"i really want you to understand me correctly, there is no talk at all about such a ban on abortions, that is not what we are talking about, we are talking about individual attention to each case, if i may say so, especially since we have world experience, very serious experience, abortions are completely banned, for example, in andorra, honduras, nicaragua, el salvador, malta, the philippines, the vatican in a huge number of countries." are banned, except for exceptional cases, most often these are medical indications in venezuela, egypt, indonesia, iraq, iran, liechtenstein, micronesia, mauritania, the united arab emirates, algeria, brazil, bhutan, qatar, costa rica, mali, morocco, monaco, lithuania , nigeria, peru, poland, saudi arabia, uruguay, chile and many, many others.

these issues are very cleverly resolved in the united states of america, by the way, in the country whose representatives wrote our constitution, as well as with the death penalty, which is allowed in some states. abortions are prohibited in some states, for example, in alabama, arkansas, louisiana, missouri, oklahoma, tennessee, texas, south dakota and others. states. in america, since 2020. the second year , the supreme court of the united states has overturned the right to terminate a pregnancy at the federal level adopted in 1973, that is , the state, it has abdicated responsibility for this act, that is, it is decided, it is decided by the people living in this particular state, despite the promotion of lgbt values ​​​​in america. in the countries of the civilized world, at

the same time, those same farmers who feed america, they continue to live by their own laws, this, by the way, can become a reason for very serious problems inside the united states itself. elder paisios the holy mountaineer, a monk of mount athos who was canonized in the russian orthodox church in 2015, said that when the state takes responsibility for committing an abortion, then the lord punishes the entire nation, and when the state renounces making this decision, then the sin falls on the specific person who committed it, but in our country this issue is not regulated in any way, despite the fact that, by and large , we are facing a very serious demographic problem, remember, we talked about this: in one of our issues.

today, in terms of the number of abortions, russia remains one of the world leaders. why is that? here is what andrey vladimirovich milekhin, professor at moscow state university and doctor of sociological sciences, writes in his report demography. according to the un forecast, if current trends continue, by 201 the population of russia will decrease to... 112.2 million people, which threatens the country's automatic rollback to the level of an ordinary agrarian power , the loss of any chance of forming any significant sovereign state. geopolitical contour, that is, in fact , exactly what those who want to destroy our country are trying to achieve, but only without any bombs, without blood, without violence with their own hands,

this issue is already being raised at the official level, listen to what our president's press secretary dmitry sergeyevich peskov says: every year there are fewer of us, we live in the largest country in the world, there are fewer of us every year, and this can only be dealt with by increasing the average birth rate, which is where we are now.

almost twice, and why are we so calm about this? because the level of population decline in our country is maintained precisely due to what? due to emigration and this somehow relaxes us, if you just look at the numbers. here is what alexander senelnikov, professor of the department of sociology, family and demography, sociology faculty of moscow state university, says about this. listen, the extinction of a people can occur over several centuries, but long before it dies out, its territory will inevitably be populated by people from other countries, in in which family values ​​are more firmly preserved, and the remnants of the indigenous population will be assimilated by migrants, the non-indigenous population will assimilate migrants, which is what we hope for, on the contrary, can this

suit us? i want to be understood correctly, it is naive to assume that, for example, a ban on abortions can solve... the demographic problem, absolutely not, but i am trying to approach this issue from a slightly different angle, because the danger is not in the abortion itself, the danger is in the flow, in the conveyor belt, in getting used to the attitude towards this as a natural thing, to the lack of respect for that very life that has not yet come into being. but it already exists, it is given by god, that is what we are talking about, in this there is, in my opinion, just disrespect not only for someone else's life, disrespect for ourselves, how many families beg god, doctors, shamans

for the opportunity to have a child, for some reason they do not succeed, at the same time, having received this opportunity... we have the right to lose this opportunity in a completely everyday way, that is, to stop someone else's life, let's see who is really promoting this magical right to preserve absolute freedom of abortion in russia, for example, listen to what tamara edelman says, we already... familiar, how she tries to convince us of what needs to be done? in the thirty-sixth year , abortions that were done on the initiative of a woman were generally prohibited, but i had a relative who died as a result of a criminal abortion, after this

