0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
KPIX
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
just as can deonte brown jackson focused on the amendments specific justice ketanji brown jackson focus on the specific words, that trump could prevail, suggesting the provision just after the civil war clearly did not apply to presidents. >> they were listing people that was barred and president was not there. and so there is an ambiguity, why would we construe it against democracy? >> reporter: the justices also were troubled by the potential impact of a colorado decision and how it could be weaponized by both sides. >> i would expect that a goodly number of states will say, whoever the democratic candidate is, you are off the ballot, and others, for the republican candidate, you are off the ballot. and it will come down to just a handful of states that are going to decide the presidential election. that's a pretty daunting consequence. >> reporter: people camped out overnight for up to two days to get a seat inside, but trump did not attend. >> i'm a believer in our country and i'm a believer in the supreme court. i listened today, and thought our arguments were very, very strong. >>
just as can deonte brown jackson focused on the amendments specific justice ketanji brown jackson focus on the specific words, that trump could prevail, suggesting the provision just after the civil war clearly did not apply to presidents. >> they were listing people that was barred and president was not there. and so there is an ambiguity, why would we construe it against democracy? >> reporter: the justices also were troubled by the potential impact of a colorado decision and how...
0
0.0
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
even though trump himself describes the day as beautiful, justice kentanji brown jackson got trump's lawyer to acknowledge the reality of what happened. >> but for an insurrection there needs to be an organized, concerted effort to overthrow the government of the united states through violence. and this riot that occurred -- >> so the point is a chaotic effort to overthrow the government is not an insurrection? >> we didn't concede that it's an effort to overthrow the government either, justice jackson. none of these criteria were met. this was a riot. it was not an insurrection. the events were shameful, criminal, violent, all those things. but didn't qualify as an insurrection as that term is used in section three. >> reporter: a decision in this case is expected sooner rather than later. it's a case about the presidential ballot in colorado, and the presidential primary in that state is march 5th. so, we should expect a decision
even though trump himself describes the day as beautiful, justice kentanji brown jackson got trump's lawyer to acknowledge the reality of what happened. >> but for an insurrection there needs to be an organized, concerted effort to overthrow the government of the united states through violence. and this riot that occurred -- >> so the point is a chaotic effort to overthrow the government is not an insurrection? >> we didn't concede that it's an effort to overthrow the...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
we can't act scared. >> but congressman, a lot was said with justice kagan from ketanji brown jacksonjustice thomas about the idea of colorado as one state. it's the other voters and other states to elect a candidate of their choosing. what do you met -- hagan called it nationalistic proposition, this state is ahead of its own skis on the behalf of the nation. >> i disagree profoundly with that, if that's what they were saying, certainly posing that question. it would be better for the supreme court to pronounce this. i agree, it we should have some clarity on it. we don't have a repeat of january 6th, 2021 and january 6th, 2025 on the floor of the house of representatives. having said that, what they are describing that this uniformity as a consequence of this system of federalism. some states allow former prisoners to vote. most states do, but some don't. the states like florida, which has been the legislatures been struggling to keep former prisoners from voting. they are affecting ultimately who is going to become president. >> congressman, from a quick note, you are going to say
we can't act scared. >> but congressman, a lot was said with justice kagan from ketanji brown jacksonjustice thomas about the idea of colorado as one state. it's the other voters and other states to elect a candidate of their choosing. what do you met -- hagan called it nationalistic proposition, this state is ahead of its own skis on the behalf of the nation. >> i disagree profoundly with that, if that's what they were saying, certainly posing that question. it would be better for...
0
0.0
Feb 10, 2024
02/24
by
LINKTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
amy: i also want to ask about the line of questioning of justice contagion brown jackson -- ketanji brownckson and the whole issue of what it means to be an officer in the 14th amendment. also talk about the history of this case, why colorado going back to the civil war, what it means for an insurrectionist to run for office. >> this is a double-edged sword of justice jackson. she is fantastic, amazingly smart. and she is an originalist, a liberal version of those words. but she is the person who kind of goes toe to toe with neil gorsuch whenever they want to talk about the original public in of this or that. she is the one who goes right in to the oxford english dictionary to fight gorsuch about the definition of what "is" is. and that is great most of the time. but yesterday, those -- that intellectual consistency led her to what i think is a quite tortured place where she was parsing the word "office" versus "offices" to try to find some way to not include president trump. the problem is it is ridiculous. it is ridiculous as a matter of common sense to think the people who said that yo
amy: i also want to ask about the line of questioning of justice contagion brown jackson -- ketanji brownckson and the whole issue of what it means to be an officer in the 14th amendment. also talk about the history of this case, why colorado going back to the civil war, what it means for an insurrectionist to run for office. >> this is a double-edged sword of justice jackson. she is fantastic, amazingly smart. and she is an originalist, a liberal version of those words. but she is the...
