in 2018, there was a request through darpa. darpa is a part of the defense departmentnt and research advane department agency. thee request was from dr. xi, e bat scientist in wuhan and scientist at unc doing a lot of work with her, and ralph bar rack, who i call -- ralph barrack and peter who is the bag man for wuhan. they asked for research money in 2018 frompa darpa to take a coronavirus and have the site that allows it to get into human cells and remarkably we turned it down and wouldn't that be a clueoi if a year later there waa virus in wuhan if you'd done that project and going to ralph and one of the scientists and we were going to do that. we didn't get the money and wonder if they did it. a whistle blower at darpa told us about it and surmise it had should have been in the file and looked again after six months later and altercation with fauci and t moving it initially and moved back to a file. i don't know if he's physically talking about old fashion file or computer file, file ago computer file but he finds it and w

why couldn't we find the darpa's stuff? why didn't either scientist so it's a conspiracy involving hundreds of people, but they're not in a room rubbing their hands like, oh, well, you know, we're going to be evil today. they're just self-interested in covering that, covering this up. but i the book because in the end we have to do something to try to prevent this from happening. there's a group of 33 scientists and we outline some of their proposals. we've had some of them come, but there are proposals for trying to make this safe. most of them say we should treat this like nuclear weapons. so as much as i'm for freedom i'm really not for letting you enrich uranium, there are some rules on on buying know centrifuges, your own uranium are some rules. and i think those are reasonable. and i think there ought to be some rules on dna synthesis. and we ought to we ought to look into this. and there are certain things that we you know, it's our money and we maybe shouldn't funding stuff to create viruses that could take off or l

because a whistleblower at darpa told us about it and he said he looked for it in a file. he surmised it should have been in a file and it wasn't there. he looked again six months later after i had had an altercation with fauci and it was back in the file. he thinks they moved it initially and then it's back in the file. i don't know if he's talking about a physical file or-- but we know about this through a whistleblower and they deny it to this day. and why wouldn't have they have told us. and ralph met with fouche in the first month. and the missouri versus biden case, doesn't remember ralph barrack. we found a video, and i love doing this when researching the book. we found a scientific conference and anthony fauci is up, and barrack is next, and he's sitting in the front row, in for an hour and a half and we asked him about the doctor, i'm not good with asian names. like bill clinton, in the deposition said he didn't recall. and as we discover the facts and trying to get it out. in the beginning i really wasn't that involved with this. in 2020, the scientists said it

but i was gambling based on what it seems in the darpa program, aces program, the airorce, the loyal winan program the boeing was doing with australia. i was confident that we were close enough that we cld make a commitment and to commend the severalillion dolrs. we'v already found some ways to get some of his work started. it's underway. but weensely need 24 funding to keep it going to kp it on pace. we're in a race for chnological superiority with an adversary is doing a very good j of competing with us, and we cannot waste time period the loss of time just from when we started this concept when you came up with thedea to today is two years. we may lose a few don'tet a 24 budget we may lose another year. that is an enormous head start to give somebod else. don't think it is because of not payingttention and u well aware of this. one of the things that impresses me about china in particular is their willingness to innovate and bullets to do things that are nontraditional. everything that's happened since the decision to go in distraion two years ago, reinforces my perception that it

i went to a sharp and pointed at the magnetic darpa because it looks similar, the rest is history.ppy, but it is all paid off. unbelievable. i havejust got into the top 64 now with the prize money, but i never thought about getting into the semifinals in my debut this year. brendan said, well done, you can go all the way, like raymond. i would love to get off to a fast mark, like i have done in all my but if i do got goa set down i have to come back. i have been to the arsenal game, the tottenham game, and peoplejust come up to me, you don't even know who they are but they know me. it is a good feeling. i will always take pictures with anyone. i was injames maddison's box. it was really nice. my mum and dad are the biggest. they have supported me, they have told me to get on the board and looked down and i had buy opportunity to get all the sponsors. them two of the main people. the build—up to david warner's final test for australia before retiring has been overshadowed after his cap was stolen from his luggage while he was travelling to sydney ahead of the third and final test ag

being that this technology was created by darpa, all your social medias and all your communications is controlled by social government being that we have foreign dictator government that is we work with, that we help being that computers and this gentleman said that the social media was more complicated than this other ai but other countries are building robots to replace human beings. also law enforcement who has been killing the majority of people color. >> do you have something specifically about the election? yeah, i thinkti the whole system is rigged because every president that's ever been president is related to the king of england, okay. obama was even related to the king of england. >> we are getting off the subject there. let's talk to jake in statem, georgia. >> good morning. >> good morning. >> i'm completely for technology and artificial intelligence but it seems like the country itself, what is evil is good and what is good is evil. how do you think artificial intelligence is going to have the impact on that statement i just made and i think it -- it can come from the rep

