0
0.0
Feb 3, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and darrow is going to argue back. the state has a right to say what's taught in schools within reason. and he says evolution has been taught in tennessee for years. and then along come legislatures who say science interferes of their religious beliefs. so you can't teach it anymore. and he's going to say, don't copy this down. just let me read you some quotes from some of bryan darrow's oration. this law makes the bible the yardstick to measure every man's intellect, to measure every man's learning. he says scopes isn't on trial. civilization is on trial. the prosecution is opening the doors for a reign of bigotry equal to anything in the middle ages, where law brought us this law brought us back to the 16th century, when bigots burned men who dared to bring any intelligence and enlightenment and culture to the human mind. the state of tennessee has no right to teach. the bible is the divine book. then, then that the koran is one or the book of mormon, or the book of confucius or the essays of emerson. and he specific
and darrow is going to argue back. the state has a right to say what's taught in schools within reason. and he says evolution has been taught in tennessee for years. and then along come legislatures who say science interferes of their religious beliefs. so you can't teach it anymore. and he's going to say, don't copy this down. just let me read you some quotes from some of bryan darrow's oration. this law makes the bible the yardstick to measure every man's intellect, to measure every man's...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the only one who has argued in front of his court. >> his sixth time arguing. interesting to see his comfort level in contrast to the other attorneys arguing. he clerked for justice scalia. he had a website devoted to him called the scalia shrine. he has written a lot of scholarly articles. murphy, clerked for both justice kagan and gorsuch and murray wrote an op yet in 2017 are you in for the confirmation of justice gorsuch? both of his bosses could not be more different politically they're both driven by the law and not partisan politics. interesting to see his interactions with those justices today. >> bill: this is a verbal machine gun. the lawyers start and start to make their case and they get redirected by any one of the justices. >> absolutely. so i do think that one who has argued before the supreme court before there is a certain level of comfort that has been developed. all three attorneys know the stakes are so high and i'm sure they're all nervous. >> dana: one of the things democrats counted on is all these lawsuits charges against president trump
the only one who has argued in front of his court. >> his sixth time arguing. interesting to see his comfort level in contrast to the other attorneys arguing. he clerked for justice scalia. he had a website devoted to him called the scalia shrine. he has written a lot of scholarly articles. murphy, clerked for both justice kagan and gorsuch and murray wrote an op yet in 2017 are you in for the confirmation of justice gorsuch? both of his bosses could not be more different politically...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
this was your first time arguing before the supreme court.ou were in front two justices you clerked for. what was the whole experience like? >> it's always an amazing experience to be up before a court, especially the u.s. supreme court. there's a certain sense of price arguing in front of my former bosses. it was certainly intense. i didn't expect them to pull any punches on a case of this magnitude. certainly they didn't, but we never expected the court would be willing to do a hard thing like this without asking really hard questions. >> they did ask hard questions. we were playing some of questions from the justices who expressed skepticism at the arguments that you were making to uphold the colorado supreme court ruling. here is some of what they said.
this was your first time arguing before the supreme court.ou were in front two justices you clerked for. what was the whole experience like? >> it's always an amazing experience to be up before a court, especially the u.s. supreme court. there's a certain sense of price arguing in front of my former bosses. it was certainly intense. i didn't expect them to pull any punches on a case of this magnitude. certainly they didn't, but we never expected the court would be willing to do a hard...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
will that be debated and argued in front of the justices?>> that's going to be fascinating to see how much discussion there is about what happened on january 6th and donald trump's role. i would imagine many justices may avoid that, but welcome to law. that raises the issue of what is engagement, what is insurrection, what is to aid or comfort. >> abet was another word they used. >> all of those are legal issues for the supreme court. >> does it matter that he was never indicted by jack smith for insurrection? >> so the colorado people defending that say, no, it doesn't say that you have to be indicted. there has to be a finding. the issue is what's the standard of proof for that finding. the trump side said, yes, it should require a criminal conviction. that will be one of the battlegrounds we're going to see. >> the other one is the question, neal, who's supposed to enforce section 3 of the 14th amendment? is it up to congress? is it up to the courts? >> yeah, so the technical language here is whether the 14th amendment is self-executing -
will that be debated and argued in front of the justices?>> that's going to be fascinating to see how much discussion there is about what happened on january 6th and donald trump's role. i would imagine many justices may avoid that, but welcome to law. that raises the issue of what is engagement, what is insurrection, what is to aid or comfort. >> abet was another word they used. >> all of those are legal issues for the supreme court. >> does it matter that he was never...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