law was passed, but we see how today completely barbaric propaganda is being carried out, and propaganda against abortion, which actually makes perfect sense. but it is carried out in wild ways and is not accompanied by any other alternatives, that is , the only alternative is to simply give birth, give birth and give birth, they explain: oh, how good, this is, of course, your main goal in life, and if you don’t give birth, it will be terrible, how wonderful, how wonderful, then it turns out that these are diapers, that these are sleepless nights, that these are problems everywhere, from the moment of birth to the maternity hospital, where you... give birth, and further, further, further kindergarten, school, problems, problems, problems, and there is no talk about this, because if we talk about this, suddenly someone will not want to give birth, well, we

know this lady, tamara-ulman, remember, we talked about her, glory to ukraine, to the heroes, glory, death to the cursed enemies. the history of victory day must be talked about today, and if we talk about it, then about the horrific things that happened during the war, and about how after the war the front-line soldiers were not allowed to tell the truth, they created tame veterans who constantly talk about what is happening, who have long forgotten how it was in fact. you know, i would do such an artistic experiment, for example, i would choose in the state...

at first glance the theme is clear and correct: men defend their homeland, their parents,

children, they are our heroes, but how will a woman, a mother, perceive this picture, today save the child, do not have an abortion, and tomorrow he will go to war, so what is this, a mistake of the performer or an order, and who benefits from this, do they feel some kind of specific very psychological impact? on such a subconscious level, seemingly without meaning, it seems like, it seems like it's just by chance, it seems like nothing special, this is what we talk about all the time, this is what is about those who are ready to open the gates of the rebuilt fortress from the inside, and you listen to what the doctor of the university of toronto, scientist, writer ian garner writes about our country, three cute white children. one is on the way, icons on the walls, dad serves in the navy, russia

is full of this terrible ethno-nationalist, fascist iconography, i know that what i just said is beeping, but i have there are no other words, that is, think about it, a happy family of three children, the wife is expecting a fourth child, from... serves in the navy, an orthodox family, judging by the icon on the wall, all this together, this bastard named ian gardner, calls fascist iconography, that is, a mockery of the last supper at the opening of the olympic games, transgenders who grimace in front of government officials of all the guests invited to the opening of the olympic games in paris. men calling themselves women in the boxing ring, who

they beat real women, swimmers who hide their genitals because they stick out and so on, that's all normal, but a family with white children, with a pregnant wife and a military father icons - these are fascists, that is , you understand to what level it reaches... hysteria about you and me, among those who do not want us to exist in this world at all, and i will prove it to you once again now, pay attention that the interest is only in us, in russia, not in brazil, not in poland, where the laws against abortions are much more serious, so to speak, it is in russia, why? that's exactly where we come back to the question that i... asked a little earlier, because even the war that's going on in ukraine today, it follows the testament of, you know who,

and the fuhrer's personal secretary, martin bormann, who said the following: the slavs should work for us, to the extent that we don't need them, they can die out. the reproduction of the slavs is undesirable. they can use contraceptives. and have abortions, and the more the better, and is n't that the answer? that's why after stalin issued a decree banning abortions in 1936, they were allowed for a time, you know, when during the great patriotic war in the occupied territories of the german administration, it was the nazis who put this issue on the conveyor belt to decide. who should live, who should not live, who is needed, who is not needed, who is important, who

is not important, listen to the interview with inna yambulatovy, this is the secretary of the hippocratic medical forum, we, unfortunately, due to the timing of our time, cannot show it in its entirety, so we will only show fragments, but i highly recommend watching it in its entirety, well there was a man with a mustache who believed that... poor ugly schizophrenics should be sterilized, or better yet killed, and those they conceived should be destroyed in the bud, as he said, well , actually, do you like this kind of morality, it was his fight, it was the third ray. yes, it was adolf hitler, it was the t-4 program, by the way, a very serious program, t-4, which was ideologically justified, and actually implemented, moreover, we encounter the first concept of surrogate motherhood it is in t-4, when there is forced insemination of a woman, one gives birth, another

