russia boris elson, well, for example, in changing over the centuries, acquiring various state forms, but always remaining, if not totalitarian, then authoritarian certainly, why? under feudalism. that is, tsarist russia, this structure was not much different from other european monarchies, but over time, especially after the french revolution, the world changed, and russia remained time... in russia, for centuries, this was the idea of monarchism. the god-given monarch united all the peoples of the national state, while the differences between nationalities were erased, for all of them were not tatars, yakuts or russians, but subjects of god’s chosen ruler. an absolute monarch, such as the russian tsar, ruled the country autocratically for life, until the 20th century, when the monarchy ceased to exist. why is that? undoubtedly, if a person wants to survive and exist further on the planet, then this will lead him to try again and again to change the existing order of things , built on the law of the jungle, a victory for our historical opponents, who understood that it was impossib