0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to the united states. their constitution was rich and i think around the same time as the french constitutional french revolution. so there was and do you like to stays for very important, but there was a whole tendency around the world of different alignment away from the feudalism to and a meritocracy, to the industrial capital. there's some debt. no, no. and, and the united states are a very prominent play range a bit, but again, they're not alone. and this is a very different world in the sense that in the, like a 1000 to years ago or so, and a stage good, full and, and that was it very usually it wouldn't have major repercussions. and of where the one exception 11 important period when there was a cascading collapse of a lot of the state to disrupt the so called and beta gross age collapse. and now of course we have are very connected to the world. so you get it. it's a very different situation and all the other hand, i think the tensions that, that you see rising are comparable to dose in the past, w
to the united states. their constitution was rich and i think around the same time as the french constitutional french revolution. so there was and do you like to stays for very important, but there was a whole tendency around the world of different alignment away from the feudalism to and a meritocracy, to the industrial capital. there's some debt. no, no. and, and the united states are a very prominent play range a bit, but again, they're not alone. and this is a very different world in the...
0
0.0
Apr 17, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
states constitution, and is therefore unconstitutional. >> madame president. >> under the precedence and practices of the senate, the chair has no power or authority to pass on such a point of order. the chair therefore under the precedence of the senate submits the question to the senate. is the point of order well taken? senator from utah is recognized. >> madame president, as wrong as the majority leader was moments ago, in making this particular point of order as to article i of the impeachment articles, article i, remember, refers to the willful defiance by secretary mayorkas of the law. as wrong as he was in making that as to article i, and he was very wrong for the reasons articulated moments ago by the senator from texas, he is even more wrong, far more so with respect to article ii, because article ii accuses him of knowingly making false statements. that is violation of 18 usc, a felony offense. if this is not a high crime and misdemeanor, what is. if this is not impeachable, what is. >> the senator is reminded we are in a non -- >> i move that the senate proceed to closed
states constitution, and is therefore unconstitutional. >> madame president. >> under the precedence and practices of the senate, the chair has no power or authority to pass on such a point of order. the chair therefore under the precedence of the senate submits the question to the senate. is the point of order well taken? senator from utah is recognized. >> madame president, as wrong as the majority leader was moments ago, in making this particular point of order as to...
0
0.0
Apr 17, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
states constitution and is therefore unconstitutional. >> under the precedents and practices of the chair has no power or authority to pass on such a point of order. the chair therefore under the precedence of the senate submits the question to the senate. is the point of order well ta taken? the republican leader is recognized. call the role. >>> sandra: all right, chad, take us through what exactly is happening as we hear chuck schumer speak on the senate floor. >> what chuck schumer was trying to do there was give republicans an opportunity to have some debate, have some points of order on their issues with alejandro mayorkas and talk about this for a while. you usually don't have debate on the floor for such a proceeding in a senate trial but you can do that by unanimous consent. this is where all 100 senators would agree and what chuck schumer was asking for there was one hour of debate on tfirst impeachment article and offer several points of order and an hour on debate on the second impeachment, and one point of order and you have to get all 100 senators to agree to that. the
states constitution and is therefore unconstitutional. >> under the precedents and practices of the chair has no power or authority to pass on such a point of order. the chair therefore under the precedence of the senate submits the question to the senate. is the point of order well ta taken? the republican leader is recognized. call the role. >>> sandra: all right, chad, take us through what exactly is happening as we hear chuck schumer speak on the senate floor. >> what...
0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
states constitution that recognizes embryos or fetuses and in fact the opposite is true.he 14th amend minute says citizens are people that are born. specifically. that's what it says. and so, there is this reaching that is taking place and it's important what you have just said so americans know because you are right. it's been framed this is something that's hyperbolic, and it's something that is unmeasured. people need to just simply be more reasonable in this. but let's remember it is our united states supreme court that acknowledged in 2014 in case called whole women's health a woman is 14 times more likely to die carrying a pregnancy to term than by having an abortion. so abortions are incredibly safe they save women's lives and we are a country where the maternal mortality rate exceeds that of all other nation and rank 55th in the world. and so those facts really matter because what's left on the other side is really a death penalty for women. in country like this. let's just be clear about that. it's very dangerous in this country to care yea pregnancy to term and
states constitution that recognizes embryos or fetuses and in fact the opposite is true.he 14th amend minute says citizens are people that are born. specifically. that's what it says. and so, there is this reaching that is taking place and it's important what you have just said so americans know because you are right. it's been framed this is something that's hyperbolic, and it's something that is unmeasured. people need to just simply be more reasonable in this. but let's remember it is our...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and the constitution of the united states. making a mistake is not what lands you in a criminal prosecution. there has been some talk about the statutes that are at issue in in case. i think they are fairly described as -- statutes, engaging in conspiracies to defraud the united states with respect to one of the most important functions, the certification of the next president. >> i don't want to dispute that particular application of that 371 conspiracy to defraud the united states to the particular facts here. wouldn't you agree it is a very open-ended statutory prohibition? that fraud under that provision, unlike under most fraud provisions, doesn't require any impairment of a property interest. >> it's designed to protect the functions of the united states government and difficult to think of a more critical function than the certification of who won the election. >> as i said i'm not discussing the particular facts of this case but it applies to any fraud that interferes seriously with any government operation, right? >>
and the constitution of the united states. making a mistake is not what lands you in a criminal prosecution. there has been some talk about the statutes that are at issue in in case. i think they are fairly described as -- statutes, engaging in conspiracies to defraud the united states with respect to one of the most important functions, the certification of the next president. >> i don't want to dispute that particular application of that 371 conspiracy to defraud the united states to...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
IRINN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
this law is against the constitution of the united states. will be challenged in court .tok has 170 million users in america. the second international meeting of iran and the african continent with the presence of high officials of african countries among economic ministers of more than 30 african countries , it was held in tehran. president in this conference of necessity. recognizing mutual capacities and trying to realize a complementary economy between iran and africa , mr. raisi said that the technical and engineering capabilities of iran and the resources of african countries are a suitable field for cooperation between iran and africa for the second time. when we entered iran, i was very surprised because. in the past, we had economic relations with iran , but now we are looking for ways to develop and expand these relations. these visits and meetings strengthen relations. and knowledge of the two countries is it possible that we are strengthening this image, which god willing will increase the trade circulation and economic activities between iran and these countr
this law is against the constitution of the united states. will be challenged in court .tok has 170 million users in america. the second international meeting of iran and the african continent with the presence of high officials of african countries among economic ministers of more than 30 african countries , it was held in tehran. president in this conference of necessity. recognizing mutual capacities and trying to realize a complementary economy between iran and africa , mr. raisi said that...
