, dissing i boris johnson during the very boris johnson _ boris johnson during the very boris johnsonwith lots of -a-s johnson type speech with lots of gags and — johnson type speech with lots of gags and the _ johnson type speech with lots of gags and the activists _ johnson type speech with lots of gags and the activists in - johnson type speech with lots of gags and the activists in the - johnson type speech with lots of. gags and the activists in the room toved _ gags and the activists in the room loved it— gags and the activists in the room loved it and — gags and the activists in the room loved it and were _ gags and the activists in the room loved it and were weeping - gags and the activists in the room loved it and were weeping and - loved it and were weeping and sharing — loved it and were weeping and sharing of— loved it and were weeping and sharing of the _ loved it and were weeping and sharing of the rest _ loved it and were weeping and sharing of the rest of- loved it and were weeping and sharing of the rest of it, - loved it and were weeping and sharing of the rest of it

the only two prime ministers elected in the elections were only cameron and boris johnson.e really see such a situation, of course, that it probably does not affect aid to ukraine, because the position of both the labor party and the conservatives... regarding ukraine is almost the same, but still, interesting elections and interesting results, how they will affect in general, on great britain, on the european union, relations with the european union of great britain. well, if we are talking about ukraine, then do you share the opinion that there will be no change in great britain's policy towards ukraine, no change in great britain. there will be no question of ukraine, the ministers of the tsiniv government visited ukraine on several occasions, by the way, before all these elections, their position was always the same as the government's position, they always said that they accept this joint position, and it seems to me that these are absolutely obvious things, the importance of the british elections is not in ukrainian support, but in the role of great britain. because i

you can see, from love to hatred of boris johnson one step.ian kir starmer is just very, you know, he is such a poor politician, but maybe such a politician just after. johnson is needed by great britain, he says that this is not a star personality, he is, i would say, a party bureaucrat, but on the other hand , problems need to be solved right away, how the khalibari government will solve it, we do not know, the last libertarian prem' er, tony blair was such a political star, in front of which even no boris johnson can be compared, but gordon brown, the successor to... blair was already such a party bureaucrat. well, we see, i rather a strawberry, by the way. we see that this did not save the conservatives, yes, in fact, from a whole series of wrong decisions. ah, we have a short break, and after that we will return with another important topic. let's talk about the united states of america, about the election, about the results of the debate again, and about the ratings. don't switch, see you soon. your place is waiting for you, the light is

luke tryll, can boris johnson _ say. thanks, nick. luke tryll, can boris johnson turning _ say. johnson turning up for- say. thanks, nick. luke tryll, can boris johnson turning up for the i borisjohnson turning up for the conservatives even though he is not on the same stage as rishi sunak make a difference in the last 24 hours of campaigning?- make a difference in the last 24 hours of campaigning? well, we know boris johnson — hours of campaigning? well, we know boris johnson isn't _ hours of campaigning? well, we know boris johnson isn't universally - boris johnson isn't universally popular, borisjohnson isn't universally popular, but what you do find in the polling and focus groups is that there are two groups where he has a particular appeal. they are disgruntled conservatives who are thinking about going to reform uk and some disgruntled conservatives who are thinking about not voting. that will have been who that message from borisjohnson was squarely aimed at, a group the conservatives really need to get back if they are to avoid those worst projections of catastrophic de

with the european union, these brexiteers kicked her out, and then boris johnson came and started toing, practically breaking the country at the knees. i know there that ukrainians love boris johnson very much, because he used the ukrainian theme to show off on all the television screens in europe, and understood that his support for ukraine, one might say, would give him the opportunity to stay in in the position of prime minister, which turned out to be the case, by the way, he bought himself a few months there with this one. by the way, i believe that it was sincere support, because you know, you can be an idiot in domestic politics, support brexit simply in order to have power, lie about your parties during the coronavirus, but at the same time sincerely hate the imperialist aggression of russia , why not, this does not contradict one another, i think that boris johnson was absolutely sincere in his support for ukraine, it happens. in politics, politics is not no, no a one-wheeled thing, this is a multi-wheeled thing, and as a result, what we have at the end of this whole adventu

and random people came to power who were just opportunists, boris johnson, lis tras, rechisunok, whom no one in particular has ever heard of, and many other names that can be named, now their names do not matter, because all these people, all these let's applaud them, they found themselves in a non-british parliament, and where, some, like boris... johnson forever with a tarnished reputation as a well-deserved liar of great britain and the surrounding area, but this whole story with the exit harmed the british economy. now, when we look at the table of the situation in the british economy in in various fields of economy, social life, medicine, in everything. there are tens, and sometimes hundreds of percent changes everywhere. this is the level of crisis that margaret thatcher is said to have raised. great britain from the economic ruins, but there was no such thing as now, no such fall as now, in fact, even after boris johnson, theresa may came, who tried somehow to soften this story, to find some common language with the european union, these brexiteers kicked her out, and then bori

