0
0.0
Jul 3, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
on that court. he had been used to writing an opinion for himself in basically every case, there was idea of being unanimous or having the chief justice write the court's opinion. but he said well, once i got here, i got, quote, nothing lectures about how terrible it was when the virginia high abandoned the practice of having its head issue opinions on the court's and went back to having everybody their own opinion kind of in a bit of a free for all. okay. well, who was giving these lectures? right. so the first thought would be, well, it's the two justices from virginia who practiced before that court and closely followed that court, as i mentioned earlier. justice wrote two volumes of case reports on that court. okay. now, in the next part of letter justice, johnson decided to talk about what he thought about his colleagues. this one's too old. this one can't write. this one's no. okay. then he gets to washington and marshall and he to jefferson. well, as you know, they are commonly esteemed as on
on that court. he had been used to writing an opinion for himself in basically every case, there was idea of being unanimous or having the chief justice write the court's opinion. but he said well, once i got here, i got, quote, nothing lectures about how terrible it was when the virginia high abandoned the practice of having its head issue opinions on the court's and went back to having everybody their own opinion kind of in a bit of a free for all. okay. well, who was giving these lectures?...
0
0.0
Jul 21, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
recuses himself or herself, they have an eight judge court, a justice court. and so the court's own ethical guidelines make very clear that justices have a special obligation to sit and not to recuse themselves. but to me, that means justices also have a cochairman is equally strong obligation, not to get themselves into situations where they have to recuse themselves. works both ways. very good. i, i guess i wonder, given the fact that we're past the moment, people have not recused themselves have taken in the case of one justice something like $4 million worth of gifts over time. what what do you see? do you see any way that that chief justice roberts or the court can repair the damage now and one of the things you do write about in the book i think is is that you think maybe in the long term term limits would be good for. four justices of 18 years, i think is what suggested. but do you see any short term as well as long term changes that might really fix the court? no, i never been a fan of the big i've never been a fan of adding more justices. i just don't
recuses himself or herself, they have an eight judge court, a justice court. and so the court's own ethical guidelines make very clear that justices have a special obligation to sit and not to recuse themselves. but to me, that means justices also have a cochairman is equally strong obligation, not to get themselves into situations where they have to recuse themselves. works both ways. very good. i, i guess i wonder, given the fact that we're past the moment, people have not recused themselves...
0
0.0
Jul 29, 2024
07/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court reform.this that he thinks that could activate democrats to vote and something that he thinks is right for country at this point. >> we started hearing about this in that period, the month after the debate when he was scrambling to save his -- his candidacy. you said he was going to run on this. has this been in the pipeline for a long time and even though we got highlighted in that period, this is something that he was going to do one way or another. >> i think the immunity decision when they saw that coming was the last straw. he thought this was above the pail. and biden is old school. you talk to people like ted kaufman, people around this president for a long time, he does believe that you have to put ideas before the american people and run on them in order to implement them. so in the darkest moments of build back better when he was arguing the first couple of years in office, one of the things that he would say to the democrats that were resistant to go all the way in terms of the pol
court reform.this that he thinks that could activate democrats to vote and something that he thinks is right for country at this point. >> we started hearing about this in that period, the month after the debate when he was scrambling to save his -- his candidacy. you said he was going to run on this. has this been in the pipeline for a long time and even though we got highlighted in that period, this is something that he was going to do one way or another. >> i think the immunity...
0
0.0
Jul 29, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the court dated -- did it. there is a set of factors that you look to to decide whether to overrule cases, because sometimes it is important to overrule an old case, but really noen -- none of those factors which have to do with change circumstances in society, none of them apply. the court basically said we think courts should have more power and agency should have less power than chevron decided. i have to say consistent with what is clearly of you of this court, that agency decision-making needs to be reined in or taken back. this is hardly the only case in which this has happened. the west virginia case of a few years ago, in which the court really enhanced the major questions doctrine. another case of last term and which of the court insisted that many agencies go to courts rather than use in house decision-making even when some of these agencies do not have the power to go to courts, so you are stripping them of all enforcement authority, and really it is other ways. the court is made clear if things so t
the court dated -- did it. there is a set of factors that you look to to decide whether to overrule cases, because sometimes it is important to overrule an old case, but really noen -- none of those factors which have to do with change circumstances in society, none of them apply. the court basically said we think courts should have more power and agency should have less power than chevron decided. i have to say consistent with what is clearly of you of this court, that agency decision-making...
0
0.0
Jul 3, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
what's happening in the courts, the supreme court, is not great.t's terrible in many respects -- [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2024] >> we're going to leave this program but you can watch it in its entirety as we take you live to the white house where president biden will be making -- ♪ announcer: please bow as we mark this occasion in prayer. almighty god. giver of currently and strength -- courage and strength to all those who seek your face, we thank you for your presence with us today as we gather to bestow our nation's highest honor upon these valiant souls whose bold and heroic actions remind us of the price so many have paid for the sake of liberty and justice for all. while our nation pauses to remember the enduring legacy of privates george d. wilson and phillip g. shadrack, help us to hold fast the principles that they so bravely defended and help us to hold high the light of liberty
what's happening in the courts, the supreme court, is not great.t's terrible in many respects -- [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2024] >> we're going to leave this program but you can watch it in its entirety as we take you live to the white house where president biden will be making -- ♪ announcer: please bow as we mark this...