he was arguing they ma be a president? he was arguing they may be a chilling _ president? - president? he was arguing they may be a chilling effect. the - may be a chilling effect. the president should be free to act without concern but what the court says is that is not what people have been doing, people have thought about the legality of their actions. for example, president nixon when he left office after watergate got a pardon and because everyone thought he could be prosecuted which meant throughout american history people have been operating under the expectation that i go too far, i could be prosecuted. they brought up other examples like members of congress, who have been prosecuted in the us for actions that relate to their duties. they brought up federal judges for example, they even prosecuted book doing illegal actions and all these important jobs, legislating the judiciary, they operate without concern of a chilling effect. they know there are limitations to their power but that's required limitation because we are a country of laws. you described _ are a cou
he was arguing they ma be a president? he was arguing they may be a chilling _ president? - president? he was arguing they may be a chilling effect. the - may be a chilling effect. the president should be free to act without concern but what the court says is that is not what people have been doing, people have thought about the legality of their actions. for example, president nixon when he left office after watergate got a pardon and because everyone thought he could be prosecuted which meant...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
really briefly, because they will all argue pragmatism, getting it out of the way... will all argue pragmatismfore the bud . et it out of the way... even before the budget coming _ it out of the way... even before the budget coming up. _ it out of the way... even before the budget coming up, but _ it out of the way... even before the budget coming up, but does - it out of the way... even before the budget coming up, but does it - budget coming up, but does it suggest to you a timidity still even so far ahead suggest to you a timidity still even so farahead in suggest to you a timidity still even so far ahead in the polls? the auestion so far ahead in the polls? the question is — so far ahead in the polls? the question is what _ so far ahead in the polls? the question is what is _ so far ahead in the polls? iie: question is what is pragmatic? because i would argue that to be pragmatic, sometimes to be distinctive and stick to a line and appear to be standing firm is the pragmatic course. and conceding ground is the risky course, but these are tough calls because this tax and spend debate before
really briefly, because they will all argue pragmatism, getting it out of the way... will all argue pragmatismfore the bud . et it out of the way... even before the budget coming _ it out of the way... even before the budget coming up. _ it out of the way... even before the budget coming up, but _ it out of the way... even before the budget coming up, but does - it out of the way... even before the budget coming up, but does it - budget coming up, but does it suggest to you a timidity still...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i think it argues to put him out more, not less. i think the more people see him, the more they hear him describing what it is he is doing, what the goals he is trying to achieve, the more they see him interacting with people, out on the campaign trail, as the campaign heats. obviously, some of his best moments are when he is talking one-on-one, or in small groups with people, we are he shows an incredible amount of empathy and understanding for their lives. so, i think the more he's out, they have the better. it also reduces the amount of focus on every individual misspeak. again, people who, essentially speak publicly for a living, of course they're going to misspeak from time to time. so, the more he is out showcasing what he is fighting for, what he's achieved, and again, that contrast with donald trump, this conversation we sort of lost a little bit somehow the biggest news from this report today, which was the special counsel talking about the very clear differences between the way donald trump essentially obstructed the inves
i think it argues to put him out more, not less. i think the more people see him, the more they hear him describing what it is he is doing, what the goals he is trying to achieve, the more they see him interacting with people, out on the campaign trail, as the campaign heats. obviously, some of his best moments are when he is talking one-on-one, or in small groups with people, we are he shows an incredible amount of empathy and understanding for their lives. so, i think the more he's out, they...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the attorneys argue about the nation's highest court. special coverage begins in less than an hour. >>> we have breaking news on a story we have been talking about, the marines missing after a military helicopter crashed in a forest in southern california white on a flight from nevada. let's go to natasha bertrand. what are we learning? >> reporter: sad news from the marine corps. these five marines who were traveling in that ch-53 from nevada to california on february 6th, that helicopter crashed. they have been confirmed dead by the marines. this is the statement they released. ta the families of our fallen marines, we send our deepest condolences and commit to ensuring your support and care during this incredibly difficult time. this search and rescue operation had been hampered by very difficult weather conditions, according to sources who spoke to us yesterday. ultimately, they were able to reach the crash site. they found the helicopter in cleveland national forest, just outside of san diego. ultimately, they did find those five ma
the attorneys argue about the nation's highest court. special coverage begins in less than an hour. >>> we have breaking news on a story we have been talking about, the marines missing after a military helicopter crashed in a forest in southern california white on a flight from nevada. let's go to natasha bertrand. what are we learning? >> reporter: sad news from the marine corps. these five marines who were traveling in that ch-53 from nevada to california on february 6th, that...