meanwhile, former prime minister of great britain boris johnson expressed confidence that if elected to... trump will be able to end the war in ukraine, he wrote about this in a column for the daily mail. before that, boris johnson personally met with trump during the republican convention in the united states. more about it let's talk with bohdan tsyupan, our correspondent in london. bohdan, i congratulate you. bohdan, so in what role did boris johnson enter this column now and what weight do his words have when he talks about trump's position? ostape, we can say that boris johnson is now our colleague with a stretch , of course. because he started his career as a journalist and now actually writes a weekly column for at least this leading mass-circulation british newspaper, but he's not ordinary because in between he's been mayor of london, he's been a conservative mp party in the parliament, and then a minister, in particular the minister of foreign affairs and the prime minister. minister of the country, that is, of course, that the track record here is huge, an important point i

and we saw how. irrelevant boris johnson was when he .ave irrelevant boris johnson was when he gave thatant boris johnson was when he gave that speech and there were about— gave that speech and there were about three people in the room. and liz truss_ about three people in the room. and liz truss is— about three people in the room. and liz truss is pretty much irrelevant in this_ liz truss is pretty much irrelevant in this country as well, rejected by her own_ in this country as well, rejected by her own constituents and may will go across _ her own constituents and may will go across the pond some validation. a quick across the pond some validation. quick point onjd vance and ukraine, while donald trump is president he did not listen to mike pence about foreign policy, he is not going to be swayed one way or the other and i think he wants to be unpredictable on ukraine and towards putin because he wants to show the world that he is not some putin show. {line he wants to show the world that he is not some putin show.— is not some putin show. one think mike pence _ is not some putin show.

and now we have a kind of peace plan from boris johnson, and ukrainians do not like it at all. i understand them very well among these people myself, when we read into this plan, we see the date 2022, this is actually the year in which the borders of the russian federation and ukraine should be arranged, if we were to sit down at the negotiating table, boris johnson thinks so. boris johnson also thinks yes with the help of donald trump will be able, with the help of donald. trump may, it will be possible to achieve some kind of peace between russia and ukraine, how sustainable, the question remains open for me, which i do not like very much, these are special protection measures for russian-speakers in ukraine. and so we are slowly entering into the discussion of the issue, again language, andriy, it seems to me that we are somehow walking with you, even in our spiral programs. the language question arises every time, and it would seem absolutely. various information reasons of political, criminogenic, as we shall continue to talk about irina farion, the kingdom of heaven, char

johnson, we had, and now we have a kind of peace plan from boris johnson, and the ukrainians do nothim at all, i understand them perfectly myself among these people. when we read this plan, then... we see the date 2022, this is actually the year the borders should be arranged between the russian federation and ukraine, if we were to sit down at the negotiating table, boris johnson thinks so. boris johnson also thinks that with the help of donald trump he can, with the help of donald trump maybe, it will be possible to achieve some kind of peace between russia and ukraine. how stable the question is remains open for me, which does not impress me at all special protection measures for russian speakers in ukraine. and so we are slowly entering into the discussion of the issue, again language, andriy, it seems to me that we are somehow walking with you even in our programs in a spiral. the language question arises every time and it would seem that there are completely different information reasons of political, criminogenic, how will we continue to talk about irina. farion kingdom of he

two elected prime ministers elected in the elections will be only cameron and boris johnson.uch a situation, of course, that it probably does not affect aid to ukraine, because the position of both labor and conservatives. it is almost the same in relation to ukraine, but still, interesting elections and interesting results, how they will affect, in general, the great britain, on... the european union in relations with the european union of great britain, well, if we are talking about ukraine, do you share the opinion that there will be no change in the policy of great britain regarding ukraine, no change in great britain regarding ukraine will be, the ministers of tinov's government visited ukraine several times, by the way, before all these elections, their position was always the same as the government's position, they always said that... that they accept this common position, and it seems to me that this absolutely obvious things, the importance of the british elections is not in ukrainian support, in the role of great britain, because i think that the role of great brita

boris johnson says what he's doing now boris johnson is reproducing the kremlin narratives, it soundsally from boris johnson, who... was written by a politician who is keen on churchill. so, the outstanding british prime minister of the second world war rightly noted that if between war and shame you choose shame, then you will get shame, war. johnson invites ukrainians to choose shame, or rather, not even that. johnson invites great britain, the usa, nato, the european union to the whole world to choose shame. this is an invitation not only to ukrainians to forget the main thing that they are defending in this war, territorial integrity and identity, but and putin, to stop this war, leaving behind the opportunity to start the next one. with the same goal: to capture another part of the territory, which they can then call their own, so there are no johnsons. in fact, boris johnson states that the issue of donbass, its occupied part, and the issue of crimea are being taken out of the equation. these are thoughts, questions, discussions with trump. but then what about anything about ukr

johnson must also be listened to, well, with a certain correction, because what boris johnson made public be called a brusylov breakthrough from boris johnson, because there are a lot of contradictory theses. starting with the thesis about the russian speakers, what threatens them, they, the russian speakers in ukraine are threatened only by russian aggression, this is the first, second, completely contradictory thesis that when the ukrainian army is well armed, it will go on borders 90 february 24, 22nd year, if the ukrainian army is well armed, it will go to the borders of the kuban and... and to the don and enter belgorod, so to speak, and an even more farcical thesis that amused me so much. and i always promote it, it is the thesis that ukrainian troops can replace american troops at american bases in europe, can you imagine, there is a romanian military base 80 km from the ukrainian border, and further on the border with lithuania polish the american base, which at one time was almost named ford trump, seems the poles wanted to do it that way, to name it, that is, isn't this thesis v

