serhiy, ihor mentioned the budapest memorandum, and under the budapest memorandum there is also the signaturef the representative of great britain, and in principle, why the budapest memorandum did not work, and whether there will be something similar with a bilateral agreement, well that is, rishi sunak will lose the election and... everyone will say, well, in principle, great britain will not take such risks, and we will not take such steps that will annoy putin, or can this be? well, you know, international agreements , when they work in world politics, when both parties are interested in it, not just when some papers are signed, but simply two parties have a common interest in the implementation of these agreements, look, here is the internal politics, in society. one country, there, for example, you can go to court if someone does not fulfill an agreement, there is an executive service, the police, which guarantees the fulfillment of agreements, in international politics there is no executive service, there is no international court, and therefore agreements are international, they can b

serhiy, ihor mentioned about budapest memorandum, but under the budapest memorandum there is also theture of the representative of great britain, and... in principle, why the budapest memorandum did not work and whether there will be something similar with a bilateral agreement, well, that is, rishi sunak will lose the election and everything will be said, well, in principle, great britain will not risk like this, and we will not take such steps that will annoy putin, can this be? well, you know, international agreements, when they work in world politics, then... when both parties are interested in it, not simply when some papers are signed, and simply that the two parties have a common interest in seeing that these agreements are fulfilled. look at domestic politics, in the society of one country, there, for example , you can go to court if someone does not fulfill an agreement, there is an executive service, the police, which guarantees the fulfillment of agreements, in international politics there is no executive service, there is no international court, and therefore, agreements a

second, if so, then i will remind everyone that the budapest memorandum was not ratified either, butt, at that time the previous constitution was still in force and it allowed similar things, including such things as the provision of external guarantees by the ministry of finance, the conclusion of those responsible. .. kind sectoral and sectoral agreements and so on, and the agreement on security and defense issues could be called such, well, this is also a stretch, but this document, on the other hand, it cannot be unratified from the point of view of the norms of the position of the current constitution, this is the first thing that must be remembered to remember, and that's why this is here, give me the wind of the budapest memorandum, it is already home, and the second thing is... implementation mechanisms, i am still convinced today that the budapest memorandum is a very serious document, but what is missing, what is not there , and what can't be in this document, as well as in the document signed by reshisunak and president zelenskyi, this is the mechanism of its implementatio

second, if so, i will remind everyone that the budapest memorandum has not been ratified either. butt that time the previous constitution was still in effect and it allowed similar things, including such things as the provision of external guarantees by the ministry of finance, the conclusion of mandatory similar industry and sectoral agreements, and so on, and the agreement on issues of security and defense could be called such, well, this is also a stretch, instead, this document, it cannot not be ratified from the point of view of the norms, the position of the current constitution, this is the first thing that must be remembered, and therefore here this is a breeze of the budapest memorandum, it already home and the second thing is the implementation mechanisms , i am still convinced today that the budapest memorandum is a very serious document, but what is missing, what is not there and what cannot be in such a document, as well as in the document signed by reshisunak and by president zelenskyi, this is the mechanism of its implementation, what i mean, well, the first thing is a

second, if so, then i will remind everyone that the budapest memorandum was not ratified either, butt that time the previous constitution was still in force and it allowed similar things, including such things as the provision of external guarantees by the ministry of finance, the conclusion of obligations... similar sectoral and sectoral agreements and so on, and the agreement on security and defense issues could have been called that, well, this is also a stretch, but this document... it cannot be ratified from the point of view of the norms of the position of the current constitution, this is the first thing that must be remembered, and that is why this give me the breeze of the budapest memorandum, it is already home, and the second thing is the implementation mechanisms, i am still convinced today that the budapest memorandum is a very serious document, but what is missing, what is not there... should and what cannot be in such a document, as in the document signed by reshisunak and president zelenskyi, this is the mechanism for its implementation, what i mean is, well, the firs

, i am still convinced today that the budapest memorandum is a very serious document, but what is missing is not there, and what cannot be in such a document, as in the document signed... by reshi sunak and president zelenskyi, this is the mechanism for its implementation, what i mean is, well, the first, actually, is ratification, because then it becomes a law, which means that the organizational structure is being adjusted under it in ukraine as well , and accordingly in great britain, because let me remind you, an analogue, an analogue of such a security guarantee, is an act between the government. of the united states of america and taiwan, it's called the taiwan relations act, the taiwan relations act, which, not only was it passed by congress and the senate, it it was also voted in the parliament of taiwan. in this way, it is a document for two parties, and i would still recommend to ukrainian specialists who take care of this topic to take this document and... look at it, how it is designed. next, if you read the signed agreement, it has a limited time and term. in fact, this is a

