.903 a.m. secretary fuller, the roll. >> good morning. please respond with, here, or present. warren post. chair post is present. gerald turner is present. paul woolford fady zoubi, present. ce chair zoubi is present. with three members present we ve quorum. public comment is informational and action items. to comment in person against the wall, near the screen, the audience left.ers of the public wishing to comment on an item outside so by joining webinar through the link shown on page today's agenda and to be

recognized please select the raise in the webinar. you may mment from outside the chamber by dialing 415-655-0001 and use meeting id, to raise your hand to speak press star 3. the telephone log in information is also available on pages 1 an$m of today's agenda. commenteto three minutes per item and you will receive a when your speaking time is about to expire. many commenters on an item, the chair may reduce the less then three minutes per person. unless you are general public comment, please note you must limit your commentsthe ssed. if commenters do not stay on topic the chair may to limit comments to the item at hand. we asa civil respectful manner and refrain from abusive or hate speech will not

be tolerated.rect your remarks to commission as a whole not individual commissioners or staff.come to submit in writing to n@sfdpw.org or by mail to 49 south van ness avenue, suite 1600, san francisco california 94103.commission, we extend thanks to sftv building management and media service staff helping make is ft possible. chair post. >> thank you. before calling the next item, i like to amend today's agenda. i like to change two consent calendar. staff requested itemthe sidewalk in regular meeting september 9. further, i like to move item 4h, the team for new--excuse me. not 4h. pardon me. berg san

francisco general department relocation the regular calendar right after the er item about zuckerberg on calendar item 6. i like to suthe regular item and afterwards take up 4n. have any questions or objections to great. thank you very much. alrighty.will move to my announcements as well as yourp5 secretary fuller's. i have two announcements. first, i live in the east cut neighborhood south of between embarcadero and second street. i received a news letter aprizing of street project ndiscernible] combine would road paving and pedestrian and fetym provements. this commission briefed on this major capital project and approved the contract for it. i like to xo public information officer for

excellent news esses non profits and other property owners and occupants important project over the next two plus years. there will many inconveniences and hassles but pleased to this thorough description of the project, ul information what i should expect in the months to come and who to contact with director short, was this news letter dated june 25 notification public works sends to effected properties in vicinity of infrastructure projects or was carly short. director. thank you for the question, glad you were pleased with the news letter. that is typical for the outreach pe capital projects and to the schedule or scope we definitely try to follow up bui would describe that as typical, yes. >> great. thank you. and thank you again to n] communication department and--my otto call out june nees letter in

a interesting document. it sta annual sand removal at director short. featured video footage the machinery and work required in the short dow of time.universal operating engineer shifted the sand away f great highway to be added back to showed the public works department in june color float department staff built along with massive cleaning crew that cleaned up atparade late into the night. the news letter featured the launch of computer game for children to teach and give appreciation for diverse works ofmaintain public spaces. the scape improvement project the public works commission wreefd upgrading access to the lush and beautiful knhunty creat public amenity featureed. also featured public works le] to restore and paint 32 this important boulevard and making more welcoming and

june love our c work was profiled in district 11. do my colleagues have qst secretary fuller do uhave annoñkun >> i have one brief announcement and that is my report on sanit streets commission, who they held their most recently 15 and that meeting including a repor the bureau urban forestry measures for the fiscal year as well as a update about racial equity action plan and that commission will be is scheduled for september 16 and will from the bureau building and on their performance measure and that is my only announcement this morning. if no further announcements, please open public comment on is item. >> members of the public wish to comment on item 1, announcement chair, commissioners and secretary may line up against the wall if you're commenting from outside the

chamber, press the raise your the webinar, or star 3 on your phone to be recognized. do have one member of the public who has co on this you have something that you need to project? sfgovtv, if we can have the projector shown.can introduce yourself and organizational you have three minutes to speak and i'll provide a 30 second n>> hello commissioners, director.ç6 you mentioned something i think ere. my name is adam, do advocacy for l device, things that effect can crutches, walkers, wheelchairs, str you mentioned large infrastructure project so that earlier this month [indiscernible] dolores street. unsanctioned event no permit i will speak this more during public comment.notable the city fortunate

to shut down dolores street and gave no no© the entire street was blocked 21 to 18 then 400 barricades provided by dpw. ke. they are blocking thwalk. you can see it again-this is southbound. this is copy of the letter that was seincluded dpw notifying everybody of the order of very order barricades. there is a screen shot of invoice, 401 barricades totaling $6 thousand. very expensive instillation. can't count the number of police officers here. setting them up and gu and breaking them down. with a cane trying to navigaic walking down from 20th street all the way down they have to go ound the barricades in order to get access to public right of way. so, i'm nosure any communication justified the blockage make people

reasonably safe, fwut it is important to note there wto the public and this infrastructure project no the city at least a hundred thousand dollars. thank you. >> thank you for your comments. the only in-person commenter and we do nowho called in so that concludes comment. >> thank you. please call the >> item 2 the director's report and communication. ic works director carla short is here to present and this is a informational item. >> good morning commissioners. carla short, director. we have a full agenda today, but i have to bring to your attention.recap of pride. also responding to sunday june 30 concluded a month th the internationally famous san pride parade. i believe public works is very much the backbone this incredible event. staff for many bureaus and

divisions d e downtown and civic center areas before, during and that the public right of way is clean, safe and thousands of participants and viewers.the parade, the crews are filling potholes and team in contact with contractors to insure ites in the area are clean and the public right of way is safe.use and mapping inspector walk the whole parade eas to insure there are no obinstructions debris.hour by hour plan and e event itself. we also participate in city de planning meetings to insure the event goes smoothly. allows us to be in close ce, fire and emergency management departments. c and eoc are staffed with public works employees and coordination throughout the event and emergency response systems. as the last float headed dostreet, our well corio hestreet

cleaning team began their work. by the enof the day, it of thes maive event. the downtown area was particularly exciting as the parade ended with what welargest ever public rkk>s float. many thanks to great lgbt committee for spearheading the float and in-house programming. as you may know, over the course of the last 15 years, score went from 63 to 76.considered good and san francisco rate sg large bay area cities and exceed the idered fair. the high score is resul concirted effort and dedicated funding. fiscal 23, 24 we resurfaced exceeding our goal of 500. on the website there is information about the pavement preservation where the public can access timing and location of by block. i wanted highlight a little good news in terms of the budget. we successfully advocated for

some staffing for our street use and mapping street inspectors, and we gaineeight positions to support that enforcement work.positions are critical to our additional hours and allowing our ene evenening and weekend work and taking some of the pressure ofour existing team. we will be able five street inspector street inspector positions and one this is a great addition to our illegal if you haven't seen it yet, our annual report year 22, 23 is out and it is beautiful in print and online. the report spotlights the core subs and out work from the response of dedicated and determined during the historic winter storms to new health centers we designed and p thanks for the communication git together so beautifully t. is a beautiful document. we a successful

neighborhood beautiful kay day saturday cleaning anthe marina, pacific heights, cal thanks to our staff and super post, we r website called, neat street. hare a little more about it. it spearheaded by communication team and i feel like we have one of the on teams in the city. i think moving traditional government communications. this video game is re capture the spirit maintaining cleaning sid waeeks, so it is on our website and really units civic pride with arcade the value caring for our hile having fun. with that-one other update. ch follow up update to the i wanted to just give you ate. all submitted transit shelter applications have reviewed by our bureau of street use and mapping team.e seven that are

hold but those holds were placed by mta or clear not public works. status so need updated plans orwas clarification requested. there are 10 permits for site planning and scheduled for wednesday so that essentially means we don't have anything a back-log currently, and there is no overlocations and the as of right now, there were three that had been on hold pending outreach . of the three mta is performing outreach for two one is withdrawn, so i wanted to close on that request.y to take any questions. >> thank you very much director short to me on the had members of the public here who had some good i have no other questions or comments. mment for director short on her report? commissioner zoubi. >> good morning.