0
0.0
Feb 19, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
we have ketanji brown jackson. this is one of the ministrations that has have one of the most diverse administrations in my lifetime. we have our first black woman as vice president. we also have to get down to how does this make you feel? if i don't feel we are doing well then we have to address that. some of that is sharing what you have done but also share what you haven't done in a way that people say, this is going to be my choice because they are fighting for me. host: you mentioned black women in leadership roles. there is an article here in the 19th news, saying for the first time, black women are leading democrats in early primary states. the women serve as the public face of the democrat party in south carolina, nevada and michigan. i wonder what you think the idea -- do you think that the democrat party leadership and its apparatus are reflective of the prominent black women who are at the grassroots in the united states, organizing for democrats? guest: i think georgia has a black woman too. i think you
we have ketanji brown jackson. this is one of the ministrations that has have one of the most diverse administrations in my lifetime. we have our first black woman as vice president. we also have to get down to how does this make you feel? if i don't feel we are doing well then we have to address that. some of that is sharing what you have done but also share what you haven't done in a way that people say, this is going to be my choice because they are fighting for me. host: you mentioned black...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
yield like to refer to the fact we just heard about ketanji brown jackson. it's true she reiterated an argument the president made. andre i think this also speaks n justitute what the justices were thinking but the performance essentially ofhe the lawyer mr. murray who was representingaw t colorado voters. i would say we've all heard a lot of oral arguments. i don't know this was the most confident oral argument we've ever coheard, and it felt there wered times when all the justis including sanchez and kagen who he has clerked for were almost frustrated they weren't able to getle straight answers out of h, he at several points declined to answer the question that had been asked, wanting instead to answer something else. even in that exchange with jackson it was hard to tell whether or not that was something she truly believed or she felt this was not a great argument mades by the trump lawyers. if you listen to the argument with the trump lawyer, with mr. mitchell, it was clear amy coney barrett and others were saying this is a ridiculous argument, of course
yield like to refer to the fact we just heard about ketanji brown jackson. it's true she reiterated an argument the president made. andre i think this also speaks n justitute what the justices were thinking but the performance essentially ofhe the lawyer mr. murray who was representingaw t colorado voters. i would say we've all heard a lot of oral arguments. i don't know this was the most confident oral argument we've ever coheard, and it felt there wered times when all the justis including...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
particularly, justice ketanji brown jackson was very fixed on the history.ed it is something that you've been covering, and she had a very different take on one historical record of what she took away from that. she might have been wrong, but her view was very much that it would be ironic, and to be looking at this as someone who gives more rights when there was such a concern about the confederate insurrectionists burrowing into the states, that goes to the clip you played, it's and this essentially kavanaugh saying that there is a federal way out? which is that somebody could be charged as a federal insurrectionist after a congressional statute, doesn't that solve the question? unclear to me if they actually had done this extra charge that justice kavanaugh would be saying that. and it still doesn't, -- it doesn't totally answer the question because there is still an issue on whether that is constitutional. whether that really does come forward and is anti-democratic. so there is still that issue. many viewers might be asking why wasn't there that prosecut
particularly, justice ketanji brown jackson was very fixed on the history.ed it is something that you've been covering, and she had a very different take on one historical record of what she took away from that. she might have been wrong, but her view was very much that it would be ironic, and to be looking at this as someone who gives more rights when there was such a concern about the confederate insurrectionists burrowing into the states, that goes to the clip you played, it's and this...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
one justice, brown jackson, she did raise this issue at the very end of trump soils are arguments. let's take a listen. >> president trump did not engage in any act that could plausibly be characterizes insurrection. >> so why is this not an insurrection? >> your apply brief says that it wasn't because, i think you say, it did not involve an organized attempt to overthrow the government. >> that's one of the many reasons. for an insurrection there has to be an organized concerted effort to overthrow the government of united states through violence. -- >> so the point is that a chaotic effort is not an insurrection? >> it's an effort to throw the government either. none of the criteria it was met. this was a riot, it was not an insurrection. the events were saint shameful, criminal, violent, all those things. but it didn't qualify as insurrection as the term is used in section three. >> it's notable, she asked about it because she was a frontal trial judge. after the initial batch of arrest following january 6th, she oversaw some of those cases before she was elevated. she made it p
