famous bastam, women are not simply stronger because they give birth to people, just yes, well life, of course, no, that it is simply, it must at some point allow another person to appear in its body, he grew for 9 months, i cannot imagine this, and i cannot, so she lies down and says: now is the very moment when i will give birth to a person, and there was a person in me for 9 months, he lived... i have a small living person, that is, she walked around with a person all the time, understand? can you imagine, a person in a woman alive, not just some organ, but just a living person inside you, he pushes there, imagine what is going on in a woman's head emotionally, then suddenly gives birth and says: this is him, and you, she takes it, well, we know each other in principle, good, good day, and what can then be done to a man stronger, cooler than the fact that a woman gave birth to a person, i just can't imagine, nothing, nothing, i really want you to understand me correctly. in general, there is no talk about

such a ban on abortions, this is not what we are talking about, we are talking about individual attention to each case, if i may say so, especially since we have world experience, very serious experience, abortions are completely prohibited, for example, in andorra, honduras, nicaragua, el salvador, malta, the philippines, the vatican, in a huge number of countries, abortions are prohibited, with the exception of cases, most often these are medical indications in venezuela, egypt, indonesia, iraq, iran, liechtenstein, micronesia, mauritania, the united arab emirates, algeria, brazil, bhutan, qatar, costa rica, mali, morocco, monaco, lithuania, nigeria, peru, poland, saudi arabia, uruguay, chile and many, many other countries, very cunningly these questions.

the united states canceled the right to terminate a pregnancy at the federal level adopted in 1973, that is, the state, it has abdicated responsibility for this act, that is, it is decided, it is decided by people living in this particular state, despite the promotion of values ​​in america.

today, in terms of the number of abortions, russia remains one of the world leaders. why is that? here is what he writes in his report demography, professor of moscow state university, doctor of sociological sciences, milekhin andrey vladimirovich. according to the un forecast, if current trends continue, by 201 the population of russia will decrease to 112.2 million people, which threatens the automatic rollback of the country to the level of an ordinary agrarian power, the loss of any chances for the formation of any significant, sovereign geopolitical contour, that is, in fact, exactly what those who want to destroy our country are trying to achieve, but only without any bombs, without blood, without violence. with their own hands, already on

this issue is being raised at the official level, listen to what our president's press secretary, dmitry sergeyevich peskov, is saying. it's getting smaller, we live in the largest country in the world, there are fewer of us every year, and this can only be dealt with by increasing the average birth rate, it's currently at a terribly low level, 1.4, this is comparable, comparable to european countries, to japan and so on, but this is catastrophic for the future of the nation, catastrophically low. think about it, 1.4, this is what peskov is saying, at the same time time, as for maintaining the population, at least at one level, the coefficient should be 2.1, almost twice, and why are we so calm about this

, because the level of decline in the population in our country is maintained precisely due to what, due to immigration, and this is how we ... family foundations have been preserved, and the remnants of the indigenous population will be assimilated by migrants, non-indigenous population assimilates migrants, what do we hope for, on the contrary, can this

suit us? i want to be correctly understood, it is naive to assume that, for example, by banning abortions we can solve the demographic problem, absolutely. but i am trying to approach this issue from a slightly different angle, because the danger is not in the abortion itself, the danger is in the flow, in the conveyor, in addiction, in the attitude towards this as a natural thing, in the lack of respect for that very life that has not yet appeared in the world, but it already exists, it is by god yes...

in everyday life we ​​have the right to lose this opportunity, that is, to stop someone else's life, let's see who is really promoting here this is a magical right to preserve absolute freedom of abortion in russia, for example, listen to what tamara edelman says, we already know her well, how she tries to kill...

in wild ways and is not accompanied by an offer of any other alternatives, that is, the only alternative is to simply give birth, give birth and give birth, they explain, oh, how good, this is, of course, your main goal in life, and if you don’t give birth, it will be terrible, how wonderful, how wonderful, then it turns out that these are diapers, that these are sleepless nights, that these are problems everywhere, from the moment of birth to the maternity hospital, where they bully you, yell at you and god...

and if we're talking about the horrific things that happened during the war and how after the war the front-line soldiers were not allowed to tell the truth, they created. i would give them a piece of the office and it would be written that such and such a deputy, here some

draft law appeared and immediately to them in the office, so if they said to adopt it immediately, then it should be forgotten forever, and if they don't say, it's a disaster, you can't touch it, it should be adopted in three readings at once, that's just it immediately, automatically, and you will notice what posters ms. edelman uses in her speech.