0
0.0
Feb 23, 2024
02/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it could be argued that the appeal. ms begum's case was harsh, it could also be argued that ms begum is the author of her own misfortune, but it is not for this court to agree or disagree with either point of view. our only task is to assess whether the deprivation decision was unlawful. we have concluded it was not, and the appeal is dismissed. mrjames matthew, you will want time to consider the written decision in full. our proposal subject to anything you would like to say is that we will adjourn consequential matters for a period of seven days. we will direct that the parties should agree a draft order within that period and, failing such agreement, to submit short submissions to the court by 4pm next friday, that is why they 1st of march, 2024. it is difficult for you to comment because you haven't seen the judgment but does that sound like a realistic time for you? and if you need more time then please communicate with the court in the normal way, subject to that, we conclude with a repeat of our thanks to all cou
it could be argued that the appeal. ms begum's case was harsh, it could also be argued that ms begum is the author of her own misfortune, but it is not for this court to agree or disagree with either point of view. our only task is to assess whether the deprivation decision was unlawful. we have concluded it was not, and the appeal is dismissed. mrjames matthew, you will want time to consider the written decision in full. our proposal subject to anything you would like to say is that we will...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and espionage charges was another chance to argue his case and bring the i'm here until in berlin. thank you very much for joining us. we started in the south of the gaza strip, over a 1000000 palestinians are displaced and struggling to access even the basic needs for survival in the city of roof. one of the biggest concerns is a lack of water. the lack of it is helping the spread of disease and so far there's no sign of relief. a frantic daily routine in russia, searching the water by somebody because my son is small and needs walter. i bring him see was there, but he refuses it. were unable to wash, we don't have clean clothes. there's no water, there's no food through since the world has varied. but this situation here is dire . we need water to live with that water. there is no life in the long line forms every day on this beach around one and a half 1000000 people are now believes to be crammed into the southern guns and say to you of rafa resident say the lack of clean water and food is causing disease to spread this about while your thoughts are not going to be sending you
and espionage charges was another chance to argue his case and bring the i'm here until in berlin. thank you very much for joining us. we started in the south of the gaza strip, over a 1000000 palestinians are displaced and struggling to access even the basic needs for survival in the city of roof. one of the biggest concerns is a lack of water. the lack of it is helping the spread of disease and so far there's no sign of relief. a frantic daily routine in russia, searching the water by...
0
0.0
Feb 23, 2024
02/24
by
ALJAZ
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it could be argued that the decision, a mistake in this case was cause it could also be argued that mistaken is the olsa of a misfortune. but it is not for this quote to agree or disagree with the point of view only task is to assess whether the deprivation decision was i know for as we have concluded, it was no. and the appeal is dismissed. when she arrived in serious, you mean that they got married and i saw fights. so she had 3 children, all of whom died from malnutrition and disease. she was found in 2019 by british journalist for the times do state, but at that point, she was still endorsing her decision endorsing i. so she later started referring to as a desktops who changed her mind to redress. she argued that she had the right to have her citizenship restored it as being a 5 year legal guy. so just to get to this point, she says that she is prepared to go to jail. if she is restored citizenship and allowed to come back to the united kingdom, legal team say they will fights on. they haven't yet committed to appeal at the supreme court. they say 1st, they need to read the full judgemen
it could be argued that the decision, a mistake in this case was cause it could also be argued that mistaken is the olsa of a misfortune. but it is not for this quote to agree or disagree with the point of view only task is to assess whether the deprivation decision was i know for as we have concluded, it was no. and the appeal is dismissed. when she arrived in serious, you mean that they got married and i saw fights. so she had 3 children, all of whom died from malnutrition and disease. she...
0
0.0
Feb 14, 2024
02/24
by
GBN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i'm not arguing with lawyers. no, but who's >> thank you. i'm not arguing with lethisrs. i'm not arguing with lethis guidance. but ilhlss >> thank you. i'm not arguing wifrom:his guidance. but ilhlss >> thank you. i'm not arguing wifrom the guidance. but ilhlss >> thank you. i'm not arguing wifrom the governmentjt ilhlss >> thank you. i'm not arguing wifrom the government isn'tiss is from the government isn't it. which labour which is why a labour government, police. where government, the police. where is it? it? say it? where do we find it? say look, you need to change law it? where do we find it? say locthat>u need to change law it? where do we find it? say locthat youzed to change law it? where do we find it? say locthat you have» change law it? where do we find it? say locthat you have a hange law it? where do we find it? say locthat you have a specific law so that you have a specific offence assaulting a shop so that you have a specific offencein assaulting a shop so that you have a specific offencein the ;aulting a shop so that you have a specific offencein the same
i'm not arguing with lawyers. no, but who's >> thank you. i'm not arguing with lethisrs. i'm not arguing with lethis guidance. but ilhlss >> thank you. i'm not arguing wifrom:his guidance. but ilhlss >> thank you. i'm not arguing wifrom the guidance. but ilhlss >> thank you. i'm not arguing wifrom the governmentjt ilhlss >> thank you. i'm not arguing wifrom the government isn'tiss is from the government isn't it. which labour which is why a labour government,...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
las vegas for many would argue it is — in. las vegas for many would argue it is the _ in.in. las vegas for many would argue it is the home of the i argue it is the home of the billboard. you're confronted with them every second, it would seem.— with them every second, it would seem. , ., would seem. took us through the opportunity- _ would seem. took us through the opportunity. exactly, _ opportunity. exactly, innovation is on full display because as advertising platforms go there is nothing more adequate than the street. the stratosphere is incredible inside and out so bringing in sd, inside and out so bringing in 3d, anamorphic 3d and their brains out. we have seen pepsi and also doritos really trying to stand out and make that noise outside of that hefty pricetag of a commercial slot. and it really is the wow factor, it has to take your breath away. it factor, it has to take your breath away.— factor, it has to take your breath away. it does. if you have sent _ breath away. it does. if you have sent on _ breath away. it does. if you have sent on the _ breath away. it do
las vegas for many would argue it is — in. las vegas for many would argue it is the _ in.in. las vegas for many would argue it is the home of the i argue it is the home of the billboard. you're confronted with them every second, it would seem.— with them every second, it would seem. , ., would seem. took us through the opportunity- _ would seem. took us through the opportunity. exactly, _ opportunity. exactly, innovation is on full display because as advertising platforms go there is...