one justice, brown jackson, she did raise this issue at the very end of trump soils are arguments. let's take a listen. >> president trump did not engage in any act that could plausibly be characterizes insurrection. >> so why is this not an insurrection? >> your apply brief says that it wasn't because, i think you say, it did not involve an organized attempt to overthrow the government. >> that's one of the many reasons. for an insurrection there has to be an organized...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i want to give you a chance, how did you rebut that particular specific question from justice brown jackson. >> the main reason is it's so obviously included. the 14th amendment covers senators and representatives who aren't office holders in a technical/legal sense, and covers presidential electors, and then it covers anyone who holds any office under the united states. we all know the president holds an office. he swears an oath of office. the constitution calls the presidency the office of the president of the united states. the history is very clear people at the time knew that phrase referred to president. rebels like robert e. lee or jefferson davis, the head of the confederacy couldn't have any office, including the pre presidency, unless they got amnesty. historically speaking, that point was well understood. >> you obviously clerked, as you pointed out, the pride you felt for arguing in front of justices you clerked for. why one state should be making a decision for the country, right? the federalist question. justice kagan says, why should a single state have the the determination
i want to give you a chance, how did you rebut that particular specific question from justice brown jackson. >> the main reason is it's so obviously included. the 14th amendment covers senators and representatives who aren't office holders in a technical/legal sense, and covers presidential electors, and then it covers anyone who holds any office under the united states. we all know the president holds an office. he swears an oath of office. the constitution calls the presidency the...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jackson, justice ketanji brown jackson did get into this question of, why didn't the drafters of theude the president? i guess they did not have the lord imagination to understand any presidential candidates, you can be president can commit insurrection, so i did not specify. >> just a legal point, we are talking right now about the what, which is very important. most of the argument turned on the who, and one of the cases they talked about the most was the turmoil and a case, which is not a perfect case, by the way. >> can you say the name of the case, it's turmoil, not a case about turmoil. >> you're right. >> very frustrating. >> the supreme court has previously held that if you add something, even something that sounds reasonable like, we don't want people in congress forever, right? and we want to have a limit on the amount of, time they said that actually is adding and eligibility requirement, and you cannot do that. yes, the what is super important. indeed, i would argue that the split on the court is about the white, and we might see that by the way on the immunity case that
jackson, justice ketanji brown jackson did get into this question of, why didn't the drafters of theude the president? i guess they did not have the lord imagination to understand any presidential candidates, you can be president can commit insurrection, so i did not specify. >> just a legal point, we are talking right now about the what, which is very important. most of the argument turned on the who, and one of the cases they talked about the most was the turmoil and a case, which is...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
cerges can he tanky brown jackson. saying a lot and not in the state of colorado's favor it. did not go well for colorado. and i will think for good reason, bret this is what happens when an untested theory needs judicial reality. and i think the key votes are justice jackson and justice cag for different reasons talking about well is the president even covered by this clause in the 14th amendment and justice kagan pointed out that if we left up the qualification question to the states, the result would be chaos. it's a national question that deserves a national answer. i think we're looking at an 8-1 decision in donald trump's favor. >> bret: and some experts saying maybe 9-0 to try to, you know, john roberts would really push for that, the chief justice, bill. here is a little clip from the cag q&a. >> justice kagan: if they can put most boldly i think that the question you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the united states. >> bret: bill, thoughts? >> yeah, the supreme
cerges can he tanky brown jackson. saying a lot and not in the state of colorado's favor it. did not go well for colorado. and i will think for good reason, bret this is what happens when an untested theory needs judicial reality. and i think the key votes are justice jackson and justice cag for different reasons talking about well is the president even covered by this clause in the 14th amendment and justice kagan pointed out that if we left up the qualification question to the states, the...
0
0.0
Feb 20, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jackson, so many other people, so this was monumental for you to come in here and put delta on thisestal. we know for as long as we can remember of voting rights, democracy, lots of social issues have been on the plate and frankly it is what helps catalyze the president into his role, and was the work of deltas, afrin american women who helped him solidify this presidency was a what would you cite is the value of black women specifically in foreign policy and national security and how can we continue to elevate black women in the space? amb. jenkins: thank you. the bio needs to be updated. jalina: we have to put that on the bio. amb. jenkins: yeah, briefly, it was great. i was accepted as an honorary member of delta along with an illustrious line of other women, and it really did, it is great to be part of this wonderful organization. but you know, being around all these other you know, black women, i have had an opportunity to do a number of activities with delta, really doesn't still just the power of black women working together. i know that the deltas were also a strong proponen