0
0.0
Apr 28, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
united states. 3 1/2 years later, the former president has remained unapologetically defiant. this week, he argued, as you said to a receptive supreme court that he is absolutely immune from prosecution for his offenses. and indeed that all presidents must be absolutely immune from prosecution for the crimes they commit while in the oval office. in order that he and all future presidents will be free to faithfully execute the laws without fear that they will be held accountable for the crimes they commit while in office. that is an absurd argument being made before the supreme court, and it's an embarrassment to the constitution and to our country. this said, the supreme court's is seriously entertaining the presidents argument earlier this week, clearly telegraphing that it was tempted by this preposterous argument. all the while barely even mentioning the question presented to the court for decision. namely, that the former president can be prostic needed for the specific and remain in power again
united states. 3 1/2 years later, the former president has remained unapologetically defiant. this week, he argued, as you said to a receptive supreme court that he is absolutely immune from prosecution for his offenses. and indeed that all presidents must be absolutely immune from prosecution for the crimes they commit while in the oval office. in order that he and all future presidents will be free to faithfully execute the laws without fear that they will be held accountable for the crimes...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that's in the plain language of the united states constitution richard nixon sen. was pardoned by gerald ford with the assumption that he could be prosecuted if that was not an assumption, why would there be a pardon in addition, mitch mcconnell, after the impeachment trial, stood on the senate floor and said, there, where procedurally i we're not going to convict because the justice system can hold this man accountable. the problem in this moment is if you look at donald trump, he, we've never had a president like him. we've had 240 plus years of no need for immunity for criminal uniform. president's, the political system works. the other checks and balances work. donald trump mode through every other guard rail, every other mechanism to disincentivize crimes in the white house, it's not a speed limit that gets us to slow down when we're driving. it's the ticket in the mail. when we when we speed and this in my mind is crucial to ensure there's tickets in the mail for speeding for president. i mean, think about it. >> this is being manufactured by the court in res
that's in the plain language of the united states constitution richard nixon sen. was pardoned by gerald ford with the assumption that he could be prosecuted if that was not an assumption, why would there be a pardon in addition, mitch mcconnell, after the impeachment trial, stood on the senate floor and said, there, where procedurally i we're not going to convict because the justice system can hold this man accountable. the problem in this moment is if you look at donald trump, he, we've never...
0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 2
he is supposed to be faithful to the laws of the united states and constitution of the united states making a mistake is not what lands you in a criminal prosecution. >> what would happen if presidents were under fear, fear that their successors would criminally prosecute them for their acts in office? whether they are engaged in drone strikes, all of the hypotheticals. i'm not going to go through them. it seems to me like one of the incentives that might be created this for presidents to try to pardon themselves. do you have any thoughts about that? >> i didn't think about it until your honor asked it. that is one incident -- >> in response to yesterday's oral arguments, our next guest posted this. whatever the court does, having this case heard and the idea of immunity for a military coup being taken seriously and debated is a big victory in the information war that maga and allies wage. authoritarian specialize in normalizing extreme ideas and this involves giving them a respected platform. joining us now is ruth ben- ghiat, history professor at new york university, author of stro
he is supposed to be faithful to the laws of the united states and constitution of the united states making a mistake is not what lands you in a criminal prosecution. >> what would happen if presidents were under fear, fear that their successors would criminally prosecute them for their acts in office? whether they are engaged in drone strikes, all of the hypotheticals. i'm not going to go through them. it seems to me like one of the incentives that might be created this for presidents to...