johnson must also be listened to with a certain correction, because what boris johnson made public canbrusylov's breakthrough . from boris johnson, because there are so many contradictory theses, starting with theses about russian-speakers, what threatens them, they, russian-speakers in ukraine are threatened only by russian aggression, this is the first, second, absolutely contradictory thesis that when you arm the ukrainian army well, it will go to the borders 90 february 24, 2022 . if the ukrainian army is well armed, it will go to the borders of the kuban and the nadon and enter voron and belgorod. therefore, it is worth saying, and an even more fun thesis, which pleased me so much, and i always promote it, is the thesis that ukrainian troops can replace american troops at american bases in europe. can you imagine, here... 80 km behind the dublin border, there is a romanian military base, and further on the border with lithuania, there is a polish, uh, american base, which at one time was almost called ford trump, it seems. the poles wanted to call it that, that is. isn't this thes

johnson in the daily mail, and there was a lot of discussion about what kind of plan boris johnson announced and... and it happened too , well, in fact, in these days, when zelenskyi was there, and zaluzhnyi was speaking, and sirsky’s interview was published, boris johnson made public his vision regarding the future of ukraine and the future, well, how should i say, russia’s victory, or semi-victory, because that , what he proposes, well, in principle, it includes a formula for some appeasement or pacification of putin, because he also talks about the fact that... should be in the big seven again, the big seven plus russia, that the russian language should somehow develop in ukraine in order to putin did not feel that he had lost, and there were some limits, not borders, the limits that were as of february 24, 2022, that they are, in principle , we can reach these limits, but before that, trump, as a presidential candidate the united states of america should give ukraine a lot of weapons for for ukraine to put putin before. the fact that either he agrees to some, well , appeasement, or they

this is that's fine. >> absolutely disagree with people , as boris johnson has people, as boris johnsonbut it's the language. it's the tone. it's the fact that these people, to me, they're role models. i don't want to see angela rayner dancing down the street in rainbow hotpants. >> i love that i watched that clip four times. >> i don't want to see that in my politicians. i want my child to grow up and think that politicians and grown ups do things in a grown up manner, not as potty mouthed teenagers. >> i think it's like for like and it will be very interesting if trump makes it to the white house, because let's just watch that biden space. and if david lammy is still foreign secretary, what comes of that relationship? >> it'll all be done through the us and our ambassador to the us. he'll be cut out anyway . thank he'll be cut out anyway. thank you to my panel coming up a royal first, as it's time to walk in the footsteps of the royal family. well. welcome back. we were talking about biden, trump, and lammy. and you were sending in your mail. moggs. david says trump will only speak to

johnson in the daily mail, and there was a lot of discussion about what kind of plan boris johnson had announced, and that happened. these days, when zelenskyi was there, and zaluzhnyi was speaking, and syrskyi's interview was published, boris johnson made public his vision regarding the future of ukraine and the future, well, how should i say, russia's victory, or semi-victory, because the fact that he offers, well, in principle, it is included in the formula of some appeasement or pacification of putin, because he also says that russia should be in a big shadow again. russia, that the russian language should somehow develop in ukraine so that putin does not feel that he has lost, and some limits, not borders, limits that were as of february 24, 2022, that in principle we can reach these limits, but before that, trump, as a candidate for the presidency of the united states of america, should give ukraine a lot of weapons in order for ukraine to confront putin with the fact that or he will agree. for some, well, appeasement, or they can open lendlease, and that's what mike pompeo wrote

johnson in the daily mail, and there was a lot of discussion about what kind of plan boris johnson announced, and this too it happened, well, in fact, during these days, when zelenskyi was there, and zaluzhnyi spoke, and syrskyi, the interview was published, boris johnson made his vision public that... to the future of ukraine and the future, well, how would i say, russia's victory, or half-victory, because what he proposes, well, it basically fits into the formula of some appeasement or pacification of putin, because he also says that russia should once again be in a great the seven, the big seven plus russia, that the russian language must somehow develop in ukraine so that putin does not feel that he has lost, and some borders are not the borders that were as of february 24 , 2022, that they are, in principle, we can reach these limits, but before that trump, how candidate for the presidency of the united states of america, should give ukraine a lot of weapons in order for ukraine to put putin in front of the fact that either he agrees to some kind of appeasement, or they can open a lendl

