seyed, if there is a constitution, it is a constitution, and we act according to the duty of the constitutionich is assigned to the experts, it must be an actual authority, and if not, let us give an interpretation to the judges. he was against the proposal of temporary leadership until the referendum to review the constitution . the temporary declaration itself that these are temporarily elected as to govern the islamic society and the islamic revolution until the law specifies this is itself a sign of weakness and they underestimated a leadership figure, but the fourth person , mr. emami kashani, spoke in opposition to the actual authority and he said that what is important from the point of view of shariah is the condition of jurisprudence and not authority. who made this discussion from the late fazel naraghi, from the late sheikh al-allamah , the company of others, and hazrat imam al-allah honorable maqama sharif, none of these groups should discuss this, but jurisprudence is at issue, so we have a legitimate debate, even though it is jurisprudence. and let the jurist take over. we have

our friends at the national constitution center, nullification is a constitutional theory the individualuld invalidate federal laws or judicial decisions they deem unconstitutional. i have been controversial american history the constitution does not provide for nullification per se. now, that said this is even worse than nullification that we have seen and the pastor. nullifying federal laws. this is eight nullification of two amendments the federal constitution. eight nullification to the federal constitution basically enshrined the entire belief system in the declaration of independence you are right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happyness. james mattis is considered mr. constitution. this issue of nullification was raised with him by a former senator, edward everett. james mattis wrote a very long letter back to him in august 28, 1830. he said this in part thus being derived from the same source as the constitutions of the states, it has within each state this idea of nullification. the same authority as the constitution of the stage. it is as much a constitution in the strict

one to choose the drafters of the constitution and finally to approve the text of the constitution. we and the constitution never say that we act against the law, no, this is not according to the constitution let's act according to the quick opinion of the imam as the legal guardian and founder of the islamic republic system regarding the non-participation of authority for leadership, but the decision on this matter remains the responsibility of the expert members and they continue to discuss this matter. . mr. khalqali emphasized that the authority. it is not real, and the country needs a leader, not an authority, we need a leader in the administration of our country . now, for yourself, mr. golpaigani is an honorable authority . mr. khoei is an honorable authority. mr. montazeri is an honorable authority. that reference let's say that we like the imam in your mind. well , your authority is an issue that people go to their own devices. there are about 2 million people among us and they follow this constitution. do you want an authority to discuss the authority of the country's lead

, actually a very cool constitution, no, look, this constitution was made by medvedchuk in order forhe state power in the country was dysfunctional, well mykhailo, mykhailo the orphan, the father of the constitution, no, changes are the 96th year of changes. back in 1996, by the way, the constitution was quite good, the only problem was to expand the powers of the parliament, simplify the impeachment procedure, there is order. the president, then they were returned again under yanukovych, but there were, yes, no, look, i am a supporter, i am a supporter of the american model, where there is a president who is the answer and heads, heads the executive power, we have a problem with what in our state, what people elect president with universal suffrage, and he is responsible for everything that happens in the country, the prime minister is some kind of incomprehensible person who is elected by some incomprehensible deputies, and we have it fixed. the confrontation between the president and the prime minister, and this, i am sure, was done on purpose, medvedchuk was deliberately pressure

you have to amend the constitution and you can't amend constitution.o find these workarounds now. but i do think that that because again, just to go back to the big theme, i believe they we

drafted by the interim government, they announced that even the constitutional constitution was far more islamic. ayatollah khamenei had also started a series of speeches about leadership and imamate, which were published in the islamic republic newspaper from the 9th to the 29th of khordad. also: in these days, a fixed column called the constitution and the people was considered to deal with this issue of the country's day. in july , ayatollah montazeri's pamphlet criticizing the draft of the constitution called do payam was published. ayatollah montazeri also wanted the principle of velayat faqih to be included in the future constitution. in this way, the first stage is publication of the draft constitution in the press. had been done the thinkers of the country had criticized and debated freely about this draft. now it was time for the next step. selection of experts who will discuss the draft with the vote of the nation and on behalf of the people and compile the final constitution . on the 12th of august 1358, the election of the parliament of constitutional experts was held. a