0
0.0
Jul 16, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
or a 16 member court. ct. . what would the advice be? >>>> i don't think of them as tension with each other. you can be a good and strong judge and also be a good colleague and that is part of being a good and strong judge. i think people make different decisions and have different perspectives on my court anyway about something you write separately. i am a little bit of an institutionalist so i don't write separately or that often. i write distants when i need to write a descendent and i hope i write strong and powerful dissents and i view that as an important part of what i do. a really important a part of what i do. but i don't, i try not to be if you look at people, usually a road down. to the extent the court can, the court shouldn't be fractured. that is different for that. it is basically not about individual judges but the court as a whole. i try not to be -- have this to say, a very wide spectrum on the court. i want to express my individual point of view when i joined the majority opinion, for me
or a 16 member court. ct. . what would the advice be? >>>> i don't think of them as tension with each other. you can be a good and strong judge and also be a good colleague and that is part of being a good and strong judge. i think people make different decisions and have different perspectives on my court anyway about something you write separately. i am a little bit of an institutionalist so i don't write separately or that often. i write distants when i need to write a descendent...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the court gave some guidance to the lower court as to how to get through this but there really is a lot to be done. the other significant thing that came out of this ruling is the court also said that some of these activities that are official acts and cannot be viewed, for which the president has absolute immunity, cannot be a part of this trial at all. that information cannot be ud in evidence at this trial. lewis: great to get your analysis both. thank you very much for coming on the program. around the world and across the u.k., you are watching bbc news. lewis: this is bbc news. let's turn now to an election happening this week, the first round of france's parliamentary elections have seen the far right make an historic gain. marine le pen's far right national rally came out with more than a third of the vote followed by the left-wing coalition. the party of the curnt president and third -- in third. andrew harding has the latest. >> paris, the day after, and for many a profound sense of shock. it is like having a hangover, a legal assistant of yesterday's election results. >> peop
the court gave some guidance to the lower court as to how to get through this but there really is a lot to be done. the other significant thing that came out of this ruling is the court also said that some of these activities that are official acts and cannot be viewed, for which the president has absolute immunity, cannot be a part of this trial at all. that information cannot be ud in evidence at this trial. lewis: great to get your analysis both. thank you very much for coming on the...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
we saw the court deliver in circumstances that proved the court's integrity.ved the supreme court's integrity and now former republican president, donald trump, has disproved a. andrew, that, without that supreme court decision in the nixon case, we wouldn't be sitting here so stunned tonight, as we are. >> yeah, look, we talked about off air, in many ways, his decision, quietly pushes the entire logic of the nixon tapes case because you have this broad recognition by the supreme court that anything that is within a very expensive view of the court functions or the take care clause of the constitution is completely and 100% absolutely immune. and when even other official acts, there is a strong presumption when the court set out a very difficult test to allow it to go forward. let me just make sure people understand with respect to the core function when the court says it is absolutely immune, they say one of the things in that core function is the communications and the directions of the president and the department of justice. so they say that when a preside
we saw the court deliver in circumstances that proved the court's integrity.ved the supreme court's integrity and now former republican president, donald trump, has disproved a. andrew, that, without that supreme court decision in the nixon case, we wouldn't be sitting here so stunned tonight, as we are. >> yeah, look, we talked about off air, in many ways, his decision, quietly pushes the entire logic of the nixon tapes case because you have this broad recognition by the supreme court...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
he should be in court now fo the charges pending against him, and that the supreme court has decided just don't understand. it is like we are headed for a dictatorship because of what trump has already said. host: i want t what former callers said, that the presidency has special official duties and k certain things the rest of us do not know so they have to be prosecution.om criminal what do you make of that argument? trump has done, they are talking about sending out troops or sending people into war situations. that i do not think is president unle h■a now, i don't know what isng to happen to our country now. trump, what he has done is total crimin. he has asked people to overturn their preference for presi. he has gone to try to talk. they have him on the phone trying to get the person in georgia to give him 11,000 more votes. what more do you need? he is a criminal. this is not anything to do with the presidency. it is just that he wants to be back in that office so he can completely destroy our host: charles in tennessee, line for democrats, good morning. caller: yes, ma'am. ye
he should be in court now fo the charges pending against him, and that the supreme court has decided just don't understand. it is like we are headed for a dictatorship because of what trump has already said. host: i want t what former callers said, that the presidency has special official duties and k certain things the rest of us do not know so they have to be prosecution.om criminal what do you make of that argument? trump has done, they are talking about sending out troops or sending people...
0
0.0
Jul 1, 2024
07/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the court system here and then when ultimately it did go pass the appeals court court and supreme courtided it was going to get in. it's not that they've taken their time, but you will note this is the last case they're deciding and this term no, no one said it had to be the last case. you decide in this term they could have issued their decision earlier. so the delay or the time it has taken has made this almost impossible, almost for this to go to trial before lecture, there should be happening any minute, jake, let's get back to you. thanks, anderson. and let's talk about this issue of immunity and what it means. jamie can go let me start with you what does it mean to jack smith? what does it mean to voters? this idea that what the court's going to rule on. so apart from the question of whether we can have this trial before the election if, there is a trial on any part of it, it's going on during the campaign but if there isn't a trial american voters don't get to hear the evidence. >> they don't get to your the grand jury testimony from people like former chief of staff, mark meadow
the court system here and then when ultimately it did go pass the appeals court court and supreme courtided it was going to get in. it's not that they've taken their time, but you will note this is the last case they're deciding and this term no, no one said it had to be the last case. you decide in this term they could have issued their decision earlier. so the delay or the time it has taken has made this almost impossible, almost for this to go to trial before lecture, there should be...
