0
0.0
Feb 20, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and the american constitution.nd after her remarks she and adam white of ai will have a conversation about the subject that will open things up to questions from all of you. those of you watching online you can find right next to the video you are watching the e-mail address or twitter # twitter hashtag where you can send questions. and with that, help me too welcome judge neomi rao. the floor is yours. neomi rao: thank you so much you all for that very kind introduction. it's a pleasure spit ai to give -- to be here at ai to give a lecture that so many remarkable jurists and individuals have given before me. and i ask them to help me find a joke to start off my speech. they came up with nothing. but one of them did try chat gpt and i'm not sure quite what they put in but maybe something constitutional law joke in the style of judge neomi rao and nothing was funny. so i think i'll just start off tonight's lecture about pluralism in the constitution. without a joke. so today, our discourse often focuses on the divis
and the american constitution.nd after her remarks she and adam white of ai will have a conversation about the subject that will open things up to questions from all of you. those of you watching online you can find right next to the video you are watching the e-mail address or twitter # twitter hashtag where you can send questions. and with that, help me too welcome judge neomi rao. the floor is yours. neomi rao: thank you so much you all for that very kind introduction. it's a pleasure spit...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you were focused on the constitution. >> i am focused on the structural constitution.fficer of the united states is used four times in the constitution. each time it does not apply to the u.s. president. not once does it apply. >> you do not answer my question but that is ok. i want to let you use your time there where you want to use your time. >> you can take another run at me, your honor, i want to be responsive. i was hoping to talk about the first amendment and obviously president trump did not advocate the islands. we have to look at context. the trial court did place a lot of light on professor simmon's testimony and coded language. i am just wondering if you can give us your perspective to the extent of which president allows for the kind of analysis. i struggle with what i see as a lack of precedent on that particular issue. how far context goes. what is your take? >> context plays almost no role. we obviously contest -- this is an instant of joint planning or a joint agreement where president trump had specific conversations back and forth. that is what is ab
you were focused on the constitution. >> i am focused on the structural constitution.fficer of the united states is used four times in the constitution. each time it does not apply to the u.s. president. not once does it apply. >> you do not answer my question but that is ok. i want to let you use your time there where you want to use your time. >> you can take another run at me, your honor, i want to be responsive. i was hoping to talk about the first amendment and obviously...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
there are certain limits, in which the constitution itself pre-empts the state's ability to resolve constitutional questions. you said earlier that once a president is elected, you accept that a state couldn't do anything about that. you couldn't -- colorado couldn't enact its own provision and use it to get the secretary of state or the president or anyone else out of office. i assume that's because of this principal of structural preemption. >> yes, your honor. >> that means your eggs are in the article 1 basket. you are saying that even though all the questions that people have been asking have suggested that there's a problem with giving a single state the authority to render a decision that would have an affect on a national election, but you are saying that those structural concerns which might otherwise lead to the kind of result that you would accept after someone is in office are overcome by the electors' clause? >> states run presidential elections. once states have selected the electors and the electors have voted, states have no more power over the candidate who has been nominated. unt
there are certain limits, in which the constitution itself pre-empts the state's ability to resolve constitutional questions. you said earlier that once a president is elected, you accept that a state couldn't do anything about that. you couldn't -- colorado couldn't enact its own provision and use it to get the secretary of state or the president or anyone else out of office. i assume that's because of this principal of structural preemption. >> yes, your honor. >> that means your...
1
1.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
as a former judge of the constitutional court, what would you say to this question? 'll probably start with one, not without sarcasm remark, since you gave me the floor, the essence of it is that in the 21st year, president zelenskyi stated that the fact that the constitutional court is not working is even better for ukraine, and today, the question is in the plane that he allegedly will appeal to the constitutional court for interpretation, such a strange inconsistent position of the head of state, but you asked the question and... i can say that in the sense of this question, i think we are dealing with such a strange mystification that exists today. what is the essence of this mystification? besides the constitution, there is also a law, and the issue that you are talking about, it lies entirely in the plane of e-e legitimate, that is, in the plane of action of the law. after all, the norms of the constitution are marked by a general character, and the law. in order to normalize and reveal the meaning of the norms of the constitution, there is currently a law in f
as a former judge of the constitutional court, what would you say to this question? 'll probably start with one, not without sarcasm remark, since you gave me the floor, the essence of it is that in the 21st year, president zelenskyi stated that the fact that the constitutional court is not working is even better for ukraine, and today, the question is in the plane that he allegedly will appeal to the constitutional court for interpretation, such a strange inconsistent position of the head of...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the constitution says they are. but we also know they don't hold an office under the united states because of the incompatibility clause that says they can't. so maybe the constitution to us today to a lay reader might look a little odd. the distinguish between office and officers, nouns, the distinction. that's how it works maybe, thoughts. >> the meaning of officer in the 1780 has today. a person who holds office. in particular context like the commissions clause, it appears that that's referring -- that is referring to a narrower class of officers. we know there are -- >> it says all. >> we know there are classes of officers. the president pro-team who don't get their commissions from the president. we know the appointments clause refers to a class of officers who get their appointment from the constitution itself rather than from presidential appointment. people who get commissions from the president himself are not commissioned by the president. so if you read the appointments clause in line with the commission
the constitution says they are. but we also know they don't hold an office under the united states because of the incompatibility clause that says they can't. so maybe the constitution to us today to a lay reader might look a little odd. the distinguish between office and officers, nouns, the distinction. that's how it works maybe, thoughts. >> the meaning of officer in the 1780 has today. a person who holds office. in particular context like the commissions clause, it appears that that's...