for some reason, it seems to me that boris johnson, who is credited, we still do not fully know, theed the capitulation in istanbul, then he should be offered to ukraine that a mile, let's give up what was as of february 24, 22 -th year, well, well, it's just illogical, nizak. point of view, the russian language is even more so, well, that is, it seems to me, or it is just such a throw-in, and the fact that, well, the ukrainians will not agree to this, but maybe the idea is that they say, let's try it in this is a way to drag russia into negotiations, and then we will see what will come out of it, especially since britain is now the most powerful partner that provides weapons, that actually helps... demilitarize crimea, the loss of crimea, we have already talked about it more than once, this is the beginning bad processes for putin further, that is , such an option is possible, but you know, mr. serhiy, i think that, well, now there is another column by pompeo, ex- secretary of state, another plan, trump is already there, destroying putin to zero, everything is already on the way to

don't reform boris johnson . yes, don't reform boris johnson. yes, he's still around. blames the pied piper, nigel farage for role in destruction of the tories as he warns the tories to avoid merging with reform as he offers advice on how to fix the party. is he right, offers advice on how to fix the party. is he right , though, and party. is he right, though, and away from the election? it's coming home. i'm not singing. i don't tell you that much . don't tell you that much. england must improve if they are to win the first european championship and things are starting to get serious in the quarterfinals. and the question that we want to know is, is it coming . that we want to know is, is it coming. home? but this show is nothing without you. and your views, especially this weekend. ihope views, especially this weekend. i hope you're having a fantastic one. so let me know your thoughts on all the stories we're discussing. the chances of england by visiting gbnews.com forward slash and your say and join the conversation or message me on our socials. we're @gbnews. but

this is that's fine. >> absolutely disagree with people , as boris johnson has people, as boris johnsonbut it's the language. it's the tone. it's the fact that these people, to me, they're role models. i don't want to see angela rayner dancing down the street in rainbow hotpants. >> i love that i watched that clip four times. >> i don't want to see that in my politicians. i want my child to grow up and think that politicians and grown ups do things in a grown up manner, not as potty mouthed teenagers. >> i think it's like for like and it will be very interesting if trump makes it to the white house, because let's just watch that biden space. and if david lammy is still foreign secretary, what comes of that relationship? >> it'll all be done through the us and our ambassador to the us. he'll be cut out anyway . thank he'll be cut out anyway. thank you to my panel coming up a royal first, as it's time to walk in the footsteps of the royal family. well. welcome back. we were talking about biden, trump, and lammy. and you were sending in your mail. moggs. david says trump will only speak to

johnson, and now we have a kind of peace plan from boris johnson, and ukrainians do not like him at all, i understand them perfectly myself among these people. when we read this plan, we see the date... the 22nd year is actually the year in which the borders of the russian federation and ukraine should have been arranged, if we were seated at the table negotiations, so boris johnson thinks. boris johnson also thinks that with the help of donald trump, with the help of donald trump , it may be possible to achieve some kind of peace between russia and ukraine. how stable. that question remains open for me, which does not impress me at all, these are special protection measures for russian-speakers in ukraine. and so we are slowly entering into the discussion of the issue of language again, andrei, it seems to me that we are somehow walking with you, even in our spiral programs. the language question arises every time, and seemingly completely different information reasons. political, criminogenic, as we will continue to talk about iryna farion, the kingdom of heaven. character, all th

the same applies to boris johnson, between trump and johnson, despite certain conflicts that existed them, there have always been, there was some kind of understanding, it is... true, it must be said clearly, and absolutely logical it is a fact that politicians on the right of the conservative camp are now fighting for the ears of donald trump, some of them sing to him one thing, others another, and boris johnson, whose position on the russian-ukrainian war is significantly different from the position of, say, viktor orban, who recently met with donald trump, tried to discuss with him precisely his vision , which is completely opposite to orban's, and by the way, why don't you think that the very possibility of a conversation between. and trump, could somehow be related to the conversation between johnson and trump. maybe boris johnson could be the one who finally convinced donald trump to talk to the president of ukraine and say what trump said. here, after the meeting with trump, johnson said that trump will resolutely support ukraine. and now we heard some similar words from trump

vladimir, this week is the author's column of the former prime minister of great britain, boris johnsony mail, after meeting with trump, and johnson's vision, whether it perhaps a shared vision between johnson and trump. well, rather, probably johnson, which he presented to trump as a candidate for the presidency of the united states of america, and there are a lot of contradictory points of what boris johnson writes about, well, let's say this, boris johnson is a great friend of ukraine, he has done a lot and we they are grateful to him, but there are points about these limits, well , not about borders, he spoke, but about the limits of the state on february 20, 24, 2022, bowing to putin regarding the russian language, and also that putin can return to the big eight, i.e. without russia is the big seven, seven plus russia, and here's how you assess, is this the game of boris johnson himself, or is it donald trump's game, johnson is just voicing it now, well, here i think of two points, mr. sergey, you know , in any negotiations you need to... show a potential partner the whip, but at t

