>> commissioner clay. >> present >> commissioner walker. >> present >> commissioner yee. >> vice president over stone >> present. we have chief scott from the police department and acting executive director for the police accountability. >> thank you and welcome to our june 12, 2024 meeting. we have a full roster up here.

minus one. commissioner benedicto who is missed. before we we start the meeting welcome our newest member. and welcome our returning old champ here to my left. start with nowest member and give him a minute to introduce himself then our old favorite veteran, commissioner walk and then we will begin. >> welcome. >> i'm sorry have you to sit between those 2. >> thank you, madam president. good evening i'm a former private practice practition and former united states attorney. i have done a lot in my career and i'm happy to be here to serve and look forward to seeing everyone. thank you. welcome. we are glad you are here taking that seat. commissioner walker, welcome back. we missed you. >> i missed everybody it is

grit to be back. i'm look forward to working on if any up projects and working on very excitingil make a commissioner report but i missed you all a lot. i got a lot of art projects done. >> we will benefit from that. the world will. >> we are up here we have a full. let's start before i get in trouble by the city attorney. sergeant >> weekly officer recognition certificate officer gone above in the performance of duties. officer dennis 1339, traffic company jury room good evening president elias, commissioners. chief scott and acting

directorful members i'm david o'connor acting director of the traffic company. it is my honor and pleasure to be here presenting you this recognition. the officer is a 17 year vet ravent police department. dedicated and hard working member of the traffic company. >> the commission knows traffic company performs many duties and provide the services citywide. engage in city stratospheric enforcement. support the first amendment activities. provide expert motorcade for visiting presidents. vice presidents and other heads of state. and performing the important duty of documenting and investigating series traffic collisions. including fatal traffic collisions in the collision investigation unit.

officer dennis has been a hard working member of the traffic company performing his duty in thes most professional manner. and maintains a very positive outlook. the officer participated in many enforcement operations and first amendment activities. escorts and many major traffic collision investigations. it is one of the violation i would like to highlight today. >> the officer played a vital role in the identification and arrest of a suspect in a fatal hit and run traffic collision. in december 2023, a hit and run occurred in which two vehicles struck a pedestrian. both fled the scene. the pedestrian su.commed to injuries. the officer and others responded conduct investigation in the

incident. video was not the best quality and identifying the vehicle was going to be difficult this did not deterpatrol traffic officer dennis in the investigations in solving the case. due to the efforts of several department members the driver. vehicle two was located and arrest on the same day as the incident. driver of vehicle one remained outstanding and did not verndz to law enforcement. the officer wetreturned the scene of the collision later. in hopes the suspect might have a routine. >> arms with detail, about the suspect and the vehicle the

officer observed the intersection in hopes of finding the suspect o. that day due to his investigative work, the subject in vehicle matching the vehicle were located and identified. that subject was arrestd and charged in the fatal hit and ruvenl played an important role -- in this investigation. without his efforts the suspect might never have been identified. yesterday, the officer was the participate in a major investigative development in a separate hit and run investigation. further testament to his hard work. for the reasons the officer has been identified for this recognition. with that i like to briefly read a portion of the certificate.

san francisco police department recognizes the officer 1339 of the traffic company for officer of the week. demonstrated lieu policing practices and inspiring greatness exetch fighting the yessed of police officers as guardians of the community an example is worthy of high e steam by san francisco. and it is san francisco police departmentful upon with that i present officer dennis. [applause] >> hello, congratulations and welcome. >> thank you. i like to give you an opportunity to say a few word fist you want if not. >> this it is i collaborative effort. doug and jason and kenny did most of the work i was there to help out. i like to thank them.

also. make sure everyone is safe is important that's why i do what i do. >> the question is, if you live in the city which high school did you go to? >> consideration. thank you for your service the traffic company is a unit that is over looked and vital to the city temperature has been vital in meeting mission gerow goals and the things you deal with out on the road. i want to thank you for your service and dedication. i'm receiving this award. i'm going to turn over to keith to say a few words >> thank you and officer, thank you. when the commission started doing this, it gives us an

opportunity to recognize what is often times unsung work that the public does in the hear about. . traffic collisions are devastate to families. your follow up and your effort on the case as provided some comfort to the people impacted by this. and not only that i want to point out to the commission and the public that while in route to this commission hearing the officer and lieutenant o'connor and commander jones actually saved somebody from over dosing. speaks to who they are. appreciate your work. >> thank you, chief. commissioner yee. >> thank you. >> thank you, president elias. thank you again, commends you for your service.

and keeping us safe and putting closure to the family that lost that was fatal hit and run. thank you againful keeping us safe day in and out. sometimes we don't say that enough in the traffic department. congratulations to you receiving this certificate. continue your good work in the city. >> thank you. >> vice president. >> officer, thank you very much for your service to the city. i think that the specific ings dent thatllowllow oshg connor highlight suspend the work that the traffic company does. and i think it would remiss not to mention you are doing this work a time we are under investing in the work the traffic company does this puts strain on the officers who are remaining to dot job meant to be done by more people.

i hope that stories like the one we heard tonight inspire some to invest more in the traffic company. as we know we have seen enormous carnage on the roadways and could benefit for more great officers like yourself doing important workday in and day out. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> sergeant. >> any member would like to make public regarding line item one approach the podium. there is no public comment. >> general public comment the public can address the commission on items that are not on the agenda went subject jurisdiction of the police commission. neither police or personnel nor

commissioners are required respond to questions but may provide a brief responseful you may submit comment e mailing the police commission or written comments sent postal service to the public safety building. if you would like to comment, please, approach the podium. >> >> i'm going to keep my glass hollywood. will be for the chief mostly tonight. >> but you are watching hollywood. hollywood it is funny tonight you have mad max. sky walker, no. it is fiction. let's see. okay. you know what i mean [inaudible]

the movie [inaudible] the but there are people which want to control the world not really humans. don't believe anything. it is fiction. okay. chief. i told you last year that if it is not your job let alone your duty to wear a rambo flag. rainbow symbolize. [inaudible]. why because the rainbow is [inaudible]. you can't find it. if you do you are you [inaudible] you walk in the in a world of fiction. it is not a good idea.

i didn't understand him. the -- i will tell you about a hero. jane warner. was the chief of the patrol specials. her beat was the castro. the powerhouse that be said, hey. it is wonderful to have a

lesbian in the castro. she did fantastic work. the cops 8 the patrol specials used to be hundreds. the one in the back room wearing stars. now we are down to 3-4 patrol special units. in the whole city. when they do? walk a beat. how long since you saw a cop walk a beat. 9 years on valencia and have not seen one. i saw one on a bicycle once and told him to get off the sidewalk and the bike lane he will told me to minds my own business. >> [inaudible] this is pretty important, elias, give me my time back i want your attention. okay. halloween a million in the castro.

what happens? the cops come overwhelm and gift lady on the beat the patrol special on the beat a ticket for jay walking for being in the street in the middle of a million people >> time passes and dying of cancer. we complained for years the union is giving us racist homo phobic cops and so, what -- thank you. i turned you off you have turn minute its is time for the next

person. >> good evening commission and others. i'm chris word-kline i handed out the draft resolution presented yesterday and numerous commissioners during the last 6 plus weeks. access to public health system illegally begin on folks domestically and internationally that needs to be removed immediately. we are talking about system that use algorithms work with voice and phone technology. with this technology a person

could influence a fortunate say the wrong thing at the wrong time in front of the wrong audience and used to influence a police officer to use his gun. or used remote it have a driver run a red light to increase revenue for the city this happened before when voice and phone system used to influence the shooting of the mayor and supervisor and influence the jim jones incident. this technology is military grade and can cause injury and death in the wrong hands. now as a department of defense protecting san francisco, we are asking the police commission and the department to start calling other states and ask for a truths to stop this civil war in

the united states. >> read the draft resolution and w with the board of supervisors, mayor and city attorney to finalize the resolution and allow our city to breathe again special move forward. thank you. >> i like to use the over head. >> i made up complaint to the police accountability. i was here last time. bringing up to the person that was sitting in the back. there is an officer named paul ready. i have a restraining order against someone. and it is the california penal code 422.