jackson, so many other people, so this was monumental for you to come in here and put delta on thisestal. we know for as long as we can remember of voting rights, democracy, lots of social issues have been on the plate and frankly it is what helps catalyze the president into his role, and was the work of deltas, afrin american women who helped him solidify this presidency was a what would you cite is the value of black women specifically in foreign policy and national security and how can we...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice brown jackson asks a question at the end of the oral argument. she's asking, what happens if colorado loses this case? colorado has postured this as an issue about whether trump's ineligibility to hold the office of president means that he is not qualified to be on their ballot. let's say that the court rules he can't stay on the ballot. he has to continue to be removed from the ballot. let's say there's an election. donald trump is elected. does that mean that there's chaos following the election where congress then is scrambling, trying to decide whether or not he is eligible? does that get thrown into the courts? i don't think any of these justices want to end up in that position. i think we will see them search for a rationale that decides the situation once and for all. there's that possibility they might conclude that the issue of eligibility can't be decided in this moment because congress has yet to act. that's deeply concerning for the future of the country. >> joyce, i was struck by it. i will ask our production team to go to sot 10. i
justice brown jackson asks a question at the end of the oral argument. she's asking, what happens if colorado loses this case? colorado has postured this as an issue about whether trump's ineligibility to hold the office of president means that he is not qualified to be on their ballot. let's say that the court rules he can't stay on the ballot. he has to continue to be removed from the ballot. let's say there's an election. donald trump is elected. does that mean that there's chaos following...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but they all, besides ketanji brown jackson, sidestepped the question of did the former president, whilewas in office, effectively take up arms against his own country? that's the core question i think voters want to have an answer to. that's a question -- that's an issue that led jack smith to charge the former president and it is unfortunate that the supreme court looks like they're going to not weigh in on that at all, and instead sidestep it and likely do one of these off ramps here. >> i hadn't heard ketanji brown jackson, who is in a supreme court setting asking questions, i thought she was particularly pointed toward history. that's interesting, because who you are and your sensitivities in life kind of help you become who you are and how you ask questions in a moment like this. it was interesting to see how she was very carefully focusing on history. >> she has done this in other oral arguments. historically, it is a conservative side of the bench that has to be focused on what people thought historically, what the founding fathers thought, and really looking backwards. but she h
but they all, besides ketanji brown jackson, sidestepped the question of did the former president, whilewas in office, effectively take up arms against his own country? that's the core question i think voters want to have an answer to. that's a question -- that's an issue that led jack smith to charge the former president and it is unfortunate that the supreme court looks like they're going to not weigh in on that at all, and instead sidestep it and likely do one of these off ramps here....
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
everyone assumes they meant that book a ton g brown jackson picked that up today -- but ketanji brownked that up today. >> why did they not put the word president in the list? the thing that is troubling to me is i totally understand your argument but they were listing people that were barred and president is not there. >> this came up in the debates in congress over section three where they said why didn't you include president and vice president in a language and center more response, we have. look at the office any office says. >> doesn't that at least suggest ambiguity? this ties into justice kavanaugh's point. we had a person at the time saying what i am saying. the language here does not seem to include president. why is that? so if there is ambiguity, why would we construe it to come as justice kavanaugh pointed out, against democracy? amna: it is fascinating, the language at play here. did they ever address that central point, that january 6 was an insurrection that donald trump was responsible for? william: you would have thought that would be a central line of questioning bu
everyone assumes they meant that book a ton g brown jackson picked that up today -- but ketanji brownked that up today. >> why did they not put the word president in the list? the thing that is troubling to me is i totally understand your argument but they were listing people that were barred and president is not there. >> this came up in the debates in congress over section three where they said why didn't you include president and vice president in a language and center more...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice ketanji brown jackson focused on the amendment's specific words as another reason trump could prevail, suggesting the provision passed after the civil war didn't clearly apply to presidents. >> they were listing people that were barred, and president is not there. so if there's an ambiguity, why would we construe it against democracy? >> reporter: the justices also were troubled by the potential impact of the colorado decision and how it could be weaponized by both sides. >> i would expect that a goodly number of states will say whoever the democratic candidate is, you're off the ballot, and others for the republican candidate, you're off the ballot. it will come down to just a handful of states that are going to decide the presidential election. that's a pretty daunting consequence. >> reporter: people camped out overnight for up to two days to get a seat inside, but trump did not attend. >> i'm a believer in our country, and i'm a believer in the supreme court. i listened today, and i thought our arguments were very strong. >> reporter: now normally with a case this momentou
justice ketanji brown jackson focused on the amendment's specific words as another reason trump could prevail, suggesting the provision passed after the civil war didn't clearly apply to presidents. >> they were listing people that were barred, and president is not there. so if there's an ambiguity, why would we construe it against democracy? >> reporter: the justices also were troubled by the potential impact of the colorado decision and how it could be weaponized by both sides....
