0
0.0
Mar 15, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
she married■é jesse barrett in 1999 and they have seven children.ved a ba from rhodes college and a jd from notre dame law school. she served as a law clerk for judge silberman of the u.s. co the d.c. circuit from 1997-1998 and for justice antonin scalia of the supreme court of the united states during the 1998 term. in washington, d.c., she became a law professor joining the faculty of notre dame law school in 2002. she was appointed audge of the united states court of appeals seventh circuit in 2017. president trump dominated her as an associate justice of the supreme court and she took her seat on october 27, 2020. [applause] i want to begin, justices, with just recognizing this time that we are in, both civic learning centrality of those themes, but also the time warin in the country. we are approaching the 250th anniversary of the nation's founding in a couple of years, and unlike the bicentennial nearly half a century ago, there are a lot of debates about who we are as a country and where we are headed. one of t■he tabhings true across the boa
she married■é jesse barrett in 1999 and they have seven children.ved a ba from rhodes college and a jd from notre dame law school. she served as a law clerk for judge silberman of the u.s. co the d.c. circuit from 1997-1998 and for justice antonin scalia of the supreme court of the united states during the 1998 term. in washington, d.c., she became a law professor joining the faculty of notre dame law school in 2002. she was appointed audge of the united states court of appeals seventh...
0
0.0
Mar 16, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice barrett: that is true.seats of the justice youe place in our dg room where we do not sit in order of seniority. we sit in the order of seats you have taken, but we sit across from one another, and i know that justice sotomayor respects me and we have affection for one another. even when we disagree deeply about the merits, we keep it true to merits, we keep it in our discussion and we keep it even when it is heated on the page of our merits, and if there is one thing i want to communicate to you and the students were watching, the court is a place where we have civil disagreements, and to be are simultaneously the most transparent ranch i because it is said we know exactly why we reach the decisions that we did, because we make the transparent, but we keep a great deal confidential and that gives us of the room to be able to deliberate and talk and think. it is not a rowdy -- it is not like the floor of parliament, but we worked very hard to maintain those norms that i think we are successful. justice sotom
justice barrett: that is true.seats of the justice youe place in our dg room where we do not sit in order of seniority. we sit in the order of seats you have taken, but we sit across from one another, and i know that justice sotomayor respects me and we have affection for one another. even when we disagree deeply about the merits, we keep it true to merits, we keep it in our discussion and we keep it even when it is heated on the page of our merits, and if there is one thing i want to...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice barrett: well, why?mean, i think there's some ge that might be a little bit broad -- justice barrett: -- but, at bottom, griffis case is about a collateral habeas proceeding. and griffin had brought his case after the fa he made it a cause of action. why wou't it work in a trial for him to challenge sheffey's constitutional ability to adjudicate his case? mr. mitchell: but what griffin's case holds is that only congress can provide the me enforcing section iii. and under yoor's hypothetical, congress has not enactesuch statute that would give mr. griffin the right to rhose types of arguments at his trial. so he would have to await legislation from congress. t' oice barrett: okay. argument, so section iii covers president trump. let's say that congress enacts a quo warranto provision that it doesn't really matter this purpose, even -- even a deral prosecutor, to bring remove him froce -- mr. mitchell: mm-hmm. justice barrett: -- in a quo warranto way. wouldn't that be in some tension with impeachment? off
justice barrett: well, why?mean, i think there's some ge that might be a little bit broad -- justice barrett: -- but, at bottom, griffis case is about a collateral habeas proceeding. and griffin had brought his case after the fa he made it a cause of action. why wou't it work in a trial for him to challenge sheffey's constitutional ability to adjudicate his case? mr. mitchell: but what griffin's case holds is that only congress can provide the me enforcing section iii. and under yoor's...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
let me read what amy coney barrett read in her opinion. settled a politically charged issue in the volatile season of a presidential election. particularly in this circumstance, writings on the court should turthe temperature down, not up. for the present purposes, our differences are far more important -- less important than our unanimity. that is interesting in two direions. first of all, they are concerned how their rulings will be viewed at what is a particularly divisive moment. that is the first thing to say. >> that is absolutely correct. you were saying that another interesting thing about it is the acknowledgment of the controversy surrounding it. on a very basic sense, this was a potentially extremely divisive issue. it doesn't get more polarizing than whether or not to disqualify the front runner of a major party. >> you could read it the other way. she says, for present purposes we are agreed. there is a biggerecision on their plate, the immunity case, which they were not bound to take, but they have taken it and will not give
let me read what amy coney barrett read in her opinion. settled a politically charged issue in the volatile season of a presidential election. particularly in this circumstance, writings on the court should turthe temperature down, not up. for the present purposes, our differences are far more important -- less important than our unanimity. that is interesting in two direions. first of all, they are concerned how their rulings will be viewed at what is a particularly divisive moment. that is...
