the analysis was carried out by bellingket using personnel and social networks, as well as a 3d modelof the missile, shows that the ammunition is russian. this conclusion coincides with the opinion of experts, including faibian hoffmann, phd at the university of oslo, who specializes in missile technology, and dr. jeffrey lewis, an expert on nuclear weapons and missiles at the miltbury institute for international studies in manteria, california. in an email to bellingket, he made a similar conclusion that the kha-101 missile can be seen in footage of the attack published on social networks. in spite of statements and evidence. experts from different parts of the world that it was a russian missile, other versions are being spread in the russian federation. initially , the ministry of foreign affairs of russia began to claim on the x social network that the missile was american-made and that it was launched from a ukrainian anti-aircraft missile system. later, russia's representative to the un , vasyl nebendze, at the radbe emergency meeting, stated that it was norway that supplied ukr

in an email to bellingket, he made a similar conclusion that the kha101 missile can be seen in the footagehe attack published on social networks. in spite of... given and evidence of experts from different parts of the world that it was a russian missile, the vrf disseminates other versions. initially, the social networks of the ministry of foreign affairs of russia began to claim that the missile was american -made and that it was launched from a ukrainian anti-aircraft missile system. later , russia's representative to the un, vasyl nebeyndze , stated at an emergency meeting of the security council that it was norway that supplied ukraine with the nasams, from which the missile was fired at ohmadid. not in the un. exclude the possibility that it could really be a russian missile, - reports reuters, referring to the comment of the head of the un human rights monitoring mission, danielle bell. video analysis and on-scene evaluation indicate a high probability that the children's hospital suffered a direct hit rather than damage from an intercepted weapon system. the reaction of the leaders

missiles at the mildbury institute for international studies in monteria, california. in an email to bellingketilar conclusion that the x101 missile can be seen in the footage of the attack published on social networks. despite the statements and evidence of experts from different parts of the world that it was a russian missile, other versions are being circulated. first social network x ministry of russian foreign affairs began to claim that the missile was american-made and that it was launched from a ukrainian anti-aircraft missile system. later , russia's representative to the un, vasyl nebendze , stated at an emergency meeting of the security council that it was norway that supplied ukraine with the missile from which the missile was fired at ohmadid. the un does not rule out the possibility that it really could have been a russian missile, - reports reuters, referring to the comment of the head of the un human rights monitoring mission, danielle bell. video analysis and assessment, taken at the scene indicates a high probability that... the children's hospital suffered a direct hit rathe