seemingly by chance, seemingly, seemingly by accident, seemingly nothing special, this is what we talk about all the time, this is what is about those who are ready to open the gates of the rebuilt fortress from the inside, and you listen to what the doctor of the university of toronto, the scientist writer ian garner, writes about our country, three sweet white children, another one is on the way, an icon. walls, dad serves in the navy, russia is full

this horrible ethno-nationalist, fascist iconography, i know that what i just said is being bleeped out, but i have no other words, i mean, think about it, a happy family of three children, the wife is expecting a fourth child, the father serves in the navy, the main family, judging by the icon on the wall, all this together, this bastard named ian gardner, calls fascist iconography, that is, a mockery of the last supper at the opening of the olympic games, transgenders who grimace in front of government officials of all the guests invited to opening of the olympic games in paris, a man called:

martin bormann, who said the following: the slavs must work for us, to the extent that we do not need them, they can die out. the reproduction of the slavs is undesirable, they can use contraceptives and have abortions. the more the better, and isn't that the answer? that is why after stalin issued a decree banning abortions in 1936, they were allowed for a time, you know, when during the great patriotic war, in the occupied territory of the german administration, it was the nazis who put this issue on the conveyor belt, to decide who should live, who should not live, who is needed , who is not needed, who is important, who is not important, listen to the interview with inna yambulatova, she is

the secretary of the hippocratic medical forum, we, unfortunately, due to... our timing, our time, cannot show it in its entirety, so we will show only fragments, but i highly recommend watching it in its entirety, well , there was a man with a mustache who believed that poor ugly schizophrenics should be sterilize, or better yet kill, and destroy in the bud those they conceived, as he said, well, actually, do you like this kind of morality, it was his fight, it was the third reich, yes, it was adolf hitler. it was the t4 program, by the way, a very serious program, t-4, which was ideologically justified, and actually implemented, moreover, the first concept of surrogate motherhood we encounter in t4, and when m forced insemination of a woman, one gives birth, the other is given to nurse, the third one is for education, i'm not sure that

many of those who broadcast today, should we pay poverty, that they would have survived in this program at all. under this program, the majority would have been destroyed. well, let's go back to history: stalin dies and my namesake, nikita sergeyevich khrushchev, on november 23, 1955, passes a decree lifting the ban on abortions. why did he do this? this is very interesting. look, there is evidence from one of our intelligence officers who worked in washington in the seventies, oleg vladimirovich pilipets, who received. former us ambassador to the soviet union hariman on july 18-23, 1955 , a meeting between khrushchev and western leaders took place in geneva. the us was then represented by dwight esenhower, england by prime minister anthony eden, and france by prime minister edgar faure. at

that meeting, the western partners issued a number of demands to the soviet union in order to improve relations with western countries, the three most important being the reduction of armed forces, condemnation of stalin's activities, lifting the ban on abortion, and how we we remember very well, all three demands were met, and the key demands were: arms reduction, that is, weakening... the country condemnation of stalin, that is, condemnation of the one who was the leader in the victory over fascist germany, extermination of the population through abortions, this is what we had to do in order to have the opportunity to sit in the hallway of one of

these three countries, and note that these countries themselves were in no hurry to settle the issue with. for example, abortions were legalized in great britain in 1967 year, in the united states in 1973, but in 2022 this law was repealed and is only allowed in certain states, and in france abortions were only allowed in 1975, what an amazing coincidence, so who is demanding from khrushchev.

which is largely true, but it turns out that this is not the only reason, look, south korea, the most prosperous country with a very powerful gdp, a prosperous country, as we know, at the same time, can you imagine that in 2023 in korea in south korea 57% of strollers were bought. for pets, with which happy couples stroll, only 43% for babies, in korea today the birth rate.