and they were all met terrorist threats. that person was served. officer ready paul ready is my investigator. i talked with him several times. been down there banging on the door saying get the guns from the person that threatened me. were the she was served the threat the all of the stuff in here she threatened to use the guns to end my life left along other threat in year. officer ready said he filed the report with the da. >> they were it was denied. what about the guns, denied the penal code said she did all the things. i said if i go down and find out you made this report he said i did, ms. brown.

and i went down to the da's office. they say hee did not write anything. i gave him the case number. he did nothing he loyaled to me and stringed me along and i believe it is conspiracy. the person said i will not get away with temperature the point is, paul ready did not do anything he said he would do. he needed to be investigated. i'm scared i made this police department and i'm scared of retaliation i did make a police department. this is my right. my life was threatened. and i did all the proper procedures. and nais the end of public

comment. >> item 3 consent receive and file action sfpd and dpasb141 and the monthly report. >> motion to accept and file. >> second. >> member of the public withhold like to make comment on item 3. approach the podium. there is no public commentful commissioner clay. >> yes. >> commissioner walker. >> yes. >> commissioner benedicto.

>> ian yessir? >> yes. >> commissioner yee >> yes >> vice president carter >> yes. >> president elias. >> yes >> chief's report discussion public safety occurrence,o view of events in san francisco having an impact on public safety. >> thank you. thank you. good evening. commissioner, welcome commissioner clay and carter. and good evening to the public. start everstart is thissing week's chief's report i will start with an over view on crime trends in all part one crime is down 30%. about 7,000 few are crimes than this time last year. break down violet crime is 33% reduction year to date.

that is about 7,000 and about 300 crimes. car break in's down 51 pvrms homicides down 36 pvrms 14 compared to 22. and total gun violence is down 36%. very good trends mid year. in terms of major ins debts one homicide this week that was on the 500 block of delores right at delores park the fifth of john. victim and witness were on a park bench had two subjects approached the victim and argued with the victim. one pulled out a gun and shot the victim and the subject fled. that investigation is being investigated bier homicide unit and no arrests.

it is an on going investigation. if you have information call. you can remain unanimous. there was a criminal shooting week that was at the 100 block of howard in qatar valon the third of june at 12:17 a.m. the victim exited the car when they were hit by gunshots the victim transported himself to the hospital that is under investigation. other shooting was not believed to be criminal it was a suicide that occurod bernett avenue and 20th boulevard at 2:28 p.m. the victim committed suicide. the investigation indicate third degree was a suicide. >> company other critical incidents to speak of overnight weekends we had a number of not

drivingentses. side shows in the city. one beginning saturday. with motorcycles in the bay vow and the other 3 were saturday night, sunday morning over night and the span of 40-45 minutes. first at 1:15 a.m. the acting night captain was monitoring the highway patrol radio. dispatched and heard a side show was forming in oak land. that captain mobilized our stunt driving response officers and deployed in places they believe the drivers would come as they acrossed the bridge. we were able to prevent that side show from happening at 13th street in south van ness arrest and they were around 200 cars

that attempted asemble there. however, they went in different dreksz at 4 a.m. san francisco park rangers called and advised 150 vehicles at embarcadero at washington lighting fires and doing doughnuts in a crowd in the intersection. one vehicle caught fire or set on fire. the sfpd officers arrived they were assaulted with object it is including explosives and lazars. for the public lasers are dangerous can cause permanent eye. budget. the fire department upon put out a car far. they had trouble get nothing because of the crowds. assisted by standing by as they put the fire out. officers acted as a protective

force as the crowd did what i described. officers broke update crowd and cars. in multiple directions and the car on fire was destroyed. i don't know claims ownership. auto2:50 a.m. our dispatch was broadcast multiple cars gone to al men and he upon geneva. officers responded there broke that you want group and fled. as they flew objects at the officers.

moving forward we have a side show protocol or stunt driving protocol and for the public. primary folk susto break it up quickly as possible. very dangerous activity. easy to get in pursuits when criminal activity is occurring.

our officers have been traind and instructed break them up first if we seize cars at the site we will. tactics allow that and do it safely. the main priority is to break them up we were able to do on each one of these. however, it was a strain on resource. all the over night officers were working on this. >> i will keep the commission summertime is busy with the events. we are communitying to make sure we work with others to break these up. the same time the last thing there were several of the event in thes city oak labldz and possibly other cities. it was a busy night with the units. other events and major incidents stabbing at this was unknown location. officers were energid down by

individuals regarding a standpointing. they did not know where this fight happened and the victim was stabbed. that was an active investigation >> was a significant armed robbery at 5200 block of diamond heights. security guard witnessed 3 people come in the store and attempt to take a cart if you feel merchandise. the security guards tried to detaint subject. 1 brandished air fireman and assaulted the guard and fled from the store that is an investigation on going. with that, just to update you on our retail theft. we have arrested over 400 this year alone with the blitz

operations, they are going good. retail theft grant city received get used and the operations are funded by this grant. those are going goodd and have a website for the public, if you have a business and would like you to come in if the blitz operation can be helpful, retail theft if you sends an e mail our burglar unit will will evaluate and be in contact. have been successful. so that my time is up that will conclude my report. >> thank you. >> chief. thank you, again for bring look

at the crime rates coming down staying at minus 30%. the guys are doing the right thing out there. hopefully you can continue and keep crime down. regarding to the stunt driving. came across from oak land, so, you have probably lead twheem they expected to arrive in san francisco? >> yes that initial group that came cross we were aware and activated the officers. they worked like it was supposed to. unfortunate consequence they split up. instead of the one major event we had 3 significant events around the same time >> my follow up in would be

regarding to i guess application of. the drones. i gchls hopping from location to location. . i guess add van teenagesous to have drones and out of them making sure they are out of the city before releasing the stunt team? >> the air support of the yes. air support is very helpful to manage to get a handle on theseentses. you know cities that have air support drones or helicopters. you can set up perimeters and make its easier. under the current passage of prop e. language in about a criminal

investigation. the events are criminal. the number of crimes including this and surrender vandalisms. i wonder if chp was called. >> we did community with chp, they were busy on the verge on the other side of the bridge had they formed up there were a number of interactions with them that resulted in pursuits. there was communication. they did not come to the city side. they were active and business that night as well. >> thank you very much, chief. >> commissioner? >> thank you, thank you for the transport is good and promising to see the trend bunkham, right,

reduced crime. >> in the areas feels like the cordination and the investment and resources targeted investments have been having an impact. i wanted ask you a question around the policing in the tenderloin.

dollar is good news with the collaborative i spoke to the commission about this. public w and public health and homelessness and supportive housing and human services part

of the drug market agency collaborative. and the some of the nonprofits one code tenderloin. i have gone out with them and saw them in action. they -- are doing an amazing job engaging with the people who have a type of substance disorder. enforcement is a component with code tenderloin worked well with the police department, they have had success. and traction with getting people to go to that service door. and public health has stepped it up in march, they piloted putting medical staff on call basically. when code tenderloin goes out, they engage and there is a number they call with the doctor and get -- access to a doctor.