constitution and discuss its importance. this is about 40 minutes. >>> this is washington in action. we have several people speaking, but the first is definitely an important advocate for the 28th amendment. it's particularly a pleasure because i just found out that someone i to legislative persuaded is now the counselor. when i was visiting. i want to introducing an extraordinary advocate for the 28th amendment and equal rights. an extraordinary leader in the fight for human rights around the globe and a gray center for the great state of maryland. ae >>n do not leave us so quickly. i want to thank you. going this way. you did a great job. thank you for imparting into him what is necessary, and we have a lot of procedural problems. we thank you very much. the staff does incredible work for us. i always want to acknowledge them. thank you for being here. thank you for what you do. i want to thank the sponsors. they have some boding that they are doing at this particular moment. it is a child because of the house of represent

those who wrote the constitution at the top of the constitution took it from belgium, and many of its are incomplete, many of its laws are non-progressive. islam has no need for its rules to come from someone else. islam is progressive in all its dimensions, we all imam , who in 1348 presented an alternative model to the imperial regime, although it was ignored by intellectuals, but it gradually opened its place among the people. to the extent that a great revolution was formed based on it. and the royal regime in iran was dismantled finally, after the victory of the islamic revolution, the country's constitution was changed by the general votes of the people. in the name of god. at the same time, the new constitution is about leadership conditions. and wali faqih had mentioned both the competence of authority and the condition of authority. this caused the experts to discuss this point on that long day of june 14, 1368. mr. azari qomi believed that the person who is elected must have the condition of authority . if we can act legally, this issue. we can do temporary and emergency sit

our friends at the national constitution center, nullification is a constitutional theory the individuald invalidate federal laws or judicial decisions they deem unconstitutional. i have been controversial american history the constitution does not provide for nullification per se. now, that said this is even worse than nullification that we have seen and the pastor. nullifying federal laws. this is eight nullification of two amendments the federal constitution. eight nullification to the federal constitution basically enshrined the entire belief system in the declaration of independence you are right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happyness. james mattis is considered mr. constitution. this issue of nullification was raised with him by a former senator, edward everett. james mattis wrote a very long letter back to him in august 28, 1830. he said this in part thus being derived from the same source as the constitutions of the states, it has within each state this idea of nullification. the same authority as the constitution of the stage. it is as much a constitution in the strictes

, it was the constitution of 1978, as it was constituted then, it is the constitution of developed socialismpeople's democracy, there it is general people's state of workers, peasants , intelligentsia, this is how it was roughly voiced and... it was a kind of tracing paper on the higher authorities authorities of the union of the ssr, modeled on the verkhovna rada, the council of ministers, the presidium of the verkhovna rada, and , of course, there was no local self-government, these were all state-owned, nationalized authorities, under the leadership and direction of the communist party of the soviet union, with the same, so-called the sixth article, you actually mentioned this sixth article, the guiding and guiding role, it was abolished by as much as 90%. year this article, but it is such an interesting moment, it is very nice and very beneficial to write in the constitution that only the soviet communist party should rule, that is, only the communist party, and accordingly, if some other party somehow gets into power, then what it does violates the constitution, that means it is illegal

that is the constitution.onstant effort to attack, attack, attack is a dress up as george washington and claim they support democracy. joe biden has done this his entire life he undermines character assassinates, sneers people really do believe in law and order and a true justice system and our constitution. while he pushes the opposite as i explained in some detail and left science program. what is this appointments clause? let's go to the constitution.congress.gov. what does congress say? article two section two clause two of your constitution. it says in part he, the president, shall nominate with the advice and consent of the senate, shall appoint ambassadors, ugly public ministers and councils, judges of the supreme court and all other officers of the united states whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for. which shall be established by law. so, you and i look at this constitutionally and say that it's pretty clear. while, the left of their lawyers, their justices, their lawyers look at thi