0
0.0
Jul 30, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court, and we need it now.cheers and applause] my fellow americans, based in all of my experience, i am certain we need these reforms. we need these reforms to restore trust in the courts, preserve the system of checks and balances that are vital to our democracy, but also commonsense reforms, which the vast majority of the american people support as well as leading constitutional law scholars, progressives, and conservatives. i look forward to working with congress to implement these necessary reforms. i know there are members of congress here today. let me close with this. president johnson signed the civil rights act of 1964 just two days before the fourth of july. he said in that bill signing, and i quote, "this is a proud triumph. if those who founded our country but their freedom would be secure only if each generation fought to renew." throughout my career i have been inspired by the cause of civil-rights. [applause] that is what got me involved. initially. my state was a state that was segregated by law
court, and we need it now.cheers and applause] my fellow americans, based in all of my experience, i am certain we need these reforms. we need these reforms to restore trust in the courts, preserve the system of checks and balances that are vital to our democracy, but also commonsense reforms, which the vast majority of the american people support as well as leading constitutional law scholars, progressives, and conservatives. i look forward to working with congress to implement these necessary...
0
0.0
Jul 19, 2024
07/24
by
PRESSTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
be examined, the court now turn to these policies and practices beginning with israel. question a posed by the general assembly inquires in part about the legal consequences arising from israel's settlement policy. the court consider in this regard that the distinction that is sometimes made between settlements and outposts is immaterial for the purpose. of ascertaining whether the communities in question form part of israel settlement policy. what matters is whether they are established or maintained with israel support. the court further notes that between 1967 and 2005, israel settlement policy was carried out in the west bank each jerusalem and the gaza strip. since the removal of israel settlement from the gaza strip in 2005, israel settlement policy has continued in the west bank and in jerusalem, the court therefore limits its analysis to israel's ongoing settlement policy in the west bank east jerusalem. at the same time, the court observes that israel settlement policy carried in the gaza strip until 2005 was not substantially different from the policy that continues in the wes
be examined, the court now turn to these policies and practices beginning with israel. question a posed by the general assembly inquires in part about the legal consequences arising from israel's settlement policy. the court consider in this regard that the distinction that is sometimes made between settlements and outposts is immaterial for the purpose. of ascertaining whether the communities in question form part of israel settlement policy. what matters is whether they are established or...
0
0.0
Jul 16, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court fellows program lecture. i have the honor and privilege of serving the wall library of congress. it is my pleasure to send greetings hey the library serves as custodian of legal and legislative collection for nearly 3 million items. our foreign wall specialist a diverse prgroup of foreign trained attorneys who provide foreign law research and analysis to all three branches of government. each month the law library hosts free webinars we invite you to sign up for the webinars on our website. at this time i would like to ask you please silence your phones and also please ask to refrain from taking any audio or video recordings or photos of the event. with that i would like to introduce the counselor to the chief justice of the supreme court of the united states judge robert m downey junior thank you. thank you so much. a sincere thanks to doctor hayden and everyone here at the library of congress for hosting the 2024 supreme court fellows program electric. i'm honored to welcome you here today executive directo
supreme court fellows program lecture. i have the honor and privilege of serving the wall library of congress. it is my pleasure to send greetings hey the library serves as custodian of legal and legislative collection for nearly 3 million items. our foreign wall specialist a diverse prgroup of foreign trained attorneys who provide foreign law research and analysis to all three branches of government. each month the law library hosts free webinars we invite you to sign up for the webinars on...
0
0.0
Jul 16, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> i had arguments in district courts. i never had an appellate court.i practiced pretty young and had been an academic and government lawyer and policymaker. so it was my first appellate argument ever that was a little bit petrifying. now on the other hand, i can't really tell you that i thought the fate of campaign-finance rested on my shoulders because it was so clear what they were going to do. >> i almost talked myself into thinking -- >> i don't think in this case where the issue. you should argue about whether the cases should be overruled. we are going to hear this case againga in the next year and particularly address the breathing whether the cases should be overruled. i thought the answer was going to be yes they should be overruled. >> i thought that the pressure was off a little bit. not to say that it wasn't still a little bit scary, but one of the great things about the office is you work with magnificent people to pass the collection of lawyers. i remember i had a few sentences prepared to say first thing before the questions started. i f
>> i had arguments in district courts. i never had an appellate court.i practiced pretty young and had been an academic and government lawyer and policymaker. so it was my first appellate argument ever that was a little bit petrifying. now on the other hand, i can't really tell you that i thought the fate of campaign-finance rested on my shoulders because it was so clear what they were going to do. >> i almost talked myself into thinking -- >> i don't think in this case where...
0
0.0
Jul 3, 2024
07/24
by
ALJAZ
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the courts are critical, the trust and those courts to be independent as critical. and we've seen the erosion of that trust in re some years. certainly during the years of which donald trump was president, but to reduce all of america's democracy simply to the courts and not to recognize that americans democracy at many points in our history has had moments where, you know, pro chest civil society engagement, all sorts of aspects of society of come together to force and call for social change. you know, at the, when it goes well, you should be able to work through this course. but i think what we're seeing now is that pushback is going to be i, it was going to need to be located elsewhere in the us that a president biden is clearly, you know, going at this, taking this message and saying it's gotta be at the ballot box, i think many people for very long time have felt that the way that donald trump needs to be defeated. these are those people who feel like he is a threat to the norms as well as the laws that underpin america's democracy. many people have felt that t
the courts are critical, the trust and those courts to be independent as critical. and we've seen the erosion of that trust in re some years. certainly during the years of which donald trump was president, but to reduce all of america's democracy simply to the courts and not to recognize that americans democracy at many points in our history has had moments where, you know, pro chest civil society engagement, all sorts of aspects of society of come together to force and call for social change....