today that the budapest memorandum...his is a very serious document, but what is missing, what is not there, and what cannot be in such a document, as well as in a document signed by the reshisunak. by president zelenskyi, this is the mechanism of its implementation , which i mean, well, first of all, it is actually ratification, because then it becomes a law, which means that the organizational structure is being adjusted under it in ukraine and , accordingly, great britain, because i will remind you, analog, analog such security guarantee, is an act between the government of the united states of america. and taiwan, it is called the taiwan relations act, the taiwan relations act, which, not only was it voted on by the congress and the senate, but it was also voted on by the parliament of taiwan. in this way, it is a document for two parties, and i would still recommend to ukrainian specialists who take care of this topic to take this document and look at it, how it is designed. next, if you read the signed agreement, it

second, if so, i will remind everyone that the budapest memorandum is also not ratified. forged, butat that time the previous constitution was still in force and it allowed similar things, including such things as the provision of external guarantees by the ministry of finance, the conclusion of mandatory similar sectoral and sectoral agreements and so on, and the agreement on security and defense issues could be called such, well, this is also a stretch, but this document, on the other hand, it cannot be ratified. from the point of view of the norms of the position of the current constitution, this is the first thing that must be remembered, and therefore here is the wind of the budapest memorandum, it is already at home, and the second thing is the implementation mechanisms, i am still convinced today that the budapest memorandum is a very a serious document, but what is missing, what is not there, and what cannot be in such a dock. as in the document signed by reshi sunak and president zelensky, it is the mechanism of its implementation that i mean, well, the first actually. this

serhiy, ihor mentioned about budapest memorandum, but under the budapest memorandum there is also: the signature of the representative of great britain, and in principle, why the budapest memorandum did not work and whether there will be something similar with a bilateral agreement, well, that is, rishi sunak will lose the election and everything will be said, well, in principle, great britain will not risk like this, and we will not take such steps that will annoy putin, can this be? you know, international agreements, when working in world politics, when both sides are interested in it, not just when some papers are signed, but simply two parties have a common interest in ensuring that these agreements are fulfilled, so look at the internal politics, in the society of one country, there, for example, you can go to court if someone does not fulfill the agreement, there is an executive service, the police, which guarantees the fulfillment of agreements , in international politics there is no... there is no executive office, there is no international court, and therefore agreements are

second, if so, then i will remind everyone that the budapest memorandum was not ratified either, butt that time the previous constitution was still in force and it allowed similar things, including such things as the provision of external guarantees by the ministry of finance, the conclusion of mandatory similar industry agreements and sectoral... agreements and so on, and the agreement on security and defense issues could be called such, well, that too a stretch, instead this document, it cannot be ratified from the point of view of the norms of the position of the current constitution, this is the first thing that must be remembered, and therefore here, give me the breeze of the budapest memorandum, it is already deme, and the second thing is the implementation mechanisms . even today, i am convinced that the budapest memorandum is a very serious document, but what is missing there, what is there for ukrainians who take care of this topic, take this document and look at it, how it is designed. the following, if read into the signed agreement, then it is limited in time and duration

memorandum, i was in budapest, just then in 1994 in the delegation, i remember it perfectly, except for one, in all these security documents, there are memoranda, agreements and not only security ones, but they have only one: i will tell you this, not a diplomatic one, the budapest memorandum has a signatory who, well , to put it bluntly, he absolutely does not care about international law from the big kremlin bell tower, that is the flaw, that is, everything that russia signs, it, remember bismarck, what he said about it, therefore... of course, the budapest memorandum had this flaw , that the signature of russia is not to be trusted in any case, this should be such a historical lesson, learned once and for all, you can't, and there was another nuance there, so i remember perfectly all those negotiations with three nuclear powers, and above all with one, the american one. because at that time the americans pressed more than anything else to conclude such an agreement. the russians followed him. but, young ukraine at that time, which was only 3-4 years old from restored independence

after 1991, after the famous budapest memorandum, that is why it is a really important document, and it is of course being discussed at the expert level and at the level of journalists, despite the fact that the near east overshadows ukrainian news, it is so, it is so , it must be stated, but of course the agreement is being discussed and already now, for example, i see in the english-speaking segment of twitter that discussions have begun about whether it is safe. agreement, are these security guarantees, or are they just assurances of safe in safe, so to speak, interactions, because the agreement is called an agreement on cooperation in the field of security, which means that the discussion continues on the basis of the words guarantees and assurances, that is , if the agreement gives security guarantees, it is a 100% guarantee that if ukraine is in... for example, in a difficult situation, great britain will help it , and assurances is more like the smoothed wording that was used, by the way, in the budapest memorandum, it is as if promises to ensure security, but not guarantees,

please, i remember this trip to bergen, i remember the budapest memorandum, i was with budapest, just 1994 as part of a delegation , i remember it perfectly, except for one, in all these security documents, there memoranda, agreements and not only security ones, but uh, they have one problem.