and access if they are willing to do it to medication to deal with the addiction. pilot has been successful. extremely. so, as i said earlier, enforcement is one part. we will continue to enforce the services piece is not something as far as of the jail piece but the way this group including the police department is working with the service providers that piece holdses promise inform the 3 months they have been doing t. a number of people. i think 50 or so -- actually got off the street and in shelter.

need get foam a better place with treatment. this is the last thing i will say. it alleviates the officers having that responsibility because the service providers are out this in the street. code tenderloin and they are people who have been down what road. i know how to speak to people that are suffering. it is work. that is great development that was something i was hoping for. now. does this mean that in lieu of an arrest people are upon begin this option? or is it -- kinds of a part of

the arrest procedure? the way we done officers we do scouting reports we'll see where people are congregating to use. code tenderloin will do their thing if there are other providers street medicine time at night. they the do what they do and we may have an enforcement operations in another location. we have locations that are -- a problem and didn't service thing and everything we can do and so those other locations where enforcement is we have done all and given the opportunity now enforcement. it is trying to strike a balance. so enforcement is a part of that it is not -- go to jail or there.

we find is when these night navigators, when they go out. sometimes we are there and no. >> that's great this . sounds like a harm reduction strategy. first is we are going to mandate stream or offer treatment if once people are detained. i love to hear more about the impact and out come when we have

more information. i read there was, there is a gift of a million dollars that is coming to the department at some point once approved by the board. i want to see, or hear if you know the process is for those district stagsz. i know it will be for the well being of the officers. i think they have been work hard and double over time vivs for a couple years. had is important. and really will helpful. anything that could be don enhance their opportunity to be in a better place physically special emotionally. is there an idea how this resource will be utilize the or how the stations will be developing a work plan. >> there is, that -- million dollars that was anounsd.

two years ago. the foundation has been set up. we don't, it is in the our foundation. we had once a year we had to reset our foundation. so. this foundation the donor will donate upon or anyone who wants to donate donate to the foundation. but the donor is when he made the announcement almost two years ago that mission was to be divided. go to the 10 district stations. the internal process is, the captains the plan of how they intends to spend the money they will be granted. when it getses to the police.

the accept and extend. we will do the same we always had to do when we receive donation. that is to get the except and extend approved. foundation, accept and extend. and use the money for the purposes that the donor intends today. >> we have not received any of that money yet. upon which time captains start making their requests, it will go through me to the foundation. they approve and the money gets donated and we go throughout process we currently have. >> a time line when that will be approved or authorized for to you implement y. foundation has been set up. now we have the process in place

with the grant requests. and thecrament ain'ts have been adviseed look how they plan to use the funding >> within the next couple months. come for approvals. >> great. >> thank you for those updates. >> thank you. >> commissioner walker >> thank you. >> thank you, i want top applaud the work that you are doing with the other departments. i have done down a couple times to meet with code tenderloin folks to seat work they are doing. there is a need for that response out there. you know when i did the first one in the ain't ain't we had to wait for an hour and a half. by that time they are not

interested anymore. having a good team of people who have been what is going on and know the folks there, too, it is a good partnership to irrelevant fill in the gap. great. thank you. >> vice president overstone >> chief, wanted to follow up with one question on something commissioner young asked the million dollar donation. the foundation that was reasonable established to overwhelm seat dispursement of upon stundz everfunds. remember are combvent board members on that undz momation >> >> i don't obviously so. i'm pretty sure lawyer is no

former did the chief or anyone play a legal --. i don't believe soichl i didn't and don't believe. we have been communicating with the people that are starting this board in terms of the process. the donation was announced two years ago. the foundation and the people that >>. thank you. >> am sergeant. anyone withhold like to make public comment, approach the podium.

i'm concerning my son murder 2006 a 250,000 reward for the catcher of the perpetrators. i bring this bear me paper with me i know who killed her son. gavin newsom said the da know who killed their son. he is serious. can name individuals. home addresses. but except there are no witnesses. these other vehicles he is talking about. thomas hahn batch peris movet. andrew. anthony. were these other names at 850 brievenl on my son's folder. they were going to will shoot

they turned the guns on my son. i have been coming here asking for remember justice for my son. we have done, zero dollars paid out for a detective. we have been doing research it and you guys do presentation one 2022. here is the next one 2024. i am thanking you but. when are we going to get money pay money to solve the case. i think those work on this. thank you. i bring these this is what they left me with.

>> >> that is when henldz are son would want mow to do. a busy month for the out reach team. we pavemented in the juneteenth parade and will be several events this is week. additionally, we will be conducting out reach at pride

events throughout the month. our policy division meeting with members of sfpd team. emergency vehicle operation's course team to train and learn with them about what it takes to do the vehicle pursuits and the type of driving that sfpd has to do. we learned what the department emphasizes to officers and this is part of our research for the upcoming prop e related changes. if you have not done it, i recommend going down there. i believe the chief will accommodate to you go to the trainings. this one i attendsd and it was fun. i hit a bunch of cones. i had a good time on the course. >> thank you. >> recommend. >> in closed session we have one case in front of you. and today with me is senior

investigator matt stone. who is in the audience in case have you questions about dpa, contact us on the worldwide web. at sfgov.org/dpa. that concludes my rash and welcome questions i know there are recall agenda items we may comment but reserve my comments until that time. thank you. >> thank you acting director rosenstein we need you back more often. all right. sergeants.

member who is would like to ment on 5 the director's report. approach the podium. >> there is in public comment. item 6. commission reports discussion and possible action. commission president's reports and announcements and schedule of identifies for consideration in a future meeting. >> thank you. i would like to note that commissioner benedicto and i have begun meeting with the what? team, chief? phenomenonal team. in we discuss the san francisco police department district boundaries. that is coming up for review. a phenomenonal team has been put together.

i will turn over to the chief. thank you. it is under strategic management bureau. director and callen is the lead. >> doing a lot of work. thank you. i will be brief. there is a lot to this but the police commission and the san francisco police department have reviewed the sfpd district station boundaries. for the public you are aware but this is man dateed occur every 10 years by charter. the boundary analysis provides the commission, police department and the community an opportunity to evaluate or proo vied insight what has or not and projected to change so we adjust. the evaluation considers data from 10 factors in the san

francisco code. so these are stloongding factors that we need follow this to do this evaluation. per legislation the goal to mack myself effectiveness of police operations and the use of resource. the left time this was done was 2015. review this will occur over 2024 and mid 2026. and then during the 24 year the police department will garth and analyze data. the alternative bound easier and engage the public and stake holders in conversation about this issue. and recommend boundary changes. i said by january first of 25, the chief of police will present

a recommendation to this commission and 2025 the police commission will provide a public comment period of time 90 days before deliberating. the dead line to implement change system july in 2026. will be planned by the police department and the commission. so. to ensure we have a diverse perspective, we seek participation tr all communities in san francisco. you can complete a survey. build a map and provide comment on the sfpd district station boundaries. you can attends any district station meeting month hear

project information and submit a printed comment card. additional opportunities for input will be available as maps are developed and considered and the department and the commission will make sure that this information is made available to the public as the meetings are schedule or go regarding issue are schedule. you can also e mail information on the following e mail. if you go on the website i read out there is more information on this topic. . if you see any fires in around stations that has the qr code you use your tonight and get it on your phone. thank you, commissioner e lies. >> it is on our commission

website under this meeting. correct in >> it is under the police commissioner announcements. mr. allen we have a new project for you. see. [laughter]. okay. vice president carter over stone. >> thank you. president elias. wanted to address the changing composition of the commission. first by acknowledging former commissioner burns service to the commission. commissioner burns served on the commission for several years. i think it is no secret commissioner burn and i did not agree on every issue this came before the commission. and sometimes when we did it was for different reasons. i think the public really benefitted from hearing commissioner burn's perspective. and i wanted to thank him for

his service and wish him well in post commission life. i wanted to welcome commissioner walker back and hope she enjoyed her couple of months off. and i wanted welcome retired judge clay to the commission. i think that i share the view of many others of being excited have you on the commission. someone with your record of public service. i think your experience and track record will be invaluable to our work. i wanted to welcome and you appreciate your wellingness to serve. second thing, i wanted to request to agendize an item.