the plan that was announced by boris johnson, one and to be one of the drafts of the future peace agreementich will be rejected, because we understand that there is a peace plan of zelenskyi, three points of which were discussed at the first peace summit, seven points were lost somewhere, and now zelenskyi is talking about what we have there will be a new peace plan by the end of the year, but he says it will be by november, and he doesn't say, so what? will be the basis of this plan, because if the basis of this plan is that you withdraw the troops first, and then we will talk about peace, then it is clear that no one will come to this summit, it is also understandable, i would like to have such troubles, he says, i was at a security conference in may, there was also a representative of the servants of the people, uh, and i asked such uncomfortable questions, well, towards the authorities, yes, which i think ... that the allies are not voicing on camera, they say to volodymyr zelensky, okay, volodymyr oleksandrovich, if even you, well, a miracle will happen, and you went to the borders in

the same applies to boris johnson.mp and johnson, despite certain conflicts that existed between them, there have always been, there was some kind of understanding, this is also true, it must be clearly stated, and the fact that the politicians on the right of the conservative camp are now fighting for the ears of donald trump is absolutely logical . some sing to him one thing in these ears, others something else. and boris johnson, whose position. significantly differs in the russian-ukrainian war from the position of, say, viktor orbán, who recently met with donald trump and tried to discuss with him precisely his vision , which is completely opposite to orbán's. and by the way, why don't you think that the very possibility of a conversation between zelensky and trump could somehow be related to the conversation between johnson and trump. maybe boris johnson could be the one who finally convinced donald trump to talk to the president of ukraine and say what trump said. this is after the meeting with trump. johnson ta

johnson write about, well, let's say this, boris johnson is a great friend of ukraine, he has done alot and we are grateful to him, but there are points about these borders, well, not about borders, he was talking about the borders of the state for 20, february 24, 2022, curtseys to putin regarding the russian language, and also that putin can return to the big eight, that is, without... from russia - it's the big seven, the seven plus russia, and that's how you judge, it's the game of himself boris johnson, is it donald trump's game after all , now johnson is voicing it, well, here i am i think there are two points, mr. serhiu, you know, in any negotiations you have to show a potential partner the stick, but at the same time show the carrot, which can... encourage him to at least start talking, and then we'll see. for some reason, it seems to me that, well, boris johnson, to whom it is attributed, we still do not fully know. the fact that he stopped the capitulation in istanbul, then to offer him to ukraine that we, you, let's give up what was as of february 24, 22, well, well, it's

and this phrase that boris johnson has is that the american contingent in europe should be replaced byrainian troops. and this is the answer to the question: what awaits europe, because the ukrainian armed forces are the only armed forces, as boris johnson writes, on the continent, capable of resisting the russian new wave. this must be remembered. the second thing is super important in this situation, which is obvious, despite the fact that london has left the european union, and london... will set the tone in security issues in the nato system, and here it is very important that there will be a key role play rutte. another important thing is what valery zaluzhny said in his speech, at this conference, that's what gentlemen, democrats, if we want to preserve democracy, wake up. today we have an understanding of what it means to fight evil. we can, we ask two things from you: the first is technology and help, because remember, i quote: neither ukraine nor russia, due to known reasons, are not able to do it, and the winner will be the one who provides a technological leap. it is not nec

johnson in the daily mail, and there was a great deal of discussion about what plan boris johnson had announced, and that too, well, in fact, these days, when zelenskyi was there, and zaluzhnyi was speaking and syrskyi was speaking, the interview was going on, boris johnson made public his vision regarding the future of ukraine and the future, well, how would i say, its victory... or half-victory of russia, because what he proposes, well, in principle, it is included in the formula of some appeasement or pacification of putin, because he also says that russia should once again be in the big seven. the big seven plus russia, that the russian language must somehow develop in ukraine so that putin does not felt that he lost, well, some limits, not borders, the limits that were as of february 24 , 2022, that in principle we can reach these limits, but before that trump, as a candidate for the presidency of the united states of america , should give ukraine a lot of weapons in order for ukraine to confront putin with the fact that either he agrees. for some, well , appeasement, or they can

yes, boris johnson, who we have not seen — campaign?ot seen anything _ campaign? yes, boris johnson, who we have not seen anything from _ campaign? yes, boris johnson, who we have not seen anything from an - have not seen anything from an entire campaign save from the words that he writes every weekend in the mail, the conservatives have had a rally which you can see here in central london tonight. and there he is at the lectern, like back to the future, let's listen to what he had to say. if future, let's listen to what he had to sa . , ., future, let's listen to what he had tosa. ., ., , .,. to say. if you want to protect the economy and _ to say. if you want to protect the economy and democracy - to say. if you want to protect the economy and democracy and - to say. if you want to protect the l economy and democracy and keep to say. if you want to protect the - economy and democracy and keep this country— economy and democracy and keep this country strong approach by spending 2.5% country strong approach by spending 25% of— country s