1
1.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
IRINN
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
this is stated in the principles of the second constitution. like the constitution. first of all, it doesn't make any difference when the recognition of this benefit was given, the recognition of this benefit was given by the guardian council, the legitimacy of the parliament is due to the existence of the guardian council, except for the first period of the first period of the parliament, which it passed because in the first term of the parliament, you know that the choice of the lawyer of the guardian council was made. from then on, we can no longer imagine that there is a parliament that does not have a guardian, because this is not something that can be imagined . well, the parliament examines the general conditions of the country , examines the needs, the requirements, and also examines foreign affairs, with works and of course. which has control over the country and makes decisions in the house of representatives, not all of them, but most of them are aware that the reason for them should not be against the provisions of the description or contrary to the const
this is stated in the principles of the second constitution. like the constitution. first of all, it doesn't make any difference when the recognition of this benefit was given, the recognition of this benefit was given by the guardian council, the legitimacy of the parliament is due to the existence of the guardian council, except for the first period of the first period of the parliament, which it passed because in the first term of the parliament, you know that the choice of the lawyer of the...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
constitution. this case will have enormous repercussions for the election this year and also for the future of american democracy. it is arguably the most important election case to reach the supreme court since bush v gore nearly a quarter century ago. the question before the court is pretty simple actually. does section 3 of the 14th amendment, which bars, quote, an officer of the united states who, quote, engaged in insurrection from holding public office actually apply to the man who incited the january 6th riot, who tried to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power for the first time since the civil war. the colorado state supreme court has already ruled that, yes, trump should be barred from the ballot in that state based on the insurrection that he clearly engaged in. quote, president trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under section 3 because he is disqualified it would be a wrongful act under the election code for the secretary to list him as a candidate on the preside
constitution. this case will have enormous repercussions for the election this year and also for the future of american democracy. it is arguably the most important election case to reach the supreme court since bush v gore nearly a quarter century ago. the question before the court is pretty simple actually. does section 3 of the 14th amendment, which bars, quote, an officer of the united states who, quote, engaged in insurrection from holding public office actually apply to the man who...
1
1.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
IRINN
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
, the amended constitution in the second constitution. prime minister was removed so therefore. the president himself had the executive power of the government in full possession, with this attention, yes, with this point that i would like to submit to you that in any case, the government introduced by the president means the council of ministers should be put to a vote of confidence by the parliament , this shows the power of the parliament, of course. there is no difference between the first constitution and the second constitution regarding the powers and powers of the parliament, except in one case that i will present to you, but naturally , the powers of the president will be wider. he became the president, but some of the powers that the president had were transferred to the leadership, such as the commander-in-chief, which was very important , while the commander of gol qoba was at the disposal of the president. the first constitution is like this we are witnessing a change between the leadership powers of the president and there i
, the amended constitution in the second constitution. prime minister was removed so therefore. the president himself had the executive power of the government in full possession, with this attention, yes, with this point that i would like to submit to you that in any case, the government introduced by the president means the council of ministers should be put to a vote of confidence by the parliament , this shows the power of the parliament, of course. there is no difference between the first...
2
2.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
IRINN
tv
eye 2
favorite 0
quote 0
, the amended constitution was removed in the second constitution, and the prime minister was removed, so the president himself had full control over the executive power of the government. yes, with this point that i would like to present to you that anyway, the government was introduced by the president the president means the cabinet should be submitted to the vote of confidence of the parliament. this shows the power of the parliament. of course , there is no difference between the first constitution and the second constitution regarding the authority and power of the parliament, except in one case that i will present to you. kurd, but naturally the powers of the president will be wider than what we expected with hasfar as the prime minister. came under the control of the president, but some of the powers that the president had were transferred to the leadership, such as the commander-in-chief of the forces, which was very important, while the commander-in-chief of the forces was under the control of the president in the first constitution. we are witnessing a change between the po
, the amended constitution was removed in the second constitution, and the prime minister was removed, so the president himself had full control over the executive power of the government. yes, with this point that i would like to present to you that anyway, the government was introduced by the president the president means the cabinet should be submitted to the vote of confidence of the parliament. this shows the power of the parliament. of course , there is no difference between the first...
0
0.0
Feb 10, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it must be a constitutional crime. something that really goes to the heart of the security of the country. host: we will take your calls for professor philip bobbitt until the top of the hour. you can call by party. republicans, (202) 748-8001. democrats, (202) 748-8000. independents, (202) 748-8002. shortly after january 6 you published this opinion in the washington post with the headline, is impeachment the right instrument to punish donald trump? what is your answer to that question? guest: in the context of the second impeachment, i don't have any doubt that if donald trump had organized this month's-long conspiracy that that would be an impeachable offense. i was pointing out that because it occurred so late in his term, by the time the trial began in the senate he was no longer the president. he was therefore, not the civil officer anymore. the text requires that only civil officers are subject to impeachment. in their zeal to punish president trump his prosecutors try to dispense that and say that he shouldn't
it must be a constitutional crime. something that really goes to the heart of the security of the country. host: we will take your calls for professor philip bobbitt until the top of the hour. you can call by party. republicans, (202) 748-8001. democrats, (202) 748-8000. independents, (202) 748-8002. shortly after january 6 you published this opinion in the washington post with the headline, is impeachment the right instrument to punish donald trump? what is your answer to that question? guest:...