0
0.0
Apr 19, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it is not part american in the united states is already protected by the constitution. there is nobody on this house for that would argue you do not need a warrant to look at americans data in the united states. this amendment and i encourage everyone to pick it up and read it, applies to the data we collect in spying on hamas, the commons chinese party to give them a warrant. to give them constitutional protections means they are open for business. the day after this passes and we go blind complete pass to recruit united states students to spy on our industry and universities. hamas and hezbollah have a complete pass will be blind as they were cute people for terrorist attack within the united states. currently we keep america safe by spying on our adversaries. with that i reserved. >> judgment from connecticut is recognized by. >> by. >> thank you mr. speaker i yield such time as it may consume pickwick to charmers recognized records i rise in support of this legislation. first let me emphasize again as the chairman said section 702 is our single most important intell
it is not part american in the united states is already protected by the constitution. there is nobody on this house for that would argue you do not need a warrant to look at americans data in the united states. this amendment and i encourage everyone to pick it up and read it, applies to the data we collect in spying on hamas, the commons chinese party to give them a warrant. to give them constitutional protections means they are open for business. the day after this passes and we go blind...
0
0.0
Apr 1, 2024
04/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you think that the constitution of the united states has to be amended in some way, or at least, the to interpret it in a way which will ensure that there is a federal ban on abortion. now, donald trump addressed this the other day. he said that he might be willing to back a is—week federal ban on abortion, but certainly not a total ban. and he also said there would have to be exceptions for rape, incest, life—threatening emergencies. and he explained his position by saying to his fellow republicans, "we have to win elections." now, given he takes that stand, are you telling me that you're no longer prepared to back people like donald trump? well, to be clear, again, i don't know what research you've done on this. i have not backed donald trump in the past. unfortunately, i don't think his position is the pro—life position. you know, certainly, he has done some pro—life things in his history, but...and he's certainly more pro—life than president biden. president biden is opposed to abortion restrictions at any point in pregnancy. he supports abortion through all nine months of pregna
you think that the constitution of the united states has to be amended in some way, or at least, the to interpret it in a way which will ensure that there is a federal ban on abortion. now, donald trump addressed this the other day. he said that he might be willing to back a is—week federal ban on abortion, but certainly not a total ban. and he also said there would have to be exceptions for rape, incest, life—threatening emergencies. and he explained his position by saying to his fellow...
0
0.0
Apr 16, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
right granted to americans under the fourth amendment to the united states constitution. the fourth amendment of the constitution protects our people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, and an unchecked surveillance authority would directly violate that right. that's why we have guardrails, that's why we have protections to minimize the chance of that happening. i know there's been some confusion. some of it is from a misunderstanding. some of it is people frankly just misrepresenting exactly what this authority does and does not do. but section 702 does not violate the fourth amendment. every court that has considered the lawfulness of the 702 program has found that it complies with the fourth amendment. so when people stand up and say, well, section 702 allows the government to spy on americans, that's frankly not true. if they say it violates the fourth amendment, well, you have at least three courts that have considered the issue and they've said, no, it doesn't. so they need to comet up with another -- they they need to -- so they need to come
right granted to americans under the fourth amendment to the united states constitution. the fourth amendment of the constitution protects our people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, and an unchecked surveillance authority would directly violate that right. that's why we have guardrails, that's why we have protections to minimize the chance of that happening. i know there's been some confusion. some of it is from a misunderstanding. some of it is people frankly just...
0
0.0
Apr 13, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
now inside the united states, everybody's communications are protect the constitution is sound. since the birth of this nation we have fought to ensure that. f the swamp to give the american people the protection they already have, protection of communications. they don't have protection to talk to hamas or china and that they'll be recruited to be a spy. there shouldn't be a warrant for those communications. we shouldn't be able to see them. our nation would be unsafe. i reserve. the chair: the gentleman's time has expired. the gentleman from arizona is recognized. mr. biggs: i yield a minute to the chairman of the committee, mr. jordan. the chair: the gentleman is recognized. mr. jordan: my good friend from ohio says we're searching foreigners in this database. if we're just searching foreigners, why do we have this distinction called u.s. person queries? if you're just searching the bad guys, that's one thing. we're not or you wouldn't have violated u.s. person queries 278,000 times. you can search all the bad guys you want. that's what we want. do surveillance. they're in th
now inside the united states, everybody's communications are protect the constitution is sound. since the birth of this nation we have fought to ensure that. f the swamp to give the american people the protection they already have, protection of communications. they don't have protection to talk to hamas or china and that they'll be recruited to be a spy. there shouldn't be a warrant for those communications. we shouldn't be able to see them. our nation would be unsafe. i reserve. the chair:...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i do solemnly swear, that i will support and defend, the counsitution of the united states, and the constitution of the state of california, against all enemies foreign and domestic. >> today i graduated from san francisco 130 recruit class, and i became a san francisco firefighter. i feel absolutely amazing. i thought about how i feel graduating, but feeling it is crazy. i'm so so excited to get started. i will be in station 9 in the bayview. industrial part of the city and i'm extremely excited to do everything the truck does. learn how to raise and lower the aerial. get to all the different ladders and practice them in real life and apply them to situations that we are seen in the academy, but to see them in real life will be a brand new thing. [applause] >> going up to the stage to get my badge, i was thinking about how sweaty my hands were. i was trying not to trip, and but in realty i was just thinking about how special the moment it was, and to be honest, it felt like everything stood still for a second, and it was a special time to reflect on the journey. i feel proud of my class mates m
i do solemnly swear, that i will support and defend, the counsitution of the united states, and the constitution of the state of california, against all enemies foreign and domestic. >> today i graduated from san francisco 130 recruit class, and i became a san francisco firefighter. i feel absolutely amazing. i thought about how i feel graduating, but feeling it is crazy. i'm so so excited to get started. i will be in station 9 in the bayview. industrial part of the city and i'm extremely...