0
0.0
Jul 15, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court. it is hard because they all have a lot to say and they are trying to speak to each other sometimes you're just getting in the way. [laughter] there having a nice conversation and whether you get a word in edge wise but interesting cases. i'm sorry, could you just pulled off and wait a few years less my first case the argument of citizens united this campaign finance case and it had not gone well for the government came on to the court, one of my associates have on the argument and the last day of the year is that in particular in the cases about the intersection in the first amendment could tell from the order they were easily ready to overturn so it was appropriate so that was my first thing that i have arguments my first appellate ever kind of aware of the certain and everybody would be watching me. on the other hand the campaign-finance rest of on my shoulders because it was not clear what the court would do. >> i always talk myself into thinking i could win. [laughter] >> for the
the supreme court. it is hard because they all have a lot to say and they are trying to speak to each other sometimes you're just getting in the way. [laughter] there having a nice conversation and whether you get a word in edge wise but interesting cases. i'm sorry, could you just pulled off and wait a few years less my first case the argument of citizens united this campaign finance case and it had not gone well for the government came on to the court, one of my associates have on the...
0
0.0
Jul 4, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. but i think, again, to play a role in some of these structural cases about democracy is a particular privilege. >> let me echo everything paul said about what a pleasure it is to be here and have this discussion with both of you, such good friends and amazing people. i am looking forward to this. so, in addition to everything paul said, there is another, to me, quite interesting dimension to these kinds of cases, which is, as an advocate, i think makes them interesting and challenging. that is that they invariably have some kind of partisan valence to them. in that, there is a sense that the rules that one or another of the parties in front of the court is arguing for our rules that will confer some kind of political advantage or disadvantage. i do not know how you feel about that, paul, but i think that is a challenge to me in arguing these cases. because you want to try your best to subtract that out. certainly, of your presentation. and it to the extent you can, subtract that out o
supreme court. but i think, again, to play a role in some of these structural cases about democracy is a particular privilege. >> let me echo everything paul said about what a pleasure it is to be here and have this discussion with both of you, such good friends and amazing people. i am looking forward to this. so, in addition to everything paul said, there is another, to me, quite interesting dimension to these kinds of cases, which is, as an advocate, i think makes them interesting and...
0
0.0
Jul 29, 2024
07/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the court and destroy the court.o their initiatives coming from biden will be dead on arrival in the senate. they have no desire to make the court better. they're just trying to make it more liberal. >> what about term limits for supreme court justices? put aside the issue of packing or adding justices -- >> no. no. no. no. no. it's worked -- they didn't complain about any of this when the court was pumping out opinions they liked. only when we brought constitutional balance back from having a conservative court was the court a threat to the country. what's been a threat to the country is an out-of-control liberal court issuing opinions that basically take over every phase of american life based on nine people's judgment. so this roberts' court has brought constitutional balance back to the country, and one of the issues on the ballot in 2024 is what kind of court do you want. if you left it up to elizabeth warren to pick the court you would have the most liberal court in the history of the world and kamala harris wo
the court and destroy the court.o their initiatives coming from biden will be dead on arrival in the senate. they have no desire to make the court better. they're just trying to make it more liberal. >> what about term limits for supreme court justices? put aside the issue of packing or adding justices -- >> no. no. no. no. no. it's worked -- they didn't complain about any of this when the court was pumping out opinions they liked. only when we brought constitutional balance back...
0
0.0
Jul 25, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
up in court round up. watch coverage on all of the tv and cable stations to your hearts content of the supreme court. you can read about the supreme court term all the newspapers and periodicals. you can listen to an analysis of the supreme court term on radio and podcasts in the internet. you can even, heaven forbid go to another organization supreme court round up. but and savored the insight and analysis you really don't understand what has transpired at the courtship. so thank you for being here. a word or two on paul he is known to so many i'm going to be extremely brief is the 43rd solicitor general of the united states after serving as acting solicitor general as he is served as principal deputy solicitor general for three years. he has argued over 100 cases of the supreme court. let that soak in for a minute. as you absorb a 100 cases for context i will let you know that is about wonder more than i have argued in front of a supreme court. that's an extraordinary accomplishment in and of itself. in
up in court round up. watch coverage on all of the tv and cable stations to your hearts content of the supreme court. you can read about the supreme court term all the newspapers and periodicals. you can listen to an analysis of the supreme court term on radio and podcasts in the internet. you can even, heaven forbid go to another organization supreme court round up. but and savored the insight and analysis you really don't understand what has transpired at the courtship. so thank you for being...
0
0.0
Jul 19, 2024
07/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
notice to the court and did not actually - to the court and did not actually appear— to the court and actually appear in front _ to the court and did not actually appear in front of _ to the court and did not actually appear in front of it. _ to the court and did not actually appear in front of it. now- to the court and did not actually appear in front of it. now they i to the court and did not actually - appear in front of it. now they have said that _ appear in front of it. now they have said that it— appear in front of it. now they have said that it is— appear in front of it. now they have said that it is something _ appear in front of it. now they have said that it is something that- appear in front of it. now they have said that it is something that is- said that it is something that is very— said that it is something that is very much— said that it is something that is very much against _ said that it is something that is very much against what - said that it is something that is very much against what they i said that it is something that is- very much against what they believe
notice to the court and did not actually - to the court and did not actually appear— to the court and actually appear in front _ to the court and did not actually appear in front of _ to the court and did not actually appear in front of it. _ to the court and did not actually appear in front of it. now- to the court and did not actually appear in front of it. now they i to the court and did not actually - appear in front of it. now they have said that _ appear in front of it. now they have...