0
0.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
take a listen to justice ketanji brown jackson on this point. >> i guess i need a reason why there's so much worse about a situation in which you push it forward rather than pull it back that we can reasonably say that that was a particular category that congress wanted to prohibit? and that's what i'm missing in your argument. it doesn't make sense to me that we're going to identify guns on that purpose and say those are the ones that are prohibited when others that achieve the same result are not. >> it's because the statute was written in 1934 and congress wasn't thinking about bump stocks. >> that's the issue. can this 1934 law cover this device that wasn't even conceived back then, chris, and we'll have to wait and see. >> ken dilanian, thank you. >>> joining me now is chris brown, president of brady united against gun violence. let me go back to where all of this began because that's the person who brought this case. you were in vegas after the attack. you have talked about the damage done in just ten minutes. put it in perspective what it meant that this ar-15 had a bump stock
take a listen to justice ketanji brown jackson on this point. >> i guess i need a reason why there's so much worse about a situation in which you push it forward rather than pull it back that we can reasonably say that that was a particular category that congress wanted to prohibit? and that's what i'm missing in your argument. it doesn't make sense to me that we're going to identify guns on that purpose and say those are the ones that are prohibited when others that achieve the same...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it was asked by justice ketanji brown jackson to the presidents lawyer. what is likelihood after listening to more than two hours today, this oral argument, that the former president remains disqualified on the primary ballot in colorado? guest: the likelihood that he remains disqualified is quite low. i certainly agree, and most of my reporter colleagues and others who watched his or listen to it on the live stream agree that that's not where the court is going, and it may well be unanimous, it may well be lopsided, but that is not the direction the court is headed. they will, in some way or another, overturn this colorado supreme court decision. host: how soon could the court make a decision? guest: that's a good question. this case is been compared to bush versus gore, that was the 2000 presidential election. it was close and came down to florida. the court took a wild before it got involved, but then decided it needed to result -- resolve the theme pretty quickly. heard arguments one day. it did hear arguments in the separate site issue first. but whe
it was asked by justice ketanji brown jackson to the presidents lawyer. what is likelihood after listening to more than two hours today, this oral argument, that the former president remains disqualified on the primary ballot in colorado? guest: the likelihood that he remains disqualified is quite low. i certainly agree, and most of my reporter colleagues and others who watched his or listen to it on the live stream agree that that's not where the court is going, and it may well be unanimous,...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
KRON
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice ketanji brown jackson question. the argument from trump's attorneys that what happened january 6th did not meet the criteria for insurrection. you it did not involve an organized attempt to overthrow the government to friend insurrection. that needs to be organized, concerted effort. this was a riot. >> it was not an insurrection. the events were shameful, criminal, violent, all those things but did not qualify insurrection as that term is used in section both sides urged the court to come to a decision quickly. certainly before super tuesday, march 5th. >> the bottom line, the supreme court appeared likely to reject the argument that the 14th amendment bar startled trump from returning to the white house. the >> 14th amendment was written to restrict states power. it starts by saying no state shall the nie. equal protection denied due process. so to have a provision in which would expand state power and keep people off the strikes us as a little counterintuitive and they just don't want to go near the politics of t
justice ketanji brown jackson question. the argument from trump's attorneys that what happened january 6th did not meet the criteria for insurrection. you it did not involve an organized attempt to overthrow the government to friend insurrection. that needs to be organized, concerted effort. this was a riot. >> it was not an insurrection. the events were shameful, criminal, violent, all those things but did not qualify insurrection as that term is used in section both sides urged the...
0
0.0
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
[cheers and applause] her name is ketanji brown jackson and she's smarter than the rest of these guysand by the way, we're appointing more women to the federal court -- black women to the federal courts appeals than any other president in the history of america combined. [applause] all told, with the help of the senator from the state of illinois, i've gotten 175 federal dejongs confirmed, 2/3 of them are women and 2/3 are people of color. i also said when i got elected, i made a promise. i was going to have an american administration that looked like america. i have more women in my cabinet than men. i have more african-americans, i have more people in the background that are similar and by the way, i make no apologies for being the most pro-union president in american history. [cheers and applause] i also said that -- i asked the treasury department to do a study with raising the wages of union members, i've fought like hell to have happen and it's happening. unions are more popular now than they've been in a generation. i said, what's the effect of that? it raises everybody's wages
[cheers and applause] her name is ketanji brown jackson and she's smarter than the rest of these guysand by the way, we're appointing more women to the federal court -- black women to the federal courts appeals than any other president in the history of america combined. [applause] all told, with the help of the senator from the state of illinois, i've gotten 175 federal dejongs confirmed, 2/3 of them are women and 2/3 are people of color. i also said when i got elected, i made a promise. i was...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i like to refer to the point that we just heard about ketanji brown jackson.it's true that she really did reiterate this argument that trump's lawyer and made about whether the president counted under the 14th amendment. whether he was an officer who could be taken off of the ballot. and i think this also speaks not just with the justices were thinking about the performance, essentially of the lawyer, mr. mary who was representing the colorado voters. i would say that we all heard a lot of our arguments. i don't know if this is the most confident argument i've ever heard. and it feels like there were tons, all the justices including -- and kagan, who he has quick for. almost frustrated that they weren't able to get straight answers out of. in that he had several points the climb to answer the question that had been asked, wanting to answer something else and bring up a previous point, or a point that he wanted to get to more and even that exchange with jackson, it was hard to tell whether or not it was something you should truly believe, or she felt that this
i like to refer to the point that we just heard about ketanji brown jackson.it's true that she really did reiterate this argument that trump's lawyer and made about whether the president counted under the 14th amendment. whether he was an officer who could be taken off of the ballot. and i think this also speaks not just with the justices were thinking about the performance, essentially of the lawyer, mr. mary who was representing the colorado voters. i would say that we all heard a lot of our...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
KRON
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice ketanji brown jackson question. the argument from trump's attorneys that what happened january 6th did not meet the criteria for insurrection. you it did not involve an organized attempt to overthrow the government to friend insurrection. that needs to be organized, concerted effort. this was a riot. >> it was not an insurrection. the events were shameful, criminal, violent, all those things but did not qualify insurrection as that term is used in section both sides urged the court to come to a decision quickly. certainly before super tuesday, march 5th. >> the bottom line, the supreme court appeared likely to reject the argument that the 14th amendment bar startled trump from returning to the white house. the >> 14th amendment was written to restrict states power. it starts by saying no state shao the nie equal protection denied due process. so to have a provision in which would expand state power and keep people off the strikes us as a little counterintuitive and they just don't want to go near the politics of thi
justice ketanji brown jackson question. the argument from trump's attorneys that what happened january 6th did not meet the criteria for insurrection. you it did not involve an organized attempt to overthrow the government to friend insurrection. that needs to be organized, concerted effort. this was a riot. >> it was not an insurrection. the events were shameful, criminal, violent, all those things but did not qualify insurrection as that term is used in section both sides urged the...