0
0.0
Apr 12, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
states, the communist party will have full constitutional protections to recruit in the united statesnd there will be no increased protection of constitutional protections for americans and their data. the only data that would become protected is data that's located in al qaeda's in-box and the communist chinese in-box. how is it that they become protected? this amendment would require that you have to have a warrant to look into communist chinese party data for the recruitment efforts that they are doing within the united states. you would have to have evidence of a crime that is occurring in order to be able to get to that warrant. which means we'll be blind. the moment that this -- if this becomes law, we will be blind and we'll be unable to look at what hezbollah is doing in the united states, what hamas is doing in the united states, what the communist party is doing in the united states. there's no additional protections in this amendment for americans. americans still have full constitutional protection of their own data. let me give you an example of how this works under their
states, the communist party will have full constitutional protections to recruit in the united statesnd there will be no increased protection of constitutional protections for americans and their data. the only data that would become protected is data that's located in al qaeda's in-box and the communist chinese in-box. how is it that they become protected? this amendment would require that you have to have a warrant to look into communist chinese party data for the recruitment efforts that...
0
0.0
Apr 10, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the founders intentionally built into the united states constitution protections for us, protections for the people. unfortunately the legislation before us doesn't do what is necessary to answer the question. to secure the people's rights. there are amendments that are in order that might, that might get the legislation there. remember, section 702 allows the n.s.a. to surveil non-u.s. individuals and organizations abroad if a significant purpose is to acquire foreign intelligence information. which it defines as information related to the conduct of u.s. foreign affairs. remember, there are some 230,000 targets that the government has, the blob, the intelligence community has that they're targeting over there. overseas. targeting externally. but here's the problem. they're collecting information here in the united states on those individuals, we don't know who they are. i asked the judiciary committee chairman, staff, do you all know who they are? you have gone into a scif? you have seen who they're targeting and the sean no -- answer is no. we don't know who they're targeting. the
the founders intentionally built into the united states constitution protections for us, protections for the people. unfortunately the legislation before us doesn't do what is necessary to answer the question. to secure the people's rights. there are amendments that are in order that might, that might get the legislation there. remember, section 702 allows the n.s.a. to surveil non-u.s. individuals and organizations abroad if a significant purpose is to acquire foreign intelligence information....
0
0.0
Apr 11, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it's called the constitution of the united states. under the constitution it is the sole power of the house to impeach and the sole power and responsibility of the senate to try. 21 times in our nation's history, more than 200 years, the house has impeached an individual and sent the articles of impeachment. in one time the senate concluded it had in a jurisdiction because the person was a senator and it only attaches to members of the executive branch or judicial branch, they dismissed it because of lack of jurisdiction, in three of them, the individuals impeached because they were no longer in office. the senate didn't act because it was moot because the individual impeached was out of office. ? the remaining 17 times, all of them, 100% of the time the senate conducted a trial, the senate heard evidence, and the senate adjudicated guilt or innocence. each senator stood up and said guilty or not guilty. not week when the articles arrive, we are told that senator schumer intends not to proceed to a trial, not to allow any evidence but
it's called the constitution of the united states. under the constitution it is the sole power of the house to impeach and the sole power and responsibility of the senate to try. 21 times in our nation's history, more than 200 years, the house has impeached an individual and sent the articles of impeachment. in one time the senate concluded it had in a jurisdiction because the person was a senator and it only attaches to members of the executive branch or judicial branch, they dismissed it...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
he's supposed to be faithful to the laws of the united states and the constitution of the united states and making a mistake is not what lands you in a criminal prosecution. >> joyce, your thoughts about what he was dealing with on that bench, because as i mentioned, the emphasis on everything but now i found suspicious. the number of justices who want to talk about history and we're writing for the future and not deal with what he says there. you're never getting prosecuted for a good faith mistake. you have to have criminal intent. this is black letter law. here you're not fdr dealing with a war. you've got 20 days or whatever left, you have a president-elect lawfully certified and you're trying to steal the thing. >> so appellate argument is very different from arguing in front of a jury. you don't have to be splashy. no theatrics involved. michael dreeben more than any other speaks the supreme court's language. former deputy solicitor general. he's argued cases in front of the court for decades. michael dreeben went into this knowing he had a difficult path to walk. in fact, in the
he's supposed to be faithful to the laws of the united states and the constitution of the united states and making a mistake is not what lands you in a criminal prosecution. >> joyce, your thoughts about what he was dealing with on that bench, because as i mentioned, the emphasis on everything but now i found suspicious. the number of justices who want to talk about history and we're writing for the future and not deal with what he says there. you're never getting prosecuted for a good...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
united states. and making a mistake is not what lands you in a criminal prosecution. there has been some talk about the statutes that are issued in this case. i think they are fairly described as statutes engaging in conspiracies to defraud the united states with respect to one of the most important functions, namely the certification of the next president -- >> well, i don't want to dispute the particular application of that, of 371, conspiracy to defraud the united states, to the particular facts here, but would you not agree that is a peculiarly open ended statutory prohibition? and that fraud under that provision, unlike under most other fraud provisions, does not have to do -- doesn't require any impairment of a property interest? >> it is designed to protect the functions of the united states government and it is difficult to think of a more critical function than the certification of who won the election. >> you know, i'm not -- as i said, i'm not discussing the particular facts of this case,
united states. and making a mistake is not what lands you in a criminal prosecution. there has been some talk about the statutes that are issued in this case. i think they are fairly described as statutes engaging in conspiracies to defraud the united states with respect to one of the most important functions, namely the certification of the next president -- >> well, i don't want to dispute the particular application of that, of 371, conspiracy to defraud the united states, to the...