memorandum, so it is a really important document, and it is of course being discussed at the expert level and at the level of journalists , despite the fact that the middle east overshadows ukrainian news is true, it is true, it must be stated, but of course the agreement is being discussed, and already now, for example, i see in the english-speaking segment of twitter that discussions have begun about whether this is a security agreement, whether it is security guarantees. is it simple assurance of security in security, so to speak, interaction, because the agreement is called an agreement on cooperation in the field of security, and eh, so the discussion continues on the basis of the words guarantees and assurances, that is, if the agreement gives security guarantees, it is a 100% guarantee, that if ukraine is, for example, in a difficult situation, great britain will help it, and assurances are more like the smoothed wording that was used, by the way , in the budapest memorandum, it is like promises to ensure security, but not guarantees, and in fact, if we talk about the word gu

when criticizing the budapest memorandum, and it is about a commitment, that is, certain obligations an assurance, but an obligation, is more than an assurance, though less than a guarantee. thank you, serhiy gerasimchuk, deputy executive director of the analytical center: ukrainian prism was ateri espresso. now we will have a few minutes of pause, after which we will return to the discussion of the important topic of these days, which is the downing of il-76 over the belgorod region, we will have an aviation expert with whom we will actually talk. about the important details of this whole thing, so stay tuned. tired of heavy and bulky saws? then pilka strong from unpack tv is just for you. with it you can easily cut trees and bushes. it is so convenient to use it for carpentry. it is the perfect tool for your home or garden. and the price is only from uah 1,499. also a reliable battery. in the set, call now and order, there is a possibility of free delivery, check with the consultants, cut branches, cut a beam, chop firewood, you will do all this in one movement with a strong saw, j

memorandum, so it is a really important document, and its discussion on at the expert level and at the of journalists, of course, they are conducted, despite the fact that the near east overshadows ukrainian news, it is true, it is true, it must be stated, but of course the agreement is being discussed, and already now, for example, i see it in the english-speaking segment of twitter discussions began about whether it is a security agreement or whether it is security guarantees. or is it just an assurance of safe in safe, so to speak, interaction, because the agreement is called an agreement on cooperation in the field of security, which means that the discussion continues on the basis of the words guranties and assurances, that is, if the agreement gives security guarantees, it is a 100% guarantee that if ukraine is, for example, in a difficult situation, great britain will help it, and

my question is: is the current agreement a kind of variant of the budapest memorandum, or is it something more effective? i have already answered your question that it is actually, well, britain is a member of nato from the very beginning, ukraine is not a member of nato, nato, the security guarantee, the main thing is if it is for one of the members. nato is attacked, then all other members of nato are considered to be attacking themselves, but it says, i understand, yes, but in... this agreement does not contain, it is an agreement on cooperation in the field of security, an agreement which britain has very little outside, very little, that's why british observers call this agreement historic, because it was concluded at a very specific time, with a very specific country, which today ... according to the admission of the same british, americans, actually defends, read , at least, i had time to look at the preamble, very strong uh-uh text of the preamble , very strong text of the preamble, so from a political point of view, this is a very uh-uh powerful document, which is just the right

well, actually, if we were to say, to compare it with the same budapest memorandum, is it from... such a serious document, i think that it is a serious document, because it spells out the status quo that exists now, that great britain will continue to provide ukraine with weapons, that great britain will continue to train the ukrainian military, and there will be a joint production of weapons, it was stated, in particular, about drones that the british will finance production of this type of weapon. and i think that comparisons with the budapest memorandum are incorrect, because everyone expected that there would be a specific concept, the phrase security guarantee, but security guarantees are when the british military will fight in ukraine against the russians, but this will not happen, and that none of the g7 or nato countries is ready to leave. so they can provide. give us weapons, training, provide financial assistance, support in any other projects, facilitate that there are many bilateral projects, but no military will not be sent here, and in my , and in my opinion, the security

the failure would be a violation of the budapest memorandum so it is important. >> the most importantve been given back to the stat:es i want to see how politicians handle the issue and creating access to healthî care alternatives and making sure mothers and babies are protected. >> my name is alfredotant issues education. no one has been talking about this and we havbeen falling behind hereafter year. >> tt issue to me is public discourse. we've entered a time where politics are divisive and it's time that candidates commit to 9 vi c-span's voices 2024. the part of the conversation. >> c-span is your unfiltered view of government, funded by these companies and more wooden charter communications. >> charter is proud to be recognized as one of the best internet providers and we're are just gettingrted, building 100,000 miles of infrastructure to reach those who needed them the most. icatio supports c-span as along with other providers, giving you a front row seat >> after finishing second in the iowa caucus, ron desantis traveled to hampton, new hampshire, to campaign ahead of the prim