131
131
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 131
favorite 0
quote 1
jackson. brought up a fact pattern why should a court not in a state but a secretary of state in one state make a decision for the nation? and it immediately hearkened your mind to maine where an unelected secretary of state, shenna bellows made a decision for the country president donald trump will not be on this ballot. >> harris: that's the other case side by side with colorado and maine. colorado went first and then you have 11 other states that hope to take the former president's name off the ballot. sandra smith, your take? >> first of all, thanks for having me here today. it's good to be on the couch. first of all, i think this is a fascinating moment for the country to be able to hear these oral arguments, to hear these justices one by one. their questioning to these lawyers. it was a little bit longer, i think, than initially anticipated. not sure what the take away is from that. but, to jonathan turley's point. just a moment ago before the president -- the former president was speaki
jackson. brought up a fact pattern why should a court not in a state but a secretary of state in one state make a decision for the nation? and it immediately hearkened your mind to maine where an unelected secretary of state, shenna bellows made a decision for the country president donald trump will not be on this ballot. >> harris: that's the other case side by side with colorado and maine. colorado went first and then you have 11 other states that hope to take the former president's...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice ketanji brown jackson focused on the amendment's specific words as another reason trump couldng the provision, passed after the civil war, didn't clearly apply to presidents. >> they were listing people that were barred, and president is not there. and so if there's an ambiguity, why would we construe it against democracy? >> reporter: the justices also were troubled by the potential impact of the colorado decision and how it could be weaponized by both sides. >> i would expect that a, you know, a goodly number of states will say, whoever the democratic candidate is, you're off the ballot. and others, for the republican candidate, you're off the ballot. and it will come down to just a handful of states that are going to decide the presidential election. that's a pretty daunting consequence. >> reporter: people camped out overnight for up to two days to get a seat inside, but trump did not attend. >> i'm a believer in our country, and i'm a believer in the supreme court. i listened today, and i thought our arguments were very, very strong. >> and jan crawford joins us now from
justice ketanji brown jackson focused on the amendment's specific words as another reason trump couldng the provision, passed after the civil war, didn't clearly apply to presidents. >> they were listing people that were barred, and president is not there. and so if there's an ambiguity, why would we construe it against democracy? >> reporter: the justices also were troubled by the potential impact of the colorado decision and how it could be weaponized by both sides. >> i...
0
0.0
Feb 25, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brown, jackson, announced that her memoir will be released in september. the book will be entitled lovely one. the publisher, penguin random house, which describes vibe's justice jackson's book as an inspiring, revelatory autobiography from the first black woman ever to serve on the united states supreme court. also in the news, semaphore reported that pennsylvania democratic senator john fetterman is writing a book about his life and his struggles with mental health. the report noted that senator fetterman is working with best selling author buzz bissinger on the book. another book that's coming out, wnba star and olympic gold medalist brittney griner, is publishing a book about the ten month she spent in russia's prison system. ms. griner was arrested, of course, at a moscow airport for possession of cannabis oil just days before russia invaded ukraine. that was in february of 2022. she was released in december of that year in a prisoner swap with the us for a russian arms dealer. ms. grinder's book is entitled coming home coming out in may. and one more
brown, jackson, announced that her memoir will be released in september. the book will be entitled lovely one. the publisher, penguin random house, which describes vibe's justice jackson's book as an inspiring, revelatory autobiography from the first black woman ever to serve on the united states supreme court. also in the news, semaphore reported that pennsylvania democratic senator john fetterman is writing a book about his life and his struggles with mental health. the report noted that...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> laura: i can't believe biden had katanji brown jackson. i forgot that one. thank you. jesse watters is next. check me out on twitter x. >> jesse: welcome to jesse water's "prime time" tonight. >> the book my mail that came in, they came from our organization. >> jesse: kickbacks, sexting, bribery. meet the new wanda. the fbi caught catfishing americans trying to secure the border. >> are you the bud light genie? >> ya. >> i wish i was at the fight. >> jesse: bud light transitions back to a man. should we let them. plus ... (screaming) >> jesse: this is a government of the people, by the people, for the people no longer. it's now a government by the corporations, of the corporations and by the corporations. that was president rutherford b.hayes. behind the gilded age was greed and corruption. tie kaopbz lining the pockets of politician gobbling upland acre by acre. bribing public officials has always been part of the business and occasionally the fbi catches wind of it. >> the arrests of one senator, congressmen and others. the law lickers were on tape accepting brides