thank you director short for the report and i really wanted how-what is the work of public this huge parade that millions of people sh i want the public to know how public works and what their position is during congratulations on the score, keeping that i would like to ask, what is our goal fo what are we going for? >> well our goal is to maintain a score of 75 and we currently exceeded our goal is to maintain a score of 76, we dont want to trying to maintain. >> thank you for i would like to make a request--future time to discuss the impact of the supreme court decision handle encampments and so forth. thank you. >> thfuller, before we open to public comment, if you can please for r meeting attach a etmooing to the fiscal year

22-23 annual report. nehave another outlet to we will look forward on the supreme court commission as commissioner zoubi requested. please ent. >> members of the public who wish to make three minutes of comment in person on item 2, the director's report line up against the wall furthest from from the door. if you are commenting from outside chamber, press the raise your hand button or star 3 on your phone it appears we do have one member of the public in person this item. you want to come forward? yes, okay. u have three minutes to speak and i'll provide with a 30 when your time is about to expire. thank you advocate for things with small wheels.to commend you guys on improvements particularly sensitive to improvements. i live in the e a bit of new pavement going

down and it is l do want to raise a question. something i re about the type of resurfacing that gets don has a particular impact on things with small wheels. this pictur> streets. a slow street. this is 14th street next if you can tell and perhaps easier to new pavement is quite a bit rougher then old pavement there before. there is great new pavemen bryant street going north/south in the mission, however some of the othethat go nouth/south of the rougher texture. itwith small wheels and much more likely small children who fall or elderly who fall don't understand the nature of the metric thesif it s aris just about pothole jz hawith the smoothness and newness of the surface, how [indiscernibleas always there is a opportunity for san francisco to lead the way and standards then applied more regionally to make this is particular concern to me because i think at the end the day spend a lot of money to do this

and i understand how this type of pavement will be a cost saving measure, but it equitable travel through different regions and concerned are not receiving notice of the type of pavement they are receivy be less passable for the modes they use. [indiscernible] ank you. >> than we have no in-person commenters and there are no callers who interest in speaking on this item. >> thank you. please call the consent calendar. 3 is general /÷your pardon. thank you. >> item 3 is generpu topics under the commission mandate but not a specific item on today's agenda. members of the public who make three minutes of general public comment in person may line up the wall from the door and commenting outside the chamber, press the raisin the webinar or star 3 on your phone to be recognized.

mr. [indiscerniblee in person commenter. you have three minutes to speak and get a 30 second chime. >> to the thing i came to speak about.15th and natoma. this is a mission. this particular building a block away from myself placed public works barricades on the sidewalk for the barricades are there all most every day.1 at least 5 times because they are t compliant. yesterday i saw they have been put not only between the traffic and sidewalk and also between the sidewalk anbuilding front, so this is aimage yesterday. you can see here the but has been blocked and access from curb to here is a woman who is wager

least 70 years old getting out of a to walk an feet to get around the barricades. eybike locks provided for the people who live in building. this is a year milar problem. again, a year ago on a different date, somebody with k. i are return to the video to make my point.of public works is willing infrastructure to private citizens or for the of private property in a way that compromise people. people who usor rely vending in the street, nes or strollers and i like to offer there segnificant difference between the proposed actrins of the organization. i understand why infrastructure is made available to owners to block the right of way. i don't believe it is legal iant so i have a ton of questions about this and like to

efficacy of 311 because it doesn't seem to matter report this, bu account. people seem to pay fines if they receive any and persist putting reaze street. it isn't equitable or just and don't understand why it is ve someone to look into that. thank you. >> have questions for the speaker, please, if you can return to the podium. yreports with 311 about the issue? >> numerous times overthe last year. >> thank you. have you attempted to reach works staff directly, called anybody? >> i owed with 311 if that has put me with public works i had people say-one people i talked to saw nothing. they looked at the wrong ged it in the 311 report using the app. >> yep. commissioner turner. >> director short, i have been on a one thing i came back was the summer is getter warmer, kids

skateboarding down hills. to help protect the right of way, protect the publicictures seemingly are in some of those places where we in collaborative way with the city are trying mitigate multiple hazards happening at one time. can to-we will see this occurrence coming more and more. and more importantly balance right of way access, but also people have commandeered as a right of way? >> thank you commissioner turner. carla short, director. yeah, it is a tricky balancing just want to note that we do respond there are inspectors i think we see this we may go out and we engage e party and they may make a the previous condition after we have left. we see thutinely with the illegal vending when we try to enforce also, many of the barricades are at the request

another city department, soewe don't rricades-we don't provide barricades to let me not say generally but be specific. the intersection an 15 and mission is intersection on the weekends with a lot of people gathering and and so i'm without being familiar who requested my guess would be the police may have they were provided for that purpose. about the access from the curb to the e sidewalk did meet ada from what i could see otos, so we are always looking to have-to is ada access for the public right of way, but crowd of people also is a blockage and so we y to manage those two different things. >> and we do not have other or commenters over the phone. >> thank you, please call the next item. is the consent draft minutes

from june 24, 2024 meeting of mmission, and also includes four contract awards and contract modifications, but now excludeswhich was postponed l the next-until the september 9 meeting 4n, which will be heard following item 6. echave been made in the draft minutes and these corrections are reflectedposted on the commission's website. calendar items can be heard individually upon request by a ic and adoption of the consent calendar and all resolutions contained in it is an action item.motion is made, i'm happy to take correction any questions. >> thank you. vequestions before we entertain a motion to adopt consent calendar. director short, this new fire training facility to know why the additive alternate coprovide full mep design was not included as initial contract scope of work. it seems that would have

avoided the requirement this modificatio carla short, director. i don't know if project manager ryer might be able to answer that we were not able to include could you repeat your question? >> yes, certainly.fire training facility mep design. why the capital additive alternate cost to provide the full mep designs was of the initial contract scope of work. we today. if it was there to we wouldn't need to modify it today. that is all i wahave to get back to you with that. apology we >> thank you. i it seems that our director management may be available. >> great. >> [unable to hear speaker]

i'm not hold up maybe more meeting. >> we can do a follow-up. sure it answered my question, but it sounds like-that's uld be a funding thing. available or something. okay. >> it sound to the-we

did this alternate proposal at the same time, but we were presuming we model and then realized it was prudent to go with this additive alternate o that is why-it was initially included,go down that path initially, but i'll get more more prudent to switch. >> if i add, taylor, deputy city attorney in public procurements, it is quite common that you have wh you put enout initial solicitation, you put a base scope of work you ask all proposers to bid or propose on.be other scopes that at the time of be contemplating, but might enough funding at the time to fund there might be are contemplating putting in the project in the future so you add them what is called, additive alternates. sometimes they might be--let

certain type of tile and in the base scope you would of the mill tile. yourfancier and more expensive and you are sure whatfunding might. add alternate can be additional scope or sloitly different scope so e put in to allow proposers to give information, sometimes pricthose alternates so that once the project is start the project maybe more funding comes in anda alternate, or also if it might add later, by including procement you get a public pricing and public proposal on if it is design it might be for that thing might be. it s like sometimes they mentioned mep, mechanical plumbing scope. that is done as design build done later. it sound here they might have decided notthat scope of work into design build, design where you produce full architectural documents.