i believe the failure to support ukraine would be a violation of the 1994 budapest memorandum. >> theportant issue to me this election would be the issue of abortion now that roe v. wade is turned over and the right given back to the states. i'm interested to see how politicians handle the issue in terms of reproductive health and making a bush and the unthinkable and making access to other health care alternatives and making sure mothers and babies are protected in the womb and outside of it. >> i'm in ohio. the most important issue to me this election cycle is education. i feel that no one has been talking about this issue and we have been falling behind year after year. >> the most important issue to me this election cycle is returning civility to our election discourse. our politics has taken a divisive hedge, and i think it's time for candidates to commit to going back to civil discourse. >> c-span's voices 2024. be a part of the conversation. >> c-span is your unfiltered view of government. we are funded by these television companies and more. >> the world has changed. today, th

memorandum, although it is not valid in practical terms, but no one canceled it, that is, it does nothe obligation remain, so now it is necessary... we are obliged to simply translate it into the form that will truly become a guarantee of security for us, and this is the only way, this is joining nato. everything else, this, and this is what is said in this contract itself, is temporary. it is said that when ukraine joins nato, the parties will change some of the provisions of this agreement, because, well, there will be no need for it anymore, so these are temporary agreements until ukraine joins nato, and therefore, let's be honest and let's speak the truth with our song fellow citizens, these are not guarantees in the sense of guarantees for alliance members, these are wonderful multilateral, multi-layered, multi-e... phased agreements on assistance in the field of defense and security, it is true, and if we have such agreements with, say, most countries nato, this will definitely be a big positive for us, but i repeat once again, this will not mean that these treaties will provide

memorandum, so this very timely and very strong gesture of great britain is, in fact, the beginningthe process that was announced at the vilnius summit, about the signing of bilateral guarantees with the g7 countries , for the period until ukraine became a full member of nato. and it was richy sonak who spoke in kyiv about the fact that britain is putting a shoulder, and if ukraine ends up in nato as soon as possible, then this agreement will exhaust itself. actually, it seems to me that... great britain, with this act, started such a wider process of preparing ukraine for nato. there are high hopes for the summit, the nato anniversary summit in washington, but this is the first of a series of these bilateral security agreements, the first such agreement, and we can say that the next couple of months. probably, we will draw up such security agreements with the countries of the big seven, which in fact will be such a very strong gesture to other countries, well, let's say, junior nato partners, to be ready to accept ukraine, while rishi sunak was in kyiv, shmyhal's government was rew

memorandum, so this very timely and very strong gesture of great britain, essentially. is, well, the beginning of the process that was announced at the vilnius summit, about the signing of bilateral guarantees with the countries of the big seven, for the period until ukraine became a full member of nato. and it was rishi sonak in kyiv who spoke about the fact that britain is putting a shoulder, and if ukraine ends up in nato as soon as possible, then this agreement will exhaust itself. actually, it seems to me that it was great britain with this act, uh, that started such a wider process of preparing ukraine for nato. there are high hopes for the summit, the nato jubilee summit in washington, but this is the first of a series of these bilateral security agreements, the first such agreement, and you can say that... in the next couple of months , we will probably formalize such, with the g7 countries , these security agreements, which will essentially be such a very strong gesture to others countries, let's say, junior partners in nato, to be ready for the acceptance of ukraine into na

memorandum, although it is not valid... in practical terms, but no one canceled it, that is, it is notid, but the obligations remain, so now we need these are obliged to simply translate into the form that really is will become a guarantee of security for us, and this is the only way, this is joining nato, everything else, this, and this is actually what is said in this treaty itself, is temporary, it is said that when ukraine joins nato, the parties will change provisions of this agreement, because there will be no need for this anymore, so these are temporary agreements until ukraine joins nato. and so, let's be honest and let's tell the truth to our fellow citizens, these are not guarantees in the sense of guarantees for alliance members. these are beautiful multi-sided, multi-layered, multi-staged defense and security assistance agreements , that's true, and if we have such agreements with, say, most of the nato countries, that will certainly be a big positive for us, but again, it will not mean that these agreements will require that our ... the visas will defend ukraine in the ev

relied on the fact that the west guaranteed us security with the budapest memorandum, and we don't needo think about that, why are we now ... at the point where we have to convince the western countries that we need long-range weapons and that we need missiles , and we simply do not use what we have, and even more so, in the late 90s or early 2000s, they gave half a thousand x55 missiles, which are now simply flying on ukrainian soil from russia, well, maybe this is it no... and the missiles are transferred, but there is actually a problem, the problem is that the ukrainian armed forces were formed for the defense of their own territory, that is , the ukrainian armed forces did not plan any encroachments on neighboring territories, then we fell into a certain technological trap, because the types of weapons that remained on the territory of ukraine recently. in principle, they were still competitive for some period, but competitively capable in opposition to countries similar to the eu. at the technological level, since russia was still engaged in the development of its weapons, then fo