you have to amend the constitution and you can't amend constitution. so is so that's why we to find these workarounds now. but i do think that that because again, just to go back to the big theme, i believe they were very flexible and very entrepreneurial and forward thinking in their own way. and they would not want us to be so static and frozen. well, this went really fast, but we're already out of time. aj is going to be signing immediately after this in the activity center. encourage all of

day constitution tomorrow, and we are talking today, because it was today in the year 96 that the constitutionalegan, on which the constitution of ukraine was adopted. we will talk about this, about those events with yaroslav kendzyur, a public figure and a member of the dissident movement and people's deputy of the first and sixth convocations, meanwhile, you still have an opportunity until 12 o'clock. while we are on the air donating to our assembly, to our army for the 100th brigade of the armed forces of ukraine for drones, so that they can see our enemy with the help of those drones. the qr code is here, then the card number will appear here watch, and we remember the 96th year on june 27. mr. yaroslav, we are glad to see you, welcome to our studio, thank you for the invitation and happy public holiday tomorrow. thank you, ukrainians, i read somewhere, i do not consider... the day of the constitution of ukraine to be some kind of extraordinary holiday. i remember how i somehow got to poland on the day of the constitution of poland. ugh. and there literally everyone with flags, everyone goes

you have to amend the constitution and you can't amend constitution. so is so that's why we to find these workarounds now. but i do think that that because again, just to go back to the big theme, i believe they were very flexible and very entrepreneurial and forward thinking in their own way. and they would not want us to be so static and frozen. well, this went really fast, but we're already out of time. aj is going to be signing immediately after this in the activity center. encourage all of you to get a copy. it's a book and please join in thanking a j jacobs. thank you, holly and thank you. thank you for the lovely questions and yes, i will. i have several quibblesin 1976,g historian laurel thatcher, aldrich, whose specialty was the history of women early america, coined the that many of us have heard seen on a meme or perhaps even a t-shirt. well-behaved women seldom make history. she very well could have been talking. barbara walters,

sure it's acknowledged as part of the constitution and becomes part of the constitution. so there's an educational process here. why is that important? we want to make sure that we have our constituencies asking the right questions of our candidates so they'll vote the right way so we can complete the job on the equal rights amendment. and then secondly, the importance of the ratification of the equal rights amendment. because most -- many americans say, you know, it's 2024. do we really need an equal rights amendment in the constitution? the answer is clearly yes. and we need to educate the public as to what's happening in our courts and the needs, the different scrutinies that are available if the equal rights amendment becomes part of our constitution. >> hi, senator cardin. my name is katy, i led the advocacy group, the coalition of advocates in virginia for the virginia ratification. sen. cardin: congratulations. well done. >> thank you. many of us would love to see this important human rights discussion held in the larger understanding of our international reputatio

you have to amend the constitution and you can't amend constitution.se workarounds now. but i hi that because again, just to go back to the big theme, i believe they were very flexible and very entrepreneurial and forward thinking in their own way. so static and frozen. well, this went really fast, but we're

fact, a very cool constitution. no, look, this constitution was made by medvedchuk so that the state power in the country was dysfunctional, well, by mykhailo mykhailo syrota, the father of the constitution, no, the changes are in the 1996 year, 2004, the 96 year, by the way, is quite good was the constitution, the only thing that was a problem was to expand. the powers of the parliament to simplify the impeachment procedure, then the removal of the president, then they returned it again under yanukovych, they were not like that, look, i am a supporter, i am a supporter of the american model, where there is a president who answers and heads, heads the executive power, we have a problem, what is the problem in our state that people elect the president by universal suffrage, and he is responsible for everything that happens in the country, the prime minister is something incomprehensible. a person who is not chosen by some incomprehensible deputies, and we have a built-in confrontation between the president and the pr