0
0.0
Feb 19, 2024
02/24
by
IRINN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
amir hosseini, do you believe that the constitution is good and the constitution is implemented badly? this has been resolved, but in my opinion, the big problem is the execution. you see, during the tenure of dr. hamid sajjadi , many people were appointed as supervisors twice , which means that a lot of damage was done. you who during the period of mr. sajjadi, there was an effort to prevent this federation from growing . for one year, the federation was run by two supervisors, and this is the least of the interferences that exist even in the federations . it was seen in the ministry of sports. in my opinion , the biggest problem now is what is the ministry of sports itself . according to this law, the objectives and duties of the physical training organization are the tasks of organization, supervision and support. this, but once you look at the president of the federation who has 4 years of experience as the president of the federation, he was the secretary of the federation for 4 years and how many years was the manager. it was so called sports, they say that you should have had a
amir hosseini, do you believe that the constitution is good and the constitution is implemented badly? this has been resolved, but in my opinion, the big problem is the execution. you see, during the tenure of dr. hamid sajjadi , many people were appointed as supervisors twice , which means that a lot of damage was done. you who during the period of mr. sajjadi, there was an effort to prevent this federation from growing . for one year, the federation was run by two supervisors, and this is the...
0
0.0
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i took this oath to the constitution when i was 17. the constitution matters to me. [crosstalk] >> trump tweeted that he wanted him gone. you would have me believe that there are republicans in this house that do not pay attention to everything that trump's and others? because you seem -- utters? because you seem to be following what he says to a t. some say you have no cognizable basis for impeachment. i would like to ask you to respond to these clients. -- quote spirit a political stunt -- respond to these quotes. a political stunt. sec. mayorkas did not meet -- commit impeachable offense or is guilty of high crimes. may i have order in the committee, please? >> the committee will come to order. >> these are not impeachable offenses. i have not seen the constitutional standard met yet, mitt romney, who actually ran for president against barack obama. there is no current evidence he is corrupt or committed impeachable offense, which is why the case is not to impeach mayorkas. i find it shocking the number of republicans who have basically come out and said that this
i took this oath to the constitution when i was 17. the constitution matters to me. [crosstalk] >> trump tweeted that he wanted him gone. you would have me believe that there are republicans in this house that do not pay attention to everything that trump's and others? because you seem -- utters? because you seem to be following what he says to a t. some say you have no cognizable basis for impeachment. i would like to ask you to respond to these clients. -- quote spirit a political stunt...
1
1.0
Feb 23, 2024
02/24
by
IRINN
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
, but not because the constitution is all right now. it has been fully implemented and we cannot fill the gaps now. fortunately, our constitution has a very high capacity in the role of self-leadership . the country is a role that can solve many of these gaps and deficiencies in the constitution but in the 12th parliament, it seems that it is time for him to design. yes, in the 12th parliament , he can do these things. in my opinion, the atmosphere of the society should be prepared for this, because in any case, the enemy of any election, any referendum, will attack. he wants to use our system. we have to provide the conditions in the country in such a way that an expert work is done first . they should consult with the leadership of wazem, who is allowed to make this change according to the constitution. let that expert group sit with pathology, in fact, the law should deal with these issues, then we will deal with its cultural context let's provide the society completely so that people know what positive points there are if this chang
, but not because the constitution is all right now. it has been fully implemented and we cannot fill the gaps now. fortunately, our constitution has a very high capacity in the role of self-leadership . the country is a role that can solve many of these gaps and deficiencies in the constitution but in the 12th parliament, it seems that it is time for him to design. yes, in the 12th parliament , he can do these things. in my opinion, the atmosphere of the society should be prepared for this,...
0
0.0
Feb 11, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
we have an unresolved constitutional question.on lets them out from under that question. >> on that point about the immunity case being right around the corner, we expect that by monday, these judges will be asked to weigh in on whether or not that d. c. circuit court ruling should stand, the ruling this as unanimously by that panel of appellate judges that president trump doesn't have absolute immunity, that he can be prosecuted in federal court for what he tried after the election. in discussing immunity today, i guess he wasn't trying to bring up immunity. president trump's lawyer awkwardly brought it up with brett kavanaugh. while brett kavanaugh was trying to focus on this question of why president trump wasn't prosecuted for insurrection, and we've been talking about that a little bit tonight, this idea that because trump hasn't been charged specifically with insurrection, that suddenly seemed to create this incredible clarity among all the justices that had that thing happened, then this would be something that there would
we have an unresolved constitutional question.on lets them out from under that question. >> on that point about the immunity case being right around the corner, we expect that by monday, these judges will be asked to weigh in on whether or not that d. c. circuit court ruling should stand, the ruling this as unanimously by that panel of appellate judges that president trump doesn't have absolute immunity, that he can be prosecuted in federal court for what he tried after the election. in...