memorandum, listen, that's stupid. explanation, zhovko stated there , there will be no insurance, so everything is fine, well, this is a delusion, there will be no guarantees, the guarantees have already been thrown out of the draft contract, this was publicly known, so there is no question of any guarantees, so, for example, as in last year in in istanbul, the treaty was called about the neutrality of ukraine, yes, and the ukrainian side wanted it to be called about some kind of guarantees, it was called, as russia insisted, about the neutrality of ukraine, and everything is fine. who was in the delegation, they know this and are afraid to say about it and so on, that's why it's a different story, why did i mention istanbul, it's just that the form itself should be correctly drawn up now regarding an important issue for ukraine, everything should be drawn up according to the legislation, but really, well, there there is an opportunity for the delegation to take additionally, to include in the composition, to take experts, i think that in this plan they will work, that is , it will w

memorandum, so this is very timely. and the very strong gesture of great britain is, in fact, the beginning of the process that was announced at the vilnius summit about... about signing bilateral guarantees with the g7 countries for the period until ukraine became a full member of nato. and it was rishonak in kyiv who spoke about the fact that britain is putting up a shoulder, and if ukraine ends up in nato as soon as possible, then this agreement will exhaust itself. actually, it seems to me that it was great britain with this act that started such a wider one. the process of preparing ukraine for nato, there are great hopes for the summit, the anniversary summit of nato in washington, but this is the first of these bilateral security agreements, the first such agreement, and we can say that in the next couple of months, we will probably conclude such a thing with the countries of the big seven , these security. agreement, which in fact will be such a very strong gesture to other countries, let's say, junior nato partners, to be ready to accept ukraine. while rishi sunaak was in kyiv, shm

memorandum, listen, well, this is a stupid explanation, zhovko said there, there will be no assuranceso everything is fine, well, it is delusional, there are no guarantees it will be, guarantees have already been thrown out of the draft agreement, this was publicly known, so we are not talking about any guarantees, as, for example, last year in istanbul the agreement was called about the neutrality of ukraine. yes, and the ukrainian side wanted them to be called about guarantees of some sort, it was called, as russia insisted , about the neutrality of ukraine, and everyone who was in the delegation knows it and is afraid to say it and so on, that's why it's a different story, why did i mention istanbul, it's just that the form itself should be correctly drawn up now regarding an important issue for ukraine, everything should be formalized in accordance with the legislation, but really, well, there is a possibility of delegation... to additionally include in the composition, to include experts, i think that in this plan they will work, that is, it will be work, as a parallel process, y

memorandum, that even despite the change of power there i don't know, great britain, in france, in otherrovide us with that help, including, this is also reverse help, in case, for example, there are problems in great britain, which so far unlikely, but... probably, for example, well, as an option, ukraine should also direct its military-industrial complex, which at that moment will accelerate to a certain speed and hand over the shells to the united kingdom. trinkets and something more technological , that is, if we follow this agreement, does this mean that, for example, the countries with which we will sign this agreement, we will somehow be able to buy military equipment more widely from them, and they will be able to buy it, well, as if specifically for us to produce, or whether it can be predicted so, if it will be, if it will be this technique, well, look, well, i faced the fact that the countries of western europe simply do not have technology, no. and in general it seemed that it was the same alliance, but it turns out that they are just about drinking coffee, meeting in the bac

well must be supported in any case, and despite the fact that we have certain memories of, say, the budapestum, everything, but, well, you see, this agreement differs, first of all, from the very... memorandum of wording and i...

memorandum, that's all, but, well, you understand, this agreement is different, first of all, from they... memorandum of wording, and i think that this is the way to move, and that it is important to me that in principle, from what was announced , firstly, it was immediately stated that this is not a replacement for nato, this is what i would like to hear, that is, that this is a mechanism that should operate before ukraine becomes a member of nato , whenever it was and whenever it happened. the following is what basically, if you look general parameters, at least from what was announced and from what... a few weeks ago the daily telegraph, british, wrote, revealing to us some of the secrets of what should be signed. in principle, there is nothing that we did not know or that we do not see , that is, what i mean is that the provision of aid in ukraine is fixed, joint projects in the defense industry are fixed, and the status of the training of ukrainian troops is fixed. and supply and so on, that is, in principle, in general, it is that the state that is for now, that state is fixed so