compromise is built into the constitution and in a way, compromise with evil is built into the constitution because there is no clear sense from the constitution of whether slavery should be allowed or should not be allowed, that members of the founding generation determine what's the only way to put the country together. the creator situate in that i think people still believe today that will because the founders said it can't be wrong and as a result, african-americans have been battling even some of the most fundamental equality before the law and still are. conflict over slavery continues and in 1854, there is more interest in organizing new territory in that former area known as the louisiana purchase and lincoln's rival in illinois, stephen douglass, a democrat, wants to help get this territory organized. and so in 1854, he proposes something comes to be known as the kansas act. what he wants to do apply something called popular sovereignty to this new territory. popular sovereignty actually was something was part of the compromise of 1850 new territory that came in in new mexico and

you said, unless there is a serious constitutional question. >> it is a serious constitutional question whether a statute can be applied to the president's official acts. wouldn't you always interpret the statute not to apply to the president, even under your formulation unless congress has spoken with some clarity? >> i don't think across the board a constitutional question exists, applying any criminal ns statute to the president. >> the problem is the vague exception can be used against a lot of presidential activities, historically with creative prosecutor who wants to go after a president. >> let me try to -- >> that is what we are talking about historically, the risk, and going forward. you can take all of that. >> the question about the risk is very serious. obviously, it is a question that this court has to evaluate . for the executive branch, our view is that there is a balanced protection that better serves the interest of the constitution that incorporates both accountability and protections for the president. i want to go through the protections that do exist. perhaps it is

it's acknowledged as part of t constitution andecomes part of the constitution. so there's an education process here. why is that impornt? we wt to make sure that we have our constituencies asking the right qutions of our candidates so they'll vote the right way so we can complete the job on the equal rights amendment. an then secondly, the importance of the ratification of the equal rights amendment. because most -- many americans say, younow, it's 24. do we really need an equal rights amendment in the constitution? the answer is clearly yes. and we need to educate the public as to what's happening in our courts and the needs, the different scrutinies that are available if the equal rights amendment becomes part of our constitution. >> hi, senator cardin. my name is katy, i led the advocacy group, the coalition of advocates in virginia for the virginia ratification. sen. cardin: congratulations. well done. >> thank you. many of us would love to see this important human rights discussion held in the larger understanding of our international repution. in your fina

volodymyr, we congratulate you on the holy day of the constitution. good morning, the north-east defense corps of our country congratulates you, i also want to congratulate all ukrainians with the basic law on constitution day. congratulations. you are even vyshyvanians, i see that you are so serious about this important holiday. is there a festive mood in sumy oblast, how did the night pass, mr. volodymyr? if you look at the previous nights, the 27th to the morning of yesterday, there was such a record in my opinion, somewhere in the last year of such a small number of explosions there were no, there were only five explosions, but apparently the logistics of the moneylenders worked, and as of this morning there were already 102 explosions in the krasnopil community, anpyrekord was also placed, 21 kamikhadze drones. was dropped on the krasnopil community, so the rashists again began, let’s say so, to do their own, as always , their mischief, which they have been doing for the last two or more years, and people, despite the fact that the russian shelli

such as the constitutional court in turkey, the constitutional court in germany, the house of representatives and the house of commons in england which are in charge of both the role of monitoring the qualifications of election candidates and monitoring the accuracy of the elections. in iran, for 44 years, the guardian council has been responsible for ensuring the safety of elections and people's votes. fateme alikhani of sed and sima news agency. well, mr. rahpak, how have you seen this beginning and this first step of holding the presidential elections ? yes, you are expecting that the elections of this term are being held in a special situation, that is, because of the tragic incident that happened and the honorable president shahid and his companions. we lost attention to some of the principles of the constitution, which caused the elections we used to organize it in a limited time and those who are involved in this matter quickly made the arrangements. because we have to do all these things within 50 days , and according to the constitution, we have to reach the election of the president