0
0.0
Feb 5, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and he added, and the constitution is maybe the first. the founding document that incorporates improvization. so you distinguish brain between constitutional ideas and the messy messiness of politics. one could argue that the to those ideals are what anchor and allow messy politics. and when you need to do something fundamental. constitution actually incorporates a mechanism in article five for making a change to the laws, the land so. so i think it's fair to say that the part of the genius of the founding document is to is to do justice to the need for for both ordinary change new policy is getting out on the streets, electing new people throwing the bums out, protesting but also opportunities for big change. a rewriting and it's made very by by the constitution and so maybe we're maybe have actually good institutions and the. is developing the character that enables us to take advantage of those institution. and i mean i do think there's a cycle and rhythm to reform in the american history. and i i'm very taken with brian's formulation
and he added, and the constitution is maybe the first. the founding document that incorporates improvization. so you distinguish brain between constitutional ideas and the messy messiness of politics. one could argue that the to those ideals are what anchor and allow messy politics. and when you need to do something fundamental. constitution actually incorporates a mechanism in article five for making a change to the laws, the land so. so i think it's fair to say that the part of the genius of...
0
0.0
Feb 25, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i think when we think about constitutional law, the constitution was amended to change the way senators were elected. they had been elected by state legislatures. again, the idea behind that was indirect election insofar as the american people were concerned. and so and the fact that they were elected by state legislatures mean they're a little more principal, they're a little more dignified, more capacity, let's say, to be people. but once the constitution changes and senators are directly elected by, the people they're going to end up acting pretty much like the members of the house. and that is they're going to be hypersensitive to public, hypersensitive to polls. i i to said at the time of clinton's impeachment. you know, the longer this goes, the more popular he gets. you know, it's going to he's going to make 100 at some point, you know, and i think that might help explain why when the matter got to the senate. tom daschle, the democratic minority leader, and trent lott, the majority leader, both thought got to get this done as soon as possible. this is a mess in other ways. you k
i think when we think about constitutional law, the constitution was amended to change the way senators were elected. they had been elected by state legislatures. again, the idea behind that was indirect election insofar as the american people were concerned. and so and the fact that they were elected by state legislatures mean they're a little more principal, they're a little more dignified, more capacity, let's say, to be people. but once the constitution changes and senators are directly...
0
0.0
Feb 21, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
sense than the federal constitution which is derived from the state constitutions. that constitution making electrified the world. all of the states in 76 and 77 created new government it's written constitutions, which set the model for making for the rest of 200 years. over 200 years. so when they thought about democracy, they thought of it as part of a balance government ruled by the people and they should participate in the government, but they aren't the whole government. so you have the house representatives which represents the people. then you have senate which were kind of version of of the house of lords and a republican version which are designed to collect the wise and wise people of the community to to to be a second house in the legislature. and then you have an executive which represents a kind of monarchical this notion of balance government goes back to the ancient greeks ruled by one to the aristocracy. and then thirdly by the by the people. so that's how they thought of democracy and none of the greek heroes that recognized had anything good to say
sense than the federal constitution which is derived from the state constitutions. that constitution making electrified the world. all of the states in 76 and 77 created new government it's written constitutions, which set the model for making for the rest of 200 years. over 200 years. so when they thought about democracy, they thought of it as part of a balance government ruled by the people and they should participate in the government, but they aren't the whole government. so you have the...
0
0.0
Feb 2, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the constitution may not be treason, as defined.nd that it's more necessary to extend the power of impeachment. mason then moved to add mal administration to the impeachment power and it was seconded and james madison argued that the term mal administration definite evaluated from the commonly recognized phrase high crimes and misdemeanors, was so vague a term, it would be the equivalent to a tenure during pleasure of the senate, quote of madison. governor morris agreed with madison at which point mason withdrew his motion and substituted as grounds for impeachment, quote, bribery and high crimes and misdemeanors. bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors. the motion carried without any further discussion of the new phrase which ultimately became part of the constitution. here is the bottom line. as historians summarize, the actions of the delegates of the constitutional convention stated that in summary through the early debates, every ker re duty and misconduct in office as impeachable offenses and after madison objected to t
the constitution may not be treason, as defined.nd that it's more necessary to extend the power of impeachment. mason then moved to add mal administration to the impeachment power and it was seconded and james madison argued that the term mal administration definite evaluated from the commonly recognized phrase high crimes and misdemeanors, was so vague a term, it would be the equivalent to a tenure during pleasure of the senate, quote of madison. governor morris agreed with madison at which...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the constitution was created to create a more perfect order and that is that under that constitution, precious rights fall under the fifth amendment and 14th amendment. due process. let me say, mr. speaker, this secretary of homeland security was not allowed to bring his own witnesses. the majority did not allow the minority to have its day of witnesses. there were no constitutional scholars who pointed to the facts in large numbers as they would have that this is in fact a fraud and froth with misrepresentations. operational control is zero people crossing the border. that means they're not crossing for entertainment or business, but that they are just there. this is wrong, this is wrong-headed, this is a stunt and does not bequeath or equal to the constitution which is to create a more perfect union. vote against these articles of impeachment. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady's time has expired. the gentleman from mississippi reserves. the gentleman from tennessee is recognized. mr. green: i yield two minutes to the gentleman from montana, mr. zinke. the speaker