. >> laura: i can't believe biden had katanji brown jackson. i forgot that one. thank you. jesse watters is next. check me out on twitter x. >> jesse: welcome to jesse water's "prime time" tonight. >> the book my mail that came in, they came from our organization. >> jesse: kickbacks, sexting, bribery. meet the new wanda. the fbi caught catfishing americans trying to secure the border. >> are you the bud light genie? >> ya. >> i wish i was at...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
listen to this moment because, when it was raised, i think it was between justice ketanji brown jackson jonathan mitchell, representing trump. listen to this. >> for an insurrection there needs to be an organized, concerted effort to overthrow the government of the united states through violence. this -- >> so the point is a chaotic effort to overthrow the government is not an insurrection? >> we didn't concede that it's an effort to overthrow the government, either, justice jackson. now these criteria are met. this was a riot, not an insurrection. >> what is your reaction to that moment? also, take me into that courtroom. >> i loved her comment. i thought she was terrific. i actually thought the two newest justices asked some of the best questions. doesn't have to be organized? can it just be a chaotic ride? the fact is it was a deliberative action to stop the peaceful transfer of power. you know, riots happen. riots have happened throughout our nation's history, but this is the first one i could think of since the civil war in which a group of people did not like an outcome, an indivi
listen to this moment because, when it was raised, i think it was between justice ketanji brown jackson jonathan mitchell, representing trump. listen to this. >> for an insurrection there needs to be an organized, concerted effort to overthrow the government of the united states through violence. this -- >> so the point is a chaotic effort to overthrow the government is not an insurrection? >> we didn't concede that it's an effort to overthrow the government, either, justice...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
here is justice brown jackson asking former president trump's lawyer whether january 6 qualified as anurrection. [video clip] >> the supreme court concluded that the violent attempts of the petitioner supporters in this case to halt the count on january 6 quafy as an insurrection as defined by section three. and i read your opening brief to accept that those events counted as insurrection. but then your reply seems to suggest that they were not. what is your position? >> we never accepted or conceded that this wasn insurrection. we said that president trump did not engage in any acts that can plausibly be cause for insurrection. >> what is your argument that it wanot? europe reply. -- your reply brief says it does not involve an organized attempt to overthrow the government? >> for an insurrection there needs to be a concerted and organized effort to overthrow the united states to violence. >> so a chaoc effort is not an insurrection? >> we d not concede that it was an effort to overthrow the government. >> the events were shameful, criminal and violent but did not qualify as insurrect
here is justice brown jackson asking former president trump's lawyer whether january 6 qualified as anurrection. [video clip] >> the supreme court concluded that the violent attempts of the petitioner supporters in this case to halt the count on january 6 quafy as an insurrection as defined by section three. and i read your opening brief to accept that those events counted as insurrection. but then your reply seems to suggest that they were not. what is your position? >> we never...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jackson.mp was able to command time in the middle of the day, we took him live on this program. not everybody did. cnn cut away from live remarks from trump and for some unexplained reason, busting out into laughter. >> iran was broke when we left. we have gotten all the analysis out of trump. this is a time for him to come out and say -- >> it is odd. >> he wants to talk about himself, not the supreme court did a nice job today. >> harris: the example i gave when biden couldn't remember hamas and a reporter had to kick him that word. it is ironic that is who they pull away. former president was saying iran did not have enough money to send to all proxies. >> kayleigh: what was their reason for pulling away? trump was having a good moment? best for trump and worst for biden. trump spoke about the american people, iran, israel, ukraine, american steel jobs, the border. he was calm and measured. contrast with biden, angry, defensive about him, not about you. if trump we saw yesterday meets biden
jackson.mp was able to command time in the middle of the day, we took him live on this program. not everybody did. cnn cut away from live remarks from trump and for some unexplained reason, busting out into laughter. >> iran was broke when we left. we have gotten all the analysis out of trump. this is a time for him to come out and say -- >> it is odd. >> he wants to talk about himself, not the supreme court did a nice job today. >> harris: the example i gave when biden...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice brown jackson: how about anything in which the trigger functions the same way? by functions, i don't necessarily know that that means it has to move in the same way. it could function the same way insofar as it automatically allows for 800 rounds to be released. mr. fletcher: exactly, the function of the trigger let's the shooter start the firing sequence, and we think the statute is aimed at we are worried about guns that let you shoot many shots without manual action. a single function of the trigger, does the shooter have to do one thing or many things? >> can we step back a minute? i can understand why these should be made illegal, but we are dealing with a statute enacted in the 1930's. through many administrations, the government took the position that these bump stocks are not machine guns. then you adopted an interpretive role, not even legislative, saying otherwise that would render between a quarter of a million to a half million people federal felons, not even through a process they could challenge, subject to 10 years in federal prison, and the only
