in official 23, the ceqa process kicked off. in november of twe, allied submitted their application to the department of public health for the refuse truck permit. and in february of 24, several weeks ago the planning finished ceqa and issued an adendz up and will let planning speak further if you have questions. we do if this board approves this contract. in merchandise we expect to compute it and finalize the dph permits with transition occurring in implementation occurring between april and june of 2024. i want to note this transition is includes over 380 cites that will be switching to a new service provider. and with service to begin no later than july first 24. and final note here in june 30 of 24 ricology contract for service will end. the cop tract initial duration of 7 years spends to 10. the not to exceed amount for full 10 year is 119 million dollars. and this is based on representative month of equalization and includes a 15% contingency. the contract scope includes refuse collection for all city departments. compris

and that all the required ceqa for this project had been obtained. so, to conclude, i want to say that i very much disagree with how the appellates have described prior conversations, the contents of the western shoreline area plan, the provisions of state law here today. i'm happy to answer questions related to any that. i would recommend that any statements from the appellates of fact without any pressing on where those facts are derived from or sourced from are important. again, there is a high bar for rehearing request. the issues that were raised in the rehearing request did not rise to the level of granting it. many issues were covered during the original hearing. on the issue of the records requests, which of course happened after the hearing, i have not received a copy of what was included in there and what was referenced by the first appellate was not planning department information, but rec park-i don't know any specific details that conversation between rec park and dpw regarding the placement of the log bench in the median, but i would ju

district to affirm the ceqa determination and make the appropriate findings. that is just item 17. shall i read item 18? >> no. on item 17, we will take that same house, same call, the ordinance is passed first reading. next item. >> item 18 was considered by the rules committee at regular meeting on monday march 18 and recommended as amended with the same title. item 18 is ordinance to amend the administrative code to establish a permanent homeward bound program administered by human service agency and the department of homelessness and supportive housing for individuals experiencing homelessness at the risk of experiencing homelessness or formally experienced homelessness such as individuals residing in permanent supportive housing to receive paid travel and relocation to a destination where they have someone to receive them. >> supervisor safai. >> thank you madam clerk and mr. president. i rise to speak on this issue in particular because this is a program that started in 2005 under mayor gavin newsom, called the homeward bound program served over 11 thousand individuals up unt

it also underwent ceqa review, extensive ceqa review, and it received a class one and class three exemption. the appellant filed a sequa appeal on july 28th to the board of supervisors. the appellant raised several issues, such as the potential hazard of the retaining wall construction, impacts that would generate noise, dust, traffic and other disturbances, the loss of animal habitat and greenery, shadow and compatibility with the neighborhood. as with this appeal, the appellant spent much time speculating on possible impacts and negative consequences of the project and said at the time the only remedy was to deny the project outright . the board of supervisors heard the appeal in september of 2023 and at the conclusion of the hearing, voted unanimously to uphold the ceqa determination and approve the project on january 11th of this year. the permits were issued by dbe and on january 15th of this year they were appealed to this commission. moving to the merits of the appeals, the appellant raises a variety of issues. issues related to the ceqa exemption, such as the structural issues such

district to affirm the ceqa determination and make the appropriate findings. that is just item 17. shall i read item 18? >> no. on item 17, we will take that same house, same call, the ordinance is passed first reading. next item. >> item 18 was considered by the rules committee at regular meeting on monday march 18 and recommended as amended with the same title. item 18 is ordinance to amend the administrative code to establish a permanent homeward bound program administered by human service agency and the department of homelessness and supportive housing for individuals experiencing homelessness at the risk of experiencing homelessness or formally experienced homelessness such as individuals residing in permanent supportive housing to receive paid travel and relocation to a destination where they have someone to receive them. >> supervisor safai. >> thank you madam clerk and mr. president. i rise to speak on this issue in particular because this is a program that started in 2005 under mayor gavin newsom, called the homeward bound program served over 11 thousand individuals up unt