and the constitution of the u.s. and making a mistake is not what lands you in a criminal prosecution. there has been some talk about the statutes issued in this case. i think they are tfairly described as statutes engaging in conspiracies to defraud the united states with respect to one of the most important functions, namely the certification of the next president. >> i want to dispute that particular application of that, 371 conspiracy to defraud the united states, the particular facts here. would you not agree that that is a peculiarly open-ended statutory prohibition? that fraud under that provision, unlike under most other fraud provisions, doesn't require any impairment of a property interest? >> it is designed to protect me the functions of the u.s. government and it's difficult to think of a more critical function than the certification of who won the election. >> as i said i'm not discussing the particular facts of the case, but it applies to any fraud that interferes seriously with any government operation

because this paragraph of the constitutional constitution has not been implemented , none of the laws passed in the country in the past 70 years have been implemented. because the condition of the legitimacy of these laws was the approval of at least 5 religious scholars, which was never implemented, so with this account, when all the 70 -year-old laws of the country are not based on the legitimacy of both the shura majlis the senate also fell out of legitimacy, the referendums that were held, and even the king who worked based on these laws, all of these were illegitimate. the people confirmed the illegitimacy of the entire governing body because on 22 bahman , they seized all the country's organs in the capital, and in this way , the constitutional regime, which did not follow its fundamental and unchangeable law, reached its end. a republic was declared, and on the other hand , the religious nature of the laws, like the previous regime, should not be ignored, which means that this republic should be islamic, not just a republic, not a democratic republic, not a democratic republic.

a few days later , the full text of the draft constitution will be published. the draft brings various discussions. the muslim congress on the transposition of iran's constitution has been held for two days in the ferdowsi hall of tehran university and continues for two weeks . they are discussing various articles of the draft constitution, and as its name suggests , it will be more about the islamic perspective and the rules and foundations of the islamic religion. one of the most important things that is being criticized is the conditions that are mentioned for the presidency, many of the brief conditions that have been mentioned are that the president of iran must be a muslim and a subordinate. be iran this is not enough. because he may be muslim. but the shia religion does not have twelve days. even though our constitution is basically according to islam is twelver shia, so here being a muslim should be added to be a twelver shia, firstly, secondly , it is a condition to be the president of islam in terms of all the qualities and privileges, because the pre

of ukraine (i quote) the right to determine and change the constitutional system in ukraine belongse people and cannot be usurped by the state, its bodies or officials. in addition, such actions fall under article 109 the criminal code of ukraine, which specifically refers to the violent change or overthrow of the constitutional order or the seizure of state power, as well. in a conspiracy to commit such acts. in 2014, such usurpation was justified in the name of revolution. and now there are military actions, but the meaning of this does not change. in essence, we are talking about a conspiracy between the executive power of ukraine, the leadership of the verkhovna rada, and the parliamentary majority controlled by it, aimed at usurping state power. differently it is impossible to name, which is a criminal offense under ukrainian law. further, the constitution of ukraine does not provide for the possibility of canceling or postponing elections of the country's president, or the continuation of his powers in connection with martial law, for which. now they refer to what is in the uk

during the period of preparation for the constitution of ninety-four, there was a lot of controversy, our republic in form. an archaic document, it required a radical change by the early nineties, it turned into revisions, two working groups took on it and decided that it would be based on traditions, which would be supplemented by advanced world experience, but looking through the prism of democratic... transformation of the preservation of social guarantees, it turned out that even the closest western neighbors do not have this in pomina. the approaches of russia, which decided on its development strategy a year earlier, were closer in spirit. the developers suggested about three dozen options, added and crossed out, argued and agreed. what was duplicated from project to project was preserved. this is how the first fundamental law of independent belarus was created. we declared ourselves as a unitary, democratic, social, legal state, the people were put at the forefront, the people were defined as the only source of state power, and for the first time the institution of the preside

it is all documented laid out from the constitution. let me also remind you that following the commencement of this special military operation, the west initiated a vigorous and quite on diplomatic campaign, aimed at isolating russia on the global stage. if you remember what it is now evident to everyone that this attempt has failed to equipment. however, the west has not abandoned its goal of forming an international coalition of sorts against russia and maintaining a facade of pressure on our country to come for a new place. we are fully aware of this saturday as well. as you may be aware, there has been active promotion of the initiatives to convene the so called high level international conference in switzerland, on peace and ukraine, and doing some more over. they intend to hold it shortly after the jew 7 summit, and you're saying, you know, that as those who essentially fuel the conflict in ukraine through the policies of the organizes of the meeting in switzerland up proposing. yet another maneuver to divert attention and distort