justice brown jackson: how about anything in which the trigger functions the same way? by functions, i don't necessarily know that that means it has to move in the same way. it could function the same way insofar as it automatically allows for 800 rounds to be released. mr. fletcher: exactly, the function of the trigger let's the shooter start the firing sequence, and we think the statute is aimed at we are worried about guns that let you shoot many shots without manual action. a single...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jackson who kay on in 2022 but after she had been on a trial court and d.c. circuit. when she was on a trial court she presided over the early january 6th cases. and just for a couple of monls, but she had a chancee face to face the consequences of that attack and the people who were involved in it. she is distinct among her colleagues in that way. at one point she referred to the violence at the capitol, she compared it to a lynch mob. she had very strong words. she's had to experience it in a way her colleagues hasn't. she's already a historic justice. we haven't seen really in action much yet. she's the first african american woman on the court. so i think, you know, people will be wise to be listening to her, but unlike elena kagan, her more senior colleague on the left, she is probably not going to be ready to be part of a compromise at the center but she will probably speak some uncomfortable truths about january 6th. >> follow up with ellie. which justice are you going to be looking and listening for to get a sense of what's going on? >> the three libe
jackson who kay on in 2022 but after she had been on a trial court and d.c. circuit. when she was on a trial court she presided over the early january 6th cases. and just for a couple of monls, but she had a chancee face to face the consequences of that attack and the people who were involved in it. she is distinct among her colleagues in that way. at one point she referred to the violence at the capitol, she compared it to a lynch mob. she had very strong words. she's had to experience it in a...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and ketanji brown jackson said it's not in the provision, that it'd be excluded. it was a fascinating, interesting day of reading the text of the constitution and learning about the intent of the people who wrote the 14th amendment. the end of the day, if people want to get rid of donald trump, they'll have to vote against him. he's not going to be excluded from the ballot. >> ken dilanian and former u.s. attorney chuck rosenberg, thank you, both, very much. >> thanks, guys. >>> 60 years ago today, this happened. >> ladies and gentlemen, the beatles! [ cheers and applause ] ♪ close your eyes and i'll kiss you ♪ ♪ tomorrow, i'll miss you remember, i'll always be true ♪ ♪ and if while i'm away i'll write home every day ♪ ♪ and i'll send all my loving to you ♪ >> that is amazing. >> 60 years ago. >> 60 years? >> 60 years ago. i will tell you, my parents were young. 20-somethings when they watched that. just shocked, telling me they were absolutely shocked by what they saw. i know billy graham stayed home from church that night. he heard that it was going to be such a
and ketanji brown jackson said it's not in the provision, that it'd be excluded. it was a fascinating, interesting day of reading the text of the constitution and learning about the intent of the people who wrote the 14th amendment. the end of the day, if people want to get rid of donald trump, they'll have to vote against him. he's not going to be excluded from the ballot. >> ken dilanian and former u.s. attorney chuck rosenberg, thank you, both, very much. >> thanks, guys....
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> laura: i can't believe biden had katanji brown jackson. i forgot that one. thank you.xt. check me out on twitter x. >> jesse: welcome to jesse water's "prime time" tonight. >> the book my mail that came in, they came from our organization
. >> laura: i can't believe biden had katanji brown jackson. i forgot that one. thank you.xt. check me out on twitter x. >> jesse: welcome to jesse water's "prime time" tonight. >> the book my mail that came in, they came from our organization
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
of every other state and throwing a leader of the opposition party ornament the ballot and ketanji brown jackson questions whether or not colorado's 165 some odd page opinion should be meaning it's misinterpreted in that clause with the constitution and the third section and trump engaged in the insurrection ballot and what the court decided and what looks like they're going to decide is that they simply had no basis for making that decision and it'll be overturned. >> we're going to get the colorado decision tossed out and will it be 9-0? there's a potential for that and might be 7-2. i just don't think there's any way colorado can win this case. >> elizabeth: got it, francey, hans von spakovsky and treasury secretary janet yellen undercuts bidenomics testifying "prices will not be coming down any time soon and senator john kennedy in a rebuttal said"defending bidenomics is like defending a ffungal infection". and more on the gallop poll of democrats losing ground with black and hispanic voters. we talk on ethics against da fani willis in the georgia 2020 case against trump. special cou
of every other state and throwing a leader of the opposition party ornament the ballot and ketanji brown jackson questions whether or not colorado's 165 some odd page opinion should be meaning it's misinterpreted in that clause with the constitution and the third section and trump engaged in the insurrection ballot and what the court decided and what looks like they're going to decide is that they simply had no basis for making that decision and it'll be overturned. >> we're going to get...