i wanted request reagenda iegz the issue of the sf safe issue. i will call at this time most neutral term. at the time of our original hearing the district attorney asked us not to pose certain questions because it might somehow affect separate criminal investigation. time negligent da's letter now lapsed. when she asked we not ask certain questions i would like the issue to reagendized so we could have a hearing on the issue. i think there is a lot of questions and some discrepancy with the representations made before this commission.

that's it. >> thank you. >> commissioner walker. >> thank you very much. happy pride and i want toy emphasize imappreciative you got your rainbow shields. people notice and mention today. it works appreciate that. i want to update i have beeneen over the last couple months meetings to discuss an issue relevant to the 30 by 30 contract to increase the representation of women on our force. it is an extensive conversation about making childcare available for officers. that does not just help women but anyone serving. especially with the hours we ask officers to sign up for.

i'm working with supervisor melgar's office. from the commission on status of women. the sheriff's office. as well as staff from both departments. we are really moving forward on multiple -- areas to try in secure support from existing state and local programs to folk nus on trying to make that available. as a pilot and then long are term close to each station. it would be helpful in recruiting and keeping folks. i heard a lot that it is something as our fellow commissioners than takes a lot of time. you know -- there's less

availability of childcare in general. and then the service that was available at city hall was shut down. there is a need as we move forward. with the new plans. for what will be at the old hall of justice am thank you. >> thank you. commissioner yee. >> thank you. president elias. first i want to congratulate retired judge clay. on your appointment as our new police commissioner. welcome. hope to learn from and you work with you and you can be one of our guiding lights here in the chamber. and also want to thank

commissioner walk are for reupping on the seat. great to hear the testimonies and the response from the board and your spchlt looking forward to continue working with you. may be even like to work operation of the special police work on. that's all i have to r. >> thank you. sergeant? >> members who would like to comment on item 6. approach. thank you. i hope that there will be consideration of moving the castro part of the castro in park station. district. go back to the -- chief's

report. all of the dialogue the last year with respect to the downtown drug markets. you look at videos and photographos social media of the condition in front of library and in perhaps 3-4 blocks off of market street. >> at least from those they see and the video that i look at.

it is a distressing site. i'm dismay thered has not been more discussion a colloquy on this. as to not only what has been done but the strategy is and -- how we can improve those conditions? thank you. discussion on the initiative implementation updates for third quarter 2023. discussion.

sergeant will present and we have officer hill and the director mc guire to here for questions. also want to public low thank the team and candy and gabe and mc guire. we submitted the 272 recommendations and expect that report from the california doj in the coming months. it was a list and these are the people that -- for the last 2-3

years have been instrumental in getting us to the point we are at. we are committed to continue the work and sustain the reform. measures we put in place and the plans are the next days of the prescription but wanted to public low thank this team. president and vice president and act executive director and chief scott. thank you for having us for this update.

this start in the 2016 under the doj. at the change of the administration. they pulled out of that agreement. and so from 27 to 2018 rebuilding of the process. in 2018 we reengaged the process with the california doj. with partners now jensen hughes as the middle grounds over site. we continue in 2019. and the department achieved 40 recommendations of compliance. 40 of the 272. there is low structure nothing revamping of the philosophy how we achieve them and it worked. and the next two years we

completed 205 recommendations. our final phase, 3 plus, was the remaining 20 recommendations lingering and those have been completed. this was a first of its kinds process in san francisco the largest performing in the u.s. the establishment of the special standard's. the collaborative reform initiative. phase two the executive sponsors. increasing doj and the hughes team adaptation and change of

philosmeat-and-potatoes prop. phase 3 plus increased our completion kayedence and reorganization of the remaining recommendations. with the time lines below. there were now viewpoints from all organizations. and it wed achieve the 2 sfoochl in addition to the main partners here we have the supportive partners part of the process. individual community members, human right's commission. public defender.

bar association. center for police and equity. controller's office and poa. faith based groups and the mayor's office thises is a visual how we managed the phase 3 plus per remaining 20 recommendations. 20s were group in the 5 different plans you see the idea that shared work efforts. and or the end goal of those were similar. and self recommendations did in the have a tie and we named those as independent recommendations. >> here we have over view of specific objectives to the project plans one and 2 in the use of force and data and track. those were to integrate more of the records management system.

and increase collection of use of force and arrest in analysis. plan 3 in the commute policing forums the main goal reestablish the community forms and bring them up with best practice. >> the management dash board project plan 4. encompany us performance evaluations and resources to inform coaching and develop personnel and show data out come by demographics. >> there is a -- large aspect of internal justice throughout internal affair's process. develop review board. better tracking with internal adespairs the office of inclusion which is unit in the sfpd. here weave have the use of force

and data this is project plan one and two. more specific the objectives for the plan were to have more electronic data of use of force and arrest data. audit this coordinate with external partner in this case we use wife centers for police and equity. the goal is to collect and analyze data to identify trends and to approve all the data collection. we did that to integrate the data collection in record's management system. more robust analysis. added data point for collection. >> impact this had is able to update our train to improve use of force out come. improved data support or data quality and will a major

reduction in firearms through training. the community policing forum project plan 3, 3 recommendations. main objiktive the chief's forums. within that main goal it was to ensure community were part of this under represented community were a part of this. and to allow for the mounts to have a voice and engage in the chief and the police department with problem solving issues. this was achiefed through an application process we put out to the public and received applications and ultimately went to the chief for selection approval and selection. the meetings have occurred.

and continuing to occur. feedback in the members of the forums is collected. through preand post surveys. any all this information is by the community engage am division. the impact is we have included the diverse communities. have been engaged with the chief and the fact overnight department. as the surveys got members are having a meaningful impact on policies in the department of and this helps to inform the community engage am divisions -- for their annual ports they manage. this is our management dash board plan 4. a superior robust spearhead by

duty lieutenant the objective to incorporate the will evidences to suz had to improve performance levels. achieve third degree through developing metrics to identify data out liars. kwhiel they are supervisoring in the moment, and for the learning are trepdzs for those they command.