0
0.0
Jul 29, 2024
07/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> court was actually enforcing those requirements, but they are not the court is not so policing the court is not dealing with the obvious conflicts of interest we need a mandatory code of ethics for the supreme court, and we need it now my fellow americans based in all my experience i'm certainly need these reforms you need these reforms restore trust in the courts, preserve this system of checks and balances that are vital to our democracy were also common sense reforms the vast majority of american people support as well as leading constitutional law scholars progressive and conservatives i look forward to working with the congress to implement these necessary forms. >> a number of members of congress here today let me close this president johnson signed the civil rights act of 1964 just two days before 4 july he said in that bill signing, and i quote this is a proud trial those who founded our country the freedom would be secure only if each generation fought to renew and the largest enlarges meaning. and the quote that's what i've tried to do throughout my career. inspired by th
>> court was actually enforcing those requirements, but they are not the court is not so policing the court is not dealing with the obvious conflicts of interest we need a mandatory code of ethics for the supreme court, and we need it now my fellow americans based in all my experience i'm certainly need these reforms you need these reforms restore trust in the courts, preserve this system of checks and balances that are vital to our democracy were also common sense reforms the vast...
0
0.0
Jul 21, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it wasn't a case that was in the supreme court at the time the court did grant it and the court did not think it was doing anything new. justice stevens about the court was applying the same as it had been applying for 40 years. in giving due weight or respect to the use of the agency. and the issue before the court whether or not the word source in the clean air act should refer to an individual discrete smokestack or admission for a minute from a larger building or facility of the whole was in the question of technical expertise. it wasn't a question of scientific analysis. the reagan administration want to find it more broadly because it would make it easier to comply with the clean air act and make it allow for greater flexibility and when i looked at all the relevant statutory to didn't think congress had answered a question and didn't think congress had focused on it and at the end of the day it was a policy question and it was a policy judgment that congress was not in trying to statute. there was this particular question about the clean air act had been decided. years later judg
it wasn't a case that was in the supreme court at the time the court did grant it and the court did not think it was doing anything new. justice stevens about the court was applying the same as it had been applying for 40 years. in giving due weight or respect to the use of the agency. and the issue before the court whether or not the word source in the clean air act should refer to an individual discrete smokestack or admission for a minute from a larger building or facility of the whole was...
0
0.0
Jul 1, 2024
07/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
this is a court that's unfettered. and an imperial court has now given us an imperial president. >> please stay with me, we have more on this breaking news, president biden will speak tonight on the supreme court immunity ruling when we're back in just 90 seconds. we're bac in just 90 seconds true miracles of evolution. where there is one, others aren't far behind. always scavenging for food, the cockroach... well that's horrifying. ortho home defense max indoor insect barrier. one application kills and prevents bugs for 365 days. not in my house you don't. nature is wild. your home doesn't have to be. nexium 24hr prevents heartburn acid for twice as long as pepcid. get all-day and all-night heartburn acid prevention with just one pill a day. choose acid prevention. choose nexium. >>> breaking news tonight, the white house announcing just now that president biden will comment on the supreme court ruling later tonight. those comments are expected to occur at 7:45 p.m. eastern. but now i want to delve into some more from
this is a court that's unfettered. and an imperial court has now given us an imperial president. >> please stay with me, we have more on this breaking news, president biden will speak tonight on the supreme court immunity ruling when we're back in just 90 seconds. we're bac in just 90 seconds true miracles of evolution. where there is one, others aren't far behind. always scavenging for food, the cockroach... well that's horrifying. ortho home defense max indoor insect barrier. one...
0
0.0
Jul 1, 2024
07/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the court wrote it down. and that answer is the logical, you know, apex of where those things go over time. but to have that radicalism land, when you have a potential next term of donald trump on the horizon if he wins in november, where he's saying exactly what he'll do with this power, is quite a remarkable thing, you'll notice that nobody in reacting to today's ruling they're saying, wow, how scary, what is joe biden going to do with this power, right, nobody's saying that, nobody is worried a president like joe biden is going to, you know, abuse this in such a way that's going to be bring about a de dictatorship. because a this's what donald trump is promising that, they're doing this in the full context, the full knowledge of the radicalism of what they're bringing down upon the country and the only solution to this, the only way out of this is to have noncriminals and nonauthoritarian-minded win presidential elections. this is the only way to fix it. if you have someone who's criminal or authoritarian
the court wrote it down. and that answer is the logical, you know, apex of where those things go over time. but to have that radicalism land, when you have a potential next term of donald trump on the horizon if he wins in november, where he's saying exactly what he'll do with this power, is quite a remarkable thing, you'll notice that nobody in reacting to today's ruling they're saying, wow, how scary, what is joe biden going to do with this power, right, nobody's saying that, nobody is...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that's this power that this court, this corrupt court has given him. so we are in deep, deep trouble, and the trouble is not -- is now. it's not we'll fix it by electing joe biden, although that would be a big fix, this court is no longer a serious, fair, legitimate court. it is a tool of the far right. there's corruption. they were chosen in a corrupt process. this has been going on for 20 years when the supreme court stopped the vote on a 5-4 partisan vote in 2000 between gore and bush. it's one thing to make a ruling, it's another thing to stop the vote count. so this is 20 years and the federalist society is, you know, financed by gazillionairs and they now have won. can we stop them? can we reassess and support our democracy as they did in poland where they got their democracy back at the ballot box. but the window for that is closing. >> it may be hobbled but not down and out. please stick with me. coming up, what is next for jack smith and the coup case and big news about trump's criminal sentencing. plus, we've got michael beschloss about ameri
that's this power that this court, this corrupt court has given him. so we are in deep, deep trouble, and the trouble is not -- is now. it's not we'll fix it by electing joe biden, although that would be a big fix, this court is no longer a serious, fair, legitimate court. it is a tool of the far right. there's corruption. they were chosen in a corrupt process. this has been going on for 20 years when the supreme court stopped the vote on a 5-4 partisan vote in 2000 between gore and bush. it's...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
following the high court's decision, u.s. district judge tonia chutkan will be responsible for determining what, if any, of the conduct alleged in the indictment against trump is considered an official act. and therefore, protected from prosecution. her ultimate decisions could then be subjected to further appeal, meaning a trump trial is unlikely to happen until well into 2025. special counsel jack smith's team is likely to argue that all of the charges against trump can stand. a person familiar tells nbc news the special counsel is not as of now planning to ask the supreme court to move more quickly than usual to issue its official judgment. joining us now is msnbc legal analyst glenn kirschner, he's a former assistant u.s. attorney of the district of columbia. also with us is msnbc legal analyst charles coleman. i was surprised at yesterday's ruling. glenn, were you surprised by the court's ruling yesterday? >> yes, the breadth of the, the sweep of it, the lawlessness of it. so i think with one legal ruling what the suprem
following the high court's decision, u.s. district judge tonia chutkan will be responsible for determining what, if any, of the conduct alleged in the indictment against trump is considered an official act. and therefore, protected from prosecution. her ultimate decisions could then be subjected to further appeal, meaning a trump trial is unlikely to happen until well into 2025. special counsel jack smith's team is likely to argue that all of the charges against trump can stand. a person...