>> a helpful clarification. thankvery much. i also then had open to my colleagues on these were some of the workforce development grant extensions. my quesjust one, is if the two stop and street cleaning contract be in effect 25 so we don't have to amend them month of june? hello deputy director robertson.

[no audio] >> thank you very much. it sound it is overall a budget problem we have a starts july 1 but don't get a budget until mid-august and that is a day why that is a problem. commissioner turner. >> i of a general comment around those samitems and think we had a lot also want to commend staff a lot of

progwe continue to really push forward our ent training and programming, i see mr. hill in the background.a tremendous job, particularly with deputyare clear of our goals with workforce development and w how those investments are important. who are stewards of the funds. i want to responsibility and the city fiduciary responsi biards, so this is a understanding, budgetary kind of quag myer we have the but i do want to be mindful that these and changes for these non profits that they also need to accountable for and that is what i'll look for. i'm proud of the work y day, but being dependent upon others we need to make sure that we about our expectations, outcomes and goals particularly since it has been about 9 monthsand started working, i have seen nothing but think the efficiency with the small amount of money that goes to s.

>> agree wholeheartedly.other comments, as we ask-as the commission asked for forward at the end of the 18 month contract period for a these six contracts and ththe department point of view and grantees point of view.d them to come back so look forward to the end of the for a full report ow everybody thinks they are going or >> thank you for that. commissioner turner and commissioner post. and my team and have cadence and looking at the approved the the urban forest is here. we meet with [indiscernible] cyc and hunter point family, so i lookcing that report and think it will be thorough and robust. >> thank you very much. commissioner zoubi. >> those increases, they were all the budget presented? orrect. >> these increases are included in the 10 percent plus the 5 percent cutsthat we presented? >> correct. that was a bit of as we are working with the

mayor's office to submv june 1, and then work wg the board of supervisors their review happened in a hold up is we were not sure number would be. all threductions that were submitted and approved and accepted by the board supervisors are included in these amounts and we have sufficient the items before you today. >> are we going to have a update >> yes. budget staff are working on that report.shortly after the mayor signed in mid-august.a similar timeline this go-round as welt.have seen preliminary draft. we are working on it and mauíking sure no numbers change. >> thank you. >> thank you. commissioner turner reminded me racuchal non profit since they took the time and trouble to come to want to come to the podium and say hello orlike to acknowledge when people make the effort. >> good morningchr and commissioners, brian friends of the my only comment is that, we are looking forward to continuing to partner with public works to meet the goals

of our not only workforce development, training folks in getting placed in permanent full time employment for thousands of trees across our city, so i to also commend public works staff. the last timewas up here we talked about delays in invoicing and are payment and i want to record we have seen improvement in that from our end over the last e that positive relationship, particularly with the team. thank you. thank you for want to come to the podium or will that do it? i just want to be sure. thank you all for coming. the changes we mention one item will be postponed to and another heard on the regular calendar, i move to ar. is there a second? thaichck. thanller, please open the motion to public comment. wish to make three minutes of comment in person on motion to approve item 4, the consent calendar and all

in it, excluding 4b and 4n up against the wall furthest from the door. s raise your hand button in the webinaron your phone to be recognized okay mr.--we need you to the wireless microphone that is right in the middle there. sorry, it is so many microphones and you have three minutes to speak and you get second warning. >> thanks very much.sure i understand. the sidewalk inspection repair at a separate meeting? our xt regular meeting september 9, exactly. >> go okay. not appropriate then to make comments it? given the documents are made available the-- >> [indiscernible] >> it is up make them in september. >> there is enough the organization here i think it makes sense to say some [indiscernible] helpful support in this. i want to note that the ion of

the program ondliance and the need to update streets and my understanding, there is a sole bidder for this.say, disappointed there isn't more outreach to find more bidders fwr a sole bidder. there is curb ramp illation, street resurfacing. street resealing. grinding and paving an:xd in there about making sure that sidewalks are ramps and everything else are to speck. the reason i bring this because, i mentioned before and thank you director short set up me engineers. the current design of the city driveways standard and so despite the fact ers told me drive ways for cars and not here the design of the lip is for drainage and not they are not ada compliant and do not th. i'm concerned that we are going millions dollars after a single bid and looking at the documents does not include adstbe ada compliant. it seems a gross oversight to me. mentioned again and again,

riding down things of small wheels one has to be the quality of the driveway lip, because not only are with the current design and beyond the scope of what is dangerous to be riding thin street which we dangerous to transition to the sidewalk, we are legally allowed to do because the current definition set fort by the city do notof the street, despite being a ss in san francisco. i understand this is moved to later date, but i like to the project revised to include the grinding down of driveway to be beveled as specified by the in section 303.1, such that actually see those areas made more >> your time is up. thank you. other in person commenters and raised their hand to speak over the phone as well, so that comment. >> thank you. if thmore questions, all in favor of approving the consent calendar

say aye, or yes. passes unanimously. it is adopted and the resolutions will be posted to the 's website. secretary fuller, please call the >> turning to the regular calendar, joint development technical advisory services sfmta potrero yard modernization project. bureau of project and the earthquake safety and emergency present the contract modification. continue using that wireless remote. it wip >> thank you. chair post, commissioners. i am to introduce one colleague from mta will walk through esentation about the project in request by she was curious about the project. it is a high profile projec this is managed by san was more appropriate for the drether of the program to my part here is to approval of modification number five.

[unable to this is--under contract with public works and we service management consulting service and this is request for $578 thousand to their h would make the entire contract ou4 million, 771 dollars and we'll extend the services, which include financial, and technical advisory serv 2026, which is june 30, 2026. is is-qul think that concludes my introduction of and request fo

your approval. with that, i am turning it to over to [indiscernible] >> good morning commission.is potrero yard. just to pgive back this is the first public private partne is part of a larger multi-billion referring to as the building progress program, and ththe first of what we hope are several modernize our facilities, improving transit access to san franciscans across the allowing us to bette meet our mandate to electify our by 2040. talk about what that means. this improves efficiency. i guess i should back up.is a 109 year old bus facility. it is trolley

coach facility. hundred years ago and was originally built fot cars, so it is highly inefficient because we are in a of vehicles and maintenance required for the vehicles.only to consolidate all our electric this one facility, but also improve conditions and maintenance staff and then set the stdoing these types of presidio yard and other yards in the future. of course, susta key component, as i mentioned.fully electric fleet by 2040 is our this helps us kind of start moving the achieving that. additionally, by improving this cility, replacing it with a new state of the art facility, we are crease the number of buses that operate out of fuisility by roughly 80 percent. this says 54 but we are

