're talking to

seems weird throughout the interview and you try to hide it, then you're probably a liar like you think, i think when you talk to the president of the united states, you instinctively want him to look his best, i understand that, but if there are signs, i don't know if there were, but if there are signs of poor health, or he really ... for those of us who missed the cbs report, tell us what this tax investigation into hunter biden is, he ended up being convicted, in my personal opinion, of a completely ridiculous crime, illegal possession of a gun, who cares this, but there other potential crime, tell us about the tax investigation, i would say that in the hunter biden case there are... two components: the first is the weapons charge, the second is the tax case. i always

believed that the tax case was much more serious and represented the greatest legal danger for himself and his family members. i would encourage people to just look at the indictment. and as far as i remember, it's on the first or second page. they call him a lobbyist. and this, in my opinion, is an indicator that a special prosecutor is investigating whether there was any wrongdoing? what exactly is the tax charge? this is a criminal

tax evasion charge, quite a significant one, and the problem with a tax case for any defendant is that it is based on documents rather than witness testimony. what did you confirm when you signed the documents that your accountant confirmed? i think it's important in this case to understand that all of this happened after he got sober, right? because during the whole tax period period he was a heavy drug user, but as he told the state court in delover last year when the plea deal fell apart, he had been on the hook for some time, so how many of the alleged offenses occurred during the period when he was not taking drugs, and this is important because sober people have no excuse, well it just says something about your state of mind, right, isn't it a mistake? yeah, i think any jury wants to understand what...

and i don't think it's often mentioned in detail when talking about what we're going through now joe biden is coming through and so recently there was a debate, people were shocked, it seems like the democratic donors are shocked, i talked to one of them who was really shocked, he didn't know that biden's health was compromised, and members of congress were very insistent that biden has given way to someone else and now he has released a letter that i believe was written by his son hunter saying i remain and hunter is reported to be in the white house he is his father's top advisor and you are kind of asking what is this and you say

that hunter biden will stand trial, yeah , it's probably better that your father is president when you're on trial, you know, i really can't, no, i'm just saying, you don't have to make those conclusions, but it's an important fact that he presented, this is an important fact, and i think what caught my attention is that... over the past couple of years, the white house has made many attempts to distance the president from his son, especially in terms of business. yeah, but now apparently they really kind of...

or that's what i liked about him, but you know, these are completely different circumstances, so he faces, and this charge potentially carries with it a prison sentence, right, yeah, guns and taxes, guns, right, interesting, so why do you think something important happened, it doesn't seem such a big deal, you reported on it, but in general it's not talked about very much. i think i would say that i was very proud of working at cbs for the investigative journalism that we did, whether it was a whistleblower or a laptop. , and i put a lot of effort, to get data from this laptop, which contained a very clear chain of evidence. as i learned in my

investigation, this is a mirror image of what was handed over to the fbi, and i felt it was important to understand the integrity. given that this laptop was described by a group of retired intelligence officers as a russian fake, true, and we went to great lengths to have a very respected group do a forensic analysis, this group had no political affiliations, was outside the establishment, in fact reliable group, excellent.

it's hard to believe that it took me 2 years to confirm the authenticity of this data, what does this mean? i think with all due respect to my former employer, i think there was an opportunity to confirm this story earlier, i think that's all i can say, but i verified the data on the first day because there were emails from no one knew that i knew me. all your typos, plus i lived near hunter biden, so i knew him, i just lived in washington, like you, so it's not that weird if you live in a small town, everyone knows everyone, but i knew that no one knew that i knew him, if you build a fake laptop, you won't put letters on there from

the fox host, it's too weird, so i knew right away that it was real, and i'm just... a little surprised it took you so long, i mean, you mean there were actually obstacles, i just think that i have a reputation for being quick and efficient, yes, but this story took it took 2 years and i'm glad it did, yeah, because i think it really changed the discussion, i wonder how you felt? did you feel that the company didn’t want you to do this? you know, i've always tried to be respectful of my former employers, and i told congress that there was tension with the biden investigation, especially when i kind of turned my attention to president biden, they didn't like it, sorry, you don't have to, i'm