is given to nurse, a third to raise, so i am not sure that many of those who are broadcasting today whether poverty should be alleviated. that they would have survived in this program at all, most would have been destroyed. well, let's go back to history: stalin dies, and my namesake, nikita sergeyevich khrushchev , on november 23, 1955, issues a decree lifting the ban on abortions. why did he do this? this is very interesting. look, there is evidence from one of our intelligence officers, who worked in washington in the seventies, oleg vladimirov. pilipets, who received from the former united states ambassador to the soviet union, harriman. on july 23, 1955 , a meeting took place in geneva between khrushchev and western leaders. the united states was then represented by dwight esenhower, england by prime minister anthony

eden, france by prime minister edgar faure. at that meeting, the western partners.

and were in no hurry to resolve the issue of abortion, for example, in great britain abortions were legalized in 1967, in the united states in 1973, but in 2022 this law was abolished and allowed only in certain states, and in france abortions were allowed only in 1975, look at what an amazing coincidence, so - who demands that khrushchev in 1955 allow abortion, who writes our constitution in 1993, in which the protection of human rights begins with his birth, but not before, and it is very interesting, how do they justify, say, the absence of children and the unwillingness to have them in

today's world, to breed poverty, bad conditions, nothing to live on, which is largely fair, but it turns out, not only this is the reason, look, south korea, the most prosperous country with a very powerful gdp, a prosperous country, as we know, at the same time, can you imagine that in 2023 in korea in south korea were bought... 57% of strollers for pets, with which happy couples walk, only 43% for a baby. in korea today , the birth rate is 0.72. this is the lowest in the world in one of the most prosperous countries.

how can we explain this? i do not know, but it seems to me that this is hypertro. egoism humanity, the greed to share benefits with someone new, the desire to improve personal life at the expense of the life of another, this desire of today's man to have everything at once, this is the artificiality into which our whole life is gradually turning, artificial intelligence, artificial... artificial men, artificial women, artificial distance learning, you can exist in this artificial world and feel great, i want to remind you of one small episode from our film a few days in the life of oblomov about naturalness, look, his life

is subordinated to the goal, to work, not a single unnecessary action, step, unnecessary word, here he is healthy, rich, at 60 years old he looks younger than you, and why, andrey, at 60 years old you need to look 60, and not 35, right, only then at 35 you don’t need to look 5? like you, ah andrey, well , your gold miner will live another 100 years, earn another 100 fragments, but why? everyone thinks only about how to eat, what is harmful, what is useful, which doctor to be treated by, which waters to go to, everyone thinks only about how to live, but why? no one wants to think. and this is a wonderful common phrase: to live for oneself, and what does that mean? isn't it the very thing we 've talked about quite often, that the quality of life

is determined by the quantity and quality of pleasures in this life. remember aleksandr sergeevich pushkin, who wrote these lines at the age of 35: "it's time, my friend, it's time, the heart asks for peace, days fly by, taking away a piece of existence, and you and i together assume to live, and look, we'll just die. didn't pushkin live for himself, creating his great works, including these are strict, because living for himself, it turned out that he lives for entire generations, and for centuries. well, okay , look, for example, students who are studying to be obstetricians and gynecologists, they are taught. does abortions in the sixth year of sub-internship, this is a mandatory stage of training, absolutely right, because there are circumstances in which they must be able

to do everything, but with all this, it seems to me that in the same academies there may be courses that teach a doctor to try to help a woman save the fetus, and not just help from get rid of it, because if... it were, probably, there would not be such statistics as, for example, that in 30 years, since 1991, only in state medical institutions, 50 million abortions were performed, think about this figure, from 1920, when abortions were allowed until 1991, very roughly.