the constitution is george washington is the father of the constitution for his father of the officerimousl reelected. it's washington's constitution and this is relative. it's all about making sure we be going to come after us again it's the work what it is about. read yourion. it's common defense. a p for common sense that phrase appears in the articles of confederationid saif you cannot have a common offense about money. they are not paying the constitutions about national tan revolution is no taxation without representation. now since you are going to be presented in this new constitution they're going to tax you good and hard and updow. what is the longest section of the constitution? article one us what is the longt section? section eight is the p the longt section of the first and longes- article congress shall have power to lay and c taxes duties and excises. sometimes if you're really lucky law will tell you it and provide common defense and general welfare of the united preamble. but manitoba uniforms out the united states they have to pay equally. they have a constitut for

he accepted the constitution. one should not rebel against the constitution . one should not read anything more than the constitution and ask for something. the constitution has defined all the limits. during this time, when everyone wrote and said so much, we sat in silence to respect the order of the imam and to respect what we wanted. the law is above all that the nation should not be divided. why should mr. president say in his speech that if the president is tried, another revolution will be necessary. why is the president in islamic law for the honor of islam, this is no different from the members of the people, and this is the honor of islam at the same time. 120 representatives. people want to raise the issue of the political inadequacy of the president in the parliament. this work is welcomed by the people. the representatives of the islamic council, brothers and sisters, who have visited your homes , call you "veer najm" and i announce to you on their behalf that your representatives understood your call with their conscience before this. finally, in

two terms, according to the constitution now. understand that after some time, our generation will leave, but they will come. dictates the following amendments: we have ruled out military aggression against other states, thus protecting ourselves from rash actions. the same applies to the use of the atom, in our country it is only peaceful, while we do not exclude the right to defend one’s state, in order not to stray from the course, the preservation of historical memory and traditional family values ​​have been enshrined in the constitution, as well as the concept of marriage as a union of a man and a woman, and invariably consulted with belarusians before... the principles of free, accessible, high-quality. and the time has come for us to understand that the basic law is not a set of benefits, it is a series of guarantees that the state provides, and increasing personal responsibility is just another step towards the model of interaction between the state and partner, which was enshrined in the resolution. as a result, during

law of russia, and therefore, they are holding a referendum, which, by the way, contradicts the constitutional of ukraine. let's say, you remember the last annexation, they proclaimed an independent state, zaporizhia oblast, they didn't even start the people's republic to invent why this independent state, zaporizhia oblast, as well as the independent state of kherson oblast were. unification with the russian federation as a state, well, yes, you know, you can declare any district within ukraine a state and join it, which, which matters, the district, this district, the city, whatever you want, it’s simple, to things, the city, the city-state of sevastopol, was annexed to the russian federation as a state, and this is not a joke, this is a legal document, the constitutional court of the russian federation. the accession of the state of sevastopol to russia was approved, there was such a state for a few days, and that state, as you remember, did not even have a leader, the document with putin on the accession of the state of sevastopol to the russian federation was signed by the people's mayor

law of russia, and therefore they hold a referendum, which, by the way, contradicts the constitutional ukraine. let's say, do you remember the last annexation, they declared zaporizhzhia oblast an independent state, they didn't even become a people's republic? you are imagining why this independent state zaporizhia oblast, as well as the independent state kherson oblast, were annexed to the russian federation as a state. you, well, you know, that's how the state can do it declare any district as a part of ukraine and join it, which, what matters, the region, this district, the city, whatever you want, it's just, by the way, the city, the city-state of sevastopol was annexed to the russian federation, as a state, and this is not a joke, this is a legal document, the constitutional court of the russian federation, the federal assembly, the president of russia approved... the accession to russia of the state of sevastopol, there was such a state for several days, and in this state, as you remember, not even there was a leader, a document with putin on the accession of the state sevastopol