~ , _ , johnson? worst being sacked by boris johnson, johnson? me another two years in justice and maybe we wouldn't have the problems we have now. inttni’e’iiii and maybe we wouldn't have the problems we have now. we'll never know, problems we have now. we'll never know. thanks _ problems we have now. we'll never know, thanks for _ problems we have now. we'll never know, thanks for being _ problems we have now. we'll never know, thanks for being with - problems we have now. we'll never know, thanks for being with us. - know, thanks for being with us. nicole jay pitts, thank you. nick, what have you been hearing about the conservative leadership contest? today we had a conservative shadow cabinet reshuffle, we have had one of those in some time. this had to happen because so many members of the former cabinet lost their seats. two people have decided to leave. david cameron has decided he wanted to go. he quite fancied being foreign secretary in the house of lords but not keen on being shadow foreign secretary. his place has been taken by his for

of the full-scale invasion on the 24th of february '22 , it came out in context meetings of boris johnsondonald trump, as a candidate for the presidency of the united states, and the discussion of the peace plan. regarding donald's peace plan trump, we must remember what he said before this meeting, and i will quote it. he said the following: i have a peace plan, i will present it to ukraine and i will present it to russia. if ukraine refuses this peace plan, then ukraine will lose. if russia refuses, then russia will lose. let's imagine this situation: donald trump, let's just imagine, he wins the us presidential elections, becomes the next us president and presents this peace plan. okay, well, ukraine can agree to it, why not, as an option the withdrawal of russian troops from all the territories they captured after february 24 , 2022. and the return to the status quo as of february 23, 2022 to those limits, and here the question arises: will russia agree to this? and this is the most interesting thing, russia, she will refuse. so, if russia abandons donald trump's peace plan, then who

johnson writes about, well, let's say this, boris johnson is a great friend of ukraine, he has donere grateful to him, but there are points about these limits, well he was not talking about borders, but about limits. on february 24, 2022, curtseys to putin regarding the russian language, and also that putin can return to the big eight, that is, without russia - it is the big seven, the seven plus russia, and how do you assess, is this a game of boris johnson himself, or is that all - this is donald trump's game, just voicing it now? well, here i think of two points, mr. sergey, well, you know, in any negotiations, you have to show a potential partner the batik, but at the same time , show the carrot, well, which can encourage him to at least start talking, and there they say let's see for some reason, it seems to me that, well, boris johnson, to whom it is attributed, we still do not fully know what he stopped. capitulation in istanbul, then to offer him to ukraine that a mile, let's give up what was as of february 24, 22, well, it's simply illogical from any point of view, especial

volodymyr, this week is the author's column of the former british prime minister boris johnson in thefter meeting with trump, and johnson's vision, whether it is possible to share vision johnson and trump, well, rather probably johnson, which he presented to trump as a candidate for the presidency of the united states of america, and there are a lot of contradictory points of what boris johnson writes about, well, let's say this, boris johnson is a great friend of ukraine, he he did a lot and we are grateful to him, but there are points about these limits, well, not about borders, he spoke, but about the limits of the state on february 20, 2022. curtseys to putin regarding the russian language, and also that putin can return to the g8, that is, without russia this is the big seven, seven plus russia, and how do you assess, is this the game of boris johnson himself, or is it donald trump’s game after all, johnson is just voicing it now, well, there seem to me two points here, mr. serhiu, you know, in anyway... in these negotiations, you have to show the potential partner the whip, but

boris johnson asked the don.in the fbi, what does this mean, what do they want to find out if he is crazy, a loner, well, in general, the case is closed? olga, hello, indeed mike johnson announced today the creation of a task force to investigate the attempted assassination of the ex-president, first of all they want to understand this quote, the shocking security failures on the part of the secret service, which was supposed to protect trump. but for now, republicans are trying to figure it out. what happened why did this happen, let me remind you that the shooter was only 100-140 m from the place of the former president’s speech in the united states, they have already found the culprits in all possible future cases. attempts on trump's life, through leaks to the american press, intelligence reports that iran is allegedly preparing assassination attempts on the former president, possibly on the future president, which, if you believe, again, the american media, will happen more and more often in the coming weeks

correction, because what boris johnson made public can be called a brusylov breakthrough from boris johnson, because there are a lot of mutually contradictory theses, starting with the thesis about the russian speakers, what they are in danger of, they, the russian speakers in ukraine are only threatened by russian aggression, this firstly, secondly, a completely contradictory thesis that when the ukrainian army is well armed, it will go to the borders of 90 february 24, 22, if the ukrainian army is well armed, it will go to the borders of the kuban and its territory and enter in voronezh to belgorod, so to speak, and an even more weighty thesis, which pleased me so much, and i always promote it, is... that ukrainian troops can replace american troops at american bases in europe, can you imagine, here under ee 80 km from the ukrainian border, er, there is a romanian military base, further on the border with lithuania there is a polish, american base, which at one time was almost on... named ford trump, it seems that the poles wanted to do it that way , to name, that is, is this thesis very

the same applies to boris johnson. between trump and johnson, despite certain conflicts that existed between them, have always existed, there was a certain understanding. it is also true, it must be said clearly, and it is absolutely logical that politicians from the right-conservative camp are now fighting for donald trump's ears. some sing to him one thing in these ears, others another. and johnson, whose position on the russian-ukrainian war is significantly different from the position of, say, viktor orbán, who recently met with donald trump, tried to discuss his a vision completely opposite to that of orbanovsky, and by the way, why don't you think that the very possibility of a conversation between zelenskyi and trump could somehow be related to the conversation between johnson and trump. maybe boris johnson could be the one who finally convinced donald trump to talk to the president of ukraine and say what trump said. here is after. meeting with trump, johnson said that trump will resolutely support ukraine, and

johnson, you can call brusylov's breakthrough. from boris johnson, because there are a lot of contradictorytheses, starting with the thesis about the russian speakers, what they are in danger of, they, the russian speakers in ukraine are only threatened by russian aggression, this is the first, second, absolutely contradictory thesis that when it is good to arm the ukrainian army, then it will go to the borders of 90 on february 24, 22nd year. "if it is good to arm the ukrainian army, then it will go to the borders of the kuban and the nadon and enter boronigi in belgorod, so to speak, and also a more complete thesis, which pleased me so much, and i always promote it, is a thesis.

