yes, when benas, for example , treats a regime that is openly childish or commits genocidal operations, he is committing a war crime. the treatment that should be done is not done, what hope is there for this international law system. we wanted to prove these things, then after proving these things, now we want to be persistent in the international authorities . let me tell you that when we look at the paper, i think that for many of these questions, too. even if it has been proven , we don't really have a correct legal answer. let's assume that we proved that this terrorist act was actually carried out by a group that is affiliated or under the control of the zionist regime. is there a regime or not, even beyond that , it was proven that this was actually an armed attack on our territory against a third party, so what do we want to do? the security council, in fact, let's refer to the security council. as you said, it convened a meeting, but the united states of america, england, i don't know what position france is showing, the composition of that council is an unfair composition, ex

when benas, for example, is childish with a regime that is openly committing genocide or committing war crimes, it is not dealt with as it should be. the international law system said that we should prove these things, then after proving these things, now we should try to be persistent in the international authorities. even if these questions are proven, we don't really have a correct legal answer we came to prove that this terrorist act by in fact, a group that is affiliated with or under the control of the zionist regime , we even proved that the regime itself is behind this or not. even beyond that, it was proved that this was actually an armed attack on our territory against a third party has already been done, so what do we want to do, we will check the options, we want to go to the security council in fact. the security council held a meeting as you said, but the united states, america , england, i don't know what position france showed in general, the composition of that council is an unfair composition, exactly , it is an unfair composition, it is an undemocratic composition , a

child, there was nothing to expect, well, it happens, in general, you fought, you suffer forever... bena was, and mother is alive, i don’t know, in what sense, so find out, max, i ’ll tell you this, and you’re right, i didn’t grow up like you, but as a child, when i was little, my mother committed suicide. i would delete everything to see him now, don’t waste time, find her, okay, i’ll go, she’ll give you a lift to the city. when you figure everything out, be sure to call me back, sorry that you are so sad, i'm just tired of these events, oh, and what about your pastry shops, you have such a huge chain, my friend runs the pastry shops, she copes with it perfectly, i just control the process. " i haven't done anything with my hands for a long time, i don't bake, and i don't want to, then the amount of money you gave me, i put it aside, maybe when..." now you are my heir, what a pleasant surprise, right, lyubochka? arseni mikhailovich, why? i have already accepted a huge sum of money from you. it's already very late, it's okay, when there's no one, i feel calmer doing the paperwork, goodby

do you see us, please, rozochka raivovna, us, well, the last chance, where is she bena nata do you need what do two or three mean to me, this is love, in short, that means, these are dear ilya and valentina, dear, ivan and zhanna, dear, olga and gennady, olga and gennady. do you agree to get married and go hand in hand through life until the end of your days. ilya and valentina, do you agree? yes, great. ivan and zhanna, do you agree you? yes, you agree. great. olga and gennady, well, you agree. agreed, agreed. in short, i pronounce you husband and wife. so congratulations, happiness, any advice here and there, well, i congratulate you the same, bitter, bitter, bitter, bitter, bitter, signatures have been put, the deal has been concluded, not subject to appeal, well, what about the artist, did she like it, delighted, yes, boys, well done, well, if only the advice had stayed there, i would have said it straight out, a couple and a couple, it worked out, it was cool, i even liked it, i would have done it a couple more times. yes, i think that it's over, maybe we'll get divorced again toda

i want to say again, this principle, where it's good tamirdina, ubi bena, ubipatri, it doesn't work,you are, i 'm talking about this, it seems to me, this example is just erchay, here is an illustration, no more such, such, you know, such a life strategy, i live, i am a citizen of the world, oh no, principles can not protect you, as it turned out, only your country, and this is not a country, like there, kids and nevis, but some other one, please, oleg viktorovich. in general, i can only share the opinion of my colleagues, this show does not make any sense, if behind it is not what macron let slip, behind it is big politics. as mr. stokin correctly said, geopolitics, it is completely clear that it is easy to make a victim out of durov, there to present him with all these announcements, well, it 's just ridiculous, the caliber is not the same, he is completely different, he distances himself in some sense from russia, therefore to make him this, so to speak, world villain, well, in general , there is no point, there is no game needed in this, but as a tool it is important, that's if.