0
0.0
Jul 30, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
they are the signs of a court run amok.d news is that the constitution provides a remedy to the supreme court's current morass, congress has the authority to issue strong checks on the judiciary through legislation and congress has the authority to speak on constitutional issues. the constitution is clear, the supreme court does not get the final word. an option i'm seriously considering is drawing up legislation clarifying that the president is not immune from violations of federal law. one of the justices recently claimed there is to this provision in the constitution that gives congress authority to regulate the courts. i respectfully suggest that this justice reread the constitution because it's plain as day that congress is well within its rights to conduct oversight. accountability shouldn't be a dirty word when we talk about the supreme court. americans across the ideological spectrum agree that checks and balances are necessary and they agree it should apply to the supreme court just as they apply 0 other branches o
they are the signs of a court run amok.d news is that the constitution provides a remedy to the supreme court's current morass, congress has the authority to issue strong checks on the judiciary through legislation and congress has the authority to speak on constitutional issues. the constitution is clear, the supreme court does not get the final word. an option i'm seriously considering is drawing up legislation clarifying that the president is not immune from violations of federal law. one of...
0
0.0
Jul 11, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
confirmation to the court is a lifetime appointment. whereby justices are entrusted with decisions that powerfully shape the nation as well as the lives of every american. for this reason and others, the constitution rightfully and explicitly holds justices to even higher standards than members of congress or even the president. section 1 of article 3 of the constitution commands federal justices to hold their offices during good behavior. in addition to its clauses barring treason, bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors. and congress has exercised its power to reinforce this higher standard of the judiciary before. this body has impeached and removed eight federal judges for transgressions ranging from evading income tax and perjury to intoxication on the bench and abandoning the office to join the confederacy. perhaps most critical to the legitimacy of the institution, these judicial standards require justices to recuse themselves in any proceeding where their impartiality might reasonably be questioned. in other words, if a p
confirmation to the court is a lifetime appointment. whereby justices are entrusted with decisions that powerfully shape the nation as well as the lives of every american. for this reason and others, the constitution rightfully and explicitly holds justices to even higher standards than members of congress or even the president. section 1 of article 3 of the constitution commands federal justices to hold their offices during good behavior. in addition to its clauses barring treason, bribery and...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court has reserved that issue for determination by the district court. and we'll see how arguments fall in front of the district court. yeah. we've walked through those historical references here before. none of them compared to what we saw 2020 with the fake slates of electors, but will scharf great to have your reaction to this. thank you for joining us tonight. >> i would disagree with that, katelyn, but great to be with you. thank you. >> that does not surprise me at all. thank you very much. well, and here with me now, a former federal prosecutor who was inside the supreme court today, shan wu also cnn senior legal analyst and former assistant us attorney elie honig, as well i'll see you didn't senior law enforcement analysts and the former fbi deputy director andrew mccabe. great to have you all here. le let me start with you because on this new reporting tonight of how this decision here in washington has already extending and having its impact felt new york, you predicted this earlier when you were hearing that this was going to happen within an
the supreme court has reserved that issue for determination by the district court. and we'll see how arguments fall in front of the district court. yeah. we've walked through those historical references here before. none of them compared to what we saw 2020 with the fake slates of electors, but will scharf great to have your reaction to this. thank you for joining us tonight. >> i would disagree with that, katelyn, but great to be with you. thank you. >> that does not surprise me at...