regarding boris johnson, in fact tetiana danylenko, a journalist, we thank her, very aptly wrote: two years before the great war, the son of a russian oligarch, ex- kgb officer, owner of the evening standard and the independent, oleksandr lebedev, yevgeny entered the british house of lords. the queen gave him the whimsical and ridiculous title of baron lebedev of hampton in the london borough of richmond ponthams and siberia in the russian federation. by the servant of the swan. the youngest before the crown was charity in the amount of 75 million pounds, the son of a russian oligarch together with boris johnson used these funds to help veterans, rhinos, and elephants. johnson lebedov have been friends for many years and have fun at parties. and you say, our friend johnson is shocked by his peace plan and the surrender of ukraine. tell me whom you have made an english lord, and i will tell you who you are. there will be many peaceful plans, get ready, and they will all be about one thing. let's quickly surrender ukraine to the russians before the big one. war with china. we will remin

it was under boris johnson. us remember that we saw immigration go remember that we saw immigration 9° up remember that we saw immigration go up to three quarters of a million net migration. we saw the state expand to a level which we have not seen due to the pandemic, and we didn't get back to pre—pandemic levels . so back to pre—pandemic levels. so the man that you wanted to stay in power did not govern as conservative. >> boris johnson . the main flow >> boris johnson. the main flow of migration in his last period of migration in his last period of office was from hong kong and from ukraine, which is a fundamentally conservative thing to support people who in hong kong were british citizens are people and people in ukraine who were suffering from a war. so that was actually something that was the result of historic events. >> and as you defend the conservatives record on immigration, i think we made one mistake, which was an important one, and that is it was thought that after the, covid restrictions , the em

it was under boris johnson.s remember that we saw immigration go remember that we saw immigration 9° up remember that we saw immigration go up to three quarters of a million net migration. we saw the state expand to a level which we have not seen due to the pandemic, and we didn't get back to pre—pandemic levels . so back to pre—pandemic levels. so the man that you wanted to stay in power did not govern as conservative. >> boris johnson . the main flow >> boris johnson. the main flow of migration in his last period of migration in his last period of office was from hong kong and from ukraine, which is a fundamentally conservative thing to support people who in hong kong were british citizens are people and people in ukraine who were suffering from a war. so that was actually something that was the result of historic events. >> and as you defend the conservatives record on immigration, i think we made one mistake, which was an important one, and that is it was thought that after the, covid restrictions , the empl

from my point of view, to date, including what mr kuleba has done, what boris johnson has done, the famous articles, what robert o'brien has done in the famous article, these are the so-called pro. stones, right away, mr. antin, i want to say that they are not worth paying attention to, because it will not be possible to launch any negotiation process under the current conditions, not because they do not want this in washington, brussels, beijing, but it will not happen for the simple reason that moscow considers any negotiation process as a trap, and not only for ukraine, but also for those who today... speak most about it , and this makes it clear, in my article i am already cursed and already completely in quotation marks i take these words: boris jonsonyuk is not a hero, because what he writes there is clearly visible, you can think anything you want, but there is only one way to put the führer in place is by force. i agree with you mr. roman, well, look, there are two more very important signals here, one signal came, as it were... from the kremlin, that is, they reacted immediately l

the same applies to boris johnson, between trump and johnson, despite certain the conflicts that existed between them have always existed, there was some kind of understanding, this is also true, it must be said clearly, and absolutely... the fact that politicians on the right of the conservative camp are now fighting for the ears of donald trump is logical. some sheep's ears hum one thing to him, another another. and boris johnson, whose position on the russian-ukrainian war is significantly different from the position of, say, viktor orban, who recently met with donald trump, tried to discuss with him precisely his vision, which is completely opposite to orban's. and by the way, why you? do not think that the very possibility of a conversation between zelenskyi and trump could be connected in one way or another. with the conversation between johnson and trump, could boris johnson be the one who finally convinced donald trump to talk to the president of ukraine and say what trump said? after the meeting with trump, johnson said that trump will resolutely support ukraine, and now we hear

