however, this means that chadayev refused this.ic lodges. he was a member of the union of welfare, that is, from the organization where decembrism came from. in fact, the west influenced decembrism itself to a huge extent, influenced, of course, to a huge extent on itself chadayev, although from my point of view there is, like a kind of paradox, there are many such contradictions and paradoxes around the figure of chadayev, he was, i would say, even more of a westerner, yes, than the decembrist, but at the same time he belonged to the same west. well, in my opinion, still more critical, he was always on his own, he didn’t want to imitate anyone, although of course, this is the fact that he visited the west, and he visited england, france, switzerland, italy, germany, of course, this left an imprint on his entire worldview, when he returned to russia, he was arrested, by the way, he was arrested for 40 days... there, and nicholas i demanded that he testify that he was not a member of secret societies and so on, well, after 40 days o

however, this means that chadayev refused this.s there, in the masonic lodges, and was a member of the union of prosperity, that is, from the organization from which decembrism came. in fact, the west influenced decembrism itself to a huge extent, influenced, of course, to a huge extent on chadayev himself, although from my point of view there is some kind of paradox here, there are many such contradictions of paradoxes around the figure of chadayev, i would say , even more of a westerner, yes, than the decembrist, but at the same time he belonged to the same west. well, in my opinion, still more critical, he was always on his own, he didn’t want to make anyone more expensive, although of course, this is the fact that he visited the west, and he visited england, france, switzerland, italy, germany, of course, this left an imprint on his entire worldview; when he returned to russia, he was arrested, by the way, he was arrested for 40 days. there - and nicholas i demanded that he testify that he was not a member of secret societies a

lotman, our most famous philologist, historian, researcher, interpreted chadayev’s act in such a wayy popular in russia, in which there is such a marquis-pose, uh, hostility, by the way, yes, regarding the pose that can be taken, these are parts from there. is taken, so the marquis poza e expresses the truth to the dictator, the tyrant person, and thanks to this he should become, accordingly, close to him, uh, in this logic, including literary logic, uh, pyotr yakovlevich chiodaev, according to lotman, expressed this to alexander, and at the same time, in order to gain alexander’s trust , it was necessary to refuse all honors, which he did, abruptly announcing his resignation, but the fact is that alexander... his career inevitably had to end, and there was an element of humiliation in this sense, because when chiadaev was sent resigned, he was sent to resignation in the same rank, they usually gave him a higher position, and he was dismissed in the same rank of rotmister, in addition, his letter to his aunt, who cared about him very much, looked after him very much, chayadaev’s pare

by the way, there is a version that the prototype, chadsky in grief otum, was copied directly from chadayev like most of the decembrist leaders, and he not only participated, but actively participated, he took part in the battle of borodino, near maloyaroslavl, in fact , chadayev took part in all the most important battles and eventually reached paris with the russian army , received orders there for everything these battles in the patriotic war. rose to the rank of captain, then resigned . alexander i offered the post of his flag for an adjutant, however, it means chodaev refused this. when he returned to russia, he didn’t find any of his friends, so to speak, because they were all already in hard labor or in exile there, and so on, and almost the only person in nikolaev russia with whom he became friends came close, it was just alexander sergeevich pushkin, and pushkin dedicated a whole series of very famous ones to him lines, well, right back in the alexander era , basically no, well, he continued and further, so to speak, this friendship lasted . well-known, say, lines that are dedicate

yuri mikhailovich lotman, our most famous philologist, historian, researcher, interpreted chadayev’s a way that he expressed to alexander his opinion about the reasons for the performance of the semenovsky regiment, mentioning of course, serfdom. at that time in russia , schiller's drama, don carlos, was very popular, in which there is such a marquis pose, an expression, by the way, yes, regarding the pose that can be taken, these are parts from there. is taken, so the marquis poza e speaks to the dictator, the tyrant, the truth in the face, and thanks to this he must become, accordingly, his confidant, in this logic, including literary logic, pyotr yakolevich chiodaev, according to lotman, expressed to alexander, and at the same time, in order to gain alexander’s trust, it was necessary refuse all the awards and honors that he did, abruptly announcing his resignation, but the fact is that alexander... was the first to need a disinterested confidant, but he already had arakcheev in the role of such a confidant at the time when, by the way, , alexander noticed that his close one, whom