accountability this is project plan 5. 2 recommendations here. here, it was to identify identify, data points to understand fair and partial examine what data quarterly. achieved through the existing drb adding in the office of inclugdz an inspect over site. inclusion collaborates with internal affairs to identify the metrics and rarn lives and review them. this project plan part of out put was to generate a quarter low passport for discipline out come and identify and avoid the potential bias on an internal

procedural type of philosophy. doing this plan is giving internal affairs more resources. internal preerm justice was emphasized. and it is made our investigations efficient and compliant with existing laws. it gives am more faith. of for the of officers and personnel different processes fair and accurate. 7 recommendations that were not tieed a plan. very briefly 55-2 was about collecting data regarding complaints about the members when the out come and were this

goal it increase transparency and other process. and to include employee demographics on how develop was applied. >> 39.1 and 40.2 community police to emphasize the original strategy the chief came up with regarding strategy 1.0. to increase collaboration. and to develop multiple plans. the left one there on this page was to incorporate and to -- incorporate and include committees to develop community policing practice this is included peer to peer captain level sharing of information. more communityys policing we updated our man dwlaul has a

measure input from the department of police accountability. and members from the departments and this was significant manual revised and being used. >> use of force was trying to understand the use or the reasons for the use of deadly force amongst the police department. what we do is increased transparency through our existing 96a or the report as we call it. >> we have been able to increase the level of our use of force training. and we changed the higher threshold to draw firearms. the last recommendation is 68.1. which was to improve our

technological capacity. in an easy format. and 99% of the department reporting is now this used to take weeks and now is automateed make regular reports. >> this slide the two exciting columns there are 2 sfoot last in progress where it says it is zero. there are none in progress. there are 3 in

externalvilleidation in final stage of approval with the california department of justice. there are 24 with per ins jensen hughes. we stand at 245. once the 24 and the 3 are through the process, we will have completed and re[inaudible] 272 recommendations. the last 8 slides of this presentation are an adundzp dendzum and highlight from thes work that continue to demonstrate the objectives and reform work.

how this will happen in terms of use of force? how are you going to remain compliant. >> well is a sustainability component that officer hiller can speak to. there are discussions regarding

the sustainability components of all recommendations that have a sustainability component. i don't think all of the answers have been quite parsed out. how is the department -- my question is -- i gus answered the department does not have a plan on how to deal with the way it will monitor prop e now? with use of force. we have written some of it in the policy. other thing that since it is you say that is in progress, right? may be that should in the be

zero there should be numbers in this column. i loved the slide and love your optimism. i think well is still some stuff we have to do in terms of getting prop e compliant. gabe left and the writing for the two projects plans is left with him. [laughter] so, and thank you for being here. so, the ways which we're ensure the data quality for use of force and for most data sets on a quarterly base we do a data validation. our analysts and the team confirm and check the data against our incident data. and they if there is discrepancy

than i go in and look at the line of data or the incident report and ensure that one or the other is correct. usually a minor correction. to use of force or more upon afternoon you know it would be something they ask if the writer or the use of force report. more often it is i situation where an officer has released the individual and not arrested them. after a use of force was conduct. yea. >> i want to break down you are using differents terms people are not familiar with. >> yea. >> my understanding is you say the analysts will review report to the data. when you say incident you mean the report the officer take when is he uses use of force?

less when i refer to the police department. so when an officer makes an arrest, they and other cases they complete an incident report. a police department. and provides a lot of information the use of force evaluation form. is embedded with the system this collects the report. collect use of force and come up where the use of force then that form is available and enter this information. so. this is part televisionment when they are check for example completeness and in most case there is is a use of force there has been an realist. and so that is a good check to ensure that our data is complete. that's when they had anyone doing and now embed in the the system.

such this it is almost uniformly well is a one to one match. >> the analyst has that information in terms of the writing. available. >> they have >> the data set. >> how is it going to happen when now for use of force if there is no long are going to be in circumstances a written report but a body worn camera. that would take the analyst long torme review the cam are to check for compliance versus they have to review incident report? >> this is part of our implementation efforts and i have been talk with how we doll that. well is likely going to have to be a technological solution. >> the department does not have that technology. jury room not ready. correct. >> when will this solution be

available? do you snng >> i am i than we -- there is a budget that has to be passed first s. it in the budget? if we don't have a solution when it start what is is the remedy? what will we do. >> defer to the chief. sorry. >> it is in the budget. i want to up step. analysis we'll do the use of force tracking form is where most of that information come from. >> nought supervisors instead of reading reports review cameras of the officers. if use of forts they do the tracking form and yes. right. yea. they get it and says use of force as a supervisor they go back and review what the officer wrote or the base for use of force how to articulate it.

and figure out whether or not it complies with the use of force policy. right? that is correct. >> when they do this, now instead of a report the supervisor reads the supervisor now will have to review camera, right? >> in some case. prop e reads is calls for efficiencies on multiple reporting. so if there are 20 officers on the seen, two use force. it calls for not of the -- witness the witness officers or officer that made everybodying involveded to document what they saw in the camera. the supervisor has to review

camera >> they always required. that does not change what changes how the officers whether the officers have to write a statement. so if there are 20 officers honestly -- the supervisors first will look at the officers in the use of force. they do this before the end of their shift am 20 rate of speed they will not do that. so that does not change what changes is how many people officers now will be required to write a statement or incident report. which we have been work through this. the tracking and supervisor track form nothing changes except for prop e calls for special now -- a bit different.

what about the technology piece >> a couple thing this is we ask requested in the budget is everyone transcription or like to get to a transcription technology. so it make its easy to take what is on the camera and transcribe it. there are software connections. aural this has to link up. and now we are short with some

of when we need to link up to different systems to integrate like body worn camera and other systems. that's in the budget. i think there are several million dollars of enhancements for technology to shore up some things. i don't know it all off the top. we need at this time problem is it is in the budget but you know what happens it gets cut. we need to see what in the budget is needed for implement prop sxeshg what will get cut. currently, the trend is to put everything on cam are, the department does not have a system to easily extract and distribute camera upon request. to requesting agencies. i know we talked about the reduction sovt ware. i think it is important to

see -- what technology is needed to make this happen. and ai software. you ton get to the information we need to quicker rather than cyst through hours of cameras. those are all advancements we have to get to which the use of force track to analyze trends and all that. that does not change that information will be reported. >> vice president carter. >> thank you. president and thank you sergeant for the presentation. i think the president asked a great question use of force and prop e and obligations. to fulfill the recommendations. i will -- feel like the

discussion was sufficient. il ask one other thing which is -- the -- body worn camera policy that will need to be amended in order to conform because now we -- supervisor could not just review body camera footage in the ordinary course. where for example, now under prospect e something that was reportable is no longer. . supervisor needs to consult the body camera footage. i think in many circumstances the policy would not prevent that. ; is that correct? >> possibly. threshold what is reportable it changed what prop e is.

there are differenceos what is reportable that is beyond. question i'm asking is now because there is no long are going to be a written report in light of prop e it does not hit anybody. under the confidentiality policy that would be reportable. under prop e not if it missed everything. notice -- i don't know. >> that's correct. >> prop e have to have caused injury. so. i am asking to cut to the chase we have to amend the body camera policy? correct? >> i want to make sure we are giving the publicarcerate information if we fired a shot and missed them. that is still a reportable use of force.

>> less than lethal. >> if we fire a bean bag we don't walk washing way and say, we missed. there is a written report under prop e as you read it. if we use that force, yes, for if you fiforced somebody hands behind their back there was no injury. that is no long are reportable unless there is an injury. the higher level erw's. firing a weapon. those are reportable. >> i guess may be brackett this. i read prop e that would not be reportable and may be discuss what off line. i understand when you pull out your service weapon it is reportable regardless. stereotype 3's this don't result in injury would not be

reportable we will move on. and circle back on that >> chemical agents are reportable. >> that don't injury. >> when i use chemical agent its is report. we call for medical attention. >> okay. whether or not they say they are injured that is reportable. >> fair enough. >> question -- so. ghan there is the outstanding 27 recommendations what other mou with doj lapse has that happened. >> it has. they are in the evaluation stage.