looking at joint development as a way community beyond just sit operations. here you can rendering of the potrero yard and you notice there is not just cility here, but we are also looking to include to 465 units of affordable and workforce housing on in fact, a portion of the workforce housing thatslated for construction atop the podium, are looking to also have some preference mta staff, including those operations and maintenance staff at potrero yard, which again increases efficiency, instead of many staff having to distances at hours where bart es are not running.u will see in the foreground is along bryant streets the first phase of affordable housing is planned there. roughly a hundred units give or take of planned family housing at that site that would

the point 4 acres. we are onedge of districts 9 and 10. there are currently 6 transit routes out of potrero yard and i believe i covered most of already, but again, this is about 109 yea it is also not-has not been ed, so this is also a way to insure that the building alo safe, both for our staff as as the community. showing on the slide, briefly again about 246 electric trolley buses slated for storage and operation at the site. ans we'll have roughly i believe working on different shifts in the building, so may necessarily be in the building at the same time, but oviding ample facilities for them to be able to use and also this future training facility. i alluded to, climate

action is a important part of for electrifying our fleet improving efficiency of the building itself. this does also meet our equity goals by improving transit to those that need it the most in the community. this serves communities throughout the city, including the adjacent hill neighborhood. and then as i mentioned, the affordable housing will actually be not just the bryant street phase, but there be two additional phases on top of the bus yard, includin affordable and workforce housing. looking at 465 total units with bedroom 776. there have been flucthroughout the process of going through thfor that is, initially the brystreet housing was seen as a housing development, which would have included more units, buthe decision to

transition that a family housing building the have to reduce to the overall bedroom count continues to be consistent. a couple other things that are worth pointing out. one e amenities planned for the new potrero yard is much requested public restrooms for adjacent franklin square park as well commercial spaces for locally serving retail.then in addition, several improve ment to the street scape this block. in terms of the scale our outreach, i think it is important to note that of why we started this project with outreach in late throughout the process, we have insuredand public comment has informed th project throughout the process. in fact, we have a neighborhood working group that meets

monthly brought up to speed ng going on with the project and their input again, incorporated throughout. we have a developer the developer team both for the bus yard and the are also present in those meetings so we had 150 public meetings and opportunities for be engaged in the project and provide their feedback. so, just showing where we are again, we started the public in 2017 and 2018.first did our actuivate partner s in the project and then we ultimately did bring on potrero neighborhood collective spearheaded by [indiscernible] their office is based in la, of the development team includes several lothe mission district who are ti housing as well as public outreach. our entitlements and environmental the

board of rd earlier this yoor, so we are preparing to release design build contractor who will ultimately actually build so we anticipate currently being on to the board for approval of the project agreement in november, fallowed by approval of the build contractor early 2025 90 days we expect the developer to mobilize to begin decommission site, demolishing the existing structure and beginning construction roughly a four year process frobeginning to end where potrero yard would be online early 2029. i apparently didn't slides there. where -with that , thanu i'm available along with mag dulina for questions. >> thank you

much mr. lazaro. good to see you again. i do have questions.ich should i do? i will start at the top.covid pandemic changed transit ride city. this project was startone could have predicted.post covid ridership effected and how has that changed fwr the project if it has? >> thank you for that question. my understanding from our director jeff ership especially on many bus know we fully hia few key rounts.one example we exsided is south van ness brt line.part of our strategy for improving ridership and achieving that pre-covid ridership and exceeding it is kinds of improvements so we fully by improving efficiency and getting the vehicles on the streets for needed maintenance and repairs, this will support that. again, i think we have been on

the trajectory of continuinsee ridership increase, especially including these bus routes that operate >> great. thank you. that is . to deliver, which i find excessto commend the city on public outreach, what you described is what is excessive amount a neighborhood activist who appreciates and think it is very participate in city government and give feedback, so -qul know if that is what they are demand, but sounds excessive public engagement and be effecting the timing of this project. i also wondered if back in commission, your board ever considered bringing-delivering the project inhousing expert runs the show. that one of the using delivery departments runs this as a has the bus yard, but it is more a partnership

between at knows how to build i deliver housing and how-what is needed in a transit ain i'm sure left the station many been hearing about this project a long time and showed long time and will go again, was this primarily a housing project rather then transit project? great questions. couple clarifications.eveloper team was brought on november 2022, so that really isoff the design process. much of what is again, related to actually determining what are the yard itself, what is the community lo for in terms of what kind of building beng to accept in terms of height and how units is considered acceptable to the so, couple things--so, again phase begin in late 2022, we are really and so from 2022 through 2029 for the size and scope of this project quite

on track actually to stick with the schedule set out for back in 2017 when was first developed. as far working group, i think one thing that i didn't the presentation, there are many pieces of thing. there is also public art, there is things that are kind of tied into this project that we insure the public is in the driver seat of the way, and then as far as which direction to start the project from. envisioned as a bus yard supporting development being this bus yard is really the key not only to improving mta operation across the board, but it does domino future projects that we intend to deliver and a current property that the mta does own and so, the housing was se the community wanted and we of are supportive that and i very much look forwaras

well, but it very much has to be first fallowed by the housing. >> i'm not questioning the need >> sure. >> speaking of housing, om senior to families, but given the dire siion of housing in san francisco, particularly the past couple years d can't seem to build too much housing, is building more housing in the 465 units? and this might be a place to put something since the project hasn't been built yet? >> the to 465 housing units and based on the that the developer team has been doing over the past couple years to figure what is financially, the 465 is really pretty much at the cap of what can be accommodated here. that being said, again, we have sites that also we are looking at there to incorporate housing on but that is what can be accommodated there today. sion is made and late to the party and fully

aware that, rer and citizen of the city. i'm still unclear, but think you tried to address wh to g public engagement, maybe covid, all of the above. i would like to ask, how expectations on this project gone positively or neg is learned along the way and what are you pleased about dismayed about and have any of those >> i'll just mention, i think again the fact community throughout this process has really when we went to both the mta board and the board of supervisors earlier this year with entitlements and our tal review, that that was done out any opposition. there was no appeal to the environmenta believe that was due to the fact that the public at large involved at every st we continue to post all the #m we have a e-mathat goes out every a new there and

drafted and try to stay in front of the believe that is paying off in of the support we are seeing for the project. well we are benefit from? we are looking lessens learned that could be applied to city projeblths. have to get back to you. the fact we are fairly close to the schedule we or i think is a good sign. >> great. thank you very much.very high profile project. a very needed projectt. i'm excited to see it completed so thank you for commissioner turner. >> i like to p commissioner post left, which is, i'm amazed. i have been on vacation in the middle of y and was so eager to gethe amazing things we do and this is one of the projects.not sure many yards outside hudson yard in new york where people are take advantage the communities through projects, but

we are delivering as housing reflective of the community and need. not i'm proud to see how the took advantage of valuable land and sto take advant age of density. i have a things. as we get moving through this. there is think a really important point chair post is making which is, scale replication and also the uniqueness of some of the we are happy to play a make sure our role is really clear, and so one that often people lose sight 06 who is who.to make sure folks know project is important and encourage our team to make sure it is clear and the role we are playing, because again, as we are many multiple projects, i about the civil grand jury report and how those projects are so unique and and are delivered every last one of

them so proud partnered with you and will be good stewards accountable and have to point out challenges as chair post pointed anwe can scale and replicate. i got my eye on a couple and others i love to see housing, particularly officers and fire officers, ck to the city the place they serve so i thank you and look forward learning more is a scapeable and project for public works. >> thank you. >> commissioner zoubi. the presentation.project and it hits two birds with one stone. my question is, is there a place where i can maybe online or just to read r the community input, rather then just outreach? i can see there is outreach. a talks to the neighborhood, every month, but is ther san francisco can go and look at the input wthe community?