the constitution was created to create a more perfect order and that is that under that constitution, precious rights fall under the fifth amendment and 14th amendment. due process. let me say, mr. speaker, this secretary of homeland security was not allowed to bring his own witnesses. the majority did not allow the minority to have its day of witnesses. there were no constitutional scholars who pointed to the facts in large numbers as they would have that this is in fact a fraud and froth with...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
constitutional qstns. you said earer that once a president leed, you accept a stagg uld not do anything about that. colorado cannot enact its own provision and use it g the secretary of state out of office i assume that is because of this inple of structural preemption? mrmuay: yes, your honor. justice barrett: i want to clifwhat that means. that means your aches are in the basket of the electorate clause. you are saying that even though all of t qstions have suggested there is a problem with gina single state the authority to render a decision that would have any effect on a national election, you are saying those structural concerns which gh otherwi ld to the kind of results you would accept after someone is in office, overcome by the electric cross. mr. murray: absolutely. states run presidential elections. what states have selecd electors and they have voted, states have no more power over the candidate who has been nonated. until then, the states have the power to adjudicate those issues. justice barr
constitutional qstns. you said earer that once a president leed, you accept a stagg uld not do anything about that. colorado cannot enact its own provision and use it g the secretary of state out of office i assume that is because of this inple of structural preemption? mrmuay: yes, your honor. justice barrett: i want to clifwhat that means. that means your aches are in the basket of the electorate clause. you are saying that even though all of t qstions have suggested there is a problem with...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
constitutional questions. even in this election cycle, ere are candidates on the ballot in some states even citizens.ey are not natural born that is aion of states power to preserve their own electors and avoid disenfranchisement of their citizens. justice kagan: thank you. chief justice roberts: justice gorsuch. justice gorsuch: i have not had a chance to bout the officer point. mr. mitchell makes the argument that in the commissions clause, ficers are to be commissioned by the president. seems to be all-encompassing, that language. i am curious your response to that. along the way, i poked at the difference between office and officer in the other discussion. one point your friends o outside would make -- on the other side would make is that is how the constitution uses those terms. when y're the president pro tem of the senate and is bigger of the hre officers of the unittes because the constitution says they are. you also know they don' hold any office in the united states because of the incbility clause th
constitutional questions. even in this election cycle, ere are candidates on the ballot in some states even citizens.ey are not natural born that is aion of states power to preserve their own electors and avoid disenfranchisement of their citizens. justice kagan: thank you. chief justice roberts: justice gorsuch. justice gorsuch: i have not had a chance to bout the officer point. mr. mitchell makes the argument that in the commissions clause, ficers are to be commissioned by the president....
0
0.0
Feb 19, 2024
02/24
by
IRINN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
each federation should have its own constitution, we should not have a constitution for 55 federations . the period in which this work was done. in fact, he was not under the burden of what he wanted to do to approve the 55 statutes. you see, the process of approving this statute took nearly a year and a half in the cabinet of ministers and two years in the guardian council. if he wants to approve 55 of these now, how many of these years have to pass, why should he now go and get the approval of the cabinet of ministers, because of our law, in order to solve this problem, in may 1400, a single article was introduced in the previous government. this single article said that federations should be removed from the list of non-governmental public institutions and become non-governmental the non-governmental organization that the ministry of sports only supervises according to the law and has the possibility to help them, each of them carry out their activities according to their statutes, which will be the cause of their assembly , would help a lot in order for us to have such issues that
each federation should have its own constitution, we should not have a constitution for 55 federations . the period in which this work was done. in fact, he was not under the burden of what he wanted to do to approve the 55 statutes. you see, the process of approving this statute took nearly a year and a half in the cabinet of ministers and two years in the guardian council. if he wants to approve 55 of these now, how many of these years have to pass, why should he now go and get the approval...
0
0.0
Feb 4, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> constitutional powers. >> without objection. you are recognized and >> testimony from constitutional law expert frank bowman, explaining that they have not alleged any constitutionally impeachable offenses by secretary alejandro mayorkas , and they are policy differences. >> what we are going to do now is take a 30-minute recess for lunch. we are going to let everybody take a break and go eat some lunch. we are going to be here a while today it seems. so, we are going to do this in as friendly a manner as possible and we will reconvene at 12:35. this committee stands in recess.
>> constitutional powers. >> without objection. you are recognized and >> testimony from constitutional law expert frank bowman, explaining that they have not alleged any constitutionally impeachable offenses by secretary alejandro mayorkas , and they are policy differences. >> what we are going to do now is take a 30-minute recess for lunch. we are going to let everybody take a break and go eat some lunch. we are going to be here a while today it seems. so, we are going...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
madam speaker, i urge my colleagues to honor their oath to the constitution, listen to the constitutional experts, listen to your own republican colleagues who know h.res. 863 is baseless. drop this sham impeachment. i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves. the gentleman from tennessee is recognized. mr. green: madam speaker, i yield three minutes to the gentlelady from georgia, ms. greene. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman is recognized for three minutes. ms. greene: i thank the chairman. madam speaker, i rise in strong support of h.res. 863, impeaching secretary alejandro mayorkas. he's guilty of aiding and abetting the complete invasion of our country by buy criminals, gang members, terrorists, murderers, rapists, and over 10 million people from over 160 countries into american communities all across the united states. his willful refusal to secure the border has bankrupted communities, closed down u.s. schools that our children attend, drown drown hospitals and incapacitate law enforcement while empowering criminal cartels and illegal a
madam speaker, i urge my colleagues to honor their oath to the constitution, listen to the constitutional experts, listen to your own republican colleagues who know h.res. 863 is baseless. drop this sham impeachment. i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves. the gentleman from tennessee is recognized. mr. green: madam speaker, i yield three minutes to the gentlelady from georgia, ms. greene. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman is recognized for...