0
0.0
Mar 18, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
chief justice roberts: justice barrett? justice barrett: mr. martinez, i want trern to the question that justice sotomayor raised about stare decisis. so you said that overruling chron wouldn't have an effect the many cases that have gotten to chevron step t a then deferred to the agency. you said -- am i -- did i understa y correctly? martinez: those bottom-line so isn't it inviting a flood of litigation even if for the moment those holdings stay intact? mainez: so i would say the bottom-line holdings in os cases, i would just quibble slightly, i ul-- i would describe the bottom-line holding as being that the en's action was lawful. and so that's the bottom line. i think it's true that people could come and s, ok, the interpretive methods have changed since this bottom-ne holding waised and we think that -- that, you know, a different result n suld apply. and -- and that's why courts consider requests orturn precedent. but i just think that they would apply the same standards that they would apply to other stare decisis inquiries, and i think
chief justice roberts: justice barrett? justice barrett: mr. martinez, i want trern to the question that justice sotomayor raised about stare decisis. so you said that overruling chron wouldn't have an effect the many cases that have gotten to chevron step t a then deferred to the agency. you said -- am i -- did i understa y correctly? martinez: those bottom-line so isn't it inviting a flood of litigation even if for the moment those holdings stay intact? mainez: so i would say the bottom-line...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so how does that -- justice barrett: mr. martiz justice jackson: -- play out under your interion -- so, here, what -- what is the question we're supseto be answering? martinez: the question you' supposed to be answering is, did -- does this staequire -- has congress required -- either required the -- the monitors to be paid for by industry, or has it given the agency the authority to make that decision? and i don't think -- i thi that is a legal -- both ofho versions of that question are legal questions, and the answer is no. juicbarrett: mr. martinez, can i ask you a question about the li bween law and policy? and i want to asyoin the context of one of justice kagan's amples, the dietary supplement or drug. where is the line between something that would be then t to arbitrary and capricious review and something that'a estion of law? because i'm just wondering whether we could say that the definiti of dietary supplement or drug might be something that's qution of statutory interpretation in the context of the state,ut which
so how does that -- justice barrett: mr. martiz justice jackson: -- play out under your interion -- so, here, what -- what is the question we're supseto be answering? martinez: the question you' supposed to be answering is, did -- does this staequire -- has congress required -- either required the -- the monitors to be paid for by industry, or has it given the agency the authority to make that decision? and i don't think -- i thi that is a legal -- both ofho versions of that question are legal...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice amy cney barrett said we agree on this baseline issue. we don't need to snipe at each other across the divide. there was an effort among six conservatives to say we are united and we are friendly and independent. justice barrett said it's a message americans can take home in this frenzies election season. the three liberal justices are not on the same page, and they would lean more in the direction that david was espousing in the piece. the liberal justices are trying to wave a red flag to the public. it doesn't look good because it isn't good. as hard as the majority tries to cover it up with words like unanimity and collegiality, we're reaching dangerously bad decisions for no good reason. dropping the nuclear citation to bush v. gore is as clear as you can get. so if the liberals were going to tell us we should be worried, this is exactly what it would look like. >> i mentioned it at the top, we're waiting for judge aileen cannon to schedule a trial date in the classified documents case. judge mcafee says he will rule on fani willis an
justice amy cney barrett said we agree on this baseline issue. we don't need to snipe at each other across the divide. there was an effort among six conservatives to say we are united and we are friendly and independent. justice barrett said it's a message americans can take home in this frenzies election season. the three liberal justices are not on the same page, and they would lean more in the direction that david was espousing in the piece. the liberal justices are trying to wave a red flag...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice barrett who is just for herself, and sotomayor. kagan and jackson saying this is not a right the that belongs to the state, but all four of them casting doubt on the mechanism of enforcement that this is an enacted legislation. that's important because one other way that you could find that someone is disqualified is for example, through a federal court ruling or you could find that someone is an insurrectionist through their criminal -- through criminal liability. so there are a number of different ways that i think these justices are raising section 3 could have been enforced, and yet the procure yam decision says, but he will be on the ballot. >> andrea is with us. what is your reaction to this? >> two reactions. one is the fact that it is unanimous in result. i think that makes it complicated for people who want to view the decision as political, and that this is the, you know, the conservative wing which is now -- it's a very large wing of six taking this on. i mean, the problem with that analysis, of course, is that you have
justice barrett who is just for herself, and sotomayor. kagan and jackson saying this is not a right the that belongs to the state, but all four of them casting doubt on the mechanism of enforcement that this is an enacted legislation. that's important because one other way that you could find that someone is disqualified is for example, through a federal court ruling or you could find that someone is an insurrectionist through their criminal -- through criminal liability. so there are a number...
0
0.0
Mar 30, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice barrett? justice jackson: one quick clarification -- you say the lloyd's meeting is an explicit threat, fine. what is next in terms of proof? don't they have to show something about her motivation? mr. mcdowell: so, justice jackson, that gets to something mr. cole was talking about. there are two aspects to the claim, the coercion question and the first amendment home question. here the first amendment harm was based on viewpoint discrimination. it would have to show that she was motivated by targeting a particular viewpoint as opposed to targeting of conduct. we just think that the complaint alleges that is what her motive was because on page 223 it says -- it says and most exquisitely, 223, -- explicity, 223, position appendix, she was trying to get them to aid the campaign against gun groups. there was a focus on the speech aspect of the nra as opposed any conduct. justice jackson: thank you. chief justice roberts: thank you, counsel. mr. katyal? mr. katyal: thank you, mr. chief justice, an
justice barrett? justice jackson: one quick clarification -- you say the lloyd's meeting is an explicit threat, fine. what is next in terms of proof? don't they have to show something about her motivation? mr. mcdowell: so, justice jackson, that gets to something mr. cole was talking about. there are two aspects to the claim, the coercion question and the first amendment home question. here the first amendment harm was based on viewpoint discrimination. it would have to show that she was...
0
0.0
Mar 12, 2024
03/24
by
PRESSTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
oliver boy barrett, welcome to economic divide. uh, taking a look at the um, i guess warning that was issued by the world bank on the dire state of the palestinian economy, uh, also on the gaza strip. both are not doing well, there isn't much hope for recuperation at this point, we're wondering how long this is going to take, because the onslot as we speak is still continuing, and uh, what do you think about the future of the occupied west bank given the fact? that you have the the aggression in the gaza strip and the violence that's uh a daily occurrence there in the occupied west bank, what one thing is absolutely for sure is that the uh gravity of the situation uh is unprecedented uh the situation is extremely uh grim uh as i think you just mentioned we've seen a fall uh in the palestinian economic activity of something like uh 80% uh in the last quarter uh we have seen a total fall off in the uh work permits that would be available for uh gasen uh workers uh in the in israel and uh we are seeing that uh on the west bank uh pale
oliver boy barrett, welcome to economic divide. uh, taking a look at the um, i guess warning that was issued by the world bank on the dire state of the palestinian economy, uh, also on the gaza strip. both are not doing well, there isn't much hope for recuperation at this point, we're wondering how long this is going to take, because the onslot as we speak is still continuing, and uh, what do you think about the future of the occupied west bank given the fact? that you have the the aggression...