constitution and southerners in particular, believed that the constitution owed them.into free territory and they could look at the dred scott opinion as proof of that. they could look at the fugitive slave act as proof of that. northerners believed that, yeah, there we s responsibility that they had to return fugitive slaves to their legal owners. but that as a nation, we needed to remain committed to eventually eradicating from the country, to be truly a republic and not a slaveholding american history, united states history, as one long civil rights movement. ther't a time in our past where there wasn't a gap between what we profess to we actually . there is some pgr sometimes then down by those who oppose. there had been some black men were able to vote during the revolutionary period and many of their rights are taken away. white women in newrevolution. there were laws passed to make sure that would not be the case. we don't really have a democracy in the united un■átil after the 1960s. and so the process involved in trying to get those rights was hard understand

constitution. but when people traveled from state, state or into the district of, columbia, which is not a state, it and it became more possible to invoke the united states constitution petition because interstate issues were involved. and so the privileges and immunities clause you're talking about article four, section two, sort of says something in the language as people acknowledged back and now is pretty ambiguous. it says something about state citizenship and kind of the rights of citizens of the state to be entitled to the privileges and immunities of citizens of the several states. and what that meant for free african-americans was kind of unclear. and had and and the kind of ability to make constitutional claims under that part, the constitution was it was a very new situation. we're talking about the early of the constitution itself. and so i argue that beginning i mean, with greater and greater intensity, beginning with the missouri compromise, which in which the debates in congress sign

happy constitution day, slava ukraine. we are coming back, dear friends, and with us is stepan havrysh, the first deputy secretary of the national security council of ukraine in 2008-2011. mr. stepan, we are glad to see you. mutual thanks, glory to ukraine. glory to the heroes, you know, while we had a break, andriy and i will talk about it... in a few words, i say who is our current secretary of the national security council, and we somehow thought about it, because after the media danilov, a completely non-media person appeared man, there is no one to answer even to mr. medvedev's next drunken ramblings, but the secretary of the security council is lytvynenko, he was this is the head of the foreign intelligence service, and once worked. including in the staff department of the nsdc, in my time when i was the first deputy secretary of the nsdc, he is a trained professional person, although it is clear that the very internal policy of the president's office is to appoint loyal, absolutely obedient speakers to all key posit

constitution day is the only public holiday that is enshrined directly in the basic law. to find out more interesting and up-to-date information, follow the updates on our website espresso.tv, as well as on our social networks, we will see each other less often, in less than an hour, my colleagues lesya vakulyuk and andriy saichuk will be waiting for you on the air. of our telethon, the espresso tv channel, this well sir, we congratulate everyone who joins the marathon, starting 856 days ago, and this is exactly what happened when russia was invaded from russia, crowds of russian, how should we call them, barbarians, attacked us, since then , the heroic resistance of ukraine, the struggle for independence, the war in this century for the ukrainian independent ... to exist, the ukrainian nation was being formed, and you and i have been going on we follow the events, we must be informed , since a stable and effective democracy must be preserved in ukraine, this is one of the conditions that ukraine is a guarantee that ukraine will become a successful country after the war,

that is y ended up in the constitution. nothing kehat ended up in the constitution for the president and that ibeuse one of the chief cces of the framers was the risk of presidential misconduct. they labored over this. theydoed an impeachment structure that separated removal omffice as a political remedy from criminal prosecutio this departed from the british model. thbrish model was you get impeached and criminally prosecuted andoncted in the same proceeding. e amers did not want that. they wanted a political remedy in case a president was engaging in conduct that daered the nation. he could be removed. he can't be prosecuted as a sitting president. that has been a long-standing justice dertment position. >> you dispute propositions that a former president has some form of immunity, but as i understand your argument, you do recognize that a former president has a rm of special protection, namely that statutes thaar applicable to everodmust be interpreted differently under some circumstances when applied to a former preside