final final adequately described therein for purposes of the california environmental quality act ('ceqaansbay redevelopment project area. >> discussion and action resolution resolution resolution resolution commercial ground lease with transbay 2 family transbay 2 family transbay 2 family transbay 2 family spaces at transbay block 2 east; providing notice that the above-described actions are within the scope of the transbay redevelopment environmental impact statement/environmental impact report, a program eir, and are adequately described therein for purposes of the california a environmental quality act ('ceqa”); transbay redevelopment project area resolution no. 07-2024. >> executor director kasiofsky i thank you, madam secretary and greetings members of the commission and members of the public and as a madam secretary described a transbay one hundred one 184 affordable units by mercy housing hesitate the phase two of after all three hundred unit for the affordable housing development phase one and developed by transbay development cooperation and it was approved to explain this proj

final final adequately described therein for purposes of the california environmental quality act ('ceqa”); transbay redevelopment project area. >> discussion and action resolution resolution resolution resolution commercial ground lease with transbay 2 family transbay 2 family transbay 2 family transbay 2 family spaces at transbay block 2 east; providing notice that the above-described actions are within the scope of the transbay redevelopment environmental impact statement/environmental impact report, a program eir, and are adequately described therein for purposes of the california a environmental quality act ('ceqa”); transbay redevelopment project area resolution no. 07-2024. >> executor director kasiofsky i thank you, madam secretary and greetings members of the commission and members of the public and as a madam secretary described a transbay one hundred one 184 affordable units by mercy housing hesitate the phase two of after all three hundred unit for the affordable housing development phase one and developed by transbay development cooperation and it was approved to explain thi

zoning map and to reflect the renamed family and senior housing special use district to affirm the ceqao make the appropriate findings. >> supervisor engardio. >> i like to make a motion to amend the legislation with clerical amendments today. claire clarifying the board isicting ch acting on the 4th version. strike and replace third with 4th. replace [indiscernible] contained thin third and 4th versions of the ordinance. page 18, line 7 replace the third version with the third and 4th versions of this ordinance also include. >> is there a second for that motion? second by supervisor melgar. without objection the amendments are approved. to the item as amended supervisor chan. >> thank you. colleagues i like to duplicate the file as amended and then to urge to have your support and i like to make a motion to send duplicated file to land use particularly for the reason if i may to point to you on page 4 of this legislation articulating the boundaries which is line 8 and that's including the entire richmond as identified as the family and senior housing opportunity special use district. w

i continually lead the efforts to build housing in district 2, most recently blocking the misuse of ceqa to delay a carefully crafted preservation project. furthermore i will continue to support policies that streamline and expand housing opportunities city wide. my goal here and in all housing discussions s to sensably maximize housing production to address the critical shortage that we face. i'm confident that the file that i'm working on will allow for form base density within certain parameters. this enable housing project while protecting the historic districts already rich with community culture. today, i stand by my original vote and will continue the follow-up work in consultation with the planning department, my colleagues, and housing stakeholders. thank you. >> thank you, supervisor stefani. supervisor safai. >> thank you. thank you, president peskin. i'm a little perplexed why there is been a lot misinformation spread. what we have is mayor's veto highlights the a problem with her inconsistencies, next week it's homelessness. leaving san franciscans wondering what is next. i

i continually lead the efforts to build housing in district 2, most recently blocking the misuse of ceqa to delay a carefully crafted preservation project. furthermore i will continue to support policies that streamline and expand housing opportunities city wide. my goal here and in all housing discussions s to sensably maximize housing production to address the critical shortage that we face. i'm confident that the file that i'm working on will allow for form base density within certain parameters. this enable housing project while protecting the historic districts already rich with community culture. today, i stand by my original vote and will continue the follow-up work in consultation with the planning department, my colleagues, and housing stakeholders. thank you. >> thank you, supervisor stefani. supervisor safai. >> thank you. thank you, president peskin. i'm a little perplexed why there is been a lot misinformation spread. what we have is mayor's veto highlights the a problem with her inconsistencies, next week it's homelessness. leaving san franciscans wondering what is next. i