like what are they afraid of if they like, is there a place can y can rethank you. we have the potrero yard project where we continue everything, historically from the project and our meeting minutes from all the neighborhood group meetings, as well as all the documents again related ceqa and entitlements are all there. in addi proactively go out to events throughout in fact, we will be doing more this that we give people in the public an opportunity to share if ere about concerns about, that we address those either there in or on the website in some way. >> for example, ever neighborhoods they have are there letters from these associations approving or not e or giving input and feedback or n2ní

>> many letters were submitted in and environmental review, but also we applied for grant is spring and received letters of support for that applicof the community, friends of franklin square being g others, so yes, absolutely. >> thank you. my n is, there were four modifications in the five years. should we anticipate one coming next year? how do you see oject and do you think there will be a need for >> this should be the last modifi moving into the project agreement next year and so a separate agreement with for advisory services tied to that the last for that. >> thank you. >> you said sfmta is the >> we have a-this is a p3, we have a-thve will be more or less overseeing design build partnership with sfmta, yes.

trero neighborhood collective. what is that? >> that all of the developer team, developer and so they will design build contractor rfp and then working contractor directly for delivery of the bus yard, but of that will be our bus d, we will be involved ever step of the way. >> sorry, not familiar with plannery america. >> they are large company. a local office in la who >> thank you very much. director short, what will public work role be in this project? >> we will also have management responsibility as well so in partnership with the mta to deli helped lead the pre-development phase. f knew that, so thank you very much. that's great newsno further questions or comments on d

--no tg it is contract modification, so i'll second that motion. we do have ers of the public who wish to make person on the motion to approve item 5, the joint development technical advisory services for yard modernization, may line up against the wall furthest from the door. if you are commenting outside raise your hand button in the webinar or star be recognizeve three minutes to please the middle wireless microphone that might be easier for you to use. get a 30 notice with your time is about to expire. >> great. look frgward to this. thank you for your questions. really lovely. commissioner turner mentioned public works and municipal transit authority are one agency. something i continue to come back to here is the fact that is

so much extra work being done, so many tax dollars and siloed conversation because you have oners and two if you consider the split here and so much work getting replicateed and opportunities are missed as showing on the screen, if we me and my friends in the back of a you can 4 bikes on a bus you can fit as many skateboards as you can people. sothe discussion is the sidewalks and space around the is opportunities for invasion there. i appreciate all the questions around quk and everything else are addressed in the documents on the look at it. just want to note there are opportuworks to engage as far as curb design goes her^ especially considering accessible of low income people and people in wheelchairs and if with [indiscernible] continue to limit access given how long the given insistence on climate mitigation, gichben [indiscernible] a feature focused organization anensity. as i said, designing things small

wheelicize a way to encourage multi-modal a ses and reduce carbon emission and give younger older people access to transit. seattle is working on this. working on beveled edges with es in and out of the mobility lane.that a softer bevel is we dont have significant space beyond sort of tree basin such it could be used as a tside the main thoroughfare of the sidewalk. again, this area here could be widened such likebe more accessible.

contribution. your comments. we do not have any further in person commenter jz do not have an callers who expressed inest interest in this item so that concludes comment. >> thank you. no furt in favor of the contract modification for the modernization project say aye or yes. the motion carries and the contract modification resolution will be posted to the it is now 1027. we will have to take a break at 1040 to 11 o'clock, i anticipate the zuckerberg item taking mo10 or 15 minutes, yet i don't apology to mr. chen and his colleagues, let's get sta now please and sorry you will have to like to keep moving. >> item 6 is zuckerberg san francisco general grade and renovation and project manager

this contract modification. it is an action item. >> testing. good morning ch chair zoubi, commissioner turner. my name is joe manager for 2016 health program joined by [indiscernible] department of public health. we jackson, interim deputy chief capital prrpand jason capital planning director.on the zuckerberg san francisco general building 5 seismic up grade and renovation contract.

sorry. public works consideration and approval to approve incrthe contract cost and duration contingency and authorize public works toove future modification for this contract. the revised contract amount at 94 million, 662 thousand, 95 9 cents which includes all approved change orders to date.works is requesting commission approval to increase cost contingency by 25 76 dollars.e duration by 572 consecutive days.requesting approval to increase the contract contingency bidding and buy out and execution of change the projects. all project included is in building 5 on the campus potrero avenue distri the project clients for this projethis department of for the project is

provided by the public health and safety bond program. dph levereraged funding the 2020 health recovery bond program general funds as well foundation gift donation funds. the architect of record is architecture with public works and lbe architectural firm. public works targeting to projects by second quarter 2026.part of the scope of work is part of dph long-term plan to convert building 5 into outpatient care ated specialty clinics on or off campus to building 5. unlike more typical public asked to deliver 6 permitted [indiscernible] one of the typical project delivery method allows public works to select a general contractobased on lowest price but finding

most qualified based on project experience be most successful. the six projects are up grade, relocation, health laboratory, it infrastructure, psychiatric emergency service and clinical laboratory.of the complexity of hospital construction. the need to have a or prior to construction start for logistics and inspection control plans ews and investigation as as develop construction schedule. the seismic upgrade includes corgand work scope coordinated and completed with ç"# construction activities for lab, pes and public by utilizing the method, we are with one general contractor able to plan construction activi projects which avoids the blame game when you working with multiple general contractors that need to share e. all the tasks are performed by the cmpart of pre-construction prior to

the next two slides update of all six projects. i wont go through but let me mention few keylights. you get a sense different level. lab is target completion by third quarter 2024. seismic, it pes, seismic ap grade is most complete at on location completed. more then happy to g locations are the most challenging, because the team will be fobunew foot [indiscernible] pes main renovation is the latest works issued construction on may 13, 2024. this slide provid of the construction cost and contract duration date as remaining cost and dura based on change orders. the contract amount 86 million, 410 thousand, 253 dollars. apprtotal 8 million, 252 thousanand 9

cents which leaves 388 thousand, 319 cents remaining cost contingency reserves. adequate to complete the project. duration is 1429 calendar days equates to final completion date of october even though public works has not approved time date, does not expelast project until second quarter 2026. public works is requesting increase the duration contingency 572 calendar days which result in of 2144 calendar days and allow future ders to extend through september 31, 2026.works request approval to increase cost conaingeon, 923 thousand, 76 dollars which result in limit of 120 million, 974 thousand, llars. the next slide a summary-