memorandum.tupid explanation, zhovko said, no there will be insurance, so everything is fine, well, this is a delusion, there will be no guarantees, the guarantees have already been thrown out of the draft contract. this was publicly known, so there is no question of any guarantees, as, for example, last year in istanbul the agreement was called about the neutrality of ukraine, yes, and the ukrainian side wanted them to be called about guarantees of some kind, it was called, as russia insisted about the neutrality of ukraine, and everyone who was in the delegation knows it and is afraid to say it, and so on, that's why it's another story, why did i mention istanbul, just the form itself correct formalize now regarding an important issue for ukraine, formalize everything according to the legislation, but really, well, there is an opportunity for the delegation to also take additional, include in the composition, take experts, i think that in this plan they will work, that is, it will work as a par

memorandum, that even despite the change of power there, i don't know great britain, in france, in otherntries, we will be given that help, including, this is also reverse help, in the event that, for example, great britain has problems that hardly yet, but probably, for example, well, as an option. ukraine must also direct its military-industrial complex, which at that moment will accelerate to a certain speed and transfer to the united kingdom both shells and ammunition and something more technological. that is, if you follow this agreement, does this mean that, for example, the countries with which we will sign this agreement, we will somehow be able to buy military equipment more widely from them, and they will be able to buy it, well, it's like how. but for us to produce or can predict it and if it will be, if it will be this technique, well, look, well, i faced the fact that in the country of western europe there is simply no technology, there is none at all, it would seem that the alliance, and they it turns out that it's just about drinking coffee, meeting in the background of th

memorandum, that even despite the change of power there, i do not know great britain, in france, iny will provide us with that help, including this is also reverse assistance, in case, for example, there will be problems in great britain, which is unlikely so far, but probably, for example, well, as an option. ukraine must also direct its military-industrial complex, which at that moment will accelerate to a certain speed and transfer the united kingdom has shells, ammunition, and something more technological. that is, if we follow this agreement, does this mean that, for example, the countries with which we will sign this agreement, we will be able to somehow more widely buy military equipment from them, and they will be able to , well, well, as if... for us to produce or can predict it and if it will be, if it will be this technology, well, look, well, i faced the fact that in the country of western europe there is simply no technology, there is no technology at all, it would seem that this is the same alliance, and they it turns out just about drinking coffee, to meet against the

memorandum.ten, this is a stupid explanation, as zhovko said, it won't happen. ashura, so everything is fine , well, this is a delusion , there will be no guarantees, the guarantees have already been thrown out of the draft contract, this was publicly known, so there is no talk of any guarantees, as, for example, last year in istanbul the contract was called the neutrality of ukraine, yes, and the ukrainian side wanted them to be called about guarantees of some kind, it was called, as russia insisted, about the neutrality of ukraine, and everyone was fine, who was in the delegation, know this, and are afraid of it. say and so on, that's why it's a different story , why did i mention istanbul, it's just that the form itself is correct to issue now regarding an important issue for ukraine, to issue everything in accordance with the legislation, but really, well, there is an opportunity to take delegations additionally, to include in the composition, expert brothers, i think that in this plan they w

supported in any case, and despite the fact that we have certain memories there, let's say, of the budapestm, that's all, but, well, you see, this agreement is different, first of all , from the formulation memorandum itself, and i think that this is the way to proceed, and that we... it is important that, in principle, from what was announced, first of all, it was immediately stated that this is not a replacement for nato, that is , that i would like to hear, that is, that it is a mechanism that should act before how ukraine will gain membership in nato, whenever and wherever it happens. the next thing is that, in principle, if you look at the general parameters, at least from what was announced and from what was written a few weeks ago by the daily telegraph, british... revealing to us some of the secrets of what should be signed, in principle , there is nothing that we did not know or that we do not see, that is, what i mean is that the provision of aid in ukraine is recorded, joint projects in the defense industry are recorded and the status of the training of the ukrainian military and

memorandum. listen, well, this is a stupid explanation, zhovko said there, there will be no insurance, so everything is fine, well, it is a delusion. there will be no guarantees, the guarantees have already been thrown out of the draft contract, it was public it is known, that is why there are no guarantees, as, for example, last year in istanbul the agreement was called about the neutrality of ukraine, yes, and the ukrainian side wanted them to be called about some kind of guarantees, it was called, as russia insisted, about the neutrality of ukraine , and everyone who was in the delegation knows this and is afraid to say about it and so on, that's why it's another story, i... why did istanbul remember, just the form itself is correct, to issue now, regarding an important issue for ukraine, everything to issue according to the legislation, but really, well, there is the possibility of the delegation to also take additionally , include in the composition, take experts, i think that in this plan t