0
0.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that's what i would argue and i think you could say thati argue and i think you could say that they aree actually burning binding, our money because all of this is being subsidised by the energy bill payers. so british households paying around 2 million a day for the system to work. which is quite something when there are these alternatives that we have which are much cheaper, in particular, wind. the uk is blessed with incredible wind resource, much beyond what we need for our energy requirements. so the choice is quite simple in moving towards that cheaper and more efficient technology. john kerry clearly thinks _ efficient technology. john kerry clearly thinks it _ efficient technology. john kerry clearly thinks it is _ efficient technology. john kerry clearly thinks it is not _ efficient technology. john kerry clearly thinks it is not a - clearly thinks it is not a worthwhile investment, the british government does and in fact they put £6 billion of subsidy into it. am i right in saying that there is a budget decision to be made at the next week about whether more subsidies are sent
that's what i would argue and i think you could say thati argue and i think you could say that they aree actually burning binding, our money because all of this is being subsidised by the energy bill payers. so british households paying around 2 million a day for the system to work. which is quite something when there are these alternatives that we have which are much cheaper, in particular, wind. the uk is blessed with incredible wind resource, much beyond what we need for our energy...
0
0.0
Feb 26, 2024
02/24
by
ALJAZ
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
because as dr was argued, this is not just a temporary occupation. this is an expiration, this is a good russians and illegal use of force. and hence, once the court comes up with it's non biting opinion, brittany, and i think it would have huge symbolic influence. echo around the world where fix something like like the it'll be a new and you from something that has that gave, is there a favorite of a trait status? it was a have to start the recall said that i knew such agreements with these are those who are, is there a lot that you can, that us are going to have to be forced to start facing some questions about that and a thank you so much melanie, we really appreciate it as well as mailing the shot with a full us. i took out. let's go to gaza now. it is ready. shelves and sniffle, bullets have winded several palestinians as they waited for the aid of doctors and l. sheila hospital treating the injured on the floor. is there any troops tags and crowds waiting for i into never see around a 1000 gallons a city and then southern gaza to fishermen have
because as dr was argued, this is not just a temporary occupation. this is an expiration, this is a good russians and illegal use of force. and hence, once the court comes up with it's non biting opinion, brittany, and i think it would have huge symbolic influence. echo around the world where fix something like like the it'll be a new and you from something that has that gave, is there a favorite of a trait status? it was a have to start the recall said that i knew such agreements with these...
0
0.0
Feb 22, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
than persuade somebody we've learned this very junior high school like tactic, which, by the way, i argue that it does in some ways come from junior high school, but i can get on that later to just scare people out of disagreeing with you or ruin their lives if they do. and the third part is us beginning the process of trying to find a way out of this madness and trying to really make people understand that cancel culture isn't just about the you know, the more than a thousand professors who have been targeted for example. it's about what it does to trust and expertise because if you see that, for example, carol hoover at harvard, who was started to be forced out by initially by a dea administrator for going on fox news to talk about her book. and she said she made the point that we should be kind transgender people, we should be we should use their pronouns. but as the author of a book on testosterone in evolutionary biologist, we have to recognize that biological sex is real and it matters scientifically. and that led to a whole campaign against her at harvard. now. and she she got extr
than persuade somebody we've learned this very junior high school like tactic, which, by the way, i argue that it does in some ways come from junior high school, but i can get on that later to just scare people out of disagreeing with you or ruin their lives if they do. and the third part is us beginning the process of trying to find a way out of this madness and trying to really make people understand that cancel culture isn't just about the you know, the more than a thousand professors who...
0
0.0
Feb 2, 2024
02/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
yes, we heard from the prosecution arguing _ hearing.secution arguing for factors l hearing. yes, we heard from the i prosecution arguing for factors that they think were aggravating factors in this case. they talked about things like the transfer of text messages that were exchanged between the two in this case. they talked about the sheer level of violence that was inflicted on brianna ghey as part of the case and the premeditated nature and the two of them are discussed in advance how they would carry this out. we then heard the mitigation of defence. the lawyer effectively argued that he was being orchestrated byjenkinson and jenkinson was really the driving force behind this merger. he said ratcliffe had started the motor but thenjenkinson had taken over and carried on stabbing her and did not want to be part of it but there was because ofjenkinson. jenkinson's lawyer effectively conceded a lot of the points of the violent nature of the points of the violent nature of the attack and the horror that had caused but said she had been d
yes, we heard from the prosecution arguing _ hearing.secution arguing for factors l hearing. yes, we heard from the i prosecution arguing for factors that they think were aggravating factors in this case. they talked about things like the transfer of text messages that were exchanged between the two in this case. they talked about the sheer level of violence that was inflicted on brianna ghey as part of the case and the premeditated nature and the two of them are discussed in advance how they...