>> sometimes more than dozens. that was a statement.

do you agree? i do. and i think this is the benefit of collaborative reform. ultimately is that if those recommendations and the ways they are not prit of in the way we impelement them we can work in this case jansen hughes. to layout something that would work and they determine whether or not they feel is compliant. and furthermore the compliance measures with cal doj helped articulate what would get you to substantial compliance. everyone knows that we had to hit those mile stones in order to be there. >> because anyone of the recommendations could be satisfied in myriad of ways is it accurate to say no guarantee

being in compliance is not we adopted best practice or we adopted the optimal policy. it is compliance means have you as we discussed adopted the dozens of paths that satisfy the guidance that doj provided. i think all of our responses to recommendations are included on your website and the public can decide that on their own. we spell out how we felt to apply and the doj assessment of each the 245 are up there now. once we receive word whether or not we are compliant official low, they will provide us documentation saying and post that on the wines. i think that is up to the public as to when they think is

compliant and we are happy to hear from them as well through the many forums we out line in the our communities recommendations. okay. i take that confirm you do glay compliance is not the same adopted the evidence based best practice or one of the top two or three best practice? >> or all of them. >> before -- director mc guire that's a yes? to the question. >> i think that the question for doj.

yes, they do review and make recommendations and give us feedback whether we neat are standards of good practice and best practice. i will not say that is for every dgo. sounds like we have adopted the best practice but not for all of them that is not the standards

for compliance. reason i wanted raise this is i have heard people say. i want to acknowledge the fact that we -- are you know upon on the yard line of commroeth the recommendations is unmitigated good. department's work should be lotted. but i have heard folks say things like the fact we complete third degree means sfpd is a leader in reform. this is not true as a result of this. i think we need to remember the reason dj came in there was a broach of public trust. there was racist texts. you know shootings of unarmed citizens. these recommendations were designed to bring us up to baseline. butt fact we completed i was --

would comment on that. with all respect, commissioner i had personal conversations with law enforcement in the united states. colorado, san diego, new york, boston, l.a. florida. to i think under mines the work in progress when we sfeek in this context. if we do this we can be critical we are welcome. we have been that's why we engaged in this. >> the members of the department was difficult in the beginning. it is a cultural thing it is adopt today is okay. reform is okay. we are on the right path and the

yea, but approach let's have that discussion. but not today. >> yea but is not going to help us move forward to get to where we want to g. we said it the chief said it. police reform is never finished. we are not done we have people say sfpd you other best does not mean well is not higher to go. yes, we will have that discussion. yes we will continue. and and yea. >> i appreciate that feedback and the w done here was lotable i think this is the proper forum to contextualize what this means the department had a celebration with member of the political branch to do what you were talking about.

to cell brit this mile stone. i think this forum that's not the principle goal of the work we do here. i want top ask, are we in compliance with all of the recommendations related policy make? are those among the 27 still? those the development q. 301 are in compliance. >> okay. i will ask about a couple of the specific policy making recommendations. i think that this will put in what i'm talking about. when i talk about the gap between what it means to be compliant and to be adopting a best practice. >> sorry. can i add to gabe's response.

so with the policy making portion there is then recommendations related to policy development. the i think one of the things that dojmented to see wases that there was a constant upon effort being made to make the changes, update the policies and keep moving. this was untouchd and needed to change. you the folks that w on these so much recognize that that has changed in the department. that is the foundation for the compliance for those recommendations.

great. to take one i will do a couple. i will read recommendation 70.1 and 71.1. am sfpd work with the police commission for press for reviewing existing and new dgo that support policing with policies. related recommendation 71.1 sfpd work with the police dmoigz create a process to make timely and necessary updates to key policy. so. i presume our adoption is when drove the finding of compliance. as we discussed a meeting ago, under the current system. the department adopted and declined comupon ply by doopth what i character a rad exam

interpretation that now says the department has unlimited time to complete the policy making process. let me jump inform we near compliance with the recommendation. >> yes. some of this work is reform i don't care the department or the reform project is. reform does in the drive absolute protection is driveers system a mind set and attitude a spirit. and policies where we can make adjustments when we run in future problems. part of how we get to having to do reform because we have not made adjustments the issues you brought up with -- policies languishing.

we have already -- got on the road to address that we don't to go 15-20 years before we make a policy adjustment. that is what this is and to the sergeants's point and mc guire's point, really want to emphasize that compliance did not equal perfection. am what it equal system putting policy in place to address issues as they arise.

>> that's what reform is. i think we agree that substantial compliance does not equal perfection. i don't think the issue i raise side [inaudible] it is affecting several dgo's called out out by the department of justice and we are experiencing the same issues. i think it legitimate to raise that there are my clothes in the queue. i will ask about another finding. which was -- finding 77.

on page 170 sfpd does not conduct audits where practice are established in policy. this one stood out because it was not long ago that director mc guire was here answering questions about why sfpd was not following its own department notice to audit quarterly. we all read newspaper accounts of a newspaper that analyzed our staff data and found what it was discrepancies that could point to falseification of the data. sfpd was not doing those audits at all. again, we near compliance butt facts on the grounds are at the least not a best practice we

were not following our directive to odd they data. is this fair? what's the question are we in compliance. i know we are in compliance director mc guire answerd that. you would agree that we are still not auditing data we are directed to by our policy despite in compliance? that it is an accurate and true statement. we did not audit this information. we everauditings things we never audited before part of the work. and again, commissioner, when these come up, the question is

are we willing to adopt or correct course. dom we have the system in place to figure out ways to correct course when they come up. this is the commission and the accountability body. you north shy did pointing out the faults. if we just say, okay. the reform is about correcting the issues. putting system in place. will i will be frank with you. yes, there will be issues we don't have enough people to do all the audits.

is picked out a couple from a 5 page span. we could do this for every section and the goal here is i think we need to be honest with the public d about what completion means and does not mean >> there was a big celebration for completion of the report i think that was warrantied but i think we need provide accurate information about the consequence of this money and is think the two examples we discussed show that compliance is differents than evidence based best practice. >> director. >> good news stop data audited

by the police accountability. we should have a report shortly. hopefully that takes the air out of that. >> award wing auditing. >> thank you. >> and we have been w with. don't try to take credit for that j. no. >> no. >> yes. i saw him working today. i have 3 questions and comments if you will all indulge me and chief. i am excited hear about oei with internal affairs analysis to identify capture data. and generate quarter low report busy discipline out come. of chief, you and i meated meet and conifer about discipline. one of the biggest issues we have is how to make discipline out come fair and equal.

across the board. and my commented be that this report would be helpful to the department of police. one of the things we strug welis the discipline matrix we have has a wide variety of discipline for a lot of the violations. and struggled determine when would be appropriated for the each circumstance and i believe if i'm reading correct, this dataald be helpful to us so we can all get on the same page what discipline is appropriate. i than there will be quarter low the review board and will be there. i wonder if we can get the quarter low reports regular low so we can try to balance out

some of the discrepancies we see when trying to recommend discipline. no problem >> thank you. >> i have two more questions. i heard you say that there were going to be the use of force reports are not going. i wonder do you envision situations where than i may not be a report but a use of force report. sometimes we have situations we are evaluating force and we have both.