0
0.0
Apr 8, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
states constitution. when the articles of impeachment arrive, they have a job to do. to ignore the evidence before us is to betray the trust of those who sent us here. there's no doubt at this point that the invasion at the southern border has inflicted indescribable, incalculable, intolerable pain and suffering on far too many americans. we're obligated to figure out who's responsible and hold them accountable, beginning with secretary mayorkas. i urge each of my colleagues to oppose this shameless effort to sidestep our constitutional duty and by so doing subvert the constitutional order. thank you, madam president. i yield the floor. . mr. schumer: madam president. the presiding officer: the majority leader. mr. schumer: i ask unanimous consent that the senate proceed to legislative session, be in a beard of morning business with senators permitted to speak therein for up to ten minutes each. the presiding officer: without objection. mr. schumer: and madam president, a very short one tonight -- i ask u
states constitution. when the articles of impeachment arrive, they have a job to do. to ignore the evidence before us is to betray the trust of those who sent us here. there's no doubt at this point that the invasion at the southern border has inflicted indescribable, incalculable, intolerable pain and suffering on far too many americans. we're obligated to figure out who's responsible and hold them accountable, beginning with secretary mayorkas. i urge each of my colleagues to oppose this...
0
0.0
Apr 16, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
has violated the public trust, has violated his oath to the constitution of the united states. we look forward to laying out those facts. i trust this institution. i have great respect for this institution. great respect for the individual senators, respect for the constitution and i would only ask, we would only ask, as managers, that the senate show us the same respect by hearing those facts. by hearing that evidence and by respecting the american people that sent us to congress and behalf of whom we are here presenting these articles to the senate. thank you. with that, i would like to turn it over to congressman lee. >> the american people deserve to hear the facts and the evidence that led us to this day the american people deserve to hear the things that we and the committee on homeland security heard. the staggering statistics. the deliberate implementation of policies that led to this crisis they deserve to hear the impunity with which secretary mae arcus subverted the law. the existing federal law of the united states and the orders of federal courts directing him that
has violated the public trust, has violated his oath to the constitution of the united states. we look forward to laying out those facts. i trust this institution. i have great respect for this institution. great respect for the individual senators, respect for the constitution and i would only ask, we would only ask, as managers, that the senate show us the same respect by hearing those facts. by hearing that evidence and by respecting the american people that sent us to congress and behalf of...
0
0.0
Apr 2, 2024
04/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you think that the constitution of the united states has to be amended in some way, or at least, thedonald trump addressed this the other day. he said that he might be willing to back a is—week federal ban on abortion, but certainly not a total ban. and he also said there would have to be exceptions for rape, incest, life—threatening emergencies. and he explained his position by saying to his fellow republicans, "we have to win elections." now, given he takes that stand, are you telling me that you're no longer prepared to back people like donald trump? well, to be clear, again, i don't know what research you've done on this. i have not backed donald trump in the past. unfortunately, i don't think his position is the pro—life position. you know, certainly, he has done some pro—life things in his history, but...and he's certainly more pro—life than president biden. president biden is opposed to abortion restrictions, and at any point in pregnancy. he supports abortion through all nine months of pregnancy, for any reason. that is the democratic party platform, is taxpayer—funded suppor
you think that the constitution of the united states has to be amended in some way, or at least, thedonald trump addressed this the other day. he said that he might be willing to back a is—week federal ban on abortion, but certainly not a total ban. and he also said there would have to be exceptions for rape, incest, life—threatening emergencies. and he explained his position by saying to his fellow republicans, "we have to win elections." now, given he takes that stand, are you...
0
0.0
Apr 3, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
states constitution. it also serve as a warning that january 6 might just have been a preview how willing some of these veterans are to use their military training against the democracy they once promised to protect. let's watch. >> three, two, one -- >> there are places in our military where we are trained to start fuelling services. >> [ bleep ] they've been doing the whole career. now here in the united states. >> anybody who says this can't happen in a worse way, either their ignorant or they're part of the problem. >> today, domestic terrorism is a great threat facing the united states. >> the cia has this tool where they measure levels of insurgency, if you justify it any less, we're in insurgency. >> take it! >> how did i end up on one side of that door. and a fellow with arms ended up on the other side of that door? >> the last comment was someone you might recognize, congressman jason crowe, in the new documentary, against all enemies, former congressman denver riggleman of virginia who is the au
states constitution. it also serve as a warning that january 6 might just have been a preview how willing some of these veterans are to use their military training against the democracy they once promised to protect. let's watch. >> three, two, one -- >> there are places in our military where we are trained to start fuelling services. >> [ bleep ] they've been doing the whole career. now here in the united states. >> anybody who says this can't happen in a worse way,...