0
0.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
special counsel has argued all along it's a matter of national importance.should know whether there's going to be a conviction in this case before this man's name appears on the ballot if he indeed is the g.o.p. nominee as it looks like it will be. even if we get this decision last week of june, it fits one of the biggies that we get at the end of the term, i think the trump team is going to argue we have pretrial motions. discovery. that puts us through july, august, maybe september before would even be ready to argue this case. early fall is very conceivable for this. >> jesse: he could also get a favorable ruling by the high court. judge jeanine. >> judge jeanine: shannon, we are beginning from square one, assuming the supreme court says there is no immunity here and the trial goes for it. there've been no pretrial motions made at all in the d.c. case? >> that have been some things going on. there have been discovery. remember, if you remember a couple months ago the government actually tried to produce some of the documents to the trump team while this t
special counsel has argued all along it's a matter of national importance.should know whether there's going to be a conviction in this case before this man's name appears on the ballot if he indeed is the g.o.p. nominee as it looks like it will be. even if we get this decision last week of june, it fits one of the biggies that we get at the end of the term, i think the trump team is going to argue we have pretrial motions. discovery. that puts us through july, august, maybe september before...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i think it argues to put him out more. not less. i think the more people see him, the more they hear him describing what it is he's doing. the goals he's trying to achieve. the more they see him interacting with people out on the campaign trail, the campaign heats up. some of his best moments is when he is talking one-on-one or in small groups with people. he shows an incredible. a empathy and understanding for their livesful i think the more he's out there, the better. it also reduces the focus on every individual misspeak. people who essentially speak publicly for a living. of course, they're going to mrs. speak from time to time. so the more he's out show casing what he's fighting for, what he's achieved, and again, that contrast with donald trump. we sort of, in this conversation, we've lost a little bit, the biggest news from this report today which was the special counsel talking about the very clear differences between the way donald trump essentially obstructed the investigation into his own handling classified documents, an
i think it argues to put him out more. not less. i think the more people see him, the more they hear him describing what it is he's doing. the goals he's trying to achieve. the more they see him interacting with people out on the campaign trail, the campaign heats up. some of his best moments is when he is talking one-on-one or in small groups with people. he shows an incredible. a empathy and understanding for their livesful i think the more he's out there, the better. it also reduces the...
0
0.0
Feb 2, 2024
02/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so, the prosecution kc was arguing the fact is that they - was arguing the fact is that they think therens with scarlett over the planned merger of brianna ghey. they also talked about the level of violence that was used against brianna ghey and the premeditation of the crime, all being fact is that they think should be taken into account in terms of a stiffer sentence for these two teenagers. we have now gone onto the mitigation in terms of the defence counsel, richard pratt kc is addressing the court, the defence counsel for scarlettjenkinson. he has referred to the fact that scarlett confessing to the fact that scarlett confessing to a psychiatrist after conviction that she had been involved in stabbing brianna ghey, said that there had been several versions of what she said at different times and her instructions today were to say something different to what she said to the psychiatrist. he said, nothing that he could say would even put the smallest weight it's a very moving tester me we have heard and that he wouldn't attempt to do so. —— testimony. thejudge that he wouldn't attempt
so, the prosecution kc was arguing the fact is that they - was arguing the fact is that they think therens with scarlett over the planned merger of brianna ghey. they also talked about the level of violence that was used against brianna ghey and the premeditation of the crime, all being fact is that they think should be taken into account in terms of a stiffer sentence for these two teenagers. we have now gone onto the mitigation in terms of the defence counsel, richard pratt kc is addressing...
0
0.0
Feb 20, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
some would argue the supplemental can be put on top of it. just to view the timeframe i think it's parts. the source or too serious and you are right, the ukrainians are given five rounds of ammunition and they have to come home. one important point about this whole, ukraine aid is that 80% of it goes into refurbish our weapons stockpile, is going into our defense industrial base. i argued to mcconnell why don't you put this in us a weapons account? i told the white house that too. they said they thought it would look gimmicky but 80% is going into our defense database. with the whole package and the indo pacific, 60% is going into our defense industrial base. it's important for americans to know this. it's not going into some slush fund in ukraine. we have a special investigator, all of that is in place right now. on the loan aspect, i talked to cornyn. i don't think we will loan our self weapons but it does work with direct government assistance and this is been the thing that people are hung up on. in the senate supplemental there is prohi
some would argue the supplemental can be put on top of it. just to view the timeframe i think it's parts. the source or too serious and you are right, the ukrainians are given five rounds of ammunition and they have to come home. one important point about this whole, ukraine aid is that 80% of it goes into refurbish our weapons stockpile, is going into our defense industrial base. i argued to mcconnell why don't you put this in us a weapons account? i told the white house that too. they said...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the only choice to argue this case. >> thank you very much, sean. i appreciate your time. we will all be watching tomorrow. >> thank you. >>> david axlerod is here with me now. you hear sean laying this out. they're calm, they're confident but i know you warned this case could tear the country apart. those are the exact words you used. you don't use them lightly. why do you say that? >> first of all, let me preface this saying it is stunning three years after president trump left the capitol in disgrace having sold this lie of the election having been stolen from him, inciting a riot, that he is in the position he's in and we're in the position we're in. i'm not here as an apologist for donald trump and i'm certainly not here as a lawyer, but i'm sure that one of the things the supreme court has to consider is what is the impacts of a decision like that? you know, there are a myriad legal questions that we want to consider tomorrow. some will undoubtedly offer off ramps if they want an off ramp but i'm trying to imagine what it would be like if the