1
1.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
well, look, the problem there is that in addition to this article of the constitution, the constitutionjust says that elections must be held, and this is precisely the problem that would require an additional solution at the level of the constitutional court of ukraine, that is, in this is the key... essence of this appeal to this institution, they had to say which of the norms of the constitution, which of articles of the constitution are, well, let's say, more important, or which, speaking mathematically. language is first solved, and then another is solved. i absolutely support the thesis that this norm , which mr. vienislavskyi mentions, in principle gives a clear answer to this question, but this answer needs to be further substantiated, there is nothing wrong with it, there is nothing like if there was this verdict of the constitutional court, because this piece of paper, relatively speaking, sorry for such a simplified word, we would need it, first of all, to reflect all the measures that will be taken in the information field. space, including other countries, not only ukraine,
well, look, the problem there is that in addition to this article of the constitution, the constitutionjust says that elections must be held, and this is precisely the problem that would require an additional solution at the level of the constitutional court of ukraine, that is, in this is the key... essence of this appeal to this institution, they had to say which of the norms of the constitution, which of articles of the constitution are, well, let's say, more important, or which, speaking...
0
0.0
Feb 4, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
constitutional order. the actions, policies, and statements of secretary mayorkas easily meet that standard and the american people completely agree, especially the witnesses we had before this committee, these parents that have had children murdered by fentanyl, murdered by illegal aliens, gang members and so much more. there might be two constituents that were killed in a horrific car accident by a 17-year-old cartel member smuggling illegal aliens into texas. secretary mayorkas must be impeached for his failure to uphold his oath of office and for willfully breaking federal immigration laws. esther chairman, i yield back my time. >> i now recognize mr. garcia for five minutes of comments on the amendment. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i think we should be embarrassed to be here today. this is a complete sham impeachment. i would also like to point out that the previous speaker on the committee has been spending a lot of her time fundraising off of this impeachment effort. the fact that she is a posturing
constitutional order. the actions, policies, and statements of secretary mayorkas easily meet that standard and the american people completely agree, especially the witnesses we had before this committee, these parents that have had children murdered by fentanyl, murdered by illegal aliens, gang members and so much more. there might be two constituents that were killed in a horrific car accident by a 17-year-old cartel member smuggling illegal aliens into texas. secretary mayorkas must be...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
nothing in the constitution ri them in this way. the case was handled capably and efficiently under a process that he used to decidealt challenges for more than a century. i welcome your questions. >> is there an express provision that the- that defines what a qualiecandidate is? >> there is not an express provision. they look at the need to be qualified. >> how do we get to this issue of qualified candidates? >> if i could have a standing objection, you should not review -- >> i'm just looking at the statute. >> weavthree important provisions that show that candidates have to be qualifie it requires that the political party has to have a candidate. the candidates also have to be qualified. >> we are actually talking about the participation of a political party, right? not the participation of a candidate. >> the fight -- the fact is confirmatory that they had to be qualified and would not be otherwe. >> how is section three qualification? just on its face. >> a candidate must meet every criteria for elibity. not beingisalified. eri
nothing in the constitution ri them in this way. the case was handled capably and efficiently under a process that he used to decidealt challenges for more than a century. i welcome your questions. >> is there an express provision that the- that defines what a qualiecandidate is? >> there is not an express provision. they look at the need to be qualified. >> how do we get to this issue of qualified candidates? >> if i could have a standing objection, you should not...
2
2.0
Feb 25, 2024
02/24
by
PRESSTV
tv
eye 2
favorite 0
quote 0
our constitution is considered one of the most advanced constitutions in. world ecuador was once theecond country in latin america and the caribbean, but since six years ago the country has plunged into what i call neoliberal coup, in other words, attempt to restore neoliberalism to the country any cost. since then our country has been grappling with legal war, political persecution and judicial and media imposition based on some scenarios. in the end, all this case creates an environment in which politics definition of the country. and country management within the framework of the provisions of the constitution remain only in words and on paper. therefore, in the same period of time, with the opening of the markets and the governance of the country, various centers of illegal capital have been established in the country to provide the basis for neoliberal actions. the main focus is close to financial capital, because ecuador is dollarized country. ecuador lost this national currency more than 20 years. ago and the us dollar prevail through ecuador. therefore, these conditions have
our constitution is considered one of the most advanced constitutions in. world ecuador was once theecond country in latin america and the caribbean, but since six years ago the country has plunged into what i call neoliberal coup, in other words, attempt to restore neoliberalism to the country any cost. since then our country has been grappling with legal war, political persecution and judicial and media imposition based on some scenarios. in the end, all this case creates an environment in...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you're not saying the constitution gives you this role.it's the kind of combination of griffin's case plus the way congress acted after griffin's case? >> yes. >> that gives you the rule? >> that's exactly right, justice kagan. we have implementing legislation, congress took up the legislation provided by griffin's case and established in the 1870 enforcement act, later repealed. the only enforcement legislation that's currently on the books is the insurrection criminal statute, section 2383 and when congress made all of these decisions, the initial enactment of the enforcement act in 1870, all of those were made with griffin's case as the backdrop. >> please -- >> the understanding was that these remedies would be exclusive of state court remedies. there didn't need to be because griffin's case provided the back -- >> if i could just understand the argument a little better, suppose that we took all of that away, you know, suppose there were no griffins case and there were no subsequent congressional enactment, what do you then think the r
you're not saying the constitution gives you this role.it's the kind of combination of griffin's case plus the way congress acted after griffin's case? >> yes. >> that gives you the rule? >> that's exactly right, justice kagan. we have implementing legislation, congress took up the legislation provided by griffin's case and established in the 1870 enforcement act, later repealed. the only enforcement legislation that's currently on the books is the insurrection criminal...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you are not saying that the constitution gives you this rule. it is the kind of combination of griffin's case plus the way congress acted after griffin's case that gives you the rule. >> that's right. congress took up the invitation provided by griffin's case and established it in the 1870 enforcement act. later repealed them. the only legislation on the books is the insur oak shun criminal statute. in 1870 the repeal of the provisions of 1948, all those were made with griffin's case as the back drop. the understanding was these remedies would be exclusive of state court remedies. there is not an express statement of pre-- >> suppose that we took all of that away. suppose there were no griffins case and congressional enactment. what do you then think the rule would be? >> a much harder argument for us to make. normally every other provision of the 14th amendment has been treated as self-executing. what we would argue in the hypothetical there are practical considerations unique to section three similar to what chief justice chase spelled out and
you are not saying that the constitution gives you this rule. it is the kind of combination of griffin's case plus the way congress acted after griffin's case that gives you the rule. >> that's right. congress took up the invitation provided by griffin's case and established it in the 1870 enforcement act. later repealed them. the only legislation on the books is the insur oak shun criminal statute. in 1870 the repeal of the provisions of 1948, all those were made with griffin's case as...