0
0.0
Mar 28, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice barrett: mr. cole -- mr. cole: -- in order to manage your risk. justice barrett: -- can i ask you a question? are you asking the court to break any new ground in this case? mr. cole: absolutely not. this is about as square corners a bantam books case as you can imagine. justice barrett: how does your understanding of bantam books differ, if at all, from respondent's and from the sg's? mr. cole: so the sg, as you'll note, is essentially on our side in this case, formerly in support of neither party but taking our time because they're supporting reversal on the merits question. we believe that you do have to demonstrate coercion. you have to demonstrate some coercive threat, some invocation of regulatory adverse action. we have that here. we have it with the insurance law enforcement. we have it with the invocation of reputational risk. reputational risk, she didn't just say, you know, guns are bad, you should reconsider your relation with the nra. she said, guns are bad, you should reconsider your
justice barrett: mr. cole -- mr. cole: -- in order to manage your risk. justice barrett: -- can i ask you a question? are you asking the court to break any new ground in this case? mr. cole: absolutely not. this is about as square corners a bantam books case as you can imagine. justice barrett: how does your understanding of bantam books differ, if at all, from respondent's and from the sg's? mr. cole: so the sg, as you'll note, is essentially on our side in this case, formerly in support of...
0
0.0
Mar 13, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
chief justice and justices barrett and kavanaugh, that will find ways to make cases.s this a functional body? >> some may say too functional. they are achieving the things that conservatively the movement wants to achieve. they've won the table on a lot of cases on abortion, guns and affirmative action. so it's functional in that sense. do they get along in the shadow of that kind of division, that's open to question. >> adam liptak, really good to have you. thank you very much. >>> coming up who voters don't want donald trump to pick for vp, and what it says for trouble ahead for voters. by voters, mar-a-lago. >>> and what is stirring up questions and the question of the royal family and the institution of it in the uk. i got the power of 3. i lowered my a1c, cv risk, and lost some weight. in studies, the majority of people reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. i'm under 7. ozempic® lowers the risk of major cardiovascular events such as stroke, heart attack, or death in adults also with known heart disease. i'm lowering my risk. adults lost up to 14 pounds. i los
chief justice and justices barrett and kavanaugh, that will find ways to make cases.s this a functional body? >> some may say too functional. they are achieving the things that conservatively the movement wants to achieve. they've won the table on a lot of cases on abortion, guns and affirmative action. so it's functional in that sense. do they get along in the shadow of that kind of division, that's open to question. >> adam liptak, really good to have you. thank you very much....
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
one measure of this is what justice barrett did. she is of course a trump appointee. she concurred the states do not have these powers. flatly called out the majority for overstepping and going beyond the necessities, to limit how the constitution can
one measure of this is what justice barrett did. she is of course a trump appointee. she concurred the states do not have these powers. flatly called out the majority for overstepping and going beyond the necessities, to limit how the constitution can
0
0.0
Mar 10, 2024
03/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
laura: denver riggleman and barrett marson, thank you you some much for your time. ♪ lul mohamud is theector of a nonprofit organization that supports survivors of domestic violence. the daughter of somali immigrants, her work focuses on helping those from the african immigrant and refugee community around washington, d.c. tonight, she shares her brief but spectacular take on the power and promise of person-centered care. lul: for our survivors who are often retelling stories of violence, of times that they don't want to reflect onthey don't want to repeat, it's already exhausting to do that. then imagine having to worry about the feelings of the one who is listening to you. it makes it that much harder to disclose violence. it makes it that much harder to reach for help. ♪ i was blessed to be born into the somali immigrant community here in the d.c. area. my siblings and i, we were very service-oriented at a really young age. domestic violence is a long continuing global pandemic. i actually volunteered for the person center after my first year of college, and i met the founder and exe
laura: denver riggleman and barrett marson, thank you you some much for your time. ♪ lul mohamud is theector of a nonprofit organization that supports survivors of domestic violence. the daughter of somali immigrants, her work focuses on helping those from the african immigrant and refugee community around washington, d.c. tonight, she shares her brief but spectacular take on the power and promise of person-centered care. lul: for our survivors who are often retelling stories of violence, of...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice barrett? justice jackson?ice jackson: you are asked if the agency is infallible and i guess i am wondering if you think that the courts have specialized scientific knowledge y that has pharmaceuticals, you have concerns about judges parsing medical and scientific studies? ms. ellsworth: yes. i think we have significant concerns and there are two amicus briefs from the pharmaceutical industry that expands on why exactly that is so concerning for pharmaceutical companies who depend on fda's gold standard review process to approve their drugs and be able to sell their products in line with that considered judgment. justice jackson: can you say what they say? ms. ellsworth: i am happy to. i think the reality is and this decision allow is a good example of a. you have a district court that among other things relied on one study that was an analysis of anonymous blog posts. you have another set of studies that he relied on that were not in the administrative record and would not be because theisions. they have been
justice barrett? justice jackson?ice jackson: you are asked if the agency is infallible and i guess i am wondering if you think that the courts have specialized scientific knowledge y that has pharmaceuticals, you have concerns about judges parsing medical and scientific studies? ms. ellsworth: yes. i think we have significant concerns and there are two amicus briefs from the pharmaceutical industry that expands on why exactly that is so concerning for pharmaceutical companies who depend on...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
p barrett: mr. ect ecie eq e i'm interested in the governments conceding that if there was coercion that we automatically have a first amendment violation. mr. fletcher: i'm not conceding ea flipside. we acknowledge there can be both ce ns mr. fletcher: sure. 230 qualify? ha. have a power to influence that. abgo and i also think the platforms should be doing better. i understand that. s that if you don't change your moderation policies, you are responsible for killing people. e could that, in someffr ib blgiin i think it's clea-- exultation, not a threat. d l at which coercion kicks in? ifo'lu ierat thaen wam.ntabonon media, what a reasonable person might view as coercive -- maybe the press secretary yells on a bhercnmth and when they said no to the governmeaged in more speech. pulpit. or st ea this mision does not gain any following.n independent judgment -- that is what the first amendment protects. private parties to exclude ipaerrs adto saying your algorithms and the way yououen platforms to exc
p barrett: mr. ect ecie eq e i'm interested in the governments conceding that if there was coercion that we automatically have a first amendment violation. mr. fletcher: i'm not conceding ea flipside. we acknowledge there can be both ce ns mr. fletcher: sure. 230 qualify? ha. have a power to influence that. abgo and i also think the platforms should be doing better. i understand that. s that if you don't change your moderation policies, you are responsible for killing people. e could that, in...