>> sorry, i know your stop at 11. i wanted to know if he say to the commission before we take our break? >> sure. e >> sorry to cut you off. madam chair, commissioners, mack primo, a oversight advisor for director of health commission. insight how we so, we developed as go on frequently with d about 50 to 60 capital managers omwell as ambulatory care. wecall, safe building program that stwith the city cpc capital plan, and so we do granular 10 year capital plan buildings, upcoming bond issues, what's sueess, the capacity has and how we fit into that with the all the other departments in the city.the 2016 bond that joe was

referring to, just a that was proposed 2015 and the ask at the the bond was 350 but shared byso the zuckerberg piece got 222 million even though the estimate was 330. this is whey and thank god we have the san francisco is embarking on $220 mi specifically for building 5 and those buildings also, we have done grant jason is here the executive projcan talk about a huge grant we got from the state. we are piecing together things and we do meet department wide to make decisions specifically did an analysis. remember when. we used outside resources achieve what we needed to do versus tearing it the 330 or $1.3

billion to do a new one. rs if we took it down we would have about a ocess and so by keeping it there doing a structural upgrade, we are able to get a categorical exemption, so that is paperwork and we are able to speed up the other operational issues that critical to keep four things functioning at that is psych emergency service, the cafeteria that is conne in the new building that supplies e pharmacy en -joe, what is the other function? the clinical lab.each other even though they are two structures. and finished in 2015 and the older renovatingism there is bridge that out there it is insightful to go through and see the physicians and nurses and lab work and to take place between those two buildings, soci to keep it, because we don't have any point on the

24 acre campus, the ucsf transactional research building was built we have very little space to do anything, so if we were it down, build new, we have to do pharmacy, temporary kitchen and temporary would just go away when the building wa throwing the money decision to keep it. we were locked in on so example how we look at each decision. we currently office and controller and bruce on is being proposed by the mayor and peskin for november, so with the same strategic into each of these things. if there-i know you have a-i you have a hard stop. any questions? that was very helpful and thank you for asking the question any questions for mr. primo thank you so much. very useful and helpful. we will now break t's plan for 11. let's plan for 11 o'clock.until >>

we are back in session. the wait and thank you mr. chen for your patience and courtes please continue with your presentation. >> thank you. you commissioners. as i mentioned earlier, the next slide is a graphical summary of duration coningeancy calculation.

the approved contingency of 143 and this contract, it was planned to have because . [indiscernible] received plan approval ntract awarded and start pending completion [indiscernible] the bottom 6 bars duration in yellow and blue bar the time extension needed complete the project. because the project separated to permitted projects. the fi2021 and include the hazardous material abatement [indiscernible] the second is main renovation and build back. the project team decided to utilize the strategy resu learned from past projects. that demolition scope first. eleminate concern conditions and [indiscernible] we have seen in other projects. completion of

demolition, proceeding with early scopes to complete the floorning and new wall layout. completed the floor scanwas able to identify conflects prior to construction start and start avoid the conflicts. this was a where over 60 percent of the new walls in conflict with g floor conditions. the main renovation project was also always 0ustart construction much later then the project because was still in design the project did not receive plan approval the early demolition completed october 2023. [indisce because the rehab department relocation project which was outside the scop work for this contract. this project managed by public d awarded to bill group as the general contractor. the delays to project were driven by combination of unforeseenisting conditions that were identified as non and [indiscernible] damaged by a contractor. correction of these issued impacted

project completion. public works increase to the cost and duration contand time true reconciliation, higher bid prices and change orders. contract structure is based on cost estimate provided by puks during the request for proposal phase. thcmgc is unboarded and task completed trade packages bid out to the trade contractors, the actual cost of the project are finalized.ess to true up and reconcile the differences between the cost es the higher bid prices public work received for ssitated the need for dph to make difficult decisions regarding the 3+ project that were part of the contract. [indiscernible] removed from the cmcg co a contractor selected in the future. because the limitations, the health center is phased to proceed with e project is in the bidding

phase targeting to award the bid build contract the third quarter of 2024. [indiscernible] also placed on hold during design until new funding souried. public works is working with dph to the project and targeting to proceed to by 2026 2027. another cost reductionfor the it infrastructure. the original scopeng the build ouf outelectrical low voltage infrastructure for the building and existing and new teledata rooms. the scope for the determined to be higher priority as needed to support the isting and new teledata rooms. implement the electrical and low voltage scopes in the and possibly incorporate into future of the 25 million increase to cost contingency, million is needed to complete the bidding tructure. the remaining 16 million is for public received and not approved of future change t completion. the 572 calendar day ration contingency

is needed to allow completion ofseismic upgrade and pes targeted to achieve final completion seconof 2026. project team is always trying to better be able to more accurately forecast construction budgets for the brilding projects.with operational [indiscernible] ng code issues make it challenges. these are factors contractors increase pricing for perceived risk ect themselves. the project team is trying example, working existing buildings one of the greatedesign is constructable based on traints above ceiling. designers typically use as built to map possible routes for piping and duct work in the overhead space which is no. accurate. not all changes are documents and not does show the space in three dimension.

public works is with cmcg partner for field possible to better map out the existing as using laser scanning to providbuilt computer model tuesday share with trade contractor which reduce the fear factor that trade contractors include in the bid price to ac another strategy is team embraced is complete demolition there is limited number of e contractors willing to work in hospital construction, we have [indiscernible] each to trade contractors to talk to them and garner interest in bidding on r more trade contractors willing to submit bids means es. depending on the scope of ks is work wg cmgc to better ge these perceive risks embedded in the bi public works and dph understand moraints will increase the bid pricing, so to the is working with dph to identify opportunities projects that

relocate staff prior to minimize increase cost associated with phasing and reduce labor productivity. at know mr. primo had responded to the question regarding whether rebuild building placement. i went go into more detail and happy to answer any other questions you have regarding just reminder of why public works is here today. public work requesting consideration and approval to approve increase to contract contingency and ove future modifications and that concludes my presentation for today and have. thank you. >> thank you very much mr. chen. for your presentation and we also wafor last week's tour of the constructionthe multiple projects you described today. the difficulty of performing this and efficiently in a active hospital setting and extensive site mitigation

it requires was put it mildly. no punt intended, surgical precision public works and contractors have to work to keep the and clean was again, it pleasant shock, but a shock. i thank you and complement you on the excellent staff at you prepared describing this exceedingly construction project, the staff memo in our ing. it was excellent. and again, thank you forer i sent you alluded a number of processes that you have ng along the way that can be carried forward point on it because i know i have known you you managed non-hospital projects as well. what lessens you just want to point out that you have been learning through zuckerberg project that could be applied to projects overall for any city client? >> thank you for the question that's a excellent question. i say, we llet

and all issues will be resolved, comes to managing general it comes with uncertaintyd of time designers and the team to rush into design and i think what we learned just sometimes it makes more sens run to take the effort to do extent possible. the reason i say to extent possible, e hospital are occupied so it is very open ceiling, cut openings and do inve space is still being operat staff and patients. so, it is delicate plans to nt department and r best to look at drawings that changed, think it does make in the long run to spend effoto do additional field investigation where we can so you can these surprises is typically what delays project. >> thank you. it reminds me of couldn't move everybody out

there. they had towe emergency calls. there are a lot of senior staff room and nice to hear what can be transferred to thank heu. this is a 27 percent rease to project cost and contingency from original contract award, which is considerable but you have given a thorou projected cost turned out to be such odds with for that. i am satisfiewi commissioner turner. >> director short, i believe there is ing plan for $300 million bond issuance, would that impact project and if so, i ope of project meaning more then likely come back to us successful? think-yes, there is still a plan to issue the bond. as i understand it, i think the details of how some of the resources is still being finalized, so sure--as mark primo mentioned,