0
0.0
Jul 1, 2024
07/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court court, majority ruled that presidents have limited immunity from prosecution and they can be criminally prosecuted for unofficial acts. trump claiming he had presidential immunity from four felony charges in his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. i'm sandra smith in for harris faulkner. a big news day. the supreme court has thrown the case back to a federal judge to decide if trump's felony january 6th charges meet the criteria for prosecution. a trump campaign senior advisor with this moments ago. >> they basically have said sorry, jack smith, you don't get to just impede and intrude on the executive branch. we get to have protections for presidents who are doing things while they are in office so they don't come out and get targeted and criminally and civilly sued. it is very important. a good decision. obviously i believe absolute immunity should exist for the executive branch but they did recognize it. >> sandra: shannon bream is all over this and live at the supreme court with continued reaction to this. shannon. >> sandra, the bottom line is a win for the trump c
supreme court court, majority ruled that presidents have limited immunity from prosecution and they can be criminally prosecuted for unofficial acts. trump claiming he had presidential immunity from four felony charges in his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. i'm sandra smith in for harris faulkner. a big news day. the supreme court has thrown the case back to a federal judge to decide if trump's felony january 6th charges meet the criteria for prosecution. a trump campaign senior advisor...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
their district court. now, even just the false lots of electors, you don't think that would constitute enough for trial we would say alternate slates of electors. >> and as we argued before, the supreme court alternate slates of electors have been a method used by previous presidents that most notably ulysses s grant, to ensure the integrity prior elections. so we believe the assembly of those alternate slates of electors was an official act of the presidency. that's what we argued before the supreme court. the supreme court has reserved that issue for determination by the district court. and we'll see how arguments fall in front of the district court. yeah. we've walked through those historical references here before. none of them compared to what we saw in 2020 with the fake slates of electors. but will scharf great to have your reaction to this. thank you for joining us tonight. >> i would disagree with that, katelyn, but great to be with you. thank you. >> that does not surprise me at all. thank you ve
their district court. now, even just the false lots of electors, you don't think that would constitute enough for trial we would say alternate slates of electors. >> and as we argued before, the supreme court alternate slates of electors have been a method used by previous presidents that most notably ulysses s grant, to ensure the integrity prior elections. so we believe the assembly of those alternate slates of electors was an official act of the presidency. that's what we argued before...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
what the trial court -- the supreme court is telling the trial court to consider, they want to know morelse was said contemporaneous to communications or who was involved in transmitting electronic communications and in organizing the rally and relevant to classification of each communication". i say that and explain that because this is going to be a pain staking and detailed time consuming effort to really pull apart and some sense really re-litigate the issues around the january 6 events, but short term seems like a victory for the former president donald trump because that means this big issue is going to push this case well beyond the election. ash. ashley: thank you very much, lydia. one minute to you, guy lewis. there are those saying, hey, the courts decided with donald trump more than expected. would you agree with that? >> i don't necessarily because, listen, ash, i was a prosecutor, a federal prosecutor for a long time, and i had the same immunity. i can make the kind of decisions that mattered in te terms of federal prosecution, and i was immune from being prosecuted. shouldn
what the trial court -- the supreme court is telling the trial court to consider, they want to know morelse was said contemporaneous to communications or who was involved in transmitting electronic communications and in organizing the rally and relevant to classification of each communication". i say that and explain that because this is going to be a pain staking and detailed time consuming effort to really pull apart and some sense really re-litigate the issues around the january 6...
0
0.0
Jul 31, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
could the attorney general come into court? and asks the court to order another court. when there was no client, there was no nobody, you know, it wasn't an adversarial thing. he just it was what they do in england. it was what they did in virginia. you go to court and you ask them to do something and it's been assumed that the court said no in the united states. we have the adversarial system. plaintiff defendant and that is not true. because it turns out that the question was simply. could the attorney general do this without first seeking the permission of the president? that was the question and that's what they divided on but nobody knew that till we found the letters that told us that a few years ago. but as many justices say we are not going to go back and changes david shapiro loved it. put it in his heart and wexler, but you know when we're not going to overturn this it looks like the adversarial system was inevitable. it wasn't but also that was the beginning of judicial review and eventually the court. just didn't decide the case because they didn't want to s
could the attorney general come into court? and asks the court to order another court. when there was no client, there was no nobody, you know, it wasn't an adversarial thing. he just it was what they do in england. it was what they did in virginia. you go to court and you ask them to do something and it's been assumed that the court said no in the united states. we have the adversarial system. plaintiff defendant and that is not true. because it turns out that the question was simply. could...
0
0.0
Jul 1, 2024
07/24
by
KPIX
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
a groundbreaking decision from our nation's highest court.nts have absolutely immunity for official acts while in office, but they do not have immunity for unofficial acts. that means donald trump can and will certainly claim brought immunity and is pending federal election interference case that is now on like to be resolved before election date. chief loftus john roberts pending opinion writing "the president may not be exercised for occupying his core constitutional powers." as for the dissent, justice's odious sodi sonja sort of mayor looked at these hypotheticals. "orders seal six to a political rival, immune. holds a political queue to hold power, a moon. takes a bribe in exchange for -- immune. we have the legal implications of this, jan crawford starts us off at the supreme court. >> reporter: the landmark decision on the scope of presidential immunity extends the case back to a lower court to determine the specifics. which of donald trump's actions to overturn the 2020 election go beyond the official acts of the sitting president and
a groundbreaking decision from our nation's highest court.nts have absolutely immunity for official acts while in office, but they do not have immunity for unofficial acts. that means donald trump can and will certainly claim brought immunity and is pending federal election interference case that is now on like to be resolved before election date. chief loftus john roberts pending opinion writing "the president may not be exercised for occupying his core constitutional powers." as for...
0
0.0
Jul 11, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it's remanded those decisions back to the trial courts to apply the law as the court articulated. the court did not offer any sort of protection against unofficial acts. the justices didn't grant the president cart blanche to commit crimes with impunity. it simply clarified that the president is entitled to immunity while performing official acts. this opinion is not contrary to some claims of a monumental shift in policy. presidential immunity was established in previous cases to protect the integrity of the executive branch. and it recognizes that a president, any president, a democratically elected -- democrat president or republican president needs some latitude to make tough calls on public policy and matters facing the country without the threat of being sued incessantly and being distracted from their duties to serve the american people in this office. i think back on george w. bush's presidency when the nation was attacked by al qaeda on 9/11. nearly 3,000 americans were killed on that day, and president bush made the decision that i have to imagine was one of the most dif
it's remanded those decisions back to the trial courts to apply the law as the court articulated. the court did not offer any sort of protection against unofficial acts. the justices didn't grant the president cart blanche to commit crimes with impunity. it simply clarified that the president is entitled to immunity while performing official acts. this opinion is not contrary to some claims of a monumental shift in policy. presidential immunity was established in previous cases to protect the...