0
0.0
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
PRESSTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
sterling is investigative journalist joining us from walnot creek in california. we also have kevin barrett, editor veterans today joining us from saidia over in morocco. welcome to you both. westerling, i'll start with you. there's a couple um shocking, not that before we didn't hear shocking news coming out of the gaza strip, one of them is the fact that you have people uh in one particular incident that's uh now been broadcast that are eating cactus for food, the other is the massacer that took place where the military eight convoy comes, not the military but eight convoy comes, palestinians line up for food and then they get shot at by the regime forces and they killed over 100 uh these are gross uh violations this particular one the massacer uh that's a genocide that's taking place and it's a war crime - we're still we're still looking at this happening, what do you make of the fact that this is still continuing by the israeli regime? yeah, well, i think israel is spitting in the face of the international court of justice, which uh ruled at the end of uh at the end of january that isra
sterling is investigative journalist joining us from walnot creek in california. we also have kevin barrett, editor veterans today joining us from saidia over in morocco. welcome to you both. westerling, i'll start with you. there's a couple um shocking, not that before we didn't hear shocking news coming out of the gaza strip, one of them is the fact that you have people uh in one particular incident that's uh now been broadcast that are eating cactus for food, the other is the massacer that...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justin -- justice barrett and i believe other justices write concurrences as well. they may have gotten to this in a different way. i don't see any dissents here. it sounds like the court as a whole is agreed whatever happened with colorado, it was not the proper framework to use here. there is discussion at the end of the main decision that says, you know, there would be essentially a patchwork across the state. so this was one of the worries that the justices had and the questions that came together in argument were, what happens if we tell one state they can do this? the chief justice said what if one state decides, ok be i'm kicking off a republican and another state says ok, i'm kicking off a democrat? and then we get down to just a handful of states that have all of the candidates' names on the ballot, what would that do to this country? it sounds like the majority of the court has come together in this voice to say what happened in colorado is not correct. it sounds like they're saying states don't have this power. but essentially, this is something that shou
justin -- justice barrett and i believe other justices write concurrences as well. they may have gotten to this in a different way. i don't see any dissents here. it sounds like the court as a whole is agreed whatever happened with colorado, it was not the proper framework to use here. there is discussion at the end of the main decision that says, you know, there would be essentially a patchwork across the state. so this was one of the worries that the justices had and the questions that came...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice coney barrett: mr. whether or not that ultimately becomes a first amendment violation -- i appreciate the coercion point in the governments first point with respect to the merit of this -- but i'm interested in your view that the context does not principles." i understood our first amendment to require heightened scrutiny of government restrictions of speech but not total prohibition when you're talking about a ment to ensure that the public has accurate information in the context of a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic. i'm interested in the governments conceding that if there was coercion that we automatically have a first amendment violation. mr. fletcher: i'm not conceding that is the case. our position is that there was h. >> you mentioned coercion repeatedly in terms of threats. could there also be coercion in terms of inducements? mr. fletcher: they are often the flipside. we acknowledge there can be both but there has to be a threat or inducement of some concrete government action. >> and hypotheticall
justice coney barrett: mr. whether or not that ultimately becomes a first amendment violation -- i appreciate the coercion point in the governments first point with respect to the merit of this -- but i'm interested in your view that the context does not principles." i understood our first amendment to require heightened scrutiny of government restrictions of speech but not total prohibition when you're talking about a ment to ensure that the public has accurate information in the context...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice barrett? >> that's right. it does undercut the idea that this is a court that you know, unanimously can understand what was at issue here. i don't want to take away from the 90 ruling that donald trump has to remain on the ballot. but there's a very fundamental difference on how far the court should even even go on in terms of how section three of the 14th amendment would be enforced. that's the provision that was at issue here. the anti-insurrectionist provision. and what the majority said was that only congress, through specific legislation can enforce that and the justices who concurred, at least the three liberal said what about if there was a prosecution of someone who had been in their words and oath-breaking insurrectionists. and justice, amy coney barrett agreed with the three liberals that it shouldn't just be specific congressional legislation so that should enforce this anti-insurrectionist ban. but she was very tempered in her approach and she took a shot at those liberals who, in writing up their
justice barrett? >> that's right. it does undercut the idea that this is a court that you know, unanimously can understand what was at issue here. i don't want to take away from the 90 ruling that donald trump has to remain on the ballot. but there's a very fundamental difference on how far the court should even even go on in terms of how section three of the 14th amendment would be enforced. that's the provision that was at issue here. the anti-insurrectionist provision. and what the...