there is a underway by is the right term. zuckerberg. i don't know if joe knows whether that bond is directly infusing into this project. i know-okay, project manager is saying no.are different buildings that that bo would support. >> commissioner zoubi. >> i do want to piggy back and thfor the great tour of the hospital building 5, and exact example of engines mid-flight, but i saw everything was organized and again, i love partnership with public health and how you working together with them. i know i ask a break-down of $25 million and the other night i was like, what ask just ask? so thank you

i just want to ask the as commissioner turner.already started those six projects, right? we alre, start working. should extension or increase in the next to 12 months? >> commission zoubi, thank you for the question. based on what know today, we don't anticipate coming back to commis this approval if approved by the does include contingency for based what we know based on current projects. we have a few projects complete so minimum riskism clean lab we will be finishing up months so we already have a smaller change or the one project that just startsing which psychiatric emergency service, so we carried to allow us to finish c

thongect. prongect. >> thank you very mitch. much. a motion-did anyone want to knh the podium and add a word to what mr. chen said today, since you hing. you dont have to. you can handle it? okay. great. i we approve this contract thank you there is a motion to approve and second. please open the motion comment. >> members of the public who utes of comment in person on the motion to approve item 6, the zuckerberg san francisco general hospital building 5 seismic upgrade renovation contract modificationagainst the wall. if commenting outside your hand button in the webinar or star 3 on your phone be recognized. we have commenters in person this item, and "qdo not have callers

either so that conclude public comment. thank you. if no other questions, all in motion please say aye or yes. aye. the motion carries contract modification resolution will be posted to the commission's website. qr mr. chen. we will now take the itemfrom the consent calendar postponed for another zuckerberg hospital 4h. >> the item is th different general hospital building 5 3 contract modification and this item was originally consent calendar, but pulled to individually. here toprint print the report. 4n. >> good morning everyone. good vice chair zoubi, er, director short and city attorney. oject manager with san francisco public works. i'm here to present the ing 5 rehab

department relocation and the 3 construction contract modification. thanpleasure meeting a few of you last week. thred so i'll give background information. approval to increase the contract cost contgethe duration contingency for the h the original approved contract amount 4 million, 103 thousand, 914 do today we are seeking approval for thousand, 624 dollars 395 consecutive calendar days. the contractor reason this will allow us fl execution of change orders including time extensions to complete the project. as discussed, the client is department of public health. the program is funded by the 2016 public health and safety bond.receiving additional funding resources from the sfogh n. donation. the architect of record is of

architecture:constructor is klp construction. [indiscernible] 490 calendar the projected completion april 25, 2024. this fallowed traditional design bid build contract.e scope is in the building 5, similar the other projects mr. chen presented on phase 1 and phase 2, the rehab department area shown in the light blue. our current work of phase ghted in yellow and the out-patient urology clinic, waste holding area and accessible restrooms. currently the project is ab 51 percent complete with our areas, urology area has the partition ing on hvac, waste holder area e partition wall instillation. accessible restroom is ongoing and have framing instillation

and the 3c accessible restrooms are just starting the construction barriers. here is contract amount. the original construction amount was million, 730, 831 dollars.orders to date totaled 258 dollars for total revised of--sorry, that is a error. not $9 million. the approved contingency reserve to original contract amount, and is 114 thousand 665.the contract duration, the original dbstantial completion and final completion was 550 days reserves of 55 days. we have not approved any additional to date. in summary, what we are today is an additional acontingency reserve ofrcent of 559, 624 d for authorized

contract limit of 4 million, 663 thousand, 539 dollars. for the construction duration, we are asking for additional 395 days for total duration of and projected final completion of 20, 2025. this slide helps summarize the change orders approved date. change orders totaling 258, 417 dollars have been executed. the top right column executed to date, with the errors of thousand. sorry, 123 thousand, 358 unfores conditions of 250 thousand, 822. a client request deduct of 9672 ted issue of see on the right, we do a

rigorous summary of all the into our approval two design errors requested was one that was related to bid out between phase 1 and phase 2, versus phase 3, drawings from the set. they were separate d so piping was missing from the orinand added as a cost of the othedesign error was a mising exam it was not additional and needed to be added rooms the major additional change orders we are seekoved but not yet executed because it exceeds the time extension due to eseen conditions related to existi>í conditions, framing conditions, mold, hand over from dph due delayed the construction process. that is calendar days,

with 133 of compensable and associated cost of $163.324. as joe before working, very complex and renovation projects in general are much more difficult but when you are trying to keep a operational hospital and limit to the hospital, it could be further and often change orders exceed the construction duration contingencies. existing building, reinforced concreate strequire expertise in scanning delays. there is many unforeseen conditions mechanical electrical and we have environmental health and safety edures and infection control plans can delay the start of the work. in this case ,b the rehab phase 3 started due to approval that infection co plan. and lastly, we are under the [indiscernible]

tion information. this requires addit oversight through material operations. we have field walks with staff. review from the field staff officers and daily om the inspector of record. approval of dification will allow public works to continue to approve modithe work. in summary, again, today we are seeking increase contract cost and duration contingency by $559.624.71 and 395 consecutive calendar days. >> thank you very much. nice to see you again and again, thank last week. i really pulled together the after learning late last week. all my questions and thank you very much. i thought it was a complement to mr. chen's presentation, so thank you. together very nicely. commissioner zoto page 22?

>> page 22. don't have this presentation in - >> it should be a continuation of joe's you. it was a clear inpage, the break-down of the reasons why this is something i to see future presentations we get. this is--so, we asked all these questions. what is going on?why is there extension of time? can we put up, please? on my computer. >> yeah, on the right side. is great. you even workion, how long that cost. how much that commend you on this. i haven't seen this before and to make request any extension and increase in the to have this. now can look at this and say okay, i

get it. ank you. >> no problem. public works team cm team does job tracking and vetting all the change orders. us analysis. we don't approve them easily and always have backup documentation. >> i share commissioner zoubi's good point about contican bring up one more time ge it just--the items listed on the left, start seeing this regularly and tracking it we can see trends in all this often is the client requested delays and how often unforeseen conditions particularly grand jury criticized the department for a we will always need to be able to respond towe are tracking the reasons for things and we will al when it is public works mistake or reason, but wealways understand when it is out of anyone's control,

such and the like. when is client request. i are agree, this is a great table to see in reports going forward. commissioner turner. clear, is that table produced as project management software? >> it is from the construction they tabulate every request and have final numbers have a projection. it goes through a if it is above a threshold we have a view it and once it approved change order is tagged with a type rangingn omission or design error, clientquested change unforeseen condition is the most ges, we also have categories that are a result in the panko cmgc or preconstruction, a item missed maybe contiancy, so typically maybe not exactly the same way, but ams are tracking it through an excel log.