13 years in the twentieth year abortions will be allowed, from this year until ninety-one 180 million will be killed, plus their children, and how many great military leaders, writers, scientists, artists could have been among them, doctors and so on and so forth. i understand that this can be considered speculation, so to speak, emotional lyrics, but if we were not standing today on the threshold of that catastrophe...

which revealed a terrible problem: deformation, amorality, moral degradation was of monstrous force manifested precisely in this case. the essence of the case was that the woman who was admitted, sudden birth, premature pregnancy, she is from central asia, accordingly, she does not have any compulsory medical insurance, insurance policy and all the rest, she does not was registered, she gets to the hospital, the child is born alive. alive, the team starts saving him, the headman comes a day later and starts accusing

them of saving this child. then they come to the conclusion that one of the teams that arrived, who were called from the center prenatally, she asks her, but how do you deal with these children? she filled a syringe with magnesium and killed this child. so, what was proven by the court, the court sentenced them to a serious article according to the preliminary agreement a group of people, and what did they say at the same time the doctors who spoke in defense of the doctor, they said, yes, he doesn’t regret it anyway.

day and the child, you tell me, well, well, well, of course, it’s natural, but for a surgeon who operates every day, what for the average person is horror, nightmare, blood, scary, for a surgeon it’s commonplace, it’s natural, yes, of course, for a surgeon it’s natural , commonplace, right, but his activity is aimed at saving someone, and not at killing, there is a small difference here, although practically from the point of view of physical actions, it’s all very similar, one on another. it's amazing, you see, in this situation, demographic, which the presidents talk about, which scientists talk about, you look at the problems that women who want to keep their child face, just by example, listen, when she finished, let's say, the examination, she told me, what are you expecting, everything is as bad as possible for you, you have a frozen

pregnancy? it's strange, all the tests were done in favor of having an abortion, we went to all the possible nearest ultrasounds, we looked, to which she told me: no don't worry, everything is fine with you, the heartbeat was weak, it was quiet, but it was audible, i go into the office, i say, i need to register, then she went to examine me and said, like at your age you need to study, and you 're giving birth to children, maybe you should have an abortion after all, i say, no, well, i got pregnant with my second child. i started bleeding from the very beginning of the pregnancy, i went to the hospital to see our head doctor, she said, i need to have an abortion, she said: there was one like this before you, they cleaned it out, well, that's it, the baby was born, in 2 weeks my bleeding passed everything is normal, the child was born 4.800, 56 cm, it turns out they did an ultrasound to which she told me that there is a dense egg, there is no embryo, the embryo is not developing. allegedly

you most likely have a frozen pregnancy, we went to another clinic on admiral yumashov, there he is, they did an ultrasound for me, they say everything is normal, the baby's heartbeat is heard, this is what the geneticist says, look, hello, i am a geneticist, gynecologist, crisis line save a life, we analyzed the work of the line from june to september 2020, out of nineteen requests from pregnant women with pathology: yes, only four had valid indications for termination of pregnancy, the remaining 15 women were sent for abortion without any indications, these are the problems that arise between psychologists who are called to do their job and some doctors, listen, in a year, doctors at the women's consultation at the central city hospital have not sent a single woman to us, and even for social assistance, i'm not even talking about psychological assistance,

and we ... in the corridor, that is, our specialist i have to consult a woman in the corridor, and the attitude of the doctors has not changed, that is, the doctors are still negatively disposed towards our work, as they tell us, you come here, you go there and somewhere dissuade on the approach to us, they have already come to us, they have already decided everything, we have already put on gloves, we have already set ourselves up, and you came to dissuade them, when you hire doctors, by what criteria do you select them, and she said this thing, i remember it right away: he said, i do not hire gynecologists who refuse to perform abortions, we have psychologists sit and consult women, but uh, women don’t get in, they bypass our office, for a small example of october, in 17 days of october, 20 women were sent by you for a medical abortion and not one of them went through our psychologist, there is such information, if we confirm it anywhere, if you want, well, what if?