zoning map and to reflect the renamed family and senior housing special use district to affirm the ceqao make the appropriate findings. >> supervisor engardio. >> i like to make a motion to amend the legislation with clerical amendments today. claire clarifying the board isicting ch acting on the 4th version. strike and replace third with 4th. replace [indiscernible] contained thin third and 4th versions of the ordinance. page 18, line 7 replace the third version with the third and 4th versions of this ordinance also include. >> is there a second for that motion? second by supervisor melgar. without objection the amendments are approved. to the item as amended supervisor chan. >> thank you. colleagues i like to duplicate the file as amended and then to urge to have your support and i like to make a motion to send duplicated file to land use particularly for the reason if i may to point to you on page 4 of this legislation articulating the boundaries which is line 8 and that's including the entire richmond as identified as the family and senior housing opportunity special use district. w

hyphen zero two at 2675 gary boulevard for the adoption of those ceqa findings and case number 2019, hyphen 0004110c, a hyphen zero two at 2675 gary boulevard to properly, adopt or approve the conditional use authorization with those same conditions. the project has not changed. item six, case number 2023 hyphen 011780c 3233 22nd street. conditional use authorization with that, members of the public or commissioners or staff, this is your opportunity to request that any of these items be pulled off of consent and heard today or another hearing again, if you're in the chambers, please come forward. seeing no request to speak public comment is closed and your consent calendar is now before you. commissioners, vice president moore moved to approve as read into the record. second. thank you. commissioners on that motion to approve items on consent and rescind the one action. commissioner braun, i. commissioner. imperial i. commissioner koppell i. commissioner moore i commission. president diamond i so move commissioners. that motion passes unanimously 5 to 0. thank you for that. placing

and as of real estate transaction only, not defined as a project under ceqa. okay, final slide. in conclusion, so that's part of our agreement we're bringing these resolution of the two agreements, the repayment agreement and the property sale agreement to the board seeking approval. the goal remains, we want to preserve services for existing clients in the most stable way possible and preserve be beds in our system of care. and with that, i also have questions that i got in advance so i appreciate it. and i'll go through and make sure that i've addressed them. commissioner green, i think you had asked given current deficits have any changes been made? and do we have adequate staff to monitor cbs financial difficulties? and i'm bohr aoeg a lot of the work that office reviews and will bring periodic updates. we believe we do have sufficient financial staff wha. happens with pr rc was sudden. there is a lot of technical details as far as we're going into 18 19 noted on going concern. that switched really quickly, we're monitoring them, saw some signs that they're okay, thought the

converting private parking lots or vehicle to fleet charging production distribution repair to affirm the ceqaake the appropriate findings. >> okay. item 33 i distributed a small non substantive amendment wherein footnote 24 would be amended to remove the retroactive requirement for 311 notice, so it would read, p, where existing use of private parking lot or vehicle storage lot and development application constrrt the private parking lot or vehicle storage lot to fleet charging use submitted prior to january 11, 2024 and the rest that sentence is struct. is there a- would somebody make that motion? mandelman, second by safai. take without objection? and then on the item as amended, can we take that same house same call? the ordinance is passed first reading as amended. next item, please. >> item 34, this item recommended as amended with new title. ordinance amending the planning code to require conditional use authorizations for establishing parcel delivery service uses, prohibit parcel delivery service as an accessory use, and revise zoning control tables to reflect these changes; affirming

opportunities for comment on something like this is not just this 60 day period, it is going through ceqa and subsequent neapa analysis, we will go through design where we have to engage the community how the design is happening in their neighborhood and so we want to make clear that this is a great opportunity to weigh in and there are many others down the road. sorry for the long answer. >> [microphone not on] as the details of the design start to come in, i imagine or sure intensity of the feedback will increase and so it will be interesting to see how that unfolds. i'm curious about a couple other things that just as we were talking about this. are there assets city assets maintenance yards or things like that that have potentially been identified that could more easily or cost effectively be moved out of harms way? is that something that has been considered? >> we did have a strategy. one of the draft strategies that did involve a certain amount of what is called retreat. removal and relocation of facilities and assets, including around the islais creek and mission creek and bay area