0
0.0
Mar 9, 2024
03/24
by
PRESSTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
old boy barrett, welcome back to economic divide. i'd like to zoom in on uh announcement slash warning that the us treasury secretary janeth yellen actually issued against netanyahu where it's she said that uh he needs to take steps to prevent the collapse of the west bank economy. as far as i recall the u.s. has a almost a direct hand in contributing to the uh west bank economy uh not in favor of the palace. such as settlements, the freedom of movement, indirectly, these are financially supported by the us, so isn't the us actually responsible in some regards? yeah, i think essentially robert, sorry, rfk junior, recently got it right when he described uh the the role of israel for the united states is as kind of aircraft, aircraft carrier is the term that he used. so the united for the united states uh, i think he has this right, israel is kind of permanent, permanently anchored aircraft carrier uh and its purposes to uh ensure that us foreign policies in the in the middle east are carried out that us hegemony is sustained and that
old boy barrett, welcome back to economic divide. i'd like to zoom in on uh announcement slash warning that the us treasury secretary janeth yellen actually issued against netanyahu where it's she said that uh he needs to take steps to prevent the collapse of the west bank economy. as far as i recall the u.s. has a almost a direct hand in contributing to the uh west bank economy uh not in favor of the palace. such as settlements, the freedom of movement, indirectly, these are financially...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but amy coney barrett, that is said, i see your patchwork and i raised you instructions for congress on what they ought to do next. now, we call that legislation, but forgive me for being a little bit cynical here. show me the money figures speaking. you see what happens in the supreme court ponds to congress, right section five of the voting rights act comes to mind as exhibit number a we're waiting for that new pre-clearance formula. right. >> are you >> well-conserved, justice? amy coney, barrett, ape donald trump's third nominee, agreeing that the court went too far, maybe one to stop also at the hello patchwork but also taking time in issue with her liberal colleagues quote saying, in my judgment, this is not the time to amplify disagreement with stridency. writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up but it's interesting but now is the time to take the temperature down and it politically charged environment. i want to wind now of all times, what were other cases were decided during politically charged times? >> which vigour >> no >> roe v. wade overtu
but amy coney barrett, that is said, i see your patchwork and i raised you instructions for congress on what they ought to do next. now, we call that legislation, but forgive me for being a little bit cynical here. show me the money figures speaking. you see what happens in the supreme court ponds to congress, right section five of the voting rights act comes to mind as exhibit number a we're waiting for that new pre-clearance formula. right. >> are you >> well-conserved, justice?...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice barrett continued. the court e has settled a politically-charged issue in the volatile season of a presidential election, particularly in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up. for present purposes, our differences are far less important than our unanimity. all nine justices agree on the outcome of this case. that is the message americans should take home. it's written not like a supreme court justice, but like a political speech writer -- the message americans should take home. justice sotomayor and justice kagan and justice jackson highlighted the wild inconsistency of the roberts court by quoting chief justice roberts himself who wrote this when he joined the majority opinion in overturning roe v. wade. quote, if it is not necessary to decide more to dispose of a case, then it is not necessary to decide more. the three justices then said, that fundamental principle of judicial restraint is practically as old as our republic, yet the court continues
justice barrett continued. the court e has settled a politically-charged issue in the volatile season of a presidential election, particularly in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up. for present purposes, our differences are far less important than our unanimity. all nine justices agree on the outcome of this case. that is the message americans should take home. it's written not like a supreme court justice, but like a political speech...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice amy coney barrett also urged americans to see unity from the unanimous decision. "in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up." colorado's democratic secretary of state offered sharp criticism of the decision. >> i do believe that states should be allowed under the constitution to bar insurrectionists. >> reporter: the ruling comes a day before super tuesday, the biggest primary election day of the season, when voters in 15 states including colorado head to the polls. and trump's legal hurdles continue to pile up as the supeme court weighs another decision next month. >> i hope that the justices because they will be working on some other cases, but one in particular, presidents have to be given total immunity. they have to be allowed to do their job. >> reporter: later this month, trump will also spend six weeks in court, where he is charged with falsifying business records related to hush money payments to a porn star. today trump's former cfo allen weisselberg pled guilty to two counts of perjury in the new york
justice amy coney barrett also urged americans to see unity from the unanimous decision. "in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up." colorado's democratic secretary of state offered sharp criticism of the decision. >> i do believe that states should be allowed under the constitution to bar insurrectionists. >> reporter: the ruling comes a day before super tuesday, the biggest primary election day of the season, when...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
he might have a tough time with one of his appointees, amy coney barrett.ross the uk, this is bbc news. let's look at some other stories making news. charities and campaigners are urging ministers to set up an inquiry into the treatment of unaccompanied children seeking asylum in the uk. the call comes after an official report said basic checks to keep children safe in asylum hotels were not carried out. the home office said the welfare of the children was an utmost priority. there will be no option of a life on benefits for young people under labour according to its shadow work and pensions secretary, liz kendall. new figures show more than 850,000 people between the age of 18 and 24 were not in work, education or training in the last three months of last year. a rare ferrari stolen 28 years ago from an ex—formula one driver in london has been recovered by police. the vehicle was shipped to japan after it was taken from gerhard berger in 1995. the car, worth £350,000, was one of two ferraris were stolen. the other remains missing. no arrests have been made
he might have a tough time with one of his appointees, amy coney barrett.ross the uk, this is bbc news. let's look at some other stories making news. charities and campaigners are urging ministers to set up an inquiry into the treatment of unaccompanied children seeking asylum in the uk. the call comes after an official report said basic checks to keep children safe in asylum hotels were not carried out. the home office said the welfare of the children was an utmost priority. there will be no...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
our differences are far less important than our unanimity, barrett wrote.ll 9 justices agree on the outcome of this case. that is the message all americans should take home. >> so let's get right to terry moran. this unanimous ruling today, justice amy cohen barrett as you just reported there suggested the supreme court turn the national temperature down. but that might be impossible because the nation's highest court is now preparing to hear another case with potentially major consequences here in the race for president. of course, donald trump appealed that lower court decision. that court saying donald trump does not have absolute immunity in his federal election interference case. the supreme court now agreeing to take up trump's appeal and decide on presidential immunity, which is major. >> that's right, really big, david. that case is now set for argument at the end of april, so expect a decision in late may or june as all these cases grind on. today is super tuesday. voters go to the polls in 15 states and donald trump remains on the ballot in every