>> we seat software connect >> transcription of body western camera >> we do have transcription it is the in budget. when it is said and done. >> appearing when? >> friday. >> next week. we will agendaize that for next week. >> we have one more or more. >> another month. >> thank you. >> that's it. >> yep. >> thank you >> commissioner clay. >> chief, you are late to the game. mine is narrow and madam pit think she aided me i gotta catch up to stuff people had. my question is for me as i go forward. i get prop e and the issue of

the use of force my question is when i'm hearing here if there is a use of force in thes upon category one be in a report and documented and another may not be written report you will have your pdr cam are there available to make an inquire tow look atting something someone may make a complaint. never undocumented the question is how? >> correct. >> we will have access to see that. >> correct. >> frank low the body cameras from my point. view when i have a hearing you will finds that is the best evidence can you get you see t. and reports are sometimes written out not limp and there is a training on reports i like the idea you will always have that evidence available. >> that's correct. >> that's all i want. later on.

this is i'm learning thank you. keep will bridge the gam disseminate that. that is the birth issue how do we get, now staffing wise and technology the department does not have the capability of providing body camera requests to requestors in a timely fashion. dpa had this issue when they had the disciplinary cases. that's the prong of how do we we will turn it over to body camera. the other problem is if we don't have the staff or technology to disseminate it when necessary that is how we run in a stekdz problem. >> well is in the a process the end of the shift the officers don't log in cameras in the

fileded in document that day and time. have you that have snob retrieve it. look and review and see if they distribute it. there is a lot that goes into. upon we think, watching the camera is easy there is a lot they do to get it ready. that's the problem. the department does not have a system in place to do that section of it. >> there is an editting of the redaction. to redact. >> that's the public not larceny. they are not allowed. >> all right. >> all right.

>> commissioner. >> thank you. president elias. i think as we are you know informing the public of beg your pardon how we goat conclude and generate report its is helpful to get what we are measuring and how we are. in the both commune policing and advisory forum section. you know in the impact there is a statement saying you know we have establish and include diverse membership. and being -- the commissioner over seeing the community policing dgo i like it get a sense how this was measureed get to this statement. >> i'm sorry. you are referring to the project 3? >> page 8.

>> and the impact of the 3 recommendations for community policing and forums. it says we have a diverse membership. how did we measure that? the community the chief's community forum. and the process by which we review applications and considered them. and we had a broad cross section of san francisco on that committee. i don't know if the chief wants to peek to that more. >> yes. we used to have 13 different chief's forums. what we did to have a more stream lined process is one forum invitations to those of the representatives from all

overnight forums. and now we have one chief's forum that brings everybody together. with this there is better tracking. communication with the group and because the thing we fell short on prior to our work and during the work until we came up with format was we had 13 forums and track was lacking. the -- yes.

so. what we have done in the last probably 3-4 months. this is the per of the work. every entity has to have a community mreegs plan we have the plans into probably a 3 inch binder. the plans are are bust. not every plan is the same. every district has a plan. that has been done. they have been checked -- approved by chain of commands. so that has been done and it is better then and there what you saw the left time. i'm sure. >> i hope. >> yea. i'm sure. because i think at the last time we were not complete. we started this project when

covid struck and put a damper on the ability to finish. we have finished it. and it is a very robust set of plans that every entity has the plans that's our guide line that is sprit from the chief. the stations and when they do are in writing >> great. in your -- where are we as far as we checked all the box. made a lot of progress and huge lift. years of dig deep and doubling down on making sure we prioritize policy and we

prioritize transparency. so we i have reduction in minority impacts as far as adverse impacts use of force or stops and churches and based on the third quarter report left year, the disprosecute portionate contacts are there. what point in this process do we gain that traction. what point does this policy and to comment made earlier does this impact the culture of the department to then reduce the numbers from 12.4, you know in use of force, 10.6. you know -- in searches. you know in the african-american

community. when do they come down. because 8 years down the road we are not far away from the same numbers. with the pilot will answer there were components to that question. you know of course we'll see how the dgo9 place a part and violence reduction strategies play a part. you know our crime the data shoes most of our gun violence and stuff are black and brown men. right? if we focus on those people

committing gun violence. focus will be on the people that are committing gun violence. now they include the gammet of out roach and service prosecute void and we are degree warrants and arresting people for committing gun violence. but our thoughts have decreased significant low. and we are still seeing tremendous reduction in gun violence where this project strategies near place.

i expect we will. and i than there has been progress. i am a believer in the more we engage our communities the more the communities feel they have access to the leader and this

department. the safer san francisco will come there will be the trust factor a gentlemen said, there is not a trust factor. there are upon communities. i brought update language access issues. there are communes who don't believe they can communicate. they don't even from the access or available of the access. so i know we have work to do and made a lot of progress and that's why we are here committed to spending our evenings and days working on these issues and. we don't want to i don't want to come off as you know, a kinds of throwing water on this or dampning the mood but there is work to be done still and we can celebrate the accomplishments but i agree that they are still a big are lift to be able to

impact on the number this is brought us here. thank you. joy want to go to the discussion. use. force reporting the department's interpretation. made sure that i'm accurate the department's interpretation is all use of forevers other than type one already not reportable. were reportable. so type 3 use force still reportable. and so this prospect e the changes are meant to cut down on reporting. twhons gets through and if and when it is passed by the

commission is cut down on no, ma'am touch a key board to report. iot incident will be documented tell be documented on the incident report. do we need 20 people writing statement when is 2 or 3. that is the way we intercept this. i will be brief am thank you very much. there were 3% of the of graduateds or -- flount in other

languages. and noticing that there was also woman on there and another 3 that was added. what is your goal or where issue we on the 30/30? if you have information? and wanted see where we are on there. >> 15% women. we have to double to get to 30% by 30/30. current, cad me started with 40 and leave with 25% were women. we are chipping away.

we want to. this department opportunity for everybody. there are issues we want to work on to make sure we are that department. where everybody is. opportunity to dot thing they need to do to advance sxreers promote and work the units competitive to get in them and the trinning and things they need. there is a lot that guess into this not just about recruitment. we want the women to tell others, this is the department you want to work for. that's when this committee work is doing. the community is help top have recruiting being diverse and reflective of the community. we thank you very much for the recruitment class. thank you, chief. members withhold like to comment regarding item 7 prop the

podium. well is no public upon comment. >> item 8 discussion on 2024dg working group for 2024 require community feedback discussion and possible action.

>> all right. >> hello, everyone. i'm the community policy working group cord coordinator for the police department. first i want to start with saying this it is nice meeting you all in person. i know i only seen commissioner max in person before. so temperature is good to procure faces behind names. i want to say the month.

june. happy pride monthfuly.sed to -- express my grad evergratitude for the rainbow patch. because you know as a part of lbgtq+ community and somebody takening political asylum near being a part of the lbgtq+ community working for this dhpt has the gestures of you know showing the diversity and the value have you it encourages a person like me to be working near departmentful thank you very much. what i will do today i'm here to provide presentation on our proposal for the community policy working group. i want toed list the objectives of the presentation today. number one i will present the

[inaudible] that is approved by the chief. and next a lives dgo we propose to working group list for this year. after i will go over the ration behind the sxroefl closing thought and i will pass it over to dpa for the presentation before we take questions you may have. >> okay. section 301 or 3a. the review list that is approved for 2024. by the chief of police. there are 15dgo's on the list we update the calendar year.

both are in presentation ask the commission deflect two of the few we are presenting the case for. i will explain the reasoning behind the selection as a type and the number. to understand the reason behind the number of dgo's we are proposing to require work group for the year is important we number one electric at the working group that wecum.

based on that, we will see the projected implementation time line based on the medium time and the fax max time to complete the group.