memorandum, that's all, but, well, you see, this agreement is different, first of all, from the formulation memorandum itself, and i... think that this is the way to move, and that it is important to me that, in principle, from what was announced, first of all, there was immediately stated that it is not a replacement for nato, that is what i would like to hear, that is, that it is a mechanism, which should act before ukraine becomes a member of nato, whenever that is and whenever it happens. the following is what, in principle, if you look at the general parameters, at least from what was announced and from what i wrote a few weeks ago. and the daily telegraph is british, revealing to us some of the secrets of what should be signed, in principle, there is nothing that we did not know or that we do not see, that is, what i mean, the provision of aid to ukraine is fixed , joint projects in defense are fixed industry, and the status of the training of the ukrainian military, as well as supplies and so on, is fixed. that is, in principle, in general , it is the fact that the state that exists

what consultations are, we have already seen on the example of the budapest memorandum, and they failedd unfortunately, what some experts and representatives of some official institutions sometimes do is to some extent mislead people, because for many... oh, now for some reason it has become such a beautiful fairy tale that britain is in in the event of russia's next attack on ukraine, we will be protected, only one structure can protect us, that is nato, and therefore the talk about what they say nato is now becoming less relevant, if other countries, for example, canada is next in line, then others will definitely sign with us. such agreements, they say it will replace nato, nothing like that, we already had guarantees from nuclear states and we see what they led to, led to a disaster, a general disaster, not only ukrainian, so the only way to guarantee our security is being a full member of the alliance, agreements are agreements, it's great, it's very good, we are grateful to our partners for what they do, and it's really you... in solidarity and support, but security, it's a little

memorandum, everything, but, well, you see, this agreement is different, first of all, from the memorandumitself, the wording, and i think that this is the way to move, and that it is important to me that, in principle, from what was announced, firstly, it was immediately stated that this is not a replacement for nato, this is what i would like to hear, that is , that this is a mechanism that should operate before ukraine becomes a member of nato, when no matter what and when it happened. the next thing is that, in principle, if you look at the general parameters, at least from what was announced and from what was written by the daily telegraph a few weeks ago, ah, ... british, revealing to us some of the secrets of what has to be signed, in principle, there is nothing that we do not know or that we do not see, that is, what i mean is that the provision of aid to ukraine is fixed, joint projects in the defense industry are fixed, and the status of training is fixed ukrainian military, supply and so on, that is, in principle in general... it is that the state that exists even now, that stat

memorandum there , but really the agreement is designed for 10 years, it provides for nine sections in various different directions of cooperation, provides for the prescribed funding for each year, and in fact, it even provides for the actions that britain will take there in the event of a russian attack there. federation, although in fact, russian aggression is already ongoing, and then the question arises as to what exactly is covered in these guarantees, well, it is assumed that, in particular , certain countries that have signed this agreement should gather for consultations within 24 hours and make a decision on supporting ukraine in all fields with the supply of weapons and so on, but i think that the very essence of this agreement is already important in that it already provides directions for cooperation, provides... there is an allocation of funds, and it also gives the opportunity to use the potential of great britain for strengthening of our defense-industrial complex and obtaining those samples of weapons that we desperately need. well, let's now talk about the missile

memorandum, but the agreement is actually designed for 10 years, it provides for nine sections on various different areas of cooperation, provides for funding for... it is prescribed for each year and in fact it even provides for the actions that britain will take there in the event of an attack by the russian federation there, although in fact even now russian aggression is already underway, and then there is the question of what exactly is covered in these guarantees, well, it is assumed, in particular, consultations within 24 hours, certain countries that have signed this agreement should gather there and make a decision regarding. the russians of ukraine in all fields with the supply of weapons and so on, but i think that the very essence of this agreement is already important in that it already provides directions for cooperation, provides for the allocation of funds, and also provides an opportunity to use the potential of great britain to strengthen our defense and industrial complex and obtaining those samples of weapons that we really need are needed well, let's now talk about mi

memorandum type?l, it must be said that it is combined, i think that ukraine is also using internal resources, i will tell you that we have an understanding that at the level... with the same drones that need to be produced more, it is necessary to produce and means of radio-electronic warfare, this is not discontinuous, these are generally concepts that should go together, because you need to have your own strike unit, your own drones of various types, and starting from from the simplest fpv, ending with more complex ones, systems for a longer range, etc. and of various types, well, accordingly, it is necessary to have means to counter enemy drones, missiles and aviation, and... that is why they are working on it, of course, we are helped by our partners, britain is very actively helping, other countries, the united states, providing certain information, which leads to the success of our ukrainian forces, and we see this on repeated examples, as for the agreements with britain, i consider this agreem

memorandum and the guarantees of our inviolability of our territorial integrity, and in this context i consider the situation with regard to ukraine to be toothless, because in fact... well, you know, i do not belong to the category of traitors, but will ukraine drag out the war against china, of course not. and does china today give russia high-tech equipment for their military-industrial complex? it depends on whether ukraine will drag out the war against russia, whose ally is north korea, which supplies it with long-range, medium- range missiles. well, with the help of which we can knock down ballistics, only one thing, with the help patriot. will they give us the opportunity to release patriot missiles and patriot installations on the territory of ukraine, that is, will they give us technologies and so on? well, of course not. next, will ukraine drag out the war against russia, north korea, partly china and iran, which supplies shaheds and again ballistic missiles, which is what the intelligence report is about. of course not, because we don't have that many patriots. to close th