our differences are far less important than our unanimity, barrett wrote.ll 9 justices agree on the outcome of this case. that is the message all americans should take home. >> so let's get right to terry moran. this unanimous ruling today, justice amy cohen barrett as you just reported there suggested the supreme court turn the national temperature down. but that might be impossible because the nation's highest court is now preparing to hear another case with potentially major...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
conservative justice amy coney barrett siding with the three liberal justices against her conservativeues saying they went too far by ruling the only way for the 14th amendments insurrection ban to be enforced is if congress passes legislation first. i want to bring in former senior investigative counsel for the house select committee to investigate january 6th. also with us, president and ceo of the national constitution center, jeffrey rosen. he is author of the new book "the pursuit of happiness how classical writers on virtue inspired the lives of the founders and defined america." jeffrey, help us understand the importance of this split. >> this split is significant, and the most important thing is that the liberals feel that the court went so far that they quoted bush v. gore and the majority's decision in dobbs, the abortion case. they say they quoted justice briar as saying what was done should have been left undone. they quoted dobbs saying if it's not necessary to decide, it's necessary to not decide. it's right to kick him off the ballot for states but for courts to go beyon
conservative justice amy coney barrett siding with the three liberal justices against her conservativeues saying they went too far by ruling the only way for the 14th amendments insurrection ban to be enforced is if congress passes legislation first. i want to bring in former senior investigative counsel for the house select committee to investigate january 6th. also with us, president and ceo of the national constitution center, jeffrey rosen. he is author of the new book "the pursuit of...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
there were four other justices, the three liberals and barrett, who dissented from that. the three liberals more sharply than barrett, but i think it really doesn't sound quite right to say that this was unanimous when the court were so fractured over why exactly trump should remain on the ballot and how far into the future this relations stretch when it comes to shielding or not shielding other interest -- other insurrectionists. >> go deeper. take us inside the court. while it was unanimous decision, liberals had their criticisms, amy coney barrett came out and said, we need to be united here, we need to take down the temperature. what is going on? >> well, the three liberals separate opinion was actually a style as a concurrence. i looked at the metadata and the decision. it was originally styled as a descent. in fact, there is more. that opinion, well i stated to be a joint authored by the wealthy liberal justices, it was actually originally authored by sotomayor by herself. at some point in the process, the other two liberals joined. deciding to make it a show of for
there were four other justices, the three liberals and barrett, who dissented from that. the three liberals more sharply than barrett, but i think it really doesn't sound quite right to say that this was unanimous when the court were so fractured over why exactly trump should remain on the ballot and how far into the future this relations stretch when it comes to shielding or not shielding other interest -- other insurrectionists. >> go deeper. take us inside the court. while it was...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice amy coney barrett also urged americans to see unity from the unanimous decision, writing, "inrcumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up." colorado's democratic secretary of state offered sharp criticism of the decision. >> i do believe that states should be able under our constitution to bar oath-breaking insurrectionists. >> reporter: the ruling comes a day before super tuesday, the biggest primary election day of the season, when voters in 15 states, including colorado, head to the polls. and trump's legal hurdles continue to pile up as the supreme court weighs another decision next month. >> presidents have to be given total immunity. they have to be allowed to do their job. >> reporter: later this month, trump will also spend six weeks in court, where he is charged with falsifying business records related to hush money payments to a porn star. today trump's former cfo, allen weisselberg, pled guilty to two counts of perjury in the new york civil fraud case, but he will not testify against his former boss. looking ahead to tomorrow,
justice amy coney barrett also urged americans to see unity from the unanimous decision, writing, "inrcumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up." colorado's democratic secretary of state offered sharp criticism of the decision. >> i do believe that states should be able under our constitution to bar oath-breaking insurrectionists. >> reporter: the ruling comes a day before super tuesday, the biggest primary election day of the...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i think what justice jackson is asking or what i asked before or what justice barrett is asking, is there any broader conscience objection that appears in the declarations? >> yes, and here it means removing an embryo fetus whether or not they are alive and dr. francis talks about being required -- >> whether or not there's any live tissue? >> yes, your honor. >> where are we looking for that? >> i would point your honor to ja-155, where she talks about completing an abortion, and pages 142 and 143 describe the harm of being involved in an elective abortion, your honor. the doctors performing a dnc must scrape out a woman's uterus, and other cases have indicated that. >> it's my understanding that sometimes the completion, it doesn't involve surgical intervention. do you have a sense of how often -- we may get all the way down the chain to the doctors there, and the person is having an emergency procedure, and my understanding is with some of the chemical abortion scenarios, the completion occurs by prescribing additional medication. do you have a sense of how many times the completion is
i think what justice jackson is asking or what i asked before or what justice barrett is asking, is there any broader conscience objection that appears in the declarations? >> yes, and here it means removing an embryo fetus whether or not they are alive and dr. francis talks about being required -- >> whether or not there's any live tissue? >> yes, your honor. >> where are we looking for that? >> i would point your honor to ja-155, where she talks about completing...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it really stood out was amy coney barrett siding with the liberals? it parts in here, but also should this short but really interesting concurrence were in another part, she was urging the public to look past the fact that four of the courts members herself included, disagreed with how broadly that this decision was made. it and she wrote, in my judgment, this is not the time to amplify disagreement with strident see >> o lord kaitlan, save us the sanctimony has justice barrett read any of any frankly, any opinion written by justice thomas or justice alito over the last frankly, several decades, has she read justice alito's opinion in dobbs? the case that overturned roe v. wade, justice alito's opinion in the mifepristone case, we're the abortion pill case where he all but accused president biden of seeking to violate the law by not following the supreme court. the idea of supreme court justices using sharp language to express their views with opinions they disagree with is nothing new the idea that all of a sudden now we're going to wag our fingers a
it really stood out was amy coney barrett siding with the liberals? it parts in here, but also should this short but really interesting concurrence were in another part, she was urging the public to look past the fact that four of the courts members herself included, disagreed with how broadly that this decision was made. it and she wrote, in my judgment, this is not the time to amplify disagreement with strident see >> o lord kaitlan, save us the sanctimony has justice barrett read any...