the year deadly weapon 4 community work grouches for dgo on the table on the slide. you see i listed the start and end dey date and the time it took to complete. and -- i'm not going down the list but you see they have a working group. different from the number of day its took to complete other dgo's. i want to acknowledge the 701 was an out liar it was because the time line was impacted by covid and had to work around juveniles who were a part of the

working grouch that is why i have not dealt with the average i dealt with the median time what is the time it would take for our future working group it is to be completed. >> over here you see, the 520, if we take that example the working group was set on may 16, 24. we are passed. based on that like00 auto76 business days. the completion date would be november 5 of 2024 f. we take into consideration the 120 business days. it would take for us to complete

that by -- i think -- 8 of 24. 76 business days is 3 and a half months and 120 business days, 5 and a half months. and also keep in mind that once we completed a working group there are next steps to be completed in policy for public posting and approval from the commission as limp and all of that takes time. >> moving forward, i just also want to list here the

responsibilities and run a community working group. involves out reach i have been doing since joining the department to nonprofits or community members. to be a part of the working group we plan to have and means that i will manage the membership in creating an approval. approved. and reaching out to the members leading me to making logistics the time, location and the materials this go in a working grouch the working group i have been ukts can. majority of my time gets spends on the krid and the department. we want to make sure we are doing our research of best

practice and we are -- appropriate low responding to recommendations we have been collecting during the working group this is like includes my next is research and analysis. it takes to dot working group. those previous two slides account for why we are rmdzing 3 or now two working groups. the first is the 520ful language access service for limited english importance. number one venn it did form a community work group. and number two, it has a direct

impact on the community. because we want to make sure as a department we ensure effectiveness of the communication that we have with sfpd members and the limited english profortunate persons we have. and make sure we look for ways to improve engagement with communities. having a working group come in handy to get all of those recommendations that we need. the next per we want to review options as a resource to officers and limited english. the stuff we will have be a soushsz for tousz review that. and want to enengage all our key stake holders and also the community members to address a policy on gaps that may be

happening. and a need for new training that was my residential for this year 520.

>> the citizen complaintses that we may have received on this. next one that you want we have is for the community policy working group. the number one thing is it is start friday the community working group. it makes sense. and it also has like 520 an impact on the community. and because it really tells you how the department engage and collaborate with the communities within san francisco. to identify challenges while adhering to the procedural justice. this is a great opportunity on the effectiveness of the current community strategies we do have. and any performance measures that we may want to check that -- to see how effective the performance measures are.

and other performance measures it also would help us to aline our policy with thes emerging policy practices and address new local community needs as well. so, i also want to touch a bit not list each. but give you just a major reasoning behind why some of the dgo's would not require a community working group. it could be because of the no impact the dgo administrative function does not require a lot of feed become from the community. number two, the fact the dgo is like federal, state or local law and there is not aloft leeway in that. testimony is procedural.

. so a feedback excels may not change things the law drives what the dgo is. and the third one would be an example of that and buzz of the time sdrients we have to first acknowledge this workers have spoken because of prop e and the time it is not possible for you to have a working group and complete everything from this dgo. >> with that, just a baptist closing remarks. again i want to reminds you about the high level considerations that we dmept minds when we were thinking about the number and the type this we are recommending for proposal the number one administrative that it takes for us to run our working groupful

we are proposing originally planning propose 3 but i would really appreciate if we can have like you know, choose any 2 of the 3's less than 6 months. with this said,il pass it on to dba and i will take questions you may have.

>> closing remarks. i did speak with jeffernan i don't knows we did discuss the working group proposals. we are looking forward to engaging. in the work grouchls wee cop customer with the recommendation if we will have to narrow it down to two it should be the element and sexual assault. lep on the forefront of the mind -- and because we are had several cases that have high luted for us the experience of the sexual assault. our recommendation would be if we pick two of the throw that will be lastly community policing is an aren't dgo that has a lot of governed complng need to concentrate on the other two that for revamping purpose

and buzz resources are scare scarce. i think that's it. yes it went on for two years. it was grit and set the borrow for when working groups should be. are your picks as well. i think by my image that is i

didn't want to give this decision for to you make. a great nonanswer. welcome, this is your first time before the commission. i don't think i have met you. so i think you did a great job in presenting. what you need is to agree as a commission on the two working groups to move forward i propose that we move the lep and sexual assault working group forward? that good? >> anyone objects speak now or

forever holds your piece >> let's vote. >> public comment. thank you commissioner yee. look at you. >> members like to comment on item 8 approach the podium. >> thank you. >> hope to see you back soonful there is no public comment. commissioner walker? >> yes. >> sorry. commissioner clay? >> yes. commissioner walker. >> yes. >> commissionerian yessir. >> yet >> and president elias >> yes. >> du want to speak? sorry?

take it off >> public comment on matters pertaining to closed session. there is no public comment >> 10 a vote whether to have felony closed session the code section 57.10 d action >> a motion. >> move to go to closed session. >> second. >> on the motion commissioner clay. >> yes >> commissioner waker yes. >> commissionerian yessir. >> yes >> and president e lies.

>> we issue back in open session on item 12. vote to disclose discussion on item 11 in closed session. san francisco code section pen.12a action. >> a motion? >> motion. >> not to disclose. >> second. >> any member like to comment regarding item 12. >> yes. >> commissioner >> yes >> commissioner yo >> yes. >> vice president carter. >> yes >> president elias. >> yes. >> item 13. adjournment. adjourned. clear clear complaints and

not (indiscernible) that concludes today's overview. thank you for your time. >> what happens after a complaint is submitted? when dpa receives a complaint, the first step is it to assign it to a investigator. if the complainant provides contact information, they receive a letter telling them knoo they assigned investigator will be. if the complaint is submitted anonymously they will not receive further contact from dp. >> what happens when dpa finds a police miscucktd? >> the dpa find misconduct, meaning sustain a complaint, the next step is to determine how serious the

misconduct is and what discipline the dpa will request (indiscernible) the dpa does not itself impose discipline and can only recommend discipline in a sustained case. >> what happens if a complaint turninize to a chief nonnob >> if the dpa decides to recommend 10 days suspension or less, the chief of police is the final determner of both whether misconduct occurred, and if the chief agrees misconduct occurred, what the disciplineitary penalty will be. in those cases if the chief disagreewise dpa, the case is over and dpa does not have any recourse. if the chief decides that misconduct occurred, and to impose discipline, an officer has a right to a hearing

before that decision is final. >> what happens if a dpa complaint turns into a commission level case? >> if the dpa determines a 11 day suspension all the way up to termination is the appropriate outcome for a misconduct case, a trial is held in front of the police commission. normally, one commissioner presides over the trial, then the entire commission will read the transcript and vote. if the commission determines misconduct occurs, then the commission also determines what the penalty will be. if you are stopped by a police officer you should follow the officer direction, keep calm, keep still, and do not make sudden movements do not reach for anything, especially in your pockets, keep your hands visible at all times. you have the right to remain

silent. this means you do not have to say anything. tell the officer i want to remain silnts. you have a right to a attorney. tell the officer i would like a attorney. if you are arrested do not talk about your case or immigration status to anyone other then your attorney. do not sign anything without your attorney. do not lie to law enforcement officers and if you are property are being searched make sure i do not consent to the search. do not challenge the officer, you can file a complaint about police services later, if you are not comfortable speaking english you can ask for a bilingual officer who speaks your language and also ask for a interprerererererererere

>> good evening the san francisco commission on environment monday, june 24. time is 5:04 p.m. >> note that the ringing and use of cell phones and device system prohibited. advise the chair may order removal of anyone using a device. public comment be available for each item on the agenda. for comments on matters not on the agenda there will be an opportunity for general public comment. participate who is wish to comment will be asked to come forward and speak in the mic. each be allowed 3 minutes to speak. members of the public may