colston was closely associated with african royalty.g archive showed that a significant part of the income of the church of england was formed through donations from rich people of that time - they were slave workers, also the church of england further invested her funds in companies that were the most profitable in the 14th century, they were also engaged in robot trading, it is curious that the queen anne fund was also used for the movement of capital, which... was created, as stated, solely for the sake of helping the poor. the decision on reparations was once made in britain in the 19th century, after the ban on the slave trade, but the money was then awarded not to former slaves, but to former fish owners, compensation, one might say, for the loss of breadwinners. payment of £300 million to wealthy families, this is the current money dragged on for almost 200 years and only ended during the premiership of david cameron. the cameron family, like any decent family in england, was also stained by slavery, that is, the camerons could a

wishy judge, remember wishy washy judge, you remember the pulled the the judges when they pulled the colston river? that clear . into the river? that was clear. criminal damage. there's nothing else they were all else for it. and they were all let off. >> so there was a jury that was a jury, wasn't? >> they were found not guilty by a jury. you're quite good to have a lawyer in the house. >> it's very useful. >> it's very useful. >> neil's back. yeah. >> neil's got our back. yeah. >> neil's got our back. yeah. >> have lawyer >> very useful to have a lawyer and economist, it's and an economist, because it's been week for gb news. been a good week for gb news. >> but we don't want a court case. >> no, we don't want a court case, so, of course they should be prison. it is criminal be in prison. it is criminal damage, no two ways damage, and there's no two ways about i know where about it. and i don't know where that it's trinity that painting is. it's trinity college, exactly college, cambridge, but exactly where chose where they obviously chose when there very easy. >> are 9 are these easy. >>

wishy judge, remember wishy washy judge, you remember the pulled the the judges when they pulled the colston river? that clear . into the river? that was clear. criminal damage. there's nothing else they were all else for it. and they were all let off. >> so there was a jury that was a jury, wasn't? >> they were found not guilty by a jury. you're quite good to have a lawyer in the house. >> it's very useful. >> it's very useful. >> neil's back. yeah. >> neil's got our back. yeah. >> neil's got our back. yeah. >> have lawyer >> very useful to have a lawyer and economist, it's and an economist, because it's been week for gb news. been a good week for gb news. >> but we don't want a court case. >> no, we don't want a court case, so, of course they should be prison. it is criminal be in prison. it is criminal damage, no two ways damage, and there's no two ways about i know where about it. and i don't know where that it's trinity that painting is. it's trinity college, exactly college, cambridge, but exactly where chose where they obviously chose when there very easy. >> are 9 are these easy. >>

i mean, you mentioned statue in mentioned the colston statue in bristol . mean, you know, the police originally stood and police originally just stood and watched that they didn't do anything criminal vandalism. anything at criminal vandalism. and even when it did go to court, eventually the jury let them any case, absolutely. >> look, we do need >> but i mean, look, we do need to away but we do to get away with it, but we do need have a conversation, need to have a conversation, a wider conversation, especially after what we saw sunak after what we saw rishi sunak say steps of number 10 say on the steps of number 10 about what is considered peaceful and can't peaceful protest. and we can't i worry that we begin to limit the window of what is considered peaceful versus not now. >> this was not peaceful. this was criminal damage. i think it's appalling. >> but we can't be closing that window because then you're going to see more acts like this , to see more acts like this, where people act out and do things cause irreparable things that cause irreparable dam

colston was a slave driver, you decide to pull down the statue, that's not okay.in a sense, can get you off. well i think normally i would be opposed to any form of criminal damage. >> that's not the way, the right way to do politics. >> but there may be some very limited circumstances where it may be morally justified. >> so for example, some years ago a group of protesters damaged , the uk aeroplanes that damaged, the uk aeroplanes that were destined to be sent to indonesia to bomb the people of east timor and west papua, and they were acquitted because the jury they were acquitted because the jury ruled that the higher cause of international law and human rights overrode the damage they caused . and i think that was the caused. and i think that was the right judgement. equally, if a big industrial plant is polluting a local community, causing damage, particularly the young kids health, if they won't listen to reason, if they won't stop, then i think , you know, stop, then i think, you know, doing damage to that industrial plant children's health plant to save c