what we do know is this in 2018 there's a request through darpa that is a research project agency and request was from the scientists who've done a lot of this work and ralph and peter who i call the bad man, the bagman that carries the money. they asked for research money to take a coronavirus that allows it to get the human cells and remarkably he turned it down but wouldn't that be a clue if a year later there's all of a sudden a virus going on that looks just like this if you had done this project let's say you are one of the scientists wouldn't you immediately remember anna say we were going to do that but then we didn't get the money. i wonder if they did it. not one of this reported it. do you know how we know the research project because the whistleblower told us about it and said he looked for it in the file and surmised that it should have been in the file and it wasn't there. he looked again after i'd had an altercation and it was back in the file. he thinks they moved it initially and then back into a file. i don't know if he's talking about an old-fashioned file or comput

it was really through the national science foundation or darpa in the defenseepartment or through the nih, it would encourage faculty, graduate students, postdocs to dream big about what was possible. and funding was given to dreaming big about what was possible. out of that came some of the biggest breakthroughs in universities on some of the most fundamental research, because the government understood that these things might not be commercialize of all ever, but this certainly were not immediately. so the protection of that base, the fundamental base became one of the hallmarks of the united states. i can tell you as provost of stanford i got to oversee that research enterprise. and, of course, we had a lot to come out of that because there's a story going back before that in 1934, these two graduate students asked their deanhe of engineering to fund, to give him $500 hundred dollars to commercialize the product. that would be bill hewlett and david packard. in 2000 the university would help a couple of its graduate student, larry page and larry brent who would found google. so this

we cannot do military, nasa, darpa.you're going to have a little bit of both. 80%, most of the r&d. most of these problems you cannot fix without government. but if you want the big money in utilities, climate, cars, penicillin, medical, it is companies. the government does not have money to do that. the value of america is $150 trillion. those companies have the unbelievable wherewithal. big and small, all companies. margaret: question from the audience. we are seeing initiatives take in missouri and connecticut, still in knee-jerk reaction to cash for families, they will use it for drugs. please are thwarting edution. how can people across the aisle manage innovation successfully? jamie: i like testing something. i don't know if the baby bonds would work. we have tested this. once a person starts saving, they continue to save. make it easy on your phone, put your paycheck, five dollars a month or something. some of these might work. i am in favor of catching them. the problem with several programs as they are not test

we cannot do military, nasa, darpa.ou're going to have a little bit of both. 80%, most of the r&d. most of these problems you cannot fix without government. but if you want the big money in utilities, climate, cars, penicillin, medical, it is companies. the government does not have money to do that. the value of america is $150 trillion. those companies have the unbelievable wherewithal. big and small, all companies. margaret: question from the audience. we are seeing initiatives take in missouri and connecticut, still in knee-jerk reaction to cash for families, they will use it for drugs. please are thwarting education. how can people across the aisle manage innovation successfully? jamie: i like testing something. i don't know if the baby bonds would work. we have tested this. once a person starts saving, they continue to save. make it easy on your phone, put your paycheck, five dollars a month or something. some of these might work. i am in favor of catching them. the problem with several programs as they are not tes

we cannot do military, nasa, darpa.ou're going to have a little bit of both. 80%, most of the r&d. some of these problems you cannot fix without government. but you want the big money in utilities, climate, cars, penicillin, medical, it is companies. the government does not have money to do that. the value of america is $150 trillion. those companies have the unbelievable wherewithal. big and small, all companies. margaret: question from the audience. we are seeing initiatives take off in missouri and connecticut, still a knee-jerk reaction to cash payments for families, they will use it for drugs. these thoughts are thwarting innovation at the state and local level. how can people across the aisle manage innovation successfully? jamie: i like testing something. i don't know if the baby bonds would work. we have tested this. once a person starts saving, they continue to save. we have these community branches, make it easy on your phone, put your paycheck, five dollars a month or something. some of these might work. i am

served on the armed services committee for seven years, having served on the committee that oversees darpa, advanced technologies for several years. when we with the flight crew . and when he showed us the photo i asked why the video wasn't engaged. why wouldn't have system that worked. here's what he said. they were out on a test mission over the gulf of mexico. we were on a test mission, you shall have clear or spice. they saw a sequence of four craft in a clear diamond formation for which there is a radar sequence that i, and i alone have observed in the united states congress. one of the pilots goes to check out that diamond formation and sees a large floating what i can only describe as an orb, again like i said, not of any human capability that i'm aware of. when he approached, he said that his radar went down. he said his system munn functioned and had to manually take this image from one of the lenses and it was an automated and collection as you would ho typically see in a test mission. i guess i will start with commander favor, how should we think about the fact that this craft t