0
0.0
Feb 26, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
constitution. but when people traveled from state, state or into the district of, columbia, which is not a state, it and it became more possible to invoke the united states constitution petition because interstate issues were involved. and so the privileges and immunities clause you're talking about article four, section two, sort of says something in the language as people acknowledged back and now is pretty ambiguous. it says something about state citizenship and kind of the rights of citizens of the state to be entitled to the privileges and immunities of citizens of the several states. and what that meant for free african-americans was kind of unclear. and had and and the kind of ability to make constitutional claims under that part, the constitution was it was a very new situation. we're talking about the early of the constitution itself. and so i argue that beginning i mean, with greater and greater intensity, beginning with the missouri compromise, which in which the debates in congress sign
constitution. but when people traveled from state, state or into the district of, columbia, which is not a state, it and it became more possible to invoke the united states constitution petition because interstate issues were involved. and so the privileges and immunities clause you're talking about article four, section two, sort of says something in the language as people acknowledged back and now is pretty ambiguous. it says something about state citizenship and kind of the rights of...
0
0.0
Feb 2, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
constitutional order.ions, policies and statements of secretary mayorkas easily meet that standard and the american people completely agree, especially the witnesses that we've had before this committee. these parents who have had children murdered by fentanyl, murdered by illegal aliens, such as ms13 crime gang members and so much more and i would tell you right now shall the family of my two constituents that were killed in a horrific car accident by a 17-year-old cartel member smuggling illegal aliens into texas would definitely agree with that. secretary mayorkas must be impeached for his failure to uphold his oath of office and for willfully breaking federal immigration laws. mr. chairman, i yield back my time. >> gentle lady yields. i now recognize mr. garcia for five minutes of comment on the amendment and nature of the substitute. >> thank you, mr. chairman, and we should certainly, i think, be embarrassed to be here today. >> mr. chairman. >> this is a complete sham impeachment. i also would like
constitutional order.ions, policies and statements of secretary mayorkas easily meet that standard and the american people completely agree, especially the witnesses that we've had before this committee. these parents who have had children murdered by fentanyl, murdered by illegal aliens, such as ms13 crime gang members and so much more and i would tell you right now shall the family of my two constituents that were killed in a horrific car accident by a 17-year-old cartel member smuggling...
1
1.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
RUSSIA1
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
, what kind of constitution?t this is what they are afraid of, they are afraid that putin will tell him that you are not giving in to him, you are fanning this fire, you don’t have enough, so you brought example, you had a plot of one art. intelligence, and so on with the bag, here they are, a bomb shelter, but this has really been going on for a long time, you know, you said it correctly, remember, we spoke, we discussed an appeal to the americans, to the american senate, parliament, congress about the downed plane, and you asked a question then, i liked it in the hall, and that we turn to the murderers, that you don’t kill, but the point is, that’s what we turn to , the killers you showed. what are they afraid of? they are afraid that putin will say: listen, well, we agreed on an exchange, the il-76 is flying, and you shot it down with your weapons, well, let us supply weapons, i would say in its place in such simple terms, we will supply weapons, for example, to the houthis, who will be fooling around, this it
, what kind of constitution?t this is what they are afraid of, they are afraid that putin will tell him that you are not giving in to him, you are fanning this fire, you don’t have enough, so you brought example, you had a plot of one art. intelligence, and so on with the bag, here they are, a bomb shelter, but this has really been going on for a long time, you know, you said it correctly, remember, we spoke, we discussed an appeal to the americans, to the american senate, parliament,...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> their job is to interpret the constitution and it is a constitutional issue.to them to decide it. they could decide it should be left to the voters but they are doing their duty to decide what the constitution means eating and abetting and overthrow of the u.s. government. >> i think other politicians will raise this question because this will be the last time they use the 14th amendment that someone should be disqualified. they need to put this to bed. and then one way or another it set aside. >> do you have confidence in the supreme court? >> not totally. >> in many cases there have been politics that have entered into it. i think justice roberts will be more serious because it is so wide ranging. >> thank you both so much. host: c-span's tammy derringer has been on capitol hill all morning long as it gets more and more crowded. this is tammy in gadsden, alabama. caller: i think this needs to be left up to the voters. they should be able to choose who they want as their president. we need to drain the swamp. there is so much corruption, it is unreal. i don't
>> their job is to interpret the constitution and it is a constitutional issue.to them to decide it. they could decide it should be left to the voters but they are doing their duty to decide what the constitution means eating and abetting and overthrow of the u.s. government. >> i think other politicians will raise this question because this will be the last time they use the 14th amendment that someone should be disqualified. they need to put this to bed. and then one way or...
