beforehand, if you were winning a bet about which justices would bring up the comstock act, it would be aledo and thomas, and that was my takeaways. >> first of all, just by way of disclosure, i am against this lawsuit to stop women from being able to have mifepristone. my partner just argued the case, and i thought the oral argument went really poorly for the challengers for the drug. sometimes it's hard to tell after an oral argument who is going to win, and anything can happen and i have seen that, but this one did not appear close. the backdrop to the argument is it's the first supreme court argument since they overturned roe v. wade and the dobbs decision roughly two years ago, and now abortion is up to the individual states and this drug is being used in every state to try and give women some measure of reproductive justice. there were two issues in the case, and one sounds technical, but it's important, and it's the doctrine of legal standing, who can come into the court to challenge a government action. the other was the merits as how the drug and the fda expanded its access, and is t