the only choice to argue this case. >> thank you very much, sean. i appreciate your time. we will all be watching tomorrow. >> thank you. >>> david axlerod is here with me now. you hear sean laying this out. they're calm, they're confident but i know you warned this case could tear the country apart. those are the exact words you used. you don't use them lightly. why do you say that? >> first of all, let me preface this saying it is stunning three years after...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
CNBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i would not argue with that. it's getting a little bit extreme but if that is your biggest quibble, that they are going up too fast and all of these are terrible companies or earnings are falling apart, if that is your biggest quibble, then do yourself a favor. take something off. trim something. sell your least favorite stock. i did that yesterday. it is okay. you can stick around and not be taking the biggest risk. >> we were literally less than 1/10 of a point away from s&p 5000. >> that i jinx it? >> let's just keep that up as we have this conversation. >> somebody buy apple, please. >> the trimming of the big winners you said you are doing it. obviously nvidia, but you took 20% off the top of and that stock is now about to hit $700. a target of 700 last week from goldman. north of 700 today from morgan stanley. >> so, the s&p 500 compounding at about 12.5%, the stock is been compounding at 69%. mathematically if you never sell any, it becomes your entire portfolio. there are very few stocks that have kept pa
i would not argue with that. it's getting a little bit extreme but if that is your biggest quibble, that they are going up too fast and all of these are terrible companies or earnings are falling apart, if that is your biggest quibble, then do yourself a favor. take something off. trim something. sell your least favorite stock. i did that yesterday. it is okay. you can stick around and not be taking the biggest risk. >> we were literally less than 1/10 of a point away from s&p 5000....
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
campaigners argue that the render support them.s _ support them. campaigners argue that the gender gap has held _ support them. campaigners argue that the gender gap has held women's - the gender gap has held women's sport back. here is how to address it. . ., ., ~ sport back. here is how to address it. ~ ., ., ~ ., , sport back. here is how to address it. what i would like to see is fundinu. it. what i would like to see is funding- l— it. what i would like to see is funding. i want _ it. what i would like to see is funding. i want to _ it. what i would like to see is funding. i want to see - it. what i would like to see is funding. i want to see money it. what i would like to see is - funding. i want to see money going into supporting female athletes in the same way that we support the male teams. that their locker rooms, their medical facilities, male teams. that their locker rooms, their medicalfacilities, their access to experts, they care all around the women is equal to that of men. figs around the women is equal to that of me
campaigners argue that the render support them.s _ support them. campaigners argue that the gender gap has held _ support them. campaigners argue that the gender gap has held women's - the gender gap has held women's sport back. here is how to address it. . ., ., ~ sport back. here is how to address it. ~ ., ., ~ ., , sport back. here is how to address it. what i would like to see is fundinu. it. what i would like to see is funding- l— it. what i would like to see is funding. i want _ it....
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i think the reality is - and i won't argue the detail - actually| won't argue the detail — actually what for. what i'm missing, and i'm still missing it from the conservatives as well, is the involvement of the private sector and trying to create the kind of society in which people want to invest here, particularly in those areas in which we are leaders. do ou areas in which we are leaders. do you think part of the problem here though is in the messaging, and the way this is being talked about politically? it's challenging, isn't it, to get people to change their boilers are to insulate their homes, or drive electric if you have politicians who are making decisions which they think are politically expedient, but are effectively rolling back commitments they've made — why would the public decision to change? made - why would the public decision to chance? ~ ., �* , ., to change? well, i don't understand why politicians _ to change? well, i don't understand why politicians don't _ to change? well, i don't understand why politicians don't take _ to change? well, i don't understand why polit
i think the reality is - and i won't argue the detail - actually| won't argue the detail — actually what for. what i'm missing, and i'm still missing it from the conservatives as well, is the involvement of the private sector and trying to create the kind of society in which people want to invest here, particularly in those areas in which we are leaders. do ou areas in which we are leaders. do you think part of the problem here though is in the messaging, and the way this is being talked...
0
0.0
Feb 19, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
they wouldn't say that he did not kill beth lochtefeld, but they would argue that he shouldn't go toson for it. he was, they said, not guilty by reason of insanity. good morning, jurors. hoda kotb: toolan's attorney kevin reddington began by hinting at the turmoil that lurked within tom toolan. see tom toolan? looks good. he's got a suit on and a tie. hair slicked back. certainly someone may say doesn't look crazy to me. hoda kotb: but the master of the universe act was just that, reddington declared, an act. because tom toolan was a mess plagued not just by alcohol abuse but drug addiction, too. his drink of choice would be absolut vodka right out of the bottle. drink a fifth a day. he was on the prescriptions legally. he was taking them illegally. hoda kotb: when beth broke up with him, reddington told the court toolan snapped. the drinking and drugging and even deeper troubles, all of them combined to push him over the edge. kevin reddington: the evidence will show that thomas toolan was suffering from a mental disease a defect at the time of this incident, that he was well within
they wouldn't say that he did not kill beth lochtefeld, but they would argue that he shouldn't go toson for it. he was, they said, not guilty by reason of insanity. good morning, jurors. hoda kotb: toolan's attorney kevin reddington began by hinting at the turmoil that lurked within tom toolan. see tom toolan? looks good. he's got a suit on and a tie. hair slicked back. certainly someone may say doesn't look crazy to me. hoda kotb: but the master of the universe act was just that, reddington...