kuleba has done, what boris johnson has done, the famous article, what was done by robert o'brien in the famous article, these are the so-called touchstones, right away, mr. antin, i want to say, they are not worth considering. because it will not be possible to start any negotiation process in the current conditions, not because washington, brussels, beijing do not want it, but it will not happen for the simple reason that moscow considers any negotiation process as a trap, and not only for of ukraine, but also for those who talk about it the most today, and this clearly makes it clear... in his article he is already cursed and already completely in quotation marks i take these words not as a hero, boris johnsonyuk, because what he writes there is clearly visible, you can think anything you want, but there is only one way to put the führer in his place, that is force. i agree with you, mr. roman, well, look, there are two more very important signals here, one signal came, strangely enough, from the kremlin, that is, they immediately reacted like this to the meeting. were not invited

kuleba did, what boris johnson did, the famous article, what robert o'brien did in the famous articleese are the so-called touchstones. right away, mr. antin, i want to say that they are not worth paying attention to, because it will not be possible to start any negotiation process in the current conditions with... not because of the fact that this do not want in washington, brussels, beijing, but this will not happen for the simple reason that moscow considers any negotiation process as a trap, and not only for ukraine, but also for those who are talking about it the most today, and this clearly makes it clear, in his article he is already cursed and already completely in quotation marks i take these words not... the hero boris johnsonyuk, because what he writes there is clearly visible, you can think anything, but there is only one a way to put the führer in his place. this is power. i agree with you, mr. roman. well, look, there are two more very important signals. one signal came, not surprisingly, from the kremlin. that is, they immediately reacted like this, to the meeting of ku

regarding boris johnson, actually tetiana danylenko, a journalist, we thank her, very aptly wrote: two years before the great war, the son of a russian oligarch, ex-kgb officer, owner of the evening standard and the independent, oleksandr yevgeny lebedeva entered the british house of lords. the queen gave him a whimsical , ridiculous title: baron lebid of hampton in the london borough of richmond ponthams and siberia in the russian federation. the merit of lebidiv the younger before the crown was charity. in the amount of 75 million pounds, the son of a russian oligarch, together with boris johnson, used these funds to help veterans, rhinoceroses, elephants, johnson, lebedev have been friends for many years and have fun at parties, and you say, our friend johnson is shocked by his faithful plan and surrender of ukraine. tell me who you made an english lord, i will tell you who you are, there will be many peace plans, get ready, and they will all be about one thing: let's quickly surrender ukraine to the russians before the big war with china. we would like to remind you that a ukrainia

and this phrase that boris johnson has in that... because the american contingent in europe should beed by ukrainian troops is an answer to the question of what awaits europe, because the ukrainian armed forces are the only armed forces on the continent , as boris johnson writes , which are capable of resisting the russian novela. this must be remembered. the second thing that is super important in this situation, which is obvious, despite the fact that london has left... line up of the european union, london will set the tone in security issues in the nato system, and here it is very important that there will be a key role... another important thing is what valery zaluzhny said in his speech at this conference, that , that gentlemen, democrats, if we want to preserve democracy, wake up, we have today an understanding of what it is to fight evil, we know how, we ask two things from you, the first is technology and help, because... remember, i quote: neither ukraine nor russia, due to known reasons, are capable of doing this, and the winner will be the one who provides a technological

and this phrase that boris johnson has is that...can the contingent in europe should be replaced by ukrainian troops - this is the answer to the question that awaits europe, because the ukrainian armed forces are the only armed forces, as boris johnson writes, on the continent, capable of resisting the russian novals, this must be remembered. the second thing is super important in this situation, which is obvious, despite the fact that london has left the european union, and london will set the tone in security issues in the nato system. and here it is very important that rütte will play a key role there. one more the most important thing is what valery zaluzhny said in his speech at this conference, it is what gentlemen...

, as you can see, from love to hate one step to boris johnson. the politician keir starmer is just very, you know, like that, he is a poor politician, but maybe he is the kind of politician, just after boris johnson, that great britain needs, that he is a non-star personality. such, i would say, a party bureaucrat, but on the other hand, it is necessary to decide right away problems, like me, when the boris government will solve, we don't know, the last liberal prime ministers, tony blair was such a political star, in front of which even no boris johnson can be compared, but gordon brown, tony blair's successor, already there was such a party bureaucrat, well we see, i'm a bit of a snob, by the way we... we see that it didn't save the conservatives, yes, actually, from a whole series of wrong decisions, we have a short break, and after that... we'll be back another important topic, let's talk about the united states of america, about elections, about re- about the consequences of the debate and about the ratings, don't switch, see you soon. tingl

first of all, how much, influence do you think boris johnson has with president trump ?an't, president trump? now, i can't, unfortunately hear a word. owen is saying. so i don't know whether that's a problem with me or whether that's a problem more generally, but it is a really important subject, because if you think back to the beginning of the ukraine war, when boris johnson really led the world in coming to the aid of ukraine, he was the first to say that we should support ukraine. he managed to get the support of joe biden and then the europeans reluctantly bear in mind the minsk agreements in 2014 came in and supported ukraine, and that the expectation that the soviet union, russia, as it now is, would simply run over. ukraine was stopped in part because of suppues was stopped in part because of supplies of anti—tank weapons that were delivered by the british against some official advice. but thanks to ben wallace and boris johnson, the ability to stand up to russia began to take form. the rest of the world came in and we know what's happened. since that, though the