0
0.0
Apr 1, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
do and establish this constitution for the united states of america. the thing that i want you to see about this is it starts off with the people of the united states, not we, the people of new york. we the people of virginia or south carolina. they're trying to get to the one the one entity in struggling with that. because does that mean that if i'm in virginia, i have to lose myself in this new united states? can i maintain my culture, my character, and still be part of the united states? can you be a texan from texas? is still part of the u.s. that the issue? so this idea of, what is the relationship between those 13 states in this new federal government? they're still trying to they're trying to reconcile that. we're still trying to reconcile some of that today. the first three articles establishes the legislature, the executive and the judicial. that's why, as my checks and balances, that's my separation of powers. they knew that. okay. the president, the executive has a responsibility of executing law. the legislature will make the laws. the supr
do and establish this constitution for the united states of america. the thing that i want you to see about this is it starts off with the people of the united states, not we, the people of new york. we the people of virginia or south carolina. they're trying to get to the one the one entity in struggling with that. because does that mean that if i'm in virginia, i have to lose myself in this new united states? can i maintain my culture, my character, and still be part of the united states? can...
0
0.0
Apr 16, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
in the constitution of the united states. it also threatens our national security. and and has had a dire impact on communities across the country. we have been listening to your abdomen. mark green of tennessee, the chairman of the homeland security committee, as he is announcing the articles of impeachment against homeland security secretary alejandro mayorkas to the senate. mayorkas is being accused by house republicans of willfully and systemically refusing to comply with federal immigration law it does not seem at all likely that the senate is going to move forward with a conviction of the secretary just based on basic math of course, this is a historic moment though this is the first time that a sitting secretary in the cabinet has been impeached by congress since 150 years ago, back during the civil war era. we're going to keep an eye on what is happening on capitol hill and bring you the latest as we get it for now, let's turn over to jessica all right, boris, thanks so much. it is day two of jury selection. the presi
in the constitution of the united states. it also threatens our national security. and and has had a dire impact on communities across the country. we have been listening to your abdomen. mark green of tennessee, the chairman of the homeland security committee, as he is announcing the articles of impeachment against homeland security secretary alejandro mayorkas to the senate. mayorkas is being accused by house republicans of willfully and systemically refusing to comply with federal...
0
0.0
Apr 17, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
of the united states against all enemies, foreign and domestic. yet here we are three years later in the worst border crisis our nation has ever seen. i rise today because we find ourselves at a critical moment in our nation's history, a moment when the integrity of this very chamber and its leadership is being tested, a time when we will see if our colleagues across the aisle are willing to do the right thing and hold alejandro mayorkas accountable for his dereliction of duty that has left our country a shell of what she once was. now, with over 11 million border crossings, including 2 million unvetted got-aways now living here on united states soil, and monthing those are on un -- and the amongst those areal unknown number of terrorists, violent gang members and drug cartels, mayorkas has broken his oath resulting in this dangerous and deadly invasion of our country. all you have to do is read your hometown news. you're going to find a person in your community that is -- that has decide from fentanyl or been murdered by one of these illegal alie
of the united states against all enemies, foreign and domestic. yet here we are three years later in the worst border crisis our nation has ever seen. i rise today because we find ourselves at a critical moment in our nation's history, a moment when the integrity of this very chamber and its leadership is being tested, a time when we will see if our colleagues across the aisle are willing to do the right thing and hold alejandro mayorkas accountable for his dereliction of duty that has left our...
0
0.0
Apr 19, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
this bill provides constitutional protection to communicate people in the united states to recruit them for the purposes copy buys and doing espionage. the 9/11 perpetrators were in the united states mitigating with al qaeda. we made a grave mistake that we are not signed and we didn't see who they were communicating with in the united states. we changed the last and got to see the extent to which they were recruiting people to do us harm if this amendment passes, this will help will cause additional production to recruit in the united states and the communist party book coproductions and no increased production of constitutional protections for americans in their data. the only data that would be protected data located in al qaeda's inbox communist chinese. how is that they become protected? this would require you have to a warrant to look into communist chinese party data for the recruitment efforts they are doing in the united states. he would have to have evidence of a crime occurring to get that which means we will be wind but at the moment this becomes law, who will be blind and u
this bill provides constitutional protection to communicate people in the united states to recruit them for the purposes copy buys and doing espionage. the 9/11 perpetrators were in the united states mitigating with al qaeda. we made a grave mistake that we are not signed and we didn't see who they were communicating with in the united states. we changed the last and got to see the extent to which they were recruiting people to do us harm if this amendment passes, this will help will cause...