0
0.0
Feb 3, 2024
02/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i what dad has been arguing about in the last— what dad has been arguing about in the last few— what the last few weeks as he is not i the last few weeks as he is not interested _ the last few weeks as he is not interested in— the last few weeks as he is not interested in another- the last few weeks as he is not| interested in another executive the last few weeks as he is not i interested in another executive if it is a _ interested in another executive if it is a harbour— interested in another executive if it is a harbour between _ interested in another executive if it is a harbour between sinn- interested in another executive if it is a harbour between sinn fein| it is a harbour between sinn fein and the — it is a harbour between sinn fein and the g — it is a harbour between sinn fein and the g d_ it is a harbour between sinn fein and the g d in— it is a harbour between sinn fein and the g d in ——_ it is a harbour between sinn fein and the g d in —— dup. - it is a harbour between sinn fein and the g d in —— dup. is- it is a harbour between sinn fein and the g d in —— dup. is it- it
i what dad has been arguing about in the last— what dad has been arguing about in the last few— what the last few weeks as he is not i the last few weeks as he is not interested _ the last few weeks as he is not interested in— the last few weeks as he is not interested in another- the last few weeks as he is not| interested in another executive the last few weeks as he is not i interested in another executive if it is a _ interested in another executive if it is a harbour— interested in...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
why should we argue with germany, when we no longer argue with england, they should, and then it's best either done it alpha and then after that and you say that the wars are not forgotten, we are commemorating the 1st world war. now, what does this commemoration have to do with us and our lives today? is it still necessary, or is it an old habits that we no longer need? i just need no more stuff on board. we don't really need it anymore, but we are talking about like hometown, great remembrance for a great wall. so many more germans fell in the 2nd world. gold and french find, find mall, which is why the germans often don't understand why, like on gas means. the 1st world war, the most french people, is in the 2nd world war, and this has to be reiterated again and again. front suffered relatively little compared with germany. we didn't really get it, in fact, visually died, so on. so i certainly believe that the 2nd world war left its mark on front. it is buddhist. that was the resistance. a lot of hey ro, i can't see this bottle, lots of heinous things happen to this, such as denuncia
why should we argue with germany, when we no longer argue with england, they should, and then it's best either done it alpha and then after that and you say that the wars are not forgotten, we are commemorating the 1st world war. now, what does this commemoration have to do with us and our lives today? is it still necessary, or is it an old habits that we no longer need? i just need no more stuff on board. we don't really need it anymore, but we are talking about like hometown, great...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
now they argue with that because trump already faced impeachment in the house of representatives for trying to reverse the result of the 2020 election but was not convicted by the senate. but essentially, he already had his day in court and he doesn't need another. now, of course, we know that impeachment proceedings are political proceedings and not criminal proceedings. as thoughts of this argument did not count in the way that tom's lawyers wanted. already heard from the trunk campaign in response to this ruling, this from campaign spokesman is even strong. prosecuting a president for official acts violates the constitution and threatens the bedrock of our republic. president trump respectfully disagrees with the dc circuits decision and will appeal it in order to safe guard the presidency and the constitution. that's where they stand on that. so what's gonna happen next in the me is going to appeal is, is there a guarantee that the supreme court will, will, will hear this case? i mean, do we know what will happen eventually, as well as we heard their trump is expected to appeal.
now they argue with that because trump already faced impeachment in the house of representatives for trying to reverse the result of the 2020 election but was not convicted by the senate. but essentially, he already had his day in court and he doesn't need another. now, of course, we know that impeachment proceedings are political proceedings and not criminal proceedings. as thoughts of this argument did not count in the way that tom's lawyers wanted. already heard from the trunk campaign in...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
people didn't really argue against it. the courts resolve this by saying congress should take action. host: if the justices decide to side with the voters of colorado, what happens then? guest: it depends what grounds they do it. if the court affirms across the board than trump is off the ballot in colorado and he's probably off the ballot in 50 states, it's over. if the court takes any one the arguments, then it gets complicated. one argument that we haven't mentioned yet is we are in a primary. it's not a general election ballot, maybe the colorado republican primary can take them off the ballot. if we go through november and the general election and the case comes back to the court or the court says it's not for cholera to do it, it's for congress, then what happens january 6 of 2025 when there is a joint session of congress to elect the president, what the vice president kamala harris goebbels in the session and democrats in congress object to trump. if the court rules in favor of trump, it depends which approach they
people didn't really argue against it. the courts resolve this by saying congress should take action. host: if the justices decide to side with the voters of colorado, what happens then? guest: it depends what grounds they do it. if the court affirms across the board than trump is off the ballot in colorado and he's probably off the ballot in 50 states, it's over. if the court takes any one the arguments, then it gets complicated. one argument that we haven't mentioned yet is we are in a...