0
0.0
Mar 31, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice barrett: this goes to the merits. as indstand it, the serious consequences that have to be ported or that the fda considers risks are deh d transfusion but it seems to me that the data bears it out that the elimination t in person dispensing requirement or visit at the outsewod lead to mistakes in gestational aging, which could increase the need for a dnc or the amount of bleeding but that does not count as an adverse event? ms. prelogar: there is a lisof serious events and i am not sure at i have all of them down to be able to recite them although they aren e record. i inthe premise is wrong the idea that they changed in pers dispensing would increase the risk. th was not reflected in the data that the fda consulted and i would point you to a particular sectionn rticular where the fda explains that even in person yoarnot getting an ultrasound, that has never been required. the reva question might be is your provider is going to ask you a number of's straining questions and there is no reason why that difference would
justice barrett: this goes to the merits. as indstand it, the serious consequences that have to be ported or that the fda considers risks are deh d transfusion but it seems to me that the data bears it out that the elimination t in person dispensing requirement or visit at the outsewod lead to mistakes in gestational aging, which could increase the need for a dnc or the amount of bleeding but that does not count as an adverse event? ms. prelogar: there is a lisof serious events and i am not...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
what else want to talk about another concurring opinion and that's from justice barrett and here it's interesting. she is she doesn't want to sign on with the liberals are saying because they're arguing that they went too far. she said, in my judgment this is not the time to amplify disagreement with stridency. the court has settled a politically charged issue in a volatile season of a presidential election. yes. fair? true. but laura, that's what the supreme court does. they settled volatile questions of national significance so this quote could come back to haunt her because she goes on to say, particularly in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up, but we know that's not always what supreme court decisions do. so i get what she's saying here. this is a time for consensus. a lot of questions about partisanship and ethics on the supreme court for the good of the country, we should all turn the temperature down, not up, but that, that could come back to haunt her in future decisions when right. she goes against maybe her colleagues g
what else want to talk about another concurring opinion and that's from justice barrett and here it's interesting. she is she doesn't want to sign on with the liberals are saying because they're arguing that they went too far. she said, in my judgment this is not the time to amplify disagreement with stridency. the court has settled a politically charged issue in a volatile season of a presidential election. yes. fair? true. but laura, that's what the supreme court does. they settled volatile...
0
0.0
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
PRESSTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
let me thank sterling investigative journalists there from walnor creek, california, and also kevin barrett, editor at veterans, today spoke to us from sydia over in morocco. thank you to you both. with that we come to an end for this news review. لو وافق صدام على كل قرارات الامم المتحده وعلى كل ما تريده الولايات المتحده لكان قد اطيح به كان المفروض عندما يسقطون النظام يسلمون الدوله للمعارضه هم اسقطوا النظام والدوله معا وسلموا المعارضه صراع على السلطه اول من وجه ضربه للامريكان في العراق هي الفصائل الشيعيه المدعومه من ابو مهدي یک سوال بزرگ در مقابل آمریکا ایجاد شد که شما اشغال کردید آمریکا را چی عراق را چی به دست آورد الحجد ايضا كان عامل جديد غير المعادله لذلك في فتره ترامب جاؤوا وقالوا بصراحه هذا انتهى عليكم ان تتخذوا موقف. and welcome back here everyone you're watching press tv world news condemnations continue puring in from cross the globe f is really massacre of over 100 palestinians who are waiting for life saving aid in northern gaza. euran's foreign ministery spokesperson described the attack on defenseless civilians as barbaric. noster canon he said shame of supporting and remaining
let me thank sterling investigative journalists there from walnor creek, california, and also kevin barrett, editor at veterans, today spoke to us from sydia over in morocco. thank you to you both. with that we come to an end for this news review. لو وافق صدام على كل قرارات الامم المتحده وعلى كل ما تريده الولايات المتحده لكان قد اطيح به كان المفروض عندما يسقطون النظام يسلمون الدوله...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
now, justice barrett, one donald trump's appointees. the third one, in fact, split off a bit also, but not joining the liberals. >> interesting and aly, i'm just wondering read, it looks like page 13 of those it says for the reasons given responsibility for enforcing section three against federal office holders and candidates rests with congress and not the states, right? the judgment the colorado supreme court therefore cannot stand. so they're saying essentially that congress has to make this decision >> whether there >> are insurrectionist who need to be kept off of ballots. is that essentially what they're saying? essentially what they're saying is it's up to congress to tell us how this works. so if congress had, let's say 50 years ago, congress had passed a law saying, we're going to let the states do it, so long as they they abide by due process, then what colorado did would have been fine, but congress has done essentially nothing in the 150 years since the 14th amendment was ratified. in 18, 68. now, i want to make sure people
now, justice barrett, one donald trump's appointees. the third one, in fact, split off a bit also, but not joining the liberals. >> interesting and aly, i'm just wondering read, it looks like page 13 of those it says for the reasons given responsibility for enforcing section three against federal office holders and candidates rests with congress and not the states, right? the judgment the colorado supreme court therefore cannot stand. so they're saying essentially that congress has to...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and notably, justice barrett wrote her own concurrence. she said, look, i don't want to sign on to the exact language that these liberal justices are using. she also said, quote, in my judgment, this is not the time to amplify disagreement with stridency the court has settled a politically charged issue in the volatile season of a presidential election, particularly in this circumstance writings in the court should turn the national temperature down not up. now of course, she's speaking to the fact that this is a case about trump political tensions running high right now, it comes to the court at a moment, dana, when they are under a lot of scrutiny for ethics questions about partisanship. and it is notable that here this is a unanimous decision. it is also of course, a win for the former president. but this quote, this idea that they used, they should turn the temperature down, not up they always still of course, with politically charged issues. this is a quote that could come back to hunter and it just a month and half they will all be b