at the expense of the life of another, this is the desire of today's man to have everything at once, this is the artificiality into which our whole life is gradually turning, artificial intelligence, artificial meat, artificial men, artificial women, artificial distance learning, you can exist in this artificial world and feel great. i want to remind you of one small episode from... our film a few days from the life of oblomov about naturalness, look, his life is subordinated to the goal, work, not a single unnecessary

action, step, unnecessary word, here he is healthy, rich at 60 years old looks younger than you, and why, andrey, at 60 years old you need to look 60, and not 35, right, only then at 35 you don’t need to look 50 years old, like you? eh andrey, well , your gold miner will live another 100 years, earn another 100 shards, but why? everyone thinks only about how to eat, what is harmful, what is useful, which doctor to see for treatment, which waters to go to, everyone thinks only about how to live, and why, no one wants to think, and this is remarkably common. phrase: to live for yourself, and what does this mean? isn't this the very thing we have often talked about, this is when the quality of life

is determined by the quantity and quality of pleasures in this life, remember alisan sergeevich pushkin, who at 35 wrote these lines: "it's time, my friend, it's time, the heart asks for peace, days fly by and every hour takes away a piece of being, and you and i together assume to live, and look, we'll just die. didn't pushkin live for himself, creating his great works, including these constructions, because living for himself, it turned out that he lives for entire generations, and for centuries. well, okay, look, for example, students who are studying to be obstetricians and gynecologists, they are taught to do abortions in the sixth year. sub-residency, this is a mandatory stage of training, absolutely right, because there are circumstances in which they must be able to do everything, but with all that

, it seems to me that in the same academies there may be courses that teach a doctor to try help a woman preserve the fetus, and not just help get rid of it, because if it were, probably... there would not be such statistics as, for example, that in 30 years since 1991, only in state medical institutions, 50 million abortions were performed, think about this figure, from 1920, when abortions were allowed until 1991, according to very rough estimates, 180 million unborn children were hammered in, think about these figures, remember what the great dmitry mendeleev said, who

he was not only involved in chemistry but also in demography, he predicted that by the year 2000 russia should have at least 600 million citizens, he died in 1907, i could not imagine that just 13 years later, in 1920 , abortions would be allowed, from this year to 1991, 180 million would be killed, plus their children, and how many of them could have been great military leaders, writers, scientists, artists, doctors, and so on and so forth? i understand that this can be considered speculation, such, so to speak, emotional lyrics, but if we today we were not on the threshold of that catastrophe that the same one spoke about...

sudden birth, premature pregnancy, she is from central asia, accordingly, she does not have any compulsory medical insurance, insurance policy and all that, she was not registered, she ends up in the hospital, the child is born alive, a live birth, the team starts saving him, the headman comes a day later and starts blaming them for saving this child, then they come to the conclusion that...

one of the teams that arrived, who were called from the center prenatally, she asks: well, you do something with these children, she filled a syringe with magnesium and killed this child. so, what was proven by the forensic examination, the court sentenced them to a serious article by prior conspiracy, a group of people, and what did the doctors who spoke in defense of the doctor say, they said: yes, he is not alive anyway, and some tajik. yes, he, you saw these freaks, you understand, right? this was said by people who are called to save lives, they spoke about human life like that. and really, that is, look, it is happening a certain, as if professional deformation, when it becomes a stream, it becomes a conversion, it becomes habitual, it becomes natural, that is, the naturalness of abortion is equated with the naturalness of the birth of a child.

the demographic situation, which the president talks about, which scientists talk about , look at the problems that women who want to keep their child face, just as an example, listen, when she finished, let's say, the examination, she told me, what do you expect, you have a maximum everything is bad, you have a frozen pregnancy,

all the tests were done strangely. in favor of having an abortion, we went to all the possible nearest ultrasounds, we looked, and what did she tell me, don't worry, you 're fine, there was a weak heartbeat, it was quietly audible, but it was audible, i go into the office, i say, i need to register, then she went to examine me and said, like at your age you need to study, and you're like cutting children, maybe you should have an abortion after all, i say, no, well, i got pregnant with my second child, it started like with... at the beginning of pregnancy bleeding, went to the hospital to our head, she said: you need to have an abortion, she said, before you there was already such, they cleaned it, well, that's it, the child was born, after 2 weeks my bleeding stopped, everything is normal, the child was born 4.800, 56 cm, it turns out they did an ultrasound, to which she told me that there is a dense egg, there is no embryo, the embryo is not developing, supposedly

you are most likely over... pregnancy, we are yumasheva, there they did an ultrasound for me, they say, that's it, we went to another clinic on admiral normal, the baby's heartbeat is audible, this is what the geneticist says, look, hello, i am a geneticist, a gynecologist, the crisis line save a life, we analyzed the work of the line from june to september 2020, out of nineteen calls from pregnant women with fetal pathology, only four had valid indications for termination of pregnancy, the remaining 15 women were sent for an abortion without any indications, these are the problems that arise between psychologists who are called to do their job and some doctors, listen, over the course of a year, doctors at the women's clinic at the central city hospital did not send a single woman to us, and for...