0
0.0
Jul 4, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
there's the supreme court.ut on our constitutional system, the highest above all of them, the highest of the high are the people. right? so we are the people who can be the highest of the high. and what we need to do is to vote in december. i'm sorry, we need to vote in november. we need to vote in november like the future of democracy is on the ballot because it is. we need to make sure we are all registered. we need to make sure our friends and families are registered and we need to cut away the could be webs and the -- cobwebs and the nonsense and all of the other things caught in people's brains and we need to tell them to vote for a democrat from the top of the ballot to the very, very bottom. i don't want to hear about it, i don't want to hear anything else about why this candidate or that candidate or this moderate republican or that sensible centrist. you need to vote for democracy. and that means voting from top of the ticket to the bottom, democratic. and that's why i love the work that jewish democra
there's the supreme court.ut on our constitutional system, the highest above all of them, the highest of the high are the people. right? so we are the people who can be the highest of the high. and what we need to do is to vote in december. i'm sorry, we need to vote in november. we need to vote in november like the future of democracy is on the ballot because it is. we need to make sure we are all registered. we need to make sure our friends and families are registered and we need to cut away...
0
0.0
Jul 4, 2024
07/24
by
ALJAZ
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the core business of the court is funded by the budget of the court where it's not about voluntary contribution. it's a mandatory participation to the i. c budget for all the states. part of the i see investigation into brush potential crumbs and rock had essentially been dropped wide. why was it dropped? but it was not the instigation to us. a print examination to decide whether or not to open an investigation and then that has stopped based on the fact that the judicial system in the u. k. was looking into some of those cases as what and if there are genuine investigations on the national level, then by law, the prosecutor cannot go ahead and open this investigation. can you kind of, we had that's the icpc is concentrating too much on prosecuting the perpetrators and nothing off on the fac, compensation to victims. how do you respond to that? we have to try to find that i see is not a maintaining an 8 organization. the main focus of the isis, he has to remain the investigations and trying to establish the individual criminal responsibility for this suspect. now that's something we know it cou
the core business of the court is funded by the budget of the court where it's not about voluntary contribution. it's a mandatory participation to the i. c budget for all the states. part of the i see investigation into brush potential crumbs and rock had essentially been dropped wide. why was it dropped? but it was not the instigation to us. a print examination to decide whether or not to open an investigation and then that has stopped based on the fact that the judicial system in the u. k....
0
0.0
Jul 4, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and here we now have a supreme court that is best described as the yolo court. i mean, you live only once and like you're there doing everything, all the things the judge mentioned, abortion, affirmative action, voting rights, getting rid of chevron guns, you know, the religion. you know, lgbt issues. i mean, they are deciding everything and so one thing is just the scope of what they're deciding. and the other is some of the substance. i mean, and this is just a descriptive point. people can have different views on roe versus wade. but remember, roe versus wade decided in 1973 by a court that is majority republican appointees, 7 to 2 and written by harry blackman, a republican appointee. and when it looked like roe was under question three justices in 1992, all appointed by republican presidents kennedy, souter and o'connor said, look, you can have disagreements about roe, but if you overrule roe, if we were to overrule roe, it would really damage the legitimacy of the court that roe was woven into the fabric of our society and social expectations have crystall
and here we now have a supreme court that is best described as the yolo court. i mean, you live only once and like you're there doing everything, all the things the judge mentioned, abortion, affirmative action, voting rights, getting rid of chevron guns, you know, the religion. you know, lgbt issues. i mean, they are deciding everything and so one thing is just the scope of what they're deciding. and the other is some of the substance. i mean, and this is just a descriptive point. people can...
0
0.0
Jul 30, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the court, the supreme court did not begin with the prayer. the circuit courts did not begin with a prayer. except for new england. and jay was present. but it was the first year that this happened. and they didn't want to antagonize the citizens who all came to hear court cases. it was kind of entertainment at the time. in new england sunday was allowed to, quote, address the throne of grace before the court session began. but jay was dead set against it. i did want to tell you. >> thanks very much for interesting interinstitutional background and reminder of jay's vision of ethics for the court. i don't want to leave -- washington without getting a sense of his constitutional philosophy. you persuasively argued the most underappreciated founding father. from wilson, this philosophy of law from scottish indictment. -- it must have been really interesting for you to write about because they invoked washington's opinion is the central protection for rights of natural citizenship. so just give us a sense of what washington and wilson's constitut
the court, the supreme court did not begin with the prayer. the circuit courts did not begin with a prayer. except for new england. and jay was present. but it was the first year that this happened. and they didn't want to antagonize the citizens who all came to hear court cases. it was kind of entertainment at the time. in new england sunday was allowed to, quote, address the throne of grace before the court session began. but jay was dead set against it. i did want to tell you. >>...
0
0.0
Jul 1, 2024
07/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
trump's supreme court has decreed him a king.on't know if i have ever seen you this emotional. >> yeah. it is. it's so scary. >> jason: what new powers does the left thing the ruling gives the president? >> the president, like donald trump, can take a blatantly illegal act, slap the label, hey, this san official act. >> hurt a political opponent, according to this court, it doesn't matter. >> he could shoot someone in the middle of fifth avenue in new york and get away with it. we hopefully will not see him test that theory. >> the president can task them to assassinate somebody? >> we don't know because this thing ping-pongs back and forth, -- i don't think. jason jason unfortunately this lunacy isn't just contained to the media. justice sotomayor's dissent claims that the president can order seal team 6 to assassinate a rival. organize a military coup. and take bribes with immunity. it's one thing for the media to engage in this brazen irresponsible fear-mongering, it's another when a sitting supreme court justice is underminin
trump's supreme court has decreed him a king.on't know if i have ever seen you this emotional. >> yeah. it is. it's so scary. >> jason: what new powers does the left thing the ruling gives the president? >> the president, like donald trump, can take a blatantly illegal act, slap the label, hey, this san official act. >> hurt a political opponent, according to this court, it doesn't matter. >> he could shoot someone in the middle of fifth avenue in new york and get...