the constitution was written in 1787.springfield, then peoria, and delivers these addresses where he calls on americans to stick to the principles of the founding. at one point in the speech, he says, our republican robe is soiled and trailed in the dust, and he calls on americans to re purify that republican, to wash it, clean to cling back to the principles oth idea that slavery was on the path to ion. this is my favorite lincoln document. it from proverbs a word fitfully spoken is like a gold in pictures of silver. and what's interesting to me about this is this is just a fragment of wrote. and we don't have the beginning. and i can tell you whatch is tht the apple of gold is the declaratio says so himself. but judging everything else he's ever said about, the declaration of independence,■l he's specifically talking about equal ity among human beings, that all endowed by their creator with the right to be alive, the right to be free and the right■e to pursue happiness and slavery has no parties. ■;kone 1854. there's an

will it be fair if some of these appear in the constitution of north macedonia?onians don't want to see. it's unfair, but they can join the european union, or they can sit with their justice in... er, hallway, for another 20 years, and we will sit together with her and talk about what a terrible orbit. i 'm not telling you that these demands, the demands are fair, listen to me, i'm telling you that in any case, a country that is a member of the european union has much more opportunities to prove itself right than a country that aspires to be there . hungarians simply had time before us, if we behaved like hungarians, we would now set conditions for the hungarians. well, this is another question, here comes the question of what we have been doing for 30 years, well, this is another discussion, in general, i think that what do you know, how did the macedonians behave when they told the bulgarians that they needed constitutional recognition of minorities, the bulgarian minority, we said, we are doing it together with other national minorities, constituting the statu

we will legislate a constitutional standard.-- of its skis and taking more power than it it should be narrowing these quon that -- if we give anyone power and they don't have any checks and balances, if through the speed limit. i think that is what we are seeing on the supreme court. there needs to be a disincti be. i think it's very disturbing that the court has to manufacture immunity, whatever flavor it is. if it goes beyond january 6, which it sounds like the court is going to do, that ier you are republican or democrat can come back to bite the american people. host: on the line for go ahead, virginia. please turn down the volume on your tv. caller: i have a question regarding the gun■■b i think she stated somethiaboute suicides. gun owners having them in their a pistol, or whatever. i understood that it was domestic morthan likely? the wife? i'm curious what the cor■ was. i did not know 50% were suicides. i stand corrected if so. guest:■& don't have the actual statistical numbers, that i have interviewed experts on gun saf

and the reason is that the real constitution of the soviet uni union, think of the word constitution.an they bill it means a structure. there is a sound structure of the real constitution of the soviet union which is what our framers that debated that whole summer in philadelphia in 1787. they did not talk about the bill of rights. that was an afterthought, wasn't it? that constitution of the soviet union did not prevent the centralization of power. in one person or in one party. when that happens the game is over. the bill of rights is just what our framers would call a parchment guarantee. so the real key to the distinctiveness of america is the structure of our government. one part is the independence of the judiciary. but there's a lot more. mark: separation of powers is the key. you know, they talked about mix that governs the agents, aristotle and others jon locke talked about different branches of government. the federalist papers on numerous occasions they talked about that legislative, executive and the judicial. and he is quoting in the federalist papers it's crucial to our

this is the constitution of the united states of america.be adhered to this is the law of the land. is that clear? now dou chops people, for pete six. >> any other questions for wrap conference. thank you all for being again andas time to comply with our request. bring us the tapes we see it. we want to hear it and if you don't the vote will be called up will holdn inherent a vote will come to the floor i encourage you all to ely white house what indeed they are hiding what is garland highlighting and thank you so much for cg guys. [inaudible ♪ >> discover the heartbeat of democracy with c-span's voices 2024 as we engage voters ahead of the first debate this electionsking, what issue would you like for them to address and why? >> i amy fr laurel, maryland, and what i would like to see othe presidential debate is a conversation on how to solve problems. i want specifics like how to solve equal housing, affordable housing. education opportunity for children. >> at like to see happen in the debate this coming a disavowal meant by both candidate