not even talking specifically about cbs, it's that much. bad, which is just funny, because it's not a reporter's job to cover up for a politician, right, i'm just clarifying, have you ever thought about how small our world has become, you've been working 30 years or more to become, bigger, really? i know how long, but i'm not going for long, and you become, you know , probably the most famous investigative journalist, i'm not sure about that, but i would say it's true, or of course, you're in a two or... a three. the best, definitely, but one might think that in each news organization will say, "oh my god, catherine harwich is available, let's hire her, but you're independent." journalist, this is simply amazing, but it was my personal choice. i know, yes, but really, nbc in a normal world would have said, hey, we're not paying

$3 million a year for the work you do, but they didn't. isn't that weird? i think this is an indication of how much the market has changed. yes, i think this is the biggest indicator for me, i didn’t really understand how many changes have happened in the last 4 and a half years. when you you start to look at the numbers, you see that these large corporate organizations are essentially no longer the custodians of information, there is so much more on other platforms, and i truly believe in my heart that there is a place for investigative journalism there, people are just hungry for it , and one investigation we did, it has about 3 million views. this is a good, healthy number. our next project will focus on immigration and border issues. and i don't want to give

everything away, but we have a lot of good data about the way the department of homeland security violates federal regulations on a daily basis creates, i think, a significant security risk for many american citizens. and i think this really deserves a thorough investigation. yes, and this is a story that i can actually tell now, although it was difficult to tell before, i can't even get it, and i tried to get accurate numbers on how many people came to our country illegally in the last 4 years, the number ranges from 5 to 30 million. all these estimates seem to be reliable, and i have no idea which one is correct, but why can’t we get the real number at least here? i think the simple answer might be? with that, i don't know, but my assessment is the volume that we're talking about, i think it's the volume, so, but going back to

your point, i don't think there's a lot of transparency on this issue, i hope to bring in it's a little bit more transparency, so in your opinion, this is a very important story, 100%, yeah, i'm not just talking about how... what issues do american voters consider to be the main issues in this election cycle? i ask myself: i have information, i think that federal laws, federal rules at the border are being violated every day, i need to find out if this is really true, if this is really true, then why is it true? who's really losing in this equation? will the country become less safe or not? i don’t know the answers yet, but this is a completely natural question. and how does our bankrupt country pay for all these services? i, yes, i am a lot of questions, i absolutely agree, but you 're focused on the question of whether

the federal government is violating its own laws, federal employees, yes, and based on your investigation, are you close to the answer? i think, judging by our reports, everything says about this, it seems that this is exactly the case and... so my question is: do you know who was punished, who was suspended, who was fired, who was demoted ? and i believe the answer is from no one other than those reporting the problem. truth? don't make me reveal similarities, i want to stop you right now, i'm shocked, i mean, you know, but i think that's the kind of story you want to see, right, i just think. news consumers in this country have always encouraged me that they really understand the idea of ​​accountability,

they want to see it, they expect it, they demand it, when you do it, i think it can be very nice, you know, to shine a light, it it sounds old fashioned, but i want to shed light on an issue that is truly worthy and needs to be highlighted. it's strange to wake up and see how the things you know are under threat. did you ever think that freedom of speech in the usa would be in question? no, i couldn’t imagine the situation i’m in now, that’s for sure. well, we're rooting for you, we 're rooting for you. catherine harridge, thank you very much. russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, 24.

here in avdeevka they brought people down, there was terror, it’s flying, everything is flying here, guys, the war is real, people live here completely differently, you haven’t been offended here yet ours didn't come? during the last explosion , there were 18 people left here under the slabs, who are still lying there, god help me, oh, thank you, we just came here forever.