the crowd was, the eye found him immediately, but strictly speaking, this is how pyotr yakovlevich chadayevyou immediately come across this figure, because he really is the only one, so even... in the galaxy of famous, talented and other persons, characters in our history, chadayev occupies his special place, he seems to stand in the corner, it seems, yes, but it’s impossible not to pay attention to it. you don’t need to agree with chaidaev in his harsh assessment of russia, in which he was obviously wrong, in general we discussed this in some detail today, but on one thing i personally definitely agree with him, he wrote a wonderful thing is love for the fatherland. there is something even more beautiful, this is the love of truth. the most important thing that he did was to really awaken public thought with his sharp criticism, which we also talked a lot about today, awakened the discussion of westerners and slavophiles, which continues in different forms, in different guises to this day, and today, which forces different thinkers turn again for irritation, and even if his works leave onl

so to speak, i’ll resort to the help of hertzin, he has these words: the sad and original figure of chadayeve then a sad reproach against the lazy and heavy background of the moscow nobility, i loved to look at him among this tinsel nobility, flighty senators, gray-haired rakes of honorable insignificance, no matter how thick the crowd was. the eye found him that hour, well, in fact, this is how pyotr yakovlevich chadayev remained, if you immerse yourself in russian history, then you immediately come across this figure, because he really is the only one, therefore, even in the galaxy of famous, talented and others persons characters in our story, chadayev occupies his special place, he seems to be standing in the corner, it seems, yes, but do not pay attention to him impossible. you don’t have to agree with chadadaev in his harsh assessment of russia, in which he was obviously wrong, in general we discussed this in some detail today, but on one thing i personally definitely agree with him, he wrote a beautiful thing - love for the fatherland, but there is something even more beauty is the lo

from pushkin suddenly appears, and from pushkin not a poetic one, but this is a quote from a letter to chadayev or right back to the 19th century, it turns out that this is the semantic core of the film, again from pushkin, well, where can we get away from him, nowhere, because he is already so diffuse, but in of all this cultural element, that even when you’re making a children’s film, there’s no escape in order to elevate our little heroes a little. it’s all quite like a puzzle, so it comes together in separate pieces, and such a puzzle really appears at some point, like pushkin, it seems, is not pushkin, but how in general if you compare with chervyakov with the poet and the tsar there is a lot there, in the scene of this duel there is a lot in common you can try to see let time pass, it doesn’t matter , the knights remain always always ready to meet again. they are sometimes not noticed, but although the years fly by, knights are needed at any time, bring me armor, saddle my horse, and don’t even wish me luck, all this is of no use, since i have... it can’t just, just, just life can be diff

this is a historical podcast, we continue the conversation about pyotr yakovlevich chadayev. even alexander sergeevich pushkin, who was complacent towards him and very affectionate towards pyotr yakovlevich, spoke out against chiodayev’s position. he wrote about him: he was born by the highest will of heaven in the shackles of royal service, he would have been a brute in rome, a crossroads in athens, but here he is a hussar officer. this was written early in... the message to chaadaev was already quoted, he has more than one message to chaadaev, this is such a part of a humorous epigram, but pushkin in april thirty-six years after the publication of the letter , he writes a critical response to chiodaev, where he analyzes it in sufficient detail, he writes himself that it turned out to be a huge letter, analyzes his point of view, i will not quote this letter in full, although it is very worth reading, because from my point of view alexander sergeevich here from the point of view of historical accuracy, not only from my point of view, was more right, of course, than pyotr yak

he participated in the battle of borodino, near maloyaroslavl, in fact , chadayev took part in all theegrees there, in the masonic lodges, was part of the union of prosperity, that is , from the organization where i came from. decembrism, in fact, the west influenced decembrism itself to a huge extent, influenced, of course, chadaev himself to a huge extent, although from my point of view there is, like some kind of paradox, there are many such contradictions of paradoxes around the figure of chadaev, he was, i would say, even more of a westerner, yes, than the decembrist, but at the same time he belonged to the same west... well, in my opinion, still more critical, he was always on his own, he i didn’t want to imitate anyone, although of course, the fact that he visited the west, and he visited england, france, switzerland, italy, germany, of course, this left an imprint on his entire worldview, and when he returned to russia, he was arrested , by the way, according to december. chiodayev pushkin's christ-loving comrade , she, the star of captivating happiness, will come, russia will

a kind of intellectual provocation , well... you can’t look at just today, but this very premise of chadayeve past and today’s future, it doesn’t work, in fact it doesn’t work, this publication, it had the effect of such an explosion, that’s what it’s like for him -it was necessary to react, well, nikolai, as you already said, he reacted in his usual manner, he summed up the scandal. taking into account the painful condition of the unfortunate man, the government, in its solicitude, orders him not to leave the house and to provide him with pre-health medical benefits; in general, he was under this house arrest -