0
0.0
Feb 1, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
have a pocket constitution in their suit pocket.y would have a tendency when ever they disagreed with you to pull it out and wave it around. i haven't seen the constitution in a suit pocket in the republican party for a long time. look at the list. they're abusing impeachment. they know mayorkas has done nothing to be impeached. they know that. this is a political stunt. look at ignoring the supreme court. they understand checks and balances laid out in the constitution. they understand what they're doing is violating the constitution. the peaceful transfer of power and encouraging an insurrection. they know that's not allowed under the united states constitution. so what exactly are they loyal to at this point? it certainly is not the constitution. >> i want to ask you, governor, on those two very points. i'll hit both of those two with you, sir. the first is that republicans have now said when it comes to the border, they actually -- it's okay to ignore the united states supreme court. what do you make of that? >> well, that's sug
have a pocket constitution in their suit pocket.y would have a tendency when ever they disagreed with you to pull it out and wave it around. i haven't seen the constitution in a suit pocket in the republican party for a long time. look at the list. they're abusing impeachment. they know mayorkas has done nothing to be impeached. they know that. this is a political stunt. look at ignoring the supreme court. they understand checks and balances laid out in the constitution. they understand what...
0
0.0
Feb 22, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
there drafted the state constitution. the language of the declaration flows straight into the massachusetts state constitution. the language of the declaration and constitution were immediately used in massachusetts by abolitionists, free african-americans, living in boston at the time. they put petitions to the assembly to end enslavement. they took the case to the court. the supreme judicial in massachusetts. and by virtue of a judicial decision in 1783 that ruled that enslavement was incompatible with the massachusetts constitution on the grounds of the language in. the constitution that came from the declaration of independence. enslavement was abolished in massachusetts. so that's the second important lesson of the story. the abolitionist movement had to grow greatly in force over time, obviously, before it became what we know of it in the 19th century. but as they say, it quickened in that moment. that is when it came to life. it was born. there had been prior writers and thinkers going as far back as the early 18th
there drafted the state constitution. the language of the declaration flows straight into the massachusetts state constitution. the language of the declaration and constitution were immediately used in massachusetts by abolitionists, free african-americans, living in boston at the time. they put petitions to the assembly to end enslavement. they took the case to the court. the supreme judicial in massachusetts. and by virtue of a judicial decision in 1783 that ruled that enslavement was...
0
0.0
Feb 4, 2024
02/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the constitution is old. it's terse, and we have judges, justices, a majority who purport to play pay attention to the plain language, who say, you know, we're just in there to read what the text is. the text says nothing about the civil war. it says insurrection or rebellion or aid or comfort. it captures, i think, something other than just the civil war, because if they wanted to limit it to the civil war, they would have done that. and so my response to the political arguments are, if people really think it's a danger to democracy, maxey then the answer here is to get together and amend the the constitution to repeal it. but the answer isn't to get out of sharpie and effectively cross it out on the theory that we just don't like it. that's not generally how, uh, the constitution is interpreted. if in fact, the supreme court does sort of say, hey, let's effectively just cross it out, it seems to me the bigger issue is not even necessarily for president trump in this day and age. it's really down the road. y
the constitution is old. it's terse, and we have judges, justices, a majority who purport to play pay attention to the plain language, who say, you know, we're just in there to read what the text is. the text says nothing about the civil war. it says insurrection or rebellion or aid or comfort. it captures, i think, something other than just the civil war, because if they wanted to limit it to the civil war, they would have done that. and so my response to the political arguments are, if people...
2
2.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 2
favorite 0
quote 0
of ukraine is the constitutional court, that's all, no one else, so...this done, well, earlier, this is a rhetorical question, but, er, let's put it this way, the fact remains that practically, the task is to solve, well, that is, to solve this problem, it is to obtain an official conclusion of a constitutional, as it were , a court, but why is there such a twisting of society, there are some kind of cover-ups, mutinies, there are russian special operations, well, it seems to me that it is some kind of... or twisting in advance the decision of the constitutional court, is there any potential possibility of twisting the nuts against or the opposition, business, media, civil society, i.e. will it be such a justification between international partners that we told you there colic and everything else, because we see that the only marathon, it is still under the control of the authorities, and therefore the goal of such a company with... the authorities, the russians, well, so that they don’t promote it themselves, well , that is, really in society, in us as
of ukraine is the constitutional court, that's all, no one else, so...this done, well, earlier, this is a rhetorical question, but, er, let's put it this way, the fact remains that practically, the task is to solve, well, that is, to solve this problem, it is to obtain an official conclusion of a constitutional, as it were , a court, but why is there such a twisting of society, there are some kind of cover-ups, mutinies, there are russian special operations, well, it seems to me that it is some...