>> great.echo my colleagues, because i think if think peperformance metric you can use these points commissioner zoubi rnible] but i do think these are those areas and you they are utilizing the software that can help us consolidate the information in a meaningful way so think that is a great idea. >> thank you. there are no more comments, i will move to this contract modification. is is there a seco please open this item secretary fuller. >> members of public who wish to make three minutes of comment in person on the to approve item 4n, originally on the calendar, the zuckerberg san francisco building 5 department relocation phase 3 contract modification, may line the wall. if commenting the chamber, press raise your hand or star 3 to be recognized. approached to speak

in person and there are not callers who expressed interest either, so item 4 and the motion to approve there is no further discussion or questions. all in favor of thmotion please say aye or yes? aye. and the contract modification is approved. thank you and the resolution will be posted to our weary fuller, please call our next item of business. >> item 7 is designate authorize the commissioner to respond to the civil report from june 20, 2024.;e chair post has volunteered to draft the respondiscuss this action and this is an action item. secretary fuller noted as you s been requested to respond to findings the civil grand jury report. we are not required to do so, , but of course we will going to propose is that i draft ÷.a proposed response from the commission for your

retreat next monday the 29 and grand jury report among ourselves and with can discuss our response to threquest and so, i can clean it up with secretary er can return it to the judge august 19 deadline since we won't be meetjuly 29 and the august 19 deadline. we could call a are not planning to meet again between then. it is an ambitious goal for myself, but i intend what is going on here and why we thoughnice to officially designate draft response subject to your approval at our next meeting. commissioner turner. >> chair post, i don't knt then the process we letter around street conditions and we are grateful that you got our consensus and developed a letter and believe it was issued is the same process we are following here and that process we follow here, given it is

your n behalf of the commission, so i just move that chair we approve you drafting and providing renecessary and applicable the civil grand jury. >> i second that motion. >> thank you. we'll take public comment on the >> members of the public who wish to person on the motion to designate authorize chair post civil grand jury report may line up. press raise your han or star 3 on your phone to óxbe recognized. no one do not have callers who expresse in speaking either. >> thank you. all in favor of e aye or yes. it carries thank you very murch. much. good.is new business.

secretary fuller, if quou can >> item 8 is new business a opportunity for commissioners to suggest business for is a informational item. >> thank you.not have new business. any of my colleagues have business to initiate? hearing none, please open this item to public comment. wish to make three minutes of comment on item 8, new initiated by commissioners may line up against the wall furthest from th commenting from outside hand button in the webinar or star 3 on your phone be recognized. wehave one commenter in you have three minutes to speak. anything to present? your time >> i like to offer that the lling plan by the mta has not been i love to be proven wrong, but at this point my tanding is after a year of community outreach, if not

more, what that really looks like. i argue new include a call by public works to presentation from the people who are putting that program together given the fact it is a currently curb to not include any new designs to that same end, i offer commission should have some sensitivity to wheel access. i'm excited to see there is ard putting in a application for it because i think that perspecmissing from this space. thank you >> thank you for your comments. it does not appear weany other inperson commenters and there are no further ca requested to speak on this item ethank you. alrighty. and do not anticipate further commission business codoesn't have to hang around if they dont want to.i mentioned we will be having a special meeting a from today, monday the 29 off-site.

it is more t rather then a meeting and it the purpose is to works commission response to the civil grand jury report of infrastructure delivery. our next regular meeting where our will take place will be at the end of 9. i wish everybody a pl hear a motion and second to en so moved. alright. and then given the motion we will turn to members of the public who enter closed session to discuss director's evaluation may line up against the wall furthest from the door and if you are commenting from outside the chamber, hand or star 3 on your phone to be recognized. item and we do not have any callers at this that concludes public comment. >> alri hearing no further questions or comments, all in favor of

entering yes or aye. alrighty. we will move to closed sethe public and staff not part of the discussion are asked to we'll take a few minutes for people to exit >> we have ed-exted closed session. please call the next item on the agen is announcement following closed sessionere are no announcements following the closed session. open this item to public comment. >> members of the pub o wish to comment on item 10, announcemay line up against the wall furthest from commenting outside the chamber press raise your hand in the our phone to be recognized no one approached and no one is either, so that concludes public comment. >> thank you. item on the agenda. >> item 11 is the motion regarding to disclose discussion during closed session.

>> thank you. i move that we e discussion heard during closed session. is there a second to my motion? >> thank you. please open the motion to >> members of the public who to not y line up against the wall and commenting outside the chamber, press the raise your hand button in the webinar to be recognized. we have no one eak on this item, and no one is on the phone so that concludes public comment. >> thank you. to not session say aye or yes. the passes unanimously. and i believe secretary fuller we do not need the next 12, the general public comment, correct? >> that's correct. item 12 >> great. we are now adjourned. thank you alyou for helping out today.took so long. thank you very much. [meeting adjourned]

>> manufacturing in cities perfect platform for peoplelivelyihoods and for people to create moreonomic prosperity. i'm kate sosa. i'm cofounder ceo of sf made. sf made is private partnership in the city of san francisco to art, grow and stay right here in san sf made really

manufacturers that sets usapart from other small business support organizations whoe generalized support. everything we dly been developed over time by listening what manufac grow. for example, it would be traditioú/na things like helping them findcapital provide assistance loans help to provide small business with education. we have had some great experience doing what ups or temporary selling events, and maybe the that we did as part of sf made partnership with the city seasartnership with small business creating a 100 company selling day righter hall, in partnership with mayor lee a supervisors, and it was just a wonderful opportunity for many of our smaller manufac be one or two-person shop and who don't have the wherewithal to have their own

dedicated retail store to show products and it comes back to how do we help companies set more money intour businesses and develop more customers and relationships so that they can continue to grow and contin francisco. i'm amy kascel and i'm the owner of amykaschel san francisco. we s line with wedding gowns, and about a year ago we launched a to wear collection. san francisco's a great place terms of clientele. we have wonderful bride and doing really interesting things: ar lawyers, teachers, artists other lik entrepreneurs so really fantastic women to work with. i think to know where their clothes are made and how they're made. >> my name is jefferson mccarly, and i'm manager of the mission bicycle company. sell bikes made here for

people that essentially we sell city bikes made for riding environments. is to build bikes specifically for e a lot about a lot about quality, we care about good like that. when people come in we spend lot of time going to the design wall and we can talk about handle bars, we can see theposition, and we take notes all over the wall. it' shopping experience. paragraph. >> for me as a designer, i love thes going on talk to my cutter my pattern maker, designs. going through the suing room i'm looking at it getting involved, is this what that drape expecting, maybe if we've made a to a dress, which we can do making everything here locally.

years, we've more technical. it's a great place you have to concentrate and things are decisiins are as a small business. >> sometimes it's appropriate to bring in an expert to offer suggestions and in coaching and counseling, and other times we we need to talk to other manufacturers that are f problems, other people that are in the trenches just like ith them a solution that we came up with tows minventory and they can share with me an idea that they had about how to another problem. >> moving forward where we see ourselves down the road, and ten years, is really looking at a business from a ready to wear perspective and making things temindful, mindful of the end user how it's the end piece or a he hadwedding gown are they g it

again, and incorporating that into the end collectio the direction i hear at this point. >> the reason do is we really do see it as a nd making the city something that it has always been and making sure that we're sharing the been blessed with economically and socially as broadening thatstreets commission. today is none day and it is 1003 the roll. good morning. please respond with, esent.

commissioner anderson is present.eusope is present. vice harrison is present. chair hartwig-schulman is pres