0
0.0
Apr 16, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
states on an annual basis with many unlawfully remaining in the united states.efusal to obey the law is not only against the separation of powers in the separation, constitution of the united states is also threatens our national security and has had a dire impact on communities across the country's. despite clear evidence his willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law has significantly contributed to unprecedented levels of illegal immigrants insurance the entering of the vertebrate drug cartels and the impositions of enormous costs on states and localities from the influx of aliens, alejandro n mayorkus has continued in his refusal to comply with the law and thereby acted to the grave detriment of the interest of the united states. alejandro n mayorkus engaged in this scheme or course of conduct through the following means. 1, alejandro n mayorkus willfully refused to comply with the detention mandate set forth in section 235b2 letter a in the nationality act requiring all who are "not clearly and beyond a doubt required to be admitted" shall be detai
states on an annual basis with many unlawfully remaining in the united states.efusal to obey the law is not only against the separation of powers in the separation, constitution of the united states is also threatens our national security and has had a dire impact on communities across the country's. despite clear evidence his willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law has significantly contributed to unprecedented levels of illegal immigrants insurance the entering of the vertebrate...
0
0.0
Apr 30, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
article 1, section 1 of the united states constitution makes it clear that congress writes the law, not the executive branch. in 1934 and 1976, congress passed the grazing act and public land act. both require multiple use policy on public lands. this rule is unconstitutional because it circumvents both laws congress passed to enforce an executive branch policy. when collecting limited public input on this rule, over a limited 75-kay period, the b.l.m. only allowed five public forums in exclusive -- and -- in exclusively urban city centers in. deliberate donalding of stake holders whose land they're attempting to commandeer show house litter this administration cared about their scathing disapproval in rural america. lastly this move irrep rahably impedes sustainable grazing practices in montana and devastates rural communities throughout the country by requiring ranchers to compete with coastal corporations for the limited number of available leases. i'm sick and tired of the american farmers who -- farmer who creates food security being trampled by radical environmentalists who think
article 1, section 1 of the united states constitution makes it clear that congress writes the law, not the executive branch. in 1934 and 1976, congress passed the grazing act and public land act. both require multiple use policy on public lands. this rule is unconstitutional because it circumvents both laws congress passed to enforce an executive branch policy. when collecting limited public input on this rule, over a limited 75-kay period, the b.l.m. only allowed five public forums in...
0
0.0
Apr 3, 2024
04/24
by
BELARUSTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
united states recognized that britain in the european union would recognize them as a president, andere, that is, if the west recognizes zelensky after may 21, then of course he will be the president, no one wants to care , if in the usa they call him the president of ukraine, then zelensky will be the president of ukraine, if they call someone else the president of ukraine, then the president. thank you, alexander, we talked with ukrainian political scientist and blogger alexander skupchenko. there has been a thunderstorm since the evening, today there is snow, hail, rain and gusty winds. the weather in belarus showed its winter character with hurricane winds and precipitation. over the past 24 hours, 256 settlements experienced problems with power supply. most of them have already been restored. as a result of the passage of the thunderstorm front, four settlements in the gomel and mogilev regions were damaged, with fallen trees, torn off roofs and even the collapse of part of the wall of a five-story building. emergency services promptly responded to all emergency situations and e
united states recognized that britain in the european union would recognize them as a president, andere, that is, if the west recognizes zelensky after may 21, then of course he will be the president, no one wants to care , if in the usa they call him the president of ukraine, then zelensky will be the president of ukraine, if they call someone else the president of ukraine, then the president. thank you, alexander, we talked with ukrainian political scientist and blogger alexander skupchenko....
0
0.0
Apr 18, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the fourth amendment to the united states constitution protects americans from unlawful searches and seizures. now that applies in every instance where there's an investigation, whether it's by the fbi or by the local police department. law enforcement cannot search your home or monitor your communications without going to a court and showing probable cause that a crime has been committed. but there's a lot of confusion about where that might apply in this context, because what we're talking about is not crime in the sense that we are, our criminal laws ordinarily apply in america. what we're talking about is foreign espionage and hostile activities directed towards the united states that have not yet occurred. ordinarily in america, we don't do anything to try to prevent crimes from happening. we punish crimes once they've occurred, after we've investigated them and prosecuted them. but we don't want another 9/11 to occur. we don't want innocent americans to be killed in a terrorist attack. and it's not okay to say, we'll wait until the terrorists commit that act, and then we'll try
the fourth amendment to the united states constitution protects americans from unlawful searches and seizures. now that applies in every instance where there's an investigation, whether it's by the fbi or by the local police department. law enforcement cannot search your home or monitor your communications without going to a court and showing probable cause that a crime has been committed. but there's a lot of confusion about where that might apply in this context, because what we're talking...