0
0.0
Feb 26, 2024
02/24
by
ALJAZ
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so one argued that the soul factual. and this speaks to the spirit who move along . now, why is this important speaking to the letter and the spirit of the law? because it's conflict, like the ad up is really the conflict. in situations of aggression, a part paid colonialism. you have one of 2 solutions, either resistance, as of chinese argued, could be resistance by force or popular resistance. and that could take years, decades and months in the case of closure area of south africa. we also heard from the 1st day just to millions of casualties. and because of all julia, we speak about almost a 1000000 deaths in the racing. i'll just hear from the french sutler, calling us the other way. is the international community defending international law, a desktop i bought a possibility for how we couldn't send situations as in israel's occupation upon the data by the side. so either has to be local, regional, or resistance that could lead to blood should midgent blood trick as we see in guys up today. or it could be the international music coming together, not like by hypo
so one argued that the soul factual. and this speaks to the spirit who move along . now, why is this important speaking to the letter and the spirit of the law? because it's conflict, like the ad up is really the conflict. in situations of aggression, a part paid colonialism. you have one of 2 solutions, either resistance, as of chinese argued, could be resistance by force or popular resistance. and that could take years, decades and months in the case of closure area of south africa. we also...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
trump's lawyer argued very well. and i don't mean to take anything away from the other lawyer, the lawyer for the colorado voters, but jonathan mitchell, mr. trump's lawyer, did a fine job, conceding points where he had to, acknowledging deficits or defects in his argument where he had to. but with that said, the judges or the justices in this case often know what they're going to do. they have read the briefs, they've thought about it, talked to their clerks, so i don't know that argument is typically outcome determinative. this is also a hard case. i mean, there's a lot of ways in which the colorado voters could lose. they essentially had to run the table if you forgive the billiards analogy, by winning on each and every question, whether the 14th amendment applies to a president. whether mr. trump took the requisite oath or the oath as specified in the constitution. there's a whole series of questions that had to break their way. i don't know that it's terribly unusual that it sound, and i take your point, we don'
trump's lawyer argued very well. and i don't mean to take anything away from the other lawyer, the lawyer for the colorado voters, but jonathan mitchell, mr. trump's lawyer, did a fine job, conceding points where he had to, acknowledging deficits or defects in his argument where he had to. but with that said, the judges or the justices in this case often know what they're going to do. they have read the briefs, they've thought about it, talked to their clerks, so i don't know that argument is...
0
0.0
Feb 2, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
they argue the case should be thrown out.hat's a heavy focus of her response that we anticipate getting today. she has been involved in crafting this language. i'm told that by multiple sources. she's been quiet publically. behind the scenes, focused on the effort to get her pushed out of the case. it does set up a crucial two-week window. we have this hearing on the allegations scheduled for february 15th. she has been subpoenaed to testify at that hearing. looking ahead, the judge has really made a point to project fairness in this case. it's entirely possible that she will be forced to take the stand in this hearing in two weeks. that hearing will be dictated and set up around her response today. >> it's going to be really interesting to see what happens in that hearing with judge mcafee. thank you for bringing your reporting. >>> in less than one week, the supreme court is going to hear arguments on whether or not donald trump can stay on the ballot in colorado. his legal team is preparing their strategy. the case was kic
they argue the case should be thrown out.hat's a heavy focus of her response that we anticipate getting today. she has been involved in crafting this language. i'm told that by multiple sources. she's been quiet publically. behind the scenes, focused on the effort to get her pushed out of the case. it does set up a crucial two-week window. we have this hearing on the allegations scheduled for february 15th. she has been subpoenaed to testify at that hearing. looking ahead, the judge has really...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
trump's lawyer, jonathan mitchell, an experienced supreme court advocate, argued trump isn't covered by the so-called insurrectionist ban. >> a ruling from this court that of a affirms the decision below would not only violate term limits but take away votes from tens of millions americans. >> reporter: and argued january 6 was not even an insurrection. only one justice asked about whether it was. >> so the point is that chaotic effort to overthrow the government is not an insurrection? >> this was a riot, it was not an insurrection. >> reporter: jason murray argued for colorado voters who won their case at the lower court. >> by engaging in insurrection against the constitution, president trump disqualified himself from public office. states have the power to ensure that their citizens' electorate votes are not constitutionally barred from holding office. >> reporter: but the justices appeared much more skeptical. in an ominous sign chief justice said the arguments were at war with history. >> that seems to be a position that is at war with the whole thrust of the 14th amendment and
trump's lawyer, jonathan mitchell, an experienced supreme court advocate, argued trump isn't covered by the so-called insurrectionist ban. >> a ruling from this court that of a affirms the decision below would not only violate term limits but take away votes from tens of millions americans. >> reporter: and argued january 6 was not even an insurrection. only one justice asked about whether it was. >> so the point is that chaotic effort to overthrow the government is not an...