and notably, justice barrett wrote her own concurrence. she said, look, i don't want to sign on to the exact language that these liberal justices are using. she also said, quote, in my judgment, this is not the time to amplify disagreement with stridency the court has settled a politically charged issue in the volatile season of a presidential election, particularly in this circumstance writings in the court should turn the national temperature down not up. now of course, she's speaking to the...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and coney barrett and friends didn't seem to mind that at all. to return just for a moment to the three liberal justices, they dropped one more giant anvil on their right wing colleagues. writing that it appeared the majority was looking to insulate donald trump from future controversy. adding that the ruling shuts the door on other potential means of federal enforcement of section 3, in scotus language, that's like playing the dozens and talking about your mama. consider the gauntlet thrown. today, colorado secretary of state jena griswold shared her disappointment in the court's decision and she pointed out the flaw of leaving this mess for congress to fix. >> my larger reaction is disappointment. i do believe that states should be able under our constitution to bar oath breaking insurrectionists. and ultimately, this decision leaves open the door for congress to act to pass authorizing legislation. but we know that congress is a nearly nonfunctioning body. >> joining me now is a professor of constitutional law at nyu school of law, and melissa
and coney barrett and friends didn't seem to mind that at all. to return just for a moment to the three liberal justices, they dropped one more giant anvil on their right wing colleagues. writing that it appeared the majority was looking to insulate donald trump from future controversy. adding that the ruling shuts the door on other potential means of federal enforcement of section 3, in scotus language, that's like playing the dozens and talking about your mama. consider the gauntlet thrown....
0
0.0
Mar 3, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and they may have also wondered why justice barrett refused to answer such an obvious question with such a self-evident answer. wasn't it settled that ivf free trade agreement is not only legally protected -- ivf treatment is not only legally protected but also a scientific miracle. think of it for a moment. the science here that is now accessible to every american everyone in the world. and pro-family having children parents who wanted child and they may have wondered as well wasn't ivf the last best hope for so many people struggling with infertility desperately seeking to experience the miracle of childbirth for themselves? who could to that miracle in the lives of a family who would not only relish but raise a child to contribute to our great country? what has become devastatingly and tragically clear is that the republican party's animosity towards women's rights doesn't stop at abortion. it's why i asked that ivf and it's why i didn't get a clear answer from a republican nominee of the supreme court. the war on women and on reproductive choices by women and the war on families hasn
and they may have also wondered why justice barrett refused to answer such an obvious question with such a self-evident answer. wasn't it settled that ivf free trade agreement is not only legally protected -- ivf treatment is not only legally protected but also a scientific miracle. think of it for a moment. the science here that is now accessible to every american everyone in the world. and pro-family having children parents who wanted child and they may have wondered as well wasn't ivf the...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
stice barrett: this goes to the merits. serious consequences that have to be reportedr at the fda considers risks are death and he data bears it out thato the elimination of the in peon spensing requirement or visit at the outset would lead mistakes in gestational aging, which could increase the need for a dnc or the amount of bleeding but that does not count as an adverse event? ms. prelogar: there is a list of serious events and i am not sure that i he l of them down to be able to recite them although they are in the reco. i think the prisis wrong the idea that they changed in person dispensing would increase the risk. that was n rlected in the data that the fda consulted and wod point you to a particular section in particul where the fda explains that even in person you are not geinan ultrasound, that has never been required. the relevant questn ght be is your provider is going to ask you a number of's straining questions and there is no reason why ifference would lead to different safety outputs. justice barrett: i thou
stice barrett: this goes to the merits. serious consequences that have to be reportedr at the fda considers risks are death and he data bears it out thato the elimination of the in peon spensing requirement or visit at the outset would lead mistakes in gestational aging, which could increase the need for a dnc or the amount of bleeding but that does not count as an adverse event? ms. prelogar: there is a list of serious events and i am not sure that i he l of them down to be able to recite them...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and that's when barrett said but you don't know necessarily that there's a living embryo there at allcarriage. >> yeah, it's a serious topic. i'm only smiling at the altitude of the logical problems there, right? standing means you have skin in the game. and the fact that you want to prevent someone else from doing something that you have nothing to do with may not be enough skin in the game legally. alexis, nina also raised the point that have been women jurists involved is a positive as opposed to having nine men make decisions that affect the other half of the population. you almost get the impression that diversity, equity, inclusion, can improve a group process, but you know, that's a debate for another day, right? >> different subject. >> exactly. dei. >> there's real science behind diversity. >> coming to an organization near you. i want to play something for you, alexis. maybe i'll have you both back to talk about that. but i did want to play the second point nina raised. we know what it's really about. but then anyone who's ever been in a meeting or a debate or argument where
and that's when barrett said but you don't know necessarily that there's a living embryo there at allcarriage. >> yeah, it's a serious topic. i'm only smiling at the altitude of the logical problems there, right? standing means you have skin in the game. and the fact that you want to prevent someone else from doing something that you have nothing to do with may not be enough skin in the game legally. alexis, nina also raised the point that have been women jurists involved is a positive as...