0
0.0
Apr 2, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
of the united states which is why decided to put the constitution and the god bless the usa bible. >sse: why do you think the media is trying to portray the millions of christians who support donald trump during this rally who potentially will by the bible, wire there being per trade being in a religious cult they are just christians? >> lee: is hardly a cult is and it with there are a million transgender's in the united states and 2 million christians registered its were talking too much about that subject and i want to talk more about faith and to tell you the truth we were here at our church and somebody said where aren't people coming back to church? to tie the truth, we had two services on saturday and three on sunday and my whole family was there and it was a beautiful day to celebrate easter and i think president trump are acknowledging that. >> jesse: i was a easter service with my family and left after communion because the kids were getting a little crazy and hopefully that's okay. >> lee: it's okay. >> jesse: thank you very muchly and happy easter. >> lee: god bless the us
of the united states which is why decided to put the constitution and the god bless the usa bible. >sse: why do you think the media is trying to portray the millions of christians who support donald trump during this rally who potentially will by the bible, wire there being per trade being in a religious cult they are just christians? >> lee: is hardly a cult is and it with there are a million transgender's in the united states and 2 million christians registered its were talking too...
0
0.0
Apr 29, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> and this is probably why i get it in the united states, the federal constitution does not make a reference to god as such although it uses the form hello, the year of our lord, which is capitalize in article seven. there's only one lord capitalised l0 or do well, there is a reference to god in our constitution and in our bill of rights, certainly an article seven and article seven do read it one, such states the days one reference is enough it refers to the year of the lord, capital l, or there's only one lord religion has always played a role in american politics pope pius, the 12th said, into the hands of america god, has placed and afflicted mankind or may ready three but what's happening now is different jason, we just talked your due to place right now. he's democrat. i don't mean mulch around this church, didn't get out get out, you demon get out your baby butchering election thief you cannot be pushing invoked, give a cloudiness nike, we are going to have one nation under god and one religion under god. i'm tired of this separation of church and state junk. >> it has a nam
. >> and this is probably why i get it in the united states, the federal constitution does not make a reference to god as such although it uses the form hello, the year of our lord, which is capitalize in article seven. there's only one lord capitalised l0 or do well, there is a reference to god in our constitution and in our bill of rights, certainly an article seven and article seven do read it one, such states the days one reference is enough it refers to the year of the lord, capital...
0
0.0
Apr 10, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it's called the constitution of the united states. under the constitution it is the sole power of the house to impeach and the sole power and responsibility of the senate to try. 21 times in our nation's history, more than 200 years, the house has impeached an individual and sent the articles of impeachment. in one time the senate concluded it had in a jurisdiction because the person was a senator and it only attaches to members of the executive branch or judicial branch, they dismissed it because of lack of jurisdiction, in three of them, the individuals impeached because they were no longer in office. the senate didn't act because it was moot because the individual impeached was out of office. ? the remaining 17 times, all of them, 100% of the time the senate conducted a trial, the senate heard evidence, and the senate adjudicated guilt or innocence. each senator stood up and said guilty or not guilty. not week when the articles arrive, we are told that senator schumer intends not to proceed to a trial, not to allow any evidence but
it's called the constitution of the united states. under the constitution it is the sole power of the house to impeach and the sole power and responsibility of the senate to try. 21 times in our nation's history, more than 200 years, the house has impeached an individual and sent the articles of impeachment. in one time the senate concluded it had in a jurisdiction because the person was a senator and it only attaches to members of the executive branch or judicial branch, they dismissed it...
0
0.0
Apr 15, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
of the united states and supported as being part of the constitution of the united states. we have the american people on our side. it is urgent that we get this done. it has been over 100 years that we have been, not me personally, but we been fighting to get this as part of the constitution with ratification of the women's rights to vote. 104 years ago we've been working on this issue ever since. we have to complete the job. it is urgent today. because we have runaway courts. we have runaway courts that are coming up with absurd interpretations of our constitution. we need a stricter interpretation as it relates to the rights, the equal rights amendment. yes, the dobbs decision puts a big spotlight on this. but we are seeing other decisions that are eroding the right spirit i never thought that i would see this. the dobbs decision he raised rights that were embedded for 48 years. giving women the right to control their own destiny. their own health care decisions. but we have equal concern about what these rights will be for pregnant women. what their rights will be for v
of the united states and supported as being part of the constitution of the united states. we have the american people on our side. it is urgent that we get this done. it has been over 100 years that we have been, not me personally, but we been fighting to get this as part of the constitution with ratification of the women's rights to vote. 104 years ago we've been working on this issue ever since. we have to complete the job. it is urgent today. because we have runaway courts. we have runaway...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
here, of course is guaranteed by the constitution of the united states. it, it isn't up in the air as anybody who comes who's here. they have to abide by the rules and regulations. that's why we have a constitution and nobody's above is off. the web is different. and so if a person come from another state or another country while they in the us, they have to abide by the rules of the us. they also all of for the, the, the, the plus is as well as demands they have to abide by the law. but then they also have to be given the same rights and privileges that every other person that lives in america lives. so whether they are from a venice, a whale, or south america doesn't make any difference west in america, then they are here under the rules and regulations of america as well. good and bad privileges and the disadvantages or matthew, i'm going to bring you in because you come at this from a federal law enforcement level being i'm, i'm with us, marshall and not necessarily eyes, but do you think that it's a local law enforcement should be able to work togeth
here, of course is guaranteed by the constitution of the united states. it, it isn't up in the air as anybody who comes who's here. they have to abide by the rules and regulations. that's why we have a constitution and nobody's above is off. the web is different. and so if a person come from another state or another country while they in the us, they have to abide by the rules of the us. they also all of for the, the, the, the plus is as well as demands they have to abide by the law. but then...