memorandum. but we understood that this document is not about anything at all, it is not even a documentind of symbolic piece of paper, the security agreement with the usa cannot be a symbolic piece of paper, every rule, every item there must be checked by specialists, experts, and i i hope that there is a very serious team of negotiators on the ukrainian side, and let me return to the topic of donald trump and the ... some information, let's say semi-official, how would you now assess the connections, relations or contacts between donald trump, his team, and i will say so, official kyiv, because we see that volodymyr zelensky from time to time, literally a day ago , he once again invited donald trump to kyiv, when he said that he will end the war very quickly, because he has good relations with putin and zelensky, and he almost killed them there. sit down at the negotiating table, but against the background of all this, you know, you still want to understand and what are the relations between them, and to what extent is official kyiv still ready as of now for the fact that trump can bec

memorandum, listen, well, this is a stupid explanation, zhovko said there, there will be no assurances is delusional, there will be no guarantees , already thrown out of of the draft guarantee agreement, this was publicly known, so there is no question of any guarantees, as, for example, last year in istanbul the agreement was called about... the neutrality of ukraine, yes, and the ukrainian side wanted it to be called about guarantees of some kind there, it was called how russia insisted on the neutrality of ukraine, and everyone who was in the delegation knows this, and is afraid to say it, and so on, that's why it's another story, why did i mention istanbul, just get the form right now regarding the important a question for ukraine, everything should be arranged according to the legislation, but really, well, there is a possibility of delegation. to also additionally include in the composition, to include experts, i think in this plan they will work, that is , it will work, as a parallel process, the so-called plan b, yes, bilateral agreements, but unfortunately, if i knew that the

memorandum, but the agreement is actually designed for 10 years, it provides for nine sections in various different directions of cooperation, provides for financing as prescribed for each year, and in fact it even foresees the actions that britain will take there in the event of an attack by the russian federation there, although in fact the russian ... aggression is already ongoing and then the question arises, what exactly is killed there in these guarantees, well, it is expected, in particular, consultations within 24 hours, certain countries that have signed this agreement should gather there and make a decision on supporting ukraine in all fields with the supply of weapons and so on, but i think that the very essence of this agreement is already important because it already foresees the directions of cooperation, provides for the allocation of funds, and gives the opportunity... to use the potential of great britain to strengthen our defense-industrial complex and obtain the types of weapons that we desperately need. well, let's talk now about the missile strikes that took place on

memorandum, although it is not valid in practical terms, but no one canceled it, that is, it is not valid, but the obligations remain, so now these obligations are needed to simply translate it into the form that will truly become a guarantee of security for us, and this is the only way, this is joining nato. everything else, this, and this is what is said in this treaty itself, is temporary, it is said that when ukraine joins nato, the parties will change, some provisions of this agreement, because there will no longer be any need for this, so these are temporary agreements until ukraine joins nato, and therefore... let's be honest and let's tell the truth to our fellow citizens, these are not guarantees in the sense of guarantees for the members of the alliance, these are excellent multilateral, multi-layered, multi-stage agreements on assistance in the field of defense and security, it is true, and if we have such agreements with , say. most nato countries, it will definitely be a big positive for us, but i will repeat again, this will not mean that these treaties will provide th

memorandum, listen, that's stupid. explanation , zhovko stated there, there will be no insurance , so delusion, there will be no guarantees, the guarantees have already been thrown out of the draft contract, this was publicly known , so there is no question of any guarantees, so, for example, as in last year in istanbul, the agreement was called about the neutrality of ukraine, yes, but ukrainian the party wanted it to be called about guarantees of some kind, it was called, as russia insisted, about the neutrality of ukraine, and everything is fine. who was in the delegation, they know this and are afraid to say about it and so on, that's why it's a different story, why did i mention istanbul, it's just that the form itself should be correctly drawn up now regarding an important issue for ukraine, everything should be drawn up according to the legislation, but really, well, there there is an opportunity for the delegation to also take additional, include in the composition, take experts, i think that in this plan they will work, that is, it will work as parallel... process, so-called

the failure to support ukraine would be a violation of the 1994 budapest met around -- memorandum. >> issue to me this election would be the issue of abortion now that roe v. wade is turned over and rights are givenseeing how polil handle this issue in terms of reproductive health and making abortion the unthinkable and making more access to other health careernativecontraceptivl and making sure mothers and babies are protected in the womb and outside the womb. >>